http://www.nowgamer.com/reviews/ps3/8990/mag-massive-action-game
Never heard of the site but nobody can really be suprised by the score.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
http://www.nowgamer.com/reviews/ps3/8990/mag-massive-action-game
Never heard of the site but nobody can really be suprised by the score.
well 2 reviews one is 8.0 and one 6.8. OUCH. In the world of games there are many must have games but it does not seem M.assive. A.ction G.ame is one of them.http://www.nowgamer.com/reviews/ps3/8990/mag-massive-action-game
Never heard of the site but nobody can really be suprised by the score.
LiquidSnake1001
[QUOTE="LiquidSnake1001"]well 2 reviews one is 8.0 and one 6.8. OUCH. In the world of games there are many must have games but it does not seem M.assive. A.ction G.ame is one of them. Actually 3 reviews http://www.thesixthaxis.com/2010/01/25/review-mag/ They gave it an 8/10http://www.nowgamer.com/reviews/ps3/8990/mag-massive-action-game
Never heard of the site but nobody can really be suprised by the score.
CanYouDiglt
well 2 reviews one is 8.0 and one 6.8. OUCH. In the world of games there are many must have games but it does not seem M.assive. A.ction G.ame is one of them. Actually 3 reviews http://www.thesixthaxis.com/2010/01/25/review-mag/ They gave it an 8/10Well considering thesixtheaxis is obviously a pre Sony site and they just barely gave a 8.0 score does not say much either.[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"][QUOTE="LiquidSnake1001"]
http://www.nowgamer.com/reviews/ps3/8990/mag-massive-action-game
Never heard of the site but nobody can really be suprised by the score.
clubsammich91
Also I was positive with Destructiod but come on lets not act like thesixthaxis giving a 8.0 is a good thing
Actually 3 reviews http://www.thesixthaxis.com/2010/01/25/review-mag/ They gave it an 8/10Well considering thesixtheaxis is obviously a pre Sony site and they just barely gave a 8.0 score does not say much either.[QUOTE="clubsammich91"]
[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]well 2 reviews one is 8.0 and one 6.8. OUCH. In the world of games there are many must have games but it does not seem M.assive. A.ction G.ame is one of them.CanYouDiglt
Also I was positive with Destructiod but come on lets not act like thesixthaxis giving a 8.0 is a good thing
Yep, I mean look at the huge advertising for the PS3 exclusive game they have on their homepage.
http://www.thesixthaxis.com/I mean could it be any more obvious?
Not at all surprised the beta was lame.
Never had high hopes for MAG
But Starhawk (Warhawk sequal )now that game will be unmissable.
The review basically bashes it because the console community will not understand how to play the game properly, the concept will be really strange and hard to understand for consolites and apparently the game doesn't have enough to support itself if not played properly.
Well considering thesixtheaxis is obviously a pre Sony site and they just barely gave a 8.0 score does not say much either.[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]
[QUOTE="clubsammich91"] Actually 3 reviews http://www.thesixthaxis.com/2010/01/25/review-mag/ They gave it an 8/10
XturnalS
Also I was positive with Destructiod but come on lets not act like thesixthaxis giving a 8.0 is a good thing
Yep, I mean look at the huge advertising for the PS3 exclusive game they have on their homepage.
http://www.thesixthaxis.com/I mean could it be any more obvious?
I do not understand the point. So what they had a ME2 add? Are you trying to act like the THESIXAXIS is not a pro Sony site?That is the dumbest thing I've ever heard, how many people have bought Modern Warfare 2 and have played at least 1 online match thus far?The review basically bashes it because the console community will not understand how to play the game properly, the concept will be really strange and hard to understand for consolites and apparently the game doesn't have enough to support itself if not played properly.
glez13
[QUOTE="XturnalS"]
[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]Well considering thesixtheaxis is obviously a pre Sony site and they just barely gave a 8.0 score does not say much either.
Also I was positive with Destructiod but come on lets not act like thesixthaxis giving a 8.0 is a good thing
CanYouDiglt
Yep, I mean look at the huge advertising for the PS3 exclusive game they have on their homepage.
http://www.thesixthaxis.com/I mean could it be any more obvious?
I do not understand the point. So what they had a ME2 add? Are you trying to act like the THESIXAXIS is not a pro Sony site?I don't have to "act" they freaking review non-sony games and games not appearing on Sony's console as well as provide coverage on Non-Sony games as well.
Seriously if you would browse the site for 5 minutes you could see that. Not to mention that their reviews aren't out of the ordinary score wise. You haven't proved any bias at all from thesixthaxis and I don't expect that you can because its not there.
But I guess ME2 score from OXM doesn't count either amirite?
I do not understand the point. So what they had a ME2 add? Are you trying to act like the THESIXAXIS is not a pro Sony site?[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]
[QUOTE="XturnalS"]
Yep, I mean look at the huge advertising for the PS3 exclusive game they have on their homepage.
http://www.thesixthaxis.com/I mean could it be any more obvious?
