New XBOX in 2-3 Years Confirmed???

  • 105 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts

If Microsoft is indeed shifting developmet to their next gen console already... It would seem that they are quitting this gen a bit early again. Two years seems way too soon... Three years might be about right though.

Source Story.

Avatar image for Microdevine
Microdevine

1126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Microdevine
Member since 2008 • 1126 Posts

Not surprising. But since they are likely just starting on R&D, it'll most likely take 2-3 years to even work on it. So i think we'll all ready for new consoles by 2011-2012. They got Reach coming out next year anyway. So im sure they're not in any rush. I personally am not going to worry about it. MS is actually making money off the 360. Unlike the original Xbox. So being in a hurry to beat the competition isn't nearly as important this time.

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

Funny how a new Halo game signifies a new Xbox

Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#4 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
[QUOTE="Sgt_Hale"]

If Microsoft is indeed shifting developmet to their next gen console already... It would seem that they are quitting this gen a bit early again. Two years seems way too soon... Three years might be about right though.

Source Story.

can't wait to see how it looks, and this one willl probably be he one to last (9+ years) and i'm not suprised really I just wonder how the cows ill react when sony doesn't push the Ps4 until 2 years after XD
Avatar image for Shattered007
Shattered007

3139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 Shattered007
Member since 2007 • 3139 Posts
Are you really surprised by a new console for 2011 or 2012? I don't think they're "shifting development" either. The original Xbox wasn't profitable where's the 360 has been outta the black since early 2007. Trust, as long as there's a market, there will be support for the 360. I think the PS3 has shown that upgrading is a slow and long process.
Avatar image for vikingm03
vikingm03

104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 vikingm03
Member since 2009 • 104 Posts

It would seem that they are quitting this gen a bit early again..

Sgt_Hale

what? how long has the 360 been out for now? I would think even 2 years would make it a fairly long console run.

Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

New consoles rolling our in 2-3 years sound about right to me. I'd say we'd be hearing news about next gen at least by the end of 2011.

Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

Even IF it is in another 2 years, that would be SIX years after 360 launched, which would be typical of most consoles from previous generations. How woule that be "too soon"?

But given the trends of this generation, another 3-4 years seems more likely.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#9 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

What? The Xbox 360 is going to be 4 years old in 11 days (which means it will have nearly outlived its predecessor) and it's still going strong. Two years from now, it will be going on 6 years, which is average for a console's lifespan. That's as long as the PS2 lasted before Sony brought out the PS3.

Besides, MS has already said that they are going to continue to support the Xbox 360 after its successor arrives so there's really nothing to be worried about.

Avatar image for SparkyProtocol
SparkyProtocol

7680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#10 SparkyProtocol
Member since 2009 • 7680 Posts

Even IF it is in another 2 years, that would be SIX years after 360 launched, which would be typical of most consoles from previous generations. How woule that be "too soon"?

But given the trends of this generation, another 3-4 years seems more likely.

AdobeArtist

It wouldn't be too soon at all. Anything past 2012-2013 is complete overkill. 2011-2012 sounds good. (2012 so we get time to play our MP games next year)

Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts

Are you really surprised by a new console for 2011 or 2012? I don't think they're "shifting development" either. The original Xbox wasn't profitable where's the 360 has been outta the black since early 2007. Trust, as long as there's a market, there will be support for the 360. I think the PS3 has shown that upgrading is a slow and long process.Shattered007
I would be VERY surprised at a new console in 2011... unless it came from Nintendo. That is way too early for new consoles from Sony or Microsoft. Frankly, I'd be disappointed with the 360 if a new xbox came that soon. Five years on the market doesn't sound that bad... but in terms of gaming, I'd feel taken advantage of. It seems like we're finally just getting warmed up in terms of great games, and the 360 in particular is already struggling with its pace of great exclusives... The idea of giving up & focusing on the next gen at this point would seem kind of cheap. ESPECIALLY with Natal coming out... I'm sure it's technology that they'll include in the next gen box as well... but I'd rather see them use it to keep this gen fresh.

Don't get me wrong, I've enjoyed a lot of great games this gen... but compared to last gen, we haven't seen nearly the amount of great gaming that was in the PS2 era. And if this gen only had another 2 yrs left in it... I'd have to say it sucked in comparison. That said.... I'd hope Sony would take at least another year to continue maxing out their system at least. Heavy Rain is the most interesting game of this gen for me right now... and I'm hoping to see much more innovation before this gen is out. Guess we'll just have to wait and see.

Avatar image for PBSnipes
PBSnipes

14621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 PBSnipes
Member since 2007 • 14621 Posts

Uh, this is news? Hasn't the general consensus always been that we'll see the next-gen consoles (excluding the Wii HD rumour that pops up every year) in the 2011-2013 time range?

Avatar image for chessik101
chessik101

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 chessik101
Member since 2009 • 43 Posts

wow how whould sony counter this when there loosing money with the ps3,any way i still go buy it if it cameout tommorow.

Avatar image for OreoMilkshake
OreoMilkshake

12833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#14 OreoMilkshake
Member since 2009 • 12833 Posts
Just around the corner.
Avatar image for Shattered007
Shattered007

3139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 Shattered007
Member since 2007 • 3139 Posts

[QUOTE="Shattered007"]Are you really surprised by a new console for 2011 or 2012? I don't think they're "shifting development" either. The original Xbox wasn't profitable where's the 360 has been outta the black since early 2007. Trust, as long as there's a market, there will be support for the 360. I think the PS3 has shown that upgrading is a slow and long process.Sgt_Hale

I would be VERY surprised at a new console in 2011... unless it came from Nintendo. That is way too early for new consoles from Sony or Microsoft. Frankly, I'd be disappointed with the 360 if a new xbox came that soon. Five years on the market doesn't sound that bad... but in terms of gaming, I'd feel taken advantage of. It seems like we're finally just getting warmed up in terms of great games, and the 360 in particular is already struggling with its pace of great exclusives... The idea of giving up & focusing on the next gen at this point would seem kind of cheap. ESPECIALLY with Natal coming out... I'm sure it's technology that they'll include in the next gen box as well... but I'd rather see them use it to keep this gen fresh.

Don't get me wrong, I've enjoyed a lot of great games this gen... but compared to last gen, we haven't seen nearly the amount of great gaming that was in the PS2 era. And if this gen only had another 2 yrs left in it... I'd have to say it sucked in comparison. That said.... I'd hope Sony would take at least another year to continue maxing out their system at least. Heavy Rain is the most interesting game of this gen for me right now... and I'm hoping to see much more innovation before this gen is out. Guess we'll just have to wait and see.

To each there own, I guess. Truthfully, I'm sure we'll hear rumors about the NeXbox in late 2010. Then we'll get slew of facts in mid 2011 (E3) and the release in 2012. But like I said, even if they were to release a new Xbox in 2011, it's not like they'd stop supporting the 360.

Avatar image for vikingm03
vikingm03

104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 vikingm03
Member since 2009 • 104 Posts

wow how whould sony counter this when there loosing money with the ps3,any way i still go buy it if it cameout tommorow.

chessik101
I think this is the more interesting thought. With two major consoles in the market, with sony being one year behind in its life, what will sony do if ms came out with a console in say 2011? They would be forced to release a ps4 within a year right? Otherwise, they would start to be killed in sales.
Avatar image for chessik101
chessik101

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 chessik101
Member since 2009 • 43 Posts

[QUOTE="chessik101"]

wow how whould sony counter this when there loosing money with the ps3,any way i still go buy it if it cameout tommorow.

vikingm03

I think this is the more interesting thought. With two major consoles in the market, with sony being one year behind in its life, what will sony do if ms came out with a console in say 2011? They would be forced to release a ps4 within a year right? Otherwise, they would start to be killed in sales.

i know what you mean sony whould have too push out ps4 to even compete.

Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts

Even IF it is in another 2 years, that would be SIX years after 360 launched, which would be typical of most consoles from previous generations. How woule that be "too soon"?

But given the trends of this generation, another 3-4 years seems more likely.

AdobeArtist

Actually, it would be FIVE years... and as I said in my other post, we just have not received as much in this last three years of gaming as we did last gen. I guess they still have time to improve it, but I just have not been impressed with the rate/quality of 360 exclusives in the last 1-2 yrs (with the exception of Forza). There have been some great multiplats, but last gen had great exclusives for all 3 systems. I feel the PS3 is doing the best in terms of exclusives, but even they are just shadows of their former selves compared to last gen. Bottom line... I think I would just like to see MS devote more 1st part focus to their current system before they jump to the next. Then again, their 2010 is already looking a hellova lot better than 2009 did.

I also think developers are just starting to get the most out of these systems. Which means they can get out more games w/o having to sink as much money into R&D... that's good for us gamers. If they have to start R&D for another gen too soon, we're the ones that get the short end of the stick.

Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts

[QUOTE="Sgt_Hale"]

[QUOTE="Shattered007"]Are you really surprised by a new console for 2011 or 2012? I don't think they're "shifting development" either. The original Xbox wasn't profitable where's the 360 has been outta the black since early 2007. Trust, as long as there's a market, there will be support for the 360. I think the PS3 has shown that upgrading is a slow and long process.Shattered007

I would be VERY surprised at a new console in 2011... unless it came from Nintendo. That is way too early for new consoles from Sony or Microsoft. Frankly, I'd be disappointed with the 360 if a new xbox came that soon. Five years on the market doesn't sound that bad... but in terms of gaming, I'd feel taken advantage of. It seems like we're finally just getting warmed up in terms of great games, and the 360 in particular is already struggling with its pace of great exclusives... The idea of giving up & focusing on the next gen at this point would seem kind of cheap. ESPECIALLY with Natal coming out... I'm sure it's technology that they'll include in the next gen box as well... but I'd rather see them use it to keep this gen fresh.

Don't get me wrong, I've enjoyed a lot of great games this gen... but compared to last gen, we haven't seen nearly the amount of great gaming that was in the PS2 era. And if this gen only had another 2 yrs left in it... I'd have to say it sucked in comparison. That said.... I'd hope Sony would take at least another year to continue maxing out their system at least. Heavy Rain is the most interesting game of this gen for me right now... and I'm hoping to see much more innovation before this gen is out. Guess we'll just have to wait and see.

To each there own, I guess. Truthfully, I'm sure we'll hear rumors about the NeXbox in late 2010. Then we'll get slew of facts in mid 2011 (E3) and the release in 2012. But like I said, even if they were to release a new Xbox in 2011, it's not like they'd stop supporting the 360.

Well that'd be cool if true... but they stopped support of the xbox when the 360 dropped, so I'm not so sure. We'll see though.

Avatar image for get-ka12
get-ka12

1946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 get-ka12
Member since 2009 • 1946 Posts
Wonder what color the ring of death will be next gen. I predict 'blue.'
Avatar image for vikingm03
vikingm03

104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 vikingm03
Member since 2009 • 104 Posts
[QUOTE="get-ka12"]Wonder what color the ring of death will be next gen. I predict 'blue.'

and how do you know it will be a ring? I predict... a triangle of burgandy.
Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts

[QUOTE="vikingm03"][QUOTE="chessik101"]

wow how whould sony counter this when there loosing money with the ps3,any way i still go buy it if it cameout tommorow.

chessik101

I think this is the more interesting thought. With two major consoles in the market, with sony being one year behind in its life, what will sony do if ms came out with a console in say 2011? They would be forced to release a ps4 within a year right? Otherwise, they would start to be killed in sales.

i know what you mean sony whould have too push out ps4 to even compete.

Hmmm, I think it really depends. I mean, you all forget how many ppl are just now upgrading to 'next-gen'... lol, and all the Wii owners still waiting (j/k!). Point is, the PS3 will have only gained even more popularity by that point... so they would really have to price the nextbox right & balance it out with enough attractive tech. And on top of that, they'd need Sony to F up another console launch, lol... which is very possible, but I don't think Sony will make the same mistake back to back. If the Wii has done anything, it has shown us that having a lead means absolutely nothing. If game developers are ready to move on to next gen already, I'm all for it... but considering how few games have been released so far... and how many game devs have gone bankrupt... just seems too soon in the industry to unleash another gen.
Avatar image for Toriko42
Toriko42

27562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 0

#23 Toriko42
Member since 2006 • 27562 Posts
Time sure flies when you're having fun
Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

Even IF it is in another 2 years, that would be SIX years after 360 launched, which would be typical of most consoles from previous generations. How woule that be "too soon"?

But given the trends of this generation, another 3-4 years seems more likely.

Sgt_Hale

Actually, it would be FIVE years... and as I said in my other post, we just have not received as much in this last three years of gaming as we did last gen. I guess they still have time to improve it, but I just have not been impressed with the rate/quality of 360 exclusives in the last 1-2 yrs (with the exception of Forza). There have been some great multiplats, but last gen had great exclusives for all 3 systems. I feel the PS3 is doing the best in terms of exclusives, but even they are just shadows of their former selves compared to last gen. Bottom line... I think I would just like to see MS devote more 1st part focus to their current system before they jump to the next. Then again, their 2010 is already looking a hellova lot better than 2009 did.

