Nintendo =BEST DEVELOPERs ON THE PLANET AAAE EDITION

  • 153 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#51 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
wiisports and wiifit are first party too.. the wiimote is first party and the ds is first party.. zelda: PH has great innovative controls , and so have wii sports.i think you are the one playing modernised games mainly while you accuse nintendo of doing the same. fans ask fore these games.Voice over isn't required at all... why?. you have somne strange standards.. story is of NO importance in games and are usually very unoriginal (save the world/ defeat the enemy). The only thing i dislike about the wii are the graphics.. i'd like them to be up to par with 360 or ps3.. but gameplay is fine.Always-Honest
Again, you failed to address my post. You seem to be stuck on this idea that innovation = modernization, and it doesn't. Its even debateable if the wiimote is innovate. As far as modernization goes, that includes higher production values, voice acting, storytelling, etc. The whole concept of modernization is to bring the games into the modern era. You can't do that when you're dealing with time old concepts. Voice acting is quentesential to the modern game. All of Nintendo's major first party titles are stuck in the past. You can only play Zelda and Mario so many times.
Avatar image for Marth6781
Marth6781

2564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Marth6781
Member since 2007 • 2564 Posts
I wonder...if they are the best (don't get me wrong, I think they are top 3 devs)...why can't they make ANY new sucessful IPs. Nintendogs was one I suppose...but that's a gimmick game.dkhw
Metroid prime? Pikmin? Diaster(potential) Advance wars? Batallion wars? etc.
Avatar image for BubbyJello
BubbyJello

2750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 BubbyJello
Member since 2007 • 2750 Posts

I stopped reading when I saw this:

wii

Storm_Marine

Because it turned you on?

Avatar image for dkhw
dkhw

4045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#54 dkhw
Member since 2006 • 4045 Posts

[QUOTE="dkhw"]I wonder...if they are the best (don't get me wrong, I think they are top 3 devs)...why can't they make ANY new sucessful IPs. Nintendogs was one I suppose...but that's a gimmick game.Marth6781
Metroid prime? Pikmin? Diaster(potential) Advance wars? Batallion wars? etc.

Those aren't new. Pikmin was okay, but I haven't seen much new things this gen from Nintendo. The sequels have been amazing, but I think it's time for Nintendo to try something new like Insomniac has done, going to FPS.

Avatar image for Marth6781
Marth6781

2564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Marth6781
Member since 2007 • 2564 Posts
[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]wiisports and wiifit are first party too.. the wiimote is first party and the ds is first party.. zelda: PH has great innovative controls , and so have wii sports.i think you are the one playing modernised games mainly while you accuse nintendo of doing the same. fans ask fore these games.Voice over isn't required at all... why?. you have somne strange standards.. story is of NO importance in games and are usually very unoriginal (save the world/ defeat the enemy). The only thing i dislike about the wii are the graphics.. i'd like them to be up to par with 360 or ps3.. but gameplay is fine.Vandalvideo
Again, you failed to address my post. You seem to be stuck on this idea that innovation = modernization, and it doesn't. Its even debateable if the wiimote is innovate. As far as modernization goes, that includes higher production values, voice acting, storytelling, etc. The whole concept of modernization is to bring the games into the modern era. You can't do that when you're dealing with time old concepts. Voice acting is quentesential to the modern game. All of Nintendo's major first party titles are stuck in the past. You can only play Zelda and Mario so many times.

:roll: like you dont play sequels. Whats funny is everytime releases a big name game somehow that genre is either pushed foward or people imitate. And untill I play a game that covers as many issues or has a better story than "the giver" an 8th grade book; story isn't important.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#56 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Marth6781"] :roll: like you dont play sequels. Whats funny is everytime releases a big name game somehow that genre is either pushed foward or people imitate. And untill I play a game that covers as many issues or has a better story than "the giver" an 8th grade book; story isn't important.

Story is extremely important. I play sequals all the time, heck I ended up buying the new Zelda, Mario, and Metroid games. Even with the waggle, I couldn't shake the feelings that I was still playing Ocarina of Time and the older itterations of the other games. Thats a serious problem that NEEDS to be addressed. You can only play the same old game so many times before it gets boring. They need to modernize their games. IF tthey're going to attempt a story, it better have VO and good storytelling.
Avatar image for dkhw
dkhw

4045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#57 dkhw
Member since 2006 • 4045 Posts

[QUOTE="Marth6781"] :roll: like you dont play sequels. Whats funny is everytime releases a big name game somehow that genre is either pushed foward or people imitate. And untill I play a game that covers as many issues or has a better story than "the giver" an 8th grade book; story isn't important.Vandalvideo
Story is extremely important. I play sequals all the time, heck I ended up buying the new Zelda, Mario, and Metroid games. Even with the waggle, I couldn't shake the feelings that I was still playing Ocarina of Time and the older itterations of the other games. Thats a serious problem that NEEDS to be addressed. You can only play the same old game so many times before it gets boring. They need to modernize their games. IF tthey're going to attempt a story, it better have VO and good storytelling.

I have to agree. Gaming is about the whole experience. Presentation. Sound. Graphics. Story. Multiplayer for shooters (Metroid Prime). To say that controller innovation = entire gaming experience is pure ignorance.

Avatar image for Kickinurass
Kickinurass

3357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Kickinurass
Member since 2005 • 3357 Posts

I'd have to say Blizzard is a better developer than Nintendo, simply for the fact of consistency. Whereas Nintendo games tend be loved by some hated by others, Blizzard games are generally loved by the masses. And I happen to dislike PC gaming... take from that what you will - It's only my opinion.

Avatar image for Marth6781
Marth6781

2564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Marth6781
Member since 2007 • 2564 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Marth6781"] :roll: like you dont play sequels. Whats funny is everytime releases a big name game somehow that genre is either pushed foward or people imitate. And untill I play a game that covers as many issues or has a better story than "the giver" an 8th grade book; story isn't important.

