Nvidia: ''Battlefield 3 Shows PC Dramatically Better Than Consoles''

  • 151 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Androvinus
Androvinus

5796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#101 Androvinus
Member since 2008 • 5796 Posts
Now buy our graphics cards.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

You're missing my point, it's unnecessary. They don't need to use their 'take candy from a baby' routine in order to sell their idea, it's obvious and it just makes them look like unprofessional loud mouths. Do they think people are going to turn around and say "oh wow, I hadn't noticed that, the PC really is superior". It's so obvious, they don't need to market this fact. It'd be like Sony continually boasting about how it's PS3 graphics are leaps and bounds beyond the Wiis. Some types of boasting are just so obvious, it just looks sad really. Is it because everyone keeps choosing competitors for their GPUs, that Nvidia need to keep reaching. Like they're sour or something. I like Nvidia, but when they do things like this, I just loose respect for them.HalcyonScarlet

No it doesn't. In your view, perhaps. They're only showing the big rise in PC gaming. Who's to say it's unnecessary? Some people might like or enjoy hearing some of this regardless of platform choice, if any.

Yet some still think PCs aren't meant for gaming. Not everyone knows it.

Sony claimed 4D and 120FPS. They already look like asshats. No really, why does talking about PC gaming make them look sour? Talking about how technology is evolving and how consoles are now (even) older? This is no different than Sony or MS claiming WE don't need another gen yet.

Avatar image for simomate
simomate

1875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#103 simomate
Member since 2011 • 1875 Posts

Well obviously, the xbox 360 has only been outdated by todays graphics cards by 6 years...

Avatar image for HalcyonScarlet
HalcyonScarlet

13838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#104 HalcyonScarlet
Member since 2011 • 13838 Posts

[QUOTE="HalcyonScarlet"]You're missing my point, it's unnecessary. They don't need to use their 'take candy from a baby' routine in order to sell their idea, it's obvious and it just makes them look like unprofessional loud mouths. Do they think people are going to turn around and say "oh wow, I hadn't noticed that, the PC really is superior". It's so obvious, they don't need to market this fact. It'd be like Sony continually boasting about how it's PS3 graphics are leaps and bounds beyond the Wiis. Some types of boasting are just so obvious, it just looks sad really. Is it because everyone keeps choosing competitors for their GPUs, that Nvidia need to keep reaching. Like they're sour or something. I like Nvidia, but when they do things like this, I just loose respect for them.ChubbyGuy40

No it doesn't. In your view, perhaps. They're only showing the big rise in PC gaming. Who's to say it's unnecessary? Some people might like or enjoy hearing some of this regardless of platform choice, if any.

Yet some still think PCs aren't meant for gaming. Not everyone knows it.

Sony claimed 4D and 120FPS. They already look like asshats. No really, why does talking about PC gaming make them look sour? Talking about how technology is evolving and how consoles are now (even) older? This is no different than Sony or MS claiming WE don't need another gen yet.

Why bring consoles into it. Why not just say, great PC games are increasing demand for our cards. It's like saying some people like hearing how the Vita is more powerful than the DS, no one cares, it's that obvious. PC evolves consoles stand still, obvious. Yes Sony and MS did make claims, and this is the same bait marketing those two used at E3 2005. They aren't discussing anything, just making short useless points. What about their 900% claims, that's not a discussion point on the subject, that's blatant marketing. This is completely different from Sony or MS saying we don't need another gen yet. They're saying that for economical reasons as well. They both need to squeeze as much out of the gen as possible before it ends and make sure the time is right for a next gen. It's so easy for devs to say we need new hardware. But a console launch gone wrong, mind all the other expenses of a new console design, can be hugely damaging for a company financially. If the PS3 launch had happened to some other company, they could have gone under.
Avatar image for ZombieKiller7
ZombieKiller7

6463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#105 ZombieKiller7
Member since 2011 • 6463 Posts

Unless you have time and energy to spec, build, upgrade, troubleshoot and tweak your system, PC gaming is not for you.

If you just want to sit down and play without hassle, you get a console.

That's all there is to say about that.

Avatar image for LovePotionNo9
LovePotionNo9

4751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 LovePotionNo9
Member since 2010 • 4751 Posts

Even though it's obvious, I agree it was probably necessary to state. You can deny it. Might even anger you some. "But the console version looks good enough." But secretly you would love a version that plays and looks better, so deep down inside you might be a little sad. And finally you accept it. Of couse there's no reason to deny the PC version is better. Why be hurt over it? As long as you're happy with your console version, it's all good.

