MS is the best and worst thing to ever happen to the console market.

  • 106 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#51 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
I think I'd rather have them around then not. If you do not like some of their business practices, then don't give in. Don't pull out your wallet.
Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

First payed for map pack was for Halo 2. Followed by MS's policy to force devs to charge for DLC. So MS is the reason we have $15 map packs and have content on discs locked unless you pay for them.

However, I also blame fellow PC gamers for Buying MW2, now we are being charged $60 a game, and if you say it's inflation...............:evil:.

Avatar image for gamermonkey017
gamermonkey017

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#53 gamermonkey017
Member since 2010 • 98 Posts

You have to give Xbox some credit for being the first American console to survive in a long time.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts

No I think the added competition of M$ is a bad thing.kuraimen
MS is a third major console developer. You seem to be contradicting yourself.

Avatar image for Vari3ty
Vari3ty

11111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Vari3ty
Member since 2009 • 11111 Posts

Xbox 360 is better than the PS3

better online experience

more games

more exclusives

better controller

more affordabe

etc etc etc

This is why 360 is beating the PS3. The consumers see the value is greater for Xbox. Plus they don't wanna get hacked and lose their credit card info on psn.

jimmypsn

1. Better online - agree

2. More games - not true

3. More exclusives - lol what?

4. More affordable - maybe in the past, but please explain to me now how a 360 is more affordable than a PS3. If anything the 360 costs more because you have to pay for Live, as well as controllers that don't have built-in batteries.

Avatar image for Adamantium4k2
Adamantium4k2

896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Adamantium4k2
Member since 2009 • 896 Posts

Xbox 360 is better than the PS3

better online experience

more games

more exclusives

better controller

more affordabe

etc etc etc

This is why 360 is beating the PS3. The consumers see the value is greater for Xbox. Plus they don't wanna get hacked and lose their credit card info on psn.

jimmypsn

You just had to ruin a potentially good thread...for shame:evil:

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
Its because Microsoft made online gaming on consoles poular and now mainstream.jimmypsn
That is a complete joke online gaming has been popular before the xbox was even launch on PC,the DC was online before the xbox even launch and online gaming on PS2 was more popular than on the xbox,in fact only 2 million users had xbox live on the original xbox,sony sold like 5 million network adapters,that without saying that the PS2 slim had online play out of the box.
Avatar image for jimmypsn
jimmypsn

4425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 jimmypsn
Member since 2010 • 4425 Posts

[QUOTE="jimmypsn"]Its because Microsoft made online gaming on consoles poular and now mainstream.tormentos
That is a complete joke online gaming has been popular before the xbox was even launch on PC,the DC was online before the xbox even launch and online gaming on PS2 was more popular than on the xbox,in fact only 2 million users had xbox live on the original xbox,sony sold like 5 million network adapters,that without saying that the PS2 slim had online play out of the box.

hahahaah..wow u believe that?

Avatar image for T-Aldous
T-Aldous

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 T-Aldous
Member since 2006 • 1244 Posts

MS is neither the best nor the worst thing in the console market and certainly not both.All three companies have been guilty of nickle and diming their customers, I don't give a crap who you think "introduced" it..

It's amazing how sketchy peoples memories of the last 2 generations are. There is a reason Playstation fanboys were called cows.

heretrix
I agree completely, its amazing how cows suddenly forgot all about the over priced stuff for the PS2 and now say that it was all MS.
Avatar image for roscoedash23
roscoedash23

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 roscoedash23
Member since 2010 • 115 Posts

i'd be fine with just Ninty and Sony like the good old days ... maybe even Apple can get in the mix. I'll never trust MS again after going through 3 consoles in 2 months.

Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts
I love the idea that seems to be commonly held here in SW, that $ony and $intendo aren't out to get our $, just M$. It's laughable.getyeryayasout
damn those crazy Sony and Nintendo fellows charging us 0$ a year to play online ! and how about those free games that PSN Plus offers ? THIEVES I tell you ! gimme a break Sony and Nintendo are so the opposite of nickle and diming.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]You think the added competition of a third major console developer is a bad thing? KC_Hokie

No I think the added competition of M$ is a bad thing.