Story is extremely important. I play sequals all the time, heck I ended up buying the new Zelda, Mario, and Metroid games. Even with the waggle, I couldn't shake the feelings that I was still playing Ocarina of Time and the older itterations of the other games. Thats a serious problem that NEEDS to be addressed. You can only play the same old game so many times before it gets boring. They need to modernize their games. IF tthey're going to attempt a story, it better have VO and good storytelling.

Each of those games were fresh and amazing. See how opinions differ? I love how people bash nintendo, yet fail to bash all these "same" yearly shooters. Oh yea find that game with a better story than "the giver."
Avatar image for Marth6781
Marth6781

2564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Marth6781
Member since 2007 • 2564 Posts

I'd have to say Blizzard is a better developer than Nintendo, simply for the fact of consistency. Whereas Nintendo games tend be loved by some hated by others, Blizzard games are generally loved by the masses. And I happen to dislike PC gaming... take from that what you will - It's only my opinion.

Kickinurass
Nintendo games aren't loved by the masses? Have you seen gamerankings?
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#61 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Marth6781"] Each of those games were fresh and amazing. See how opinions differ? I love how people bash nintendo, yet fail to bash all these "same" yearly shooters. Oh yea find that game with a better story than "the giver."

Or heres another perspective. Each of those games were too similar to their predcessors and failed to bring the franchises into the modern era. You can't just shake off the fact that Nintendo games have horribly cliche and whimsical stories, "Just because they're Nintendo". If NIntendo is truly "one of the best developers on the planet" you better be prepared to hold them to the same standards as everyone else. If they attempt something, and that something is bad, you BETTER mark them down for that. SOrry for holding NIntendo to higher standards than you guys, but I'm trying to be fair. they attempted stories, and those stories were CRAP. Thus I mark them down for something they failed on.
Avatar image for Kickinurass
Kickinurass

3357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Kickinurass
Member since 2005 • 3357 Posts

[QUOTE="Kickinurass"]

I'd have to say Blizzard is a better developer than Nintendo, simply for the fact of consistency. Whereas Nintendo games tend be loved by some hated by others, Blizzard games are generally loved by the masses. And I happen to dislike PC gaming... take from that what you will - It's only my opinion.

Marth6781

Nintendo games aren't loved by the masses? Have you seen gamerankings?

Of course they are. I'm biting my fingers waiting for tomorrow to get here so I can go pick up my copy of Brawl. I never said Nintendo games weren't loved and adored, just that some love them and others hate them. Nintendo is a great developer; I just feel that Blizzard produces better and more critically acclaimed games. And lastly, I also said it was merely my opinion.

Avatar image for Marth6781
Marth6781

2564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Marth6781
Member since 2007 • 2564 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Marth6781"] Each of those games were fresh and amazing. See how opinions differ? I love how people bash nintendo, yet fail to bash all these "same" yearly shooters. Oh yea find that game with a better story than "the giver."

Or heres another perspective. Each of those games were too similar to their predcessors and failed to bring the franchises into the modern era. You can't just shake off the fact that Nintendo games have horribly cliche and whimsical stories, "Just because they're Nintendo". If NIntendo is truly "one of the best developers on the planet" you better be prepared to hold them to the same standards as everyone else. If they attempt something, and that something is bad, you BETTER mark them down for that. SOrry for holding NIntendo to higher standards than you guys, but I'm trying to be fair. they attempted stories, and those stories were CRAP. Thus I mark them down for something they failed on.

Metroid prime isnt modern? Zelda isnt modern? Mario isnt modern? Its funny how games try to imitate those 3 in their respective genre's yet fail. So if those games are old what does it say about the others? You rant on about presentation yet fail to realize story is only ONE PART. You want a "deep" story read a book, most devs agree to btw. No games today have stories that rival books. Anyways im stiil waiting on my "giver" challenge.
Avatar image for Nwebrme
Nwebrme

108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Nwebrme
Member since 2007 • 108 Posts
Yeah, the WarioWare pic totally made me grin :D.
Avatar image for Donkey_Puncher
Donkey_Puncher

5083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Donkey_Puncher
Member since 2005 • 5083 Posts
Personally I prefer Blizzard and Valve. I couldn't name a bad game they've made, where I can do a ton of that with Nintendo.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#66 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Marth6781"] Metroid prime isnt modern? Zelda isnt modern? Mario isnt modern? Its funny how games try to imitate those 3 in their respective genre's yet fail. So if those games are old what does it say about the others? You rant on about presentation yet fail to realize story is only ONE PART. You want a "deep" story read a book, most devs agree to btw. No games today have stories that rival books. Anyways im stiil waiting on my "giver" challenge.

Zelda and Mario are most certainly not modern. They don't even have voice acting! The games are stuck in the past and relying on the gameplay mechanics of their predcessors. I like this lame cop out of "if you want a good story, read a book". Thats no excuse for Nintendo attempting a story and failing miserably. Like I said in my previous post, you better be prepared to hold Nintendo to the same standards as every other developer. IF they attempt something, and that something is crap, you BETTER down rank them for that. Nintendo attempted stories with zelda and mario, and those stories were crap. They deserve criticism for that. Oh and MISCONCEPTION! Two amazing stories belong to video games; Suikoden (Based off of the chinese mythos of Water Margin) and Silent Hill (Based off of the happenings of a real town in Pennsylvania).
Avatar image for samusarmada
samusarmada

5816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#67 samusarmada
Member since 2005 • 5816 Posts

[QUOTE="Marth6781"] Metroid prime isnt modern? Zelda isnt modern? Mario isnt modern? Its funny how games try to imitate those 3 in their respective genre's yet fail. So if those games are old what does it say about the others? You rant on about presentation yet fail to realize story is only ONE PART. You want a "deep" story read a book, most devs agree to btw. No games today have stories that rival books. Anyways im stiil waiting on my "giver" challenge. Vandalvideo
Zelda and Mario are most certainly not modern. They don't even have voice acting! The games are stuck in the past and relying on the gameplay mechanics of their predcessors. I like this lame cop out of "if you want a good story, read a book". Thats no excuse for Nintendo attempting a story and failing miserably. Like I said in my previous post, you better be prepared to hold Nintendo to the same standards as every other developer. IF they attempt something, and that something is crap, you BETTER down rank them for that. Nintendo attempted stories with zelda and mario, and those stories were crap. They deserve criticism for that.

i assume you are therefore going to rant the hell out of littlebigplanet when it comes out with not much of a story then.

