Misconceptions against Super Mario Galaxy

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"]

No results? In twenty years of gaming, I've never seen a single video game console make it to mainstream, international coverage from every media outlet. Sorry, but you must be blind if you can't see the movements under the surface at work already.

And console style games ARE casual. Sorry if you're so brainwashed by MS/Sony's flashy advertising and MTV promos (LOL), but console games have been casual since the PS1/N64 generation when games stopped being about IF you beat a game, and started being about WHEN you beat a game. Just play Rainbow Six Vegas and GRAW and tell me those are not casual. Or Gears and Halo 3.

WuTangG

LOL, only a CASUAL would say that GRAW and R6V are the best in the series. They might as well be on-rails arcade shooters compared to the TRUE originals. In-depth mission planning, fully customizable load-outs, permanently lost teammates if you got them killed on a mission, fully open ended levels, one-shot-kills.

No true PC gamer would ever say that the series has improved, especially not with R6V. It's lost so much depth that they shouldn't even call it Rainbow Six anymore.

[QUOTE="RK-Mara"]

Can't anyone ban this guy already? I hate him more than Jack Thompson.

WuTangG

[QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]

The only hardcore games nowadays are PC games (on the traditional side) and Wii games (on the new side). The Xbox 360 and PS3 have done more to destroy gaming than the Wii has. The Wii is simply embracing the inevitable new status quo and doing what consoles should have been doing for the last decade and a half: separating itself from the PC and growing into its own industry, rather than sinking its fangs into PC gaming and dragging everybody down like what the PS3 and 360 are doing.

mjarantilla

Kidtendo, well i like your outlook, but just like every other Kidtendo fankid, its all delusion, sorry mate, no proof, only proof AGAINST you. Oh well i have a gaming PC, but i take a while to upgrade, i like having a $300 machine filling in the gaps, you sheepkids just want to destroy everything dont you:lol:

Fighters, racers, and sports games can stay on consoles. Those are casual games, through and through. JRPGs have been on PCs, but they are simply outclassed by PC WRPGs. Or rather, they used to be outclassed, until Morrowind and Oblivion (both Xbox/360 games, too, not coincidentally) took the standard for PC WRPGs and sent it into the trash heap.

And console gaming SHOULD be destroyed so that it can be rebuilt, brand new with a proper style and structure of its own rather than the half-breed hodge-podge it currently is that borrows the worst from casualized PC games, outdated Hollywood action movies, and MTV music video rejects. The Wii and DS will rebuild gaming the way it SHOULD have been, before the PlayStation and, especially, the Xbox hijacked it and filled it with worthless marketing and advertising.

WiiSports is the PONG of the new generation.

Fighters, racers and sports games are casual games? You sicken me seriously never put down a genre no matter how much you dislike it, saying what you said suggest that there is little skill involved in all the games that come under those genres. I cant speak for sports games but the skill involved in racers and fighters justify it not to be casual (the fact you call them casual somewhat refelects your skill in those genres) also is it just possible that some genres work better on consoles such as fighting and racing which I imagine is why your putting them down as for the wii yeah its own market definetly but I see some irony here. From some console gamers perspective the wii is destroying gaming while some pc gamers think consoles full stop are destroying gaming, I see the only reason you improve of the wii is because it does not encroach on what you percieve to be pc gaming teritory :P But whatever next big game industry changing thing that comes after the wii is, all the wii gamers will be saying that thats destroying gaming I reckon :P

[QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="RK-Mara"]

Can't anyone ban this guy already? I hate him more than Jack Thompson.

legend26

Remember, Mario Partys and Wii Fits are the bestest games!

[QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="RK-Mara"]

Can't anyone ban this guy already? I hate him more than Jack Thompson.

legend26

[QUOTE="legend26"][QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="RK-Mara"]

Can't anyone ban this guy already? I hate him more than Jack Thompson.

WuTangG

Remember, Mario Partys and Wii Fits are the bestest games!

[QUOTE="legend26"][QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="RK-Mara"]

Can't anyone ban this guy already? I hate him more than Jack Thompson.

Denjin_hadouken

Oh well, Fankids will always be fankids:lol:

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]

No results? In twenty years of gaming, I've never seen a single video game console make it to mainstream, international coverage from every media outlet. Sorry, but you must be blind if you can't see the movements under the surface at work already.

