Next year PS3 games will look better then 360

I agree man, PS3 is by far the better hardware, too bad people on theseforums go by ports to justify calling 360 more powerful. gogeta242

No, it is because of the hardware that we are able to judge how powerful it really is gonna be. If the Cell was optimized for gaming, then the PS3 would be more powerful. As it stands now, no company, even first party, don't really know how to unlock that power yet. In the end, both systems will be amazing. No amount of physics or lighting will change the fact that the PS3 has nothing in terms of games, so far. Games make the system, not graphics and particle effects.

[QUOTE="gogeta242"][QUOTE="istreakforfood"][QUOTE="gogeta242"]

No, actually its a valid excuse. You just don't want to hear it cause you know its true.

istreakforfood

yea that must be it:roll:. sony has undelievered with the promises they made what the ps3 can do. so far it can barely run games 30fps instead of the 120fps they promised. most of what the tc said are wishful thinking on how the ps3 capabilities will improve over time and he believes it will without any valid proof and just going with his blind brand loyalty. we wont know that it will or may not. we just have to wait and see.

No, you're the one with wishful thinking talking as if PS3 has realized its full potential when its only been out 7 months. And who promised 120fps, someone said its possible, I don't remember it being promised. Seems you took Sony's word to heart way too much. You basically set yourself up for dissappointment.

well lets see.........the one who created the playstation 3...i dunno..ken kutaragi.

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6136786.html?tag=result;title;0

Owned.

Microsoft made a wise decision launching first and avoiding the failure of going up against Sony & Nintendo. 360's early lead allowed the developers to get to grips with 360 architecture before the competition arrived thus making 360 games slighty supperior because PS3 and Wii were relatively new. Well actually developers didn't have trouble with the Wii because its essentially Gamcube achitecture with innovative controls. Sony creates awesome consoles for the long-term but they don't show their potential untill atleast a year after launch, I mean sure the games look great but throughout lifespan the games keep looking better & better, PS3 will be no exception.

It took 360 a year to churn out something like GeOW and still to this day, 7 months after release, no game has yet delivered something of GeOW level on the 360. This fall is when PS3 starts to gain control and show the world whats it made of. I never judge a console untill a year after it has released, I did this for the 360 (I was disappointed) and now I'm doing it for PS3.

I believe next year you will trully see a difference between PS3 and 360 games, maybe only slightly in graphics but definitely on physics, particle effects and lighting. Next year you will see the PS3 difference. oh wait I just read your mind, let me guess "just wait". You guys make it sound like Sony has never delivered when it comes to games, I guess turning 360 has made you blind against other consoles.

For now the difference between PS3 & 360 is minimal and the 360 had a year head start, from this fall onwards PS3 will look superior.

Swift_Boss_A

[QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

[QUOTE="planbfreak4eva"]none of the games on 360 look better than ps3 when ps3 is hooked up with hdmi.....ps3 on sdtv loses to 360 but ps3 with hdmi wins over the 360Swift_Boss_A

You do realize there is a ELITE 360 with a HDMI port, dont you. So that comparison has failed.

pffft Elite 360, just another way for Microsoft to milk the fanbase. first they say HDMI doesn't matter but now they say it does. Just you wait, nextyear I'll bet they will get out another version of 360 but with a Blue-ray drive in it.

When are you guys gonna wake up and smell the coffee, MICROSOFT IS THE KING OF MILKAGE, I would go crazy with so much additional costs

Sony also said rumble wasnt needed, and lo and behold there coming out with a six axis with rumble.

[QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"][QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

[QUOTE="planbfreak4eva"]none of the games on 360 look better than ps3 when ps3 is hooked up with hdmi.....ps3 on sdtv loses to 360 but ps3 with hdmi wins over the 360black_awpN1

You do realize there is a ELITE 360 with a HDMI port, dont you. So that comparison has failed.

pffft Elite 360, just another way for Microsoft to milk the fanbase. first they say HDMI doesn't matter but now they say it does. Just you wait, nextyear I'll bet they will get out another version of 360 but with a Blue-ray drive in it.

