This topic is locked from further discussion.
Majora's Mask has one of themost mature stories ever. Zelda doesn't need to be an M rated, glitchy RPG.
[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]Let me guess saving some princess from an evil wizard?Majora's Mask has one of themost mature stories ever. Zelda doesn't need to be an M rated, glitchy RPG.
Barsy7
Nope you're trying to stop the moon from crashing into a town and you need to relive the same 3 days. There's more to it than that though. Look it up. Zelda is mentioned once and Ganondorf is never even mentioned.
Let me guess saving some princess from an evil wizard?[QUOTE="Barsy7"][QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]
Majora's Mask has one of themost mature stories ever. Zelda doesn't need to be an M rated, glitchy RPG.
turtlethetaffer
Nope you're trying to stop the moon from crashing into a town and you need to relive the same 3 days. There's more to it than that though. Look it up. Zelda is mentioned once and Ganondorf is never even mentioned.
And the final boss is some evil wizard?Aren't they both adventure games. Skyrim is the better adventure game.... another... wait let me emphaise this, ANOTHER topic comparing SKYRIM with ZELDA. The two are completelty differernt games trying to achieve completely differernt things. Completely differernt genre, completely differernt experience.
simomate
Just... no.
[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"][QUOTE="Barsy7"] Let me guess saving some princess from an evil wizard?Barsy7
Nope you're trying to stop the moon from crashing into a town and you need to relive the same 3 days. There's more to it than that though. Look it up. Zelda is mentioned once and Ganondorf is never even mentioned.
And the final boss is some evil wizard?Nope it's this guy.
[QUOTE="simomate"]Aren't they both adventure games. Skyrim is the better adventure game.... another... wait let me emphaise this, ANOTHER topic comparing SKYRIM with ZELDA. The two are completelty differernt games trying to achieve completely differernt things. Completely differernt genre, completely differernt experience.
Just... no.Barsy7
No, Skyrim is an RPG, how can you not know such simple things?
And the final boss is some evil wizard?[QUOTE="Barsy7"][QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]
Nope you're trying to stop the moon from crashing into a town and you need to relive the same 3 days. There's more to it than that though. Look it up. Zelda is mentioned once and Ganondorf is never even mentioned.
turtlethetaffer
Nope it's this guy.
I see no picture. Edit: nevermindAren't they both adventure games. Skyrim is the better adventure game.[QUOTE="Barsy7"][QUOTE="simomate"]
... another... wait let me emphaise this, ANOTHER topic comparing SKYRIM with ZELDA. The two are completelty differernt games trying to achieve completely differernt things. Completely differernt genre, completely differernt experience.
Just... no.WreckEm711
No, Skyrim is an RPG, how can you not know such simple things?
It is still leagues ahead of anything Zelda has done.[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"][QUOTE="Barsy7"] And the final boss is some evil wizard?Barsy7
Nope it's this guy.
I see no picture. Edit: nevermindSo yeah it's pretty unique and daring. No other game is like it.
One look at your sig and I can tell your an anti-nintendo fanboy which means you are not open minded, open minded gamers play all genre's including Nintendo's which you obvously don't. And maybe some of us don't want a mature zelda and it's impossible to tell by videos alone that SS sucks and it has some serious depth, thats obviously the game you are talking about, and zelda will never be multiplatform, nintendo has said they would rather be dead, then multiplatform, and capcom developing samsh bros,I for one want Smash to stay a brawler because I hate "real fighters" as you call them. And Metroid was way past its prime when Metroid Primes was released(see what i did there :D ) You obviously are just a troll with no idea what your talking about.layton2012I do know what I'm talking about and it is that Nintendo needs to evolve. They should take notes from western devs.
[QUOTE="layton2012"]One look at your sig and I can tell your an anti-nintendo fanboy which means you are not open minded, open minded gamers play all genre's including Nintendo's which you obvously don't. And maybe some of us don't want a mature zelda and it's impossible to tell by videos alone that SS sucks and it has some serious depth, thats obviously the game you are talking about, and zelda will never be multiplatform, nintendo has said they would rather be dead, then multiplatform, and capcom developing samsh bros,I for one want Smash to stay a brawler because I hate "real fighters" as you call them. And Metroid was way past its prime when Metroid Primes was released(see what i did there :D ) You obviously are just a troll with no idea what your talking about.Barsy7I do know what I'm talking about and it is that Nintendo needs to evolve. They should take notes from western devs.
Um, no. They do make changes to games.
[QUOTE="WreckEm711"][QUOTE="Barsy7"] Aren't they both adventure games. Skyrim is the better adventure game.Barsy7
No, Skyrim is an RPG, how can you not know such simple things?
It is still leagues ahead of anything Zelda has done.I completely agree as I highly prefer Skyrim, but its like comparing a machine gun to an ice-cream cone and complaining the gun doesn't taste good, they're each out to accomplish different things.
[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"][QUOTE="Barsy7"] I see no picture. Edit: nevermindBarsy7
So yeah it's pretty unique and daring. No other game is like it.
Uniques? yes. Not as daring as fighting dragons.Yes because Skyrim is the first video game to have you fight dragons ever :|
[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"][QUOTE="Barsy7"] I see no picture. Edit: nevermindBarsy7
So yeah it's pretty unique and daring. No other game is like it.
Uniques? yes. Not as daring as fighting dragons.You do fight a huge Jungle Warrior, Giant Mechnical Goat, Huge ass fish, and Massive twin Sand Worm things, not to mention go inside an evil moon and help numerous people in a repeating three day structure. Seems pretty daring for a game that sticks to a well known formula to me.
It is still leagues ahead of anything Zelda has done.[QUOTE="Barsy7"][QUOTE="WreckEm711"]
No, Skyrim is an RPG, how can you not know such simple things?
WreckEm711
I completely agree as I highly prefer Skyrim, but its like comparing a machine gun to an ice-cream cone and complaining the gun doesn't taste good, they're each out to accomplish different things.
Both are games and should try to accomplish being fun.[QUOTE="WreckEm711"][QUOTE="Barsy7"] It is still leagues ahead of anything Zelda has done.Barsy7
I completely agree as I highly prefer Skyrim, but its like comparing a machine gun to an ice-cream cone and complaining the gun doesn't taste good, they're each out to accomplish different things.
Both are games and should try to accomplish being fun.And millions of people find Zelda fun, because of the type of gameplay it has. It's not trying to provide the same type of gameplay as Skyrim. It's different kind of fun
[QUOTE="layton2012"]One look at your sig and I can tell your an anti-nintendo fanboy which means you are not open minded, open minded gamers play all genre's including Nintendo's which you obvously don't. And maybe some of us don't want a mature zelda and it's impossible to tell by videos alone that SS sucks and it has some serious depth, thats obviously the game you are talking about, and zelda will never be multiplatform, nintendo has said they would rather be dead, then multiplatform, and capcom developing samsh bros,I for one want Smash to stay a brawler because I hate "real fighters" as you call them. And Metroid was way past its prime when Metroid Primes was released(see what i did there :D ) You obviously are just a troll with no idea what your talking about.Barsy7I do know what I'm talking about and it is that Nintendo needs to evolve. They should take notes from western devs. What and become a generic FPS, and Nintendo is going HD sure 6 years late, what do you want them do, the only thing "great" western developer is COD which i don't even like.Retro is the only western developer that has amazed me IMO.
[QUOTE="WreckEm711"][QUOTE="Barsy7"] It is still leagues ahead of anything Zelda has done.Barsy7
I completely agree as I highly prefer Skyrim, but its like comparing a machine gun to an ice-cream cone and complaining the gun doesn't taste good, they're each out to accomplish different things.
Both are games and should try to accomplish being fun.Which they both do.
Come on, guys. :P
Stop feeding him.
mmmwksil
If people stopped responding to topics because of the TCs being trolls than SW would cease to exist...