Avatar image for UssjTrunks
UssjTrunks

11299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 UssjTrunks
Member since 2005 • 11299 Posts
Let's not forget that like 9 of the last 10 GOTYs were Nintendo exclusives.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#69 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Marth6781"] Metroid prime isnt modern? Zelda isnt modern? Mario isnt modern? Its funny how games try to imitate those 3 in their respective genre's yet fail. So if those games are old what does it say about the others? You rant on about presentation yet fail to realize story is only ONE PART. You want a "deep" story read a book, most devs agree to btw. No games today have stories that rival books. Anyways im stiil waiting on my "giver" challenge. samusarmada

Zelda and Mario are most certainly not modern. They don't even have voice acting! The games are stuck in the past and relying on the gameplay mechanics of their predcessors. I like this lame cop out of "if you want a good story, read a book". Thats no excuse for Nintendo attempting a story and failing miserably. Like I said in my previous post, you better be prepared to hold Nintendo to the same standards as every other developer. IF they attempt something, and that something is crap, you BETTER down rank them for that. Nintendo attempted stories with zelda and mario, and those stories were crap. They deserve criticism for that.

i assume you are therefore going to rant the hell out of littlebigplanet when it comes out with not much of a story then.

I have been knocking little big planet. Its nothing more than a modern adaptation of TIMs for the PC.
Avatar image for Donkey_Puncher
Donkey_Puncher

5083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Donkey_Puncher
Member since 2005 • 5083 Posts

Metroid prime isnt modern? Zelda isnt modern? Mario isnt modern? Its funny how games try to imitate those 3 in their respective genre's yet fail. So if those games are old what does it say about the others? You rant on about presentation yet fail to realize story is only ONE PART. You want a "deep" story read a book, most devs agree to btw. No games today have stories that rival books. Anyways im stiil waiting on my "giver" challenge. Marth6781

Dude, both Mario and Zelda are stuck in the past. Hell TP had MIDI music/sound effects and no voice acting, and all Nintendo fans could say was "zelda has always been like that!" Seriously, why can't they modernize and get with the times.

Zelda still plays like it always has, and SMG merely changed a slight bit over it's platforming predecessors.

Avatar image for Kakarot00769
Kakarot00769

9306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Kakarot00769
Member since 2004 • 9306 Posts

I wonder...if they are the best (don't get me wrong, I think they are top 3 devs)...why can't they make ANY new sucessful IPs. Nintendogs was one I suppose...but that's a gimmick game.dkhw

nintendogs, wii-fit ,wii-sports ,u may not like em but those are their new ip's

Avatar image for Kratos_OMEGA
Kratos_OMEGA

2872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 Kratos_OMEGA
Member since 2007 • 2872 Posts

Let's not forget that like 9 of the last 10 GOTYs were Nintendo exclusives.UssjTrunks

Because they made RE4?Goldeneye?Metroid Prime? lol

Avatar image for Donkey_Puncher
Donkey_Puncher

5083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Donkey_Puncher
Member since 2005 • 5083 Posts

[QUOTE="dkhw"]I wonder...if they are the best (don't get me wrong, I think they are top 3 devs)...why can't they make ANY new sucessful IPs. Nintendogs was one I suppose...but that's a gimmick game.Kakarot00769

nintendogs, wii-fit ,wii-sports ,u may not like em but those are their new ip's

Wii sports and Wii fit? A work out game and a collection of poor mini games.

Avatar image for GamerJM
GamerJM

1218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 GamerJM
Member since 2007 • 1218 Posts
Heck yes! Hey, I just noticed, I own every game on that list :o.
Avatar image for Cute_Red_Panda
Cute_Red_Panda

1734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Cute_Red_Panda
Member since 2008 • 1734 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]They sure are consistant with review scores, but I'd honestly like to see them modernize their franchises. Thats the main reason that I abhore Nintendo first party games. They're either whimsical nonsense or are outdated experiences. I'd like to see some cutscenes, intricate stories, voice acting, and higher production values.Always-Honest

blah, blah,.. nope. they are helping the industry forward. you aren't.

I use to think that, but they are not helping the industry. Actually they are splitting it. Two groups:

Casuals: Those who just experience video games on a touch-and-go bases i.e. parties, events, weddings, etc...

Hobbyists: Those who look for the high end quality gaming and consider it a past-time.

Avatar image for Marth6781
Marth6781

2564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Marth6781
Member since 2007 • 2564 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Marth6781"] Metroid prime isnt modern? Zelda isnt modern? Mario isnt modern? Its funny how games try to imitate those 3 in their respective genre's yet fail. So if those games are old what does it say about the others? You rant on about presentation yet fail to realize story is only ONE PART. You want a "deep" story read a book, most devs agree to btw. No games today have stories that rival books. Anyways im stiil waiting on my "giver" challenge.

Zelda and Mario are most certainly not modern. They don't even have voice acting! The games are stuck in the past and relying on the gameplay mechanics of their predcessors. I like this lame cop out of "if you want a good story, read a book". Thats no excuse for Nintendo attempting a story and failing miserably. Like I said in my previous post, you better be prepared to hold Nintendo to the same standards as every other developer. IF they attempt something, and that something is crap, you BETTER down rank them for that. Nintendo attempted stories with zelda and mario, and those stories were crap. They deserve criticism for that.

