Nintendo stock drops after E3

  • 154 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#151  Edited By AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts
@luxuryheart said:
@jumpaction said:

@AzatiS: You're calling into question the popularity of these games by suggesting the hardware sales don't support the idea. Whereas I believe that exclusives alone do not sell a console and that hardware sales can be impeded simply by the product itself not being compelling. I wouldn't then call into question the popularity of these games like you said:

"So how many really care about Nintendo best games is clearly shown on console sales"

Where I don't really agree with that. I think there is more to a console not selling than brand recognition. Except even in the worst case scenario for Nintendo hardware, the best selling video games on their systems are Nintendo games. Pretty much the only reason anyone buys a Nintendo platform is for a distinctive hardware feature and Nintendo games. :P

That's not something every console manufacturer can claim. The Wii only sold for the Wii remote. Why did people buy a PS2? A cheap DVD player. There is more to hardware sales than exclusive games.

Exactly. Consoles sell for few reasons: hardware, games, and somewhat price. The Xbox 360 was beating the PS3 for a while because they had the same third party games, but the 360 had a better price point. The only reason the PS3 took over in the end was because of Europe, which is attributed to Gran Turismo and Last of Us (this game also did well in America, but not the major point). In that case it was exclusives. At the same time, the PS2 really did well because it was a cheap DVD player. Games like Grand Theft Auto and Gran Turismo also helped since they appealed to casual gamers, but mostly because it was a DVD player.

Same with the Wii for hardware. That's honestly why the Wii succeeded but the N64, GameCube, and Wii U failed. They had the right games since Nintendo games are super popular. I hear about them when I'm just walking by. People talking about Pokemon, people talking about Mario, people making plans to play Mario Kart/Smash. Same way that I would constantly hear about Grand Theft Auto, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Five Nights at Freddy's, and Fortnite. Rant aside, the Wii managed to do well because it offered a different way of playing from the DS. Sure the DS was portable and cheap, but the Wii gave you motion controls and peripherals that weren't possible on the DS. Like, you couldn't use a wheel on the DS for Mario Kart like you did on the Wii. Probably why people preferred the Wii version of Mario Kart over the DS version in that case.

You came with the idea of X amount of people find their Nintendo experiences in handheld therefore consoles sales are not as high which is totally wrong. Thats where the argument stands to.

Get the facts straight and for what point we argue for. I repeat, Gameboy/color didnt affect NES/SNES but they did affect N64 ? Really ? Gamegear didnt affect GENESIS and PSP didnt affect PS2. If PS2 did really well because it was a DVD gets countered by its sales thru the years because that thing was selling deep into PS3 generation. So it did well for its DVD alone ? Think again.

When im saying PS3 did as good as Wii U + GC + N64 combined you coming up with " but handhelds " and when i counter " but handhelds " logic with actual facts and numbers = but PS2 sold because of DVD. Go figure.

PS2 sold because of its hype behind its massive exclusive hits from PS1 era like Tekken, Metal gear solid, Final Fantasy, Silent hill etc as exclusives. Thats what made PS2 instant hit, because fans of those games could find those games on PS only and thats why it sold as much as it did and thats why it kept selling deep into PS3 generation. Period. If few guys left and right bought it as DVD so be it but telling me that was the only reason PS2 became a monster .. rofl!!!

I know because i was there, bought this system early on so hunderd of my friends either in real life or online.

None i know or spoke with, literally none, said to me "i bought PS2 for DVD". Some maybe said DVD is a plus here and there but all we were talking about the games and what is coming. Silent Hill 2 , Final Fantasy 10 etc .. Also i hope you all talking out of experience when you argue with me about PS2 and year 2000 so i hope you werent something like 10 years old or less back then having no clue what you talking about.

This " i bought PS2 because of DVD only " is the biggest joke you can tell yourself if you think majority of PS2 owners bought PS2 for dvd alone. On the other hand i say to you this : Majority of Wii owners bought Wii because of wii mote and motions controls.

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#152  Edited By AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts
@luxuryheart said:

Those GameCube games aren't relevant because people outside of hardcore gamers don't care for them. I've already been over their low sales. The only game you have listed that sold well was Smash. Twilight Princess sold well too, but most of its sells were on the Wii, so meh. Also, Melee isn't the best Smash. It's only said by a minority of Smash fans in the tournament scene who can't move on. Brawl and Smash 4 outsold it and continue to grow, which means that most people aren't hung up on Melee. Smash Ultimate will most likely sell more than Melee. Nintendo fans on the Internet are just as clueless as other fans. They constantly uplift Metroid and F-Zero, when those games in their prime (no pun intended) could never crack 3 million copies sold.

