multiplats that require more than one DVD9 look better on Ps3

why's that?

is the disk capacity really that important?

why do games like Dragon Age Origins and Final Fantasy XIII look better on the Ps3?

Does bluray give the ps3 an advantage in terms of graphics when there's a lot of data to be put in one disk?

edit: so, someone stops pretending they don't get what I'm saying, just to make fun of my poor english.

why's that? can the support really be the reason why games like Dragon Age Origins and Final Fantasy XIII look better on the Ps3?

I fail to see how bluray can give an advantatge in terms of graphics than the dvd9?

Metroid_Other_M

Are you a Cow, a Lem, or a Sheep. What the heck is this thread even about >.>

What are you trying to say?

compression. they wanted to fit Final Fantasy on as few discs as possible, so they may have lowered the resolution as well.

And Dragon Age is on one disc on Pc and it looks better than the consoles counterpart because of the uncompressed textures.

Some FFXIII you see out there showing the 360 version looking so bad compared to the ps3 are likely some altered pictures. The difference should be minimal.

Um, ok. :?

why's that? can the support really be the reason why games like Dragon Age Origins and Final Fantasy XIII look better on the Ps3?

I fail to see how bluray can give an advantatge in terms of graphics than the dvd9?

GTA4.

why's that? can the support really be the reason why games like Dragon Age Origins and Final Fantasy XIII look better on the Ps3?

I fail to see how bluray can give an advantatge in terms of graphics than the dvd9?

I'm neither a cow nor a lem nor a hermit.

I'm just wondering why multiplats that require multiple discs on the 360 look better on the ps3. And I cited Dragon Age Origins and Final Fantasy XIII.

So my question is the following: is the size of a game a crucial factor of how good it'll look respectively on the 360 and ps3? and again, is it thanks to bluray that the aforementioned multiplats look better on the ps3?

GTA4.

MC3887

I'm neither a cow nor a lem nor a hermit.

I'm just wondering why multiplats that require multiple discs on the 360 look better on the ps3. And I cited Dragon Age Origins and Final Fantasy XIII.

So my question is the following: is the size of a game a crucial factor of how good it'll look respectively on the 360 and ps3? and again, is it thanks to bluray that the aforementioned multiplats look better on the ps3?

Metroid_Other_M

Any game can look the same on the 360 as the PS3 if you have enough disks. :P Anyways, with the exception of Dragon Age: Origins and Bayonetta, the difference between the graphics and performance between the two consoles is minimum. In fact, many games look BETTER on the 360 than on the PS3.

I'm neither a cow nor a lem nor a hermit.

I'm just wondering why multiplats that require multiple discs on the 360 look better on the ps3. And I cited Dragon Age Origins and Final Fantasy XIII.

So my question is the following: is the size of a game a crucial factor of how good it'll look respectively on the 360 and ps3? and again, is it thanks to bluray that the aforementioned multiplats look better on the ps3?

Metroid_Other_M

[QUOTE="Metroid_Other_M"]

I'm neither a cow nor a lem nor a hermit.

I'm just wondering why multiplats that require multiple discs on the 360 look better on the ps3. And I cited Dragon Age Origins and Final Fantasy XIII.

So my question is the following: is the size of a game a crucial factor of how good it'll look respectively on the 360 and ps3? and again, is it thanks to bluray that the aforementioned multiplats look better on the ps3?

italygamer

The thing is they have to compress the textures rediculusly. That is why Dragon age looked worse on X360 and the same reason why caramack said the X360 version would probably have worse textures.

[QUOTE="italygamer"][QUOTE="Metroid_Other_M"]

I'm neither a cow nor a lem nor a hermit.

I'm just wondering why multiplats that require multiple discs on the 360 look better on the ps3. And I cited Dragon Age Origins and Final Fantasy XIII.

So my question is the following: is the size of a game a crucial factor of how good it'll look respectively on the 360 and ps3? and again, is it thanks to bluray that the aforementioned multiplats look better on the ps3?