Didnt know the stories were crap. You seriously need to read a book; you think story and voice acting are modern, its been here since the SNES days. Level design and gameplay, ALWAYS come first, MUSIC is more important than story. So since nintendo stories supposedly suck, bring down the rank of EVERY DEV. since their music, gameplay, atmosphere, level design, funfactor COMPLETLY SUCK. See what I did there? Anyways you rave about story yet you cant name a game with a better story than "the giver", how bout i dumb it down(pun intended), name something better than DR. suess
Avatar image for Cute_Red_Panda
Cute_Red_Panda

1734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Cute_Red_Panda
Member since 2008 • 1734 Posts

[QUOTE="Marth6781"] :roll: like you dont play sequels. Whats funny is everytime releases a big name game somehow that genre is either pushed foward or people imitate. And untill I play a game that covers as many issues or has a better story than "the giver" an 8th grade book; story isn't important.Vandalvideo
Story is extremely important. I play sequals all the time, heck I ended up buying the new Zelda, Mario, and Metroid games. Even with the waggle, I couldn't shake the feelings that I was still playing Ocarina of Time and the older itterations of the other games. Thats a serious problem that NEEDS to be addressed. You can only play the same old game so many times before it gets boring. They need to modernize their games. IF tthey're going to attempt a story, it better have VO and good storytelling.

No use arguing with them...they think because it's fun, therefore innovative. Modernization is foreign to Nintendo. Their goal is how can we maximize the fun value from old concepts. Then again you can't blame them for it because Nintendo isn't as deep pocketed as Sony or Microsoft.

Avatar image for samusarmada
samusarmada

5816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#78 samusarmada
Member since 2005 • 5816 Posts
[QUOTE="samusarmada"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Marth6781"] Metroid prime isnt modern? Zelda isnt modern? Mario isnt modern? Its funny how games try to imitate those 3 in their respective genre's yet fail. So if those games are old what does it say about the others? You rant on about presentation yet fail to realize story is only ONE PART. You want a "deep" story read a book, most devs agree to btw. No games today have stories that rival books. Anyways im stiil waiting on my "giver" challenge. Vandalvideo

Zelda and Mario are most certainly not modern. They don't even have voice acting! The games are stuck in the past and relying on the gameplay mechanics of their predcessors. I like this lame cop out of "if you want a good story, read a book". Thats no excuse for Nintendo attempting a story and failing miserably. Like I said in my previous post, you better be prepared to hold Nintendo to the same standards as every other developer. IF they attempt something, and that something is crap, you BETTER down rank them for that. Nintendo attempted stories with zelda and mario, and those stories were crap. They deserve criticism for that.

i assume you are therefore going to rant the hell out of littlebigplanet when it comes out with not much of a story then.

I have been knocking little big planet. Its nothing more than a modern adaptation of TIMs for the PC.

fair enough then.

My contribution would be that i think zelda does need updating. It is the type of game that needs high production value in most areas. I dont think link should talk but I think voice acting should be added next time. I think the story needs to be more fleshed out. i am generally fine with the whole Ganondorf is bacck...again thing. But i think it should be fleshed out some more. I.e. less dungeons and more story driven moments (like carrying the sick midna to zelda)

I really dont think mario needs much of an update however. Voice acting was in sunshine and it sucked so Im glad that most of the characters remain muted or have no lines at all. I think the story could be expanded upon by putting more comic twist on it (the paper mario series already shows that nintendo are capable enough in humor). I am one of those people who really like Rosalina's story book so i have to say i still like the "cliche whimsical stories" as you put it. I would have to say though, that i would prefer the story to remain in the back seat of a mario game. We all know where its strength is.

Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#79 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

[QUOTE="Marth6781"]

Metroid prime isnt modern? Zelda isnt modern? Mario isnt modern? Its funny how games try to imitate those 3 in their respective genre's yet fail. So if those games are old what does it say about the others? You rant on about presentation yet fail to realize story is only ONE PART. You want a "deep" story read a book, most devs agree to btw. No games today have stories that rival books. Anyways im stiil waiting on my "giver" challenge. Donkey_Puncher

Dude, both Mario and Zelda are stuck in the past. Hell TP had MIDI music/sound effects and no voice acting, and all Nintendo fans could say was "zelda has always been like that!" Seriously, why can't they modernize and get with the times.

Zelda still plays like it always has, and SMG merely changed a slight bit over it's platforming predecessors.

You do know why Nintendo still uses Midi it is because in a games when you go into a battle for some games they need a pause because the game has to change the song, but with Midi the music can easily make a tranistion to the next song without having any pause that is why Nintendo still uses Midi. Also Twilight Princess had some Voice Acting Midna had a voice it was in a different Language Navi talked in Ocarina of Time, Mario talks they don't have heavy dialogue in his games he has talked since Mario 64, they also had voice acting in Mario Kart series ever since Mario Kart 64, SSB series had voice acting since its begining, Nintendo just doesn't like having heavy voice acting.
Avatar image for aka_aj03
aka_aj03

5911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 aka_aj03
Member since 2004 • 5911 Posts

[QUOTE="dkhw"]I wonder...if they are the best (don't get me wrong, I think they are top 3 devs)...why can't they make ANY new sucessful IPs. Nintendogs was one I suppose...but that's a gimmick game.Kakarot00769

nintendogs, wii-fit ,wii-sports ,u may not like em but those are their new ip's

This is the real chick in your sig... welcome to reality.

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts

[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]wiisports and wiifit are first party too.. the wiimote is first party and the ds is first party.. zelda: PH has great innovative controls , and so have wii sports.i think you are the one playing modernised games mainly while you accuse nintendo of doing the same. fans ask fore these games.Voice over isn't required at all... why?. you have somne strange standards.. story is of NO importance in games and are usually very unoriginal (save the world/ defeat the enemy). The only thing i dislike about the wii are the graphics.. i'd like them to be up to par with 360 or ps3.. but gameplay is fine.Vandalvideo
Again, you failed to address my post. You seem to be stuck on this idea that innovation = modernization, and it doesn't. Its even debateable if the wiimote is innovate. As far as modernization goes, that includes higher production values, voice acting, storytelling, etc. The whole concept of modernization is to bring the games into the modern era. You can't do that when you're dealing with time old concepts. Voice acting is quentesential to the modern game. All of Nintendo's major first party titles are stuck in the past. You can only play Zelda and Mario so many times.

wiimote = innovation in controls and gameplay..

storytelling has NOTHING to do with modernisation or innovation.. NOTHING.. voice acting might be a techincall isuue.. but they could easily do this. Higher productiuon values?. nintendo has the highest production values in their first party titles.