Mario on the Wii sold 30 million copies and Mario Kart on the Wii sold 37 million. I agree to a certain extend that if the console is shitty, then it hampers its ability to sell regardless of games. Like even if the Wii U had GTA V, it would not have made a difference because the console was so bad. Same with exclusives. Especially when they can get them somewhere else. Also, Game Gear was a flop, so meh.

Nintendo games continue to sell. Pokemon sells at least 15 million copies on each system, Mario sells at least 10 million copies, Animal Crossing sells at least 10 million copies, etc. Even Brawl is becoming an S tier game as it has a pattern of selling over 10 million copies lately. That's popular. If Nintendo games can convince 13.5 million people to buy a shitty overpriced console that never got a price cut, then that speaks to the power of those games. That would be like if the PS3 only got a price cut to $500, had no third party games, and managed to still sell 15-25 million systems. It's impressive because the console is selling in unfavorable conditions based on Sony games alone.

You are wrong. Are those games that made Mario an icon and because of those games that you had a Mario movie. Its because of those games theres hype all over the place and because of those icons you can sell MARIO TENNIS or GOLF or SOCCER or you name it. With what you think mario went into every house in USA and became a worldwide icon ? Was NES wasnt it ? What about Zelda ? What about donkey kong, wasnt SNES that made donkey a worldwide hit ?

Here you go again, you just spin the original argument.

I mean, how old are you, did you even gaming back then i wonder !

Listen to yourself, you saying Mario Kart on Wii sold 30M ! Right ? Why Mario Kart on Wii U didnt sell and noone cared about it as much ? Because of handhelds ? Why Mario Kart on Gamecube did sell 4-5 million copies and not 30 ? Because of handhelds ? You get it now ? You trying to defend those pathetic console sales by saying " but but look handheld, people are there " ... but then they werent with Wii right ? They werent with Gameboy, Gamegear and PSP ?

Anyways, facts are up there, this is going nowhere. Beleive what you want. Ill say one last time, handhelds never held consoles back, they do their own thing so defending Nintendo console sales when you see fit wont change the fact that 3 consoles with some of the highest rate games of all time and some of the most iconic Nintendo games ever made sold less than PS3, combined. And if you want to defend this by saying that happened because of handheld gaming, so be it. I disagree.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#153 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38063 Posts

@drummerdave9099 said:
@cainetao11 said:

Yeah it sucks LOL

From $50.45 on June first to $40.95 right now.

Is it detrimental to NTDOY? Nope. But i own it at less than $20. I don't like seeing them lose value. But its a long game. Anyone that owned IBM in the 80's only to see it plummet in the 90s and then recover, knows.

Nothing wrong with holding, just curious why so long? Would have been a great time to sell a year ago when it was so high. Would have seen 150-200% of your investment.

That's assuming I didn't take profits on some.

Avatar image for luxuryheart
LuxuryHeart

2495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#154 LuxuryHeart
Member since 2017 • 2495 Posts
@AzatiS said:
@luxuryheart said:
@jumpaction said:

@AzatiS: You're calling into question the popularity of these games by suggesting the hardware sales don't support the idea. Whereas I believe that exclusives alone do not sell a console and that hardware sales can be impeded simply by the product itself not being compelling. I wouldn't then call into question the popularity of these games like you said:

"So how many really care about Nintendo best games is clearly shown on console sales"

Where I don't really agree with that. I think there is more to a console not selling than brand recognition. Except even in the worst case scenario for Nintendo hardware, the best selling video games on their systems are Nintendo games. Pretty much the only reason anyone buys a Nintendo platform is for a distinctive hardware feature and Nintendo games. :P

That's not something every console manufacturer can claim. The Wii only sold for the Wii remote. Why did people buy a PS2? A cheap DVD player. There is more to hardware sales than exclusive games.

Exactly. Consoles sell for few reasons: hardware, games, and somewhat price. The Xbox 360 was beating the PS3 for a while because they had the same third party games, but the 360 had a better price point. The only reason the PS3 took over in the end was because of Europe, which is attributed to Gran Turismo and Last of Us (this game also did well in America, but not the major point). In that case it was exclusives. At the same time, the PS2 really did well because it was a cheap DVD player. Games like Grand Theft Auto and Gran Turismo also helped since they appealed to casual gamers, but mostly because it was a DVD player.

Same with the Wii for hardware. That's honestly why the Wii succeeded but the N64, GameCube, and Wii U failed. They had the right games since Nintendo games are super popular. I hear about them when I'm just walking by. People talking about Pokemon, people talking about Mario, people making plans to play Mario Kart/Smash. Same way that I would constantly hear about Grand Theft Auto, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Five Nights at Freddy's, and Fortnite. Rant aside, the Wii managed to do well because it offered a different way of playing from the DS. Sure the DS was portable and cheap, but the Wii gave you motion controls and peripherals that weren't possible on the DS. Like, you couldn't use a wheel on the DS for Mario Kart like you did on the Wii. Probably why people preferred the Wii version of Mario Kart over the DS version in that case.

You came with the idea of X amount of people find their Nintendo experiences in handheld therefore consoles sales are not as high which is totally wrong. Thats where the argument stands to.

Get the facts straight and for what point we argue for. I repeat, Gameboy/color didnt affect NES/SNES but they did affect N64 ? Really ? Gamegear didnt affect GENESIS and PSP didnt affect PS2. If PS2 did really well because it was a DVD gets countered by its sales thru the years because that thing was selling deep into PS3 generation. So it did well for its DVD alone ? Think again.

When im saying PS3 did as good as Wii U + GC + N64 combined you coming up with " but handhelds " and when i counter " but handhelds " logic with actual facts and numbers = but PS2 sold because of DVD. Go figure.

PS2 sold because of its hype behind its massive exclusive hits from PS1 era like Tekken, Metal gear solid, Final Fantasy, Silent hill etc as exclusives. Thats what made PS2 instant hit, because fans of those games could find those games on PS only and thats why it sold as much as it did and thats why it kept selling deep into PS3 generation. Period. If few guys left and right bought it as DVD so be it but telling me that was the only reason PS2 became a monster .. rofl!!!

I know because i was there, bought this system early on so hunderd of my friends either in real life or online.

None i know or spoke with, literally none, said to me "i bought PS2 for DVD". Some maybe said DVD is a plus here and there but all we were talking about the games and what is coming. Silent Hill 2 , Final Fantasy 10 etc .. Also i hope you all talking out of experience when you argue with me about PS2 and year 2000 so i hope you werent something like 10 years old or less back then having no clue what you talking about.

This " i bought PS2 because of DVD only " is the biggest joke you can tell yourself if you think majority of PS2 owners bought PS2 for dvd alone. On the other hand i say to you this : Majority of Wii owners bought Wii because of wii mote and motions controls.

The NES came out like 6 years before the Game Boy, so it wasn't affected by it at all. That's like if Sony released a handheld in 2019. Also, the SNES was competing with the Sega Genesis. That was around the time when Nintendo moved away from families and casual gamers, explains the lower sales, to appeal to the hardcore teenage boys. The Game Boy was for everyone, hence the higher sales. Basically, the SNES sold based on graphics, IP, and third party. The Game Boy didn't have much third party support, yet it still sold more than the SNES.

The PS3 did not sell near as much as the PS2. Even when Sony spent billions securing exclusives and lost profit slashing the price of the thing, they still came in second place and didn't get anywhere close to the PS2 or even PS1.

If you hang around gamers, then the conversation is going to be different. Like I hung around all types of people. My brothers were gamers and influenced me. I also had some cousins who only had the PS2 because they could play GTA San Andreas and have Madden 'tournaments'. Some of my family members only got it to watch movies on, which explains the inflated sales.

I agree with the last part. I even said that if the Wii didn't have a different way of playing compared to the DS, ala motion controls, then it would not have sold well at all. Nintendo games are still popular because quite a few of them sold over 5 million copies on the Wii. Still, the motion controls gave them a reason to get a separate console and experience them in a different way. You could not play Mario Kart on the DS with a wheel, and that made a difference.

Avatar image for bigfootpart2
bigfootpart2

1131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 bigfootpart2
Member since 2013 • 1131 Posts

I'm glad I sold my Switch. Nintendo blew their load with BotW and Mario, and now it's basically a dead system.