[QUOTE="Last-Resort"] Yet, if this was released in place of Sunshine it would have been universally panned for repetition and being linear. Because other peoples opinions matter more than your own. Because reviews are facts. Because the large lack of variety in genres (mainstream) this gen had nothing to do with it. The lack of quality games also had nothing to do with it. A lot of reviewers though its concept was original, which is false. it barely improves from the first game at all. It still has the lack of precise control platforming. t ads Yoshi riding to gain nostalgia, which even reviewers state in their reviews. Fans of Mario will overhype every Mario game and defend them (Main series) ignoring a lot of flaws and slashing other games for having less of the same problems. If you had the same game, and replaces Mario, then it would get points lower. If the game was co-developed by Sega (they have worked with Nintendo games this gen and helped publish) it would probably lose points for not having original Mario appeal if Nintendo had made it. And it goes on. Nostalgia or Fanboyism for SMG2, choose one.Willy105
What logic or reasoning is there for thinking that if SMG2 was released in place of Sunshine, it would be panned for repetition and linearity? None. SMG2 coming out in 2002 would have been a far bigger deal than when SMG1 came out in 2007 (which won a ton of GOTY awards, including Gamespot's). It's like arguing that people from medieval times would not have been impressed by airplanes, since they are entitled to their opinion!
Also, variety in today's games have expanded exponentaly since the previous generation. From Wii to Kinect, DS to iPhone, indie games and casual games, diversity in games have exploded this gen. Sure, we still have games like Call of Duty this gen; but everything was like Call of Duty last gen.
Your view of Mario games and reviewers is warped and poor. If a Mario game came out without the Mario game, it would not have the hype it gets, therefore ending in people liking it a lot more. Because it has Mario in the title, it's harder for the game to be recieved well, because people always want to compare to their fantasy memories of how the old games were.
If Sega had made it, then it would probably wouldn't have been as good as if Nintendo made it, since Sega's devs are not as good developers as Nintendo's are.
Nostalgia or fanboyism for yourself, choose one or both.
No, because everything SMG 2 did that Sunshine did Sunshine was panned for. Most likely the stuff it did Sunshine didn't would have also gotten panned. Diversity? You mean going back in time? Mainstream wise, there is no variety, and there is large amount of repetition, the Indie and smaller devs mostly don;t take any risks and use old engines or make 8/16/32 bit games because people have nostalgia for games like that. Also, FMV type games are back as well as 3D which where both fads. You then act like Sega being worse than Nintendo is fact and not opinion, and no, in reality, removing Mario the games would be rated lower, period. Especially with the habit of ignoring flaws in games with mario in it, and panning similar games 300x for the same flaws even though they aren;t as bad. Also, you can tell your a hopeless fanboy by telling me to choose Nostalgia or fanboyism when you have no idea what my gaming preferences are. That's a run and hide tactic
Log in to comment