And console style games ARE casual. Sorry if you're so brainwashed by MS/Sony's flashy advertising and MTV promos (LOL), but console games have been casual since the PS1/N64 generation when games stopped being about IF you beat a game, and started being about WHEN you beat a game. Just play Rainbow Six Vegas and GRAW and tell me those are not casual. Or Gears and Halo 3.

WuTangG

LOL, only a CASUAL would say that GRAW and R6V are the best in the series. They might as well be on-rails arcade shooters compared to the TRUE originals. In-depth mission planning, fully customizable load-outs, permanently lost teammates if you got them killed on a mission, fully open ended levels, one-shot-kills.

No true PC gamer would ever say that the series has improved, especially not with R6V. It's lost so much that they shouldn't even call it Rainbow Six anymore.

On the other hand, your might Kidtendo doesnt have good games OR hardcore games, what a shame (waits for random SMG comment):lol:

They're more fun for CASUALS. Which is my point. Consoles should separate themselves from PCs, which the Wii has done.

And the Wii has more hardcore games than the 360 or PS3. Again, sorry if you've been brainwashed into thinking otherwise, but the only games to ever get the "Punishing Difficulty" emblem on their review are on the Wii. And out of all three current-gen consoles, the Wii has the most good games that last over 20 hours. 360/PS3 games are pathetically easy by comparison. The developers stroke your ego so much in 360/PS3 games like R6Vegas and GRAW that they might as well be giving you a handjob. That's the only reason anyone thinks those games are "fun."

[QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]

No results? In twenty years of gaming, I've never seen a single video game console make it to mainstream, international coverage from every media outlet. Sorry, but you must be blind if you can't see the movements under the surface at work already.

And console style games ARE casual. Sorry if you're so brainwashed by MS/Sony's flashy advertising and MTV promos (LOL), but console games have been casual since the PS1/N64 generation when games stopped being about IF you beat a game, and started being about WHEN you beat a game. Just play Rainbow Six Vegas and GRAW and tell me those are not casual. Or Gears and Halo 3.

mjarantilla

LOL, only a CASUAL would say that GRAW and R6V are the best in the series. They might as well be on-rails arcade shooters compared to the TRUE originals. In-depth mission planning, fully customizable load-outs, permanently lost teammates if you got them killed on a mission, fully open ended levels, one-shot-kills.

No true PC gamer would ever say that the series has improved, especially not with R6V. It's lost so much that they shouldn't even call it Rainbow Six anymore.

On the other hand, your might Kidtendo doesnt have good games OR hardcore games, what a shame (waits for random SMG comment):lol:

They're more fun for CASUALS. Which is my point. Consoles should separate themselves from PCs, which the Wii has done.

And the Wii has more hardcore games than the 360 or PS3. Again, sorry if you've been brainwashed into thinking otherwise, but the only games to ever get the "Punishing Difficulty" emblem on their review are on the Wii. And out of all three current-gen consoles, the Wii has the most good games that last over 20 hours. 360/PS3 games are pathetically easy by comparison. The developers stroke your ego so much in 360/PS3 games like R6Vegas and GRAW that they might as well be giving you a handjob. That's the only reason anyone thinks those games are "fun."

Go check the review scores, oh wait, you Sheepkids just say 'teh opinion' and ignore them. Oh well, a grandma is just as qualified as Greg K, so youre right:lol:

[QUOTE="Denjin_hadouken"][QUOTE="legend26"][QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="RK-Mara"]

Can't anyone ban this guy already? I hate him more than Jack Thompson.

WuTangG

Oh well, Fankids will always be fankids:lol:

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]

The only hardcore games nowadays are PC games (on the traditional side) and Wii games (on the new side). The Xbox 360 and PS3 have done more to destroy gaming than the Wii has. The Wii is simply embracing the inevitable new status quo and doing what consoles should have been doing for the last decade and a half: separating itself from the PC and growing into its own industry, rather than sinking its fangs into PC gaming and dragging everybody down like what the PS3 and 360 are doing.

proud722

Kidtendo, well i like your outlook, but just like every other Kidtendo fankid, its all delusion, sorry mate, no proof, only proof AGAINST you. Oh well i have a gaming PC, but i take a while to upgrade, i like having a $300 machine filling in the gaps, you sheepkids just want to destroy everything dont you:lol:

Fighters, racers, and sports games can stay on consoles. Those are casual games, through and through. JRPGs have been on PCs, but they are simply outclassed by PC WRPGs. Or rather, they used to be outclassed, until Morrowind and Oblivion (both Xbox/360 games, too, not coincidentally) took the standard for PC WRPGs and sent it into the trash heap.

And console gaming SHOULD be destroyed so that it can be rebuilt, brand new with a proper style and structure of its own rather than the half-breed hodge-podge it currently is that borrows the worst from casualized PC games, outdated Hollywood action movies, and MTV music video rejects. The Wii and DS will rebuild gaming the way it SHOULD have been, before the PlayStation and, especially, the Xbox hijacked it and filled it with worthless marketing and advertising.

WiiSports is the PONG of the new generation.

Fighters, racers and sports games are casual games? You sicken me seriously never put down a genre no matter how much you dislike it, saying what you said suggest that there is little skill involved in all the games that come under those genres. I cant speak for sports games but the skill involved in racers and fighters justify it not to be casual (the fact you call them casual somewhat refelects your skill in those genres) also is it just possible that some genres work better on consoles such as fighting and racing which I imagine is why your putting them down as for the wii yeah its own market definetly but I see some irony here. From some console gamers perspective the wii is destroying gaming while some pc gamers think consoles full stop are destroying gaming, I see the only reason you improve of the wii is because it does not encroach on what you percieve to be pc gaming teritory :P But whatever next big game industry changing thing that comes after the wii is, all the wii gamers will be saying that thats destroying gaming I reckon :P

You can be a hardcore fighting game player and a hardcore racing game player, but that doesn't make you a hardcore gamer. My old roommate played nothing but sports games, to the point where I had to drag him away from his Dreamcast to go to class. But he definitely doesn't consider himself a hardcore gamer. That's my point. These genres develop their own audiences that frequently do not care about any other type of game, even more so than other genres like shooters and action-adventure games.

They're more fun for CASUALS. Which is my point. Consoles should separate themselves from PCs, which the Wii has done.

And the Wii has more hardcore games than the 360 or PS3. Again, sorry if you've been brainwashed into thinking otherwise, but the only games to ever get the "Punishing Difficulty" emblem on their review are on the Wii. And out of all three current-gen consoles, the Wii has the most good games that last over 20 hours. 360/PS3 games are pathetically easy by comparison. The developers stroke your ego so much in 360/PS3 games like R6Vegas and GRAW that they might as well be giving you a handjob. That's the only reason anyone thinks those games are "fun."

mjarantilla

Fire Emblem truely is a game for the hardcore and I don't know about TC:New Blood, but it's a hard game as well harder than those shoooters R6V and GRAW.

WuTang

Get out of here.

I don't want kids on my threads.

[QUOTE="proud722"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]

The only hardcore games nowadays are PC games (on the traditional side) and Wii games (on the new side). The Xbox 360 and PS3 have done more to destroy gaming than the Wii has. The Wii is simply embracing the inevitable new status quo and doing what consoles should have been doing for the last decade and a half: separating itself from the PC and growing into its own industry, rather than sinking its fangs into PC gaming and dragging everybody down like what the PS3 and 360 are doing.

mjarantilla

Kidtendo, well i like your outlook, but just like every other Kidtendo fankid, its all delusion, sorry mate, no proof, only proof AGAINST you. Oh well i have a gaming PC, but i take a while to upgrade, i like having a $300 machine filling in the gaps, you sheepkids just want to destroy everything dont you:lol:

Fighters, racers, and sports games can stay on consoles. Those are casual games, through and through. JRPGs have been on PCs, but they are simply outclassed by PC WRPGs. Or rather, they used to be outclassed, until Morrowind and Oblivion (both Xbox/360 games, too, not coincidentally) took the standard for PC WRPGs and sent it into the trash heap.

And console gaming SHOULD be destroyed so that it can be rebuilt, brand new with a proper style and structure of its own rather than the half-breed hodge-podge it currently is that borrows the worst from casualized PC games, outdated Hollywood action movies, and MTV music video rejects. The Wii and DS will rebuild gaming the way it SHOULD have been, before the PlayStation and, especially, the Xbox hijacked it and filled it with worthless marketing and advertising.

WiiSports is the PONG of the new generation.

Fighters, racers and sports games are casual games? You sicken me seriously never put down a genre no matter how much you dislike it, saying what you said suggest that there is little skill involved in all the games that come under those genres. I cant speak for sports games but the skill involved in racers and fighters justify it not to be casual (the fact you call them casual somewhat refelects your skill in those genres) also is it just possible that some genres work better on consoles such as fighting and racing which I imagine is why your putting them down as for the wii yeah its own market definetly but I see some irony here. From some console gamers perspective the wii is destroying gaming while some pc gamers think consoles full stop are destroying gaming, I see the only reason you improve of the wii is because it does not encroach on what you percieve to be pc gaming teritory :P But whatever next big game industry changing thing that comes after the wii is, all the wii gamers will be saying that thats destroying gaming I reckon :P

You can be a hardcore fighting game player and a hardcore racing game player, but that doesn't make you a hardcore gamer. My old roommate played nothing but sports games, to the point where I had to drag him away from his Dreamcast to go to class. But he definitely doesn't consider himself a hardcore gamer. That's my point. These genres develop their own audiences that frequently do not care about any other type of game, even more so than other genres like shooters and action-adventure games.

Fair enough man as long as your not saying the genres have little skill involved in them. Im off the personal belief that you can play as much video games as you want and you can even be really skilled but there is always other criteria to fill before I personally would exept that person as a hardcore gamer though it tends to be that everyones criteria is different but theres usually some things in peoples criteria that are always the same.

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"]

They're more fun for CASUALS. Which is my point. Consoles should separate themselves from PCs, which the Wii has done.

And the Wii has more hardcore games than the 360 or PS3. Again, sorry if you've been brainwashed into thinking otherwise, but the only games to ever get the "Punishing Difficulty" emblem on their review are on the Wii. And out of all three current-gen consoles, the Wii has the most good games that last over 20 hours. 360/PS3 games are pathetically easy by comparison. The developers stroke your ego so much in 360/PS3 games like R6Vegas and GRAW that they might as well be giving you a handjob. That's the only reason anyone thinks those games are "fun."

FireEmblem_Man

Fire Emblem truely is a game for the hardcore and I don't know about TC:New Blood, but it's a hard game as well harder than those shoooters R6V and GRAW.

In that case man SMG is most definetly not hardcore, as platformers go its dam easy for the most part.

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="WuTangG"]

Youre right, the games are less hardcore, but they are more fun, END OF STORY

On the other hand, your might Kidtendo doesnt have good games OR hardcore games, what a shame (waits for random SMG comment):lol:

WuTangG

They're more fun for CASUALS. Which is my point. Consoles should separate themselves from PCs, which the Wii has done.

And the Wii has more hardcore games than the 360 or PS3. Again, sorry if you've been brainwashed into thinking otherwise, but the only games to ever get the "Punishing Difficulty" emblem on their review are on the Wii. And out of all three current-gen consoles, the Wii has the most good games that last over 20 hours. 360/PS3 games are pathetically easy by comparison. The developers stroke your ego so much in 360/PS3 games like R6Vegas and GRAW that they might as well be giving you a handjob. That's the only reason anyone thinks those games are "fun."

Go check the review scores, oh wait, you Sheepkids just say 'teh opinion' and ignore them. Oh well, a grandma is just as qualified as Greg K, so youre right:lol:

Of course they're more "fun" for you: they made them simpler so that people like you could actually play them! They took out everything that required any kind of thought or effort on the part of the player, and made it so that you couldn't even die unless you stood out in the open for ten seconds!

As for review scores, standards have fallen over the last ten years. The original Rainbow Six (8.0) was released the same year as Ocarina of Time (10.0), Grim Fandango (9.3), Baldur's Gate (9.2), StarCraft (9.1), and a host of other amazing games. It's no wonder it got a comparatively low score, once you look at the scores they used to give out back then.

Hell, according to review scores, Rainbow Six Vegas is equal to StarCraft. To that, I say, HAH!

[QUOTE="FireEmblem_Man"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]

They're more fun for CASUALS. Which is my point. Consoles should separate themselves from PCs, which the Wii has done.

And the Wii has more hardcore games than the 360 or PS3. Again, sorry if you've been brainwashed into thinking otherwise, but the only games to ever get the "Punishing Difficulty" emblem on their review are on the Wii. And out of all three current-gen consoles, the Wii has the most good games that last over 20 hours. 360/PS3 games are pathetically easy by comparison. The developers stroke your ego so much in 360/PS3 games like R6Vegas and GRAW that they might as well be giving you a handjob. That's the only reason anyone thinks those games are "fun."

proud722

Fire Emblem truely is a game for the hardcore and I don't know about TC:New Blood, but it's a hard game as well harder than those shoooters R6V and GRAW.

In that case man SMG is most definetly not hardcore, as platformers go its dam easy for the most part.

But still too hard for the casual gamer.

It's like "hardcore beginner"

How did I miss this thread (dam offtopic) well for all your myths I offer you a genuine reason which Im sure you have heard been made by now but still for those of you who haven't heard: As platformers go SMG is overly easy and that is why I would suggest to anyone who is reasonably experienced in platformers not to bother, seriously I just did'nt feel I got my moneys worth due to the lack of challenge I mean sure its fun and everything but things get boring when they stay too easy for too long. I see how its a great game for its audience but personally the lack of difficulty just ruined it for me.
proud722

If you think SMG is too easy than you haven't gotten 120 stars. One of the stars in particular took me almost an hour to get. Some of the other stars took many, many tries to get. And I'm an experienced gamer who found SM64 to be a breeze.

[QUOTE="proud722"][QUOTE="FireEmblem_Man"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]

They're more fun for CASUALS. Which is my point. Consoles should separate themselves from PCs, which the Wii has done.

And the Wii has more hardcore games than the 360 or PS3. Again, sorry if you've been brainwashed into thinking otherwise, but the only games to ever get the "Punishing Difficulty" emblem on their review are on the Wii. And out of all three current-gen consoles, the Wii has the most good games that last over 20 hours. 360/PS3 games are pathetically easy by comparison. The developers stroke your ego so much in 360/PS3 games like R6Vegas and GRAW that they might as well be giving you a handjob. That's the only reason anyone thinks those games are "fun."

Willy105

Fire Emblem truely is a game for the hardcore and I don't know about TC:New Blood, but it's a hard game as well harder than those shoooters R6V and GRAW.

In that case man SMG is most definetly not hardcore, as platformers go its dam easy for the most part.

But still too hard for the casual gamer.

It's like "hardcore beginner"

Fair enough 100% it to a casual gamer would seem like an impossible accomplishment. See what I think nintendo are doing is maybe there plan is to kind of ease in the casual gamers then as the games get more difficult alot more people become hardcore and then gaming finally gets the recognition it deserves as a major media because ultimately that would make nintendo more money then just throwing there hardcore fans to the side right? Also then once again they would hold the nostalgia merit they've had with previouse generations for another generation but with even more people. So what do you think or is that just too good of a business plan for them to come up with? :P

[QUOTE="Willy105"][QUOTE="proud722"][QUOTE="FireEmblem_Man"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]

They're more fun for CASUALS. Which is my point. Consoles should separate themselves from PCs, which the Wii has done.

And the Wii has more hardcore games than the 360 or PS3. Again, sorry if you've been brainwashed into thinking otherwise, but the only games to ever get the "Punishing Difficulty" emblem on their review are on the Wii. And out of all three current-gen consoles, the Wii has the most good games that last over 20 hours. 360/PS3 games are pathetically easy by comparison. The developers stroke your ego so much in 360/PS3 games like R6Vegas and GRAW that they might as well be giving you a handjob. That's the only reason anyone thinks those games are "fun."

proud722

Fire Emblem truely is a game for the hardcore and I don't know about TC:New Blood, but it's a hard game as well harder than those shoooters R6V and GRAW.

In that case man SMG is most definetly not hardcore, as platformers go its dam easy for the most part.

But still too hard for the casual gamer.

It's like "hardcore beginner"

Fair enough 100% it to a casual gamer would seem like an impossible accomplishment. See what I think nintendo are doing is maybe there plan is to kind of ease in the casual gamers then as the games get more difficult alot more people become hardcore and then gaming finally gets the recognition it deserves as a major media because ultimately that would make nintendo more money then just throwing there hardcore fans to the side right? Also then once again they would hold the nostalgia merit they've had with previouse generations for another generation but with even more people. So what do you think or is that just too good of a business plan for them to come up with? :P

It sounds like they are doing something different, but they are doing the same things they have been doing for the past 100 years...getting people to play games and at the same time making them nostalgic so it will be their games they remember and not their competitors.

[QUOTE="proud722"]How did I miss this thread (dam offtopic) well for all your myths I offer you a genuine reason which Im sure you have heard been made by now but still for those of you who haven't heard: As platformers go SMG is overly easy and that is why I would suggest to anyone who is reasonably experienced in platformers not to bother, seriously I just did'nt feel I got my moneys worth due to the lack of challenge I mean sure its fun and everything but things get boring when they stay too easy for too long. I see how its a great game for its audience but personally the lack of difficulty just ruined it for me.
Number_1_Gamer

If you think SMG is too easy than you haven't gotten 120 stars. One of the stars in particular took me almost an hour to get. Some of the other stars took many, many tries to get. And I'm an experienced gamer who found SM64 to be a breeze.

I got 120 stars man, we can do the wii friend code thing if you want proof (you can take an in game picture of the list of all the stars you have then I could post that to the message board and post that too you right?)

[QUOTE="proud722"][QUOTE="FireEmblem_Man"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]

They're more fun for CASUALS. Which is my point. Consoles should separate themselves from PCs, which the Wii has done.

And the Wii has more hardcore games than the 360 or PS3. Again, sorry if you've been brainwashed into thinking otherwise, but the only games to ever get the "Punishing Difficulty" emblem on their review are on the Wii. And out of all three current-gen consoles, the Wii has the most good games that last over 20 hours. 360/PS3 games are pathetically easy by comparison. The developers stroke your ego so much in 360/PS3 games like R6Vegas and GRAW that they might as well be giving you a handjob. That's the only reason anyone thinks those games are "fun."

Willy105

Fire Emblem truely is a game for the hardcore and I don't know about TC:New Blood, but it's a hard game as well harder than those shoooters R6V and GRAW.

In that case man SMG is most definetly not hardcore, as platformers go its dam easy for the most part.

But still too hard for the casual gamer.

It's like "hardcore beginner"

How about this for size.

Super Mario Galaxy being on par with Super Mario 64.

Yeah you need proof. Look at the poll that I made a few days ago. Your own votes speak for themselves.

Super Mario Galaxy is neck and neck with Super Mario 64. GOTY my keaster. :lol:

How about this for size.

Super Mario Galaxy being on par with Super Mario 64.

Yeah you need proof. Look at the poll that I made a few days ago. Your own votes speak for themselves.

Super Mario Galaxy is neck and neck with Super Mario 64. GOTY my keaster. :lol:

c_smithii

You do realize Super Mario 64 is one of the greatest games ever made and created the absolute standard for all 3D genres? Right?

lemms will be lemms

cows will be cows

sheep will be sheep

and everyone elsewill enjoy mario galaxy for what it is. if you have anything different to say, go talk to Alex Navarro. And pretty much everyone else on gamespot who agreed galaxy is game of the year. if you dont like their choice, why are you on gamespot then?

lemms will be lemms

cows will be cows

sheep will be sheep

and everyone elsewill enjoy mario galaxy for what it is. if you have anything different to say, go talk to Alex Navarro. And pretty much everyone else on gamespot who agreed galaxy is game of the year. if you dont like their choice, why are you on gamespot then?

nintend-man86

Because it's the Best. Forum. Ever.

[QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="RK-Mara"]

Can't anyone ban this guy already? I hate him more than Jack Thompson.

legend26

Just do the internets a favor and stop posting.

[QUOTE="nintend-man86"]

lemms will be lemms

cows will be cows

sheep will be sheep

and everyone elsewill enjoy mario galaxy for what it is. if you have anything different to say, go talk to Alex Navarro. And pretty much everyone else on gamespot who agreed galaxy is game of the year. if you dont like their choice, why are you on gamespot then?

Willy105

Because it's the Best. Forum. Ever.

who are you talkin to? me or the hypothetical people i was reffernceing to hate gamespot's choice?