Similiarly, I'm glad Ninja Turtles arcade game was released on the 8-bit NES. While it might not have looked, sounded, or played as good as the arcade version, at least I was able to play it. And I enjoyed the game immensely. I don't see any reason to deny console gamers as much of the experience as they can get. Some people are OK with just being able to play the game. And I side with that, but at the same time acknowledge that the other version (in this case PC) is better. It's not a big deal.

Avatar image for MK-Professor
MK-Professor

4218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#107 MK-Professor
Member since 2009 • 4218 Posts

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

I don't think people argue this, but given that consoles are almost 7 years old, it is kind of sad that the difference isn't larger than it is. I saw some SkyrimPC and while it looks sharper, etc, it doesn't look leagues better. By this point, PC to Console should be like comparing a PS2 game to Uncharted 3. It clearly is not the case.

lowe0

Actually it look leagues better, if you consider that consoles play Skyrim with 1024x600 and 30fps, and i play Skyrim with 1920x1200, 60fps, that is 4 times bigger resolution and 2 times more fps, this mean that it is already 8 (4x2) times better, and that don't even include the larger view distance, better texture, shadows, water, etc

Link? I don't see a resolution for Skyrim yet on Beyond 3d. Digital Foundry isn't up yet, and Lens of Truth is still just screens. I'd like to see your source.

well Oblivion was 1024x600 (2xAA) so very high chance to be the same, but I should wait until the Beyond 3d or Digital Foundry comfier that.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#108 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

Unless you have time and energy to spec, build, upgrade, troubleshoot and tweak your system, PC gaming is not for you.

If you just want to sit down and play without hassle, you get a console.

That's all there is to say about that.

ZombieKiller7
Ya right no hassle :roll:
Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#109 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts

[QUOTE="tomarlyn"]

[QUOTE="Bruin1986"] The reason consoles are "holding their own" is because no company can justify to it's shareholders developing a AAA-budget PC-exclusive that targets only high-end rigs like Crysis did in 2007. Computers are massively more powerful now than in '07...if a company was actually given free reign and a large budget to go for a high end PC game it could make modern console games look like Pong. NoodleFighter

You're absolutely right but it's all talk until the PC actually raises its game. The fact of the matter is that for whatever reason, the gap between consoles and the PC is not as big as it was in previous generations. Not as big as fanboys claim it is in a way people can actually take notice of at least. I want the PC to produce more experiences I can't get anywhere else, I want it to give me a serious reason to upgrade. I've done it many times before and I'll do it again when the PC actually DOES make console games look like pong.

And I see some people need an excuse to feel big and strong (not you).

remember project offset? Compared to other games at the time and now they trulely looked last gen compared to it with some exceptions like Crysis. Oh what about Crysis no console game could go anywhere near it in all factors until Crytek managed to away to make it do able on console but making several sacrifices. If I take a screenshot of Battlefield 3 on ultra and compare to what's considered the best looking game on consoles UC3 and Gears of War 3 wouldn't the differences be completely noticable. What about Metro 2033 where even low settings on PC out did the Xbox 360 version. Like the guy has said the potential is their but isn't being done due developers fear of being another Crysis in terms of sales and several other things.

But I can still play BF3 and Metro on systems I already own at a good level without having to upgrade my PC. I mean exclusive PC experiences I just can't get anywhere else for love or money. As long as I have a PC that can play games like Football Manager, Rome Total War, Stalker and MS Flight Simulator I'm good. But there's not enough incentive to upgrade because consoles are such a great alternative to doing that right now.
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

[QUOTE="famunda666"]

Everyone knows that the PC has better graphics duh lol. Its funny though, PC gamers are always upset that the consoles are downgrading thier games.....well maybe if more people bought the PC versions of games that would not happen, most games sell better on consoles so it makes sense for the consoles to be the lead platform. PC gaming is just too expensive and those of you claiming your 500.00 rigs will get the best graphics are liars and you know it.You just like starting wars with consoles owners.

It would seem that Hermits aparently just can't be happy playing their games, they have to spend most of their life on here complaining about why game companies are abandoning the PC.......and you wonder why people stereo type PC gamers HMMM gee I wonder, do you ever do anything but spend your time on the computer complaining on game forums? Why do you have to turn EVERY THREAD into a PC vs Console thread?

Its sad, PC versions of games are miles ahead of the consoles, and you guys just can't be happy with that. Games aren't being dumbed down because of consoles, its because of devs, because as a general rule, casual gamers are the target audience now, look at CoD look how its taken off, a game that (now)requires little skill. looks like crap, resuses the same engine every year, yet its the top selling franchise of all time. Blame developers, not us console users, they just don't want to cater to the PC crowd anymore when the games sell way better on the consoles. And a s a console owner I have to except that while it sucks, parent will buy their kids a console for gaming before a PC "sigh"

I'm sorry but really you need to get your priorities straight, I'm sick of coming here seeing the PC users get all butt hurt in every thread thats up. I'm going back to playing Skyrim on my inferior xbox 360, because unlike most PC users, internet forums are not my life, and I enjoy my platform to the fullest. SO have fun not getting laid, playing WoW, living in your parent's basement, I'm not using gamespot anymore, this site is full of crybabies. Peace out F*GS!

NoodleFighter

typical consolite right here people

More like reasnoble person ;)


How many times do you hear console gamers complaining that PC gaming is ruining console gaming? Well?

But PC gamers are constantly complaining about consoles ruining PC gaming.

And don't try to negate that :D

Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11897 Posts

[QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]

[QUOTE="famunda666"]

Everyone knows that the PC has better graphics duh lol. Its funny though, PC gamers are always upset that the consoles are downgrading thier games.....well maybe if more people bought the PC versions of games that would not happen, most games sell better on consoles so it makes sense for the consoles to be the lead platform. PC gaming is just too expensive and those of you claiming your 500.00 rigs will get the best graphics are liars and you know it.You just like starting wars with consoles owners.

It would seem that Hermits aparently just can't be happy playing their games, they have to spend most of their life on here complaining about why game companies are abandoning the PC.......and you wonder why people stereo type PC gamers HMMM gee I wonder, do you ever do anything but spend your time on the computer complaining on game forums? Why do you have to turn EVERY THREAD into a PC vs Console thread?

Its sad, PC versions of games are miles ahead of the consoles, and you guys just can't be happy with that. Games aren't being dumbed down because of consoles, its because of devs, because as a general rule, casual gamers are the target audience now, look at CoD look how its taken off, a game that (now)requires little skill. looks like crap, resuses the same engine every year, yet its the top selling franchise of all time. Blame developers, not us console users, they just don't want to cater to the PC crowd anymore when the games sell way better on the consoles. And a s a console owner I have to except that while it sucks, parent will buy their kids a console for gaming before a PC "sigh"

I'm sorry but really you need to get your priorities straight, I'm sick of coming here seeing the PC users get all butt hurt in every thread thats up. I'm going back to playing Skyrim on my inferior xbox 360, because unlike most PC users, internet forums are not my life, and I enjoy my platform to the fullest. SO have fun not getting laid, playing WoW, living in your parent's basement, I'm not using gamespot anymore, this site is full of crybabies. Peace out F*GS!

nameless12345

typical consolite right here people

More like reasnoble person ;)


How many times do you hear console gamers complaining that PC gaming is ruining console gaming? Well?

But PC gamers are constantly complaining about consoles ruining PC gaming.

And don't try to negate that :D

Reasonable person maybe definately not at the end where he killed all his credibility.

Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]

[QUOTE="famunda666"]

Everyone knows that the PC has better graphics duh lol. Its funny though, PC gamers are always upset that the consoles are downgrading thier games.....well maybe if more people bought the PC versions of games that would not happen, most games sell better on consoles so it makes sense for the consoles to be the lead platform. PC gaming is just too expensive and those of you claiming your 500.00 rigs will get the best graphics are liars and you know it.You just like starting wars with consoles owners.

It would seem that Hermits aparently just can't be happy playing their games, they have to spend most of their life on here complaining about why game companies are abandoning the PC.......and you wonder why people stereo type PC gamers HMMM gee I wonder, do you ever do anything but spend your time on the computer complaining on game forums? Why do you have to turn EVERY THREAD into a PC vs Console thread?