How? Additional competition in any industry is always good for the consumer.

No it's not always good, it depends on who competes. The way M$ is used to compete is detrimental to the whole industry IMO. I would rather have another less money/power hungry competitor that is not used to use shady tactics to make profits and control the market which M$ is basically the opposite of.
Avatar image for jimmypsn
jimmypsn

4425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 jimmypsn
Member since 2010 • 4425 Posts

[QUOTE="getyeryayasout"]I love the idea that seems to be commonly held here in SW, that $ony and $intendo aren't out to get our $, just M$. It's laughable.rasengan2552
damn those crazy Sony and Nintendo fellows charging us 0$ a year to play online ! and how about those free games that PSN Plus offers ? THIEVES I tell you ! gimme a break Sony and Nintendo are so the opposite of nickle and diming.

Ahh Sony so great just giving us free games out of the blue. Oh wait. PSN was hacked down for a month and people's information and credit cards got stolen.

Avatar image for KevinnButlerNPK
KevinnButlerNPK

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 KevinnButlerNPK
Member since 2010 • 1145 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

MS is neither the best nor the worst thing in the console market and certainly not both.All three companies have been guilty of nickle and diming their customers, I don't give a crap who you think "introduced" it..

It's amazing how sketchy peoples memories of the last 2 generations are. There is a reason Playstation fanboys were called cows.

T-Aldous

I agree completely, its amazing how cows suddenly forgot all about the over priced stuff for the PS2 and now say that it was all MS.

Better yet, remember how every home console included a free game to play, at least 2 controllers and some d games tincluded internal saves, then Sony launched the PS1 with no games, you had to buy extra controllers and memory units for saves? It was ok then...

Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts

[QUOTE="rasengan2552"][QUOTE="getyeryayasout"]I love the idea that seems to be commonly held here in SW, that $ony and $intendo aren't out to get our $, just M$. It's laughable.jimmypsn

damn those crazy Sony and Nintendo fellows charging us 0$ a year to play online ! and how about those free games that PSN Plus offers ? THIEVES I tell you ! gimme a break Sony and Nintendo are so the opposite of nickle and diming.

Ahh Sony so great just giving us free games out of the blue. Oh wait. PSN was hacked down for a month and people's information and credit cards got stolen.

this was sooooo relevant to what I posted.
Avatar image for lDeadlyReconI
lDeadlyReconI

32

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 lDeadlyReconI
Member since 2011 • 32 Posts

You have to give Xbox some credit for being the first American console to survive in a long time.

gamermonkey017
Atari says hi.
Avatar image for KevinnButlerNPK
KevinnButlerNPK

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 KevinnButlerNPK
Member since 2010 • 1145 Posts

[QUOTE="gamermonkey017"]

You have to give Xbox some credit for being the first American console to survive in a long time.

lDeadlyReconI

Atari says hi.

Yeah/ the orginal Atari began in the early 80's died off in 1984 and never really recovered since the crash, I wouldn't exactly call an event 27 years ago as surviving. The Atari now is an old french company called Infograms....

Avatar image for lDeadlyReconI
lDeadlyReconI

32

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 lDeadlyReconI
Member since 2011 • 32 Posts

[QUOTE="lDeadlyReconI"][QUOTE="gamermonkey017"]

You have to give Xbox some credit for being the first American console to survive in a long time.

KevinnButlerNPK

Atari says hi.

Yeah/ the orginal Atari began in the early 80's died off in 1984 and never really recovered since the crash, I wouldn't exactly call an event 27 years ago as surviving. The Atari now is an old french company called Infograms....

Yeah, but if you combine Atari inc (1972-1984) and Atari Corporation (1984-1996) it is the longest running American Console. With Atari 2600 starting in 1977 and ending with the Jaguar in 1996.