[QUOTE="Willy105"][QUOTE="nintend-man86"]

lemms will be lemms

cows will be cows

sheep will be sheep

and everyone elsewill enjoy mario galaxy for what it is. if you have anything different to say, go talk to Alex Navarro. And pretty much everyone else on gamespot who agreed galaxy is game of the year. if you dont like their choice, why are you on gamespot then?

nintend-man86

Because it's the Best. Forum. Ever.

who are you talkin to? me or the hypothetical people i was reffernceing to hate gamespot's choice?

We all know why we are here.

This is a great forum.

It has nothing to do with the site the forum is on.

[QUOTE="Denjin_hadouken"][QUOTE="legend26"][QUOTE="WuTangG"][QUOTE="RK-Mara"]

Can't anyone ban this guy already? I hate him more than Jack Thompson.

WuTangG

Oh well, Fankids will always be fankids:lol:

[QUOTE="nintend-man86"][QUOTE="Willy105"][QUOTE="nintend-man86"]

lemms will be lemms

cows will be cows

sheep will be sheep

and everyone elsewill enjoy mario galaxy for what it is. if you have anything different to say, go talk to Alex Navarro. And pretty much everyone else on gamespot who agreed galaxy is game of the year. if you dont like their choice, why are you on gamespot then?

Willy105

Because it's the Best. Forum. Ever.

who are you talkin to? me or the hypothetical people i was reffernceing to hate gamespot's choice?

We all know why we are here.

This is a great forum.

It has nothing to do with the site the forum is on.

i guess. but still, i wish the fanboys would shut up about theGOTY already

Gotta disagree on the graphics part, very jaggie (like Halo 3 amount of jags). Other than that this thread is dead on. (Yes I've played the game).Captain_Waffles

Jaggies?

That's all?

That's like complaining there are ridge lines on an ice cream.

[QUOTE="Captain_Waffles"]Gotta disagree on the graphics part, very jaggie (like Halo 3 amount of jags). Other than that this thread is dead on. (Yes I've played the game).Willy105

Jaggies?

That's all?

That's like complaining there are ridge lines on an ice cream.

I'd say its more like pointing out that there's freezer fuzz on ice cream, yuck!

[QUOTE="Willy105"]

[QUOTE="Captain_Waffles"]Gotta disagree on the graphics part, very jaggie (like Halo 3 amount of jags). Other than that this thread is dead on. (Yes I've played the game).c_smithii

Jaggies?

That's all?

That's like complaining there are ridge lines on an ice cream.

I'd say its more like pointing out that there's freezer fuzz on ice cream, yuck!

It's still nothing.

It doesn't bother me.

Gotta disagree on the graphics part, very jaggie (like Halo 3 amount of jags). Other than that this thread is dead on. (Yes I've played the game).Captain_Waffles

[QUOTE="Captain_Waffles"]Gotta disagree on the graphics part, very jaggie (like Halo 3 amount of jags). Other than that this thread is dead on. (Yes I've played the game).legend26

The game has like 1x AntiAliasing.

[QUOTE="Captain_Waffles"]Gotta disagree on the graphics part, very jaggie (like Halo 3 amount of jags). Other than that this thread is dead on. (Yes I've played the game).legend26

I just wanted to third or fourth that this was a great thread. Another tension in gaming is between Japanese and Western games, and SMG is zen-like where the story is irrelevant. I do like zen-like games, but maybe not everyone does.

The only criticism I relate to is that someone said they'd like to see Miyamoto create a completely original Wii-mote specific masterpiece, but that's not really fair to SMG, and the point kind of failed when they said maybe Wii Fitness would be the game. :)

[QUOTE="WuTangG"]

Fact: SMG is all you kiddies will ever get and so will hang onto for the next decade. Yeah i know, PS2 sucked, it only had no exclusive GOTYs!:lol:

Wii fankids = OWNED

Now go play your sales:lol:

legend26

you=owned

Yeah, doesn;t it feel great knowing that our kids games beat out all the ones for supposedly mature people ;)

No clipping huh?...

1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtctmuDaHrY

2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I15pwSpPYUs

3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81T0BwPwB7s

These are major glitches to me...

Yeah, SMG is a great game. But it has clipping glitches and it does even have some pop up (not very noticeable though obviously).