*NEW* MW3 vs BF3 feature - GS says MW3 is better!!??

http://www.gamespot.com/battlefield-3-close-quarters/videos/the-state-of-the-war-modern-warfare-3-vs-battlefield-3-feature-6370306/

Wha... what is this I don't even

BF3 got so much better after the patch. It's like they tripled the playercount.

OF course MW3 is better... nothing is better than CoD games imo

BF3 got so much better after the patch. It's like they tripled the playercount.

ActionRemix

I'm the opposite. I actually find myself loathing the game a lot more now post-patch. For some f*cked up reason DICE increased the suppression and recoil effects which, and I'm not kidding, have practically broke the game, especially on PC. Just have a look at these two videos...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxsbTjPe2fs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fp2OHFL52Is

That said, it's still better than MW3 :lol:

Another IGN-style idiot-baiting feature from Gamespot. Delightful. All this talk about evolving their editorial and it just amounts to a new frontier of sh!t.Cherokee_Jack

No kidding

OF course MW3 is better... nothing is better than CoD games imo

finalstar2007

Yeah guys, lets all get angry that Gamespot likes one game over another, very similar game. This is totally worthy of rage, and there is no such thing as an "opinion".

It's their opinion. *shrugs*

BF3 got so much better after the patch. It's like they tripled the playercount.

ActionRemix

lolno.

It's their opinion. *shrugs*

timmy00

I just find it odd they would say that after they gave BF3 the Best Competitive Multiplayer award while not even nominating MW3.

both are terrible, bought both, hated both

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

BF3 got so much better after the patch. It's like they tripled the playercount.

HavocV3

lolno.

I know right. The suppression is just insane now. All you gotta do is pray and spray in the enemies general direction and they're severely crippled. It basically just boils down to who sees who first, kind of like MW3

UC3 and GeoW3 are better than MW3/BF3

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

BF3 got so much better after the patch. It's like they tripled the playercount.

Master_ShakeXXX

lolno.

I know right. The suppression is just insane now. All you gotta do is pray and spray in the enemies general direction and they're severely crippled. It basically just boils down to who sees who first, kind of like MW3

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

BF3 got so much better after the patch. It's like they tripled the playercount.

Master_ShakeXXX

lolno.

I know right. The suppression is just insane now. All you gotta do is pray and spray in the enemies general direction and they're severely crippled. It basically just boils down to who sees who first, kind of like MW3

OF course MW3 is better... nothing is better than CoD games imo

finalstar2007

Your opinion is dumb and you should feel bad.

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]

BF3 got so much better after the patch. It's like they tripled the playercount.

Master_ShakeXXX

lolno.

I know right. The suppression is just insane now. All you gotta do is pray and spray in the enemies general direction and they're severely crippled. It basically just boils down to who sees who first, kind of like MW3

yep, really annoying when I've got the upper hand on someone then some idiot recon starts shooting at me. Can't even hit the guy when he's not even moving around.

rent-a-servers and a couple weapon tweaks were nice and all (Scar, G3, An-94, SKS all got a nice buff) (famas and frag rounds getting a nerf) Too bad they didn't actually do anything about a lot of the stuff that they were supposed to fix (vaulting, fall damage, bipod, MAV lifting)

Then their lack of Q.A. produced new problems. ex: SOFLAMs that are immune to rocket pods and explosive rounds.

I'd rather deal with the USAS w/ frags and FAMAS again, wasn't as bad as what we got now.

I got bored of both games pretty quickly. Maybe it is because I've played every single Call of Duty and Battlefield game ever made and it is burning me out.

Battlefield 3 is still the better game IMO. Both overall game's map selection sucks, but BF3 has some good maps.

MW3 is **** WACK, straight up.

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

lolno.

HavocV3

I know right. The suppression is just insane now. All you gotta do is pray and spray in the enemies general direction and they're severely crippled. It basically just boils down to who sees who first, kind of like MW3

yep, really annoying when I've got the upper hand on someone then some idiot recon starts shooting at me. Can't even hit the guy when he's not even moving around.

rent-a-servers and a couple weapon tweaks were nice and all (Scar, G3, An-94, SKS all got a nice buff) (famas and frag rounds getting a nerf) Too bad they didn't actually do anything about a lot of the stuff that they were supposed to fix (vaulting, fall damage, bipod, MAV lifting)

Then their lack of Q.A. produced new problems. ex: SOFLAMs that are immune to rocket pods and explosive rounds.

I'd rather deal with the USAS w/ frags and FAMAS again, wasn't as bad as what we got now.

Never thought I'd say this but I do too. As much as I hated the USAS I wouldn't mind going back to those days. The outcome of firefights just feels so random now. It doesn't seem like I have as much control over how things will play out. It's all about dat god damn suppression.

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

OF course MW3 is better... nothing is better than CoD games imo

Wasdie

Your opinion is dumb and you should feel bad.

Your comment is dumber.. never quote me again.. just deal with it.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

OF course MW3 is better... nothing is better than CoD games imo

finalstar2007

Your opinion is dumb and you should feel bad.

Your comment is dumber.. never quote me again.. just deal with it.

Well I just quoted you again, what are you going to do about it?

Nothing, that's what.

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Your opinion is dumb and you should feel bad.

Wasdie

Your comment is dumber.. never quote me again.. just deal with it.

Well I just quoted you again, what are you going to do about it?

Nothing, that's what.

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Your opinion is dumb and you should feel bad.

Wasdie

Your comment is dumber.. never quote me again.. just deal with it.

Well I just quoted you again, what are you going to do about it?

Nothing, that's what.

