New XBOX in 2-3 Years Confirmed???

  • 105 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts

The reason why it feels too soon is just because this has been an expensive generation, a lot of people put more money into this generation then any previous gens.

Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts

How is that too soon? Did you SEE the new Crytek 3 engine? Why would you NOT what that as soon as possible?

ThatGuyFromB4
Prolonging this gen only allows time for the tech to become even better.... and more affordable. So I expect to see even better.
Avatar image for Supafly1
Supafly1

4441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Supafly1
Member since 2003 • 4441 Posts
Are you really surprised by a new console for 2011 or 2012? I don't think they're "shifting development" either. The original Xbox wasn't profitable where's the 360 has been outta the black since early 2007. Trust, as long as there's a market, there will be support for the 360. I think the PS3 has shown that upgrading is a slow and long process.Shattered007
Releasing a new X-box while Sony hasn't planned a new one for another year or two will kick things out of balance for both MS, Sony and multiplatform developers.
Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

What? The Xbox 360 is going to be 4 years old in 11 days (which means it will have nearly outlived its predecessor) and it's still going strong. Two years from now, it will be going on 6 years, which is average for a console's lifespan. That's as long as the PS2 lasted before Sony brought out the PS3.

Besides, MS has already said that they are going to continue to support the Xbox 360 after its successor arrives so there's really nothing to be worried about.

Rikusaki
Just because a new console is released doesn't mean the previous one isn't supported anymore. Developers continue to make games for the PS2 and Sony is still supporting it.

And yet the xbox lost support as soon as the 360 was released. Microsoft's business model has not been like Sony's so far... it's more likely to assume they will drop 360 support than not. At least until there are any official announcements.
Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts

The reason why it feels too soon is just because this has been an expensive generation, a lot of people put more money into this generation then any previous gens.

spinecaton
That might be the case too... especially if you own more than one console! And yet I still feel like I got more gaming out of my ps2 & xbox!
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

@get-ka12

Yeah, I see your point. It is the same for me, no complete gen without a good FF game. In previous gen we used to play FF at launch but this gen...not very much.

abuabed
Blame Square Enix, not the console makers. Or it may well be gaming development in general. We ask so much from them, and companies like S-E have to top each of their previous iterations (and they now have 12 and change to top). It's probably straining their creative departments to the limits to avoid looking like a repeat.
Avatar image for Tjeremiah1988
Tjeremiah1988

16665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Tjeremiah1988
Member since 2003 • 16665 Posts
2009 confirms a new system is on its way.
Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 AdobeArtist
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

What? The Xbox 360 is going to be 4 years old in 11 days (which means it will have nearly outlived its predecessor) and it's still going strong. Two years from now, it will be going on 6 years, which is average for a console's lifespan. That's as long as the PS2 lasted before Sony brought out the PS3.

Besides, MS has already said that they are going to continue to support the Xbox 360 after its successor arrives so there's really nothing to be worried about.

Sgt_Hale

Just because a new console is released doesn't mean the previous one isn't supported anymore. Developers continue to make games for the PS2 and Sony is still supporting it.

And yet the xbox lost support as soon as the 360 was released. Microsoft's business model has not been like Sony's so far... it's more likely to assume they will drop 360 support than not. At least until there are any official announcements.

You clealy don't understand the differences between this generation and the last. Xbox 180 was doing very porrly in the market, was severly behind PS2 and only just ahead of Gamecube (not saying much since GC was also doing poorly). But this time around, 360 has a healthier market share, strong 3rd party support, and is actually making MS a profit.

They would not have the same reasons for dropping support like they did before. This gen DOES NOT equal the last gen, which is the premesis fo your flawed assumptions.

Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts

If Microsoft is indeed shifting developmet to their next gen console already... It would seem that they are quitting this gen a bit early again. Two years seems way too soon... Three years might be about right though.

Source Story.

Sgt_Hale

Quitting this gen early? The norm up until recently has been 5 years between consoles. The 360 came out in 2005 meaning it has not only outlived the first Xbox, but is also going to live longer than the "norm." Even IF a new Xbox comes out in 2011, that would mean a 6 year life for the 360 AND I think chances are good that MS would NOT kill the 360 the way they did the Xbox.

Frankly, I don't see new consoles starting to come out until 2012. I mean, we have only NOW hit the $299 "sweet spot" that console used to actually LAUNCH at.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="Sgt_Hale"][QUOTE="Rikusaki"] Just because a new console is released doesn't mean the previous one isn't supported anymore. Developers continue to make games for the PS2 and Sony is still supporting it.AdobeArtist

And yet the xbox lost support as soon as the 360 was released. Microsoft's business model has not been like Sony's so far... it's more likely to assume they will drop 360 support than not. At least until there are any official announcements.

You clealy don't understand the differences between this generation and the last. Xbox 180 was doing very porrly in the market, was severly behind PS2 and only just ahead of Gamecube (not saying much since GC was also doing poorly). But this time around, 360 has a healthier market share, strong 3rd party support, and is actually making MS a profit.

They would not have the same reasons for dropping support like they did before. This gen DOES NOT equal the last gen, which is the premesis fo your flawed assumptions.

Actually, there were two big reasons the Xbox was dropped like a bad habit. ONE, it was a money sink (not the case with the 360--each sale generates a profit). TWO, they ran out of XChips (the GPUs), and nVidia wasn't willing to make anymore (one reason Microsoft went to ATI and then bought the IP outright to ensure they'd have the ability to make more).
Avatar image for shutdown_202
shutdown_202

5649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 shutdown_202
Member since 2005 • 5649 Posts

New console in 2012. Cut off from life support in 2015.

Avatar image for johnny27
johnny27

4400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#62 johnny27
Member since 2006 • 4400 Posts
2012 q4 would be the earliest 2013 is much more likely
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45648 Posts

Look for it Nov. 2012 and that is just dandy with me. MMMMM, MM, can't wait to unpack and play the launch games on a spanking new console. :D

The end is near : Just heard there's one slight problem here. The system will indeed launch on November 21, 2012 but you'll only have to midnight to get all your gaming in before..... :twisted:

:lol:

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#64 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
Too soon? People seem to forget how long generations have lasted in the past. The 360 lasting 6-7 years would be fairly standard. Hell, the PS2 really only had 6 years as Sony's frontrunner console; from it's US release in 2001 to the launch of the PS3 in 2006.
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts

By that time, the 360 will be 6-7 years old...I think that's a healthy long lifespan for a console.

Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#66 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20499 Posts

If Microsoft is indeed shifting developmet to their next gen console already... It would seem that they are quitting this gen a bit early again. Two years seems way too soon... Three years might be about right though.

Source Story.

Sgt_Hale
Dear god another one? They just released one and developing another and now a next one? What could they possibly expand on?
Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#67 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

What? The Xbox 360 is going to be 4 years old in 11 days (which means it will have nearly outlived its predecessor) and it's still going strong. Two years from now, it will be going on 6 years, which is average for a console's lifespan. That's as long as the PS2 lasted before Sony brought out the PS3.

Besides, MS has already said that they are going to continue to support the Xbox 360 after its successor arrives so there's really nothing to be worried about.

Rikusaki

Just because a new console is released doesn't mean the previous one isn't supported anymore. Developers continue to make games for the PS2 and Sony is still supporting it.

I didn't say Sony dropped support for the PS2. What I did say is that it was on the market six years before its successor was released, which would be a fairly long lifespan for the Xbox 360 if this new Xbox rumor is correct.

And as for those saying MS will drop support for the 360 when the next Xbox is released, don't count on it. The main reason MS killed the Xbox early and stopped supporting it is because it wasn't profitable and had never been in the four years of its existence. The Xbox 360 on the other hand is profitable and MS has stated several times that the Xbox 360 will have a ten year lifespan meaning that they will continue to support it long after its successor is released.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#68 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="Sgt_Hale"]

If Microsoft is indeed shifting developmet to their next gen console already... It would seem that they are quitting this gen a bit early again. Two years seems way too soon... Three years might be about right though.

Source Story.

Zero_epyon
Dear god another one? They just released one and developing another and now a next one? What could they possibly expand on?

You consider 2005 recent then...?
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
[QUOTE="Sgt_Hale"]

If Microsoft is indeed shifting developmet to their next gen console already... It would seem that they are quitting this gen a bit early again. Two years seems way too soon... Three years might be about right though.

Source Story.