XturnalS
I don't have to "act" they freaking review non-sony games and games not appearing on Sony's console as well as provide coverage on Non-Sony games as well.
Seriously if you would browse the site for 5 minutes you could see that. Not to mention that their reviews aren't out of the ordinary score wise. You haven't proved any bias at all from thesixthaxis and I don't expect that you can because its not there.
But I guess ME2 score from OXM doesn't count either amirite?
Relaxe bro! First off check out the ME2 sticky were I said many times how more reviews are better then a few. Out of 3 reviews though Mag has got two 8.0 and one 6.8. So a average is a "A' game.Well, frankly, between NowGamer and Destructoid I'm more inclined to trust NowGamer. No surprise that MAG is flopping. It never had a lot of buzz in the press.Cherokee_Jack
I'm sure you would! :lol:
anyway....I suggest others read this "review"....not really a review, 98% of it was a complaint about how they didn't know what to do, and felt Zipper didn't make this Noob Friendly.
I am serious.... read it, anyone, that is the only thing they really touch on.... they don't talk about how smooth it runs....they don't talk about Graphics....they don't talk about its features, weapons, etc......all they talk about is how MAG doesn't "explain" itself......um.. ok NowGamer... I can't believe I clicked their link.... also since it wasn't really a review about the game, how did they come to the conclusion of giving it any score...they should have left it blank or incomplete....put no, they put on their thinking hats and analysed the game deeply and came to the conclusion of the precise score of 6 point 8. Brilliant....haha
again...Cherokee_Jack
after reading NowGamer's review....and I'm presuming you read the Destructiod one as well...or it would be folish of you to be "inclined" to trust one over the other if you haven't read both....but either way, I think you are a smart guy and you did read both....so....what made you trust NowGamer's review more than Destructoid (which really did a good job explaining their review)
My favorite line
"
Ally icons on the mini-map should vary according to squad to make it easier, nay possible, to stick with the guys you're supposed to stick with. They don't. Your current squad and platoon orders should be displayed prominently on screen at all times. They're not."[QUOTE="XturnalS"]
[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]I do not understand the point. So what they had a ME2 add? Are you trying to act like the THESIXAXIS is not a pro Sony site?
CanYouDiglt
I don't have to "act" they freaking review non-sony games and games not appearing on Sony's console as well as provide coverage on Non-Sony games as well.
Seriously if you would browse the site for 5 minutes you could see that. Not to mention that their reviews aren't out of the ordinary score wise. You haven't proved any bias at all from thesixthaxis and I don't expect that you can because its not there.
But I guess ME2 score from OXM doesn't count either amirite?
Relaxe bro! First off check out the ME2 sticky were I said many times how more reviews are better then a few. Out of 3 reviews though Mag has got two 8.0 and one 6.8. So a average is a "A' game.These score are what I expected and an A game doesn't mean terrible to me like it does for others. The American grading system where 7 = C isn't how it really is.
7 = Good, not average like a C would suggest. And of course the more reviews the better but simply because a site or mag covers only one console doesn't mean that they are inherently biased as some would suggest. I'm not saying there aren't *****ty websites and magazines but research and comparison of scores are needed to make a final judgment on whether or not a site is worth taking into account or disregarding.
Well, frankly, between NowGamer and Destructoid I'm more inclined to trust NowGamer. No surprise that MAG is flopping. It never had a lot of buzz in the press.Cherokee_Jack
I think the fact that it's just a rote multiplayer shooter with no personality is a little more important in the scoring. Mass Effect 2 though... that game makes me want to drop 500 bucks to build a PC.
That's higher than their ODST score (6.3). I'm still 50/50 on MAG.Floppy_JimA Halo score thats not AAA, and not from a big site either. I might actually take this site seriously...just checked out their Halo3, okami and MGS4 reviews. This site might actually be more credible than GS.
Relaxe bro! First off check out the ME2 sticky were I said many times how more reviews are better then a few. Out of 3 reviews though Mag has got two 8.0 and one 6.8. So a average is a "A' game.[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]
[QUOTE="XturnalS"]
I don't have to "act" they freaking review non-sony games and games not appearing on Sony's console as well as provide coverage on Non-Sony games as well.
Seriously if you would browse the site for 5 minutes you could see that. Not to mention that their reviews aren't out of the ordinary score wise. You haven't proved any bias at all from thesixthaxis and I don't expect that you can because its not there.
But I guess ME2 score from OXM doesn't count either amirite?
XturnalS
These score are what I expected and an A game doesn't mean terrible to me like it does for others. The American grading system where 7 = C isn't how it really is.
7 = Good, not average like a C would suggest. And of course the more reviews the better but simply because a site or mag covers only one console doesn't mean that they are inherently biased as some would suggest. I'm not saying there aren't *****ty websites and magazines but research and comparison of scores are needed to make a final judgment on whether or not a site is worth taking into account or disregarding.
ok if a "A" scrore is all you want out of a game then you should be happy. I say props to you since most people prefer AAA titles but if you prefer "A" games then you should be happy very often and devs should love gamers like you.That's enough for me.
