MAG is going to be the biggest console FPS of 2010!

  • 163 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

You can't coordinate attacks with silence or are you going to text your friends this as you play.

I've read impressions on many boards, it's going to flop.

nhh18

I am just reading system wars responses because I doubt some people played the beta. The only mode is sabotage which is 64 players. It takes 4-6 hours of playing time to get to a 256 player match, and people saying this is the worst game ever and is going to flop and score worse than 6.0 honestly played this game for more than 4 hours? I really get disgusted with ps3 exclusives with this bs hate. The stuff like gun shooting is terrible, etc. But if you honestly haven't even touched the game, don't say stuff you don't know. Now, I am not going to go all this game is going to be the greatest thing ever because I don't like the game at all for different reasons. But if you played the game, didn't like it. Don't say 256 game mode is a gimmick when you haven't played it, just say you don't like the sabatage mode and the game isn't for me.

Sorry for making predictions, but a game based on team-work that won't have team-work isn't going to work.

Never said anything I didn't know either. I just know that toned down graphics are most likely to reduce lag and that people with slower connections PROBABLY won't enjoy the game.

I lag in Left 4 Dead, those are dedicated servers and only accomodate 8-person matches. When TONS of zombies are on screen, you lag even more.

I'll draw conclusions based on other experiences, not pulling them out of the air.

And another fact is that L4D2 has mediocre graphics, and I still lag, what is honestly going to be any better for people like me who want to try a 256-player game? I expressed some interest, but I know it's not worth it.

Avatar image for tbolt76
tbolt76

987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#152 tbolt76
Member since 2008 • 987 Posts

From the beta I can say that this will be one of the worst ps3 exclusives ever released.Miroku32

I played the beta, and Haze it is not. Although it is no KZ2 or Uncharted either.

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

You can't coordinate attacks with silence or are you going to text your friends this as you play.

I've read impressions on many boards, it's going to flop.

HavocV3

I am just reading system wars responses because I doubt some people played the beta. The only mode is sabotage which is 64 players. It takes 4-6 hours of playing time to get to a 256 player match, and people saying this is the worst game ever and is going to flop and score worse than 6.0 honestly played this game for more than 4 hours? I really get disgusted with ps3 exclusives with this bs hate. The stuff like gun shooting is terrible, etc. But if you honestly haven't even touched the game, don't say stuff you don't know. Now, I am not going to go all this game is going to be the greatest thing ever because I don't like the game at all for different reasons. But if you played the game, didn't like it. Don't say 256 game mode is a gimmick when you haven't played it, just say you don't like the sabatage mode and the game isn't for me.

Sorry for making predictions, but a game based on team-work that won't have team-work isn't going to work.

Never said anything I didn't know either. I just know that toned down graphics are most likely to reduce lag and that people with slower connections PROBABLY won't enjoy the game.

I lag in Left 4 Dead, those are dedicated servers and only accomodate 8-person matches. When TONS of zombies are on screen, you lag even more.

I'll draw conclusions based on other experiences, not pulling them out of the air.

And another fact is that L4D2 has mediocre graphics, and I still lag, what is honestly going to be any better for people like me who want to try a 256-player game? I expressed some interest, but I know it's not worth it.

I sometimes random quote sorry about that :D.

Avatar image for ZAGAV3
ZAGAV3

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 ZAGAV3
Member since 2009 • 380 Posts

Halo will destroy MAG!!!!!!!! :D

Avatar image for ball_of_air
ball_of_air

2105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 ball_of_air
Member since 2007 • 2105 Posts

MAG :lol:

Avatar image for Rockman999
Rockman999

7507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 Rockman999
Member since 2005 • 7507 Posts

[QUOTE="Rockman999"]TC, you're wrong, VERY wrong.BFBC2 will shat on every FPS's face and kick Halo Reach in the dingle berries.ZAGAV3

Keep dreaming on the last one. Reach will decimate anything Bad Company related in every single way.

Right back at ya buddy ;).Sure it may out score and sell more copies than BFBC2 but BFBC2 will still be superior.
Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#158 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

Thats a big call, you know. Anyway, I havent really played it but I know there is 256 players but does it feel big? The teams would probably spread out so that means you might not see everyone. Just guessing here

Avatar image for ZAGAV3
ZAGAV3

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 ZAGAV3
Member since 2009 • 380 Posts

[QUOTE="ZAGAV3"]

[QUOTE="Rockman999"]TC, you're wrong, VERY wrong.BFBC2 will shat on every FPS's face and kick Halo Reach in the dingle berries.Rockman999

Keep dreaming on the last one. Reach will decimate anything Bad Company related in every single way.

Right back at ya buddy ;).Sure it may out score and sell more copies than BFBC2 but BFBC2 will still be superior.

How could BC possibly be superior if it gets outscored? That logic fails.

Avatar image for iamshivy
iamshivy

3565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#160 iamshivy
Member since 2007 • 3565 Posts

if you said biggest flop. i might agree with you

Avatar image for Nedemis
Nedemis

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#162 Nedemis
Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts
[QUOTE="ZAGAV3"]

[QUOTE="Rockman999"]TC, you're wrong, VERY wrong.BFBC2 will shat on every FPS's face and kick Halo Reach in the dingle berries.Rockman999

Keep dreaming on the last one. Reach will decimate anything Bad Company related in every single way.

Right back at ya buddy ;).Sure it may out score and sell more copies than BFBC2 but BFBC2 will still be superior.

I would ALMOST agree with you if the first BC game didn't blow hard. That's like saying a HAZE sequel would be the best FPS in 2010 if it were announced. IMHO, the BF series sucks so bad that it's the first franchise EA should mercy kill this year.
Avatar image for GodofBigMacs
GodofBigMacs

6440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#163 GodofBigMacs
Member since 2008 • 6440 Posts
I was in the beta. It was good. Not great. Just good. Nothing to write home about, though.