When are you guys gonna wake up and smell the coffee, MICROSOFT IS THE KING OF MILKAGE, I would go crazy with so much additional costs

Sony also said rumble wasnt needed, and lo and behold there coming out with a six axis with rumble.

[QUOTE="black_awpN1"][QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"][QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

[QUOTE="planbfreak4eva"]none of the games on 360 look better than ps3 when ps3 is hooked up with hdmi.....ps3 on sdtv loses to 360 but ps3 with hdmi wins over the 360planbfreak4eva

You do realize there is a ELITE 360 with a HDMI port, dont you. So that comparison has failed.

pffft Elite 360, just another way for Microsoft to milk the fanbase. first they say HDMI doesn't matter but now they say it does. Just you wait, nextyear I'll bet they will get out another version of 360 but with a Blue-ray drive in it.

When are you guys gonna wake up and smell the coffee, MICROSOFT IS THE KING OF MILKAGE, I would go crazy with so much additional costs

Sony also said rumble wasnt needed, and lo and behold there coming out with a six axis with rumble.

OMG are you seroious. In a interview with Phil Harrison he even said that rumble wasnt a important next gen feature. Ask anyone here and theyll agree with me.

[QUOTE="planbfreak4eva"][QUOTE="black_awpN1"][QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"][QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

[QUOTE="planbfreak4eva"]none of the games on 360 look better than ps3 when ps3 is hooked up with hdmi.....ps3 on sdtv loses to 360 but ps3 with hdmi wins over the 360black_awpN1

You do realize there is a ELITE 360 with a HDMI port, dont you. So that comparison has failed.

pffft Elite 360, just another way for Microsoft to milk the fanbase. first they say HDMI doesn't matter but now they say it does. Just you wait, nextyear I'll bet they will get out another version of 360 but with a Blue-ray drive in it.

When are you guys gonna wake up and smell the coffee, MICROSOFT IS THE KING OF MILKAGE, I would go crazy with so much additional costs

Sony also said rumble wasnt needed, and lo and behold there coming out with a six axis with rumble.

OMG are you seroious. In a interview with Phil Harrison he even said that rumble wasnt a important next gen feature. Ask anyone here and theyll agree with me.

Microsoft made a wise decision launching first and avoiding the failure of going up against Sony & Nintendo. 360's early lead allowed the developers to get to grips with 360 architecture before the competition arrived thus making 360 games slighty supperior because PS3 and Wii were relatively new. Well actually developers didn't have trouble with the Wii because its essentially Gamcube achitecture with innovative controls. Sony creates awesome consoles for the long-term but they don't show their potential untill atleast a year after launch, I mean sure the games look great but throughout lifespan the games keep looking better & better, PS3 will be no exception.

It took 360 a year to churn out something like GeOW and still to this day, 7 months after release, no game has yet delivered something of GeOW level on the 360. This fall is when PS3 starts to gain control and show the world whats it made of. I never judge a console untill a year after it has released, I did this for the 360 (I was disappointed) and now I'm doing it for PS3.

I believe next year you will trully see a difference between PS3 and 360 games, maybe only slightly in graphics but definitely on physics, particle effects and lighting. Next year you will see the PS3 difference. oh wait I just read your mind, let me guess "just wait". You guys make it sound like Sony has never delivered when it comes to games, I guess turning 360 has made you blind against other consoles.

For now the difference between PS3 & 360 is minimal and the 360 had a year head start, from this fall onwards PS3 will look superior.

Swift_Boss_A

Mmmm , lets put that to the test , shall we ?

Intellivision kicked the Atari 2600 on day one with every game .

Sega genesis arrived and later topped on any game by SMW on the Snes on day one !

Playstation arrived and wiped away with graphics by SM64 on the N64 on day one !

PS2 was out and Gamecube raped everything on it it with Rogue squadron on day one !

Xbox topped it to no end with Halo on ........ day one !

Multiplats always looked better on the stronger hardware .

Now that the PS3 arrived all this has to be thrown away just because you have grown some horns , oh please !

he said it wasnt important....he didnt say its not needed
planbfreak4eva

What he meant to say was "we know we have had rumble since PS1 and it's gonna piss alot of people off that we don't have it now, but there is that whole lawsuit issue with Immersion".

Then somebody in Sony PR got the bright idea that they will tell everyone that you can't possibly have motion sensing AND rumble, that's crazy talk, all while they somehow fit motion sensing, rumble and a built in speaker to the wiimote.

The PS3 may look better next year, who knows?

Does it really matter?? Did it help Xbox win last gen?????????? Or even the Gamecube for that matter??

Both consoles had better graphics than PS2, it didn't stop the PS2 selling based on software.

Right now 360 has the software, and if sales continue the way they are, they will get more and more of it. Look at all the added support from Capcom, Namco and even a multiplat Square Enix game.

read this everybody

http://www.hardcoreware.net/reviews/review-348-1.htm

Microsoft made a wise decision launching first and avoiding the failure of going up against Sony & Nintendo. 360's early lead allowed the developers to get to grips with 360 architecture before the competition arrived thus making 360 games slighty supperior because PS3 and Wii were relatively new. Well actually developers didn't have trouble with the Wii because its essentially Gamcube achitecture with innovative controls. Sony creates awesome consoles for the long-term but they don't show their potential untill atleast a year after launch, I mean sure the games look great but throughout lifespan the games keep looking better & better, PS3 will be no exception.

It took 360 a year to churn out something like GeOW and still to this day, 7 months after release, no game has yet delivered something of GeOW level on the 360. This fall is when PS3 starts to gain control and show the world whats it made of. I never judge a console untill a year after it has released, I did this for the 360 (I was disappointed) and now I'm doing it for PS3.

I believe next year you will trully see a difference between PS3 and 360 games, maybe only slightly in graphics but definitely on physics, particle effects and lighting. Next year you will see the PS3 difference. oh wait I just read your mind, let me guess "just wait". You guys make it sound like Sony has never delivered when it comes to games, I guess turning 360 has made you blind against other consoles.

For now the difference between PS3 & 360 is minimal and the 360 had a year head start, from this fall onwards PS3 will look superior.

Swift_Boss_A

Ever heard of cautious optimism?...

Next year PC games will look better than PS3 and 360 games

7600gt FTW for ps3 owners...the console has limitations, its never going to beat pc, neither is 360

[QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"]

Microsoft made a wise decision launching first and avoiding the failure of going up against Sony & Nintendo. 360's early lead allowed the developers to get to grips with 360 architecture before the competition arrived thus making 360 games slighty supperior because PS3 and Wii were relatively new. Well actually developers didn't have trouble with the Wii because its essentially Gamcube achitecture with innovative controls. Sony creates awesome consoles for the long-term but they don't show their potential untill atleast a year after launch, I mean sure the games look great but throughout lifespan the games keep looking better & better, PS3 will be no exception.

It took 360 a year to churn out something like GeOW and still to this day, 7 months after release, no game has yet delivered something of GeOW level on the 360. This fall is when PS3 starts to gain control and show the world whats it made of. I never judge a console untill a year after it has released, I did this for the 360 (I was disappointed) and now I'm doing it for PS3.

I believe next year you will trully see a difference between PS3 and 360 games, maybe only slightly in graphics but definitely on physics, particle effects and lighting. Next year you will see the PS3 difference. oh wait I just read your mind, let me guess "just wait". You guys make it sound like Sony has never delivered when it comes to games, I guess turning 360 has made you blind against other consoles.

For now the difference between PS3 & 360 is minimal and the 360 had a year head start, from this fall onwards PS3 will look superior.