MC3887

The thing is they have to compress the textures rediculusly. That is why Dragon age looked worse on X360 and the same reason why caramack said the X360 version would probably have worse textures.

I didnt even read the post,I just read "Long big size" and felt likeposting this.

. Its like a small balls guy compaired to a gorrilla balls guy

King_Dweedle

Its not about the size.

I... Don't understand... :?

So confused.

Also, since when does FFXIII look better on PS3? No reputable source has done a comparison yet, and GS said that gameplay looks slightly better on 360, whilst FMV's look slightly better on PS3.

I'm not too sure about that. The only games I know that are better on the PS3 as "big sized games" is Oblivion and Dragon Age. Honestly, I think they are nearly identical.

And Fallout 3 looks better on 360...

I'm neither a cow nor a lem nor a hermit.

I'm just wondering why multiplats that require multiple discs on the 360 look better on the ps3. And I cited Dragon Age Origins and Final Fantasy XIII.

So my question is the following: is the size of a game a crucial factor of how good it'll look respectively on the 360 and ps3? and again, is it thanks to bluray that the aforementioned multiplats look better on the ps3?

Metroid_Other_M

"However, we noticed at this stage that the movies on the Xbox 360 suffered from more compression than on the PlayStation 3, while the Xbox 360 had an overall crisper image quality in the main game." Gamespot

*head asplodes*

So you like long big size games?

LOL @ people who are pretending to not understand what he's talking about. You know what he's talking.XenogearsMaster

Oh now I get it. He must be talking about GTA 4 and Fallout 3!

[QUOTE="XenogearsMaster"]LOL @ people who are pretending to not understand what he's talking about. You know what he's talking.EndorphinMaster

Oh now I get it. He must be talking about GTA 4 and Fallout 3!

"long big size games"...lolwut

So confused.

Also, since when does FFXIII look better on PS3? No reputable source has done a comparison yet, and GS said that gameplay looks slightly better on 360, whilst FMV's look slightly better on PS3.

lundy86_4

Yeah, and IGN said otherwise, so we just have to wait until the game is actually out before making false claims.

what exactly does "slightly better" mean? Is it when you pause the game and you can see minute differences between two identical games that play pretty much identically. When the game is in full motion there is no way to see the difference. I own both hd consoles and i find it difficult to believe that these small differences actually affect game play or graphics(while in motion).

compression. they wanted to fit Final Fantasy on as few discs as possible, so they may have lowered the resolution as well.

And Dragon Age is on one disc on Pc and it looks better than the consoles counterpart because of the uncompressed textures.

Some FFXIII you see out there showing the 360 version looking so bad compared to the ps3 are likely some altered pictures. The difference should be minimal.

italygamer

No games designed for the bluray with loads of extra content look better.

I've been seeing all this stuff about stuff getting cut in the case of lost planet 2 it seems they designed all the content for bluray so of course they're gonna cut something and nothing in ff13 has been shown to have been cut because of DVD.

*the fact the games content that was cut was cut before the 360 version was even announced*

What did they want to keep? the interntional racing mode in lost planet 2? it seems to be developers are no longer trying to practice smart game design and just throwing every single thing they can in.

[QUOTE="italygamer"]

compression. they wanted to fit Final Fantasy on as few discs as possible, so they may have lowered the resolution as well.

And Dragon Age is on one disc on Pc and it looks better than the consoles counterpart because of the uncompressed textures.

Some FFXIII you see out there showing the 360 version looking so bad compared to the ps3 are likely some altered pictures. The difference should be minimal.

gamewhat

[QUOTE="MC3887"]

GTA4.

italygamer

Not really, There have been serveral head to head comparions that liked the Ps3 version better. Especially due to the fact it has alot less pop in and a better framerate.

why's that? can the support really be the reason why games like Dragon Age Origins and Final Fantasy XIII look better on the Ps3?

I fail to see how bluray can give an advantatge in terms of graphics than the dvd9?

Metroid_Other_M

[QUOTE="Metroid_Other_M"]

why's that? can the support really be the reason why games like Dragon Age Origins and Final Fantasy XIII look better on the Ps3?

I fail to see how bluray can give an advantatge in terms of graphics than the dvd9?

SaltyMeatballs

It usually comes down to compressed textures on DVD9 vs Blu-Ray...This is also why most PS3 games have better sound and support for 7.1 ibelieve. Sometimes its just because a dev knows what they are doing and programs the game for the PS3 1st then ports it over the 360 which "MOST" of the time it results in a "slightly" better game... I.E EA who makes all their games 1st on PS3 then ports over. You can see this in Deadspace, Burnout, Dante's Inferno. Before anyone rants about ghostbusters, those dev's where just POS. However if you dev on the 360 1st then port over to the PS3 things usually turn out sub par. I.E. Bayonetta...

Ugh, everybody just stop posting so this thread can sink.

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"][QUOTE="Metroid_Other_M"]

why's that? can the support really be the reason why games like Dragon Age Origins and Final Fantasy XIII look better on the Ps3?

I fail to see how bluray can give an advantatge in terms of graphics than the dvd9?

windsquid9000

Mirror's edge is ps3 to 360 and look how that turned out...

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"][QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"] GTA and Fallout 3 look better on the 360.MC3887

Mirror's edge is ps3 to 360 and look how that turned out...

It looked better on PS3 but it was close.

And Fallout 3 looks better on 360...

mitu123

why's that? can the support really be the reason why games like Dragon Age Origins and Final Fantasy XIII look better on the Ps3?

I fail to see how bluray can give an advantatge in terms of graphics than the dvd9?

Metroid_Other_M

This is BluRay vs DVD9 again. Most games does'nt need BluRay this gen, but when making a huge game world with a long story and high quality movies, it is necessary. I just wonder how much time the devs are using to plan what they can and can not have in a game, and how much they'll have to compress the audio, video, and textures?? These problems does not exist on the PS3 to the same extent.

Rockstar pushed the DVD9 format on the X360(6.8GB) with GTA4, I think that gave them some headaches in addition to the porting over to the PS3 of course. Rockstar have stated that they will have problems making the next GTA, since every GTA is bigger than the last one. They did'nt have these problems last gen. GTA3 was less than 1GB, Vice City was over 1 GB, and GTA SA was 3GB. A game like GTA SA this generation is impossible on the X360.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

And Fallout 3 looks better on 360...

supersaiyen

Not to mention the 360 version has 4xAA while the PS3 version has NONE, it's a jagfest!

[QUOTE="italygamer"][QUOTE="Metroid_Other_M"]

I'm neither a cow nor a lem nor a hermit.

I'm just wondering why multiplats that require multiple discs on the 360 look better on the ps3. And I cited Dragon Age Origins and Final Fantasy XIII.

So my question is the following: is the size of a game a crucial factor of how good it'll look respectively on the 360 and ps3? and again, is it thanks to bluray that the aforementioned multiplats look better on the ps3?

MC3887

The thing is they have to compress the textures rediculusly. That is why Dragon age looked worse on X360 and the same reason why caramack said the X360 version would probably have worse textures.

i thought they did that to maintain framerate while the PS3 version has a slower framerate and some v-sync issues

i mean both versions are have barely any graphical differences when taken into context

LOL @ people who are pretending to not understand what he's talking about. You know what he's talking.XenogearsMaster

[QUOTE="XenogearsMaster"]LOL @ people who are pretending to not understand what he's talking about. You know what he's talking.aia89

LOL the irony.

On topic: In terms of adding more textures or if possible better textures, or any other type of data, yes. The only problem so far has been that it isn't needed but anyways someday it will be nedeed and BD will probably be the sucesor of DVD netx gen for all consoles unless they go the Wii way.

The thing is, people put so much attention to this because of fanboy quarrels.

just think the Pc doesn't need Bluray disks and developers don't complain about it.

On the Ps3 you also need to compress textures. don't believe in wives' old tales.

I believe the Ps3 will just have better audio, cause it's the only thing that they won't need to compress, while on the 360 they need to, if they want to fit all the data into a smaller storage.