Misconceptions against Super Mario Galaxy

[QUOTE="Willy105"]

I forgot to add the soundtrack!

Sorry.

It's up there now!

Now you can see BRAND NEW and NEVER BEFORE HEARD Mario tunes.

legend26

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!I thought i was the only one who felt that way...Space Junk Galaxy and Gusty Garden Galaxy best music ever!!

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]

The funniest thing about the haters is when they bash the story :lol:

And this thread is full of win and truth.

beast667

Mario galaxy has great gameplay. But the graphics are crap to compare to 360 0s3 and pc. There is no denying this. You can't actually believe that Mario has graphics that rival any of the 360 ps3 and pc games this gen. You just can't believe. I don't care so much of a fanboy you are, you can't deny the wii is the worst console for graphics. The hardware is not on the level of the 360 ps3 and pc. If the wii hardware is inferior to the rest of the consoleshow can any game on the wii have great graphics? Mario galaxy is the best looking game on the wii that is it. Is not the best looking game anywhere else.

You may say that the art is great but that subjective. I don't understand how a game that uses primary colors be called artistic. The texture in galaxy has to the most basic texture in any game this Gen. What game has worst texture then this game? OTHER WII GAMES!!! I much rather look at HL2, any sport game. Even RC has better art direction.

I won't deny that Mario Galaxy is a great for some of you. But don't let those fanboy goggles blind you. Mario has WII great graphics that is!

efd753

But SMG won Best Graphics- Artisitic , out of any game this year...

Dont forget it also won Game of the Year...

Are GS editors a bunch of fanboys too..

[QUOTE="legend26"][QUOTE="Willy105"]

I forgot to add the soundtrack!

Sorry.

It's up there now!

Now you can see BRAND NEW and NEVER BEFORE HEARD Mario tunes.

Willy105

You mean this one?

[QUOTE="legend26"][QUOTE="Willy105"]

I forgot to add the soundtrack!

Sorry.

It's up there now!

Now you can see BRAND NEW and NEVER BEFORE HEARD Mario tunes.

fitzokoli

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!I thought i was the only one who felt that way...Space Junk Galaxy and Gusty Garden Galaxy best music ever!!

[QUOTE="legend26"][QUOTE="Willy105"]

I forgot to add the soundtrack!

Sorry.

It's up there now!

Now you can see BRAND NEW and NEVER BEFORE HEARD Mario tunes.

fitzokoli

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!I thought i was the only one who felt that way...Space Junk Galaxy and Gusty Garden Galaxy best music ever!!

I like Gusty Garden Galaxy's music but my favorite Galaxy is FreezeFlame Galaxy.Nintendo_Ownes7

Mario galaxy has great gameplay. But the graphics are crap to compare to 360 0s3 and pc. There is no denying this. You can't actually believe that Mario has graphics that rival any of the 360 ps3 and pc games this gen. You just can't believe. I don't care so much of a fanboy you are, you can't deny the wii is the worst console for graphics. The hardware is not on the level of the 360 ps3 and pc. If the wii hardware is inferior to the rest of the consoleshow can any game on the wii have great graphics? Mario galaxy is the best looking game on the wii that is it. Is not the best looking game anywhere else.

You may say that the art is great but that subjective. I don't understand how a game that uses primary colors be called artistic. The texture in galaxy has to the most basic texture in any game this Gen. What game has worst texture then this game? OTHER WII GAMES!!! I much rather look at HL2, any sport game. Even RC has better art direction.

I won't deny that Mario Galaxy is a great for some of you. But don't let those fanboy goggles blind you. Mario has WII great graphics that is!

efd753

[QUOTE="efd753"]

Mario galaxy has great gameplay. But the graphics are crap to compare to 360 0s3 and pc. There is no denying this. You can't actually believe that Mario has graphics that rival any of the 360 ps3 and pc games this gen. You just can't believe. I don't care so much of a fanboy you are, you can't deny the wii is the worst console for graphics. The hardware is not on the level of the 360 ps3 and pc. If the wii hardware is inferior to the rest of the consoleshow can any game on the wii have great graphics? Mario galaxy is the best looking game on the wii that is it. Is not the best looking game anywhere else.

