MS plan to topple Sony....quite ingenious.

  • 103 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Marcus-360
Marcus-360

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Marcus-360
Member since 2008 • 134 Posts

Sony tends to release a new console every 6 years. PS1 = 1994, PS2 = 2000, PS3 2006. PS4 will very likely launch on holiday 2012. It wont be any sooner because Sony surely wants to get the most out of PS3.

Xbox had a 4 year cycle (2001-2005). It is rumored that MS will launch the next xbox in a 5 year cycle. This suggests holiday 2010.

This would give MS a 2 YEAR jump on Sony. Nintendo is irrelevant as MS clearly has its eyes on Sony. This will force Sony to either rush the PS4 and cut short the PS3. The PS1 and PS2 had 10 year cycles no problem, but PS3 is in third, and is a financial black hole. The next Xbox will cut it short.

Now, we are at a point where graphics wont be getting much better. Even if PS4 has better graphics power then the 2 year younger Xbox, the games will still look similar....only the most hardcore will see a difference. In the 2 years, MS will have massive dev support, devs will be experienced and will yet again make Xbox games and port them down to the PS4.

I also think MS will elarn from cows this gen....by making all the changes based on cow complaints. There will be a standard harddrive, wifi, reliability, and an internal bluray player. Live will still cost money but MS will obviously include new features to justify it.

Next gen, Sony doesnt have a chance against MS. As for Nintendo, as a lemming I could care less. The war is against SOny, not Nintendo.

Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts
stop ghost...just stop :cry:
Avatar image for BobHipJames
BobHipJames

3126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 BobHipJames
Member since 2007 • 3126 Posts

Teh theerays.

Okay, Microsoft needs to die. They make me cry inside. Crappy products.

Avatar image for TenP
TenP

3338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#5 TenP
Member since 2006 • 3338 Posts
SONY HAS NO CHANCE!!!!
Avatar image for 15strong
15strong

2806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 15strong
Member since 2007 • 2806 Posts
How about lets just focus on this gen. The reason you are looking towards the next generation is becasue sony has a really good chance of beating microsoft and you made this stupid wild speculation to make you feel like microsft is the king. You shouldnt even own a console if you are already looking foward to the next console and not enjoying the one you have.
Avatar image for zassimick
zassimick

10471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 142

User Lists: 2

#8 zassimick  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 10471 Posts

That's not all that ingenious. :| And Sony has stated they have a ten year plan for the PS3. Whether they keep to that or not is up for debate.

Besides, who knows how much powerful graphics will get by next gen or how many people will want to jump on to the next gen so quickly, etc. Many factors... but we'll see what happens I guess.

Avatar image for kadomony1988
kadomony1988

510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 kadomony1988
Member since 2007 • 510 Posts
well, maybe it would be a bad idea for M$ to release the next xbox so soon(in theory i know,i know no release date has been announced), maybe they could use the time to make sure there are not hardware flaws like in the 360. hardware quality needs to be more of a concerne than hardware sales
Avatar image for Marcus-360
Marcus-360

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Marcus-360
Member since 2008 • 134 Posts

This thread is stupid. You can't predict the future. Nobody knows so please shut you fu****g mouth fanboy.OutlawStarXIII

did i hit a nerve? PS2 was king. Ps3 is a former honor roll student that is now getting F's, only to get a C by the end of the year.

PS4 will be sooo late to the next gen party itll be too late.

Avatar image for -RROD-
-RROD-

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 -RROD-
Member since 2008 • 73 Posts
Im guessing but when PS3 tops 360 in sales, then M$ will announce the 720 lol
Avatar image for deactivated-5c009341336cd
deactivated-5c009341336cd

1855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-5c009341336cd
Member since 2004 • 1855 Posts

makes sense to me

should be an intense battle for 2nd place

Avatar image for Patatopan
Patatopan

1890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 Patatopan
Member since 2008 • 1890 Posts
If that is the case, then I would still keep the ps3 becuase I don't want to work up another generation of money to get ANOTHER console already. And plus, i would wait for PS4, and if it won't come out then aww well.
Avatar image for Marcus-360
Marcus-360

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Marcus-360
Member since 2008 • 134 Posts

How about lets just focus on this gen. The reason you are looking towards the next generation is becasue sony has a really good chance of beating microsoft and you made this stupid wild speculation to make you feel like microsft is the king. You shouldnt even own a console if you are already looking foward to the next console and not enjoying the one you have.15strong

i still happily game this generation.

im just happy MS is finally gaining some foothold in the industry, and that sony is going nowhere but downhill (in comparison to PS2).

I am 100% sure MS will release early next gen, only this time with a reliable console.

Avatar image for SSCyborg
SSCyborg

7625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 SSCyborg
Member since 2007 • 7625 Posts
He's back. :)
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
Then each console will be going in its own direction.
Avatar image for 12345yon
12345yon

1073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#18 12345yon
Member since 2007 • 1073 Posts
each console has it different plan, i dont like the MS plan tough, because releasing your console 2 years before competition give the competition an idea of how can they make a better better console
Avatar image for Jack_Bauer07
Jack_Bauer07

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Jack_Bauer07
Member since 2006 • 1141 Posts

That's strange, my time machine doesn't seem to be working, may I borrow yours? Oh right, no one lives in the future.:|

Avatar image for Marcus-360
Marcus-360

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Marcus-360
Member since 2008 • 134 Posts

each console has it different plan, i dont like the MS plan tough, because releasing your console 2 years before competition give the competition an idea of how can they make a better better console12345yon

true....but MS can easily counter with firmware upgrades.

plus the dev support will be invaluable. Also MS has A LOT more disposable cash then Sony.

Avatar image for vivelaps3
vivelaps3

1060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 vivelaps3
Member since 2007 • 1060 Posts
I'm sure it took you like 2 jours to developp a idea like that, pretty boring.
Avatar image for -DrRobotnik-
-DrRobotnik-

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 -DrRobotnik-
Member since 2008 • 5463 Posts
We need to stick M$ and $ony into a ring and let them fight to the death with plastic sticks. Whoever comes out alive gets the privilege of becoming Nintendo's part-time slave.
Avatar image for Marcus-360
Marcus-360

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Marcus-360
Member since 2008 • 134 Posts

We need to stick M$ and $ony into a ring and let them fight to the death with plastic sticks. Whoever comes out alive gets the privilege of becoming Nintendo's part-time slave.-DrRobotnik-

lol agreed

Avatar image for 12345yon
12345yon

1073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 12345yon
Member since 2007 • 1073 Posts

[QUOTE="12345yon"]each console has it different plan, i dont like the MS plan tough, because releasing your console 2 years before competition give the competition an idea of how can they make a better better consoleMarcus-360

true....but MS can easily counter with firmware upgrades.

plus the dev support will be invaluable. Also MS has A LOT more disposable cash then Sony.

yea but the specs will be the same, and yea :( MS has more money than Sony

i hope the new xbox dont get a RROD

Avatar image for patrickjw333
patrickjw333

809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 patrickjw333
Member since 2004 • 809 Posts

This thread is stupid. You can't predict the future. Nobody knows so please shut you fu****g mouth fanboy.OutlawStarXIII

LMAO

LMAO

Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts

each console has it different plan, i dont like the MS plan tough, because releasing your console 2 years before competition give the competition an idea of how can they make a better better console12345yon

Very true. Also, releasing that early ahead of the competition allows them to release hardware 2 years more advanced. They would be better off releasing just a year ahead but this time ensuring the hardware is ready for release and they have designed the best console they possibly could. Do that and still release a year ahead would be a much better game plan if you ask me.

Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#28 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts
Your assumption that sony would rush the PS3 is very flawed. They've committed to long life cycle and would probably not care. A new xbox would be as relavent to them as the psp slim was relavant to nintendo when it came to the DS.
Avatar image for ff7isnumbaone
ff7isnumbaone

5352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 ff7isnumbaone
Member since 2005 • 5352 Posts

Sony tends to release a new console every 6 years. PS1 = 1994, PS2 = 2000, PS3 2006. PS4 will very likely launch on holiday 2012. It wont be any sooner because Sony surely wants to get the most out of PS3.

Xbox had a 4 year cycle (2001-2005). It is rumored that MS will launch the next xbox in a 5 year cycle. This suggests holiday 2010.

This would give MS a 2 YEAR jump on Sony. Nintendo is irrelevant as MS clearly has its eyes on Sony. This will force Sony to either rush the PS4 and cut short the PS3. The PS1 and PS2 had 10 year cycles no problem, but PS3 is in third, and is a financial black hole. The next Xbox will cut it short.

Now, we are at a point where graphics wont be getting much better. Even if PS4 has better graphics power then the 2 year younger Xbox, the games will still look similar....only the most hardcore will see a difference. In the 2 years, MS will have massive dev support, devs will be experienced and will yet again make Xbox games and port them down to the PS4.

I also think MS will elarn from cows this gen....by making all the changes based on cow complaints. There will be a standard harddrive, wifi, reliability, and an internal bluray player. Live will still cost money but MS will obviously include new features to justify it.

Next gen, Sony doesnt have a chance against MS. As for Nintendo, as a lemming I could care less. The war is against SOny, not Nintendo.

Marcus-360

reads first words, looks at tc's name. Laughs. Lol you again.

Avatar image for verbtex
verbtex

9196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#30 verbtex  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 9196 Posts

I don't quite see the smart plan here.

I get that they will have the advantage of 2 years maybe, but still, what if Microsoft decides to give more thorough hardware testing to avoid the RRoD for the next gen and it takes 2 years of testing?

Then, wouldn't that make them both come out at the same time?

Besides, I highly doubt that you of all people really know the future.

Unless you have a cool time machine. Or a lemming crystal ball.:roll:

Avatar image for ff7isnumbaone
ff7isnumbaone

5352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 ff7isnumbaone
Member since 2005 • 5352 Posts
plus sony would just make their console far more superior than MS console.
Avatar image for verbtex
verbtex

9196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#32 verbtex  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 9196 Posts

[QUOTE="12345yon"]each console has it different plan, i dont like the MS plan tough, because releasing your console 2 years before competition give the competition an idea of how can they make a better better consoleMarcus-360

true....but MS can easily counter with firmware upgrades.

plus the dev support will be invaluable. Also MS has A LOT more disposable cash then Sony.

How can you fully tell that their dev support will be great?

Microsoft's 1st party devs aren't so hot.

Plus, how are we sure that more devs won't take the lazy way out, knowing their way around the Xbox360, PS3, and Wii? Why risk the money to create a game for the new console, that might not even work?

I personally, would play it safe and create games for the 7th gen until all the consoles were out for at least a year. Make sure I can get as much money out of those consoles so I have a financial net for the 8th gen.

Otherwise, I risk losing all my money.

So, the dev support theory is a little flawed.

Avatar image for Gun_Haze
Gun_Haze

1010

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Gun_Haze
Member since 2007 • 1010 Posts
GhostMLD has returned. He was such a lame fanboy..
Avatar image for Rocky32189
Rocky32189

8995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Rocky32189
Member since 2007 • 8995 Posts
Yeah, because the Dreamcast destroyed the competition with its 2 year head start. It's bound to happen with Microsoft too.
Avatar image for VendettaRed07
VendettaRed07

14012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 VendettaRed07
Member since 2007 • 14012 Posts
sony has been quoted saying they will never again let MS get a head start like they did this gen.
Avatar image for verbtex
verbtex

9196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#36 verbtex  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 9196 Posts

sony has been quoted saying they will never again let MS get a head start like they did this gen.VendettaRed07

I believe that spells trouble. :?

Avatar image for blues35301
blues35301

2680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 blues35301
Member since 2008 • 2680 Posts
lost credibility at the part where you said graphics dont have that much room to get better. how old are you? we're not even close to the boundries in 5-10 years from now crysis will look like the crappiest game you ever thought looked amazing.
Avatar image for haols
haols

2348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 haols
Member since 2005 • 2348 Posts

Sony tends to release a new console every 6 years. PS1 = 1994, PS2 = 2000, PS3 2006. PS4 will very likely launch on holiday 2012. It wont be any sooner because Sony surely wants to get the most out of PS3.

Xbox had a 4 year cycle (2001-2005). It is rumored that MS will launch the next xbox in a 5 year cycle. This suggests holiday 2010.

This would give MS a 2 YEAR jump on Sony. Nintendo is irrelevant as MS clearly has its eyes on Sony. This will force Sony to either rush the PS4 and cut short the PS3. The PS1 and PS2 had 10 year cycles no problem, but PS3 is in third, and is a financial black hole. The next Xbox will cut it short.

Now, we are at a point where graphics wont be getting much better. Even if PS4 has better graphics power then the 2 year younger Xbox, the games will still look similar....only the most hardcore will see a difference. In the 2 years, MS will have massive dev support, devs will be experienced and will yet again make Xbox games and port them down to the PS4.

I also think MS will elarn from cows this gen....by making all the changes based on cow complaints. There will be a standard harddrive, wifi, reliability, and an internal bluray player. Live will still cost money but MS will obviously include new features to justify it.

Next gen, Sony doesnt have a chance against MS. As for Nintendo, as a lemming I could care less. The war is against SOny, not Nintendo.

Marcus-360

Dude seriously get a clue.
You know people said that when Geforce 3 line came out?
It is right up there amongst the most uninformed statements there is. . .

The games on the next consoles will look similar, not because "graphics can't evolve", but since most games will be multiplats and therefore not optimised to run better on any system.
Avatar image for nervmeister
nervmeister

15377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 nervmeister
Member since 2005 • 15377 Posts

[QUOTE="Giancar"]stop ghost...just stop :cry:Marcus-360

SW is sooo boring. just trying to shake things up a bit. u guys are a bunch of squares.....

So you ARE GhostMLD.
Avatar image for diped
diped

2005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 diped
Member since 2008 • 2005 Posts
how dare people speculate and make judgements about the future!!!! THEY MUST HAVE CRYSTAL BALLS! No one can guess or specualte without a crystal ball! NO ONEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111
Avatar image for carlisledavid79
carlisledavid79

10522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 carlisledavid79
Member since 2006 • 10522 Posts
People have been saying graphics wont get better for years.
Avatar image for Gamer556
Gamer556

3846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Gamer556
Member since 2006 • 3846 Posts

This is all speculation, but Microsoft would be smart to release their next console at least a year ahead. They got a lot of criticism for rushing the 360 out first, but let's face it, they gained a lot of developer support in that first year. The 360 would not be the console it is today without that head start. If the next Xbox has another year to itself, Sony might not be able to make up the lost ground. They're not the powerhouse they once were.

In the end, I believe that is how the next generation will play out. Sony has taken huge losses on the PS3, and they aren't in the position to release their next console so soon. They need to make that money back. Microsoft is in a good position to take the generation.

Avatar image for Krigon
Krigon

5591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Krigon
Member since 2005 • 5591 Posts

[QUOTE="Giancar"]stop ghost...just stop :cry:Marcus-360

SW is sooo boring. just trying to shake things up a bit. u guys are a bunch of squares.....

Did you just confirm that you are GhostMLD (Ban Dodging)?

Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#44 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

Sony tends to release a new console every 6 years. PS1 = 1994, PS2 = 2000, PS3 2006. PS4 will very likely launch on holiday 2012. It wont be any sooner because Sony surely wants to get the most out of PS3.

Xbox had a 4 year cycle (2001-2005). It is rumored that MS will launch the next xbox in a 5 year cycle. This suggests holiday 2010.

This would give MS a 2 YEAR jump on Sony. Nintendo is irrelevant as MS clearly has its eyes on Sony. This will force Sony to either rush the PS4 and cut short the PS3. The PS1 and PS2 had 10 year cycles no problem, but PS3 is in third, and is a financial black hole. The next Xbox will cut it short.

Now, we are at a point where graphics wont be getting much better. Even if PS4 has better graphics power then the 2 year younger Xbox, the games will still look similar....only the most hardcore will see a difference. In the 2 years, MS will have massive dev support, devs will be experienced and will yet again make Xbox games and port them down to the PS4.

I also think MS will elarn from cows this gen....by making all the changes based on cow complaints. There will be a standard harddrive, wifi, reliability, and an internal bluray player. Live will still cost money but MS will obviously include new features to justify it.

Next gen, Sony doesnt have a chance against MS. As for Nintendo, as a lemming I could care less. The war is against SOny, not Nintendo.