Avatar image for RavenLoud
RavenLoud

2874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 RavenLoud
Member since 2009 • 2874 Posts

Sega>MS.

There I said it.

Avatar image for KevinnButlerNPK
KevinnButlerNPK

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 KevinnButlerNPK
Member since 2010 • 1145 Posts

Sega>MS.

There I said it.

RavenLoud

Sega > alll

Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts

Sega>MS.

There I said it.

RavenLoud
you're acting as if this is some bold statement lol ... its as accurate as you can get.
Avatar image for RavenLoud
RavenLoud

2874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 RavenLoud
Member since 2009 • 2874 Posts
[QUOTE="RavenLoud"]

Sega>MS.

There I said it.

rasengan2552
you're acting as if this is some bold statement lol ... its as accurate as you can get.

Never was a fan of Sega myself though, it was bold for me :P I was a zealous Nintendo fanboy back then.
Avatar image for e_stone001
e_stone001

1769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 e_stone001
Member since 2007 • 1769 Posts

[QUOTE="todd2r"]Without Microsoft, who would Sony copy off of? waltefmoney

Nintendo, most likely.

All 3 copy each other, not just Sony alone.
Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

MS is neither the best nor the worst thing in the console market and certainly not both. All three companies have been guilty of nickle and diming their customers, I don't give a crap who you think "introduced" it...

It's amazing how sketchy peoples memories of the last 2 generations are. There is a reason Playstation fanboys were called cows.

T-Aldous

I agree completely, its amazing how cows suddenly forgot all about the over priced stuff for the PS2 and now say that it was all MS.

I agree with both of you as well. The truth has never been spoken.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="jimmypsn"]Its because Microsoft made online gaming on consoles poular and now mainstream.jimmypsn

That is a complete joke online gaming has been popular before the xbox was even launch on PC,the DC was online before the xbox even launch and online gaming on PS2 was more popular than on the xbox,in fact only 2 million users had xbox live on the original xbox,sony sold like 5 million network adapters,that without saying that the PS2 slim had online play out of the box.

hahahaah..wow u believe that?

History lessons. http://www.gaming-age.com/news/2004/7/30-59 Socom 2 logging more play hours than all xbox live games combined world wide,so much for MS making online gaming popular.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="AncientDozer"] I know. I laughed too. Dreamcast's online was a sad joke on dial up and the PS2's online service was woeful and sad.

Hes point wasn't who was good or not,hes point was who made online gaming popular,see the post before this one so you can also get a history lesson.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
Ahh Sony so great just giving us free games out of the blue. Oh wait. PSN was hacked down for a month and people's information and credit cards got stolen.jimmypsn
And sony put a 1 million dollar policy that protect you against theft,there go's the whole argument,also several million people on xbox 360 had been left without console for a month,time in which they could not play anything period not only online but offline as well,at least PS3 owners could play offline,and still happen to this day because RROD still happen to this day,and people still left without playing for weeks and some cases more than a month.
Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

[QUOTE="jimmypsn"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] That is a complete joke online gaming has been popular before the xbox was even launch on PC,the DC was online before the xbox even launch and online gaming on PS2 was more popular than on the xbox,in fact only 2 million users had xbox live on the original xbox,sony sold like 5 million network adapters,that without saying that the PS2 slim had online play out of the box.tormentos

hahahaah..wow u believe that?

History lessons.

http://www.gaming-age.com/news/2004/7/30-59

Socom 2 logging more play hours than all xbox live games combined world wide,so much for MS making online gaming popular.

One game...out of what, hundreds? Wow, neat. Games like Halo 2 & 3 easily beats that.

Avatar image for 93BlackHawk93
93BlackHawk93

8611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#84 93BlackHawk93
Member since 2010 • 8611 Posts

You're half-right.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Wow...just wow...whats next are you going to blame Microsoft for satan? Maybe the riots in Vancouver when they didn't win the Stanley? Global warming and the damage to the ozone layer?

