Oblivion: PC vs PS3 vs X360

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#151 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="reelbigfish"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Kayrod29"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Gamespot reviews "The high end PC version is clearly better". Problem solved.

Gamespot also says: Xbox 360 9.6> PC 9.3 Problem solved.

Standards. We have more WRPGs, so theres more competition. Competition = higher standards. So directly comparing scores = ludicrously wrong.

Can you show me where it says that gamespot review scores are based on "standards"



Every gaming platform is different, especially in terms of its technical features. However, we believe high-quality gaming experiences are possible on all the gaming platforms that we cover. So we review games against the standards of their respective platforms by implicitly comparing them to other games on that same platform and, to a lesser extent, to other games in that genre. As a result, our ratings of games on different platforms are not intended to be directly compared to one another.

http://au.gamespot.com/misc/reviewguidelines.html
Avatar image for reelbigfish
reelbigfish

919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#152 reelbigfish
Member since 2005 • 919 Posts
EVERYONE THERE IS ONLY ONE SENTENCE THAT CAN STOP THIS KERFUFFLE!! MORROWIND IS BETTER!! its in capitols so it is true :)
Avatar image for reelbigfish
reelbigfish

919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#153 reelbigfish
Member since 2005 • 919 Posts
[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="reelbigfish"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Kayrod29"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Gamespot reviews "The high end PC version is clearly better". Problem solved.

Gamespot also says: Xbox 360 9.6> PC 9.3 Problem solved.

Standards. We have more WRPGs, so theres more competition. Competition = higher standards. So directly comparing scores = ludicrously wrong.

Can you show me where it says that gamespot review scores are based on "standards"



Every gaming platform is different, especially in terms of its technical features. However, we believe high-quality gaming experiences are possible on all the gaming platforms that we cover. So we review games against the standards of their respective platforms by implicitly comparing them to other games on that same platform and, to a lesser extent, to other games in that genre. As a result, our ratings of games on different platforms are not intended to be directly compared to one another.

http://au.gamespot.com/misc/reviewguidelines.html

TOUCHE MR.DANM_999
Avatar image for avenger_dot
avenger_dot

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 avenger_dot
Member since 2007 • 804 Posts

There is one HARD fact here, Oblivion was not made ground up for 360, meaning it looks half of what possibly could, and it is a 1st gen title, meaning it looks another half of what it could be

Meaning 360 could run Oblivion 4x better if it was made ground up AND was a 3rd gen title, maybe far better than the pc with mods version we see now, which frankly only has some more bumped and detailed textures, that Kameo EASILY rivals anyway

Of course i am not blind, a pc could run it EVEN better with a 8800GTX card, it is obvious, but that pc pics is totally possible on 360, that is all

avenger_dot

So, care to prove me wrong ?

Avatar image for Einhanderkiller
Einhanderkiller

13259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#155 Einhanderkiller
Member since 2003 • 13259 Posts
[QUOTE="avenger_dot"]

There is one HARD fact here, Oblivion was not made ground up for 360, meaning it looks half of what possibly could, and it is a 1st gen title, meaning it looks another half of what it could be

Meaning 360 could run Oblivion 4x better if it was made ground up AND was a 3rd gen title, maybe far better than the pc with mods version we see now, which frankly only has some more bumped and detailed textures, that Kameo EASILY rivals anyway

Of course i am not blind, a pc could run it EVEN better with a 8800GTX card, it is obvious, but that pc pics is totally possible on 360, that is all

avenger_dot

So, care to prove me wrong ?

Four times? May I ask where the hell did you get that number? And "half" of what it possibly could do? :? If Oblivion were a "second-gen" title, that wouldn't automatically make it look twice as good as a "first-gen" title; things don't work like that. Unless a better compression method is used for the textures--better than DXT1 (uses 4-bits for each pixel but does not require an alpha channel (if it has one then it is 1-bit)), which is the lowest quality but lowers the filesize the most--then the Xbox 360 will be unable to create graphics (smoothly, at least) comparable to that of Oblivion on the PC using QTP3 due to RAM limitations. It may be able to do it with heavy modifications and newer technologies, but right now, no, it cannot. Of course, if Bethesda were to rework Oblivion by the time the "3rd gen" rolled around, Oblivion would be better on the Xbox 360 than the PC (which would be the "1st gen" version), but that will not happen. I'm not saying that the 360 is not capable of generating graphics that are as good as Oblivion on the PC with graphics-enhancing mods, but rather that Oblivion on the 360, if the majority of the code were to be left untouched, is incapable of being graphically as good as the PC version due to hardware limitations.
Avatar image for BangaaPride
BangaaPride

