NPD Analyst: 75% of gamers prefer a boxed product

  • 170 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

In other words, the suit would look like this:

Game Corp. + Shareholders v. Renegade Corporate Officer

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#102 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Do you not understand the concept of "personal liability"? The corporate officer is being sued personally. I.e., they're going after his own money in his bank account. It's not the corporation that is being sued. In fact, the corporation is the plaintiff here either because the corporation brought the lawsuit or because the shareholders forced the corporation to bring a lawsuit through a derivative action.lolfaqs
Well we're not talking about individual agents in the example of the PCGA. We can sit here and wax legally for hours about corporate law, but the facts of the matter is we're talking about a hollistic corporation, which you need some kind of evidence of wrong doing.
Avatar image for Compression
Compression

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 Compression
Member since 2006 • 195 Posts
[QUOTE="lolfaqs"]And malice has nothing to do with it. The mere fact that he acted without authority means he violated his duties as an officer. Vandalvideo
And thats nice, if you want to bring a suit of negligence against the agent, but as far as the company is involved, unless you can prove that they engaged in any kind of wrongdoing, as an individual company, then you have no cases against them. Saying "Companies act in their best interest" does not equate to "X company lied".

But it makes their statements far less trustworthy. You should take it with a grain of salt.
Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

[QUOTE="lolfaqs"]Do you not understand the concept of "personal liability"? The corporate officer is being sued personally. I.e., they're going after his own money in his bank account. It's not the corporation that is being sued. In fact, the corporation is the plaintiff here either because the corporation brought the lawsuit or because the shareholders forced the corporation to bring a lawsuit through a derivative action.Vandalvideo
Well we're not talking about individual agents in the example of the PCGA. We can sit here and wax legally for hours about corporate law, but the facts of the matter is we're talking about a hollistic corporation, which you need some kind of evidence of wrong doing.

So now you're changing the facts of my hypo? The whole point is that not a single one of those board members of PCGA is going to say anything to hurt their corporation, because if they do, the open themselves up to exactly the same kind of suit I mentioned:

Game Corp. + Shareholders v. Renegade Corporate Officer

Avatar image for Zero5000X
Zero5000X

8314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Zero5000X
Member since 2004 • 8314 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="lolfaqs"]Do you not understand the concept of "personal liability"? The corporate officer is being sued personally. I.e., they're going after his own money in his bank account. It's not the corporation that is being sued. In fact, the corporation is the plaintiff here either because the corporation brought the lawsuit or because the shareholders forced the corporation to bring a lawsuit through a derivative action.lolfaqs

Well we're not talking about individual agents in the example of the PCGA. We can sit here and wax legally for hours about corporate law, but the facts of the matter is we're talking about a hollistic corporation, which you need some kind of evidence of wrong doing.

So now you're changing the facts of my hypo? The whole point is that not a single one of those board members of PCGA is going to say anything to hurt their corporation, because if they do, the open themselves up to exactly the same kind of suit I mentioned:

Game Corp. + Shareholders v. Renegade Corporate Officer

dude, just stop feeding him. he's a troll. he has no idea what he's talking about.
Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

And the basic argument by the plaintiffs will go something like this:

Board of Directors instructed the officer to issue Statement A. The officer disregarded those instructions and, without authority, issued Statement B. As a result of Statement B, the corporation was harmed. The corporation and the shareholders now seek damages (aka money) from the officer.

Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

dude, just stop feeding him. he's a troll. he has no idea what he's talking about.Zero5000X

Oh I know. It's good review for me though. I got no more use for the guy though. :)

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#108 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Compression"] But it makes their statements far less trustworthy. You should take it with a grain of salt.

Until you can prove that the company lied, then you take their word as fact.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#109 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
So now you're changing the facts of my hypo? The whole point is that not a single one of those board members of PCGA is going to say anything to hurt their corporation, because if they do, the open themselves up to exactly the same kind of suit I mentionedlolfaqs
I'm getting back to the topic that we have been discussing this entire time; the PCGA. The PCGA, as a company, is made up of highly reputable companies.These companies, until you can prove otherwise, are the authoritative sources on the subject of PC Gaming. If they say PC gaming is doing great, I believe them. Give me evidence otherwise or leave.
Avatar image for Compression
Compression

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 Compression
Member since 2006 • 195 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Compression"] But it makes their statements far less trustworthy. You should take it with a grain of salt.

Until you can prove that the company lied, then you take their word as fact.

If the Republican party released a statement on the economy last fall, I would not take it as fact. If GM, Ford, and Chrysler published a report right now on the superior reliability of American cars over foreign imports, I would do a bit of background research. If ESPN predicted that Duke will win the national championship in basketball this year, I would be hesitant. Each of these examples show a bias towards towards their own product, which is why unless it is supported by data from other sources, its not considered reliable.
Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts
Cool, and when McDonald's their food is healthy, feel free to believe them. When Microsoft claimed RROD and disc scratching didn't exist, believe them. When tobacco company executives testify under oath that they believe cigarettes aren't addictive, believe them. When asbestos manufacturers claim asbestos didn't cause injuries to anyone, believe them.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#112 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Compression"] If the Republican party released a statement on the economy last fall, I would not take it as fact. If GM, Ford, and Chrysler published a report right now on the superior reliability of American cars over foreign imports, I would do a bit of background research. If ESPN predicted that Duke will win the national championship in basketball this year, I would be hesitant. Each of these examples show a bias towards towards their own product, which is why unless it is supported by data from other sources, its not considered reliable.

The republican party are not some of the greatest economic minds in the world. However, if a bunch of banking executives came to me right now and said, "The economy is failing, we are lacking credit" I would listen. I tend to listen to authorities on subjects in which they have expertise. I don't pretend that I can discredit them with supposition. THese people have not been proven to be unreliable. I have NO reason to not listen to the word. Give me reasons not to besides supposition. Give me clear and concise evidence the PCGA is engaging in deciminating false information.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#113 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Cool, and when McDonald's their food is healthy, feel free to believe them. When Microsoft claimed RROD and disc scratching didn't exist, believe them. When tobacco company executives testify under oath that they believe cigarettes aren't addictive, believe them. When asbestos manufacturers claim asbestos didn't cause injuries to anyone, believe them.lolfaqs
McDonalds are not the USDA. If the USDA came forth and said, "McDonalds is healthy", I would believe them. The USDA is a reputable source of information on the health of food. And so, as the PC Gaming Alliance is made up of the most reputable sources in the PC gaming industry, I believe them. Until you can provide me with clear, tangible incentives to not believe them, then I will continue to believe them. Your conspiracy theories do not discredit them.
Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts
Let's make a bet. I will flip a coin. If it's heads, I pay you $100. If it's tails, you pay me $100. I will flip the coin here at my house and post what the result is. You can trust me. I'm the authority on the subject, because only I will see side the coin lands on.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#115 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Let's make a bet. I will flip a coin. If it's heads, I pay you $100. If it's tails, you pay me $100. I will flip the coin here at my house and post what the result is. You can trust me. I'm the authority on the subject, because only I will see side the coin lands on.lolfaqs
How do I know that you're an established authority on the process of flipping coins? Besides, your example, in no way AGAIN, provides evidence that the PCGA is engaging in untrustworthy actions.
Avatar image for Compression
Compression

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 Compression
Member since 2006 • 195 Posts
[QUOTE="lolfaqs"]Cool, and when McDonald's their food is healthy, feel free to believe them. When Microsoft claimed RROD and disc scratching didn't exist, believe them. When tobacco company executives testify under oath that they believe cigarettes aren't addictive, believe them. When asbestos manufacturers claim asbestos didn't cause injuries to anyone, believe them.Vandalvideo
McDonalds are not the USDA. If the USDA came forth and said, "McDonalds is healthy", I would believe them. The USDA is a reputable source of information on the health of food. And so, as the PC Gaming Alliance is made up of the most reputable sources in the PC gaming industry, I believe them. Until you can provide me with clear, tangible incentives to not believe them, then I will continue to believe them. Your conspiracy theories do not discredit them.

Last I check, USDA was a government department that is separate from corporate responsibilities, unlike PCGA.
Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

How do I know that you're an established authority on the process of flipping coins? Besides, your example, in no way AGAIN, provides evidence that the PCGA is engaging in untrustworthy actions.Vandalvideo

No, no, I'm an established authority on this coin when I flip it thistime. No one else will have seen it at that moment other than me. You can trust me.

Avatar image for Compression
Compression

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 Compression
Member since 2006 • 195 Posts
[QUOTE="lolfaqs"]Let's make a bet. I will flip a coin. If it's heads, I pay you $100. If it's tails, you pay me $100. I will flip the coin here at my house and post what the result is. You can trust me. I'm the authority on the subject, because only I will see side the coin lands on.Vandalvideo
How do I know that you're an established authority on the process of flipping coins? Besides, your example, in no way AGAIN, provides evidence that the PCGA is engaging in untrustworthy actions.

Again, if Ford, GM, and Chrysler form the American Car Alliance (ACL) today, and publish a report listing the reasons why American cars are better than foreign cars, are you going to believe every word of that report?
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#119 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Compression"] Last I check, USDA was a government department that is separate from corporate responsibilities, unlike PCGA.

But the USDA is a reputable source of information, just as the PCGA is a reputable source of information. Simply being a corporation does not make the information they deciminate any less reputable. Especially when they are formulated by some of the greatest, most influential companies in the industry.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#120 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
No, no, I'm an established authority on this coin when I flip it thistime. No one else will have seen it at that moment other than me. You can trust me.lolfaqs
I have not been referred to you by any other reputable coin flipper. I have never heard of you in the coin flipping circles. I do not know of a lolfaqs in the betting arena. You are not a reputable coin flipper/gambler.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#121 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Compression"] Again, if Ford, GM, and Chrysler form the American Car Alliance (ACL) today, and publish a report listing the reasons why American cars are better than foreign cars, are you going to believe every word of that report?

Unless provided clear and concise evidence from other manufacturers which clearly illustrate how the ACL is wrong, then yes I will listen to the report. I tend to place more credence on quantifiable evidence than just mere supposition. Until someone is proven wrong, I listen to them. THe PCGA hasn't been proven to be wrong.
Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

[QUOTE="lolfaqs"]No, no, I'm an established authority on this coin when I flip it thistime. No one else will have seen it at that moment other than me. You can trust me.Vandalvideo
I have not been referred to you by any other reputable coin flipper. I have never heard of you in the coin flipping circles. I do not know of a lolfaqs in the betting arena. You are not a reputable coin flipper/gambler.

Do you have any evidence that I am not a reputable coin flipper? Are you claiming that I might lie to you? Why would I do that? Oh well, your loss. It landed heads by the way. you can trust me. Too bad you didn't accept though.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#123 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Do you have any evidence that I am not a reputable coin flipper? Are you claiming that I might lie to you? Why would I do that? Oh well, your loss. It landed heads by the way. you can trust me. Too bad you didn't accept though.lolfaqs
I take the word of REPUTABLE sources of information and services. You have not established yourself as a reputable gambler/coin flipper.
Avatar image for PSdual_wielder
PSdual_wielder

10646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#124 PSdual_wielder
Member since 2003 • 10646 Posts
The concept of DLC doesn't associate a cost to begin with, thats Microsoft's doing. I for one would prefer a physical copy, because despite all the talk about the internet being extremely secure due the "great efforts" by all these companies nowadays, people still have the mentality thinking its not to some degree.
Avatar image for Compression
Compression

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 Compression
Member since 2006 • 195 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Compression"] Again, if Ford, GM, and Chrysler form the American Car Alliance (ACL) today, and publish a report listing the reasons why American cars are better than foreign cars, are you going to believe every word of that report?

Unless provided clear and concise evidence from other manufacturers which clearly illustrate how the ACL is wrong, then yes I will listen to the report. I tend to place more credence on quantifiable evidence than just mere supposition. Until someone is proven wrong, I listen to them. THe PCGA hasn't been proven to be wrong.

You would not suspect the ACL to have any sort of bias whatsoever in their reports?
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#126 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Compression"] You would not suspect the ACL to have any sort of bias whatsoever in their reports?

Do I look like a car expert to you? I'm not, in any way, qualified to objectively analyze and interpret their statistics, or atleast discredit them in any way. I take them for what they are, until proven to be otherwise.
Avatar image for Compression
Compression

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Compression
Member since 2006 • 195 Posts
[QUOTE="lolfaqs"]Do you have any evidence that I am not a reputable coin flipper? Are you claiming that I might lie to you? Why would I do that? Oh well, your loss. It landed heads by the way. you can trust me. Too bad you didn't accept though.Vandalvideo
I take the word of REPUTABLE sources of information and services. You have not established yourself as a reputable gambler/coin flipper.

And how are the Companies in PCGA reputable? Just because they are large and influential? Being well-known and profitable does not make you any more honest.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#128 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Compression"] And how are the Companies in PCGA reputable? Just because they are large and influential? Being well-known and profitable does not make you any more honest.

They are large, influential, own a great of the industry, and have hundreds of contacts within the industry. They are in a spot to gauge the health of the industry, especially as developers, publishers, and distributors.
Avatar image for Compression
Compression

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 Compression
Member since 2006 • 195 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Compression"] You would not suspect the ACL to have any sort of bias whatsoever in their reports?

Do I look like a car expert to you? I'm not, in any way, qualified to objectively analyze and interpret their statistics, or atleast discredit them in any way. I take them for what they are, until proven to be otherwise.

You don't need to analyze or even understand their data. Any body can tell if they have a reason to be biased or not.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#130 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Compression"] You don't need to analyze or even understand their data. Any body can tell if they have a reason to be biased or not.

Intuition is most certainly not enough to discredit them.
Avatar image for Compression
Compression

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 Compression
Member since 2006 • 195 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Compression"] And how are the Companies in PCGA reputable? Just because they are large and influential? Being well-known and profitable does not make you any more honest.

They are large, influential, own a great of the industry, and have hundreds of contacts within the industry. They are in a spot to gauge the health of the industry, especially as developers, publishers, and distributors.

And if the industry is unhealthy, why would they be compelled to state that?
Avatar image for Zero5000X
Zero5000X

8314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 Zero5000X
Member since 2004 • 8314 Posts
did the PCGA state how they came up with those results? the methods used and such?
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#133 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Compression"] And if the industry is unhealthy, why would they be compelled to state that?

Which would be conjecture. I have no reason, besides such conjecture and intution, to not believe them. I need tangible, quantifiable evidence that they are wrong before I don't take their word.
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23344 Posts
[QUOTE="Compression"] But it makes their statements far less trustworthy. You should take it with a grain of salt. Vandalvideo
Until you can prove that the company lied, then you take their word as fact.

This approach is a good way to get scammed (ie. the Madoff scam), injured (the Ford Pinto issue), or worse. Bias needs to be evaluated before taking a source's words at face value. There are numerous examples of lies throughout history that have caused monetary damage, physical damage, and even fatal damage.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#135 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Compression"] But it makes their statements far less trustworthy. You should take it with a grain of salt. mattbbpl
Until you can prove that the company lied, then you take their word as fact.

This approach is a good way to get scammed (ie. the Madoff scam), injured (the Ford Pinto issue), or worse. Bias needs to be evaluated before taking a source's words at face value. There are numerous examples of lies throughout history that have caused monetary damage, physical damage, and even fatal damage.

You cannot knock a system based on a few extreme outliers. It is a great intellectual approach which tries to focus on facts and reputability, instead of blind fanaticism.
Avatar image for thepwninator
thepwninator

8134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#136 thepwninator
Member since 2006 • 8134 Posts
did the PCGA state how they came up with those results? the methods used and such?Zero5000X
Seeing as how most DD sources are members of the PCGA, they could've just asked said DD sources for their sales numbers...
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23344 Posts
[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] Until you can prove that the company lied, then you take their word as fact.Vandalvideo
This approach is a good way to get scammed (ie. the Madoff scam), injured (the Ford Pinto issue), or worse. Bias needs to be evaluated before taking a source's words at face value. There are numerous examples of lies throughout history that have caused monetary damage, physical damage, and even fatal damage.

You cannot knock a system based on a few extreme outliers. It is a great intellectual approach which tries to focus on facts and reputability, instead of blind fanaticism.

Those aren't the extremes. They're the norm. The US banks were professing health until they asked for the bailout. MS denied RROD for as long as they could. How many lies are flooded into people's junk email folders on a daily basis? How much marketing speak does Sony spew out on a yearly basis? Bias and spin are the norms, whether people choose to see that or not.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#138 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="mattbbpl"] Those aren't the extremes. They're the norm. The US banks were professing health until they asked for the bailout. MS denied RROD for as long as they could. How many lies are flooded into people's junk email folders on a daily basis? How much marketing speak does Sony spew out on a yearly basis? Bias and spin are the norms, whether people choose to see that or not.

No, those are the extreme outliers. Just because they make the news doesn't necessitate that they are the norm. This method has worked for me for quite some time. I've become influential and wealthy employing this method. It has its risks, but the rewards are far greater, and it allows for objectivity.
Avatar image for Compression
Compression

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 Compression
Member since 2006 • 195 Posts

No, those are the extreme outliers. Just because they make the news doesn't necessitate that they are the norm. This method has worked for me for quite some time. I've become influential and wealthy employing this method. It has its risks, but the rewards are far greater, and it allows for objectivity.Vandalvideo
I thought that you were a law student.

Ever written a History Paper before? The first thing you do after reading a primary source is to assess it for bias. Historians do it all the time, even without an obvious reason. Its because bias exists everywhere, even more so in a report published by companies with an interest to do well.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#140 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Compression"] I thought that you were a law student.

Who has played the markets and works for important people, which is all I'll say.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] And this is the major crutch of your argument. It is nothing more than conjecture, supposition, and conspiracy. It is casuistic at best. It is a gigantic appeal to ignorance.lolfaqs

That is where you are mistaken. This is not "my argument." This is me telling you what the Supreme Court, federal and state statutes, and legal precedent have said about how corporate officers must (i.e., it is not optional or discretionary) behave without exception.

But what if the only way you can maintain your corporate obligations is to purjure? Now you're in a conflict of obligations unless the obligation to speak true under oath takes precedence over the corporate obligation. PS. Evidence or not, there is a very good reason medical trials are double-blind and why statistics and findings are best expressed by independent unfunded research. Humans have an inherent self-bias (goes to our self-survival trait, thus the acronym DTA--Don't Trust Anybody).
Avatar image for DanBal76
DanBal76

1950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 DanBal76
Member since 2003 • 1950 Posts
I'm old school, i will always prefer retail (box + game + manual), even with digital distribution being considerably less priced.
Avatar image for TheLordHimself
TheLordHimself

3316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#143 TheLordHimself
Member since 2005 • 3316 Posts
I'd rather have a boxed copy thanks. Besides, downloaded games can't be traded in.
Avatar image for ChrisSpartan117
ChrisSpartan117

4519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#144 ChrisSpartan117
Member since 2008 • 4519 Posts
Valve and Criterion currently hold the record of "best example of DLC" right now.
Avatar image for Noverech
Noverech

1635

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 Noverech
Member since 2003 • 1635 Posts
[QUOTE="scoobiesnackarf"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Sounds to me like vacuous survey done to justify their lack of tracking digital distribution.lolfaqs

This. BTW, with services like Impulse, GOG, Steam D2D, and others increasing in revenue yearly, I would say that the NPD is simply

trying to ignore the fact people are buying more games via download than ever before it will continue to increase. Personally, give me a

digital download any day of the week. When it comes to PC, I will only buy via Steam now. Call me what you like but it is simply to easy

to have all of my games attached to an account that I can simply start up from any computer, 24/7, 365, and redownload unlimited times.

You may say "Well what happens when Valve goes out of business?" They have already promised a patch to release your games. I simply don't

enjoy having boxes and discs lying around. So NPD, do some more research because downloads are the future.

Those services are only relevant if you're a PC gamer. Casuals rule gaming now, like it or not. That's why the top selling PC game is World of Warcraft. That's why the top console is the Wii. That's why the top selling games are games like Wii Fit, Wii Sports, Wii Play, etc.

i've played my fair share of wow, and i can tell you that the average wow player is not at all casual. i could go as far as to say that the average wow player knows more about gaming and where the gaming industry is today then the average console-only player.

Avatar image for Marka1700
Marka1700

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 Marka1700
Member since 2003 • 7500 Posts
Put me down as one of those who prefer a hard copy. But I do make a digital purchase ocasionally but only if the price is dramtically better than the one in the shop.
Avatar image for kweeni
kweeni

11413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#147 kweeni
Member since 2007 • 11413 Posts
i prefer hard copy. never downloaded a game before(aside from demos and betas) and not planning to
Avatar image for thesmiter
thesmiter

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 thesmiter
Member since 2004 • 701 Posts
DD is great, but download sizes are becoming a problem, and will be even more so in the future. And if consoles move towards this, they will alienate people without internet, and eliminate the used game trade. But if it was an option for next gen consoles, I'd be all for it.
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#149 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

I enjoy both.

D2D and STeam on PC are awesome.

Avatar image for thepwninator
thepwninator

8134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#150 thepwninator
Member since 2006 • 8134 Posts
[QUOTE="lolfaqs"][QUOTE="scoobiesnackarf"]

This. BTW, with services like Impulse, GOG, Steam D2D, and others increasing in revenue yearly, I would say that the NPD is simply

trying to ignore the fact people are buying more games via download than ever before it will continue to increase. Personally, give me a

digital download any day of the week. When it comes to PC, I will only buy via Steam now. Call me what you like but it is simply to easy

to have all of my games attached to an account that I can simply start up from any computer, 24/7, 365, and redownload unlimited times.

You may say "Well what happens when Valve goes out of business?" They have already promised a patch to release your games. I simply don't

enjoy having boxes and discs lying around. So NPD, do some more research because downloads are the future.

Noverech

Those services are only relevant if you're a PC gamer. Casuals rule gaming now, like it or not. That's why the top selling PC game is World of Warcraft. That's why the top console is the Wii. That's why the top selling games are games like Wii Fit, Wii Sports, Wii Play, etc.

i've played my fair share of wow, and i can tell you that the average wow player is not at all casual. i could go as far as to say that the average wow player knows more about gaming and where the gaming industry is today then the average console-only player.

WoW is arguably even less casual than X3: Reunion, which is one of the most ridiculously hardcore single-player games made in the past few years.