Zero_epyon
Dear god another one? They just released one and developing another and now a next one? What could they possibly expand on?

Four years ago falls under the 'just released' category? The hell is going on here?
Avatar image for gamer620
gamer620

3367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 gamer620
Member since 2004 • 3367 Posts

If Microsoft is indeed shifting developmet to their next gen console already... It would seem that they are quitting this gen a bit early again. Two years seems way too soon... Three years might be about right though.

Source Story.

Sgt_Hale

2012 would be 6 years for microsoft. Considering the original xbox only lasted like 4, this is an improvement.

Avatar image for Nike_Air
Nike_Air

19737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Nike_Air
Member since 2006 • 19737 Posts

I think the ps3 will be here in q4 2012 , and I doubt Microsoft will want to go head to head with it at potentially the same pricepoint.That one year head start for them is critical imo. 6 years between console releases seems like the perfect time anyway for consumers and developer ambitions to keep the industry from stagnating , so q4 2011 would be my best guess. It's have NATALstandard , blu-ray drive (faster) , and better graphics ..... it won't launch with a whole lot besides Forza 4 , butit'll get the sales lead and third party support lead on Sony's box once again and they'll drop some megaton releases when the ps3 hits in 2012. (Bungie's next for example).

There's no reason to stray from what worked so well for them. Why go from 2nd in marketshare this gento potentially 3rd place from day one next gen ? It's not very logical imo.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="abuabed"][QUOTE="get-ka12"]

I don't know, in some ways, it feels like this gen has just started.

I mean, there have been good games this gen, but in a way, it kind of feels weak, like it hasn't fulfilled what it should do in order to be ready for another one.

get-ka12

Looking at the upcoming titles I think 2010 will be more than great, also this year has delivered a great amount of games so 2-3 years seems very fine to me.

Yeah, I honestly think the lack of Final fantasy and the lack of good Zelda is getting to me.

Without those, it just doesn't feel 'complete.'

there has been a zelda,twighlight princess on the wii, there has also been a final fantasy this gen, final fantasy 11 was released on the 360, online only mind, but it's still a final fantasy game, be patient my friend, i am sure there will be another zelda on the wii, and you have FF13 to look foreward to
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
The average lifespan of a console before its successor is released is 5 years. So 2011 would be better than normal (although hopefully the 360 would still receive support). I'm ready for a new more powerful console now.
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"][QUOTE="Sgt_Hale"]

If Microsoft is indeed shifting developmet to their next gen console already... It would seem that they are quitting this gen a bit early again. Two years seems way too soon... Three years might be about right though.

Source Story.

Danm_999
Dear god another one? They just released one and developing another and now a next one? What could they possibly expand on?

You consider 2005 recent then...?

i expect to some people 4 years is 2 shakes of a lambs tale, 2012 sounds about right, if they leave it any later they will fall too far behind the PC
Avatar image for ultraking
ultraking

6904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 ultraking
Member since 2004 • 6904 Posts

whats wrong with the consoles that are out now? theres no need for new consoles anytime soon.. neither ps3 or 360 are anywhere close to being maxed out(well, the 360 is close:P)... i still think we wont see any new console till atleast 2013

Avatar image for CDWJUSTIN
CDWJUSTIN

2078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#76 CDWJUSTIN
Member since 2003 • 2078 Posts

great i could be the first not to buy this pos

Avatar image for monson21502
monson21502

8230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 monson21502
Member since 2009 • 8230 Posts

maybe. but i think they are working on gamesfor natal. there is 14 launch games you know. thats prolly why ms hasnt put out any new exclusives. they are making good money off each 360 sold. ied say they hang onto the 360 as long as they can. and only start next gen when sony does. which i guess will be 4-5 years

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#78 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

whats wrong with the consoles that are out now? theres no need for new consoles anytime soon.. neither ps3 or 360 are anywhere close to being maxed out(well, the 360 is close:P)... i still think we wont see any new console till atleast 2013

ultraking
I'm beginning to notice the aging in relation to PC games. Games like Empire Total War, Arma 2 and (of course) Crysis are really pulling the bar for high end graphics away. In another 2-3 years, I'm afraid it will become too noticeable not to change up.
Avatar image for lhughey
lhughey

4890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 lhughey
Member since 2006 • 4890 Posts
You guys act like they dont have more than 1 person working in the Xbox division. They can multi task (continue pushing the 360 while developing the NextBox).
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="ultraking"]

whats wrong with the consoles that are out now? theres no need for new consoles anytime soon.. neither ps3 or 360 are anywhere close to being maxed out(well, the 360 is close:P)... i still think we wont see any new console till atleast 2013

Danm_999
I'm beginning to notice the aging in relation to PC games. Games like Empire Total War, Arma 2 and (of course) Crysis are really pulling the bar for high end graphics away. In another 2-3 years, I'm afraid it will become too noticeable not to change up.

Hey, by 2012 prebuilt PCs out of Walmart will trounce the consoles, and will likely have some successor to Windows 7 on top of it.
Avatar image for XileLord
XileLord

3776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#81 XileLord
Member since 2007 • 3776 Posts

Xbox 360 was in planning before the original xbox was released and was in development about a year after, it doesn't mean microsoft has said "okay this generation is over we don't care anymore" it just means they have plans for the future and i bet they do have another xbox in the works and have for a very long time unless there idea of that is natal which in my opinion would be a epic failure. Even sony and nintendo have next generation consoles being worked on right now as we speak.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

a 2010 launch would be five years and a 2011 would be six, wheres the problem?

you realize that for games to be ready by either the 2010 or 2011 date they need to be in at least the design stage right now.

Avatar image for johnnyblazed88
johnnyblazed88

4240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 johnnyblazed88
Member since 2008 • 4240 Posts

Reach comes out late 2010 so they wont put out a new Halo till atleast 2012

Avatar image for furomaster_99
furomaster_99

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 furomaster_99
Member since 2009 • 737 Posts

Xbox 360 was in planning before the original xbox was released and was in development about a year after, it doesn't mean microsoft has said "okay this generation is over we don't care anymore" it just means they have plans for the future and i bet they do have another xbox in the works and have for a very long time unless there idea of that is natal which in my opinion would be a epic failure. Even sony and nintendo have next generation consoles being worked on right now as we speak.

XileLord

It seems they are going all chips in on natal; They want Nintendo's market share.

Avatar image for killerfist
killerfist

20155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#85 killerfist
Member since 2005 • 20155 Posts
Sounds about right to me.
Avatar image for tikki25x
tikki25x

1546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 tikki25x
Member since 2003 • 1546 Posts

[QUOTE="XileLord"]

Xbox 360 was in planning before the original xbox was released and was in development about a year after, it doesn't mean microsoft has said "okay this generation is over we don't care anymore" it just means they have plans for the future and i bet they do have another xbox in the works and have for a very long time unless there idea of that is natal which in my opinion would be a epic failure. Even sony and nintendo have next generation consoles being worked on right now as we speak.

furomaster_99

It seems they are going all chips in on natal; They want Nintendo's market share.

yeah i fully expect their next console to have Natal integrated from the start.

Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

[QUOTE="furomaster_99"]

[QUOTE="XileLord"]

Xbox 360 was in planning before the original xbox was released and was in development about a year after, it doesn't mean microsoft has said "okay this generation is over we don't care anymore" it just means they have plans for the future and i bet they do have another xbox in the works and have for a very long time unless there idea of that is natal which in my opinion would be a epic failure. Even sony and nintendo have next generation consoles being worked on right now as we speak.

tikki25x

It seems they are going all chips in on natal; They want Nintendo's market share.

yeah i fully expect their next console to have Natal integrated from the start.

Don't tell me that they're going to turn into the Wii with crap shovelware:(:cry:. They better have some backup in case something like that goes down, like keeping their next gen console more powerful. Also, they shouldn't forget their hardcore gamers either. A lot of them like myself don't want to stand up & kick, punch, throw, or whatever.

Avatar image for KodiakGTS
KodiakGTS

1262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#88 KodiakGTS
Member since 2003 • 1262 Posts
[QUOTE="garland51"]

[QUOTE="tikki25x"]

[QUOTE="furomaster_99"]It seems they are going all chips in on natal; They want Nintendo's market share.

yeah i fully expect their next console to have Natal integrated from the start.

Don't tell me that they're going to turn into the Wii with crap shovelware:(:cry:. They better have some backup in case something like that goes down, like keeping their next gen console more powerful. Also, they shouldn't forget their hardcore gamers either. A lot of them like myself don't want to stand up & kick, punch, throw, or whatever.

