Mass Effect 3 Multiplayer Inadvertently Confirmed--Retailer Mentions Online Pass

  • 116 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for hanslacher54
hanslacher54

3659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 hanslacher54
Member since 2007 • 3659 Posts

[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]

:| Will definitely be sure to cancel my preorder next time I'm at GameStop. Way to ruin Mass Effect, EA. This series is officially dead to me now.

mrmusicman247

:lol: yeah i'm deffinietly not buying this game. On top of it not being an RPG, now they tack on MP AND Online passes (if the rumor is true) ? The_Pacific
Seriously? Seriously?

You don't have to play the multiplayer you know...

Dead Space 2 had tacked on multiplayer and it was still great.

Avatar image for peterw007
peterw007

3653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 peterw007
Member since 2005 • 3653 Posts

You don't have to play the multiplayer you know...

Dead Space 2 had tacked on multiplayer and it was still great.

hanslacher54

Bioshock 2 also had tacked-on multiplayer that detracted from the single-player elements.

The second game wasn't nearly as cohesive as the first...all because of unnecessary multiplayer siphoning away development focus.

ME is a single-player franchise. To switch now just doesn't make any sense.

Avatar image for Lord_Nas3k
Lord_Nas3k

1492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Lord_Nas3k
Member since 2006 • 1492 Posts

now the only thing left to do is strip out any remaining RPG elements and call it a dayFirebird-5

I thought they already did that with ME2.

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="hanslacher54"]

[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"] Seriously? Seriously? peterw007

You don't have to play the multiplayer you know...

Dead Space 2 had tacked on multiplayer and it was still great.

Bioshock 2 also had tacked-on multiplayer that detracted from the single-player elements.

The second game wasn't nearly as cohesive as the first...all because of unnecessary multiplayer siphoning away development costs.

ME is a single-player franchise. To switch now just doesn't make any sense.

It might be worse than it could have been. But it still might an extremely good game.
Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts

I'm totally serious. ME2 was pushing it on the TPS aspect. Now it seems mass effect 3 will just be a TPS with even lighter RPG gameplay. Plus if this rumor is true and they are adding MP I'm not wasting my time on it or their greedy, cash-in online passes. ME3 is the bi-product of EA's shady underhanded buisness practices and Bioware losing sight of the people that brought them to where they are (core, hardcore gamers). It's truly sad.The_Pacific

First off, you don't have play the multiplayer. Second, there have been videos showing some the RPG elements in the game. It seems like it will be more RPGish than ME2. So that argument goes out the window. What else ya got?

Avatar image for hanslacher54
hanslacher54

3659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 hanslacher54
Member since 2007 • 3659 Posts

Now it seems mass effect 3 will just be a TPS with even lighter RPG gameplay.The_Pacific

ME3 still won't be as much of a RPG as the original game was, but it will still have more RPG elements than ME2 had.

Avatar image for The_Pacific
The_Pacific

1804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 The_Pacific
Member since 2011 • 1804 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Pacific"]I'm totally serious. ME2 was pushing it on the TPS aspect. Now it seems mass effect 3 will just be a TPS with even lighter RPG gameplay. Plus if this rumor is true and they are adding MP I'm not wasting my time on it or their greedy, cash-in online passes. ME3 is the bi-product of EA's shady underhanded buisness practices and Bioware losing sight of the people that brought them to where they are (core, hardcore gamers). It's truly sad.mrmusicman247

First off, you don't have play the multiplayer. Second, there have been videos showing some the RPG elements in the game. It seems like it will be more RPGish than ME2. So that argument goes out the window. What else ya got?

