Microsoft/Nintendo/Sony - June-Sept 2011 - Earnings Results

that will never happen and thats extremely hypothetical when that does happen you will have anarguement but once a new gen start the old won places should as well its just going to create more confusion and loopholes on here

Mario1331

What I'm stating mimics actual generations, it doesn't create any loopholes. It follows logic.

A new generation starts when a new generation of consoles is "born." That doesn't mean the older generation stops existing. An old generation dies when it's consoles die - i.e. are discontinued.

That's how generations work, just as in life, they overlap and they're independent.

[QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

well thats fine IF the gen doesnt really end but the places of whoever was in 1st 2nd and 3rd should end

Mario1331

The generations are entirely independent of each other, and a new one doesn't necessitate the old one dying off.

Here's a hypothetical:

Nintendo release a WiiU in 2012, it sells 10 million its first year, 5 million in 2013, for a total of 15 million, by the end of 2013.

Microsoft release a 720 a year later, it sells 10 million its first year (2013), 10 million the next (2014), for a total of 20 million and keeps on selling.

Sony release a PS4 in 2014, it sells 15 million its first year and keeps on selling.

The WiiU2 is released in 2014. The WiiU is the best selling console of the eigth generation?

It doesn't make any sense.

that will never happen and thats extremely hypothetical when that does happen you will have anarguement but once a new gen start the old won places should as well its just going to create more confusion and loopholes on here

The fact that you don't know of innovative companies does not mean they don't exist, it just means you can't think of any. It is a limitation on your part.

kuu2

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

that will never happen and thats extremely hypothetical when that does happen you will have anarguement but once a new gen start the old won places should as well its just going to create more confusion and loopholes on here

shinrabanshou

What I'm stating mimics actual generations, it doesn't create any loopholes. It follows logic.

A new generation starts when a new generation of consoles is "born." That doesn't mean the older generation stops existing. An old generation dies when it's consoles die - i.e. are discontinued.

That's how generations work, just as in life, they overlap and they're independent.

i dont agree but ok i understand your point

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]I don't see why.

The generations are entirely independent of each other, and a new one doesn't necessitate the old one dying off.

Here's a hypothetical:

Nintendo release a WiiU in 2012, it sells 10 million its first year, 5 million in 2013, for a total of 15 million, by the end of 2013.

Microsoft release a 720 a year later, it sells 10 million its first year (2013), 10 million the next (2014), for a total of 20 million and keeps on selling.

Sony release a PS4 in 2014, it sells 15 million its first year and keeps on selling.

The WiiU2 is released in 2014. The WiiU is the best selling console of the eigth generation?

It doesn't make any sense.

ianuilliam

that will never happen and thats extremely hypothetical when that does happen you will have anarguement but once a new gen start the old won places should as well its just going to create more confusion and loopholes on here

i dont agree but we just going to have to agree to disagree

I don't have to name anything based on your definition of what is innovative and for the "good" of humanity. If you choose to see something that does not exist that is your choice. I can't and won't be able to change your vision no matter what I say. You have to change your vision but it takes you adimitting that you are wrong to do it.

kuu2

I stated that that essentially descibes pretty much every company or conglomerates, which to some degree it does. And that you'd be hard pressed to find the opposite - a company that makes fantastically innovative wares and sells them for a pittance. You said such companies exist - so feel free to provide examples as proof positive.

Corporations derivate from others. And they iteratively improve on innovation long past. "Innovation" does exist, but not nearly to the degree that people harp on about all the time.

I have no idea what the rest of your Deepak Chopra is supposed to mean.