Non-gamers and Casuals harming Gaming?

  • 127 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for redCloudJ7
redCloudJ7

1004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 redCloudJ7
Member since 2007 • 1004 Posts

Has this been brought up at all?  

I have heard people claim that too many non-gamer and casual consumers can actually harm the industry.   By causing more developers to make games that appeal to these groups.  Instead of focusing and creating new original properties for the hardcore groups. Causing the majority of developers to focus on the non-gamer and casual consumers. The major franchises (that sell very well)  for the hardcore would be intact. However the majority of  games would be "dumbed" down making them more accessible to non-gamers and casuals. And developers would neglect the hardcore groups in order a to secure greater profit.

What do think about this?

Is this true?

Avatar image for Basinboy
Basinboy

14560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#2 Basinboy
Member since 2003 • 14560 Posts

In that sense, yes, casuals would be harming the industry.  Whenever you sacrifice quality in order to make a profit, you completely betray your niche userbase, which is ultimatley detrimental.

Avatar image for midnite_toker22
midnite_toker22

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 midnite_toker22
Member since 2006 • 379 Posts

No

its threads like these that are harming gaming

Avatar image for thegame458
thegame458

1326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#4 thegame458
Member since 2006 • 1326 Posts
I don't think this is true because there are so much gamers in the world, and when it comes to gaming, choices are so diverse that hardcore gaming will always be alive. It is very far from saying that casual gamers are most of the gamers in the world. Casuals usually become more and more open on hardcore gaming throughout. So I doubt that is true at all.
Avatar image for Mizuke
Mizuke

1159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Mizuke
Member since 2005 • 1159 Posts
I say we let EA deal with the casuals.
Avatar image for BloodTorment1
BloodTorment1

2580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 BloodTorment1
Member since 2005 • 2580 Posts

No

its threads like these that are harming gaming

midnite_toker22

T3H THR3ADS OF Ev1l!!!!!!!111!!!!1on3!

Avatar image for poopinloop32
poopinloop32

4949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 poopinloop32
Member since 2006 • 4949 Posts
yes
example:SSX Blur...a game that many casuals liked and enjoyed but was obvisouly casualed down for sales
Example2:Oblivion=way waterd down version of morrowind
Avatar image for whoisryanmack
whoisryanmack

7675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 whoisryanmack
Member since 2006 • 7675 Posts
yes. casuals dont demand as much out of the industry as hardcores. it will be reduced to pumping out mindless crap that sells well. eventually, you get a crash when everyone stops caring.
Avatar image for Cpt_Meh
Cpt_Meh

1832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Cpt_Meh
Member since 2005 • 1832 Posts
Uh, Casuals are a much more vast market than so called "hardcore gamers". $$$ makes the world go round.
Avatar image for redCloudJ7
redCloudJ7

1004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 redCloudJ7
Member since 2007 • 1004 Posts

No

its threads like these that are harming gaming

midnite_toker22
How am I harming gaming? My post has no adverse effect on gaming. And could you please explain your opinion. And why you feel the way you do?
Avatar image for ArisShadows
ArisShadows

22784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 ArisShadows
Member since 2004 • 22784 Posts

Has this been brought up at all?  

I have heard people claim that too many non-gamer and casual consumers can actually harm the industry.   By causing more developers to make games that appeal to these groups.  Instead of focusing and creating new original properties for the hardcore groups. Causing the majority of developers to focus on the non-gamer and casual consumers. The major franchises (that sell very well)  for the hardcore would be intact. However the majority of  games would be "dumbed" down making them more accessible to non-gamers and casuals. And developers would neglect the hardcore groups in order a to secure greater profit.

What do think about this?

Is this true?

redCloudJ7

Perhaps videos games will be a widen experience, not only that so called hardcore but everyone else. Instead of being a voodoo or something overlooked being childish or a waste to the outside world, it could become something much bigger for everyone to be cultured in, whether its the gamers of the past or new inviduals, maybe nongamers won't be a term as much. Perhaps it will be like this, video games will be like music, enjoyed by all, but never the sameto each other, various tastes and types. From simple fun games to challenging puzzle-like one to the typical shooter, loved and played by not a certian group but by all. Gamers evolved.
Avatar image for BigDizz
BigDizz

2592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#12 BigDizz
Member since 2004 • 2592 Posts

To a certain extent....

Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts
Hardcore gamers hurt too. Their attitude towards gaming being only for them tends to keep people from getting into gaming...which in turn hurts everyone.

But, the idea that casual games (like puzzels or mini-games) ruleing the market is silly. The fact is that those types of games already rule the market on PC's and cell phones and mobile games. Still, GeoW has no problem selling multi-million copies. The fact is that there will always be a market for adventure or narrative or epic gaming.
Avatar image for Random__Guy
Random__Guy

1047

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Random__Guy
Member since 2007 • 1047 Posts
I'm sure most game company's have some kind of quality control and would not allow hordes of crap to be released.
Avatar image for JiveT
JiveT

8619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 JiveT
Member since 2005 • 8619 Posts
Its a business so they want as many customers as possible. The more systems sold the more chance their is to make a profit, the more variety you will see...at least in theory. I'm upset with what Nintendo is doing. It could backfire and sink the whole industry like back in the 2600 days. SMG could be the next ET. Fire could rain from the sky thrown from the tongues of giant flame toads.
Avatar image for Gamer46
Gamer46

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 315

User Lists: 0

#16 Gamer46
Member since 2003 • 11304 Posts
They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers.  If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc.  It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.
Avatar image for coolguy1111
coolguy1111

3991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#17 coolguy1111
Member since 2005 • 3991 Posts
I say we let EA deal with the casuals.Mizuke
EA has made alot of hardcore games. more then UBIsoft, which all they do is dumb down or wreck games.
Avatar image for Gamer46
Gamer46

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 315

User Lists: 0

#18 Gamer46
Member since 2003 • 11304 Posts
Hardcore gamers hurt too. Their attitude towards gaming being only for them tends to keep people from getting into gaming...which in turn hurts everyone.

But, the idea that casual games (like puzzels or mini-games) ruleing the market is silly. The fact is that those types of games already rule the market on PC's and cell phones and mobile games. Still, GeoW has no problem selling multi-million copies. The fact is that there will always be a market for adventure or narrative or epic gaming.
goblaa


Nope, because if the Wii wins, Sony and MS will follow Nintendo's lead as well.  They'll stop pushing epic games and start asking developers to give them some trashy Nintendogs clone to try and be the next big thing.
Avatar image for coolguy1111
coolguy1111

3991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#19 coolguy1111
Member since 2005 • 3991 Posts
Casual gamers, have wrecked the wii, which had potential to be a great system, looks like it will be filed with brain age, Wii Sports, and other pretty lame games.
Avatar image for ArisShadows
ArisShadows

22784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 ArisShadows
Member since 2004 • 22784 Posts
They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers.  If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc.  It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.Gamer46
Wrong.
Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts
Your also assuming that game developers get into their job for the money. Which is laughable since game developers tend to make next to nothing. Your assuming that everyone will sell-out and that no developer is making games because it's their passion.

If developers just wanted to make a quick buck, they would have gotten into insurence.
Avatar image for redCloudJ7
redCloudJ7

1004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 redCloudJ7
Member since 2007 • 1004 Posts
[QUOTE="redCloudJ7"]

Has this been brought up at all?  

I have heard people claim that too many non-gamer and casual consumers can actually harm the industry.   By causing more developers to make games that appeal to these groups.  Instead of focusing and creating new original properties for the hardcore groups. Causing the majority of developers to focus on the non-gamer and casual consumers. The major franchises (that sell very well)  for the hardcore would be intact. However the majority of  games would be "dumbed" down making them more accessible to non-gamers and casuals. And developers would neglect the hardcore groups in order a to secure greater profit.

What do think about this?

Is this true?

ArisShadows

Perhaps videos games will be a widen experience, not only that so called hardcore but everyone else. Instead of being a voodoo or something overlooked being childish or a waste to the outside world, it could become something much bigger for everyone to be cultured in, whether its the gamers of the past or new inviduals, maybe nongamers won't be a term as much. Perhaps it will be like this, video games will be like music, enjoyed by all, but never the sameto each other, various tastes and types. From simple fun games to challenging puzzle-like one to the typical shooter, loved and played by not a certian group but by all. Gamers evolved.

That sounds nice. But won't a majority of the developers aim for the largest group and try to make the biggest profit. Either way someone is going to get neglected. There won't be a equal balance.
Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts
[QUOTE="goblaa"]Hardcore gamers hurt too. Their attitude towards gaming being only for them tends to keep people from getting into gaming...which in turn hurts everyone.

