New Fable over New Zelda ?

[QUOTE="locopatho"]Zelda is one of the greatest franchises in gaming and a personal favourite. Fable is.... a pair of decently fun action adventure games. Ummm.... No contest!Banjo_Kongfooie

The Fable series is going forward while the Zelda series is staying conservative and stuck in it's franchises cliches

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]That's fine if it's a IYO but the GS reviews tell a completely different story. Now to really bring the point home... take the exact same games ( impossible I know. :P ) and switch the systems, ya really think Zelda would score AAA on 360 and ya think Fable with the gorgeous visuals, co-op & larger levels with tons of voice acting would score only AA on Wii ? :shock:IronBass

And you thought Zelda looked good during the demo... It looked very blan (not the artstyle the gameplay) maybe its because it wasn't a dungeon idk but the combat alone looked teribad so they would need amazing puzzles.

[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]That's fine if it's a IYO but the GS reviews tell a completely different story. Now to really bring the point home... take the exact same games ( impossible I know. :P ) and switch the systems, ya really think Zelda would score AAA on 360 and ya think Fable with the gorgeous visuals, co-op & larger levels with tons of voice acting would score only AA on Wii ? :shock:Banjo_Kongfooie

And you thought Zelda looked good during the demo... It looked very blan (not the artstyle the gameplay) maybe its because it wasn't a dungeon idk but the combat alone looked teribad so they would need amazing puzzles.

And you thought Zelda looked good during the demo... It looked very blan (not the artstyle the gameplay) maybe its because it wasn't a dungeon idk but the combat alone looked teribad so they would need amazing puzzles.Banjo_Kongfooie

And you did say that graphics, voice acting, co-op and larger levels were irrelevant IronBass...Banjo_Kongfooie

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]And you did say that graphics, voice acting, co-op and larger levels were irrelevant IronBass...IronBass

LOL the Fable series is a higher pedigree then the Zelda series... I mean the three CD-I games, spin-offs etc. While Fable 1 and 2 are considered great to fantastic.

LOL the Fable series is a higher pedigree then the Zelda series... I mean the three CD-I games, spin-offs etc. While Fable 1 and 2 are considered great to fantastic.Banjo_Kongfooie

[QUOTE="locopatho"]Zelda is one of the greatest franchises in gaming and a personal favourite. Fable is.... a pair of decently fun action adventure games. Ummm.... No contest!Banjo_Kongfooie

The Fable series is going forward while the Zelda series is staying conservative and stuck in it's franchises cliches

Pretty much gonna buy and enjoy both titles

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]LOL the Fable series is a higher pedigree then the Zelda series... I mean the three CD-I games, spin-offs etc. While Fable 1 and 2 are considered great to fantastic.IronBass

Every Fable has been a quality title while every Zelda has not... I am sorry but GS agrees with me

I dont care for either, as I dont have a 360 and havnt used my Wiifor over a year (other than netflix)

I used to be a huge Zelda fan but now I have realized they just keep releasing the same game over and over again; for the most part I kept buying them because Ocarine of Time and Majora's mask had such a big impact on me as a kid. After TP however I realize that Nintendo will just keep releasing OOT over and over again. I really enjoyed Majora's mask (step in a different direction and it was a very immersive game with memorable characters). However after playing TP; same puzzles, same story, same everything as OOT except OOT was way better. As for Fable I enjoyed the first one, didnt play the second one probably wont play the third unless it comes to PC.

[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]LOL the Fable series is a higher pedigree then the Zelda series... I mean the three CD-I games, spin-offs etc. While Fable 1 and 2 are considered great to fantastic.Banjo_Kongfooie

Every Fable has been a quality title while every Zelda has not... I am sorry but GS agrees with me

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]

[QUOTE="IronBass"] That's not true. The Zelda series had some pretty poor entries in the CD-I almost 20 years ago, but every main entry in the series has been awesome. Zelda is one of the biggest and most beloved series in gaming, and has been so since the Nes days. Fable, not even close.Diviniuz

Every Fable has been a quality title while every Zelda has not... I am sorry but GS agrees with me

I am not saying its terrible, he said he knows Zelda SS will be a quality title unlike Fable 3 because the "pedigree" of the franchise

Every Fable has been a quality title while every Zelda has not... I am sorry but GS agrees with meBanjo_Kongfooie