You may say that the art is great but that subjective. I don't understand how a game that uses primary colors be called artistic. The texture in galaxy has to the most basic texture in any game this Gen. What game has worst texture then this game? OTHER WII GAMES!!! I much rather look at HL2, any sport game. Even RC has better art direction.

I won't deny that Mario Galaxy is a great for some of you. But don't let those fanboy goggles blind you. Mario has WII great graphics that is!

fitzokoli

But SMG won Best Graphics- Artisitic , out of any game this year...

Dont forget it also won Game of the Year...

Are GS editors a bunch of fanboys too..

Like i said artistic is subjective.Im arguing the point where the TC says that Mario Galaxy have great graphics is doesn't.

Mario galaxy has great gameplay. But the graphics are crap to compare to 360 0s3 and pc. There is no denying this. You can't actually believe that Mario has graphics that rival any of the 360 ps3 and pc games this gen. You just can't believe. I don't care so much of a fanboy you are, you can't deny the wii is the worst console for graphics. The hardware is not on the level of the 360 ps3 and pc. If the wii hardware is inferior to the rest of the consoleshow can any game on the wii have great graphics? Mario galaxy is the best looking game on the wii that is it. Is not the best looking game anywhere else.

You may say that the art is great but that subjective. I don't understand how a game that uses primary colors be called artistic. The texture in galaxy has to the most basic texture in any game this Gen. What game has worst texture then this game? OTHER WII GAMES!!! I much rather look at HL2, any sport game. Even RC has better art direction.

I won't deny that Mario Galaxy is a great for some of you. But don't let those fanboy goggles blind you. Mario has WII great graphics that is!

efd753

I agree with most everything you said except for this:
"4. No clipping."

Every game has clipping, and I noticed it a few times when playing Super Mario Galaxy.

[QUOTE="fitzokoli"][QUOTE="legend26"][QUOTE="Willy105"]

I forgot to add the soundtrack!

Sorry.

It's up there now!

Now you can see BRAND NEW and NEVER BEFORE HEARD Mario tunes.

Nintendo_Ownes7

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!I thought i was the only one who felt that way...Space Junk Galaxy and Gusty Garden Galaxy best music ever!!

It might seem like i'm saying it just to say it but actually thats my third fav after Space junk and gusty garden...Especially the music after you launch from the little ring you land on onto the main planet...

[QUOTE="efd753"]

Mario galaxy has great gameplay. But the graphics are crap to compare to 360 0s3 and pc. There is no denying this. You can't actually believe that Mario has graphics that rival any of the 360 ps3 and pc games this gen. You just can't believe. I don't care so much of a fanboy you are, you can't deny the wii is the worst console for graphics. The hardware is not on the level of the 360 ps3 and pc. If the wii hardware is inferior to the rest of the consoleshow can any game on the wii have great graphics? Mario galaxy is the best looking game on the wii that is it. Is not the best looking game anywhere else.

You may say that the art is great but that subjective. I don't understand how a game that uses primary colors be called artistic. The texture in galaxy has to the most basic texture in any game this Gen. What game has worst texture then this game? OTHER WII GAMES!!! I much rather look at HL2, any sport game. Even RC has better art direction.

I won't deny that Mario Galaxy is a great for some of you. But don't let those fanboy goggles blind you. Mario has WII great graphics that is!

legend26

I didnt say the game was bad. Im arguing the point where the TC said mario galaxy has great graphic. I thought is was well known thethe wii is the worst console for graphics. Is the former statement is true then how in the world of logic and reasoning(I know this SW) can any game on the wii have great graphics.

[QUOTE="Exeed_Orbit"]I agree with most of what you said, except for the music part. I played it at a friend's house, and I noticed a few old school songs (remade of course) from the earlier mario games. Not that it was a bad thing, it was actually quite refreshing to tell you the truth. It was a really fun game to play altogether. It felt intuitive and using the Wii mote wasn't a hassle at all.Willy105

Like I said, a few old themes were put in the game.

But most of them are brand new.

Come see for yourself.

Also for the most part i think the remixed old tunes were used on "bonus" galaxies..Galaxies you got after feeding hungry luma's..Most of the main stages use all new music...

I love SMG, but most of your points were opinions...Big_Red_Button

Every single one of them was opinion.