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="clubsammich91"] Really, it isn't flopping. In order for something to flop it has to not reach expectations. Last time I checked the expectations for MAG were pretty low to begin with.II_Seraphim_IIWell, there was hype. Cows suddenly changed their minds during the fallout from the beta, but not too long ago it was teh CoD killer. Dude, like 3 people hyped MAG as the second coming, they were just very vocal. Everyone else was on the fence about it hyping it A-AA.Ok lets be honest at least it was far more then a couple people before the beta. Before the beta the general hype was AAA.
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]Well, frankly, between NowGamer and Destructoid I'm more inclined to trust NowGamer. No surprise that MAG is flopping. It never had a lot of buzz in the press.Afrikanxl
I'm sure you would! :lol:
anyway....I suggest others read this "review"....not really a review, 98% of it was a complain about how they didn't know what to do, and felt Zipper didn't make this Noob Friendly.
I am serious.... read it, anyone, that is the only thing they really touch on.... they don't talk about how smooth it runs....they don't talk about Graphics....they don't talk about its features, weapons, etc......all they talk about is how MAG doesn't "explain" itself......um.. ok NowGamer... I can't believe I clicked their link.... also since it wasn't really a review about the game, how did they come to the conclusion of giving it any score...they should have left it blank or incomplete....put no, they put on their thinking hats and analysed the game deeply and came to the conclusion of the precise score of 6 point 8. Brilliant....haha
again...Cherokee_Jack
after reading NowGamer's review....and I'm presuming you read the Destructiod one as well...or it would be folish of you to be "inclined" to trust one over the other if you haven't read both....but either way, I think you are a smart guy and you did read both....so....what made you trust NowGamer's review more than Destructoid (which really did a good job explaining their review)
I actually haven't read either review. I'm just biased against Destructoid because I hate them.
can't believe people are honestly anti hyping a game. This is truly fanboy at its worst. I said it with halo 3 odst, and I will say this for MAG. If you are a COW, or LEMMIGN hype a game you like. Instead of this bs "oh it is only online game" it will be marked dowwn, or this game graphics are bad. Either hype the game for whether you like it is or stop predicting gamespot reviews. I enjoyed the beta and am hyping the game for good numbers because what I've played was quality.
[QUOTE="Afrikanxl"]
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]Well, frankly, between NowGamer and Destructoid I'm more inclined to trust NowGamer. No surprise that MAG is flopping. It never had a lot of buzz in the press.Cherokee_Jack
I'm sure you would! :lol:
anyway....I suggest others read this "review"....not really a review, 98% of it was a complain about how they didn't know what to do, and felt Zipper didn't make this Noob Friendly.
I am serious.... read it, anyone, that is the only thing they really touch on.... they don't talk about how smooth it runs....they don't talk about Graphics....they don't talk about its features, weapons, etc......all they talk about is how MAG doesn't "explain" itself......um.. ok NowGamer... I can't believe I clicked their link.... also since it wasn't really a review about the game, how did they come to the conclusion of giving it any score...they should have left it blank or incomplete....put no, they put on their thinking hats and analysed the game deeply and came to the conclusion of the precise score of 6 point 8. Brilliant....haha
again...Cherokee_Jack
after reading NowGamer's review....and I'm presuming you read the Destructiod one as well...or it would be folish of you to be "inclined" to trust one over the other if you haven't read both....but either way, I think you are a smart guy and you did read both....so....what made you trust NowGamer's review more than Destructoid (which really did a good job explaining their review)
I actually haven't read either review. I'm just biased against Destructoid because I hate them.
Didn't think you did, :)..... but atleast you are honest, I like that.
this NowGamer place is just desperate for hits, I can't believe the head editor allowed that review.... I don't care about scores too much when getting a game...but as far as reviews, I need details....this "review" felt more like a rant.
[QUOTE="glez13"]That is the dumbest thing I've ever heard, how many people have bought Modern Warfare 2 and have played at least 1 online match thus far?The review basically bashes it because the console community will not understand how to play the game properly, the concept will be really strange and hard to understand for consolites and apparently the game doesn't have enough to support itself if not played properly.
El-Visitante
I think you got it wrong. That is exactly the problem. The console community has grown because of games like MW2 and all the noobs a game like this attracts to gaming. Their arguments say that this kind of players will most probably will never take the time to learn how to play a game like M.A.G properly. So basically it's similar to when people don't get games like Farcry, Crysis or Stalker, because they are used to stuff like Halo, Resistance or MW.
Umm are posters now just grabing reviews from anywhere they can. I mean majority of people never heard of this site.
[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]Just so people know they gave Mass Effect 2 a 9.8mtradr43point is? everyone already knows (except the cows of course) that mass effect 2 is the far superior game.like the 2 can be compared, but us cows won't fret because we'll get a magaton blockbuster within a month and a half that can only be played on the ps3 (not the PC) called GOW3;)
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment