Next year PS3 games will look better then 360

Microsoft made a wise decision launching first and avoiding the failure of going up against Sony & Nintendo. 360's early lead allowed the developers to get to grips with 360 architecture before the competition arrived thus making 360 games slighty supperior because PS3 and Wii were relatively new. Well actually developers didn't have trouble with the Wii because its essentially Gamcube achitecture with innovative controls. Sony creates awesome consoles for the long-term but they don't show their potential untill atleast a year after launch, I mean sure the games look great but throughout lifespan the games keep looking better & better, PS3 will be no exception.

It took 360 a year to churn out something like GeOW and still to this day, 7 months after release, no game has yet delivered something of GeOW level on the 360. This fall is when PS3 starts to gain control and show the world whats it made of. I never judge a console untill a year after it has released, I did this for the 360 (I was disappointed) and now I'm doing it for PS3.

I believe next year you will trully see a difference between PS3 and 360 games, maybe only slightly in graphics but definitely on physics, particle effects and lighting. Next year you will see the PS3 difference. oh wait I just read your mind, let me guess "just wait". You guys make it sound like Sony has never delivered when it comes to games, I guess turning 360 has made you blind against other consoles.

For now the difference between PS3 & 360 is minimal and the 360 had a year head start, from this fall onwards PS3 will look superior.

ya, you just WAIT for that,SpideR_CentS

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

Microsoft made a wise decision launching first and avoiding the failure of going up against Sony & Nintendo. 360's early lead allowed the developers to get to grips with 360 architecture before the competition arrived thus making 360 games slighty supperior because PS3 and Wii were relatively new. Well actually developers didn't have trouble with the Wii because its essentially Gamcube achitecture with innovative controls. Sony creates awesome consoles for the long-term but they don't show their potential untill atleast a year after launch, I mean sure the games look great but throughout lifespan the games keep looking better & better, PS3 will be no exception.

It took 360 a year to churn out something like GeOW and still to this day, 7 months after release, no game has yet delivered something of GeOW level on the 360. This fall is when PS3 starts to gain control and show the world whats it made of. I never judge a console untill a year after it has released, I did this for the 360 (I was disappointed) and now I'm doing it for PS3.

I believe next year you will trully see a difference between PS3 and 360 games, maybe only slightly in graphics but definitely on physics, particle effects and lighting. Next year you will see the PS3 difference. oh wait I just read your mind, let me guess "just wait". You guys make it sound like Sony has never delivered when it comes to games, I guess turning 360 has made you blind against other consoles.

For now the difference between PS3 & 360 is minimal and the 360 had a year head start, from this fall onwards PS3 will look superior.

Swift_Boss_A

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,gogeta242

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

Since when was Gears the only good game on the 360? Oh that's right, since you realized you had no real argument.

To sum it all up,

Just wait?

Why do i have to wait? when they already look better.Hopkins_J

Yep, Oblivion, Fight Night, Tiger Woods, Need For Speed, and NBA 2K7 all look better on PS3.

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,Vyse_The_Daring

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

Since when was Gears the only good game on the 360? Oh that's right, since you realized you had no real argument.

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,Vyse_The_Daring

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

Since when was Gears the only good game on the 360? Oh that's right, since you realized you had no real argument.

No, actually since the game industry said so. Oblivion and Graw were on PC, and Saints row? don't get me started. 360 wasn't all that good until Gears, don't try to say different because you know its true.

I agree man, PS3 is by far the better hardware, too bad people on theseforums go by ports to justify calling 360 more powerful. gogeta242

That really is a matter of opinon. Its not actually proven. I am a firm believer that the 360s hardware is just as superior as the PS3s.

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,Vyse_The_Daring

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

Since when was Gears the only good game on the 360? Oh that's right, since you realized you had no real argument.

yeah but its true though, untill GeOW 360 had nothing which shows off Microsofts new console. I mean sure the games before GeOW looked good but not awesome enough then when GeOW came out this showed 360 as a powerful console and the fact it was 360 exclusive made it even better.

Microsoft made a wise decision launching first and avoiding the failure of going up against Sony & Nintendo. 360's early lead allowed the developers to get to grips with 360 architecture before the competition arrived thus making 360 games slighty supperior because PS3 and Wii were relatively new. Well actually developers didn't have trouble with the Wii because its essentially Gamcube achitecture with innovative controls. Sony creates awesome consoles for the long-term but they don't show their potential untill atleast a year after launch, I mean sure the games look great but throughout lifespan the games keep looking better & better, PS3 will be no exception.

It took 360 a year to churn out something like GeOW and still to this day, 7 months after release, no game has yet delivered something of GeOW level on the 360. This fall is when PS3 starts to gain control and show the world whats it made of. I never judge a console untill a year after it has released, I did this for the 360 (I was disappointed) and now I'm doing it for PS3.

I believe next year you will trully see a difference between PS3 and 360 games, maybe only slightly in graphics but definitely on physics, particle effects and lighting. Next year you will see the PS3 difference. oh wait I just read your mind, let me guess "just wait". You guys make it sound like Sony has never delivered when it comes to games, I guess turning 360 has made you blind against other consoles.

For now the difference between PS3 & 360 is minimal and the 360 had a year head start, from this fall onwards PS3 will look superior.

Swift_Boss_A

All and I mean ALL consoles (not just Sony ones) improve over their lifespan when it comes to graphics, physics, AI, etc, etc... This undoubtably includes the 360 as well. :| And you get a big fat red X on your forehead if you say something like " But the 360 is already maxed out!!! It won't get much better!!" This is what the PS2 fanboys said when the original Xbox was released... and well... yeah. No truth to it whatsoever.

whatever helps you sleep at night. :D

lucky for me i win either way cause i own both consoles.

[QUOTE="Hopkins_J"]Why do i have to wait? when they already look better.gogeta242

Yep, Oblivion, Fight Night, Tiger Woods, Need For Speed, and NBA 2K7 all look better on PS3.

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]I agree man, PS3 is by far the better hardware, too bad people on theseforums go by ports to justify calling 360 more powerful. black_awpN1

That really is a matter of opinon. Its not actually proven. I am a firm believer that the 360s hardware is just as superior as the PS3s.

If so, why is it that a system thats hard to develop forand has hadlittle time with devs pumping out visuals comparable to a system thats super easy to develop for and had lots of time with devs.

[QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]I agree man, PS3 is by far the better hardware, too bad people on theseforums go by ports to justify calling 360 more powerful. gogeta242

That really is a matter of opinon. Its not actually proven. I am a firm believer that the 360s hardware is just as superior as the PS3s.

If so, why is it that a system thats hard to develop forand has hadlittle time with devs pumping out visuals comparable to a system thats super easy to develop for and had lots of time with devs.

Thats SONYs own damn fault for making it harder for Devs.

[QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"][QUOTE="gogeta242"]

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,gogeta242

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

Since when was Gears the only good game on the 360? Oh that's right, since you realized you had no real argument.

No, actually since the game industry said so. Oblivion and Graw were on PC, and Saints row? don't get me started. 360 wasn't all that good until Gears, don't try to say different because you know its true.

Too bad GRAW is a totally different game on the 360, you almost had something going there. Does Oblivion being on PC prevent it from being good on the 360? The game industry says no. Then you've got PGR3, Dead Rising, Saint's Row, CoD3, etc.

All and I mean ALL consoles (not just Sony ones) improve over their lifespan when it comes to graphics, physics, AI, etc, etc... This undoubtably includes the 360 as well. :| And you get a big fat red X on your forehead if you say something like " But the 360 is already maxed out!!! It won't get much better!!" This is what the PS2 fanboys said when the original Xbox was released... and well... yeah. No truth to it whatsoever. JakeT

true but PS3 games will indeed look superior, don't under-estimate the power of the Cell 8). Sony has always made consoles which are quite difficult to create videogames for in the beginning but when they are understood then it shows how powerful the console is, the same stands for PS3. 360's head start didn't exactly blow away the PS3, the games only look slightly superior if at all, Sony's first year of games line up looks way better the Microsofts first year and in 2008 I believe PS3 will show its superiority and beat the 360 in sales overall.

You have got to be kidding me. Are you still buying the crap. The Ps3 was supposed to run over the 360 with its True Next Gen 1080p graphics when in reality you where just sold a Blueray player. Nugtoka

Just like 360 owners were sold a DVD player?

You have got to be kidding me. Are you still buying the crap. The Ps3 was supposed to run over the 360 with its True Next Gen 1080p graphics when in reality you where just sold a Blueray player. Nugtoka

thats total bs

[QUOTE="gogeta242"][QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]I agree man, PS3 is by far the better hardware, too bad people on theseforums go by ports to justify calling 360 more powerful. black_awpN1

That really is a matter of opinon. Its not actually proven. I am a firm believer that the 360s hardware is just as superior as the PS3s.

If so, why is it that a system thats hard to develop forand has hadlittle time with devs pumping out visuals comparable to a system thats super easy to develop for and had lots of time with devs.

Thats SONYs own damn fault for making it harder for Devs.

That doesn't answer my question

[QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]I agree man, PS3 is by far the better hardware, too bad people on theseforums go by ports to justify calling 360 more powerful. gogeta242

That really is a matter of opinon. Its not actually proven. I am a firm believer that the 360s hardware is just as superior as the PS3s.

If so, why is it that a system thats hard to develop forand has hadlittle time with devs pumping out visuals comparable to a system thats super easy to develop for and had lots of time with devs.

bad excuse :roll: you should of said something else. not helping with the cause.

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,gogeta242

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

yay while we played cod2.oblivon,graw,saints row,dead rising, and bfme2

[QUOTE="gogeta242"][QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]I agree man, PS3 is by far the better hardware, too bad people on theseforums go by ports to justify calling 360 more powerful. istreakforfood

That really is a matter of opinon. Its not actually proven. I am a firm believer that the 360s hardware is just as superior as the PS3s.

If so, why is it that a system thats hard to develop forand has hadlittle time with devs pumping out visuals comparable to a system thats super easy to develop for and had lots of time with devs.

bad excuse :roll: you should of said something else. not helping with the cause.

No, actually its a valid excuse. You just don't want to hear it cause you know its true.

[QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]I agree man, PS3 is by far the better hardware, too bad people on theseforums go by ports to justify calling 360 more powerful. gogeta242

That really is a matter of opinon. Its not actually proven. I am a firm believer that the 360s hardware is just as superior as the PS3s.

If so, why is it that a system thats hard to develop forand has hadlittle time with devs pumping out visuals comparable to a system thats super easy to develop for and had lots of time with devs.

verry verry good point

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,soiguessialive

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

yay while we played cod2.oblivon,graw,saints row,dead rising, and bfme2

Just like PS gamers are and will be playing Resistance, Motorstorm, and Ninja Gaiden before fall comes.

Yep, i own both consoles too. Fell for sonys lies again (third time now). Now its here collecting dust, like the ps2 and psx were in there first year.

I am not trying to justify my buy like most of the Sony-Customers, with a blind "in a year ps3 will be better and faster than it is now." ... Believe me, it wont. Hope Sony bought something nice of my 600 euros :(

This was my last Sony system for sure. Actually 360 impressed more, even from start up. So, just wait before spinning such stupid stories like "in a year PS3 will be better" ..... you could place "I Hope .... " or "i think .... " before your sentence though. So everybody knows this is an opinion comming from a pretty clueless person who is pissed like i am about his ps3's poor performance.

Regards,

[QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"][QUOTE="gogeta242"]

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,springz300

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

Since when was Gears the only good game on the 360? Oh that's right, since you realized you had no real argument.

[QUOTE="gogeta242"][QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]I agree man, PS3 is by far the better hardware, too bad people on theseforums go by ports to justify calling 360 more powerful. legalize3

That really is a matter of opinon. Its not actually proven. I am a firm believer that the 360s hardware is just as superior as the PS3s.

If so, why is it that a system thats hard to develop forand has hadlittle time with devs pumping out visuals comparable to a system thats super easy to develop for and had lots of time with devs.

verry verry good point

thank you:)

gthd even though its a small demo type it looks better than any other racing game to date
planbfreak4eva

Yep, i own both consoles too. Fell for sonys lies again (third time now). Now its here collecting dust, like the ps2 and psx were in there first year.

I am not trying to justify my buy like most of the Sony-Customers, with a blind "in a year ps3 will be better and faster than it is now." ... Believe me, it wont. Hope Sony bought something nice of my 600 euros :(

This was my last Sony system for sure. Actually 360 impressed more, even from start up. So, just wait before spinning such stupid stories like "in a year PS3 will be better" ..... you could place "I Hope .... " or "i think .... " before your sentence though. So everybody knows this is an opinion comming from a pretty clueless person who is pissed like i am about his ps3's poor performance.

Regards,

klausklaus

PSN ID is?

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,soiguessialive

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

yay while we played cod2.oblivon,graw,saints row,dead rising, and bfme2

and while cows wait they play virtua fighter 5, oblivion, motorstorm,cod3,fight night round 3and resistance.

[QUOTE="istreakforfood"][QUOTE="gogeta242"][QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]I agree man, PS3 is by far the better hardware, too bad people on theseforums go by ports to justify calling 360 more powerful. gogeta242

That really is a matter of opinon. Its not actually proven. I am a firm believer that the 360s hardware is just as superior as the PS3s.

If so, why is it that a system thats hard to develop forand has hadlittle time with devs pumping out visuals comparable to a system thats super easy to develop for and had lots of time with devs.

bad excuse :roll: you should of said something else. not helping with the cause.

No, actually its a valid excuse. You just don't want to hear it cause you know its true.

No its actually not. Maybe the fact that the PS3 is flawed and dosent have superior hardware to the 360 is a reason why game look not as good as the 360 on it. Even when they untap teh cells power, I highly doubt were going to see anything leaps and bounds over the 360.

[QUOTE="legalize3"][QUOTE="gogeta242"][QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]I agree man, PS3 is by far the better hardware, too bad people on theseforums go by ports to justify calling 360 more powerful. gogeta242

That really is a matter of opinon. Its not actually proven. I am a firm believer that the 360s hardware is just as superior as the PS3s.

If so, why is it that a system thats hard to develop forand has hadlittle time with devs pumping out visuals comparable to a system thats super easy to develop for and had lots of time with devs.

verry verry good point

thank you:)

by the time developers get the hand of it.there will be another xbox

To sum it all up,

Just wait?

II-FBIsniper-II

Actually you are right tho..

it usually takes one year for a console to show wat its made of...


360 was utter crap until Gears (my opinion)...


ps2 was crap until MGS2


it just takes time.


except for N64 which had mario.. but it only launched with a meesly 2 games .. so yea..


springz300

because GRAW, Kameo, and Call of Duty 2 looked like crap :/

[QUOTE="planbfreak4eva"]gthd even though its a small demo type it looks better than any other racing game to date
lowe0

perhaps thats because its a conceptual demo?:roll:

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"]

To sum it all up,

Just wait?

horgen123

I think SONY should put up the infamous, "just wait" line on the PS3 boxs.

[QUOTE="gogeta242"][QUOTE="legalize3"][QUOTE="gogeta242"][QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]I agree man, PS3 is by far the better hardware, too bad people on theseforums go by ports to justify calling 360 more powerful. OldParr

That really is a matter of opinon. Its not actually proven. I am a firm believer that the 360s hardware is just as superior as the PS3s.

If so, why is it that a system thats hard to develop forand has hadlittle time with devs pumping out visuals comparable to a system thats super easy to develop for and had lots of time with devs.

verry verry good point

thank you:)

by the time developers get the hand of it.there will be another xbox

Well its keeping up with 360 visuals NOW, so I guess its good enough. I wouldn't be hoping for the new xbox to come so soon if I were you:?

No, actually its a valid excuse. You just don't want to hear it cause you know its true.

gogeta242

yea that must be it:roll:. sony has undelievered with the promises they made what the ps3 can do. so far it can barely run games 30fps instead of the 120fps they promised. most of what the tc said are wishful thinking on how the ps3 capabilities will improve over time and he believes it will without any valid proof and just going with his blind brand loyalty. we wont know that it will or may not. we just have to wait and see.