mario galaxy 2 > starcraft 2

now your going to get the almighty hermits butthurt over this

btw how are you comparing two completely different games?

platformers are more fun than RTS's, is all i gotta say. Rahnyc4

Opinions etc

[QUOTE="oldkingallant"][QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"]I haven't played either but due to standards its obvious that SC2 on wii would have got 10 (in lack of higher scores) and SMG2 on PC would have probably been 9.0gamebreakerz__

now your going to get the almighty hermits butthurt over this

btw how are you comparing two completely different games?

Mario1331

[QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"][QUOTE="infamousxii"] I see your still on your crusade to prove console is better than PC because it doesnt have a 10. Anyways everyone but you unstands that PC will never get a 10, the pc is unlimted in it's ability so nothing will ever be perfect.infamousxii

"insert funny face palm pic"

whats wrong with alienware?i mean they are gaming laptops.....

Even if StarCraft 2 scores a 5 its still a better game than Super Mario Galaxy 2raskullibur

oh cmon now this is just an ignorant statement

[QUOTE="raskullibur"]Even if StarCraft 2 scores a 5 its still a better game than Super Mario Galaxy 2Mario1331

oh cmon now this is just an ignorant statement

By the way let's talk about standards. In 2007 Super Mario Galaxy won Gamespot's Overall Game of the Year. 2007 was a pretty tough year, there were games on other platforms that scored a 9.5... but SMG won. Huh, I guess SMG wasn't graded on a lower standard because of the Wii, seeing as it was able to beat out other 9.5 rated games on other platforms.

Now for the absurd theory that standards even vary when picking GOTY, a Wii game is more likely to win than a PC game of equal quality? Is that your explanation? :roll:

By the way let's talk about standards. In 2007 Super Mario Galaxy won Gamespot's Overall Game of the Year. 2007 was a pretty tough year, there were games on other platforms that scored a 9.5... but SMG won. Huh, I guess SMG wasn't graded on a lower standard because of the Wii, seeing as it was able to beat out other 9.5 rated games on other platforms.

Now for the absurd theory that standards even vary when picking GOTY, a Wii game is more likely to win than a PC game of equal quality? Is that your explanation? :roll:

idk about all this standard nonsense but i do know DS won GOTY, and SMG won GOTY against Halo3 and Crysis and other big names

GS score wise , PC was really close to a AAAAE this time

AmnesiaHaze

The fact that you base how good a game is upon a website's review score is reason for concern... try thinking for yourself.

[QUOTE="wooooode"]If Starcraft 2 was on the Wii it would have got a 20.ForceFreeze

Not after being dumbed down for the port, of course >_>

I don't see how your comparing two games with each one being from different genres.

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"][QUOTE="oldkingallant"] *facepalm* Yes I'm sure the PC gets scored on higher standards than consoles... that's why Halo Wars one of the better RTS for consoles (which isn't saying much) got a 6.5 here. REALLY adjusted to the standards there. So are PS3 and 360 also judged on a lower standard? Or are you once again showing your rabid fanboyism and unfounded hate for the Wii?oldkingallant

"We rate games on a scale of 1 (the absolute worst) to 10 (the absolute best). The rating we assign to each game is intended to give you an at-a-glance sense of the overall quality of the game relative to other games on the same platform.However, we encourage you to read our full reviews and watch our video reviews to give context to our ratings."

So in a sense, different standards i guess.

*facepalm*

And I thought that we had seen all mentally challenged people in System Wars during the "SC2 is not exclusive" argument...I guess I had to know that hope couldn't be so far from the truth.

By the way let's talk about standards. In 2007 Super Mario Galaxy won Gamespot's Overall Game of the Year. 2007 was a pretty tough year, there were games on other platforms that scored a 9.5... but SMG won. Huh, I guess SMG wasn't graded on a lower standard because of the Wii, seeing as it was able to beat out other 9.5 rated games on other platforms.

Now for the absurd theory that standards even vary when picking GOTY, a Wii game is more likely to win than a PC game of equal quality? Is that your explanation? :roll:

oldkingallant

GoTY isn't purely about best standard game though, it's the overall game of the year in terms of quality, innovation, impact enjoyment... Everything... Thus why Demon's Souls won over higher rated games.

[QUOTE="wooooode"]If Starcraft 2 was on the Wii it would have got a 20.ForceFreeze

Not after being dumbed down for the port, of course >_>

[QUOTE="infamousxii"][QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"] im not really comparing the games , the topic title just refers to the scores , the point is more that pc almost got a AAAAE this time , almostAmnesiaHaze

>Gaming

>Laptop

Pick one.

[QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"][QUOTE="infamousxii"] I see your still on your crusade to prove console is better than PC because it doesnt have a 10. Anyways everyone but you unstands that PC will never get a 10, the pc is unlimted in it's ability so nothing will ever be perfect.clyde46

>Gaming

>Laptop

Pick one.

Alienware, however - definitely something wrong with that.CentricStorm

[QUOTE="clyde46"]

[QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"] im not trying to prove anthing , the topic title should just gain attention by being controverse :D , in fact i like pc games as much as console games , if i didnt like pc gaming i wouldnt get a alienware laptop in first placeCentricStorm

>Gaming

>Laptop

Pick one.

>Gaming

>Battery life

Pick one.

>Gaming

>Battery Life

Pick one.

clyde46

[QUOTE="clyde46"]

>Gaming

>Laptop

Pick one.