Some games have old concepts.. like i allready confirmed. so do almost ALL the game YOU play.

again wiisports and wiifit are not in the past.. and first party.

what you fail to see is that YOU are proibably playing far more old games than wii owners. almost VERYTHING on 360 and PS3 are graphicall upgrades of the same games (some increadibly good, and i like to play them) lets' keep it real here.

With out the wii, there would be three of the same consoles.. multi media devices with slightly upgraded games.

The wii opens up new world of gaming. the problem is.,. they are game YOU don't want to play because YOU are stucvk in the past.

YOu won't play wii fiut and wii sports.. you wan to play either a old rpg or shooter.. cause that's ALL that ps3 and 360 offer.

I don't mind, cause i like upgraded shooters and rpg's, but i also like real innovation like wii sports, wii fitt, Flow (which i DOUBT you played cause no story = end of story for you), echodrome (which i DOIUBT you will play.. no story = end of story for you)..

you are full of it.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#82 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Marth6781"] Didnt know the stories were crap. You seriously need to read a book; you think story and voice acting are modern, its been here since the SNES days. Level design and gameplay, ALWAYS come first, MUSIC is more important than story. So since nintendo stories supposedly suck, bring down the rank of EVERY DEV. since their music, gameplay, atmosphere, level design, funfactor COMPLETLY SUCK. See what I did there? Anyways you rave about story yet you cant name a game with a better story than "the giver", how bout i dumb it down(pun intended), name something better than DR. suess

Music and story are two of the most important factors when I'm deciding a game purchase. Thats why two of my favorite games of all time are Silent Hill and Suikoden. Like I said in the earlier post, that you so easily edited out, these two games have some of the best stories and music of all time. Suikoden is based off of the chinese mythos of Water margin, one of China's greatest four classical novels. Silent Hill is based off of the mine fires and subsequent evactuation of Centralia, Pennslyvania. Story is extremely important in video games, as it provides motivation to continue playing. If I want instant gratification I'll go play plinkos for 10 bucks. I expect more out of aproduct I'm paying almost 50-60 bucks for!
Avatar image for Marth6781
Marth6781

2564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Marth6781
Member since 2007 • 2564 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Marth6781"] Didnt know the stories were crap. You seriously need to read a book; you think story and voice acting are modern, its been here since the SNES days. Level design and gameplay, ALWAYS come first, MUSIC is more important than story. So since nintendo stories supposedly suck, bring down the rank of EVERY DEV. since their music, gameplay, atmosphere, level design, funfactor COMPLETLY SUCK. See what I did there? Anyways you rave about story yet you cant name a game with a better story than "the giver", how bout i dumb it down(pun intended), name something better than DR. suess

Music and story are two of the most important factors when I'm deciding a game purchase. Thats why two of my favorite games of all time are Silent Hill and Suikoden. Like I said in the earlier post, that you so easily edited out, these two games have some of the best stories and music of all time. Suikoden is based off of the chinese mythos of Water margin, one of China's greatest four classical novels. Silent Hill is based off of the mine fires and subsequent evactuation of Centralia, Pennslyvania. Story is extremely important in video games, as it provides motivation to continue playing. If I want instant gratification I'll go play plinkos for 10 bucks. I expect more out of aproduct I'm paying almost 50-60 bucks for!

Ive played silent hill, RE series is far better becuz of OMFG GAMEPLAY something you seem to hate.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#84 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
wiimote = innovation in controls and gameplay storytelling has NOTHING to do with modernisation or innovation.. NOTHING.. voice acting might be a techincall isuue.. but they could easily do this. Higher productiuon values?. nintendo has the highest production values in their first party titles.Some games have old concepts.. like i allready confirmed. so do almost ALL the game YOU play. again wiisports and wiifit are not in the past.. and first party.what you fail to see is that YOU are proibably playing far more old games than wii owners. almost VERYTHING on 360 and PS3 are graphicall upgrades of the same games (some increadibly good, and i like to play them) lets' keep it real here.With out the wii, there would be three of the same consoles.. multi media devices with slightly upgraded games.he wii opens up new world of gaming. the problem is.,. they are game YOU don't want to play because YOU are stucvk in the past.YOu won't play wii fiut and wii sports.. you wan to play either a old rpg or shooter.. cause that's ALL that ps3 and 360 offer.I don't mind, cause i like upgraded shooters and rpg's, but i also like real innovation like wii sports, wii fitt, Flow (which i DOUBT you played cause no story = end of story for you), echodrome (which i DOIUBT you will play.. no story = end of story for you)..Always-Honest
Storytelling is only one of the major facets of modernization alongside voice acting, high calibur music (not midi remixes), gameplay, cutscenes, etc. You CANNOT excuse NIntendo for crappy stories just because they're Nintendo. If they attempt something and that something is crap, you BETTER hold them accountable for that. Nintendo is stuick in the past with most of their first party titles; Zelda, Mario, and Metroid. How am I the one stuck in the past when they're standing still? I'm holding Nintendo up to the same standards as the entire industry. Its called being FAIR. I will not make exceptions just because they're Nintendo. Did I ever say that I won't be playing these games? You're putting words in my mouth. Because I'm an objective gamer, I play all the games before I speak a word about them. I bought Zelda, THEN I bashed it. I bought mario, THEN i pointed out its flaws. I bought Halo 3, THEN I pointed out the issues in that game. I buy my games THEN I comment on the problems they have.
Avatar image for aka_aj03
aka_aj03

5911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 aka_aj03
Member since 2004 • 5911 Posts
[QUOTE="Marth6781"] Didnt know the stories were crap. You seriously need to read a book; you think story and voice acting are modern, its been here since the SNES days. Level design and gameplay, ALWAYS come first, MUSIC is more important than story. So since nintendo stories supposedly suck, bring down the rank of EVERY DEV. since their music, gameplay, atmosphere, level design, funfactor COMPLETLY SUCK. See what I did there? Anyways you rave about story yet you cant name a game with a better story than "the giver", how bout i dumb it down(pun intended), name something better than DR. suessVandalvideo
Music and story are two of the most important factors when I'm deciding a game purchase. Thats why two of my favorite games of all time are Silent Hill and Suikoden. Like I said in the earlier post, that you so easily edited out, these two games have some of the best stories and music of all time. Suikoden is based off of the chinese mythos of Water margin, one of China's greatest four classical novels. Silent Hill is based off of the mine fires and subsequent evactuation of Centralia, Pennslyvania. Story is extremely important in video games, as it provides motivation to continue playing. If I want instant gratification I'll go play plinkos for 10 bucks. I expect more out of aproduct I'm paying almost 50-60 bucks for!