But, the idea that casual games (like puzzels or mini-games) ruleing the market is silly. The fact is that those types of games already rule the market on PC's and cell phones and mobile games. Still, GeoW has no problem selling multi-million copies. The fact is that there will always be a market for adventure or narrative or epic gaming.
Gamer46


Nope, because if the Wii wins, Sony and MS will follow Nintendo's lead as well. They'll stop pushing epic games and start asking developers to give them some trashy Nintendogs clone to try and be the next big thing.


Since when did Sony and MS get to tell developers what games that have to make?
Avatar image for coolguy1111
coolguy1111

3991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 coolguy1111
Member since 2005 • 3991 Posts
[QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.ArisShadows
Wrong.

Yea because nintendogs and cooking mama and brain age is good fro video games?? Yea, sure.
Avatar image for Gamer46
Gamer46

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 315

User Lists: 0

#25 Gamer46
Member since 2003 • 11304 Posts
[QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.ArisShadows
Wrong.



Miyamoto basically confirmed it in his speech and Nintendo has basically been saying it for the past year.  Nintendo does not want epic games, they want simple, pick up and play trashy mini-game compilations.  They don't want games like GTA to exist, instead they're hope is that everybody plays something like Mario Party.
Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts
[QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.coolguy1111
Wrong.

Yea because nintendogs and cooking mama and brain age is good fro video games?? Yea, sure.


Can you tell us why? Or are they just not good for YOU because you too much of a coolguy?
Avatar image for ArisShadows
ArisShadows

22784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 ArisShadows
Member since 2004 • 22784 Posts
[QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="redCloudJ7"]

Has this been brought up at all?  

I have heard people claim that too many non-gamer and casual consumers can actually harm the industry.   By causing more developers to make games that appeal to these groups.  Instead of focusing and creating new original properties for the hardcore groups. Causing the majority of developers to focus on the non-gamer and casual consumers. The major franchises (that sell very well)  for the hardcore would be intact. However the majority of  games would be "dumbed" down making them more accessible to non-gamers and casuals. And developers would neglect the hardcore groups in order a to secure greater profit.

What do think about this?

Is this true?

redCloudJ7

Perhaps videos games will be a widen experience, not only that so called hardcore but everyone else. Instead of being a voodoo or something overlooked being childish or a waste to the outside world, it could become something much bigger for everyone to be cultured in, whether its the gamers of the past or new inviduals, maybe nongamers won't be a term as much. Perhaps it will be like this, video games will be like music, enjoyed by all, but never the sameto each other, various tastes and types. From simple fun games to challenging puzzle-like one to the typical shooter, loved and played by not a certian group but by all. Gamers evolved.

That sounds nice. But won't a majority of the developers aim for the largest group and try to make the biggest profit. Either way someone is going to get neglected. There won't be a equal balance.

What is better? Make one type of game of whichever side, and gain one side of the money source, or do both and gain both sides and make more, bring in more new gamers. Someone gets into it, likes the simple stuff and starts to get into heavy and heavy stuff. Its like anything, music, anime, etc., you start out light and work your way down.
Avatar image for Gamer46
Gamer46

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 315

User Lists: 0

#28 Gamer46
Member since 2003 • 11304 Posts
[QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.coolguy1111
Wrong.

Yea because nintendogs and cooking mama and brain age is good fro video games?? Yea, sure.



Exactly, it's too bad Nintendo fanboys are too blind to see the error of Nintendo's ways here.
Avatar image for Random__Guy
Random__Guy

1047

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Random__Guy
Member since 2007 • 1047 Posts
It doesn't really matter, it might blow up like atari but in the end it keeps on going..
Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts
[QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.Gamer46
Wrong.



Miyamoto basically confirmed it in his speech and Nintendo has basically been saying it for the past year. Nintendo does not want epic games, they want simple, pick up and play trashy mini-game compilations. They don't want games like GTA to exist, instead they're hope is that everybody plays something like Mario Party.


What confrence were you watching? I hate to break it to you, but those 'trashy' mini games are a blast to play. Some people may not like the same kind of games you do (shocker). The problem is that there is a big market of people for those games and NO ONE was making them for consoles. So the vast majority of the world was pretty much being told by game developers "screw you".

Nintendo is expanding, sure....but you act as if metroid, zelda, and mario will cese to exist. Or that every dev in the world will stop making the games they love.
Avatar image for Gamer46
Gamer46

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 315

User Lists: 0

#31 Gamer46
Member since 2003 • 11304 Posts
[QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.goblaa
Wrong.

Yea because nintendogs and cooking mama and brain age is good fro video games?? Yea, sure.


Can you tell us why? Or are they just not good for YOU because you too much of a coolguy?



Those games don't deliver awesome gaming experiences like a deep game like RE, or FF can, that's a fact.
Avatar image for redCloudJ7
redCloudJ7

1004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 redCloudJ7
Member since 2007 • 1004 Posts
Hardcore gamers hurt too. Their attitude towards gaming being only for them tends to keep people from getting into gaming...which in turn hurts everyone.

But, the idea that casual games (like puzzels or mini-games) ruleing the market is silly. The fact is that those types of games already rule the market on PC's and cell phones and mobile games. Still, GeoW has no problem selling multi-million copies. The fact is that there will always be a market for adventure or narrative or epic gaming.
goblaa
Who said hardcore gamers have the attitude that gaming is only for them? How is it a silly idea that casual games rule the market? I agree that any extreme is not good for gaming.
Avatar image for coolguy1111
coolguy1111

3991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#33 coolguy1111
Member since 2005 • 3991 Posts
[QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.goblaa
Wrong.

Yea because nintendogs and cooking mama and brain age is good fro video games?? Yea, sure.


Can you tell us why? Or are they just not good for YOU because you too much of a coolguy?

Firstly, its fairly obvious why they are wrecking it, there taking sales and potential games away from us, there overshadowing games that deserve to be getting hype, and it is YOU that needs to prove to me how they help the gaming market. You cant say it mkaes more money or expands the market, because developers making money on a game that takes a month to make and isnt innovating or moving gaming foward, while publishers like Epic, Blizzard, and ID had to struggle to survive(before blizzard made WoW, and epic sold itself to the devil), is good for gaming? I like it when Brain Age is getting talked about more then Crysis, something that will move the fps genre foward, change gaming, is getting overshadow by some simple, same old, basic, takes a month to make, game.
Avatar image for coolguy1111
coolguy1111

3991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#34 coolguy1111
Member since 2005 • 3991 Posts
[QUOTE="goblaa"][QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.Gamer46
Wrong.

Yea because nintendogs and cooking mama and brain age is good fro video games?? Yea, sure.


Can you tell us why? Or are they just not good for YOU because you too much of a coolguy?



Those games don't deliver awesome gaming experiences like a deep game like RE, or FF can, that's a fact.

And they sell more, take away hype from games like that, and overshadow it alot of times. Hurray big Brain for wii announced!! Its the same thing as the one for ds!! Hurray!! We get to play a trivia game which you can get for free online.
Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts
[QUOTE="goblaa"][QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.Gamer46
Wrong.

Yea because nintendogs and cooking mama and brain age is good fro video games?? Yea, sure.


Can you tell us why? Or are they just not good for YOU because you too much of a coolguy?



Those games don't deliver awesome gaming experiences like a deep game like RE, or FF can, that's a fact.


So all gaming should be about long winded stories and dramatic experiance. And all other forms of entertainment should be banned?

I got a great amazing experience from Warioware. The experience of joy and laughter. That game is gut busting. I also got great experience from shadow of the colossus for completly opposite reasons. I'm a  gamer. I can appreciate a game for what it is, not weither it follows some arbitrary rule about what makes a game acceptable.
Avatar image for redCloudJ7
redCloudJ7

1004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 redCloudJ7
Member since 2007 • 1004 Posts
Your also assuming that game developers get into their job for the money. Which is laughable since game developers tend to make next to nothing. Your assuming that everyone will sell-out and that no developer is making games because it's their passion.

If developers just wanted to make a quick buck, they would have gotten into insurence.
goblaa
The world runs on money. What makes you think the gaming industry is any different? If money wasn't a concern why would they make multiplat games? Sure there will be a few developers that will still make games because they have a passion for it. But the majority.........
Avatar image for Gamer46
Gamer46

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 315

User Lists: 0

#37 Gamer46
Member since 2003 • 11304 Posts
[QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.goblaa
Wrong.