If I were MS, I would do the following: 1) Make my next console compatible with Natal, and backwards compatible with X360 games (software or hardware based emulation, doesn't matter) 2) Release said new console winter 2011 3) Keep making X360s bundled with Natal as a low end, HD, motion based system to cater to casuals (hopefully priced around $150 by that time) 4) Push the new console heavily for hardcore gamers
Avatar image for SpideR_CentS
SpideR_CentS

4766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#89 SpideR_CentS
Member since 2006 • 4766 Posts

I woun't buy a new console until at least 2012 (it feels weird just to type that lol). Only exception is I may buy a Wii again at some point.

Avatar image for SpideR_CentS
SpideR_CentS

4766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#90 SpideR_CentS
Member since 2006 • 4766 Posts

[QUOTE="tikki25x"]

[QUOTE="furomaster_99"]It seems they are going all chips in on natal; They want Nintendo's market share.

garland51

yeah i fully expect their next console to have Natal integrated from the start.

Don't tell me that they're going to turn into the Wii with crap shovelware:(:cry:. They better have some backup in case something like that goes down, like keeping their next gen console more powerful. Also, they shouldn't forget their hardcore gamers either. A lot of them like myself don't want to stand up & kick, punch, throw, or whatever.

M$ Knows their fans. I don't think they would forsake their established hardcore fans, just to try and pull more casuals. I think they will try to expand there fans (what biz wouldn't?!), but they know who they report to. The hardcore gamers are the people who buy an Xbox then buy 20-100 games over the consoles lifespan. That is the people they need the most, as those are the people who bring in the most money.

Avatar image for Meowmixxvi
Meowmixxvi

2243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#91 Meowmixxvi
Member since 2008 • 2243 Posts
i came late into the game. so this feels a bit too soon for me...
Avatar image for Netherscourge
Netherscourge

16364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#92 Netherscourge
Member since 2003 • 16364 Posts

I'm going back to Playstation Next-Next Gen.

I'm not dealing with cruddy Microsoft Hardware anymore.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#93 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

It would be 6 or 7 years after 360´s launch. Sounds perfect imo. Also im sure this time MS will keep supporting its older system.

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#94 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

wow how whould sony counter this when there loosing money with the ps3,any way i still go buy it if it cameout tommorow.

chessik101
are we sure they are still losing money. I mean i see standalone bluray players for 150 now and we know that the cell chips are at a smaller size now which means much cheaper to produce and better yields.
Avatar image for Classic24
Classic24

598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Classic24
Member since 2009 • 598 Posts

playstation 3 hardware is about breaking even now i believe, but they are definitely making money off software and the ps2 for sure, I predict the PS4 will cost at least 400 and tops 500 for a premium around 2012

Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts

I hope they don't. I have spent a lot of money on this console and I would be pretty mad if they came out with a new console.

Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#97 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20499 Posts
[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"][QUOTE="Sgt_Hale"]

If Microsoft is indeed shifting developmet to their next gen console already... It would seem that they are quitting this gen a bit early again. Two years seems way too soon... Three years might be about right though.

Source Story.

Danm_999
Dear god another one? They just released one and developing another and now a next one? What could they possibly expand on?

You consider 2005 recent then...?

Halo 3 2005 Halo ODST 2009 Halo Reach 2010 Halo 5 2011-12? See the pattern now?
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#98 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="Zero_epyon"] Dear god another one? They just released one and developing another and now a next one? What could they possibly expand on?Zero_epyon
You consider 2005 recent then...?

Halo 3 2005 Halo ODST 2009 Halo Reach 2010 Halo 5 2011-12? See the pattern now?

Halo 3 was 2007

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

Er, I don't know if anyone read my post but -- the "next generation Xbox" is referring to the "Xbox 360". It's an old tagline which has been under Microsoft Games Studios' hiring description since 2006.

There is absolutely no room for speculation based off of this "news".

This is probably a hiring announcement for Reach, if anything.

Avatar image for battalionwars13
battalionwars13

1264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#100 battalionwars13
Member since 2007 • 1264 Posts

Most likely a new Xbox in 2011, no idea about Nintendo or Sony.