Its sad, PC versions of games are miles ahead of the consoles, and you guys just can't be happy with that. Games aren't being dumbed down because of consoles, its because of devs, because as a general rule, casual gamers are the target audience now, look at CoD look how its taken off, a game that (now)requires little skill. looks like crap, resuses the same engine every year, yet its the top selling franchise of all time. Blame developers, not us console users, they just don't want to cater to the PC crowd anymore when the games sell way better on the consoles. And a s a console owner I have to except that while it sucks, parent will buy their kids a console for gaming before a PC "sigh"

I'm sorry but really you need to get your priorities straight, I'm sick of coming here seeing the PC users get all butt hurt in every thread thats up. I'm going back to playing Skyrim on my inferior xbox 360, because unlike most PC users, internet forums are not my life, and I enjoy my platform to the fullest. SO have fun not getting laid, playing WoW, living in your parent's basement, I'm not using gamespot anymore, this site is full of crybabies. Peace out F*GS!

nameless12345

typical consolite right here people

More like reasnoble person ;)


How many times do you hear console gamers complaining that PC gaming is ruining console gaming? Well?

But PC gamers are constantly complaining about consoles ruining PC gaming.

And don't try to negate that :D

He doesn't know much about computers because a 500USD rig could max out most games including Skyrim at 1080P just fine.
Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts
Anybody with at least half a brain cell knows this.
Avatar image for Peredith
Peredith

2289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 Peredith
Member since 2011 • 2289 Posts

Battlefield 3 doesn't even look that good graphically, on PC. :? It's a console port with slightly better graphics (aswell as the standard Res and AA bump) and higher player count. :? Seriously, the graphics are so overrated.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iVeKIAEfj4

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#115 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Battlefield 3 doesn't even look that good graphically, on PC. :? It's a console port with slightly better graphics (aswell as the standard Res and AA bump) and higher player count. :? Seriously, the graphics are so overrated.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iVeKIAEfj4

Peredith

That was beta locked to medium on PC dude(it even says beta on the top of the screen), everyone knows this, duh. Looked much better on Ultra.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#116 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

Battlefield 3 doesn't even look that good graphically, on PC. :? It's a console port with slightly better graphics (aswell as the standard Res and AA bump) and higher player count. :? Seriously, the graphics are so overrated.

Peredith

Battlefield 3 looks amazing on PC, one of, if not the best looking game around. That comparison video was of the beta, which had gimped graphics on PC, and was of operation metro.

Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#117 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

Unless you have time and energy to spec, build, upgrade, troubleshoot and tweak your system, PC gaming is not for you.

If you just want to sit down and play without hassle, you get a console.

That's all there is to say about that.

ZombieKiller7
Pretty much. I'm sure 99% of the gamers that just game on consoles are satisfied, or content with the way the games look, and play.I'd like to build a gaming PC, I just want to do the research first. That and get the $$ together to do so. It seems like every other week great games are dropping! Which is a good thing!lol
Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

Unless you have time and energy to spec, build, upgrade, troubleshoot and tweak your system, PC gaming is not for you.

If you just want to sit down and play without hassle, you get a console.

That's all there is to say about that.

godzillavskong
Pretty much. I'm sure 99% of the gamers that just game on consoles are satisfied, or content with the way the games look, and play.I'd like to build a gaming PC, I just want to do the research first. That and get the $$ together to do so. It seems like every other week great games are dropping! Which is a good thing!lol

This. Games look very good on my PC, but I almost never find myself thinking "I wish this looked like it does on my PC" when playing a console game. (The exceptions would be Black Ops and Conviction.)
Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

[QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]

typical consolite right here people

NoodleFighter

More like reasnoble person ;)


How many times do you hear console gamers complaining that PC gaming is ruining console gaming? Well?

But PC gamers are constantly complaining about consoles ruining PC gaming.

And don't try to negate that :D

Reasonable person maybe definately not at the end where he killed all his credibility.

My PC gets all the girls ;)

No seriously.

Avatar image for TheColbert
TheColbert

3846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 TheColbert
Member since 2008 • 3846 Posts
I don't even understand theses arguments anymore. PC looks better? Isn't that a fact?
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#122 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

My brother has the PS3 version of BF3 and was tell me how much he hated it and had a launcdry list of complaints. He was over the other day and saw me playing the PC version on max settings on caspian border and couldn't believe how gimped the console version is in comparison

Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#123 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

My brother has the PS3 version of BF3 and was tell me how much he hated it and had a launcdry list of complaints. He was over the other day and saw me playing the PC version on max settings on caspian border and couldn't believe how gimped the console version is in comparison

BPoole96
I bet, but to those of us who have been playing on consoles since they were released, are pretty much satisfied. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have the visuals on par with the PC, but we know that isn't going to happen, not until the next wave of consoles arrive, then the PC will once again slowly start becoming more advanced with the latest graphics cards. I think there is going to be a point when it won't be a issue, as far as the graphics go. If the next Xbox can give us twice the power of the 360, and double the performance in visuals, then I think it really wouldn't matter if it looks any better, seeing as how crisp , and clear games will look.
Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 1q3er5
Member since 2003 • 759 Posts

Hey Nvidia didn't DICE admit to making consoles the lead platform halfway through development

NoodleFighter
Yup and you could tell and thats the reason i never bought it :) DICE sold out.
Avatar image for Peredith
Peredith

2289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 Peredith
Member since 2011 • 2289 Posts

I don't find BF3 that impressive. Caspian Border barely looks any better than Crysis 1,

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#126 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

My brother has the PS3 version of BF3 and was tell me how much he hated it and had a launcdry list of complaints. He was over the other day and saw me playing the PC version on max settings on caspian border and couldn't believe how gimped the console version is in comparison

godzillavskong

I bet, but to those of us who have been playing on consoles since they were released, are pretty much satisfied. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have the visuals on par with the PC, but we know that isn't going to happen, not until the next wave of consoles arrive, then the PC will once again slowly start becoming more advanced with the latest graphics cards. I think there is going to be a point when it won't be a issue, as far as the graphics go. If the next Xbox can give us twice the power of the 360, and double the performance in visuals, then I think it really wouldn't matter if it looks any better, seeing as how crisp , and clear games will look.

AMD Radeon HD 3870/4670 has about double the GLFOPs over Xbox 360's AMD Xenos GPU.

Avatar image for superclocked
superclocked

5864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 superclocked
Member since 2009 • 5864 Posts
Nobody will care just because Nvidia said it. Personally, I think Nvidia needs keep their mouth shut till they can get drivers that actually do the game justice. Mystic-G
Hmm, on Ultra @ 1080p, I usually get 60fps with dips into the high 40's using a 4.5GHz C2D and 2GB 560Ti @ 1.1GHz. I haven't had any driver issues at all. In fact, nVidia has been focused on perfecting the drivers for BF3 for quite some time...
Avatar image for slimjimbadboy
slimjimbadboy

1731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 slimjimbadboy
Member since 2006 • 1731 Posts

Hey Nvidia didn't DICE admit to making consoles the lead platform halfway through development

NoodleFighter

Im confused, are you asking if DICE abandoned the PC version and just copy pasted the console version? Cause I can play bf3 in HD.

Avatar image for useLOGIC
useLOGIC

2802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 useLOGIC
Member since 2006 • 2802 Posts


"you're starting to see that now with a new generation of games that are coming out, such as Battlefield 3."

Kankaseni1

more like since crysis was released... in 2007?

Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#130 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

[QUOTE="godzillavskong"][QUOTE="BPoole96"]

My brother has the PS3 version of BF3 and was tell me how much he hated it and had a launcdry list of complaints. He was over the other day and saw me playing the PC version on max settings on caspian border and couldn't believe how gimped the console version is in comparison

ronvalencia

I bet, but to those of us who have been playing on consoles since they were released, are pretty much satisfied. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have the visuals on par with the PC, but we know that isn't going to happen, not until the next wave of consoles arrive, then the PC will once again slowly start becoming more advanced with the latest graphics cards. I think there is going to be a point when it won't be a issue, as far as the graphics go. If the next Xbox can give us twice the power of the 360, and double the performance in visuals, then I think it really wouldn't matter if it looks any better, seeing as how crisp , and clear games will look.

AMD Radeon HD 3870/4670 has about double the GLFOPs over Xbox 360's AMD Xenos GPU.

Jigga what? lol
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#131 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts
[QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]

Hey Nvidia didn't DICE admit to making consoles the lead platform halfway through development

1q3er5
Yup and you could tell and thats the reason i never bought it :) DICE sold out.

More like EA can boss them around or they get spanked
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#132 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
[QUOTE="godzillavskong"][QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="godzillavskong"] I bet, but to those of us who have been playing on consoles since they were released, are pretty much satisfied. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have the visuals on par with the PC, but we know that isn't going to happen, not until the next wave of consoles arrive, then the PC will once again slowly start becoming more advanced with the latest graphics cards. I think there is going to be a point when it won't be a issue, as far as the graphics go. If the next Xbox can give us twice the power of the 360, and double the performance in visuals, then I think it really wouldn't matter if it looks any better, seeing as how crisp , and clear games will look.

AMD Radeon HD 3870/4670 has about double the GLFOPs over Xbox 360's AMD Xenos GPU.

Jigga what? lol

AMD Radeon HD 3870/4670 has double the compute power over AMD Xenos.
Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

[QUOTE="lowe0"]

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

Actually it look leagues better, if you consider that consoles play Skyrim with 1024x600 and 30fps, and i play Skyrim with 1920x1200, 60fps, that is 4 times bigger resolution and 2 times more fps, this mean that it is already 8 (4x2) times better, and that don't even include the larger view distance, better texture, shadows, water, etc

MK-Professor

Link? I don't see a resolution for Skyrim yet on Beyond 3d. Digital Foundry isn't up yet, and Lens of Truth is still just screens. I'd like to see your source.

well Oblivion was 1024x600 (2xAA) so very high chance to be the same, but I should wait until the Beyond 3d or Digital Foundry comfier that.

Considering that both have confirmed 720p, yes, perhaps you should wait for facts.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#134 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="lowe0"]

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

Actually it look leagues better, if you consider that consoles play Skyrim with 1024x600 and 30fps, and i play Skyrim with 1920x1200, 60fps, that is 4 times bigger resolution and 2 times more fps, this mean that it is already 8 (4x2) times better, and that don't even include the larger view distance, better texture, shadows, water, etc

MK-Professor

Link? I don't see a resolution for Skyrim yet on Beyond 3d. Digital Foundry isn't up yet, and Lens of Truth is still just screens. I'd like to see your source.

well Oblivion was 1024x600 (2xAA) so very high chance to be the same, but I should wait until the Beyond 3d or Digital Foundry comfier that.

Nope, you're wrong:

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241

Also, don't always rely on the past, the 1st 2 Resistance games were 720p, but the 3rd is960x704, lol.

Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts
Only grachically, well whoop-de-doo-Basel Exposition...
Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#136 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] Link? I don't see a resolution for Skyrim yet on Beyond 3d. Digital Foundry isn't up yet, and Lens of Truth is still just screens. I'd like to see your source.

mitu123

well Oblivion was 1024x600 (2xAA) so very high chance to be the same, but I should wait until the Beyond 3d or Digital Foundry comfier that.

Nope, you're wrong:

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241

Also, don't always rely on the past, the 1st 2 Resistance games were 720p, but the 3rd is960x704, lol.

Resistance 3 still looks miles better than the rest. Resolution isn't everything but I wouldn't want to see anything this gen drop below 600p (I think COD 4 was 600p on consoles, correct me if I'm wrong), that would make my eyes hurt on my HDTV.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#137 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]well Oblivion was 1024x600 (2xAA) so very high chance to be the same, but I should wait until the Beyond 3d or Digital Foundry comfier that.

tomarlyn

Nope, you're wrong:

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241

Also, don't always rely on the past, the 1st 2 Resistance games were 720p, but the 3rd is960x704, lol.

Resistance 3 still looks miles better than the rest. Resolution isn't everything but I wouldn't want to see anything this gen drop below 600p (I think COD 4 was 600p on consoles, correct me if I'm wrong), that would make my eyes hurt on my HDTV.

Black Ops on PS3, Alan Wake and Haze are below 600p. Every other COD is 600p. And I know resolution isn't everything, lol.

Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#138 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts

[QUOTE="tomarlyn"][QUOTE="mitu123"] Nope, you're wrong:

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241

Also, don't always rely on the past, the 1st 2 Resistance games were 720p, but the 3rd is960x704, lol.

mitu123

Resistance 3 still looks miles better than the rest. Resolution isn't everything but I wouldn't want to see anything this gen drop below 600p (I think COD 4 was 600p on consoles, correct me if I'm wrong), that would make my eyes hurt on my HDTV.

Black Ops on PS3, Alan Wake and Haze are below 600p. Every other COD is 600p. And I know resolution isn't everything, lol.

I thought Alan Wake was 640p or something, surprised, it looks sharp enough.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#139 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] Link? I don't see a resolution for Skyrim yet on Beyond 3d. Digital Foundry isn't up yet, and Lens of Truth is still just screens. I'd like to see your source.

mitu123

well Oblivion was 1024x600 (2xAA) so very high chance to be the same, but I should wait until the Beyond 3d or Digital Foundry comfier that.

Nope, you're wrong:

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241

Also, don't always rely on the past, the 1st 2 Resistance games were 720p, but the 3rd is960x704, lol.

960x704? Good lord.....we back in 1994 here?
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#140 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="tomarlyn"] Resistance 3 still looks miles better than the rest. Resolution isn't everything but I wouldn't want to see anything this gen drop below 600p (I think COD 4 was 600p on consoles, correct me if I'm wrong), that would make my eyes hurt on my HDTV.tomarlyn

Black Ops on PS3, Alan Wake and Haze are below 600p. Every other COD is 600p. And I know resolution isn't everything, lol.

I thought Alan Wake was 640p or something, surprised, it looks sharp enough.

Nope, 960x544, but it did have 4xAA though, and for a console game that's impressive. One of the few console games to do 4xAA. That allows for a better as well.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#141 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]well Oblivion was 1024x600 (2xAA) so very high chance to be the same, but I should wait until the Beyond 3d or Digital Foundry comfier that.

wis3boi

Nope, you're wrong:

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241

Also, don't always rely on the past, the 1st 2 Resistance games were 720p, but the 3rd is960x704, lol.

960x704? Good lord.....we back in 1994 here?

I have played it and notice how sub HD it was, lol. It still looked better than the other 2 in overall graphics, but not as high res.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]well Oblivion was 1024x600 (2xAA) so very high chance to be the same, but I should wait until the Beyond 3d or Digital Foundry comfier that.

wis3boi

Nope, you're wrong:

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241

Also, don't always rely on the past, the 1st 2 Resistance games were 720p, but the 3rd is960x704, lol.

960x704? Good lord.....we back in 1994 here?

1994 would have been more like 320x200 or 640x480. What were you playing at that resolution back in 1994?
Avatar image for Leejjohno
Leejjohno

13897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#143 Leejjohno
Member since 2005 • 13897 Posts

Obviously, but it would be nice to see a game with less flaws used as benchmark.

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#144 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
POS keeps freezing.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#145 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts
POS keeps freezing. biggest_loser
I don't even freeze.
Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#146 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
[QUOTE="biggest_loser"]POS keeps freezing. mitu123
I don't even freeze.

Your point being..? There's a lot of people with this problem and nothing has been done about it. Zip.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#147 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="biggest_loser"]POS keeps freezing. biggest_loser
I don't even freeze.

Your point being..? There's a lot of people with this problem and nothing has been done about it. Zip.

My point is that it never froze on me, crashes, yeah, like a few times, but that's the 1st time I heard someone reporting freezing.

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#148 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts

[QUOTE="biggest_loser"][QUOTE="mitu123"] I don't even freeze.mitu123

Your point being..? There's a lot of people with this problem and nothing has been done about it. Zip.

My point is that it never froze on me, crashes, yeah, like a few times, but that's the 1st time I heard someone reporting freezing.

Freezing/crashing same thing. Which are the best drivers to use?
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#149 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="biggest_loser"] Your point being..? There's a lot of people with this problem and nothing has been done about it. Zip. biggest_loser

My point is that it never froze on me, crashes, yeah, like a few times, but that's the 1st time I heard someone reporting freezing.

Freezing/crashing same thing. Which are the best drivers to use?

Not really, crashing would exit the game, freezing just makes it sit there and do nothing until you force it out. I would use either the latest(which I'm on) or 285.38.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

The 41% divided by 3 equals about 13.6% for each console. 19>13.6.

agpickle

You can count the PS3,Wii,360,PS2,DC,xbox GC and the PS1 and still the PC has way more units sold,considering there is many many many more PC solds than consoles 19% is basically garbage,look how many people have play cityville on facebook more than 100 million dude.

So yeah 19% out of so many PC it basically nothing.