Marcus-360

wern't you banned? why are you back?

Avatar image for tmntPunchout
tmntPunchout

3770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 tmntPunchout
Member since 2007 • 3770 Posts
What the heck.. then I'm just going to buy every other MS console because that's too soon.
Avatar image for Gamer556
Gamer556

3846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Gamer556
Member since 2006 • 3846 Posts
[QUOTE="Marcus-360"]

[QUOTE="12345yon"]each console has it different plan, i dont like the MS plan tough, because releasing your console 2 years before competition give the competition an idea of how can they make a better better consoleverbtex

true....but MS can easily counter with firmware upgrades.

plus the dev support will be invaluable. Also MS has A LOT more disposable cash then Sony.

How can you fully tell that their dev support will be great?

Microsoft's 1st party devs aren't so hot.

Plus, how are we sure that more devs won't take the lazy way out, knowing their way around the Xbox360, PS3, and Wii? Why risk the money to create a game for the new console, that might not even work?

I personally, would play it safe and create games for the 7th gen until all the consoles were out for at least a year. Make sure I can get as much money out of those consoles so I have a financial net for the 8th gen.

Otherwise, I risk losing all my money.

So, the dev support theory is a little flawed.

It's not a flawed theory, it's a proven one. Look at how much dev support Microsoft has gained in just one generation. Everyone will mention the Dreamcast, but Sega was a dying company going into the generation. Microsoft hasn't seen rough times in, well... forever.

Avatar image for sargentbotk
sargentbotk

4224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 sargentbotk
Member since 2007 • 4224 Posts
Lol...Both Sony and Microsoft are awesome. I expect good things from them next gen :)
Avatar image for 0rin
0rin

7179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#48 0rin
Member since 2006 • 7179 Posts

Next gen, Sony doesnt have a chance against MS. As for Nintendo, as a lemming I could care less. The war is against SOny, not Nintendo.

Marcus-360


Why didn't you just save my time and only post that bit? As a lemming, your opinion is clearly bias, and not relative to my interests. I was expecting to see some actual linkage, or at least believable logic. Your logic isn't even believable by system wars standards.
Avatar image for dr_jashugan
dr_jashugan

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#49 dr_jashugan
Member since 2006 • 2665 Posts

Sony tends to release a new console every 6 years. PS1 = 1994, PS2 = 2000, PS3 2006. PS4 will very likely launch on holiday 2012. It wont be any sooner because Sony surely wants to get the most out of PS3.

Xbox had a 4 year cycle (2001-2005). It is rumored that MS will launch the next xbox in a 5 year cycle. This suggests holiday 2010.

This would give MS a 2 YEAR jump on Sony. Nintendo is irrelevant as MS clearly has its eyes on Sony. This will force Sony to either rush the PS4 and cut short the PS3. The PS1 and PS2 had 10 year cycles no problem, but PS3 is in third, and is a financial black hole. The next Xbox will cut it short.

Now, we are at a point where graphics wont be getting much better. Even if PS4 has better graphics power then the 2 year younger Xbox, the games will still look similar....only the most hardcore will see a difference. In the 2 years, MS will have massive dev support, devs will be experienced and will yet again make Xbox games and port them down to the PS4.

I also think MS will elarn from cows this gen....by making all the changes based on cow complaints. There will be a standard harddrive, wifi, reliability, and an internal bluray player. Live will still cost money but MS will obviously include new features to justify it.

Next gen, Sony doesnt have a chance against MS. As for Nintendo, as a lemming I could care less. The war is against SOny, not Nintendo.

Marcus-360

That wont happen if the CURSE of RRoD spreads to the X720. :lol:
Avatar image for TreetarD93
TreetarD93

601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#50 TreetarD93
Member since 2007 • 601 Posts

[QUOTE="OutlawStarXIII"]This thread is stupid. You can't predict the future. Nobody knows so please shut you fu****g mouth fanboy.Marcus-360

did i hit a nerve? PS2 was king. Ps3 is a former honor roll student that is now getting F's, only to get a C by the end of the year.

PS4 will be sooo late to the next gen party itll be too late.

hmm, you still sound like an 11 year old who can only afford 1 console. so once again, shut your mouth, fanboy.