"Saying it does not have a story proves your complete ignorance." No. That is a completely true statement. To call someone ignorant for making a true statement is fanboyism, nothing else. The TC did not make an objective post, he made a subjective post and people are making it out to be fact. For example, having shaders and running at 60 FPS does not mean a game has good graphics. I can run a 2d flash game at 60 FPS, that does not mean it has graphics comparable to Crysis (or even other console games).

[QUOTE="legend26"][QUOTE="efd753"]

Mario galaxy has great gameplay. But the graphics are crap to compare to 360 0s3 and pc. There is no denying this. You can't actually believe that Mario has graphics that rival any of the 360 ps3 and pc games this gen. You just can't believe. I don't care so much of a fanboy you are, you can't deny the wii is the worst console for graphics. The hardware is not on the level of the 360 ps3 and pc. If the wii hardware is inferior to the rest of the consoleshow can any game on the wii have great graphics? Mario galaxy is the best looking game on the wii that is it. Is not the best looking game anywhere else.

You may say that the art is great but that subjective. I don't understand how a game that uses primary colors be called artistic. The texture in galaxy has to the most basic texture in any game this Gen. What game has worst texture then this game? OTHER WII GAMES!!! I much rather look at HL2, any sport game. Even RC has better art direction.

I won't deny that Mario Galaxy is a great for some of you. But don't let those fanboy goggles blind you. Mario has WII great graphics that is!

efd753

I didnt say the game was bad. Im arguing the point where the TC said mario galaxy has great graphic. I thought is was well known thethe wii is the worst console for graphics. Is the former statement is true then how in the world of logic and reasoning(I know this SW) can any game on the wii have great graphics.

[QUOTE="fitzokoli"][QUOTE="efd753"]

Mario galaxy has great gameplay. But the graphics are crap to compare to 360 0s3 and pc. There is no denying this. You can't actually believe that Mario has graphics that rival any of the 360 ps3 and pc games this gen. You just can't believe. I don't care so much of a fanboy you are, you can't deny the wii is the worst console for graphics. The hardware is not on the level of the 360 ps3 and pc. If the wii hardware is inferior to the rest of the consoleshow can any game on the wii have great graphics? Mario galaxy is the best looking game on the wii that is it. Is not the best looking game anywhere else.

You may say that the art is great but that subjective. I don't understand how a game that uses primary colors be called artistic. The texture in galaxy has to the most basic texture in any game this Gen. What game has worst texture then this game? OTHER WII GAMES!!! I much rather look at HL2, any sport game. Even RC has better art direction.

I won't deny that Mario Galaxy is a great for some of you. But don't let those fanboy goggles blind you. Mario has WII great graphics that is!

efd753

But SMG won Best Graphics- Artisitic , out of any game this year...

Dont forget it also won Game of the Year...

Are GS editors a bunch of fanboys too..

Like i said artistic is subjective.Im arguing the point where the TC says that Mario Galaxy have great graphics is doesn't.

I guess that's subjective too?

[QUOTE="efd753"][QUOTE="fitzokoli"][QUOTE="efd753"]

Mario galaxy has great gameplay. But the graphics are crap to compare to 360 0s3 and pc. There is no denying this. You can't actually believe that Mario has graphics that rival any of the 360 ps3 and pc games this gen. You just can't believe. I don't care so much of a fanboy you are, you can't deny the wii is the worst console for graphics. The hardware is not on the level of the 360 ps3 and pc. If the wii hardware is inferior to the rest of the consoleshow can any game on the wii have great graphics? Mario galaxy is the best looking game on the wii that is it. Is not the best looking game anywhere else.

You may say that the art is great but that subjective. I don't understand how a game that uses primary colors be called artistic. The texture in galaxy has to the most basic texture in any game this Gen. What game has worst texture then this game? OTHER WII GAMES!!! I much rather look at HL2, any sport game. Even RC has better art direction.

I won't deny that Mario Galaxy is a great for some of you. But don't let those fanboy goggles blind you. Mario has WII great graphics that is!

Sparticus247

But SMG won Best Graphics- Artisitic , out of any game this year...

Dont forget it also won Game of the Year...

Are GS editors a bunch of fanboys too..

Like i said artistic is subjective.Im arguing the point where the TC says that Mario Galaxy have great graphics is doesn't.

I guess that's subjective too?