Miyamoto basically confirmed it in his speech and Nintendo has basically been saying it for the past year. Nintendo does not want epic games, they want simple, pick up and play trashy mini-game compilations. They don't want games like GTA to exist, instead they're hope is that everybody plays something like Mario Party.


What confrence were you watching? I hate to break it to you, but those 'trashy' mini games are a blast to play. Some people may not like the same kind of games you do (shocker). The problem is that there is a big market of people for those games and NO ONE was making them for consoles. So the vast majority of the world was pretty much being told by game developers "screw you".

Nintendo is expanding, sure....but you act as if metroid, zelda, and mario will cese to exist. Or that every dev in the world will stop making the games they love.



And there lies the problem.  Nintendo may keep Mario, Zelda, and Metroid around, but if you look at their new franchises, it's casual crap, they're not trying to make new epic adventures, instead they're giving us mini-games.  Now yes, they can be fun when playing games with friends, but sometimes I like to play single player games as well, and I don't see Nintendo pushing for great RPGs or Adventures.  They'll give us the standard fare to keep fanboys happy, but when it comes to original content, don't look for a new platformer.  And yes, if the Wii takes off, developers will start avoiding the gamers too in favor of following the dollar.  Don't give me this "game developers don't get paid a lot, so they're just in it for what they love" garbage either.  Everybody in any industry tries to make as much money as possible.  Once the market for stuff like MGS, FF, and Gears of War dries up because the overwhelming majority of people buying games are buying crap like Cooking Mama, you will see much more simplistic games.  There is no middle ground.  Cooking Mama, Wario Ware and the like can not co-exist with FPS or RPGs.
Avatar image for ArisShadows
ArisShadows

22784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 ArisShadows
Member since 2004 • 22784 Posts
[QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="goblaa"][QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.coolguy1111
Wrong.

Yea because nintendogs and cooking mama and brain age is good fro video games?? Yea, sure.


Can you tell us why? Or are they just not good for YOU because you too much of a coolguy?



Those games don't deliver awesome gaming experiences like a deep game like RE, or FF can, that's a fact.

And they sell more, take away hype from games like that, and overshadow it alot of times. Hurray big Brain for wii announced!! Its the same thing as the one for ds!! Hurray!! We get to play a trivia game which you can get for free online.

Yes, you like opimion always equal fact. Oh because I like RE or FF so much that someone can have an "awesome experience" with a game like Nintendogs.
Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts
[QUOTE="goblaa"]Your also assuming that game developers get into their job for the money. Which is laughable since game developers tend to make next to nothing. Your assuming that everyone will sell-out and that no developer is making games because it's their passion.

If developers just wanted to make a quick buck, they would have gotten into insurence.
redCloudJ7
The world runs on money. What makes you think the gaming industry is any different? If money wasn't a concern why would they make multiplat games? Sure there will be a few developers that will still make games because they have a passion for it. But the majority.........


You have absaluotly nothing to base that off of. You're just assuming.
Avatar image for coolguy1111
coolguy1111

3991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#40 coolguy1111
Member since 2005 • 3991 Posts
[QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="goblaa"][QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.ArisShadows
Wrong.

Yea because nintendogs and cooking mama and brain age is good fro video games?? Yea, sure.


Can you tell us why? Or are they just not good for YOU because you too much of a coolguy?



Those games don't deliver awesome gaming experiences like a deep game like RE, or FF can, that's a fact.

And they sell more, take away hype from games like that, and overshadow it alot of times. Hurray big Brain for wii announced!! Its the same thing as the one for ds!! Hurray!! We get to play a trivia game which you can get for free online.

Yes, you like opimion always equal fact. Oh because I like RE or FF so much that someone can have an "awesome experience" with a game like Nintendogs.

So you like the fact nintendogs sold 6-8x more then UT04?
Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts
[QUOTE="goblaa"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.Gamer46
Wrong.



Miyamoto basically confirmed it in his speech and Nintendo has basically been saying it for the past year. Nintendo does not want epic games, they want simple, pick up and play trashy mini-game compilations. They don't want games like GTA to exist, instead they're hope is that everybody plays something like Mario Party.


What confrence were you watching? I hate to break it to you, but those 'trashy' mini games are a blast to play. Some people may not like the same kind of games you do (shocker). The problem is that there is a big market of people for those games and NO ONE was making them for consoles. So the vast majority of the world was pretty much being told by game developers "screw you".

Nintendo is expanding, sure....but you act as if metroid, zelda, and mario will cese to exist. Or that every dev in the world will stop making the games they love.



And there lies the problem. Nintendo may keep Mario, Zelda, and Metroid around, but if you look at their new franchises, it's casual crap, they're not trying to make new epic adventures, instead they're giving us mini-games. Now yes, they can be fun when playing games with friends, but sometimes I like to play single player games as well, and I don't see Nintendo pushing for great RPGs or Adventures. They'll give us the standard fare to keep fanboys happy, but when it comes to original content, don't look for a new platformer. And yes, if the Wii takes off, developers will start avoiding the gamers too in favor of following the dollar. Don't give me this "game developers don't get paid a lot, so they're just in it for what they love" garbage either. Everybody in any industry tries to make as much money as possible. Once the market for stuff like MGS, FF, and Gears of War dries up because the overwhelming majority of people buying games are buying crap like Cooking Mama, you will see much more simplistic games. There is no middle ground. Cooking Mama, Wario Ware and the like can not co-exist with FPS or RPGs.


Why would the millions of people buying games like GeoW simply stop buying those kinds of games?
Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts
[QUOTE="goblaa"][QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.coolguy1111
Wrong.

Yea because nintendogs and cooking mama and brain age is good fro video games?? Yea, sure.


Can you tell us why? Or are they just not good for YOU because you too much of a coolguy?

Firstly, its fairly obvious why they are wrecking it, there taking sales and potential games away from us, there overshadowing games that deserve to be getting hype, and it is YOU that needs to prove to me how they help the gaming market. You cant say it mkaes more money or expands the market, because developers making money on a game that takes a month to make and isnt innovating or moving gaming foward, while publishers like Epic, Blizzard, and ID had to struggle to survive(before blizzard made WoW, and epic sold itself to the devil), is good for gaming? I like it when Brain Age is getting talked about more then Crysis, something that will move the fps genre foward, change gaming, is getting overshadow by some simple, same old, basic, takes a month to make, game.


Why would crysis be overshadowed? That game is going to be huge in the FPS community.
Avatar image for Gamer46
Gamer46

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 315

User Lists: 0

#43 Gamer46
Member since 2003 • 11304 Posts
[QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="goblaa"][QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.goblaa
Wrong.

Yea because nintendogs and cooking mama and brain age is good fro video games?? Yea, sure.


Can you tell us why? Or are they just not good for YOU because you too much of a coolguy?



Those games don't deliver awesome gaming experiences like a deep game like RE, or FF can, that's a fact.


So all gaming should be about long winded stories and dramatic experiance. And all other forms of entertainment should be banned?

I got a great amazing experience from Warioware. The experience of joy and laughter. That game is gut busting. I also got great experience from shadow of the colossus for completly opposite reasons. I'm a gamer. I can appreciate a game for what it is, not weither it follows some arbitrary rule about what makes a game acceptable.



I'm not saying anything should be avoided, heck I enjoyed Rayman Raving Rabbids at the Wii launch parties we had in my dorm.  But I don't want these games becoming the norm because if they do it will cause developers to start avoiding making stuff like Mass Effect.  A game like Rayman is simple and inexpensive to make, and if it can get a quick buck that's what developers will go after.  Games like Mass Effect take much more time and money to make and if games like Rayman are selling tons developers are going to figure it's not worth their while to make a longer game when they can get away with going the cheap route.
Avatar image for poopinloop32
poopinloop32

4949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 poopinloop32
Member since 2006 • 4949 Posts
im rooting for coolguy on this one..hes the underdog in this arguement
Avatar image for Gamer46
Gamer46

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 315

User Lists: 0

#45 Gamer46
Member since 2003 • 11304 Posts
[QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="goblaa"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.goblaa
Wrong.



Miyamoto basically confirmed it in his speech and Nintendo has basically been saying it for the past year. Nintendo does not want epic games, they want simple, pick up and play trashy mini-game compilations. They don't want games like GTA to exist, instead they're hope is that everybody plays something like Mario Party.


What confrence were you watching? I hate to break it to you, but those 'trashy' mini games are a blast to play. Some people may not like the same kind of games you do (shocker). The problem is that there is a big market of people for those games and NO ONE was making them for consoles. So the vast majority of the world was pretty much being told by game developers "screw you".