I'll keep playing MW3 :P

btw i really loving the change in SW rules :oops:

BF3 on consoles does need more players no question maps are WAY TOO BIG

But Mw3 has been hacked AGAIN and is an insant ac130/ fly in the air fest

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Your opinion is dumb and you should feel bad.

Wasdie

Your comment is dumber.. never quote me again.. just deal with it.

Well I just quoted you again, what are you going to do about it?

Nothing, that's what.

BF3 on consoles does need more players no question maps are WAY TOO BIG

fueled-system

Not really a problem if you play Rush or TDM. Conquest can feel a tad empty at times but not too bad. Conquest on Operation Metro is actually a lot more playable in the console versions.

[QUOTE="fueled-system"]

BF3 on consoles does need more players no question maps are WAY TOO BIG

Master_ShakeXXX

Not really a problem if you play Rush or TDM. Conquest can feel a tad empty at times but not too bad. Conquest on Operation Metro is actually a lot more playable in the console versions.

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

[QUOTE="fueled-system"]

BF3 on consoles does need more players no question maps are WAY TOO BIG

Ace6301

Not really a problem if you play Rush or TDM. Conquest can feel a tad empty at times but not too bad. Conquest on Operation Metro is actually a lot more playable in the console versions.

Exactly, which is why that particular map is better on consoles :P

It's not exploitable.

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

lolno.

HavocV3

I know right. The suppression is just insane now. All you gotta do is pray and spray in the enemies general direction and they're severely crippled. It basically just boils down to who sees who first, kind of like MW3

yep, really annoying when I've got the upper hand on someone then some idiot recon starts shooting at me. Can't even hit the guy when he's not even moving around.

rent-a-servers and a couple weapon tweaks were nice and all (Scar, G3, An-94, SKS all got a nice buff) (famas and frag rounds getting a nerf) Too bad they didn't actually do anything about a lot of the stuff that they were supposed to fix (vaulting, fall damage, bipod, MAV lifting)

Then their lack of Q.A. produced new problems. ex: SOFLAMs that are immune to rocket pods and explosive rounds.

I'd rather deal with the USAS w/ frags and FAMAS again, wasn't as bad as what we got now.

Do you guys get suppressed from random sniper pot shots as well? Like a sniper would shot at my general direction and my screen would turn into a blurry mess with any bullets even getting near me or hitting me. That annoys the hell out of me.

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

Not really a problem if you play Rush or TDM. Conquest can feel a tad empty at times but not too bad. Conquest on Operation Metro is actually a lot more playable in the console versions.

Master_ShakeXXX

Exactly, which is why that particular map is better on consoles :P

It's not exploitable.

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] People don't play metro 64 for playability. They play it because you get stupid huge points for minimal effort.Ace6301

Exactly, which is why that particular map is better on consoles :P

It's not exploitable.

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

I know right. The suppression is just insane now. All you gotta do is pray and spray in the enemies general direction and they're severely crippled. It basically just boils down to who sees who first, kind of like MW3

OneLazyAsian

yep, really annoying when I've got the upper hand on someone then some idiot recon starts shooting at me. Can't even hit the guy when he's not even moving around.

rent-a-servers and a couple weapon tweaks were nice and all (Scar, G3, An-94, SKS all got a nice buff) (famas and frag rounds getting a nerf) Too bad they didn't actually do anything about a lot of the stuff that they were supposed to fix (vaulting, fall damage, bipod, MAV lifting)

Then their lack of Q.A. produced new problems. ex: SOFLAMs that are immune to rocket pods and explosive rounds.

I'd rather deal with the USAS w/ frags and FAMAS again, wasn't as bad as what we got now.

Do you guys get suppressed from random sniper pot shots as well? Like a sniper would shot at my general direction and my screen would turn into a blurry mess with any bullets even getting near me or hitting me. That annoys the hell out of me.

Yep, happens all the time. Just gotta duck down and hope somebody doesn't see your ass.

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] People don't play metro 64 for playability. They play it because you get stupid huge points for minimal effort.Ace6301

Exactly, which is why that particular map is better on consoles :P

It's not exploitable.

It's good for some quick hectic fun. A nice little change of pace from the more open maps.

[QUOTE="fueled-system"]

BF3 on consoles does need more players no question maps are WAY TOO BIG

Master_ShakeXXX

Not really a problem if you play Rush or TDM. Conquest can feel a tad empty at times but not too bad. Conquest on Operation Metro is actually a lot more playable in the console versions.

I got bored of the video two minutes in since they really aren't saying anything interesting at all and the feature is based around two crappy games anyway.

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

OF course MW3 is better... nothing is better than CoD games imo

Wasdie

Your opinion is dumb and you should feel bad.

Well if you ain't pro like me you will hate BF3millerlight89

My SPM is higher :P

Yeah guys, lets all get angry that Gamespot likes one game over another, very similar game. This is totally worthy of rage, and there is no such thing as an "opinion".

SPYDER0416

[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

Yeah guys, lets all get angry that Gamespot likes one game over another, very similar game. This is totally worthy of rage, and there is no such thing as an "opinion".

DragonfireXZ95

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

Exactly, which is why that particular map is better on consoles :P

It's not exploitable.

BrunoBRS

What if MW3 actually is better?meetroid8

[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

Yeah guys, lets all get angry that Gamespot likes one game over another, very similar game. This is totally worthy of rage, and there is no such thing as an "opinion".

DragonfireXZ95

Yeah, two modern day, mainstream, arcadey multiplayer focused shooters are NOTHING alike. I mean sure they both have scripted campaigns, are on PC, PS3 and Xbox 360, have multiplayer focused on shooting people to earn XP and unlock new weapons, and are considered competitors, but other then all those things they are nothing alike.

I must be crazy for thinking they are remotely similar, and you must somehow be sane for missing the entire point over one word.