It can be when comparing games like GeoW to Uncharted or COD4 or AC but not Mario galaxy to any game on 360 ps3 on the PC. Wii just doesn't have and capability to do anything remotely closesays to Halo 3, or Rachet and Clank.

[QUOTE="fitzokoli"][QUOTE="efd753"]

Mario galaxy has great gameplay. But the graphics are crap to compare to 360 0s3 and pc. There is no denying this. You can't actually believe that Mario has graphics that rival any of the 360 ps3 and pc games this gen. You just can't believe. I don't care so much of a fanboy you are, you can't deny the wii is the worst console for graphics. The hardware is not on the level of the 360 ps3 and pc. If the wii hardware is inferior to the rest of the consoleshow can any game on the wii have great graphics? Mario galaxy is the best looking game on the wii that is it. Is not the best looking game anywhere else.

You may say that the art is great but that subjective. I don't understand how a game that uses primary colors be called artistic. The texture in galaxy has to the most basic texture in any game this Gen. What game has worst texture then this game? OTHER WII GAMES!!! I much rather look at HL2, any sport game. Even RC has better art direction.

I won't deny that Mario Galaxy is a great for some of you. But don't let those fanboy goggles blind you. Mario has WII great graphics that is!

efd753

But SMG won Best Graphics- Artisitic , out of any game this year...

Dont forget it also won Game of the Year...

Are GS editors a bunch of fanboys too..

Like i said artistic is subjective.Im arguing the point where the TC says that Mario Galaxy have great graphics is doesn't.

Thats what i was trying to point out, you said it was subjective but argue like everybody else is wrong about the graphics and only fanboys think its great..I was pointing out that even Gamespot editors think its the game with the best art this year on ANY console even 360 and PS3...

Its subjective yes, but you seem like the only one on the other side of the fence..

I think in argument 3 you should mention how you use the wiimote to control the manta ray, how you blow the bubbles, how you control mario when your on the rolling ball with the star in the middle, and how you use it to blow the snow in one of the galaxy's.

but yeah great thread!

[QUOTE="Sparticus247"][QUOTE="efd753"][QUOTE="fitzokoli"][QUOTE="efd753"]

Mario galaxy has great gameplay. But the graphics are crap to compare to 360 0s3 and pc. There is no denying this. You can't actually believe that Mario has graphics that rival any of the 360 ps3 and pc games this gen. You just can't believe. I don't care so much of a fanboy you are, you can't deny the wii is the worst console for graphics. The hardware is not on the level of the 360 ps3 and pc. If the wii hardware is inferior to the rest of the consoleshow can any game on the wii have great graphics? Mario galaxy is the best looking game on the wii that is it. Is not the best looking game anywhere else.

You may say that the art is great but that subjective. I don't understand how a game that uses primary colors be called artistic. The texture in galaxy has to the most basic texture in any game this Gen. What game has worst texture then this game? OTHER WII GAMES!!! I much rather look at HL2, any sport game. Even RC has better art direction.

I won't deny that Mario Galaxy is a great for some of you. But don't let those fanboy goggles blind you. Mario has WII great graphics that is!

efd753

But SMG won Best Graphics- Artisitic , out of any game this year...

Dont forget it also won Game of the Year...

Are GS editors a bunch of fanboys too..

Like i said artistic is subjective.Im arguing the point where the TC says that Mario Galaxy have great graphics is doesn't.

I guess that's subjective too?

It can be when comparing games like GeoW to Uncharted or COD4 or AC but not Mario galaxy to any game on 360 ps3 on the PC. Wii just doesn't have and capability to do anything remotely closesays to Halo 3, or Rachet and Clank.

I think in argument 3 you should mention how you use the wiimote to control the manta ray, how you blow the bubbles, how you control mario when your on the rolling ball with the star in the middle, and how you use it to blow the snow in one of the galaxy's.

but yeah great thread!

Silenthps

Thats what i was trying to point out, you said it was subjective but argue like everybody else is wrong about the graphics and only fanboys think its great..I was pointing out that even Gamespot editors think its the game with the best art on ANY console even 360 and PS3...

Its subjective yes, but you seem like the only one on the other side of the fence..

fitzokoli

Gamespot said that Mario Galaxy have the best Artistic Graphic. That what they said. If you see the onther graphic award u would see that crysis won that. Now back to my argument Artistic Graphic is subjective much like any art form is. I dont understand how a game that uses primary colors as texture wins the artistic award. But it did. Now in terms of graphics-tech wise Mario Galaxy sucks plain and simple. whena consolebest graphics come from a game that doesnt even beat some of last gen Graphics then there is problem. The TC said mario had great graphics, what he shoudl of said is that is has great artistic graphics. Becuase on the tech side It pales in comparision of the 360 ps3 and pc. That my arguement.

[QUOTE="fitzokoli"]

Thats what i was trying to point out, you said it was subjective but argue like everybody else is wrong about the graphics and only fanboys think its great..I was pointing out that even Gamespot editors think its the game with the best art on ANY console even 360 and PS3...

Its subjective yes, but you seem like the only one on the other side of the fence..

efd753

Gamespot said that Mario Galaxy have the best Artistic Graphic. That what they said. If you see the onther graphic award u would see that crysis won that. Now back to my argument Artistic Graphic is subjective much like any art form is. I dont understand how a game that uses primary colors as texture wins the artistic award. But it did. Now in terms of graphics-tech wise Mario Galaxy sucks plain and simple. whena consolebest graphics come from a game that doesnt even beat some of last gen Graphics then there is problem. The TC said mario had great graphics, what he shoudl of said is that is has great artistic graphics. Becuase on the tech side It pales in comparision of the 360 ps3 and pc. That my arguement.

The forced WiI mote controls in this game are the worst part of it.

Please tell me why I have to use the Wii mote to steer in the ray surfing or ball rolling when I have a freaking nun-chuck attached to the Wii mote that I can use to steer. At least give people the option to use it to steer if they want to.

The forced Wii Mote condoles doesn't add anything special to this game except annoyance.

The strength in this game is the level design. Thats something that can be appreciated with any good controller.

But not if they force you to use a control scheme that you hate just for the sake of "progress"

SMG would have been the exact same game when played with a regular controller. I don't see why people are fooled into thinking the Wii mote adds anything special to the game.

The forced WiI mote controls in this game are the worst part of it.

Please tell me why I have to use the Wii mote to steer in the ray surfing or ball rolling when I have a freaking nun-chuck attached to the Wii mote that I can use to steer. At least give people the option to use it to steer if they want to.

The forced Wii Mote condoles doesn't add anything special to this game except annoyance.

The strength in this game is the level design. Thats something that can be appreciated with any controller.

But not if they force you to use a control scheme that you hate just for the sake of "progress"

SMG would have been the exact same game when played with a regular controller. I don't see why people are fooled into thinking the Wii mote adds anything special to the game.

Gaara79

You don't like the motion controls?

I wished they were more of them, considering they were so well made.

The best part was rolling the ball. That was genious.

SMG would not have been the exact same game with a regular controller.

It would have to be changed dramatically.

[QUOTE="Gaara79"]

The forced WiI mote controls in this game are the worst part of it.

Please tell me why I have to use the Wii mote to steer in the ray surfing or ball rolling when I have a freaking nun-chuck attached to the Wii mote that I can use to steer. At least give people the option to use it to steer if they want to.

The forced Wii Mote condoles doesn't add anything special to this game except annoyance.

The strength in this game is the level design. Thats something that can be appreciated with any controller.

But not if they force you to use a control scheme that you hate just for the sake of "progress"

SMG would have been the exact same game when played with a regular controller. I don't see why people are fooled into thinking the Wii mote adds anything special to the game.

Willy105

You don't like the motion controls?

I wished they were more of them, considering they were so well made.

The best part was rolling the ball. That was genious.

SMG would not have been the exact same game with a regular controller.

It would have to be changed dramatically.

Great times, really.

[QUOTE="efd753"][QUOTE="fitzokoli"]

Thats what i was trying to point out, you said it was subjective but argue like everybody else is wrong about the graphics and only fanboys think its great..I was pointing out that even Gamespot editors think its the game with the best art on ANY console even 360 and PS3...

Its subjective yes, but you seem like the only one on the other side of the fence..

legend26

Gamespot said that Mario Galaxy have the best Artistic Graphic. That what they said. If you see the onther graphic award u would see that crysis won that. Now back to my argument Artistic Graphic is subjective much like any art form is. I dont understand how a game that uses primary colors as texture wins the artistic award. But it did. Now in terms of graphics-tech wise Mario Galaxy sucks plain and simple. whena consolebest graphics come from a game that doesnt even beat some of last gen Graphics then there is problem. The TC said mario had great graphics, what he shoudl of said is that is has great artistic graphics. Becuase on the tech side It pales in comparision of the 360 ps3 and pc. That my arguement.

Primary colors is the base of all arts. That your arguement? You kidding mehow u do translate that to any other art let say audio or film. Let me paint a painting with only primary colors and no mixing. LEt use red, blue, green, maybe yellow and black and white. Now how artistic is that? Your answer should is subjective, but it petty dam simple dont you think? See the thing is that mario galaxy art is not new. We seen it before in every single mario game!!!

Now to your other question I started gaming on my NES. Guess which game is my fav game of all time. Super MArio Bros 3 now that game just great. I could never get into 3d mario.

[QUOTE="Gaara79"]

The forced WiI mote controls in this game are the worst part of it.

Please tell me why I have to use the Wii mote to steer in the ray surfing or ball rolling when I have a freaking nun-chuck attached to the Wii mote that I can use to steer. At least give people the option to use it to steer if they want to.

The forced Wii Mote condoles doesn't add anything special to this game except annoyance.

The strength in this game is the level design. Thats something that can be appreciated with any controller.

But not if they force you to use a control scheme that you hate just for the sake of "progress"

SMG would have been the exact same game when played with a regular controller. I don't see why people are fooled into thinking the Wii mote adds anything special to the game.

Willy105

You don't like the motion controls?

I wished they were more of them, considering they were so well made.

The best part was rolling the ball. That was genious.

SMG would not have been the exact same game with a regular controller.

It would have to be changed dramatically.

i actually found some of the remote control use quite frustrating (ive done manta ray and rolling ball). the manta ray was fun, and that level would be absolute crap on a regular controller, but i just found the rolling to be frustrating. they need more of them to make it fun, when you're only learning them for one level, it makes it kinda boring.

BUT! the shaking is great, i'd much rather do that than press a button, however, the pointer sometimes goes outa whack when im shaking it to get as much star bits as i can... but i still cant imagine mario galaxy without it. It'd be just back to collecting coins, again :(

You know, everyone says how great this game is (including my wife), but I just don't see it. Sure, it's bright and colorful and there's a lot going on and crazy camera stuff going around the levels, but what's so revolutionary about it? I don't see how it won GOTY - personally, I'd give it to Rock Band; Harmonix really made something that's greater than the sum of its parts, with the cooperative overdrive, saving failing band members, and so on. Even Metroid Prime 3 was a better Wii game, showing off how you could use the Wiimote for something that hadn't been done on a console before.lowe0

I think the rehash arguement is the dumbest arguement. But luckily, it isn't used very often.

Fanboys actually seem to respect SMG for the most part.

[QUOTE="lowe0"]You know, everyone says how great this game is (including my wife), but I just don't see it. Sure, it's bright and colorful and there's a lot going on and crazy camera stuff going around the levels, but what's so revolutionary about it? I don't see how it won GOTY - personally, I'd give it to Rock Band; Harmonix really made something that's greater than the sum of its parts, with the cooperative overdrive, saving failing band members, and so on. Even Metroid Prime 3 was a better Wii game, showing off how you could use the Wiimote for something that hadn't been done on a console before.beast667

ya or else thered be like 4 great games a year. that would suck. and im pretty sure mario galaxy is more revolutionary than MP3 except for maybe ther fact that MP3 controls were good.

I agree except 3, the only thing that makes the Wiimote good for SMG is collecting star bits, and somewhat 5, I found the story lame, though I want to know what happened to "The girl" after she became homesick.

[QUOTE="legend26"][QUOTE="efd753"][QUOTE="fitzokoli"]

Thats what i was trying to point out, you said it was subjective but argue like everybody else is wrong about the graphics and only fanboys think its great..I was pointing out that even Gamespot editors think its the game with the best art on ANY console even 360 and PS3...

Its subjective yes, but you seem like the only one on the other side of the fence..

efd753

Gamespot said that Mario Galaxy have the best Artistic Graphic. That what they said. If you see the onther graphic award u would see that crysis won that. Now back to my argument Artistic Graphic is subjective much like any art form is. I dont understand how a game that uses primary colors as texture wins the artistic award. But it did. Now in terms of graphics-tech wise Mario Galaxy sucks plain and simple. whena consolebest graphics come from a game that doesnt even beat some of last gen Graphics then there is problem. The TC said mario had great graphics, what he shoudl of said is that is has great artistic graphics. Becuase on the tech side It pales in comparision of the 360 ps3 and pc. That my arguement.

Primary colors is the base of all arts. That your arguement? You kidding mehow u do translate that to any other art let say audio or film. Let me paint a painting with only primary colors and no mixing. LEt use red, blue, green, maybe yellow and black and white. Now how artistic is that? Your answer should is subjective, but it petty dam simple dont you think? See the thing is that mario galaxy art is not new. We seen it before in every single mario game!!!

Now to your other question I started gaming on my NES. Guess which game is my fav game of all time. Super MArio Bros 3 now that game just great. I could never get into 3d mario.

ok i was wrong about what generation u started.

[QUOTE="fitzokoli"]

Thats what i was trying to point out, you said it was subjective but argue like everybody else is wrong about the graphics and only fanboys think its great..I was pointing out that even Gamespot editors think its the game with the best art on ANY console even 360 and PS3...

Its subjective yes, but you seem like the only one on the other side of the fence..

efd753

Gamespot said that Mario Galaxy have the best Artistic Graphic. That what they said. If you see the onther graphic award u would see that crysis won that. Now back to my argument Artistic Graphic is subjective much like any art form is. I dont understand how a game that uses primary colors as texture wins the artistic award. But it did. Now in terms of graphics-tech wise Mario Galaxy sucks plain and simple. whena consolebest graphics come from a game that doesnt even beat some of last gen Graphics then there is problem. The TC said mario had great graphics, what he shoudl of said is that is has great artistic graphics. Becuase on the tech side It pales in comparision of the 360 ps3 and pc. That my arguement.

SMG is a good looking game ,plain and simple..Artistically and technically...Have you even played it?? Its the best game artistically speaking this year according to gs...Its a great looking game technically,sure it doesnt look as good as 360 games but that doesnt take away the fact that its a good looking game...Its the best looking game on the Wii right now please keep in mind its not in the gray black and brown category like GeoW...So comparing it to those kinda games is stupid...You say it doesnt beat some games of last gen what games are u comparing it to...Re4 alone on GC was one of the best looking games last gen...We havent seen the best of the best when it comes to gray black and brown for the Wii and we can expect stuff better than RE4...We have to wait to compare..

You seem to be mixing things up..Is your argument 1.Super Mario Galaxy has bad graphics or 2.Super Mario Galaxy's graphics are good butdont compare to 360 graphics...

If its the latter i can kinda agree to some extent, if its the former sorry but i flat out disagree...

Fact: SMG is all you kiddies will ever get and so will hang onto for the next decade. Yeah i know, PS2 sucked, it only had no exclusive GOTYs!:lol:

Wii fankids = OWNED

Now go play your sales:lol:

WuTangG

you=owned

[QUOTE="WuTangG"]

Fact: SMG is all you kiddies will ever get and so will hang onto for the next decade. Yeah i know, PS2 sucked, it only had no exclusive GOTYs!:lol:

Wii fankids = OWNED

Now go play your sales:lol:

legend26

you=owned

SMG = Amazing Game

Where did i deny that:| Oh wait, its just you Kidtendo fankids are seeing something not so godly about your precious N who like to shaft you over with one cash in after another

Enjoy your sales, now eat up Mario 'SPECIAL RACE' Olympics:lol:

[QUOTE="WuTangG"]

Fact: SMG is all you kiddies will ever get and so will hang onto for the next decade. Yeah i know, PS2 sucked, it only had no exclusive GOTYs!:lol:

Wii fankids = OWNED

Now go play your sales:lol:

legend26

you=owned

[QUOTE="legend26"][QUOTE="WuTangG"]

Fact: SMG is all you kiddies will ever get and so will hang onto for the next decade. Yeah i know, PS2 sucked, it only had no exclusive GOTYs!:lol:

Wii fankids = OWNED

Now go play your sales:lol:

Nintendo_Ownes7

you=owned