I'm not going to play the MP, I don't support devs that put online passes in their games so thats another reason I wont be getting this (I thought I said that) And the RPG elements are piss poor at best. If I can beat ME2 with one weapon and not even bother customizing the character or ship than that tells me it aint a RPG. ME3 will follow in its path. Sorry my displeasure with ME3 offends you but its just my opinion.
Avatar image for Doolz2024
Doolz2024

9623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#58 Doolz2024
Member since 2007 • 9623 Posts

[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]

:| Will definitely be sure to cancel my preorder next time I'm at GameStop. Way to ruin Mass Effect, EA. This series is officially dead to me now.

mrmusicman247

:lol: yeah i'm deffinietly not buying this game. On top of it not being an RPG, now they tack on MP AND Online passes (if the rumor is true) ? The_Pacific
Seriously? Seriously?

Yes, I am serious.

Not like I'm gonna miss anything anyway. Plenty of other great games to keep me occupied in the coming months.

Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts

I'm not going to play the MP, I don't support devs that put online passes in their games so thats another reason I wont be getting this (I thought I said that) And the RPG elements are piss poor at best. If I can beat ME2 with one weapon and not even bother customizing the character or ship than that tells me it aint a RPG. ME3 will follow in its path. Sorry my displeasure with ME3 offends you but its just my opinion.The_Pacific

I don't give a damn that you don't like ME3. But if you dislike something for the wrong reasons, it just makes you look silly. And I'm all for silliness. Now I know ME2 wasn't much of an RPG. I said ME3 has shown videos that make it look like it's more RPGish than ME2. So that RPG argument goes out the window. Again. As far as not supporting online passes, buy the game used. That way you won't have to pay for the online pass.

Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts

Not like I'm gonna miss anything anyway. Plenty of other great games to keep me occupied in the coming months.

Doolz2024

I don't understand preordering a game and then cancelling the preorder over something trivial like this. Did you even want the game? If not, why did you preorder it?

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Pacific"][QUOTE="mrmusicman247"][QUOTE="Doolz2024"]
:lol: yeah i'm deffinietly not buying this game. On top of it not being an RPG, now they tack on MP AND Online passes (if the rumor is true) ? The_Pacific
Seriously? Seriously?

I'm totally serious. ME2 was pushing it on the TPS aspect. Now it seems mass effect 3 will just be a TPS with even lighter RPG gameplay. Plus if this rumor is true and they are adding MP I'm not wasting my time on it or their greedy, cash-in online passes. ME3 is the bi-product of EA's shady underhanded buisness practices and Bioware losing sight of the people that brought them to where they are (core, hardcore gamers). It's truly sad.

mass effect 3 is definatly going to have deeper rpg elements.
Avatar image for The_Pacific
The_Pacific

1804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 The_Pacific
Member since 2011 • 1804 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Pacific"]I'm not going to play the MP, I don't support devs that put online passes in their games so thats another reason I wont be getting this (I thought I said that) And the RPG elements are piss poor at best. If I can beat ME2 with one weapon and not even bother customizing the character or ship than that tells me it aint a RPG. ME3 will follow in its path. Sorry my displeasure with ME3 offends you but its just my opinion.mrmusicman247

I don't give a damn that you don't like ME3. But if you dislike something for the wrong reasons, it just makes you look silly. And I'm all for silliness. Now I know ME2 wasn't much of an RPG. I said ME3 has shown videos that make it look like it's more RPGish than ME2. So that RPG argument goes out the window. Again. As far as not supporting online passes, buy the game used. That way you won't have to pay for the online pass.

Not buying the game because it isn't an RPG sorry you can't accept that :lol:. Show me this video of its "rpg" aspect.
Avatar image for Doolz2024
Doolz2024

9623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#63 Doolz2024
Member since 2007 • 9623 Posts

[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]

Not like I'm gonna miss anything anyway. Plenty of other great games to keep me occupied in the coming months.

mrmusicman247

I don't understand preordering a game and then cancelling the preorder over something trivial like this. Did you even want the game? If not, why did you preorder it?

It's not trivial. It's EA ruining a series because they are greedy and think every game needs multiplayer. I won't support that. **** EA, and **** Mass Effect.

Avatar image for Vari3ty
Vari3ty

11111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Vari3ty
Member since 2009 • 11111 Posts

It's indeed weird how they put it as a bonus go collector edition, but theses kind of leaks are generally very precise. So I say there is a good chance ME3 will have a multiplayer, which is a good thing.

padaporra

I disagree completely. Mass Effect had no need of multiplayer, and it's going to feel tacked on, that's almost certain.

Avatar image for The_Pacific
The_Pacific

1804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 The_Pacific
Member since 2011 • 1804 Posts

[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"]

[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]

Not like I'm gonna miss anything anyway. Plenty of other great games to keep me occupied in the coming months.

Doolz2024

I don't understand preordering a game and then cancelling the preorder over something trivial like this. Did you even want the game? If not, why did you preorder it?

It's not trivial. It's EA ruining a series because they are greedy and think every game needs multiplayer. I won't support that. **** EA, and **** Mass Effect.

I don't get why the ME guys get some offended when someone doesn't wana by ME3. Its your money you can do whatever you want with it. I don't support what EA/Bioware is doing either so I'm not getting the 3rd one as well.
Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22680 Posts

[QUOTE="padaporra"]

It's indeed weird how they put it as a bonus go collector edition, but theses kind of leaks are generally very precise. So I say there is a good chance ME3 will have a multiplayer, which is a good thing.

Vari3ty

I disagree completely. Mass Effect had no need of multiplayer, and it's going to feel tacked on, that's almost certain.

As much of a Mass Effect fan I am. I'm disappointed to hear that ME3 will have some sort of multiplayer. The gameplay mechanics will feel weird if it's competitive. I knew the GameInformer info was too good to be true since some of the features and statements seem bogus at this point.

Well if it's co-op it might be fun for a while. I'd rather have all resources aimed for the single player.

Heartagram_03

Yeah totally agree with you guys.

I sincerely hope that the SP is in no way affected by the addition of MP. It drives me up the wall why developers feel the need to add on a MP component to games that don't need it. The Mass Effect games are a SP experience, gamers buy it for the SP experience. If you want to play MP, go and buy COD. You have to wonder if EA pushed Bioware into it... I can't imagine Bioware doing this.

Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts

Not buying the game because it isn't an RPG sorry you can't accept that :lol:. Show me this video of its "rpg" aspect.The_Pacific

Link

About 1:20 in.

Thread about powers

Avatar image for jamejame
jamejame

10634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 jamejame
Member since 2005 • 10634 Posts

[QUOTE="hanslacher54"]

You don't have to play the multiplayer you know...

Dead Space 2 had tacked on multiplayer and it was still great.

peterw007

Bioshock 2 also had tacked-on multiplayer that detracted from the single-player elements.

The second game wasn't nearly as cohesive as the first...all because of unnecessary multiplayer siphoning away development focus.

ME is a single-player franchise. To switch now just doesn't make any sense.

That's a plain lie. First of all,Bioshock 2was great and got glowing reviews. The only reason it wasn't reviewed as well as the first (barely) was because, well, it wasn't the first. Rapture was somewhat old the second time around. Second, an entirely different dev team worked on the multiplayer for the game (which was and is quite fun). Nothing was detracted from the SP as such.

Avatar image for Vari3ty
Vari3ty

11111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Vari3ty
Member since 2009 • 11111 Posts

[QUOTE="Vari3ty"]

[QUOTE="padaporra"]

I disagree completely. Mass Effect had no need of multiplayer, and it's going to feel tacked on, that's almost certain.

hrt_rulz01

As much of a Mass Effect fan I am. I'm disappointed to hear that ME3 will have some sort of multiplayer. The gameplay mechanics will feel weird if it's competitive. I knew the GameInformer info was too good to be true since some of the features and statements seem bogus at this point.

Well if it's co-op it might be fun for a while. I'd rather have all resources aimed for the single player.

Heartagram_03

Yeah totally agree with you guys.

I sincerely hope that the SP is in no way affected by the addition of MP. It drives me up the wall why developers feel the need to add on a MP component to games that don't need it. The Mass Effect games are a SP experience, gamers buy it for the SP experience. If you want to play MP, go and buy COD. You have to wonder if EA pushed Bioware into it... I can't imagine Bioware doing this.

Truly, why don't more devs get this I don't know. Unless you're one of the big name franchises like COD, Battlefield, Halo, etc., you may as well not even waste resources developing multiplayer.

Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts

[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"]

[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]

Not like I'm gonna miss anything anyway. Plenty of other great games to keep me occupied in the coming months.

Doolz2024

I don't understand preordering a game and then cancelling the preorder over something trivial like this. Did you even want the game? If not, why did you preorder it?

It's not trivial. It's EA ruining a series because they are greedy and think every game needs multiplayer. I won't support that. **** EA, and **** Mass Effect.

I was a fan of Uncharted. When they talked about adding multiplayer, I didn't want to believe it. However the when the game came out the multiplayer was actually decent. I was a fan of Assassin's Creed. When they talked about adding multiplayer. I didn't want to believe it. However, the multiplauer was actually decent. Now I'm not saying every game needs multiplayer. All I'm saying is EA isn't the only one adding multiplayer to games.
Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts

Kinect I can understand because I am sure Microsoft gave them some kind of benefit for adding that in

co-op is fine, online multiplayer is not, that only means they used resources to put in a product that will be dead on arrival(see bioshock 2)

I rather they have focused on single player

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

Kinect I can understand because I am sure Microsoft gave them some kind of benefit for adding that in

co-op is fine, online multiplayer is not, that only means they used resources to put in a product that will be dead on arrival(see bioshock 2)

I rather they have focused on single player

fueled-system
They probably got extra funding for multiplayer.
Avatar image for The_Pacific
The_Pacific

1804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 The_Pacific
Member since 2011 • 1804 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Pacific"]Not buying the game because it isn't an RPG sorry you can't accept that :lol:. Show me this video of its "rpg" aspect.mrmusicman247

Link

About 1:20 in.

Thread about powers

Weapon mods :|

And more combat evolves ? How is that giving me more in line with ME1 ?? They expanded the upgrades is all.

Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts

[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"]

[QUOTE="The_Pacific"]Not buying the game because it isn't an RPG sorry you can't accept that :lol:. Show me this video of its "rpg" aspect.The_Pacific

Link

About 1:20 in.

Thread about powers

Weapon mods :|

And more combat evolves ? How is that giving me more in line with ME1 ?? They expanded the upgrades is all.

I never said it was going to be more like ME1.
Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts

[QUOTE="fueled-system"]

Kinect I can understand because I am sure Microsoft gave them some kind of benefit for adding that in

co-op is fine, online multiplayer is not, that only means they used resources to put in a product that will be dead on arrival(see bioshock 2)

I rather they have focused on single player

dkdk999

They probably got extra funding for multiplayer.

I doubt Microsoft/Sony would fund what they know will be dead content unless its only co-op which it probably wont be

Avatar image for The_Pacific
The_Pacific

1804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 The_Pacific
Member since 2011 • 1804 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Pacific"]

[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"]

Link

About 1:20 in.

Thread about powers

mrmusicman247

Weapon mods :|

And more combat evolves ? How is that giving me more in line with ME1 ?? They expanded the upgrades is all.

I never said it was going to be more like ME1.

But this is definitively not the "RPG" I was expecting. This is more than ME2 yes but thats not a good thing. I bet I can power through this game, with one weapon and no customization just like I did on ME2. I wont be missing much not buying this TPS. I'll stick with SKYRIM if I want an RPG this holiday
Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts

But this is definitively not the "RPG" I was expecting. This is more than ME2 yes but thats not a good thing. I bet I can power through this game, with one weapon and no customization just like I did on ME2. I wont be missing much not buying this TPS. I'll stick with SKYRIM if I want an RPG this holidayThe_Pacific

Sure, sure.

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="fueled-system"]

Kinect I can understand because I am sure Microsoft gave them some kind of benefit for adding that in

co-op is fine, online multiplayer is not, that only means they used resources to put in a product that will be dead on arrival(see bioshock 2)

I rather they have focused on single player

fueled-system

They probably got extra funding for multiplayer.

I doubt Microsoft/Sony would fund what they know will be dead content unless its only co-op which it probably wont be

why won't it probably be coop ? And I'm saying EA is willing to pay them more if they make it multiplayer.
Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts

[QUOTE="fueled-system"]

[QUOTE="dkdk999"] They probably got extra funding for multiplayer. dkdk999

I doubt Microsoft/Sony would fund what they know will be dead content unless its only co-op which it probably wont be

why won't it probably be coop ? And I'm saying EA is willing to pay them more if they make it multiplayer.

EA is money first, they are designed to know what will make money, multiplayer does not always make money.

Bioshock is proof multiplayer does not always work/sell

EA would want a focus on if anything co-op because they know co-op would be reasonable to the mass effect universe and multiplayer would not

Avatar image for padaporra
padaporra

3508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 padaporra
Member since 2005 • 3508 Posts

Incredible how ME (especially since ME2) is so far ahead of its time that people can't even tell what genre it is.

Avatar image for peterw007
peterw007

3653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 peterw007
Member since 2005 • 3653 Posts

Incredible how ME (especially since ME2) is so far ahead of its time that people can't even tell what genre it is.

padaporra

It's a slightly interactive TPS with fancy powers.

Let's not kid ourselves here.

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="fueled-system"]I doubt Microsoft/Sony would fund what they know will be dead content unless its only co-op which it probably wont be

fueled-system

why won't it probably be coop ? And I'm saying EA is willing to pay them more if they make it multiplayer.

EA is money first, they are designed to know what will make money, multiplayer does not always make money.

Bioshock is proof multiplayer does not always work/sell

EA would want a focus on if anything co-op because they know co-op would be reasonable to the mass effect universe and multiplayer would not

http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2010/12/ea-single-player/

I'm pretty sure it's common knowledge at this point that EA believes only games with multiplayer components can be successful and are going to try to do everything in their power to make their games multiplayer. I find it odd you thought a publisher was more rational than a developer.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#83 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
The fact that they most likely delayed the game JUST to put multiplayer really bothers me.
Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts
The fact that they most likely delayed the game JUST to put multiplayer really bothers me.lawlessx
Me too. Makes me kind of mad really. Though I guess theres plenty of games to play this fall already.
Avatar image for 001011000101101
001011000101101

4395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 337

User Lists: 0

#85 001011000101101
Member since 2008 • 4395 Posts
Is it really that hard for Bioware to understand that people want a good SINGLEPLAYER GAME?! We want an ending to the trilogy! Not some half assed multiplayer mode! ****!
Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#86 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
[QUOTE="lawlessx"]The fact that they most likely delayed the game JUST to put multiplayer really bothers me.dkdk999
Me too. Makes me kind of mad really. Though I guess theres plenty of games to play this fall already.

It make's me feel like like they're not treating the game with passion and heart and more of an cashcow.. saw that pretty clear in Mass Effect 2
Avatar image for peterw007
peterw007

3653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 peterw007
Member since 2005 • 3653 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="lawlessx"]The fact that they most likely delayed the game JUST to put multiplayer really bothers me.lawlessx
Me too. Makes me kind of mad really. Though I guess theres plenty of games to play this fall already.

It make's me feel like like they're not treating the game with passion and heart and more of an cashcow.. saw that pretty clear in Mass Effect 2

It'll become more evident when they make Mass Effect 4, Mass Effect 5, Mass Effect 6, etc.

Avatar image for Kickinurass
Kickinurass

3357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Kickinurass
Member since 2005 • 3357 Posts

Is it really that hard for Bioware to understand that people want a good SINGLEPLAYER GAME?! We want an ending to the trilogy! Not some half assed multiplayer mode! ****!001011000101101

Speak for yourself.

[QUOTE="lawlessx"]The fact that they most likely delayed the game JUST to put multiplayer really bothers me.dkdk999
Me too. Makes me kind of mad really. Though I guess theres plenty of games to play this fall already.

At least Bioware is adding something tangible to the game, unlike in Batman AC where the delay is touch up particle effects and add other useless Physx based junk.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#89 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

[QUOTE="001011000101101"]

Speak for yourself.

[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="lawlessx"]The fact that they most likely delayed the game JUST to put multiplayer really bothers me.Kickinurass

Me too. Makes me kind of mad really. Though I guess theres plenty of games to play this fall already.

At least Bioware is adding something tangible to the game, unlike in Batman AC where the delay is touch up particle effects and add other useless Physx based junk.

Because you think they should add even more stuff in the PC version because it was delayed a month?

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts
[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="lawlessx"]The fact that they most likely delayed the game JUST to put multiplayer really bothers me.lawlessx
Me too. Makes me kind of mad really. Though I guess theres plenty of games to play this fall already.

It make's me feel like like they're not treating the game with passion and heart and more of an cashcow.. saw that pretty clear in Mass Effect 2

I'm not with you there. ME 2 was one of my favorite games of all time. I can play it all day and not get tired of it.
Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#91 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="dkdk999"] Me too. Makes me kind of mad really. Though I guess theres plenty of games to play this fall already. dkdk999
It make's me feel like like they're not treating the game with passion and heart and more of an cashcow.. saw that pretty clear in Mass Effect 2

I'm not with you there. ME 2 was one of my favorite games of all time. I can play it all day and not get tired of it.

Didn't say mass effect 2 wasn't a good game,but for me i felt the first mass effect had alot more going for it.
Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#93 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

If they put deathmatch multiplayer Mass Effect is ruined but they could make it work with co-op multiplayer even though i am still not sure.

[deleted]
My money is on 2v2 deathmatch.
Avatar image for xCocoTheMonkeyx
xCocoTheMonkeyx

425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 xCocoTheMonkeyx
Member since 2011 • 425 Posts
I don't understand why put multiplayer in Mass Effect it just doesn't go at all
Avatar image for spookykid143
spookykid143

10393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 spookykid143
Member since 2009 • 10393 Posts

Incredible how ME (especially since ME2) is so far ahead of its time that people can't even tell what genre it is.

padaporra

ahead of its time? it's a TPS with dialogue choices:?

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#96 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

[QUOTE="padaporra"]

Incredible how ME (especially since ME2) is so far ahead of its time that people can't even tell what genre it is.

spookykid143

ahead of its time? it's a TPS with dialogue choices:?

maybe he didn't play kotor?
Avatar image for LORD_BLACKGULT
LORD_BLACKGULT

947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 LORD_BLACKGULT
Member since 2006 • 947 Posts

An why does every single game these days NEED a multiplayer mode? But hey, lets add multiplayer to a singleplayer-centric game! And in 10 years, the MP won't even work for the most part. Funny how that works.

Avatar image for peterw007
peterw007

3653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 peterw007
Member since 2005 • 3653 Posts

An why does every single game these days NEED a multiplayer mode? But hey, lets add multiplayer to a singleplayer-centric game! And in 10 years, the MP won't even work for the most part. Funny how that works.

LORD_BLACKGULT

Online multiplayer is the most useless thing ever to plague gaming.

It's only usable for at the very most 10 years.

What good is that? It's just a waste of everybody's time to develop gameplay components that last only 5-10 years at most.

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#99 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

Co-op campaign sounds like a terrible idea. People like to complain that multiplayer can possibly destroy a good single player experience. That really makes no sense sense, they are two completely different features that don't connect well at all. Co-op and single player go better together, but its obvious that that would have to sacrifice a lot of things to get the co-op to work in a single player based storyline.

Avatar image for TheShadowLord07
TheShadowLord07

23083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 TheShadowLord07
Member since 2006 • 23083 Posts

im still hoping for a gear of war like horde. im pretty sure that work