I also think developers are just starting to get the most out of these systems. Which means they can get out more games w/o having to sink as much money into R&D... that's good for us gamers. If they have to start R&D for another gen too soon, we're the ones that get the short end of the stick.

Nooooooo. 360 launched in Nov 2005. So in just a few days (as pointed out by Game21) 360 reaches its 4 year mark. Hence again, IF the next console debuts in 2 years, that would make it a SIX year cycle for this console.

And I'm still pretty sure, as most others are, that we won't see the Xbox 720 (tentative name of course) for yet another 3-4 years.

Avatar image for get-ka12
get-ka12

1946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 get-ka12
Member since 2009 • 1946 Posts

[QUOTE="get-ka12"]Wonder what color the ring of death will be next gen. I predict 'blue.'vikingm03
and how do you know it will be a ring? I predict... a triangle of burgandy.

square of orange (hehe)

"I got the OSOD!!!" or BTOD (burgundy triangle of death)

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#26 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
The Xbox 360 launched in 2005, it's now 2009 (4 years) - if the next Xbox comes in 2011 that's 6 years, which is exactly where it needs to be to balance the generations. There's a year transition before the best games of the old system are over, and the new system starts releasing solid titles, so that puts us squarely in 2012 before most gamers "need" to make the jump. - I'm frankly fine with that - if we stay with the old hardware too long we're going to start seeing games become genre-locked. That happened (badly) during some of the longer eras, and we're starting to see it now with "FPS" being the de facto genre, or part-of (for hybrid games) coming to the table. When we hit the next generation, it will re-shake the genre wheel, and we'll see a nice rebalance from the sandbox / FPS focus.
Avatar image for radoman
radoman

297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 radoman
Member since 2008 • 297 Posts

I think we will definately get a reliable machine next time around. 1/3 failure rate and billion dollar warrany = lesson learned.

Avatar image for gago-gago
gago-gago

12138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 gago-gago
Member since 2009 • 12138 Posts

Sounds just about right. Since they came out first this gen they can take advantage of releasing a new console first again next gen.

Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

[QUOTE="Sgt_Hale"]

If Microsoft is indeed shifting developmet to their next gen console already... It would seem that they are quitting this gen a bit early again. Two years seems way too soon... Three years might be about right though.

Source Story.

mayceV

Can't wait to see how it looks, and this one willl probably be the one to last (9+ years). I'm not suprised, really. I just wonder how the cows will react when Sony doesn't push the PS4 until 2 years after XD

Question is, can Sony even afford to make the PS4 in 2-3 years? Highly doubt it, especially when they've now lost $5 Billion in their gaming division.

Anyway, by the time November 2011 or November 2012 comes about, it would be 6-7 years old by then. I think it's the right time to release a brand new console.:) Plus they won't stop supporting the 360, as MS makes more money off of each 360 system being sold & that more games are coming out for it.

Avatar image for pitty8982
pitty8982

1072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 pitty8982
Member since 2008 • 1072 Posts

august 2011 will be released the Nextbox

Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts
Two years does not seem to soon. Actually it feels just about right.
Avatar image for Kickinurass
Kickinurass

3357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Kickinurass
Member since 2005 • 3357 Posts

Two years feels just about right, though I'll probably wait a year or two anyway. I just bought this 360 and I'll be damned if I don't get the proper mileage.

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
Two years does not seem to soon. Actually it feels just about right.Couth_
This. If the new gen starts say 4 years from now that would be too far imo.
Avatar image for get-ka12
get-ka12

1946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 get-ka12
Member since 2009 • 1946 Posts

[QUOTE="Couth_"]Two years does not seem to soon. Actually it feels just about right.abuabed
This. If the new gen starts say 4 years from now that would be too far imo.

I don't know, in some ways, it feels like this gen has just started.

I mean, there have been good games this gen, but in a way, it kind of feels weak, like it hasn't fulfilled what it should do in order to be ready for another one.

Avatar image for Tauu
Tauu

825

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 Tauu
Member since 2005 • 825 Posts

Keep in mind that the consoles of this gen are just now matching the prices of last gen's consoles at launch. These are the prices that the mainstream can afford, so for many people this gen has just started. With all the complaints about console prices and the huge loss of money from Sony and Microsoft to get their hardware out to consumers, what makes you guys think they're in a hurry to start next gen? They'll wait until they're ready, when the technology to make new consoles is cheap enough. If the PS4 released now it would probably cost $900 to consumers, and Sony would probably lose $200 on every console sold. 2-4 gig of RAM, stronger CPU core, stronger GPU, faster motherboard, a more capable cooling system, bigger power supply, possibly motion controller and standard controller... consider the cost of the PS3 now plus all this stuff added to it. It wouldn't be cheap.

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts

[QUOTE="abuabed"][QUOTE="Couth_"]Two years does not seem to soon. Actually it feels just about right.get-ka12

This. If the new gen starts say 4 years from now that would be too far imo.

I don't know, in some ways, it feels like this gen has just started.

I mean, there have been good games this gen, but in a way, it kind of feels weak, like it hasn't fulfilled what it should do in order to be ready for another one.

Looking at the upcoming titles I think 2010 will be more than great, also this year has delivered a great amount of games so 2-3 years seems very fine to me.
Avatar image for ThatGuyFromB4
ThatGuyFromB4

697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 ThatGuyFromB4
Member since 2009 • 697 Posts

How is that too soon? Did you SEE the new Crytek 3 engine? Why would you NOT what that as soon as possible?

Avatar image for get-ka12
get-ka12

1946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 get-ka12
Member since 2009 • 1946 Posts

[QUOTE="get-ka12"]

[QUOTE="abuabed"] This. If the new gen starts say 4 years from now that would be too far imo.abuabed

I don't know, in some ways, it feels like this gen has just started.

I mean, there have been good games this gen, but in a way, it kind of feels weak, like it hasn't fulfilled what it should do in order to be ready for another one.

Looking at the upcoming titles I think 2010 will be more than great, also this year has delivered a great amount of games so 2-3 years seems very fine to me.

Yeah, I honestly think the lack of Final fantasy and the lack of good Zelda is getting to me.

Without those, it just doesn't feel 'complete.'

Avatar image for drakecool1
drakecool1

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 drakecool1
Member since 2009 • 1145 Posts

stop getting your hopes up there wont be a next gen companieds cant afford it with this crysis were having.

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts

@get-ka12

Yeah, I see your point. It is the same for me, no complete gen without a good FF game. In previous gen we used to play FF at launch but this gen...not very much.

Avatar image for mhsdrake
mhsdrake

3091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 mhsdrake
Member since 2007 • 3091 Posts
I think of the 3 current consoles, x360 will have the shortest lifespan, so Microsoft will probs be first to jump into the next gen pool. I think 3 years.
Avatar image for drakecool1
drakecool1

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 drakecool1
Member since 2009 • 1145 Posts

I think of the 3 current consoles, x360 will have the shortest lifespan, so Microsoft will probs be first to jump into the next gen pool. I think 3 years. mhsdrake

X360 has been having the shortest lifespan since this gen started lol rrod most don't even last 2 years but non joking around yeah I agree I do see microsoft folding their cards early like they did last gen I just feel sorry for lemmings who trusted.

Avatar image for mhsdrake
mhsdrake

3091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 mhsdrake
Member since 2007 • 3091 Posts

[QUOTE="mhsdrake"]I think of the 3 current consoles, x360 will have the shortest lifespan, so Microsoft will probs be first to jump into the next gen pool. I think 3 years. drakecool1

X360 has been having the shortest lifespan since this gen started lol rrod most don't even last 2 years but non joking around yeah I agree I do see microsoft folding their cards early like they did last gen I just feel sorry for lemmings who trusted.

I dont feel sorry for them, its a good console but it wont have the longevity of the others. Although it did come out a bit earlier so maybe there wont be much difference in the end. It just feels like the Ps3 hardware is still young and developing. I think this generation of gaming should last longer than previous gens with all the internet updates that they can make.
Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

[QUOTE="drakecool1"]

[QUOTE="mhsdrake"]I think of the 3 current consoles, x360 will have the shortest lifespan, so Microsoft will probs be first to jump into the next gen pool. I think 3 years. mhsdrake

X360 has been having the shortest lifespan since this gen started lol rrod most don't even last 2 years but non joking around yeah I agree I do see microsoft folding their cards early like they did last gen I just feel sorry for lemmings who trusted.

I dont feel sorry for them, its a good console but it wont have the longevity of the others. Although it did come out a bit earlier so maybe there wont be much difference in the end. It just feels like the Ps3 hardware is still young and developing. I think this generation of gaming should last longer than previous gens with all the internet updates that they can make.

They're not dropping support for the 360. Period. Why would they do that when it's making them money & more games are coming out for it? That would be very dumb.

Avatar image for Rikusaki
Rikusaki

16641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 Rikusaki
Member since 2006 • 16641 Posts

What? The Xbox 360 is going to be 4 years old in 11 days (which means it will have nearly outlived its predecessor) and it's still going strong. Two years from now, it will be going on 6 years, which is average for a console's lifespan. That's as long as the PS2 lasted before Sony brought out the PS3.

Besides, MS has already said that they are going to continue to support the Xbox 360 after its successor arrives so there's really nothing to be worried about.

The_Game21x
Just because a new console is released doesn't mean the previous one isn't supported anymore. Developers continue to make games for the PS2 and Sony is still supporting it.
Avatar image for mhsdrake
mhsdrake

3091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 mhsdrake
Member since 2007 • 3091 Posts
[QUOTE="garland51"]

[QUOTE="mhsdrake"][QUOTE="drakecool1"]

X360 has been having the shortest lifespan since this gen started lol rrod most don't even last 2 years but non joking around yeah I agree I do see microsoft folding their cards early like they did last gen I just feel sorry for lemmings who trusted.

I dont feel sorry for them, its a good console but it wont have the longevity of the others. Although it did come out a bit earlier so maybe there wont be much difference in the end. It just feels like the Ps3 hardware is still young and developing. I think this generation of gaming should last longer than previous gens with all the internet updates that they can make.

They're not dropping support for the 360. Period. Why would they do that when it's making them money & more games are coming out for it?

Yeah thats true. Although personally I dont like having a console when there is a newer one out. When ps3 game out I didnt touch ps2 again.
Avatar image for drakecool1
drakecool1

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 drakecool1
Member since 2009 • 1145 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

What? The Xbox 360 is going to be 4 years old in 11 days (which means it will have nearly outlived its predecessor) and it's still going strong. Two years from now, it will be going on 6 years, which is average for a console's lifespan. That's as long as the PS2 lasted before Sony brought out the PS3.

Besides, MS has already said that they are going to continue to support the Xbox 360 after its successor arrives so there's really nothing to be worried about.

Rikusaki

Just because a new console is released doesn't mean the previous one isn't supported anymore. Developers continue to make games for the PS2 and Sony is still supporting it.

yea but that's sont microsoft on the other hand is not known for supporting it's product.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts
Hey, why don't we look at Microsoft Games Studios' game hiring description from 2006-2007? http://web.archive.org/web/20070521050948/jobs.gamasutra.com/jobSeekerx/ViewAccountProfile.asp?accountno=266&CPID=2329&#Profile2329 "Microsoft Games Studios is looking for experienced game developers to work on next generation Xbox platform titles and Windows games for the first-party publishing team. Come join the publishing teams that worked on games such as Jade Empire, Fable, Conker, PGR3, Rise of Nations, Zoo Tycoon, Dungeon Siege, Vanguard, and RalliSport Challenge. Work with our top first-party development partners to help ship a great first-party line up for next generation Xbox platform." Let's compare that with this new one... http://jobs.gamasutra.com/jobseekerx/viewjobrss.asp?cjid=20066&accountno=266 "Microsoft Games Studios is looking for experienced game developers to work on next generation Xbox platform titles and Windows games for the first-party publishing team. Come join the publishing teams that worked on games such as Jade Empire, Fable, Conker, PGR3, Rise of Nations, Zoo Tycoon, Dungeon Siege, Vanguard, and RalliSport Challenge. Work with our top first-party development partners to help ship a great first-party line up for next generation Xbox platform." Yes, that's right... "Next generation Xbox platform" refers to Xbox 360. So.... yeah.
Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts

[QUOTE="abuabed"][QUOTE="Couth_"]Two years does not seem to soon. Actually it feels just about right.get-ka12

This. If the new gen starts say 4 years from now that would be too far imo.

I don't know, in some ways, it feels like this gen has just started.

I mean, there have been good games this gen, but in a way, it kind of feels weak, like it hasn't fulfilled what it should do in order to be ready for another one.

THAT'S the point I'm getting at. I agree with everyone that in terms of years it seems about right. But when you compare to past gens, we have not hardly gotten the same gaming mileage out of this gen 3-4 yrs in. It seems like devs are just now starting to get warmed up and we're talking about shifting to a new gen already! Think about the financial position so many developers are in already this gen... I just don't think it's time yet. I understand that MS, and the other console makers as well, just want to make $$$. But I think it's better for the industry as a whole to let devs make the most out of this gen before jumping to a new one.
Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

new console in 2012 is ok, by then 360 would have been out for like 7-8 years which is almost twice as long as original xbox life