Min specs for Crysis: Warhead.

look what I found

http://www.gamespot.com/video/946793/6195788/crysis-warhead-official-trailer-1

blackdreamhunk

that trailer is for crysis wars, not crtysis warhead. they are two completely different games as are crysis annihilation and world in crysis. judging by the crysis wars video that you posted, it looks like a multiplayer ut3 s-t-y-l-e game, not a single player game like crysis or crysis warhead. nice video by the way.

edit:

damnit GS, way is the word s-t-y-l-e considered an offensive/banned word?

[QUOTE="blackdreamhunk"]

look what I found

http://www.gamespot.com/video/946793/6195788/crysis-warhead-official-trailer-1

cowgriller

that trailer is for crysis wars, not crtysis warhead. they are two completely different games as are crysis annihilation and world in crysis. judging by the crysis wars video that you posted, it looks like a multiplayer ut3 s-t-y-l-e game, not a single player game like crysis or crysis warhead. nice video by the way.

edit:

damnit GS, way is the word s-t-y-l-e considered an offensive/banned word?

That is the updated multiplayer component to Warhead and Crysis.

well i hope its optimised well for crossfire coz crysis isnt and the difference between a single 4850 and 4850CF is not that much :(anshul89

What? I got an extra 10-15 fps when crossfiring the 4850 and that is a big boost for Crysis

*hugs 9800gtx oc'd* Lemmywinks_360

*Stares jealously at lemmywinkses 9800gtx*

*Cries at thought of P4 1.8 GHz, 512MB RAM, and 6400GT*

that is eaxtly same as my 5-6 years old pc (excpet the ram)naval

What!? My pc new in 2006 can't run it, thats crazy, what were the specs? Btw my comp is p4 3.00GHz, 1GB RAM and a 128mb intel integrated craphole. I'm actually upgrading to 2GB ram and a 8600gt just for spore and others

I think I'll be running this game on medium.

Well actually i won't becuase I'm not geting it anyway.

Is it me or a 9800Pro is a lot less powerful than a 6800GT?

Because wasn't the X800 series competing against 6800 series?

[QUOTE="naval"]that is eaxtly same as my 5-6 years old pc (excpet the ram)demon790

What!? My pc new in 2006 can't run it, thats crazy, what were the specs? Btw my comp is p4 3.00GHz, 1GB RAM and a 128mb intel integrated craphole. I'm actually upgrading to 2GB ram and a 8600gt just for spore and others

p4 3GHZ, 512 MB Ram, 9800pro. so yeah if you perform the upgrades you should be fine, but i think there are lot more better options than 8600GT

[QUOTE="cowgriller"][QUOTE="blackdreamhunk"]

look what I found

http://www.gamespot.com/video/946793/6195788/crysis-warhead-official-trailer-1

skrat_01

that trailer is for crysis wars, not crtysis warhead. they are two completely different games as are crysis annihilation and world in crysis. judging by the crysis wars video that you posted, it looks like a multiplayer ut3 s-t-y-l-e game, not a single player game like crysis or crysis warhead. nice video by the way.

edit:

damnit GS, way is the word s-t-y-l-e considered an offensive/banned word?

That is the updated multiplayer component to Warhead and Crysis.

and the multiplayer component is named Crysis war I think

I'm interested to see whether this installment really is more refined than the unoptimized mess the first one was. Kudos to Crytek if so, but I doubt they'll be able to achieve a level of user-friendlyness akin to, say, Half-Life 2 and Far Cry 2.Verge_6

Far Cry 2 isn't even released yet, and I don't think it would be that much better optimized that Crysis anyway, since its Ubisoft.

Unless you are from the future and have a copy of it >_>

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]I'm interested to see whether this installment really is more refined than the unoptimized mess the first one was. Kudos to Crytek if so, but I doubt they'll be able to achieve a level of user-friendlyness akin to, say, Half-Life 2 and Far Cry 2.Lonelynight

Far Cry 2 isn't even released yet, and I don't think it would be that much better optimized that Crysis anyway, since its Ubisoft.

Unless you are from the future and have a copy of it >_>

You haven't seen the leaked specs?

I could run Crysis VERY HIGH DX10 no AA 1650x1080 at 20-40 FPS.

I can't wait to play this!

It's so good to be a PC gamer right now.Bentham

actually its pretty expensive being a PC gamer now. Back in the days, it was easy being a PC gamer. Nowadays.....omg.

those specs to play a game that looks like far cry 1AtrumRegina

Right...

Maybe you should get your eyes/brain checked.

[QUOTE="Lonelynight"]

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]I'm interested to see whether this installment really is more refined than the unoptimized mess the first one was. Kudos to Crytek if so, but I doubt they'll be able to achieve a level of user-friendlyness akin to, say, Half-Life 2 and Far Cry 2.Verge_6

Far Cry 2 isn't even released yet, and I don't think it would be that much better optimized that Crysis anyway, since its Ubisoft.

Unless you are from the future and have a copy of it >_>

You haven't seen the leaked specs?

I don't think spec matters really much, its best to judge the optimization when they release a demo, also the requirement for Far Cry 2 isn't that much different than Crysis Warheads, its even higher than Warhead if I'm not mistaken.

[QUOTE="Bentham"]It's so good to be a PC gamer right now.r_gam3

actually its pretty expensive being a PC gamer now. Back in the days, it was easy being a PC gamer. Nowadays.....omg.

I don't think spec matters really much, its best to judge the optimization when they release a demo, also the requirement for Far Cry 2 isn't that much different than Crysis Warheads, its even higher than Warhead if I'm not mistaken.

Lonelynight

Yes. playing demos is the best method for determining optimization, but I think specs certainly say alot for it when the recommended setup includes a 8600GT GPU. You know, the crappy, media-focused red headed step-child of the 8800.

When were the rec. specs for Warhead released?

I'm interested to see whether this installment really is more refined than the unoptimized mess the first one was. Kudos to Crytek if so, but I doubt they'll be able to achieve a level of user-friendlyness akin to, say, Half-Life 2 and Far Cry 2.Verge_6

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]I'm interested to see whether this installment really is more refined than the unoptimized mess the first one was. Kudos to Crytek if so, but I doubt they'll be able to achieve a level of user-friendlyness akin to, say, Half-Life 2 and Far Cry 2.Vandalvideo

Again, when were the rec. specs for Warhead released? Serious question, as I have yet to see them.

I know it was released four years ago, and even back then people were amazed at how hardware-friendly it was. That was my point.

[QUOTE="Lonelynight"]

I don't think spec matters really much, its best to judge the optimization when they release a demo, also the requirement for Far Cry 2 isn't that much different than Crysis Warheads, its even higher than Warhead if I'm not mistaken.

Verge_6

Yes. playing demos is the best method for determining optimization, but I think specs certainly say alot for it when the recommended setup includes a 8600GT GPU. You know, the crappy, media-focused red headed step-child of the 8800.

When were the rec. specs for Warhead released?

Its not release yet I think.

And I think its best not to judge their optimization just from the SQ, since most companies like to twist the truth.

[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="Lonelynight"]

I don't think spec matters really much, its best to judge the optimization when they release a demo, also the requirement for Far Cry 2 isn't that much different than Crysis Warheads, its even higher than Warhead if I'm not mistaken.

Lonelynight

Yes. playing demos is the best method for determining optimization, but I think specs certainly say alot for it when the recommended setup includes a 8600GT GPU. You know, the crappy, media-focused red headed step-child of the 8800.

When were the rec. specs for Warhead released?

Its not release yet I think.

And I think its best not to judge their optimization just from the SQ, since most companies like to twist the truth.

Dunno about that, seeing as the specs for a certain multiplat title were incredibly high, and the game was so unoptimized it made babies cry around the world.

Dunno about that, seeing as the specs for a certain multiplat title were incredibly high, and the game was so unoptimized it made babies cry around the world.Verge_6

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]Dunno about that, seeing as the specs for a certain multiplat title were incredibly high, and the game was so unoptimized it made babies cry around the world.Vandalvideo

I know that, my point was that specs CAN reflect the optmization of a game. And again, what are these rec. specs that have been mentioned...three times now?

I know that, my point was that specs CAN reflect the optmization of a game. Verge_6

Dunno about that, seeing as the specs for a certain multiplat title were incredibly high, and the game was so unoptimized it made babies cry around the world.

Verge_6

Notice I said most

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]I know that, my point was that specs CAN reflect the optmization of a game. Vandalvideo

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]

Dunno about that, seeing as the specs for a certain multiplat title were incredibly high, and the game was so unoptimized it made babies cry around the world.

Lonelynight

Notice I said most

I know, just throwing an occurance of specs reflecting optimization out there, is all.

[Medium-high, which has been the standard for 'recommended', I would assume. :?Verge_6

[QUOTE="Verge_6"][Medium-high, which has been the standard for 'recommended', I would assume. :?Vandalvideo

Great, but I wasn't denying that Warhead would be more optmized....

[QUOTE="Lemmywinks_360"]*hugs 9800gtx oc'd* KOTORkicker

*Stares jealously at lemmywinkses 9800gtx*

*Cries at thought of P4 1.8 GHz, 512MB RAM, and 6400GT*

Its not that bad. You could run..................fallout, or buldur's gate

I have a 6600gt :cry:DivergeUnify

[QUOTE="KOTORkicker"]

[QUOTE="Lemmywinks_360"]*hugs 9800gtx oc'd* Lemmywinks_360

*Stares jealously at lemmywinkses 9800gtx*

*Cries at thought of P4 1.8 GHz, 512MB RAM, and 6400GT*

Its not that bad. You could run..................fallout, or buldur's gate

Or, hey, maybe Everquest...maybe. :P

Wow, this is making my OC'd EVGA 8800GS look good.

I have a 6600gt :cry:DivergeUnify

6600gt was the best bang for buck card I had ever seen back in the day. I loved mine. ;)

[QUOTE="DivergeUnify"]I have a 6600gt :cry:Wartzay

6600gt was the best bang for buck card I had ever seen back in the day. I loved mine. ;)

Mine too but too bad it died out. Now I'm using a 7600GT.

*Looks at PC* :? Failed.waynehead895

when you looked at your pc, did it look anything like this?

j/k:P. my pc is able to run the game at medium.

I was able to get Crysis running on high. Since this is more optimized I'll be more satisfied.

But I'm still not sure whether to buy it or not.

Low graphical detail with crappy hardware = Confirmed...Arnalion

Wait... what about my 6800 GS? :?organic_machine

Alright, I am safe. My 6800 GS was designed after (and improved upon) the GT, not before.