Nintendo is expanding, sure....but you act as if metroid, zelda, and mario will cese to exist. Or that every dev in the world will stop making the games they love.



And there lies the problem. Nintendo may keep Mario, Zelda, and Metroid around, but if you look at their new franchises, it's casual crap, they're not trying to make new epic adventures, instead they're giving us mini-games. Now yes, they can be fun when playing games with friends, but sometimes I like to play single player games as well, and I don't see Nintendo pushing for great RPGs or Adventures. They'll give us the standard fare to keep fanboys happy, but when it comes to original content, don't look for a new platformer. And yes, if the Wii takes off, developers will start avoiding the gamers too in favor of following the dollar. Don't give me this "game developers don't get paid a lot, so they're just in it for what they love" garbage either. Everybody in any industry tries to make as much money as possible. Once the market for stuff like MGS, FF, and Gears of War dries up because the overwhelming majority of people buying games are buying crap like Cooking Mama, you will see much more simplistic games. There is no middle ground. Cooking Mama, Wario Ware and the like can not co-exist with FPS or RPGs.


Why would the millions of people buying games like GeoW simply stop buying those kinds of games?



Because developers will stop making them.  Simple logic really.
Avatar image for redCloudJ7
redCloudJ7

1004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 redCloudJ7
Member since 2007 • 1004 Posts
[QUOTE="redCloudJ7"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="redCloudJ7"]

Has this been brought up at all?  

I have heard people claim that too many non-gamer and casual consumers can actually harm the industry.   By causing more developers to make games that appeal to these groups.  Instead of focusing and creating new original properties for the hardcore groups. Causing the majority of developers to focus on the non-gamer and casual consumers. The major franchises (that sell very well)  for the hardcore would be intact. However the majority of  games would be "dumbed" down making them more accessible to non-gamers and casuals. And developers would neglect the hardcore groups in order a to secure greater profit.

What do think about this?

Is this true?

ArisShadows

Perhaps videos games will be a widen experience, not only that so called hardcore but everyone else. Instead of being a voodoo or something overlooked being childish or a waste to the outside world, it could become something much bigger for everyone to be cultured in, whether its the gamers of the past or new inviduals, maybe nongamers won't be a term as much. Perhaps it will be like this, video games will be like music, enjoyed by all, but never the sameto each other, various tastes and types. From simple fun games to challenging puzzle-like one to the typical shooter, loved and played by not a certian group but by all. Gamers evolved.

That sounds nice. But won't a majority of the developers aim for the largest group and try to make the biggest profit. Either way someone is going to get neglected. There won't be a equal balance.

What is better? Make one type of game of whichever side, and gain one side of the money source, or do both and gain both sides and make more, bring in more new gamers. Someone gets into it, likes the simple stuff and starts to get into heavy and heavy stuff. Its like anything, music, anime, etc., you start out light and work your way down.

It would be nice to have a balance. But it's not realisitc. Not everone will move into the 'heavy stuff". A majority of casual non-gamers gamers probably won't move into the "heavy stuff". Some people simply don't have the time to get invested into the "heavy stuff". They want something that is short quick and entertaining.
Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts
[QUOTE="goblaa"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="goblaa"][QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.Gamer46
Wrong.

Yea because nintendogs and cooking mama and brain age is good fro video games?? Yea, sure.


Can you tell us why? Or are they just not good for YOU because you too much of a coolguy?



Those games don't deliver awesome gaming experiences like a deep game like RE, or FF can, that's a fact.


So all gaming should be about long winded stories and dramatic experiance. And all other forms of entertainment should be banned?

I got a great amazing experience from Warioware. The experience of joy and laughter. That game is gut busting. I also got great experience from shadow of the colossus for completly opposite reasons. I'm a gamer. I can appreciate a game for what it is, not weither it follows some arbitrary rule about what makes a game acceptable.



I'm not saying anything should be avoided, heck I enjoyed Rayman Raving Rabbids at the Wii launch parties we had in my dorm. But I don't want these games becoming the norm because if they do it will cause developers to start avoiding making stuff like Mass Effect. A game like Rayman is simple and inexpensive to make, and if it can get a quick buck that's what developers will go after. Games like Mass Effect take much more time and money to make and if games like Rayman are selling tons developers are going to figure it's not worth their while to make a longer game when they can get away with going the cheap route.