428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 BangaaPride
Member since 2006 • 428 Posts
Is it just me or is Oblivion a lot of trouble for any platform it's on? It seems to stretch anything its plays on to the limit. I wanted to play it on PC but I didn't want to put a second mortgage out for the upgrade costs. 
Avatar image for Only_the_Truth
Only_the_Truth

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 Only_the_Truth
Member since 2006 • 29 Posts

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: IT WAS ENTIRLY DUE TO EXTRA DEVELOPMENT TIME. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others can't, it's actually something we were considering doing for the other platforms as well. We specifically did it here because we had some time and one of our graphics programmers said he could do it. Things like that are in the PS3 version,

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

TOPIC CREATOR PWNED, BY BETHSEDA DEVS.

XBOX 360 IS MORE POWERFUL, MORE CAPABLE SYSTEM THAN PS3.

boboisback

Err, the topic creator, i.e. me, never said anything about the PS3 being more powerful than the 360.  The shots were posted to show how much better the PC version of the game is than either console.

Avatar image for Only_the_Truth
Only_the_Truth

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 Only_the_Truth
Member since 2006 • 29 Posts

Then why didn't it look like that on pc from the start anyway ? avenger_dot

Because its a straight port from the 360 version of course.  I don't know what your trying to get at with that point as we already know the PC is capable.  Its purely a matter of developer effort.

And you can't call those VASTLY superior, it is just one bump map shader in the distance, and reflections in the water, and some a bit more detailed textures, all could easilly be done on 360 if it had more ram and a year to optimize, it was just a 1st gen game on 360, remember ?

I can call it vastly superior because it is obviously, vastly superior.  Bot the distance and close up textures are clearly far improved, as is the water and the level of object detail.  Its like looking at an xbox 1 game compared to the same game on X360.

The 360 simply could not have handled that level of detail.  Give it more memory?  Err why don't you give it faster memory and a second GPU aswell eh?  Sure if you make the 360 more powerful it could manage that detail but what does that tell us about the real 360 in the real world?  Nothing.

And yes it was a first gen game but the 360 version got just as much attention as the PC version and the PC version looked better even without the mods.  In fact the PC version with mods actually looks better than ANY 360 game available today and yes, that includes Gears or War.

3rd-4rth gen games on cosnoles can be 2x-3x better looking, this is ALWAYS the case in ALL consoles to date

They will be better looking than the 360 version, sure.  But whether they will look as good as the modded PC version is debatable.  Anyway, we will be on ES5 by then which will probably look as good as or better than Crysis.

And the game was FAR from made round up for 360 too, so the question is, can YOU confirm 360 could not run with those textures and the right optimizations/tricks ?

Nor was the game made for the PC from the ground up and yes I CAN confirm that the 360 is completely incapable of running at those detail settings regardless of what optimisations you make because they require over 512MB of graphics memory alone.  Maybe with a lot more optimisation the game could have looked similar to the PC version but bottonm line is that it didn't, and with the same level of effort being put into both the PC version ended up looking better. 

Avatar image for Only_the_Truth
Only_the_Truth

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 Only_the_Truth
Member since 2006 • 29 Posts

There is one HARD fact here, Oblivion was not made ground up for 360, meaning it looks half of what possibly could, and it is a 1st gen title, meaning it looks another half of what it could beavenger_dot

Oblivion is far more optimised for the 360 than it is for any one PC setup so your point is meaningless.  Even with less optimisation the PC version looks better so if both versions were optimised ot the max the difference would be even greater in favour of the PC.

Meaning 360 could run Oblivion 4x better if it was made ground up AND was a 3rd gen title, maybe far better than the pc with mods version we see now, which frankly only has some more bumped and detailed textures, that Kameo EASILY rivals anyway

4x better?  Uh yeah :roll:

No the 360 could never run Oblivion as well as the modded PC version because it doesn't come close to the memory requirements which approach 2.5GB total on a Vista system.

And no, Kameo doesn't have a patch on the modded PC version.  Yes it looks nice but as someone who owns both I can easily say that modded Oblivion is head and shoulders above Kameo.

Of course i am not blind, a pc could run it EVEN better with a 8800GTX card, it is obvious, but that pc pics is totally possible on 360, that is all

Yeah whatever.  I guess thats why the 360 version looked so much worse eh?  The PC version is less optimised than the 360 version and all it has had applied are a few amature, homemade mods.  Are you telling me the devs are incapable of the same feats with all there funding and experience?

Anyway, all this rubbish about the 360 "could" have done this and "could" have done that is worthless.  It didn't, and the result is that PC gamers get the much better experience.

Avatar image for alex1889
alex1889

1633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#161 alex1889
Member since 2006 • 1633 Posts

they all look awesome, but the pc has mods for free

Avatar image for Nolakk
Nolakk

321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 Nolakk
Member since 2005 • 321 Posts
Only_the_Truth can you tell me exactly what mods are you using? because i really want my game to look like that screen.

Thanks
Avatar image for Only_the_Truth
Only_the_Truth

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 Only_the_Truth
Member since 2006 • 29 Posts

Only_the_Truth can you tell me exactly what mods are you using? because i really want my game to look like that screen.

Thanks
Nolakk

To be honest with you, I can't remember properly.  I know im using most, if not all of Qarls stuff so thats Qarls Texture pack 2 plus 2 or three other files for distance textures.

Im also using a mod called something like "make eveything visible" which shows more distant objects like ruins and buildings that wouldn't nornmally show until much nearer.  Add to that natural environments and natural wildlife (but not natural weather, I hate the way it makes eveything so bright and utopia like).

Im also using parallaxed worlds (I think thats what its called) which adds superb parallax mapping to most buildings and im running a tweaked ini with denser grass, longer draw distances and all water reflections turned on (amoungst numerous other tweaks).

On tip i would give when tweaking the ini is if your using the ditance improving textures above, make sure you leave the "ugridstoload" figure at 5.  Anything higher will screw up the distance textures and have a heavy impact in framerate.  Simply increasing your view distance in the ini can have much the same effect without the downfalls.

Also, for gameplay I STRONGLY suggest Ocsuro's Oblivion overhaul, it changes many things and adds a ton of content but most importantly, it gives the game a real leveling system so you can actually feel like your progressing.

Avatar image for Resident_Fan_
Resident_Fan_

591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 Resident_Fan_
Member since 2004 • 591 Posts

PS3 > PC > X360.

kinq

:lol:
PC> XBOX360 > PS3
fixed
Avatar image for Nolakk
Nolakk

321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 Nolakk
Member since 2005 • 321 Posts

[QUOTE="Nolakk"]Only_the_Truth can you tell me exactly what mods are you using? because i really want my game to look like that screen.

Thanks
Only_the_Truth

To be honest with you, I can't remember properly. I know im using most, if not all of Qarls stuff so thats Qarls Texture pack 2 plus 2 or three other files for distance textures.

Im also using a mod called something like "make eveything visible" which shows more distant objects like ruins and buildings that wouldn't nornmally show until much nearer. Add to that natural environments and natural wildlife (but not natural weather, I hate the way it makes eveything so bright and utopia like).

Im also using parallaxed worlds (I think thats what its called) which adds superb parallax mapping to most buildings and im running a tweaked ini with denser grass, longer draw distances and all water reflections turned on (amoungst numerous other tweaks).

On tip i would give when tweaking the ini is if your using the ditance improving textures above, make sure you leave the "ugridstoload" figure at 5. Anything higher will screw up the distance textures and have a heavy impact in framerate. Simply increasing your view distance in the ini can have much the same effect without the downfalls.

Also, for gameplay I STRONGLY suggest Ocsuro's Oblivion overhaul, it changes many things and adds a ton of content but most importantly, it gives the game a real leveling system so you can actually feel like your progressing.




Thanks for your help i really appreciate it

Im gonna start to download all that (i can´t believe im gonna play oblivion like it is in that screen :D )
Avatar image for Doc_smock
Doc_smock

308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#166 Doc_smock
Member since 2005 • 308 Posts
The PS3 one looks better than the 360 when I heard it was the other way round. Any explanations?
Avatar image for avenger_dot
avenger_dot

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 avenger_dot
Member since 2007 • 804 Posts
[QUOTE="avenger_dot"][QUOTE="avenger_dot"]

There is one HARD fact here, Oblivion was not made ground up for 360, meaning it looks half of what possibly could, and it is a 1st gen title, meaning it looks another half of what it could be

Meaning 360 could run Oblivion 4x better if it was made ground up AND was a 3rd gen title, maybe far better than the pc with mods version we see now, which frankly only has some more bumped and detailed textures, that Kameo EASILY rivals anyway

Of course i am not blind, a pc could run it EVEN better with a 8800GTX card, it is obvious, but that pc pics is totally possible on 360, that is all

Einhanderkiller

So, care to prove me wrong ?

Four times? May I ask where the hell did you get that number? And "half" of what it possibly could do? :? If Oblivion were a "second-gen" title, that wouldn't automatically make it look twice as good as a "first-gen" title; things don't work like that. Unless a better compression method is used for the textures--better than DXT1 (uses 4-bits for each pixel but does not require an alpha channel (if it has one then it is 1-bit)), which is the lowest quality but lowers the filesize the most--then the Xbox 360 will be unable to create graphics (smoothly, at least) comparable to that of Oblivion on the PC using QTP3 due to RAM limitations. It may be able to do it with heavy modifications and newer technologies, but right now, no, it cannot. Of course, if Bethesda were to rework Oblivion by the time the "3rd gen" rolled around, Oblivion would be better on the Xbox 360 than the PC (which would be the "1st gen" version), but that will not happen. I'm not saying that the 360 is not capable of generating graphics that are as good as Oblivion on the PC with graphics-enhancing mods, but rather that Oblivion on the 360, if the majority of the code were to be left untouched, is incapable of being graphically as good as the PC version due to hardware limitations.

I agree that without optimization would not run, like on PC, due to ram limitations, but that is not what i suggested anyway, not just put those textures as on pc and will work, that IS imposible

Still, it could do that kind of graphics with proper work

Avatar image for Arnalion
Arnalion

3316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 Arnalion
Member since 2006 • 3316 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Gamespot reviews "The high end PC version is clearly better". Problem solved.

What was high-end PC then is mid-end PC now.
Avatar image for navneet21
navneet21

1625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 navneet21
Member since 2003 • 1625 Posts
[QUOTE="kinq"]

PS3 > PC > X360.

Resident_Fan_

:lol:
PC> XBOX360 > PS3
fixed

PC>PS3>Xbox 360 Can't you tell the difference from the pics...
Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#170 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts
[QUOTE="Arnalion"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Gamespot reviews "The high end PC version is clearly better". Problem solved.

What was high-end PC then is mid-end PC now.



In couple of months it will be low mid end...with the Cor 2 Duo 6300 pricedrop and a 8600Ultra...
Avatar image for turgore
turgore

7859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#171 turgore
Member since 2006 • 7859 Posts
[QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="Arnalion"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Gamespot reviews "The high end PC version is clearly better". Problem solved.

What was high-end PC then is mid-end PC now.



In couple of months it will be low mid end...with the Cor 2 Duo 6300 pricedrop and a 8600Ultra...



How much did you invest in your PC so far ?
Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#172 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts
[QUOTE="turgore"][QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="Arnalion"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Gamespot reviews "The high end PC version is clearly better". Problem solved.

What was high-end PC then is mid-end PC now.



In couple of months it will be low mid end...with the Cor 2 Duo 6300 pricedrop and a 8600Ultra...



How much did you invest in your PC so far ?



Over the span of 2004-2007, Ive spent £550 (I have a PCIE motherboard and socket 775 C2D) in total Im planning to get a 8600Ultra after march for £90 and selling my X1950Pro...which ill be able to push for at least £40...Plus ive been enjoying £25-£30 games on average...which with the 20 games that I own means that ive saved around £400 on games alone...
Just for you to understand the £ an Xbox360 costs £280....


Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#174 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
The PC is the best version, a crap load of mods make this PoS rpg game average.
Avatar image for Phenom316
Phenom316

1650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 Phenom316
Member since 2008 • 1650 Posts

Gamespot reviews "The high end PC version is clearly better". Problem solved.Vandalvideo

Great responce.

Gives me all the info i need 2 know, woohooo

Avatar image for BelAir1
BelAir1

338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 BelAir1
Member since 2007 • 338 Posts
Heh, this thread is still alive? Wow. Are the console boys still trying to argue their version?
Avatar image for Helbrec
Helbrec

1325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#177 Helbrec
Member since 2008 • 1325 Posts
PC is the best but 360 is defenatly the best console version.
Avatar image for Juggernaut140
Juggernaut140

36011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#178 Juggernaut140
Member since 2007 • 36011 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="alcarazo9"]the 360 version in better, it has achievemt points and great graphics, i agree in the pic the PC looks better but you know how much money do you have to spend on a graphics card to get those grahicsalcarazo9
Not very much. high end cards can be as low as 250.


i prefer to buy a wii with that money, im quite happy with the version i have, the only thing i regret is that you can get mods in the pc version

You'd rather get a Wii than be able to play games like Crysis, STALKER, World in Conflict, Company of Heroes, Star Craft 2, Dawn of War 2, and Total War: Empires? :?