[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]LOL the Fable series is a higher pedigree then the Zelda series... I mean the three CD-I games, spin-offs etc. While Fable 1 and 2 are considered great to fantastic.Banjo_Kongfooie

Every Fable has been a quality title while every Zelda has not... I am sorry but GS agrees with me

[QUOTE="Diviniuz"][QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]

Every Fable has been a quality title while every Zelda has not... I am sorry but GS agrees with me

Banjo_Kongfooie

I am not saying its terrible, he said he knows Zelda SS will be a quality title unlike Fable 3 because the "pedigree" of the franchise

[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]LOL the Fable series is a higher pedigree then the Zelda series... I mean the three CD-I games, spin-offs etc. While Fable 1 and 2 are considered great to fantastic.Banjo_Kongfooie

Every Fable has been a quality title while every Zelda has not... I am sorry but GS agrees with me

GS also agrees that Zelda has 2 GOTY titles, one AAAA title, multiple AAA titles, and a smaller amount of AA titles. Fable has 2 AA games. I guess Fable is better though.

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]

[QUOTE="Diviniuz"] Thats like saying Halo is terrible because of Halo Wars... Doesn't make sense at allDiviniuz

I am not saying its terrible, he said he knows Zelda SS will be a quality title unlike Fable 3 because the "pedigree" of the franchise

I enjoy both, and I can easily say Fable sucks deku nuts next to Zelda.

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]Every Fable has been a quality title while every Zelda has not... I am sorry but GS agrees with meIronBass

Lol a quick search shows that false... Even main series wise LoZ got a 7 and so did crossbow training Zelda II got a 6

[QUOTE="Diviniuz"][QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]

I am not saying its terrible, he said he knows Zelda SS will be a quality title unlike Fable 3 because the "pedigree" of the franchise

siLVURcross

I didn't say it he did, Im using it the way he is saying it is of a higher calibur basically

[QUOTE="siLVURcross"][QUOTE="Diviniuz"] I am confused by your use of pedigree and I am majoring in BiologyBanjo_Kongfooie

I didn't say it he did, Im using it the way he is saying it is of a higher calibur basically

Lol a quick search shows that false... Even main series wise LoZ got a 7 and so did crossbow training Zelda II got a 6Banjo_Kongfooie

Those were exact ports of almost 20-years-old games. :?

You can't use those reviews as an indicative of anything, since those games weren't reivewed when they originally launched.

An exact port of Fable II would not score AA in20 years, either.

[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]Every Fable has been a quality title while every Zelda has not... I am sorry but GS agrees with meBanjo_Kongfooie

Lol a quick search shows that false... Even main series wise LoZ got a 7 and so did crossbow training Zelda II got a 6

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]

[QUOTE="siLVURcross"] I too am confused and I major in networking.siLVURcross

I didn't say it he did, Im using it the way he is saying it is of a higher calibur basically

I major and GS reviews and the numbers do not add up DO THE MATH! No Fable has been below 8 on this site while plenty of Zelda games have with 2 being main series games.

[QUOTE="siLVURcross"][QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]

I didn't say it he did, Im using it the way he is saying it is of a higher calibur basically

Banjo_Kongfooie

I major and GS reviews and the numbers do not add up DO THE MATH! No Fable has been below 8 on this site while plenty of Zelda games have with 2 being main series games.

[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]Every Fable has been a quality title while every Zelda has not... I am sorry but GS agrees with meBanjo_Kongfooie

Lol a quick search shows that false... Even main series wise LoZ got a 7 and so did crossbow training Zelda II got a 6

Wow...Both of those were ports of the original NES games that were TWENTY YEARS OLD.:?

Not getting another Wii just to play Zelda again.

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]

[QUOTE="IronBass"] What Zelda game has not been quality? Every Zelda game reviewed by GS has been AA or higher, so I don't know what you mean with "GS agrees with me".IppoTenma

Lol a quick search shows that false... Even main series wise LoZ got a 7 and so did crossbow training Zelda II got a 6

Again Fable1 for Xbox 8.6/

Lost Chapters for Xbox 8.0/

Lost Chapters for PC 8.6/

Fable 2 8.5/

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]

[QUOTE="IronBass"] What Zelda game has not been quality? Every Zelda game reviewed by GS has been AA or higher, so I don't know what you mean with "GS agrees with me".AmayaPapaya

Lol a quick search shows that false... Even main series wise LoZ got a 7 and so did crossbow training Zelda II got a 6

Wow...Both of those were ports of the original NES games that were TWENTY YEARS OLD.:?

Nintendo Rereleased them as GBA titles not me

[QUOTE="AmayaPapaya"]

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]

Lol a quick search shows that false... Even main series wise LoZ got a 7 and so did crossbow training Zelda II got a 6

Banjo_Kongfooie

Wow...Both of those were ports of the original NES games that were TWENTY YEARS OLD.:?

Nintendo Rereleased them as GBA titles not me

[QUOTE="AmayaPapaya"]

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]

Lol a quick search shows that false... Even main series wise LoZ got a 7 and so did crossbow training Zelda II got a 6

Banjo_Kongfooie

Wow...Both of those were ports of the original NES games that were TWENTY YEARS OLD.:?

Nintendo Rereleased them as GBA titles not me

No, they released them as Classic NES games for the GBA, even the title says so.

I'm a fan of Fable but Zelda>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Fable

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]

[QUOTE="AmayaPapaya"]

Wow...Both of those were ports of the original NES games that were TWENTY YEARS OLD.:?

siLVURcross

Nintendo Rereleased them as GBA titles not me

Nintendo Rereleased them as GBA titles not meBanjo_Kongfooie

The point is not who released them, but what does those review mean in this context.

Which is not much, since they are the reviews of ports of 20 years old games.

Those games weren't reviewed at launch (while both Fable games were), making comparisons invalid.

[QUOTE="siLVURcross"][QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]

Nintendo Rereleased them as GBA titles not me

Diviniuz

I should finish up Phantom Hourglass then :3

[QUOTE="IppoTenma"][QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]

Lol a quick search shows that false... Even main series wise LoZ got a 7 and so did crossbow training Zelda II got a 6

Banjo_Kongfooie

Again Fable1 for Xbox 8.6/

Lost Chapters for Xbox 8.0/

Lost Chapters for PC 8.6/

Fable 2 8.5/

(The review was a few years ago, but you get the idea.)

I'd like to add that Fable II Pub Games got 6.5. kthxbai.siLVURcross

And add to that a rushed spin off scored slightly better than a Main series Zelda title

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"][QUOTE="siLVURcross"]I'd like to add that Fable II Pub Games got 6.5. kthxbai.siLVURcross

I added it as a supplementary fact... JEEZ and fine that doesn't change the fact a rushed spin off of Fable II scored better than a main series Zelda

[QUOTE="siLVURcross"][QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"] That is not a main series title like LoZ 1 and 2 are... If you include that then the Crossbow and CD-i games go inBanjo_Kongfooie

I added it as a supplementary fact... JEEZ and fine that doesn't change the fact a rushed spin off of Fable II scored better than a main series Zelda

[QUOTE="siLVURcross"][QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"] That is not a main series title like LoZ 1 and 2 are... If you include that then the Crossbow and CD-i games go inBanjo_Kongfooie

I added it as a supplementary fact... JEEZ and fine that doesn't change the fact a rushed spin off of Fable II scored better than a main series Zelda

I still don't understand why a port of twenty year old NES game on GBA is considered a main series Zelda game.

And add to that a rushed spin off scored slightly better than a Main series Zelda titleBanjo_Kongfooie

Correction: ports of20 years old main series Zelda titles.

There's a difference. ;)

Fable.That new Zelda looked terrible.At least at E3

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]

[QUOTE="siLVURcross"] You included Crossbow Training in your argument :3siLVURcross

I added it as a supplementary fact... JEEZ and fine that doesn't change the fact a rushed spin off of Fable II scored better than a main series Zelda

Of course Zelda is a more higher regarded series I never questioned that... It should be having been around like 30+ years before Fable but he said Zelda was of higher "pedigree" and you know buying a Zelda game that you will get a good game despite the fact that the Fable franchise is more consistent. 8.6 to 8.5 (only do to new review system)

I mean sure you can say you know OoT 3DS will be of higher "pedigree" but saying you Know SS will be is a bold statement considering the downward spiral of Zelda games and the consistency of Fable games