Caseytappy

Mmmm , lets put that to the test , shall we ?

Intellivision kicked the Atari 2600 on day one with every game .

Sega genesis arrived and later topped on any game by SMW on the Snes on day one !

Playstation arrived and wiped away with graphics by SM64 on the N64 on day one !

PS2 was out and Gamecube raped everything on it it with Rogue squadron on day one !

Xbox topped it to no end with Halo on ........ day one !

Multiplats always looked better on the stronger hardware .

Now that the PS3 arrived all this has to be thrown away just because you have grown some horns , oh please !

cows wont reply to that because you have just owned every single one of them. if the PS3 was as powerful as sony said then it would be kicking the 360s ass from day 1. Face it cows Sony lied to you now here's a tissue to go and wipe up the tears.

The PS3 may look better next year, who knows?

Does it really matter?? Did it help Xbox win last gen?????????? Or even the Gamecube for that matter??

Both consoles had better graphics than PS2, it didn't stop the PS2 selling based on software.

Right now 360 has the software, and if sales continue the way they are, they will get more and more of it. Look at all the added support from Capcom, Namco and even a multiplat Square Enix game.

_koolgirl_

True Story

if a game system won on graphics alone than xbox was the champ

but they win on games and right now 360 got them and will have more of them this gen

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,gogeta242

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

and cows are sill WAITING for anything..... :shock:

[QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"][QUOTE="gogeta242"]

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,gogeta242

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

Since when was Gears the only good game on the 360? Oh that's right, since you realized you had no real argument.

No, actually since the game industry said so. Oblivion and Graw were on PC, and Saints row? don't get me started. 360 wasn't all that good until Gears, don't try to say different because you know its true.

G.R.A.W. on the 360 was not the same as G.R.A.W. for the PC. And there were plenty of other great games on the 360 before then. Nothing Gears calibur but who cares? Are those the only games you play?

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,Magical_Zebra

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

and cows are sill WAITING for anything..... :shock:

seriously tho that's a lot of waiting

[QUOTE="gogeta242"]

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,Magical_Zebra

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

and cows are sill WAITING for anything..... :shock:

its just like casey said. if cows want to continue saying it took the 360 a year to get a great game..they would have to admit that the ps3 DOESN'T have any great games right now..

[QUOTE="Hopkins_J"]Why do i have to wait? when they already look better.gogeta242

Yep, Oblivion, Fight Night, Tiger Woods, Need For Speed, and NBA 2K7 all look better on PS3.

[QUOTE="Caseytappy"][QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"]

Microsoft made a wise decision launching first and avoiding the failure of going up against Sony & Nintendo. 360's early lead allowed the developers to get to grips with 360 architecture before the competition arrived thus making 360 games slighty supperior because PS3 and Wii were relatively new. Well actually developers didn't have trouble with the Wii because its essentially Gamcube achitecture with innovative controls. Sony creates awesome consoles for the long-term but they don't show their potential untill atleast a year after launch, I mean sure the games look great but throughout lifespan the games keep looking better & better, PS3 will be no exception.

It took 360 a year to churn out something like GeOW and still to this day, 7 months after release, no game has yet delivered something of GeOW level on the 360. This fall is when PS3 starts to gain control and show the world whats it made of. I never judge a console untill a year after it has released, I did this for the 360 (I was disappointed) and now I'm doing it for PS3.

I believe next year you will trully see a difference between PS3 and 360 games, maybe only slightly in graphics but definitely on physics, particle effects and lighting. Next year you will see the PS3 difference. oh wait I just read your mind, let me guess "just wait". You guys make it sound like Sony has never delivered when it comes to games, I guess turning 360 has made you blind against other consoles.

For now the difference between PS3 & 360 is minimal and the 360 had a year head start, from this fall onwards PS3 will look superior.

Thebettertwin

Mmmm , lets put that to the test , shall we ?

Intellivision kicked the Atari 2600 on day one with every game .

Sega genesis arrived and later topped on any game by SMW on the Snes on day one !

Playstation arrived and wiped away with graphics by SM64 on the N64 on day one !

PS2 was out and Gamecube raped everything on it it with Rogue squadron on day one !

Xbox topped it to no end with Halo on ........ day one !

Multiplats always looked better on the stronger hardware .

Now that the PS3 arrived all this has to be thrown away just because you have grown some horns , oh please !

cows wont reply to that because you have just owned every single one of them. if the PS3 was as powerful as sony said then it would be kicking the 360s ass from day 1. Face it cows Sony lied to you now here's a tissue to go and wipe up the tears.

:lol: you guys, you guys with your cows this and cows that. seriously :| your argument doesn't become any stronger if you call someone a cow.

The Playstations have always perfomed well in the long term, PS1 was hard at first but developers got used it, PS2 was at at first and developers got used to it. The same will happen and is happing with PS3. Compare 360's first year of games with PS3's first year, this fall PS3 will have awesome exclusives like Ratchet & Clank future, Heavenly sword, MGS4, Sigma, Lair, Uncharted, Warhawk etc etc. 360 has been out for over a year and yet mostly all of PS3's games are graphically compareable to 360's, I see the head start only helped in sales. 360 is already dead in Japan and dieing in Europe. PS3 will out perform 360 in the long term starting from this fall.

did developers max out the ps2's power within a year? no..did developers max out the xbox's power within a year? no...so why on earth are cows coming up with this bs idea that the 360 has already reached its limit with gears of war?lawlessx

First it was Gears of War, now it's Mass Effect. Get with the times man.

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,gogeta242

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

FTW, pleanty of graphically good games prior to gears.

[QUOTE="lawlessx"]did developers max out the ps2's power within a year? no..did developers max out the xbox's power within a year? no...so why on earth are cows coming up with this bs idea that the 360 has already reached its limit with gears of war?TyrantDragon55

First it was Gears of War, now it's Mass Effect. Get with the times man.

now mass effect is the target? when did this happen?

[QUOTE="TyrantDragon55"]

[QUOTE="lawlessx"]did developers max out the ps2's power within a year? no..did developers max out the xbox's power within a year? no...so why on earth are cows coming up with this bs idea that the 360 has already reached its limit with gears of war?lawlessx

First it was Gears of War, now it's Mass Effect. Get with the times man.

now mass effect is the target? when did this happen?

Mass Effect looks better than Gears, so it's only natural.

[QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"][QUOTE="gogeta242"]

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,gogeta242

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

Since when was Gears the only good game on the 360? Oh that's right, since you realized you had no real argument.

No, actually since the game industry said so. Oblivion and Graw were on PC, and Saints row? don't get me started. 360 wasn't all that good until Gears, don't try to say different because you know its true.

so because Oblivion and Graw were on the PC i didnt enjoy them? last i checked i dont have a gaming PC and my guess is u dont either, so who cares if their multiplat, just cause i cant use them for ownage doesnt mean i wasnt playing them

[QUOTE="Lance_C"][QUOTE="Hopkins_J"]Why do i have to wait? when they already look better.gogeta242

I can't believe you are buying that:? I compared PS3 and 360 version of Def Jam Icon, and they look the same. I just had to turn down the brightness for the PS3 version. This comparison is much better dude. http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=75856

:lol: ur owned and to hide it u go to another game website, again, as its been repeated a million times, GAMESPOT is used here its SW rules, sorry u lose, and no consolation prize either

[QUOTE="Hopkins_J"]Why do i have to wait? when they already look better.gogeta242

Yep, Oblivion, Fight Night, Tiger Woods, Need For Speed, and NBA 2K7 all look better on PS3.

You're kidding me right?! Gamespot already claimed your 'facts' false. All of these games look better on the Xbox 360 except Oblivion (right now anyways). Oblivion is getting patched anyways to look as good as the PS3 version.

Microsoft made a wise decision launching first and avoiding the failure of going up against Sony & Nintendo. 360's early lead allowed the developers to get to grips with 360 architecture before the competition arrived thus making 360 games slighty supperior because PS3 and Wii were relatively new. Well actually developers didn't have trouble with the Wii because its essentially Gamcube achitecture with innovative controls. Sony creates awesome consoles for the long-term but they don't show their potential untill atleast a year after launch, I mean sure the games look great but throughout lifespan the games keep looking better & better, PS3 will be no exception.

It took 360 a year to churn out something like GeOW and still to this day, 7 months after release, no game has yet delivered something of GeOW level on the 360. This fall is when PS3 starts to gain control and show the world whats it made of. I never judge a console untill a year after it has released, I did this for the 360 (I was disappointed) and now I'm doing it for PS3.

I believe next year you will trully see a difference between PS3 and 360 games, maybe only slightly in graphics but definitely on physics, particle effects and lighting. Next year you will see the PS3 difference. oh wait I just read your mind, let me guess "just wait". You guys make it sound like Sony has never delivered when it comes to games, I guess turning 360 has made you blind against other consoles.

For now the difference between PS3 & 360 is minimal and the 360 had a year head start, from this fall onwards PS3 will look superior.

Swift_Boss_A

next year....then next year year will come around and PS3 will still not look better...then you will say next year again

I keep reading the same words over and over "Just wait" can't we bundle all these topics into one, there all long posts but at the end of the day tehre message is exactly the same "just wait" and i don't even know what i'm supposed to be waiting for, i like my 360 i enjoy playing the games -now- why am i waiting?

God i'm so confused!

[QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"][QUOTE="gogeta242"]

[QUOTE="SpideR_CentS"]ya, you just WAIT for that,Swift_Boss_A

Just like Lemmings WAITED for Gears.

Since when was Gears the only good game on the 360? Oh that's right, since you realized you had no real argument.

yeah but its true though, untill GeOW 360 had nothing which shows off Microsofts new console. I mean sure the games before GeOW looked good but not awesome enough then when GeOW came out this showed 360 as a powerful console and the fact it was 360 exclusive made it even better.

I thought PGR3, Condemned, Kameo, and Dead Rising were all pretty damn good looking.....they easily shown what the 360 was capable of.

OMG, read this and quit arguing

http://www.hardcoreware.net/reviews/review-348-1.htm

The Playstations have always perfomed well in the long term

Swift_Boss_A

this is good to

http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/games/archives/2006/12/07/ps3_vs_xbox_360_a_developer_speaks.html

Microsoft made a wise decision launching first and avoiding the failure of going up against Sony & Nintendo. 360's early lead allowed the developers to get to grips with 360 architecture before the competition arrived thus making 360 games slighty supperior because PS3 and Wii were relatively new. Well actually developers didn't have trouble with the Wii because its essentially Gamcube achitecture with innovative controls. Sony creates awesome consoles for the long-term but they don't show their potential untill atleast a year after launch, I mean sure the games look great but throughout lifespan the games keep looking better & better, PS3 will be no exception.

It took 360 a year to churn out something like GeOW and still to this day, 7 months after release, no game has yet delivered something of GeOW level on the 360. This fall is when PS3 starts to gain control and show the world whats it made of. I never judge a console untill a year after it has released, I did this for the 360 (I was disappointed) and now I'm doing it for PS3.

I believe next year you will trully see a difference between PS3 and 360 games, maybe only slightly in graphics but definitely on physics, particle effects and lighting. Next year you will see the PS3 difference. oh wait I just read your mind, let me guess "just wait". You guys make it sound like Sony has never delivered when it comes to games, I guess turning 360 has made you blind against other consoles.

For now the difference between PS3 & 360 is minimal and the 360 had a year head start, from this fall onwards PS3 will look superior.

Swift_Boss_A

this is a smart post TC, however, logic just doesn't exist in SW. sad.