Avatar image for Juggernaut140
Juggernaut140

36011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#179 Juggernaut140
Member since 2007 • 36011 Posts
Damn it. I didn't realize that this was a bumped thread :evil:
Avatar image for aliblabla2007
aliblabla2007

16756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#180 aliblabla2007
Member since 2007 • 16756 Posts

Total War: Empires? :?

Juggernaut140

It's Empire: Total War.

*goes back to non-fussy mode*

Avatar image for ILK3R91
ILK3R91

493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 ILK3R91
Member since 2008 • 493 Posts
It just is better on the X360.
Avatar image for noswear
noswear

3263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 noswear
Member since 2008 • 3263 Posts
Can't we just agree that they're all bad?
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#183 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

The PS3 one looks better than the 360 when I heard it was the other way round. Any explanations?Doc_smock

Lemmings that don't do proper research.

The PC one looks fantastic, with the proper mods.

Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#184 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
Dudez...like bringin back dead threadz is so tubular!!!one111one
Avatar image for Juggernaut140
Juggernaut140

36011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#185 Juggernaut140
Member since 2007 • 36011 Posts
[QUOTE="Juggernaut140"]

Total War: Empires? :?

aliblabla2007

It's Empire: Total War.

*goes back to non-fussy mode*

My bad :oops:

Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
PC wins. As for console i own it on both the PS3 & 360. PS3 version > 360 version. The 360 version does have access to the dungeon and armor DLC though.
Avatar image for Iantheone
Iantheone

8242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#189 Iantheone
Member since 2007 • 8242 Posts
Mods make PC far better :D
Avatar image for EddyPee
EddyPee

474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#190 EddyPee
Member since 2005 • 474 Posts

PC. A little thing called FCOM.

Avatar image for Vesica_Prime
Vesica_Prime

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#191 Vesica_Prime
Member since 2009 • 7062 Posts

What curious artifact have we unearthed here?

Avatar image for brickdoctor
brickdoctor

9746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 156

User Lists: 0

#192 brickdoctor
Member since 2008 • 9746 Posts

Small differences but overall the same great game, same goes to Fallout 3.

Avatar image for Filthybastrd
Filthybastrd

7124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 Filthybastrd
Member since 2009 • 7124 Posts

I can't believe this topic......

1: the pc version looks and is better than it's console counterarts (The margin is very large as well if you exploit the advantages of modding. Which you should).

2: All versions look like crap. This also goes for F3.

If anything detracts from the pc version, it's that Bethesda left it to modders to make it into a proper pc game and not just a sloppy port running on superior hardware.

Avatar image for iowastate
iowastate

7922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#194 iowastate
Member since 2004 • 7922 Posts

they are all great fun but there is no doubt the PC has the most DLC, and while the PS3 has superior graphics it has the least mods and the most problems with glitches.

Why do so many people who enjoy the game on their system insist on whinging about someone elses system instead of just letting everyone play it the way they would prefer and let us all game on and enjoy Elder Scrolls

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Happy 2007 people.
Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts

Quite simply, the PS3 is the worst version to own.

If we disregard the PC version for a minute (because we all know its by far the best version to have) then graphically, both the PS3 and 360 versions are practically the same. Yes, the PS3 has the slight edge, but thats all, nothing major as the 360 version was patched with improvements post PS3 launch.

But the PS3 version lacks access to a lot of awesome content thats available to both the 360 and PC versions, such as the theives den. So it looses. And yes, I own both versions (no PC version unfortunately:( )

Avatar image for Vesica_Prime
Vesica_Prime

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#198 Vesica_Prime
Member since 2009 • 7062 Posts

I've heard rumours that there is an old man in Tibet that has found several medicinal herbs that have the ability to rejuvenate dead threads.

Avatar image for yanbuco2712
yanbuco2712

456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#199 yanbuco2712
Member since 2006 • 456 Posts

I've heard rumours that there is an old man in Tibet that has found several medicinal herbs that have the ability to rejuvenate dead threads.

Vesica_Prime

Must've been Tenzin

Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts
Really old thread... PC version stomps the console versions even without mods.