The music and the story in God of War get you going... the music in this game is so awesome.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#86 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Marth6781"] Ive played silent hill, RE series is far better becuz of OMFG GAMEPLAY something you seem to hate.

Way to completely avoid my post by posting irrelavant scarecrows.
Avatar image for Kakarot00769
Kakarot00769

9306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Kakarot00769
Member since 2004 • 9306 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Marth6781"] :roll: like you dont play sequels. Whats funny is everytime releases a big name game somehow that genre is either pushed foward or people imitate. And untill I play a game that covers as many issues or has a better story than "the giver" an 8th grade book; story isn't important.dkhw

Story is extremely important. I play sequals all the time, heck I ended up buying the new Zelda, Mario, and Metroid games. Even with the waggle, I couldn't shake the feelings that I was still playing Ocarina of Time and the older itterations of the other games. Thats a serious problem that NEEDS to be addressed. You can only play the same old game so many times before it gets boring. They need to modernize their games. IF tthey're going to attempt a story, it better have VO and good storytelling.

I have to agree. Gaming is about the whole experience. Presentation. Sound. Graphics. Story. Multiplayer for shooters (Metroid Prime). To say that controller innovation = entire gaming experience is pure ignorance.

will wright said it best ..(and believe me he knows more than you and me )

"the PS3 and the Xbox 360 feel like better versions of the last, but pretty much the same game with incremental improvement. But the Wii feels like a major jump - not that the graphics are more powerful, but that it hits a completely different demographic

-in other words you can now do motion controls of your character ,that has never been done b4 in gaming ..thats a huge leap in gaming much more so than voice acting ( which is crappy most of the time)

Avatar image for Marth6781
Marth6781

2564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Marth6781
Member since 2007 • 2564 Posts
[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]wiimote = innovation in controls and gameplay storytelling has NOTHING to do with modernisation or innovation.. NOTHING.. voice acting might be a techincall isuue.. but they could easily do this. Higher productiuon values?. nintendo has the highest production values in their first party titles.Some games have old concepts.. like i allready confirmed. so do almost ALL the game YOU play. again wiisports and wiifit are not in the past.. and first party.what you fail to see is that YOU are proibably playing far more old games than wii owners. almost VERYTHING on 360 and PS3 are graphicall upgrades of the same games (some increadibly good, and i like to play them) lets' keep it real here.With out the wii, there would be three of the same consoles.. multi media devices with slightly upgraded games.he wii opens up new world of gaming. the problem is.,. they are game YOU don't want to play because YOU are stucvk in the past.YOu won't play wii fiut and wii sports.. you wan to play either a old rpg or shooter.. cause that's ALL that ps3 and 360 offer.I don't mind, cause i like upgraded shooters and rpg's, but i also like real innovation like wii sports, wii fitt, Flow (which i DOUBT you played cause no story = end of story for you), echodrome (which i DOIUBT you will play.. no story = end of story for you)..Vandalvideo
Storytelling is only one of the major facets of modernization alongside voice acting, high calibur music (not midi remixes), gameplay, cutscenes, etc. You CANNOT excuse NIntendo for crappy stories just because they're Nintendo. If they attempt something and that something is crap, you BETTER hold them accountable for that. Nintendo is stuick in the past with most of their first party titles; Zelda, Mario, and Metroid. How am I the one stuck in the past when they're standing still? I'm holding Nintendo up to the same standards as the entire industry. Its called being FAIR. I will not make exceptions just because they're Nintendo. Did I ever say that I won't be playing these games? You're putting words in my mouth. Because I'm an objective gamer, I play all the games before I speak a word about them. I bought Zelda, THEN I bashed it. I bought mario, THEN i pointed out its flaws. I bought Halo 3, THEN I pointed out the issues in that game. I buy my games THEN I comment on the problems they have.

You know what, im done. You still seem to think story is the only part of modernization. Have fun with counter strike and COD4 fanboy.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#89 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Always-Honest"]wiimote = innovation in controls and gameplay storytelling has NOTHING to do with modernisation or innovation.. NOTHING.. voice acting might be a techincall isuue.. but they could easily do this. Higher productiuon values?. nintendo has the highest production values in their first party titles.Some games have old concepts.. like i allready confirmed. so do almost ALL the game YOU play. again wiisports and wiifit are not in the past.. and first party.what you fail to see is that YOU are proibably playing far more old games than wii owners. almost VERYTHING on 360 and PS3 are graphicall upgrades of the same games (some increadibly good, and i like to play them) lets' keep it real here.With out the wii, there would be three of the same consoles.. multi media devices with slightly upgraded games.he wii opens up new world of gaming. the problem is.,. they are game YOU don't want to play because YOU are stucvk in the past.YOu won't play wii fiut and wii sports.. you wan to play either a old rpg or shooter.. cause that's ALL that ps3 and 360 offer.I don't mind, cause i like upgraded shooters and rpg's, but i also like real innovation like wii sports, wii fitt, Flow (which i DOUBT you played cause no story = end of story for you), echodrome (which i DOIUBT you will play.. no story = end of story for you)..Marth6781
Storytelling is only one of the major facets of modernization alongside voice acting, high calibur music (not midi remixes), gameplay, cutscenes, etc. You CANNOT excuse NIntendo for crappy stories just because they're Nintendo. If they attempt something and that something is crap, you BETTER hold them accountable for that. Nintendo is stuick in the past with most of their first party titles; Zelda, Mario, and Metroid. How am I the one stuck in the past when they're standing still? I'm holding Nintendo up to the same standards as the entire industry. Its called being FAIR. I will not make exceptions just because they're Nintendo. Did I ever say that I won't be playing these games? You're putting words in my mouth. Because I'm an objective gamer, I play all the games before I speak a word about them. I bought Zelda, THEN I bashed it. I bought mario, THEN i pointed out its flaws. I bought Halo 3, THEN I pointed out the issues in that game. I buy my games THEN I comment on the problems they have.