AmnesiaHaze

[QUOTE="CentricStorm"][QUOTE="clyde46"]

>Gaming

>Laptop

Pick one.

clyde46

>Gaming

>Battery life

Pick one.

i know what you mean, but its not like you cant play on a laptop while its charging thus battery life isnt an issue... However i do believe standard PC's are better for gaming than spending a fortune on a 'gaming' Laptop..

[QUOTE="CentricStorm"]Alienware, however - definitely something wrong with that.AmnesiaHaze

Mario Galaxy is crap. I'd rather play Haze

[QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"]

>Gaming

>Laptop

Pick one.

clyde46

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"] thats true someone needs to invent a battery life regeneration device , oh wait there is the Ac adapter

AmnesiaHaze

Have fun gaming while away from a AC point, oh wait.......clyde46

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"] how would that be different with a desktop without a power outlet , except it has not even the battery life

AmnesiaHaze

If Starcraft 2 was on the Wii it would have got a 20.wooooode

[QUOTE="Kandlegoat"]

Yup...let's compare a Platformer/Adventure game with an RTS.

AmnesiaHaze

PC has higher standards, that is accounted for in review scores. That being said, I'd rather buy SMG2, as I remain convinced that Activision is evil and refuse to ever pay $60 for a game regardless of quality.

[QUOTE="wooooode"]If Starcraft 2 was on the Wii it would have got a 20.surrealnumber5

The standards argument would disagree.

SMG wouldnt get a 10 on the PS3/360 or PC cause it looks like ass. It'd be marked down for graphics. SC2 would get less on the 360 and PS3 then on the wii cause on the Wii it'd be graphics king ...

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="wooooode"]If Starcraft 2 was on the Wii it would have got a 20.-Snooze-

The standards argument would disagree.

SMG wouldnt get a 10 on the PS3/360 or PC cause it looks like ass. It'd be marked down for graphics. SC2 would get less on the 360 and PS3 then on the wii cause on the Wii it'd be graphics king ...

what?

But a 9.5 on PC is like a 10.5 on consoles. The standards are that different (considering no PC game has got a 10 yet). Not to mention the fact you are comparing a 3D platformer to a RTS, two entirely different games with entirely different genre standards.

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="wooooode"]If Starcraft 2 was on the Wii it would have got a 20.-Snooze-

The standards argument would disagree.

SMG wouldnt get a 10 on the PS3/360 or PC cause it looks like ass. It'd be marked down for graphics. SC2 would get less on the 360 and PS3 then on the wii cause on the Wii it'd be graphics king ...

well smg2 could of easily gotten a 9.0 or 9.5 given the right reviewer. Kevin V had some silly issues with starcraft 2 that kept it from getting a 10. Oh well, cest la vie.

[QUOTE="Kandlegoat"]

Yup...let's compare a Platformer/Adventure game with an RTS.

[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] if SMG2 were on the ps360 it would have got a 50 surrealnumber5

The standards argument would disagree.

SMG wouldnt get a 10 on the PS3/360 or PC cause it looks like ass. It'd be marked down for graphics. SC2 would get less on the 360 and PS3 then on the wii cause on the Wii it'd be graphics king ...

It kinda says so in the Gamepsot info thread.

Games are rated according to the console there on. No one was expecting SMG 2 to be HD, and have excellent graphics, cause it's on the Wii. Putting it on the other consoles would of course up the graphical expectations.

You know what , if we take aside scores is a damn FACT that Nintendo fans cant bring their MOTTO """ gameplay wins "" VS SC2.

What i mean is that SC2 is as polished and well done for its genre as it is Mario for its. Not to say is way more difficult to introduce a solid RTS gameplaythan Platform but lets not talk about that.

SO if we assume gameplay is for both games at top standards. What left to compare? ( ill take aside graphics and sound dont worry )

Strong Story and campaign mode , CGIs , great Soundtrack that even hollywood movies might be jealous , great value thru MP , great action pack , epic memorable moments ,great value as a purschase since its fact SC2 gamers wil be playing online at least the next 5-6 years orto be more accurate...... till SC3 release.

Now add the community happenings and events , blizzards monthly support with patching , polishing and why not introducing new content/maps... Its not difficult to declare a clear winner between two... AND NO , im NOT an RTS fan nor im a Platformer fan. I played both and saying some facts here.

SC2s heavy value alone >>>>>>>> SMG2 by miles.... Imho.

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

The standards argument would disagree.

SMG wouldnt get a 10 on the PS3/360 or PC cause it looks like ass. It'd be marked down for graphics. SC2 would get less on the 360 and PS3 then on the wii cause on the Wii it'd be graphics king ...

-Snooze-

It kinda says so in the Gamepsot info thread.

Games are rated according to the console there on. No one was expecting SMG 2 to be HD, and have excellent graphics, cause it's on the Wii. Putting it on the other consoles would of course up the graphical expectations.

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

The standards argument would disagree.

SMG wouldnt get a 10 on the PS3/360 or PC cause it looks like ass. It'd be marked down for graphics. SC2 would get less on the 360 and PS3 then on the wii cause on the Wii it'd be graphics king ...

-Snooze-

It kinda says so in the Gamepsot info thread.

Games are rated according to the console there on. No one was expecting SMG 2 to be HD, and have excellent graphics, cause it's on the Wii. Putting it on the other consoles would of course up the graphical expectations.