MW2 has just been DESTROYED. LMFAO!!! Must see. Link!!!

That really is in game. I saw it myself. There's also a joke about snowmobiles:

"If this was a snowmobile race, I would take you down! Its not a snowmobile... Snowmobiles are for sissies":D

LT_Snake

Them be fightin' words! :twisted: :P

i never said i loved all the battlefield games and all of a suddent hate bc2. i didnt like modern combat for obvious reasons. the first bad company sucked as well i wasnt too big a fan of 2142 when it first came out either. i also never decryed being a fan i said i wasnt a fanboy. im not gonna blindly follow a series and buy whatever the **** comes out. bad company 1 was terrible so im gonna call it out on being **** maybe when a real battlefield comes out thats pc exclusive id be excited for the series again. (not hating on consoles considering im a huge console gamer as well but the battlefield series isnt meant for consoles)

[QUOTE="spliffstar12"][QUOTE="enterawesome"]Why would you continue buying all of them if you don't like them?enterawesome

:shock:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cc6-bCM4l-s

HonkyTonkGamer

I like MW2 but U think BC2 is a tad bit better.

[QUOTE="MasonAaron"]

[QUOTE="MellowMighty"]

MW2 JUST GOT WRECKED

IGN BFBC2 Score: 8.9

IGN MW2 Score: 9.5

SUCK IT COD YOU GOT OOOOOOOOWNED

but the clip did make me laugh.

HonkyTonkGamer

The review was TERRIBLE. They marked it down for saying the story was to intense:? And saying it did not have enough slow spots:? WTF:? So i was scratching my head saying wait they gave MW2 a 9.5 and that did not even have a story:shock: So yeah clearly IGN bought into the hype of MW2 at release and the reviewer who did the BC 2 review from IGN is clearly a heartbeat sensor doushe bag MW2 fanboy:lol:

Yeah, IGN just sucks.

MW2 will score higher :P

Which is sad as BFBC2 beats it in both single player, and multiplayer.

MW2 will score higher :P

Which is sad as BFBC2 beats it in both single player, and multiplayer.

-Snooze-

lol that bfbc thinks its a competitor to mw2

rickatick

:shock:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cc6-bCM4l-s

HonkyTonkGamer

fail mw2 is better.

the bullets shooting through the walls effect the gameplay more because u can only destroy a few things in bad company 2 and u cant shoot through walls like mw2.

[QUOTE="HonkyTonkGamer"]

:shock:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cc6-bCM4l-s

yoyofroyoyoyo

fail mw2 is better.

the bullets shooting through the walls effect the gameplay more because u can only destroy a few things in bad company 2 and u cant shoot through walls like mw2.

[QUOTE="yoyofroyoyoyo"]

[QUOTE="HonkyTonkGamer"]

:shock:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cc6-bCM4l-s

Mystic-G

fail mw2 is better.

the bullets shooting through the walls effect the gameplay more because u can only destroy a few things in bad company 2 and u cant shoot through walls like mw2.

the destruction in bad company 2 doesnt change the gameplay much at all.

shooting through walls effects the gameplay at any part on the map.

while the predetermined destruction only effects gameplay on one part of the map.

IW is smarter than u people think.

modern warfare 2 if would be god if it had full destructibility with the ability to shoot through walls still.

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"][QUOTE="yoyofroyoyoyo"]

fail mw2 is better.

the bullets shooting through the walls effect the gameplay more because u can only destroy a few things in bad company 2 and u cant shoot through walls like mw2.

yoyofroyoyoyo

the destruction in bad company 2 doesnt change the gameplay much at all.

shooting through walls effects the gameplay at any part on the map.

while the predetermined destruction only effects gameplay on one part of the map.

Flattening a small forest so your snipers can get clear shots is a much smaller change to the map, then shooting through a door ...

[QUOTE="yoyofroyoyoyo"]

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"] Bullets shooting through walls effect gameplay more than changing the environment you play in.... really think about that for a moment objectively.-Snooze-

the destruction in bad company 2 doesnt change the gameplay much at all.

shooting through walls effects the gameplay at any part on the map.

while the predetermined destruction only effects gameplay on one part of the map.

Flattening a small forest so your snipers can get clear shots is a much smaller change to the map, then shooting through a door ...

bleh gimmick...on modern warfare 2 u can shoot through a tree.

plus in bad company 2 soldiers guns cant shoot down trees atleast in the demo.

trust me the guns bullets shooting through almost any wall in a level aka mw2 effects the gameplay more than blowing up a few scripted walls in a house and cant shoot through every wall with ur bullets aka bad company 2.

[QUOTE="HonkyTonkGamer"]

:shock:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cc6-bCM4l-s

yoyofroyoyoyo

fail mw2 is better.

the bullets shooting through the walls effect the gameplay more because u can only destroy a few things in bad company 2 and u cant shoot through walls like mw2.

I'm pretty sure you know this part is BS though. Destruction has significant gameplay implications.

Take down a tree, increase visibility for your snipers. Take out a second story wall, now you can toss in a grenade or whatever to deal with potential ambushers. Take out a first story wall, same thing, only you've also created a new entry point, which is useful for certain buildings. Etc. It opens up the possibility for all kinds of tactics and makes the game feel a lot more dynamic and exciting. Also it adds some visual flair.