But how is that any diffirent hen the way things have been for the last 10 years? more people play the sims, 50cent bullet proof, true crimes and other crap like that. Still, whay stop making epic games that sell millions of copies?
Avatar image for shaggymcp
shaggymcp

2896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 shaggymcp
Member since 2003 • 2896 Posts

Has this been brought up at all?  

I have heard people claim that too many non-gamer and casual consumers can actually harm the industry.   By causing more developers to make games that appeal to these groups.  Instead of focusing and creating new original properties for the hardcore groups. Causing the majority of developers to focus on the non-gamer and casual consumers. The major franchises (that sell very well)  for the hardcore would be intact. However the majority of  games would be "dumbed" down making them more accessible to non-gamers and casuals. And developers would neglect the hardcore groups in order a to secure greater profit.

What do think about this?

Is this true?

redCloudJ7

I agree 100%,  Look @ what casual's have done to Nintendo....   The wii will be the first Nintendo system I am going to skip, thx to casual's and lame controls.  Could you imagine if they dumbed down a game like Ninja Gaiden for ps3...... or Halo 3 for the Xbox 360 to "make it more appealing" to casuals..... I would quit console gaming.

Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts
[QUOTE="goblaa"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="goblaa"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]They are harming gaming, especially the non-gamers. If the Wii continues it's current run of success games like Cooking Mama, and Nintendogs become the main focus of developers, killing off stuff like MGS, God of War, FF, GTA, RE, etc. It's said, but this is where Nintendo wants to take the market.Gamer46
Wrong.



Miyamoto basically confirmed it in his speech and Nintendo has basically been saying it for the past year. Nintendo does not want epic games, they want simple, pick up and play trashy mini-game compilations. They don't want games like GTA to exist, instead they're hope is that everybody plays something like Mario Party.


What confrence were you watching? I hate to break it to you, but those 'trashy' mini games are a blast to play. Some people may not like the same kind of games you do (shocker). The problem is that there is a big market of people for those games and NO ONE was making them for consoles. So the vast majority of the world was pretty much being told by game developers "screw you".

Nintendo is expanding, sure....but you act as if metroid, zelda, and mario will cese to exist. Or that every dev in the world will stop making the games they love.



And there lies the problem. Nintendo may keep Mario, Zelda, and Metroid around, but if you look at their new franchises, it's casual crap, they're not trying to make new epic adventures, instead they're giving us mini-games. Now yes, they can be fun when playing games with friends, but sometimes I like to play single player games as well, and I don't see Nintendo pushing for great RPGs or Adventures. They'll give us the standard fare to keep fanboys happy, but when it comes to original content, don't look for a new platformer. And yes, if the Wii takes off, developers will start avoiding the gamers too in favor of following the dollar. Don't give me this "game developers don't get paid a lot, so they're just in it for what they love" garbage either. Everybody in any industry tries to make as much money as possible. Once the market for stuff like MGS, FF, and Gears of War dries up because the overwhelming majority of people buying games are buying crap like Cooking Mama, you will see much more simplistic games. There is no middle ground. Cooking Mama, Wario Ware and the like can not co-exist with FPS or RPGs.


Why would the millions of people buying games like GeoW simply stop buying those kinds of games?



Because developers will stop making them. Simple logic really.


Wow, you might as just well said "Because I said so".
Avatar image for poopinloop32
poopinloop32

4949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 poopinloop32
Member since 2006 • 4949 Posts
[QUOTE="redCloudJ7"]

Has this been brought up at all?  

I have heard people claim that too many non-gamer and casual consumers can actually harm the industry.   By causing more developers to make games that appeal to these groups.  Instead of focusing and creating new original properties for the hardcore groups. Causing the majority of developers to focus on the non-gamer and casual consumers. The major franchises (that sell very well)  for the hardcore would be intact. However the majority of  games would be "dumbed" down making them more accessible to non-gamers and casuals. And developers would neglect the hardcore groups in order a to secure greater profit.

What do think about this?

Is this true?

shaggymcp

I agree 100%,  Look @ what casual's have done to Nintendo....   The wii will be the first Nintendo system I am going to skip, thx to casual's and lame controls.  Could you imagine if they dumbed down a game like Ninja Gaiden for ps3...... or Halo 3 for the Xbox 360 to "make it more appealing" to casuals..... I would quit console gaming.

thats what i promised long ago..if all consoles focus on casuals..im going back to PC gaming