You know what, im done. You still seem to think story is the only part of modernization. Have fun with counter strike and COD4 fanboy.

Now I know you didn't read my post, you wanna know how? Read my first sentence! "Story is only one of the major facets of modernization alongside voice acting, high calibur music, cutscenes, new gameplay mechanics, etc".
Avatar image for deactivated-57a12126af02c
deactivated-57a12126af02c

3290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 deactivated-57a12126af02c
Member since 2007 • 3290 Posts
Well they've also had more time than Sony and MS.
Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts

Storytelling is only one of the major facets of modernization alongside voice acting, high calibur music (not midi remixes), gameplay, cutscenes, etc. You CANNOT excuse NIntendo for crappy stories just because they're Nintendo. If they attempt something and that something is crap, you BETTER hold them accountable for that. Nintendo is stuick in the past with most of their first party titles; Zelda, Mario, and Metroid. How am I the one stuck in the past when they're standing still? I'm holding Nintendo up to the same standards as the entire industry. Its called being FAIR. I will not make exceptions just because they're Nintendo. Did I ever say that I won't be playing these games? You're putting words in my mouth. Because I'm an objective gamer, I play all the games before I speak a word about them. I bought Zelda, THEN I bashed it. I bought mario, THEN i pointed out its flaws. I bought Halo 3, THEN I pointed out the issues in that game. I buy my games THEN I comment on the problems they have.Vandalvideo

storytelling is ancient.. nothing modern about it... it all started with story telling...

Lots of games have crappy stories, 99%. I don't need a story in a game. i want good gameplay. LOTS OF GREAT GAMES WITH NO STORY OR BAD STORY.. stop with saying story is important in games. it's NOT. maybe to you, but it's NOT.

Nintendo isn't stuck in the past, FANS are stuck in the past. Nintendo tries new things thank god. And even when they please the fans, they try new things.

I also play games first before i say anything about them. therefre it's easy for me to say that Nintendo at least TRIES to bring something different. Wiisports might not be the best game, but it's new and refreshing. The wiimote is also MUCH more immersive and intuitve for shooters. to badgraphics suck butt, but i'd like to use the controller in the many shooters i play on Ps3 or 360.

i put words in your mouth cause i think you are talking nonsense. YOU play rehashes all the time, just like me.. i think you bash the Wii without valid reasons. Technically the wii could have been better, but it would also been more expensive. They trying to expand the gaming audience and the gaming industry so it will become a normal part of everyones life like reading, movies and music

if it were up to YOU, gaming would be for a small group of people that has no creativity. gaming would Die.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#92 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
storytelling is ancient.. nothing modern about it... it all started with story telling...Lots of games have crappy stories, 99%. I don't need a story in a game. i want good gameplay. LOTS OF GREAT GAMES WITH NO STORY OR BAD STORY.. stop with saying story is important in games. it's NOT. maybe to you, but it's NOT.Nintendo isn't stuck in the past, FANS are stuck in the past. Nintendo tries new things thank god. And even when they please the fans, they try new things. I also play games first before i say anything about them. therefre it's easy for me to say that Nintendo at least TRIES to bring something different. Wiisports might not be the best game, but it's new and refreshing. The wiimote is also MUCH more immersive and intuitve for shooters. to badgraphics suck butt, but i'd like to use the controller in the many shooters i play on Ps3 or 360 i put words in your mouth cause i think you are talking nonsense. YOU play rehashes all the time, just like me.. i think you bash the Wii without valid reasons. Technically the wii could have been better, but it would also been more expensive. They trying to expand the gaming audience and the gaming industry so it will become a normal part of everyones life like reading, movies and music if it were up to YOU, gaming would be for a small group of people that has no creativity. gaming would Die.Always-Honest
A good story is actually relatively modern in the gaming industry, considering how games used to not have a story at all. Good stories are indeed one facet of modernization. Nintendo is the one stuck in the past. THEY keep making games that are stuck in the past. You should hold them accountable for this. Just because its Nintendo DOES NOT mean you can forgive them for a horrible story. As far as the wiimote goes, YOUR OPINION. I myself was taken-aback by the waggle and the wiimote. OMG I'm firing a TV remote at my television with horrible native sound. Teh immersion. :o And again, I AM NOT bashing the wii, I'm merely holding it to the same standards as everyone else in the industry.
Avatar image for Microsoft1234
Microsoft1234

7683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#93 Microsoft1234
Member since 2006 • 7683 Posts
um no voice chat in brawl? enuf said, the online coulda been alterd for brawl i mean come on no voice chat, thats an absolute joke, nintendo coulda done something to compensate for it
Avatar image for yellowandmushy
yellowandmushy

2095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 yellowandmushy
Member since 2006 • 2095 Posts
They make damn good games.
Avatar image for JB730
JB730

3375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 JB730
Member since 2004 • 3375 Posts
[QUOTE="Demetri_OS"][QUOTE="Kakarot00769"][QUOTE="Demetri_OS"]

Remember when Nintendo was trounced by the PS1 in the N64 days? There is your dispute.

And how the PS2 destroyed the Gamecube?

Sure they have the handheld market and the Wii is "winning". But, it is in no way "undisputed".

Kakarot00769

come up w/ any aaa e from psp and ps3 that are made by sony (not its 3rd parties) .we will see how many they have?

The OP states UNDISPUTED. When Nintendo clearly IS disputed.

You question makes NO sense, since I already stated the DS (PSP's competition) and the Wii (PS3's competition) is ahead. Right now, sure, they are doing great. But, since you asked it, you answer it. I do not care. I am addressing the OP on the undisputed remark.

But, in the past, they held a terrible market share with the Gamecube. And the N64 was wrecked by the PS1 (Nintendo lost Final Fantasy, Sony got Resiedent Evil, Sony got Metal Gear, Sony got Gran Turismo, etc. etc.)

Don't forget the past, thats where Nintendo make MANY mistakes.

do u have that lists of AAAE titles that are made by sony for the psp and ps3 (not their 3rd parties) yet ? or are you still talking about teh past?

this put an end to this little conversation real quick :lol:

rofl @ sony being a better DEVELOPER than nintendo......cows can be real delusional sometimes

don't be mad wii-haters, nintendo's simply the best right now

5AAAE's in just a year and a half time span? wii-haters, go ahead and name another developer that has accomplished this. please, don't get angry and try to argue with me, just a name another developer that has done this. i'll be waiting.

Avatar image for JB730
JB730

3375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 JB730
Member since 2004 • 3375 Posts

um no voice chat in brawl? enuf said, the online coulda been alterd for brawl i mean come on no voice chat, thats an absolute joke, nintendo coulda done something to compensate for itMicrosoft1234

9.5

anything you say from now on to bash SSBB can and will be rendered null and void

Avatar image for Kakarot00769
Kakarot00769

9306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 Kakarot00769
Member since 2004 • 9306 Posts

Well they've also had more time than Sony and MS. kool-aids

i posted the DS and Wii titles from nintendo got AAAE from GS and they were quite a few ,i challenge you or any1 in here to come up with AAAE titles that are made by Sony (not 3rd party) for psp and ps3 since release and MS (not 3rd party) since xbox 360 was released ,see if they can come up w/ more AAAE

Avatar image for deactivated-57a12126af02c
deactivated-57a12126af02c

3290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 deactivated-57a12126af02c
Member since 2007 • 3290 Posts

[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]storytelling is ancient.. nothing modern about it... it all started with story telling...Lots of games have crappy stories, 99%. I don't need a story in a game. i want good gameplay. LOTS OF GREAT GAMES WITH NO STORY OR BAD STORY.. stop with saying story is important in games. it's NOT. maybe to you, but it's NOT.Nintendo isn't stuck in the past, FANS are stuck in the past. Nintendo tries new things thank god. And even when they please the fans, they try new things. I also play games first before i say anything about them. therefre it's easy for me to say that Nintendo at least TRIES to bring something different. Wiisports might not be the best game, but it's new and refreshing. The wiimote is also MUCH more immersive and intuitve for shooters. to badgraphics suck butt, but i'd like to use the controller in the many shooters i play on Ps3 or 360 i put words in your mouth cause i think you are talking nonsense. YOU play rehashes all the time, just like me.. i think you bash the Wii without valid reasons. Technically the wii could have been better, but it would also been more expensive. They trying to expand the gaming audience and the gaming industry so it will become a normal part of everyones life like reading, movies and music if it were up to YOU, gaming would be for a small group of people that has no creativity. gaming would Die.Vandalvideo
A good story is actually relatively modern in the gaming industry, considering how games used to not have a story at all. Good stories are indeed one facet of modernization. Nintendo is the one stuck in the past. THEY keep making games that are stuck in the past. You should hold them accountable for this. Just because its Nintendo DOES NOT mean you can forgive them for a horrible story. As far as the wiimote goes, YOUR OPINION. I myself was taken-aback by the waggle and the wiimote. OMG I'm firing a TV remote at my television with horrible native sound. Teh immersion. :o And again, I AM NOT bashing the wii, I'm merely holding it to the same standards as everyone else in the industry.

Why is it most of Nintendo's games have bad storylines? Have they ever created a good story built game?

Call me up when they make a story that is better than MGS or Bioshock.

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts

A good story is actually relatively modern in the gaming industry, considering how games used to not have a story at all. Good stories are indeed one facet of modernization. Nintendo is the one stuck in the past. THEY keep making games that are stuck in the past. You should hold them accountable for this. Just because its Nintendo DOES NOT mean you can forgive them for a horrible story. As far as the wiimote goes, YOUR OPINION. I myself was taken-aback by the waggle and the wiimote. OMG I'm firing a TV remote at my television with horrible native sound. Teh immersion. :o And again, I AM NOT bashing the wii, I'm merely holding it to the same standards as everyone else in the industry.Vandalvideo

-lots of games had stories.

-most stories today are the same and uninspired (save the world, save somebody, good vs evil).

-the wiimote is far more immersive (no opinon, proven fact as it's far easier to pick up and play), yet some people are too used to the ancient dual analog controller (though it was much harder to learn those controls, but you forgot)

-i forgive nintendo for not spending too much time on something as irrelevcant as a story (although they have games with just as great storiesas other games, you generalis)

-the sound in the wiimote is horrible,i agree. but in some games it;'s a great feature.

-you are NOT holding the same standards, you are holding the 360 and PS3 standards....

anayway, we disagree. i am right and you are wrong.

Avatar image for RurouniSaiyajin
RurouniSaiyajin

4951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 RurouniSaiyajin
Member since 2007 • 4951 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]A good story is actually relatively modern in the gaming industry, considering how games used to not have a story at all. Good stories are indeed one facet of modernization. Nintendo is the one stuck in the past. THEY keep making games that are stuck in the past. You should hold them accountable for this. Just because its Nintendo DOES NOT mean you can forgive them for a horrible story. As far as the wiimote goes, YOUR OPINION. I myself was taken-aback by the waggle and the wiimote. OMG I'm firing a TV remote at my television with horrible native sound. Teh immersion. :o And again, I AM NOT bashing the wii, I'm merely holding it to the same standards as everyone else in the industry.Always-Honest

-lots of games had stories.

-most stories today are the same and uninspired (save the world, save somebody, good vs evil).

-the wiimote is far more immersive (no opinon, proven fact as it's far easier to pick up and play), yet some people are too used to the ancient dual analog controller (though it was much harder to learn those controls, but you forgot)

-i forgive nintendo for not spending too much time on something as irrelevcant as a story (although they have games with just as great storiesas other games, you generalis)

-the sound in the wiimote is horrible,i agree. but in some games it;'s a great feature.

-you are NOT holding the same standards, you are holding the 360 and PS3 standards....

anayway, we disagree.i am right and you are wrong.

..You don't understand the basic concept of opinions do you?