[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="IceBlazerX"]I think you just explained pretty well why scores are quite often a bad way for comparing games. I take all scores with a lot of salt. I play the game myself and review it myself by the genre's standards first. Which is what you should do rather than comparing two games from different genres using scores.Yes, but you don't understand: They said that ACiT was the near best in the series. So why did that score less than every single PS2 one?
And then they said that QfB was the best R&C game since UYA.
Deadlocked got a score of 8.6. QfB got 7.5
And if the first R&C game that scored a ridicously high score of 9 is better than every single other R&C game yet according to that logic when they said otherwise.
IceBlazerX
Log in to comment