I'll explain most of what was wrong with what you posted.
""While i think that XBL price scheme is horrible and put the majority of the xbox 360 users base in a position where they miss a complete part of a game multiplayer if they don't pay,and have bring a new era of over priced peripherals,nickel and dime and even rise of games to $60 which is attribute to the xbox 360 in special in 2005.""

Except its still undeniable the xbox live service is still better than anything offered on the consoles at this point and time anything else and defending the shortcommings of other services is just fanboy goggles and its as simple as that sheer content and intergration keeps XBL ontop andabsolutely notit puts some of the user base in a postion where they knew the online portion cost money if they wanted it free then they should have moved onto the Wii, Ps3 or PC.

thank god you said new era and saved your self because in the past you've made out that Microsoft is the only one that ever charged such high prices for accessories which then was false and even now with you saying new era is false all you have is the wireless adaptor and harddrive otherwise the ps3 controllers are just as expensive and dont offer near the battery life of the often 40-50 dollar 360 wireless controler+play and charge kits, wireless headset, hdmi cables, usb cables...etc...etc all have the same price and parity and all have 3rd party options on the 360 just like the ps3 for cheaper prices please dont act like high priced accessories are new and that Microsoft is alone in charging high prices for them. Because the official stuff for the 360 might be pricey but its only as pricey as its competitors and often better quality too boot.

Really are you actually blaming Microsoft for 60 dollar games? well damn Sony being the generous charity they are were offering all of their ps3 games for 40 right? they weren't....Oh I guess the fact a year before the 360 was even released analysts were predicting rising game development costs and publishing costs would push the games up 10 dollars...but hey remember back in the cartridge days when games were 20 dollars? wait I didn't pay 70 dollars for quite a few snes games?

It seems to me that Sony commits most of the same things high priced games, high prices accessories but to you thats just good buisness sense for sony when its Microsoft its the devil of the corporate world.

millerlight89

Baker, how about those Ads, eh :lol:

What ad's oh you mean the ones that take all of half a milisecond to bypass do not hamper the experience or speed of NXE *which is confirmed as fast if not faster then XMB* and often *99% of the time* lead to content that either has to do with video games or movies, or dlc on xbox live it self...and often offer free avatars and themes for looking at them?
I mean just recently they had an advertisment for the Windows 7 phone it was a unique little ad actually using my avatar as part of the ad the person on the video talked to my avatar and my avatar reacted and I got a free Windows 7 phone prop for my avatar and it took less then 10 seconds to do it.

Odd how people are so angry at ad's that dont affect them or their gameplay.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="jimmypsn"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] That is a complete joke online gaming has been popular before the xbox was even launch on PC,the DC was online before the xbox even launch and online gaming on PS2 was more popular than on the xbox,in fact only 2 million users had xbox live on the original xbox,sony sold like 5 million network adapters,that without saying that the PS2 slim had online play out of the box.tormentos

hahahaah..wow u believe that?

History lessons. http://www.gaming-age.com/news/2004/7/30-59 Socom 2 logging more play hours than all xbox live games combined world wide,so much for MS making online gaming popular.

eh looks to me like sony spudged their numbers since it has nothing to do with profits and possible income they aren't held to laws such as telling their shareholders the turth...but frankly whats funny is that you think that remained that way...Considering at the end of halo 2's life it had beat the numbers in that article 10 times over.... But please keep acting like a point in time is constant and those numbers didn't change.

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

Defence Force Active!

But seriously, I think MS have done more damage to gaming. Unlike Nintendo and Sony, MS's console are just old PCs stuck in console cases, which is not surprising given the companies background.

The business model of buying exclusives and exclusive day 1 dlc for 'xbox' only etc, is a poison to the industry. Charging for xbla is awful also.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]How? Additional competition in any industry is always good for the consumer.

kuraimen

No it's not always good, it depends on who competes. The way M$ is used to compete is detrimental to the whole industry IMO. I would rather have another less money/power hungry competitor that is not used to use shady tactics to make profits and control the market which M$ is basically the opposite of.

Defence Force Active!

But seriously, I think MS have done more damage to gaming. Unlike Nintendo and Sony, MS's console are just old PCs stuck in console cases, which is not surprising given the companies background.

The business model of buying exclusives and exclusive day 1 dlc for 'xbox' only etc, is a poison to the industry. Charging for xbla is awful also.

tenaka2

We got some confirmed facts here Microsoft introduced every bad thing to the games industry before Microsoft there were no purchased exclusives, no purchased developers, no purchased content...etc
Microsoft intorduced all of these things.

A short excerpt of an interview of Former EA Chief creative Officer Bing Gordonby Gameinformer on his dealings with nintendo and others.

"Nintendo was operating with near monopoly power they had like 95 percent share of the console business, and they had earned it because they took a huge risk. If a publisher wanted to get in bed with the NES, they had to fly to japan, state its case for a development system, andif nintendo deemed it worthy there was only one deal on the table.
Nintendo would sell the company a dev kit for a ridiculous price, and after a game was finished the publisher had to send it to nintnedo, which would ultimately decide whether our not it would be manufactured. Wait, We spend all this time and we build a game but we don't know if we can bring it to market? That's right, and if we decide to bring it to market we manufacture it and we'll tell you how many we'll build you pay us half the cost, and then we manufacture it when we feel like it. When its done in japan you pay the second half of the cost and we release it and you figure out how you want to ship it.
By exerting new total control over any publisher who wanted to work on its platforms, nintendo essentially operated like a legal extortionist under the guise of the license agreement. Even if you created a game that would fly off store shelves if given the opportunity, nintendo could freeze you out of the market if they didn't like the game, decided it was too similar to one of its own games and thus cut into their profits, or felt the content didn't fit with its vision of the console."

Such shady tactics can be attributed to nintendo, Sega, Sony...But no Microsoft introduced all bad things to the industry....20 years before they entered it...

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

Defence Force Active!

But seriously, I think MS have done more damage to gaming. Unlike Nintendo and Sony, MS's console are just old PCs stuck in console cases, which is not surprising given the companies background.

The business model of buying exclusives and exclusive day 1 dlc for 'xbox' only etc, is a poison to the industry. Charging for xbla is awful also.

Avatar image for lowkey254
lowkey254

6031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#90 lowkey254
Member since 2004 • 6031 Posts

They are the best thing because of Live, they are the worst thing because of their money schemes.

Avatar image for boredy-Mcbored
boredy-Mcbored

1566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#91 boredy-Mcbored
Member since 2007 • 1566 Posts
Everybody contributes to gaming with their own quirks. MS is one of them. They aren't bad for the VG industry at all. Nick and Dimming don't really count because Sony did it last gen and Nintendo did overprice the Wii and it's controllers. The XBL interface, making online MUCH more enjoyable and achievements (which makes a 12 hour game last more like 36+) are things that gamers all love and should be glad MS did. Just because you don't like MS doesn't mean you can brush off those contributions.
Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

MS is neither the best nor the worst thing in the console market and certainly not both.All three companies have been guilty of nickle and diming their customers, I don't give a crap who you think "introduced" it..

It's amazing how sketchy peoples memories of the last 2 generations are. There is a reason Playstation fanboys were called cows.

heretrix

This, i suppose though alot of you are too young to remember even last gen. :shock:

Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

[QUOTE="getyeryayasout"]I love the idea that seems to be commonly held here in SW, that $ony and $intendo aren't out to get our $, just M$. It's laughable.rasengan2552
damn those crazy Sony and Nintendo fellows charging us 0$ a year to play online ! and how about those free games that PSN Plus offers ? THIEVES I tell you ! gimme a break Sony and Nintendo are so the opposite of nickle and diming.

Free games, what free games??

I've been a PS+ subscriber since day one and i've yet to get a free game out of it...

Avatar image for KevinnButlerNPK
KevinnButlerNPK

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 KevinnButlerNPK
Member since 2010 • 1145 Posts

[QUOTE="rasengan2552"][QUOTE="getyeryayasout"]I love the idea that seems to be commonly held here in SW, that $ony and $intendo aren't out to get our $, just M$. It's laughable.Snugenz

damn those crazy Sony and Nintendo fellows charging us 0$ a year to play online ! and how about those free games that PSN Plus offers ? THIEVES I tell you ! gimme a break Sony and Nintendo are so the opposite of nickle and diming.

Free games, what free games??

I've been a PS+ subscriber since day one and i've yet to get a free game out of it...

He did forget to mention the fact you have to give up those 'free' PS+ games after you cancel PS+....

Avatar image for deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5

16761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#95 deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
Member since 2006 • 16761 Posts

They are the best thing because of Live, they are the worst thing because of their money schemes.

lowkey254
And Kinect.
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#96 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

Defence Force Active!

But seriously, I think MS have done more damage to gaming. Unlike Nintendo and Sony, MS's console are just old PCs stuck in console cases, which is not surprising given the companies background.

The business model of buying exclusives and exclusive day 1 dlc for 'xbox' only etc, is a poison to the industry. Charging for xbla is awful also.

tenaka2

Why would anyone care about what´s happening inside the plastic box? At the end, that 'old PC' has a huge library of games and have been showing some of the best looking games in this console generation.

Avatar image for John_Read
John_Read

1214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 John_Read
Member since 2009 • 1214 Posts
they made Windows which represents PC gaming
Avatar image for javafriek
javafriek

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 javafriek
Member since 2008 • 752 Posts
[QUOTE="lowkey254"]

They are the best thing because of Live, they are the worst thing because of their money schemes.

khoofia_pika
And Kinect.

How is that any different from PS Move and Wii? I don't have a Kinect nor am I interested in it but seriously you can't down a company, whether it be Nintendo Sony or MS, for manufacturing a product that people will buy. Nintendo had huge success so Sony and MS are just riding the motion controlled wave. It doesn't interest me so I don't buy it, you don't have to either.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
One game...out of what, hundreds? Wow, neat. Games like Halo 2 & 3 easily beats that.garland51
Halo 2 sold what 9 million copies vs Socom 2, 2 millions.? lol And by the time Halo 3 came out online play was already popular don't lie to your self,then again online play has been popular for ages on PC,so saying MS make online gaming popular with the xbox is a lie,just as big as the one about making FPS popular when Golden Eye for N64 sold as much as Halo did year before Halo and the xbox even existed. Either way Socom since 1 was very popular online and with voice chat,in fact PS2 owners where playing online before xbox owners and with voice chat as well,so actually giving credit to MS for something they did not do is silly,what will be next MS make analogues popular or shoulder buttons.
Avatar image for KevinnButlerNPK
KevinnButlerNPK

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 KevinnButlerNPK
Member since 2010 • 1145 Posts

[QUOTE="garland51"]One game...out of what, hundreds? Wow, neat. Games like Halo 2 & 3 easily beats that.tormentos
Halo 2 sold what 9 million copies vs Socom 2, 2 millions.? lol And by the time Halo 3 came out online play was already popular don't lie to your self,then again online play has been popular for ages on PC,so saying MS make online gaming popular with the xbox is a lie,just as big as the one about making FPS popular when Golden Eye for N64 sold as much as Halo did year before Halo and the xbox even existed. Either way Socom since 1 was very popular online and with voice chat,in fact PS2 owners where playing online before xbox owners and with voice chat as well,so actually giving credit to MS for something they did not do is silly,what will be next MS make analogues popular or shoulder buttons.

Wow PS2 owners were capable of creating parties of 8 and chatting with them even if they weren't playing the same game online?