[QUOTE="mmmwksil"]Oh cause I disagree with you I'm a troll?Come on, guys. :P
Stop feeding him.
Barsy7
Dude... your sig is trollish.
Both are games and should try to accomplish being fun.[QUOTE="Barsy7"][QUOTE="WreckEm711"]
I completely agree as I highly prefer Skyrim, but its like comparing a machine gun to an ice-cream cone and complaining the gun doesn't taste good, they're each out to accomplish different things.
WreckEm711
And millions of people find Zelda fun, because of the type of gameplay it has. It's not trying to provide the same type of gameplay as Skyrim. It's different kind of fun
Millions of kids.[QUOTE="WreckEm711"][QUOTE="Barsy7"] Both are games and should try to accomplish being fun.Barsy7
And millions of people find Zelda fun, because of the type of gameplay it has. It's not trying to provide the same type of gameplay as Skyrim. It's different kind of fun
Millions of kids.Same goes for Modern Warfare, all of the CoD games.
[QUOTE="Barsy7"][QUOTE="layton2012"]One look at your sig and I can tell your an anti-nintendo fanboy which means you are not open minded, open minded gamers play all genre's including Nintendo's which you obvously don't. And maybe some of us don't want a mature zelda and it's impossible to tell by videos alone that SS sucks and it has some serious depth, thats obviously the game you are talking about, and zelda will never be multiplatform, nintendo has said they would rather be dead, then multiplatform, and capcom developing samsh bros,I for one want Smash to stay a brawler because I hate "real fighters" as you call them. And Metroid was way past its prime when Metroid Primes was released(see what i did there :D ) You obviously are just a troll with no idea what your talking about.layton2012I do know what I'm talking about and it is that Nintendo needs to evolve. They should take notes from western devs. What and become a generic FPS, and Nintendo is going HD sure 6 years late, what do you want them do, the only thing "great" western developer is COD which i don't even like.Retro is the only western developer that has amazed me IMO. I do not feel many FPS games of today are generic. Quite different actually. Nintendo doesn't even have trophies/achievements.
Millions of kids.[QUOTE="Barsy7"][QUOTE="WreckEm711"]
And millions of people find Zelda fun, because of the type of gameplay it has. It's not trying to provide the same type of gameplay as Skyrim. It's different kind of fun
turtlethetaffer
Same goes for Modern Warfare, all of the CoD games.
Any child who plays CoD have matured much faster than their peers.[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"][QUOTE="Barsy7"] Millions of kids.Barsy7
Same goes for Modern Warfare, all of the CoD games.
Any child who plays CoD have matured much faster than their peers.No they haven't, which is blatantly obvious if you've ever heard voicechat on Xbox live.
[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"][QUOTE="Barsy7"] Millions of kids.Barsy7
Same goes for Modern Warfare, all of the CoD games.
Any child who plays CoD have matured much faster than their peers.Who are you? You have to be an alt, there's no way you're serious. I have a feeling you're that guy who parodies Sony fanboys.
Any child who plays CoD have matured much faster than their peers.[QUOTE="Barsy7"][QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]
Same goes for Modern Warfare, all of the CoD games.
WreckEm711
No they haven't, which is blatantly obvious if you've ever heard voicechat on Xbox live.
That is only a small minority and they were provoked.[QUOTE="layton2012"][QUOTE="Barsy7"] I do know what I'm talking about and it is that Nintendo needs to evolve. They should take notes from western devs.Barsy7What and become a generic FPS, and Nintendo is going HD sure 6 years late, what do you want them do, the only thing "great" western developer is COD which i don't even like.Retro is the only western developer that has amazed me IMO. I do not feel many FPS games of today are generic. Quite different actually. Nintendo doesn't even have trophies/achievements. Ohh Nintendo doesn't have trophies or achievements, NIntendo is doomed, doomed I tell you :D . And for the love of God don't tell me you think we need another FPS on the market because I can't tell the difference, the only unique ones are Mass Effect and Bioshock IMO, all the rest are generic miltary shooters IMO.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment