This topic is locked from further discussion.
You're missing my point, it's unnecessary. They don't need to use their 'take candy from a baby' routine in order to sell their idea, it's obvious and it just makes them look like unprofessional loud mouths. Do they think people are going to turn around and say "oh wow, I hadn't noticed that, the PC really is superior". It's so obvious, they don't need to market this fact. It'd be like Sony continually boasting about how it's PS3 graphics are leaps and bounds beyond the Wiis. Some types of boasting are just so obvious, it just looks sad really. Is it because everyone keeps choosing competitors for their GPUs, that Nvidia need to keep reaching. Like they're sour or something. I like Nvidia, but when they do things like this, I just loose respect for them.HalcyonScarlet
No it doesn't. In your view, perhaps. They're only showing the big rise in PC gaming. Who's to say it's unnecessary? Some people might like or enjoy hearing some of this regardless of platform choice, if any.
Yet some still think PCs aren't meant for gaming. Not everyone knows it.
Sony claimed 4D and 120FPS. They already look like asshats. No really, why does talking about PC gaming make them look sour? Talking about how technology is evolving and how consoles are now (even) older? This is no different than Sony or MS claiming WE don't need another gen yet.
[QUOTE="HalcyonScarlet"]You're missing my point, it's unnecessary. They don't need to use their 'take candy from a baby' routine in order to sell their idea, it's obvious and it just makes them look like unprofessional loud mouths. Do they think people are going to turn around and say "oh wow, I hadn't noticed that, the PC really is superior". It's so obvious, they don't need to market this fact. It'd be like Sony continually boasting about how it's PS3 graphics are leaps and bounds beyond the Wiis. Some types of boasting are just so obvious, it just looks sad really. Is it because everyone keeps choosing competitors for their GPUs, that Nvidia need to keep reaching. Like they're sour or something. I like Nvidia, but when they do things like this, I just loose respect for them.ChubbyGuy40
No it doesn't. In your view, perhaps. They're only showing the big rise in PC gaming. Who's to say it's unnecessary? Some people might like or enjoy hearing some of this regardless of platform choice, if any.
Yet some still think PCs aren't meant for gaming. Not everyone knows it.
Sony claimed 4D and 120FPS. They already look like asshats. No really, why does talking about PC gaming make them look sour? Talking about how technology is evolving and how consoles are now (even) older? This is no different than Sony or MS claiming WE don't need another gen yet.
Why bring consoles into it. Why not just say, great PC games are increasing demand for our cards. It's like saying some people like hearing how the Vita is more powerful than the DS, no one cares, it's that obvious. PC evolves consoles stand still, obvious. Yes Sony and MS did make claims, and this is the same bait marketing those two used at E3 2005. They aren't discussing anything, just making short useless points. What about their 900% claims, that's not a discussion point on the subject, that's blatant marketing. This is completely different from Sony or MS saying we don't need another gen yet. They're saying that for economical reasons as well. They both need to squeeze as much out of the gen as possible before it ends and make sure the time is right for a next gen. It's so easy for devs to say we need new hardware. But a console launch gone wrong, mind all the other expenses of a new console design, can be hugely damaging for a company financially. If the PS3 launch had happened to some other company, they could have gone under.Unless you have time and energy to spec, build, upgrade, troubleshoot and tweak your system, PC gaming is not for you.
If you just want to sit down and play without hassle, you get a console.
That's all there is to say about that.
Even though it's obvious, I agree it was probably necessary to state. You can deny it. Might even anger you some. "But the console version looks good enough." But secretly you would love a version that plays and looks better, so deep down inside you might be a little sad. And finally you accept it. Of couse there's no reason to deny the PC version is better. Why be hurt over it? As long as you're happy with your console version, it's all good.
Similiarly, I'm glad Ninja Turtles arcade game was released on the 8-bit NES. While it might not have looked, sounded, or played as good as the arcade version, at least I was able to play it. And I enjoyed the game immensely. I don't see any reason to deny console gamers as much of the experience as they can get. Some people are OK with just being able to play the game. And I side with that, but at the same time acknowledge that the other version (in this case PC) is better. It's not a big deal.
[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
I don't think people argue this, but given that consoles are almost 7 years old, it is kind of sad that the difference isn't larger than it is. I saw some SkyrimPC and while it looks sharper, etc, it doesn't look leagues better. By this point, PC to Console should be like comparing a PS2 game to Uncharted 3. It clearly is not the case.
lowe0
Actually it look leagues better, if you consider that consoles play Skyrim with 1024x600 and 30fps, and i play Skyrim with 1920x1200, 60fps, that is 4 times bigger resolution and 2 times more fps, this mean that it is already 8 (4x2) times better, and that don't even include the larger view distance, better texture, shadows, water, etc
Ya right no hassle :roll:Unless you have time and energy to spec, build, upgrade, troubleshoot and tweak your system, PC gaming is not for you.
If you just want to sit down and play without hassle, you get a console.
That's all there is to say about that.
ZombieKiller7
You're absolutely right but it's all talk until the PC actually raises its game. The fact of the matter is that for whatever reason, the gap between consoles and the PC is not as big as it was in previous generations. Not as big as fanboys claim it is in a way people can actually take notice of at least. I want the PC to produce more experiences I can't get anywhere else, I want it to give me a serious reason to upgrade. I've done it many times before and I'll do it again when the PC actually DOES make console games look like pong.[QUOTE="tomarlyn"]
[QUOTE="Bruin1986"] The reason consoles are "holding their own" is because no company can justify to it's shareholders developing a AAA-budget PC-exclusive that targets only high-end rigs like Crysis did in 2007. Computers are massively more powerful now than in '07...if a company was actually given free reign and a large budget to go for a high end PC game it could make modern console games look like Pong. NoodleFighter
And I see some people need an excuse to feel big and strong (not you).
remember project offset? Compared to other games at the time and now they trulely looked last gen compared to it with some exceptions like Crysis. Oh what about Crysis no console game could go anywhere near it in all factors until Crytek managed to away to make it do able on console but making several sacrifices. If I take a screenshot of Battlefield 3 on ultra and compare to what's considered the best looking game on consoles UC3 and Gears of War 3 wouldn't the differences be completely noticable. What about Metro 2033 where even low settings on PC out did the Xbox 360 version. Like the guy has said the potential is their but isn't being done due developers fear of being another Crysis in terms of sales and several other things.
But I can still play BF3 and Metro on systems I already own at a good level without having to upgrade my PC. I mean exclusive PC experiences I just can't get anywhere else for love or money. As long as I have a PC that can play games like Football Manager, Rome Total War, Stalker and MS Flight Simulator I'm good. But there's not enough incentive to upgrade because consoles are such a great alternative to doing that right now.[QUOTE="famunda666"]
Everyone knows that the PC has better graphics duh lol. Its funny though, PC gamers are always upset that the consoles are downgrading thier games.....well maybe if more people bought the PC versions of games that would not happen, most games sell better on consoles so it makes sense for the consoles to be the lead platform. PC gaming is just too expensive and those of you claiming your 500.00 rigs will get the best graphics are liars and you know it.You just like starting wars with consoles owners.
It would seem that Hermits aparently just can't be happy playing their games, they have to spend most of their life on here complaining about why game companies are abandoning the PC.......and you wonder why people stereo type PC gamers HMMM gee I wonder, do you ever do anything but spend your time on the computer complaining on game forums? Why do you have to turn EVERY THREAD into a PC vs Console thread?
Its sad, PC versions of games are miles ahead of the consoles, and you guys just can't be happy with that. Games aren't being dumbed down because of consoles, its because of devs, because as a general rule, casual gamers are the target audience now, look at CoD look how its taken off, a game that (now)requires little skill. looks like crap, resuses the same engine every year, yet its the top selling franchise of all time. Blame developers, not us console users, they just don't want to cater to the PC crowd anymore when the games sell way better on the consoles. And a s a console owner I have to except that while it sucks, parent will buy their kids a console for gaming before a PC "sigh"
I'm sorry but really you need to get your priorities straight, I'm sick of coming here seeing the PC users get all butt hurt in every thread thats up. I'm going back to playing Skyrim on my inferior xbox 360, because unlike most PC users, internet forums are not my life, and I enjoy my platform to the fullest. SO have fun not getting laid, playing WoW, living in your parent's basement, I'm not using gamespot anymore, this site is full of crybabies. Peace out F*GS!
NoodleFighter
typical consolite right here people
More like reasnoble person ;)
How many times do you hear console gamers complaining that PC gaming is ruining console gaming? Well?
But PC gamers are constantly complaining about consoles ruining PC gaming.
And don't try to negate that :D
[QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]
[QUOTE="famunda666"]
Everyone knows that the PC has better graphics duh lol. Its funny though, PC gamers are always upset that the consoles are downgrading thier games.....well maybe if more people bought the PC versions of games that would not happen, most games sell better on consoles so it makes sense for the consoles to be the lead platform. PC gaming is just too expensive and those of you claiming your 500.00 rigs will get the best graphics are liars and you know it.You just like starting wars with consoles owners.
It would seem that Hermits aparently just can't be happy playing their games, they have to spend most of their life on here complaining about why game companies are abandoning the PC.......and you wonder why people stereo type PC gamers HMMM gee I wonder, do you ever do anything but spend your time on the computer complaining on game forums? Why do you have to turn EVERY THREAD into a PC vs Console thread?
Its sad, PC versions of games are miles ahead of the consoles, and you guys just can't be happy with that. Games aren't being dumbed down because of consoles, its because of devs, because as a general rule, casual gamers are the target audience now, look at CoD look how its taken off, a game that (now)requires little skill. looks like crap, resuses the same engine every year, yet its the top selling franchise of all time. Blame developers, not us console users, they just don't want to cater to the PC crowd anymore when the games sell way better on the consoles. And a s a console owner I have to except that while it sucks, parent will buy their kids a console for gaming before a PC "sigh"
I'm sorry but really you need to get your priorities straight, I'm sick of coming here seeing the PC users get all butt hurt in every thread thats up. I'm going back to playing Skyrim on my inferior xbox 360, because unlike most PC users, internet forums are not my life, and I enjoy my platform to the fullest. SO have fun not getting laid, playing WoW, living in your parent's basement, I'm not using gamespot anymore, this site is full of crybabies. Peace out F*GS!
nameless12345
typical consolite right here people
More like reasnoble person ;)
How many times do you hear console gamers complaining that PC gaming is ruining console gaming? Well?
But PC gamers are constantly complaining about consoles ruining PC gaming.
And don't try to negate that :D
Reasonable person maybe definately not at the end where he killed all his credibility.
[QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]
[QUOTE="famunda666"]
Everyone knows that the PC has better graphics duh lol. Its funny though, PC gamers are always upset that the consoles are downgrading thier games.....well maybe if more people bought the PC versions of games that would not happen, most games sell better on consoles so it makes sense for the consoles to be the lead platform. PC gaming is just too expensive and those of you claiming your 500.00 rigs will get the best graphics are liars and you know it.You just like starting wars with consoles owners.
It would seem that Hermits aparently just can't be happy playing their games, they have to spend most of their life on here complaining about why game companies are abandoning the PC.......and you wonder why people stereo type PC gamers HMMM gee I wonder, do you ever do anything but spend your time on the computer complaining on game forums? Why do you have to turn EVERY THREAD into a PC vs Console thread?
Its sad, PC versions of games are miles ahead of the consoles, and you guys just can't be happy with that. Games aren't being dumbed down because of consoles, its because of devs, because as a general rule, casual gamers are the target audience now, look at CoD look how its taken off, a game that (now)requires little skill. looks like crap, resuses the same engine every year, yet its the top selling franchise of all time. Blame developers, not us console users, they just don't want to cater to the PC crowd anymore when the games sell way better on the consoles. And a s a console owner I have to except that while it sucks, parent will buy their kids a console for gaming before a PC "sigh"
I'm sorry but really you need to get your priorities straight, I'm sick of coming here seeing the PC users get all butt hurt in every thread thats up. I'm going back to playing Skyrim on my inferior xbox 360, because unlike most PC users, internet forums are not my life, and I enjoy my platform to the fullest. SO have fun not getting laid, playing WoW, living in your parent's basement, I'm not using gamespot anymore, this site is full of crybabies. Peace out F*GS!
nameless12345
typical consolite right here people
More like reasnoble person ;)
How many times do you hear console gamers complaining that PC gaming is ruining console gaming? Well?
But PC gamers are constantly complaining about consoles ruining PC gaming.
And don't try to negate that :D
He doesn't know much about computers because a 500USD rig could max out most games including Skyrim at 1080P just fine.Battlefield 3 doesn't even look that good graphically, on PC. :? It's a console port with slightly better graphics (aswell as the standard Res and AA bump) and higher player count. :? Seriously, the graphics are so overrated.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iVeKIAEfj4
That was beta locked to medium on PC dude(it even says beta on the top of the screen), everyone knows this, duh. Looked much better on Ultra.Battlefield 3 doesn't even look that good graphically, on PC. :? It's a console port with slightly better graphics (aswell as the standard Res and AA bump) and higher player count. :? Seriously, the graphics are so overrated.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iVeKIAEfj4
Peredith
Battlefield 3 looks amazing on PC, one of, if not the best looking game around. That comparison video was of the beta, which had gimped graphics on PC, and was of operation metro.Battlefield 3 doesn't even look that good graphically, on PC. :? It's a console port with slightly better graphics (aswell as the standard Res and AA bump) and higher player count. :? Seriously, the graphics are so overrated.
Peredith
Pretty much. I'm sure 99% of the gamers that just game on consoles are satisfied, or content with the way the games look, and play.I'd like to build a gaming PC, I just want to do the research first. That and get the $$ together to do so. It seems like every other week great games are dropping! Which is a good thing!lolUnless you have time and energy to spec, build, upgrade, troubleshoot and tweak your system, PC gaming is not for you.
If you just want to sit down and play without hassle, you get a console.
That's all there is to say about that.
ZombieKiller7
[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]Pretty much. I'm sure 99% of the gamers that just game on consoles are satisfied, or content with the way the games look, and play.I'd like to build a gaming PC, I just want to do the research first. That and get the $$ together to do so. It seems like every other week great games are dropping! Which is a good thing!lol This. Games look very good on my PC, but I almost never find myself thinking "I wish this looked like it does on my PC" when playing a console game. (The exceptions would be Black Ops and Conviction.)Unless you have time and energy to spec, build, upgrade, troubleshoot and tweak your system, PC gaming is not for you.
If you just want to sit down and play without hassle, you get a console.
That's all there is to say about that.
godzillavskong
[QUOTE="nameless12345"]
[QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]
typical consolite right here people
NoodleFighter
More like reasnoble person ;)
How many times do you hear console gamers complaining that PC gaming is ruining console gaming? Well?
But PC gamers are constantly complaining about consoles ruining PC gaming.
And don't try to negate that :D
Reasonable person maybe definately not at the end where he killed all his credibility.
My PC gets all the girls ;)No seriously.
My brother has the PS3 version of BF3 and was tell me how much he hated it and had a launcdry list of complaints. He was over the other day and saw me playing the PC version on max settings on caspian border and couldn't believe how gimped the console version is in comparison
I bet, but to those of us who have been playing on consoles since they were released, are pretty much satisfied. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have the visuals on par with the PC, but we know that isn't going to happen, not until the next wave of consoles arrive, then the PC will once again slowly start becoming more advanced with the latest graphics cards. I think there is going to be a point when it won't be a issue, as far as the graphics go. If the next Xbox can give us twice the power of the 360, and double the performance in visuals, then I think it really wouldn't matter if it looks any better, seeing as how crisp , and clear games will look.My brother has the PS3 version of BF3 and was tell me how much he hated it and had a launcdry list of complaints. He was over the other day and saw me playing the PC version on max settings on caspian border and couldn't believe how gimped the console version is in comparison
BPoole96
[QUOTE="BPoole96"]I bet, but to those of us who have been playing on consoles since they were released, are pretty much satisfied. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have the visuals on par with the PC, but we know that isn't going to happen, not until the next wave of consoles arrive, then the PC will once again slowly start becoming more advanced with the latest graphics cards. I think there is going to be a point when it won't be a issue, as far as the graphics go. If the next Xbox can give us twice the power of the 360, and double the performance in visuals, then I think it really wouldn't matter if it looks any better, seeing as how crisp , and clear games will look.My brother has the PS3 version of BF3 and was tell me how much he hated it and had a launcdry list of complaints. He was over the other day and saw me playing the PC version on max settings on caspian border and couldn't believe how gimped the console version is in comparison
godzillavskong
AMD Radeon HD 3870/4670 has about double the GLFOPs over Xbox 360's AMD Xenos GPU.
Nobody will care just because Nvidia said it. Personally, I think Nvidia needs keep their mouth shut till they can get drivers that actually do the game justice. Mystic-GHmm, on Ultra @ 1080p, I usually get 60fps with dips into the high 40's using a 4.5GHz C2D and 2GB 560Ti @ 1.1GHz. I haven't had any driver issues at all. In fact, nVidia has been focused on perfecting the drivers for BF3 for quite some time...
Hey Nvidia didn't DICE admit to making consoles the lead platform halfway through development
NoodleFighter
Im confused, are you asking if DICE abandoned the PC version and just copy pasted the console version? Cause I can play bf3 in HD.
I bet, but to those of us who have been playing on consoles since they were released, are pretty much satisfied. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have the visuals on par with the PC, but we know that isn't going to happen, not until the next wave of consoles arrive, then the PC will once again slowly start becoming more advanced with the latest graphics cards. I think there is going to be a point when it won't be a issue, as far as the graphics go. If the next Xbox can give us twice the power of the 360, and double the performance in visuals, then I think it really wouldn't matter if it looks any better, seeing as how crisp , and clear games will look.[QUOTE="godzillavskong"][QUOTE="BPoole96"]
My brother has the PS3 version of BF3 and was tell me how much he hated it and had a launcdry list of complaints. He was over the other day and saw me playing the PC version on max settings on caspian border and couldn't believe how gimped the console version is in comparison
ronvalencia
AMD Radeon HD 3870/4670 has about double the GLFOPs over Xbox 360's AMD Xenos GPU.
Jigga what? lol[QUOTE="godzillavskong"] I bet, but to those of us who have been playing on consoles since they were released, are pretty much satisfied. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have the visuals on par with the PC, but we know that isn't going to happen, not until the next wave of consoles arrive, then the PC will once again slowly start becoming more advanced with the latest graphics cards. I think there is going to be a point when it won't be a issue, as far as the graphics go. If the next Xbox can give us twice the power of the 360, and double the performance in visuals, then I think it really wouldn't matter if it looks any better, seeing as how crisp , and clear games will look.
AMD Radeon HD 3870/4670 has about double the GLFOPs over Xbox 360's AMD Xenos GPU.
Jigga what? lol AMD Radeon HD 3870/4670 has double the compute power over AMD Xenos.Link? I don't see a resolution for Skyrim yet on Beyond 3d. Digital Foundry isn't up yet, and Lens of Truth is still just screens. I'd like to see your source.well Oblivion was 1024x600 (2xAA) so very high chance to be the same, but I should wait until the Beyond 3d or Digital Foundry comfier that. Considering that both have confirmed 720p, yes, perhaps you should wait for facts.[QUOTE="lowe0"]
[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]
Actually it look leagues better, if you consider that consoles play Skyrim with 1024x600 and 30fps, and i play Skyrim with 1920x1200, 60fps, that is 4 times bigger resolution and 2 times more fps, this mean that it is already 8 (4x2) times better, and that don't even include the larger view distance, better texture, shadows, water, etc
MK-Professor
Link? I don't see a resolution for Skyrim yet on Beyond 3d. Digital Foundry isn't up yet, and Lens of Truth is still just screens. I'd like to see your source.well Oblivion was 1024x600 (2xAA) so very high chance to be the same, but I should wait until the Beyond 3d or Digital Foundry comfier that. Nope, you're wrong:[QUOTE="lowe0"]
[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]
Actually it look leagues better, if you consider that consoles play Skyrim with 1024x600 and 30fps, and i play Skyrim with 1920x1200, 60fps, that is 4 times bigger resolution and 2 times more fps, this mean that it is already 8 (4x2) times better, and that don't even include the larger view distance, better texture, shadows, water, etc
MK-Professor
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241
Also, don't always rely on the past, the 1st 2 Resistance games were 720p, but the 3rd is960x704, lol.
well Oblivion was 1024x600 (2xAA) so very high chance to be the same, but I should wait until the Beyond 3d or Digital Foundry comfier that. Nope, you're wrong:[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]
[QUOTE="lowe0"] Link? I don't see a resolution for Skyrim yet on Beyond 3d. Digital Foundry isn't up yet, and Lens of Truth is still just screens. I'd like to see your source.
mitu123
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241
Also, don't always rely on the past, the 1st 2 Resistance games were 720p, but the 3rd is960x704, lol.
Resistance 3 still looks miles better than the rest. Resolution isn't everything but I wouldn't want to see anything this gen drop below 600p (I think COD 4 was 600p on consoles, correct me if I'm wrong), that would make my eyes hurt on my HDTV.[QUOTE="mitu123"]Nope, you're wrong:[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]well Oblivion was 1024x600 (2xAA) so very high chance to be the same, but I should wait until the Beyond 3d or Digital Foundry comfier that.
tomarlyn
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241
Also, don't always rely on the past, the 1st 2 Resistance games were 720p, but the 3rd is960x704, lol.
Resistance 3 still looks miles better than the rest. Resolution isn't everything but I wouldn't want to see anything this gen drop below 600p (I think COD 4 was 600p on consoles, correct me if I'm wrong), that would make my eyes hurt on my HDTV. Black Ops on PS3, Alan Wake and Haze are below 600p. Every other COD is 600p. And I know resolution isn't everything, lol.Resistance 3 still looks miles better than the rest. Resolution isn't everything but I wouldn't want to see anything this gen drop below 600p (I think COD 4 was 600p on consoles, correct me if I'm wrong), that would make my eyes hurt on my HDTV. Black Ops on PS3, Alan Wake and Haze are below 600p. Every other COD is 600p. And I know resolution isn't everything, lol. I thought Alan Wake was 640p or something, surprised, it looks sharp enough.[QUOTE="tomarlyn"][QUOTE="mitu123"] Nope, you're wrong:
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241
Also, don't always rely on the past, the 1st 2 Resistance games were 720p, but the 3rd is960x704, lol.
mitu123
well Oblivion was 1024x600 (2xAA) so very high chance to be the same, but I should wait until the Beyond 3d or Digital Foundry comfier that. Nope, you're wrong:[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]
[QUOTE="lowe0"] Link? I don't see a resolution for Skyrim yet on Beyond 3d. Digital Foundry isn't up yet, and Lens of Truth is still just screens. I'd like to see your source.
mitu123
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241
Also, don't always rely on the past, the 1st 2 Resistance games were 720p, but the 3rd is960x704, lol.
960x704? Good lord.....we back in 1994 here?[QUOTE="mitu123"]Black Ops on PS3, Alan Wake and Haze are below 600p. Every other COD is 600p. And I know resolution isn't everything, lol. I thought Alan Wake was 640p or something, surprised, it looks sharp enough. Nope, 960x544, but it did have 4xAA though, and for a console game that's impressive. One of the few console games to do 4xAA. That allows for a better as well.[QUOTE="tomarlyn"] Resistance 3 still looks miles better than the rest. Resolution isn't everything but I wouldn't want to see anything this gen drop below 600p (I think COD 4 was 600p on consoles, correct me if I'm wrong), that would make my eyes hurt on my HDTV.tomarlyn
[QUOTE="mitu123"]Nope, you're wrong:[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]well Oblivion was 1024x600 (2xAA) so very high chance to be the same, but I should wait until the Beyond 3d or Digital Foundry comfier that.
wis3boi
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241
Also, don't always rely on the past, the 1st 2 Resistance games were 720p, but the 3rd is960x704, lol.
960x704? Good lord.....we back in 1994 here? I have played it and notice how sub HD it was, lol. It still looked better than the other 2 in overall graphics, but not as high res.[QUOTE="mitu123"]Nope, you're wrong:[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]well Oblivion was 1024x600 (2xAA) so very high chance to be the same, but I should wait until the Beyond 3d or Digital Foundry comfier that.
wis3boi
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241
Also, don't always rely on the past, the 1st 2 Resistance games were 720p, but the 3rd is960x704, lol.
960x704? Good lord.....we back in 1994 here?1994 would have been more like 320x200 or 640x480. What were you playing at that resolution back in 1994?[QUOTE="biggest_loser"]POS keeps freezing. mitu123I don't even freeze. Your point being..? There's a lot of people with this problem and nothing has been done about it. Zip.
[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="biggest_loser"]POS keeps freezing. biggest_loserI don't even freeze. Your point being..? There's a lot of people with this problem and nothing has been done about it. Zip. My point is that it never froze on me, crashes, yeah, like a few times, but that's the 1st time I heard someone reporting freezing.
Your point being..? There's a lot of people with this problem and nothing has been done about it. Zip. My point is that it never froze on me, crashes, yeah, like a few times, but that's the 1st time I heard someone reporting freezing. Freezing/crashing same thing. Which are the best drivers to use?[QUOTE="biggest_loser"][QUOTE="mitu123"] I don't even freeze.mitu123
[QUOTE="mitu123"]My point is that it never froze on me, crashes, yeah, like a few times, but that's the 1st time I heard someone reporting freezing. Freezing/crashing same thing. Which are the best drivers to use? Not really, crashing would exit the game, freezing just makes it sit there and do nothing until you force it out. I would use either the latest(which I'm on) or 285.38.[QUOTE="biggest_loser"] Your point being..? There's a lot of people with this problem and nothing has been done about it. Zip. biggest_loser
The 41% divided by 3 equals about 13.6% for each console. 19>13.6.
agpickle
You can count the PS3,Wii,360,PS2,DC,xbox GC and the PS1 and still the PC has way more units sold,considering there is many many many more PC solds than consoles 19% is basically garbage,look how many people have play cityville on facebook more than 100 million dude.
So yeah 19% out of so many PC it basically nothing.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment