• 113 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for fireballonfire
fireballonfire

891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 fireballonfire
Member since 2009 • 891 Posts

[QUOTE="fireballonfire"]

Yes, so it seems.

What's you take on the subject?

musicalmac

lol, I'm just being difficult. I have always owned macs in my personal life, but always worked with Windows pcs at work. I greatly prefer OSX, though MS did make some good strides with Windows 7. I just wish people would realize that Macs and PCs are both-- PERSONAL COMPUTERS. Individuals who game on their Mac (oh they're out there), and believe their platform (the personal computer) to be the best platform to play games on-- are hermits (or at least a variation of such). Most of the negativity aimed at Apple isn't based on anything. People usually have no clue as to what they're talking about. :P

So what it comes down to is, OS preference. MAC users are willing to sacrifice all the advantages of windows based PCs for the OSX?

Well I don't think I only speak for myself when I say this but, I thought as much.

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

The PC section has a similar thread. I might as well post here too.

I have an older Intel Mac Mini I use for internet and MS Office plus I like having other OSes besides Windows. It's an okay computer although not really something to brag about.

Beats me why people here hate Macs (not just MacBooks) in general. You'd think one ate their firstborn or something. Of course, there's also the snooty Mac zealots whose noses are stuck so high up. I guess the two groups cancel each other out. One zealot to another.

Avatar image for dc337
dc337

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 dc337
Member since 2008 • 2603 Posts

Macs are a waste of time if you like games.

Selection is smaller, prices are often higher for the same titles and games run better in Windows.

Avatar image for paradigm68
paradigm68

5588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 paradigm68
Member since 2003 • 5588 Posts
Better for Gaming=PC. Better for everything=Mac
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#55 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] Except for the whole charging an arm and a leg for cheap PC parts. Like in the case of my friend getting 335 dollars worth of hardware for 1000 dollars from Apple. That is completely true.

It's not that simple. It's so not that simple that it has me wondering if you're being entirely honest, or just the typical uneducated PC gamer guy.

So what it comes down to is, OS preference. MAC users are willing to sacrifice all the advantages of windows based PCs for the OSX?

Well I don't think I only speak for myself when I say this but, I thought as much.

fireballonfire
What am I sacrificing with my MacBook Pro? I really see it the other way around. I have three computers in one, and I can boot all three (OSX, Windows, Linux- lol) operating systems simultaneously if I want. If you're a power user, it's always handy to have more software abilities than less.
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

I was thinking, since PC fans love to compare console to PC, which is forever upgradeable. How about a more fare comparison.How would a gaming PC fare against a gaming MAC in terms power. Hope you guys get the underlying message of this:P

1Stark1

In the high performance 15inch-to-16inch laptop size, the current MacBook Pro is only equiped with NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M.

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#57 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

MACs are PCs!

what you meant to say was Windows vs Mac OSX

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#58 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
In the high performance 15inch-to-16inch laptop size, the current MacBook Pro is only equiped with NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M. ronvalencia
Yes, this is a real, honest criticism. Apple's due to refresh the line, but the 330M is really the result of the Intel and NVIDIA scuffle. It's a pity.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] Except for the whole charging an arm and a leg for cheap PC parts. Like in the case of my friend getting 335 dollars worth of hardware for 1000 dollars from Apple. That is completely true.musicalmac
It's not that simple. It's so not that simple that it has me wondering if you're being entirely honest, or just the typical uneducated PC gamer guy.

So what it comes down to is, OS preference. MAC users are willing to sacrifice all the advantages of windows based PCs for the OSX?

Well I don't think I only speak for myself when I say this but, I thought as much.

fireballonfire

What am I sacrificing with my MacBook Pro? I really see it the other way around. I have three computers in one, and I can boot all three (OSX, Windows, Linux- lol) operating systems simultaneously if I want. If you're a power user, it's always handy to have more software abilities than less.

What do you mean it's not that simple? A guy at work bought an Apple desktop from Best Buy that was 1400 dollars. The parts consisted of an i3 processor, 16 gbs of DDR3 1333 mhz ram, and a 4670(which is a 70 dollar video card). Tell me how he got his money's worth for those parts.

Is it because he bought it from Best Buy? I know you could probable build a PC and stick OSX on it for a lot less.

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#60 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
What do you mean it's not that simple? A guy at work bought a desktop from Apple that was 1400 dollars. The parts consisted of an i3 processor, 16 gbs of DDR3 1333 mhz ram, and a 4670(which is a 70 dollar video card). Tell me how he got his money's worth for those parts.DragonfireXZ95
Is that all the computer included? (lol he got 16gb of ram? epic)
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]What do you mean it's not that simple? A guy at work bought a desktop from Apple that was 1400 dollars. The parts consisted of an i3 processor, 16 gbs of DDR3 1333 mhz ram, and a 4670(which is a 70 dollar video card). Tell me how he got his money's worth for those parts.musicalmac
Is that all the computer included? (lol he got 16gb of ram? epic)

I changed it a bit, because I didn't include all the details.

Is it because he bought it from Best Buy? I know you could probably build a PC and stick OSX on it for a lot less.

He also said he got some media package that included some programs, not sure what though.

Avatar image for paradigm68
paradigm68

5588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 paradigm68
Member since 2003 • 5588 Posts

MACs are PCs!

what you meant to say was Windows vs Mac OSX

LegatoSkyheart
There's hardware differences to count in also.
Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#63 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

MACs are PCs!

what you meant to say was Windows vs Mac OSX

paradigm68

There's hardware differences to count in also.

no there isn't

Avatar image for edidili
edidili

3449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 edidili
Member since 2004 • 3449 Posts

Beats me why people here hate Macs (not just MacBooks) in general.

jun_aka_pekto

You wonder why Mac is hated in a gaming forum?

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#65 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]I changed it a bit, because I didn't include all the details. Is it because he bought it from Best Buy? I know you could probably build a PC and stick OSX on it for a lot less.

I was just remarking that 16 gigs of ram is awesome. My point was that the drool-worthy, LED-backlit screens on those iMacs aren't free, nor is the included software (which is 9 times out of 10 full versions and not trials and bloatware). Apple's tech support and customer service are also unrivaled, and aren't free either. It's like looking at a private college vs a state school. Macs offer a lot of the little things you don't know you would appreciate. At least Windows 7 closed the gap a little bit, especially with searching.
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="fireballonfire"]

Yes, so it seems.

What's you take on the subject?

musicalmac

lol, I'm just being difficult. I have always owned macs in my personal life, but always worked with Windows pcs at work. I greatly prefer OSX, though MS did make some good strides with Windows 7. I just wish people would realize that Macs and PCs are both-- PERSONAL COMPUTERS. Individuals who game on their Mac (oh they're out there), and believe their platform (the personal computer) to be the best platform to play games on-- are hermits (or at least a variation of such). Most of the negativity aimed at Apple isn't based on anything. People usually have no clue as to what they're talking about. :P

In the old days, Apple Macintosh was referred as "micro-computers". The "PC" is ussually referred to IBM PC and compatibles. Apple Macintosh was a seperate hardware platform from the IBM PC standard.

Around 2006 (Intel Core1 era), Apple made a switch to Intel based PC. Besides the GPU, there's very little architectural differences between my Dell Studio XPS 1645 and current MacBook Pro laptops i.e. with EmpireEFI bootloader**, I can install unmodifed MacOS X 10.6 retail.

**Adds Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) features to BIOS based PCs.

Avatar image for RanDoMcApZ
RanDoMcApZ

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 RanDoMcApZ
Member since 2011 • 218 Posts

they are quite diffrent rly, yeah macs r so much more expensive for the hardware they have compared to a pc of the same price, but the mac software doesnt need that much power to run it, and what ur paying with that extra money is for a reliable computer(my bros has lasted 6 years and still uses it lol) , which is more user friendly and dont have to worry about viruses or taking it in to fix it and also(impretty sure most would agree) the macs have the best designs. and u can also play some games on mac, not all, but most of the popular ones like WoW or SC2. macs are for more casual people rly.

Avatar image for paradigm68
paradigm68

5588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 paradigm68
Member since 2003 • 5588 Posts

[QUOTE="paradigm68"][QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

MACs are PCs!

what you meant to say was Windows vs Mac OSX

Fizzman

There's hardware differences to count in also.

no there isn't

How so? Comparing my MacBook to my friends XPS Gaming Laptop Thing, there's tons of differences there.
Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#69 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="paradigm68"] There's hardware differences to count in also. paradigm68

no there isn't

How so? Comparing my MacBook to my friends XPS Gaming Laptop Thing, there's tons of differences there.

I don't think you understand what the word hardware means.

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#70 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts

I don't think you understand what the word hardware means.

Fizzman
You probably aren't thinking specifically enough. There's more to hardware than CPUs and GPUs.
Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#71 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

I don't think you understand what the word hardware means.

musicalmac

You probably aren't thinking specifically enough. There's more to hardware than CPUs and GPUs.

Care to enlighten me?

Avatar image for Remmib
Remmib

2250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Remmib
Member since 2010 • 2250 Posts
Mac? :lol:
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#73 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts

Care to enlighten me?

Fizzman
Ambient light and motion sensors for a start. Then there's the keyboard design, construction, weight, trackpad, etc. So some parts are the same, some are not. Apple's laptops are like the Cadillac of the computer industry, regularly rated higher than other brands, even in Laptop mag.
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

they are quite diffrent rly, yeah macs r so much more expensive for the hardware they have compared to a pc of the same price, but the mac software doesnt need that much power to run it, and what ur paying with that extra money is for a reliable computer(my bros has lasted 6 years and still uses it lol) , which is more user friendly and dont have to worry about viruses or taking it in to fix it and also(impretty sure most would agree) the macs have the best designs. and u can also play some games on mac, not all, but most of the popular ones like WoW or SC2. macs are for more casual people rly.

RanDoMcApZ

Both Mactel and Wintel PC uses the same CPU and chipset architecture. Being Apple branded computer doesn't shield it from the infamous NVIDIA Geforce 8600M GT bump-gate.

3 Year Laptop Malfunction Rates. http://purplejunction.com/2009/11/20/3-year-laptop-malfunction-rates-asus-beats-out-apple/

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#75 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

Care to enlighten me?

musicalmac

Ambient light and motion sensors for a start. Then there's the keyboard design, construction, weight, trackpad, etc. So some parts are the same, some are not. Apple's laptops are like the Cadillac of the computer industry, regularly rated higher than other brands, even in Laptop mag.

Ohh by hardware I meant the parts at their core. CPU/GPU/HDD/Mobo. If i wanted a similar designed Windows based PC, I could buy a HP Envy or the equivelent "Cadillacs" from Sony or Dell. Those differences seem minor in the grand scheme of things.

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#76 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts

Ohh by hardware I meant the parts at their core. CPU/GPU/HDD/Mobo. If i wanted a similar designed Windows based PC, I could buy a HP Envy or the equivelent "Cadillacs" from Sony or Dell. Those differences seem minor in the grand scheme of things.

Fizzman
Nobody does unibody builds like Apple, not that I know of. Apple has some special patents to keep it that way, too. :P
Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#77 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

Ohh by hardware I meant the parts at their core. CPU/GPU/HDD/Mobo. If i wanted a similar designed Windows based PC, I could buy a HP Envy or the equivelent "Cadillacs" from Sony or Dell. Those differences seem minor in the grand scheme of things.

musicalmac

Nobody does unibody builds like Apple, not that I know of. Apple has some special patents to keep it that way, too. :P

IDK you are probably right. I know HP has a PC that basically looks like a Mac. Can't remember what it was called. I thought it was the Envy, but it might called something else.

Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

who the hell games on a mac? :|

Avatar image for paradigm68
paradigm68

5588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 paradigm68
Member since 2003 • 5588 Posts

[QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="Fizzman"] [QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="Fizzman"]

Care to enlighten me?

Fizzman

Ambient light and motion sensors for a start. Then there's the keyboard design, construction, weight, trackpad, etc. So some parts are the same, some are not. Apple's laptops are like the Cadillac of the computer industry, regularly rated higher than other brands, even in Laptop mag.

Ohh by hardware I meant the parts at their core. CPU/GPU/HDD/Mobo. If i wanted a similar designed Windows based PC, I could buy a HP Envy or the equivelent "Cadillacs" from Sony or Dell. Those differences seem minor in the grand scheme of things.

Well by hardware, I meant what it actual meant. Please don't tell me "I don't think you understand what the word hardware means." When you didn't seem to understand it...Whatever, good day sir. *walks off with top hat*

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#80 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts

IDK you are probably right. I know HP has a PC that basically looks like a Mac. Can't remember what it was called. I thought it was the Envy, but it might called something else.

Fizzman
Envy, you're right, I believe. Different construction.

who the hell games on a mac? :|

theuncharted34
Why not?
Avatar image for paradigm68
paradigm68

5588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 paradigm68
Member since 2003 • 5588 Posts

who the hell games on a mac? :|

theuncharted34
Tons of people, mostly people who won't to do more then game and try to fix issues.
Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

IDK you are probably right. I know HP has a PC that basically looks like a Mac. Can't remember what it was called. I thought it was the Envy, but it might called something else.

musicalmac

Envy, you're right, I believe. Different construction.

who the hell games on a mac? :|

theuncharted34

Why not?

because it costs twice as much as a pc and has a much more limited games library? (OSX)

doesn't really need to be discussed I'm afraid :)

Avatar image for fireballonfire
fireballonfire

891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 fireballonfire
Member since 2009 • 891 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] Except for the whole charging an arm and a leg for cheap PC parts. Like in the case of my friend getting 335 dollars worth of hardware for 1000 dollars from Apple. That is completely true.musicalmac
It's not that simple. It's so not that simple that it has me wondering if you're being entirely honest, or just the typical uneducated PC gamer guy.

So what it comes down to is, OS preference. MAC users are willing to sacrifice all the advantages of windows based PCs for the OSX?

Well I don't think I only speak for myself when I say this but, I thought as much.

fireballonfire

What am I sacrificing with my MacBook Pro? I really see it the other way around. I have three computers in one, and I can boot all three (OSX, Windows, Linux- lol) operating systems simultaneously if I want. If you're a power user, it's always handy to have more software abilities than less.

So I'm saying you're sacrificing advantages choosing a MAC, and you play that ball back to me claiming I miss out choosing a windows based PC.

Maybe it's as simple as we have different preferences when it comes to computers and their purpose.

I like building my computers myself. My latest build are made from arguably better quality components than you'd find in a MAC Pro. Antec makes really good PSUs, really good looking(much better looking than MAC Pros for sure) quality cases (it's nice with options right?). Asus is a really a high quality brand for Mobos and GPUs. Pair this with the latest intel CPU and slap in another Asus GPU for SLI or even tri-sli and what do you have?

A better looking, better quality system and much more power than you'd ever find in a MAC. The best part is that it's cheaper too.

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#84 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts

because it costs twice as much as a pc and has a much more limited games library? (OSX)

doesn't really need to be discussed I'm afraid :)

theuncharted34
Oh, I dunno. I play Windows games on my Mac all the time. Where have you been? lol
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

Ohh by hardware I meant the parts at their core. CPU/GPU/HDD/Mobo. If i wanted a similar designed Windows based PC, I could buy a HP Envy or the equivelent "Cadillacs" from Sony or Dell. Those differences seem minor in the grand scheme of things.

musicalmac

Nobody does unibody builds like Apple, not that I know of. Apple has some special patents to keep it that way, too. :P

MSI has unibody laptop design. Dell Adamo also sports an unibody laptop design.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3ngw5wWThY

Avatar image for paradigm68
paradigm68

5588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 paradigm68
Member since 2003 • 5588 Posts

[QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="Fizzman"] Envy, you're right, I believe. Different construction. [QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

who the hell games on a mac? :|

theuncharted34

Why not?

because it costs twice as much as a pc and has a much more limited games library? (OSX)

doesn't really need to be discussed I'm afraid :)

Sure, but that's all you do on any Computer? Game? How about those that do school, work, videos, photos, and more. You know does that stuff better right out of the box? Mac. So yeah if you somehow, some reason, all you do is game on a PC. Then yes the PC would be better. Think it through buddy.
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#87 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts

So I'm saying you're sacrificing advantages choosing a MAC, and you play that ball back to me claiming I miss out choosing a windows based PC.

Maybe it's as simple as we have different preferences when it comes to computers and their purpose.

I like building my computers myself. My latest build are made from arguably better quality components than you'd find in a MAC Pro. Antec makes really good PSUs, really good looking(much better looking than MAC Pros for sure) quality cases (it's nice with options right?). Asus is a really a high quality brand for Mobos and GPUs. Pair this with the latest intel CPU and slap in another Asus GPU for SLI or even tri-sli and what do you have?

A better looking, better quality system and much more power than you'd ever find in a MAC. The best part is that it's cheaper too.

fireballonfire
And that's fine, because you're very interested in hard-core PC gaming (or so I'm going to so boldly assume). I am interested in more than gaming, so Macs suit my needs more. I can still play the latest, greatest titles, just maybe not maxed out. ;)
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#88 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
MSI has unibody laptop design. Dell Adamo also sports an unibody laptop design.ronvalencia
As I said before, to my knowledge, Apple was the only company doing unibody designs. Perhaps those are identical, but I doubt it. Similar, perhaps.
Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#89 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

[QUOTE="musicalmac"] Why not?paradigm68

because it costs twice as much as a pc and has a much more limited games library? (OSX)

doesn't really need to be discussed I'm afraid :)

Sure, but that's all you do on any Computer? Game? How about those that do school, work, videos, photos, and more. You know does that stuff better right out of the box? Mac. So yeah if you somehow, some reason, all you do is game on a PC. Then yes the PC would be better. Think it through buddy.

Is that why in the corporate world the majority OS is Windows and Office? For school I use Office and its the best by far if you wanna compare it with IWork. There is a reason why MS makes a Mac compatible version of Office. Yes Windows baesd PC's are the best for gaming, but they are just as good in other area's too.

Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

[QUOTE="musicalmac"] Why not?paradigm68

because it costs twice as much as a pc and has a much more limited games library? (OSX)

doesn't really need to be discussed I'm afraid :)

Sure, but that's all you do on any Computer? Game? How about those that do school, work, videos, photos, and more. You know does that stuff better right out of the box? Mac. So yeah if you somehow, some reason, all you do is game on a PC. Then yes the PC would be better. Think it through buddy.

That was my point. A windows pc is much much better for gaming. And since this is gamespot and not photospot... :P why would we discuss anything else but games? this is system wars not OT.

Hold on. If I just so happen to want a mac, for the purposes you just listed, and wanted to play a little games on the side the mac is great.

EDIT: And btw. who says OSX is better than windows for photo's, school and video's? and work? and more?

Avatar image for paradigm68
paradigm68

5588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 paradigm68
Member since 2003 • 5588 Posts

[QUOTE="paradigm68"][QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

because it costs twice as much as a pc and has a much more limited games library? (OSX)

doesn't really need to be discussed I'm afraid :)

Fizzman

Sure, but that's all you do on any Computer? Game? How about those that do school, work, videos, photos, and more. You know does that stuff better right out of the box? Mac. So yeah if you somehow, some reason, all you do is game on a PC. Then yes the PC would be better. Think it through buddy.

Is that why in the corporate world the majority OS is Windows and Office? For school I use Office and its the best by far if you wanna compare it with IWork. There is a reason why MS makes a Mac compatible version of Office. Yes Windows baesd PC's are the best for gaming, but they are just as good in other area's too.

The "corporate world" uses PC as they are cheaper, they aren't using them to organize photos. Alright I'm going to eat dinner now with some family, enjoy the rest of the thread.
Avatar image for paradigm68
paradigm68

5588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 paradigm68
Member since 2003 • 5588 Posts

[QUOTE="paradigm68"][QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

because it costs twice as much as a pc and has a much more limited games library? (OSX)

doesn't really need to be discussed I'm afraid :)

theuncharted34

Sure, but that's all you do on any Computer? Game? How about those that do school, work, videos, photos, and more. You know does that stuff better right out of the box? Mac. So yeah if you somehow, some reason, all you do is game on a PC. Then yes the PC would be better. Think it through buddy.

That was my point. A windows pc is much much better for gaming. And since this is gamespot and not photospot... :P why would we discuss anything else but games? this is system wars not OT.

Hold on. If I just so happen to want a mac, for the purposes you just listed, and wanted to play a little games on the side the mac is great.

EDIT: And btw. who says OSX is better than windows for photo's, school and video's? and work? and more?

*sighs* Out of the box they are much better, and stuff like much better customer support, nearly no virues compared to PCs, and other little stuff, is what makes them better. As I said in my last post, gonna have dinner con family.
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="paradigm68"][QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

because it costs twice as much as a pc and has a much more limited games library? (OSX)

doesn't really need to be discussed I'm afraid :)

Fizzman

Sure, but that's all you do on any Computer? Game? How about those that do school, work, videos, photos, and more. You know does that stuff better right out of the box? Mac. So yeah if you somehow, some reason, all you do is game on a PC. Then yes the PC would be better. Think it through buddy.

Is that why in the corporate world the majority OS is Windows and Office? For school I use Office and its the best by far if you wanna compare it with IWork. There is a reason why MS makes a Mac compatible version of Office. Yes Windows baesd PC's are the best for gaming, but they are just as good in other area's too.

MS Office is not an issue for MacOS X e.g. I just use my MSDN/Technet subs for MacOS X(1) and Windows(2) MS Office installs.

1. Office for Mac Home and Business 2011.

2. Office Professional Plus 2010 or Office Standard 2010.

Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

HAX

Skip to 3:11 /thread.

:P

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] It's not that simple. It's so not that simple that it has me wondering if you're being entirely honest, or just the typical uneducated PC gamer guy. [QUOTE="fireballonfire"]

So what it comes down to is, OS preference. MAC users are willing to sacrifice all the advantages of windows based PCs for the OSX?

Well I don't think I only speak for myself when I say this but, I thought as much.

fireballonfire

What am I sacrificing with my MacBook Pro? I really see it the other way around. I have three computers in one, and I can boot all three (OSX, Windows, Linux- lol) operating systems simultaneously if I want. If you're a power user, it's always handy to have more software abilities than less.

So I'm saying you're sacrificing advantages choosing a MAC, and you play that ball back to me claiming I miss out choosing a windows based PC.

Maybe it's as simple as we have different preferences when it comes to computers and their purpose.

I like building my computers myself. My latest build are made from arguably better quality components than you'd find in a MAC Pro. Antec makes really good PSUs, really good looking(much better looking than MAC Pros for sure) quality cases (it's nice with options right?). Asus is a really a high quality brand for Mobos and GPUs. Pair this with the latest intel CPU and slap in another Asus GPU for SLI or even tri-sli and what do you have?

A better looking, better quality system and much more power than you'd ever find in a MAC. The best part is that it's cheaper too.

Current MacPros are Intel Xeon based workstations. Current Apple MacPro uses CrossFire config. For reliability, Intel Xeon based workstations are equiped ECC rams. For mission critical professional work, one should be using ECC type rams.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#97 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="paradigm68"] Sure, but that's all you do on any Computer? Game? How about those that do school, work, videos, photos, and more. You know does that stuff better right out of the box? Mac. So yeah if you somehow, some reason, all you do is game on a PC. Then yes the PC would be better. Think it through buddy. paradigm68

Is that why in the corporate world the majority OS is Windows and Office? For school I use Office and its the best by far if you wanna compare it with IWork. There is a reason why MS makes a Mac compatible version of Office. Yes Windows baesd PC's are the best for gaming, but they are just as good in other area's too.

The "corporate world" uses PC as they are cheaper, they aren't using them to organize photos. Alright I'm going to eat dinner now with some family, enjoy the rest of the thread.

Some corporates uses MacBooks or IMacs(X86) i.e. running Windows.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#98 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="paradigm68"] There's hardware differences to count in also. paradigm68

no there isn't

How so? Comparing my MacBook to my friends XPS Gaming Laptop Thing, there's tons of differences there.

Dell Studio XPS 1647 has the same Intel Core i7 Dual Core(+IGP)(Arrandale) as MacBook Pro. My Dell Studio XPS 1645 uses Intel Core i7 Quad Core (Clarksfield) type. The big difference is with the GPU.

I could probably replace my Core i7 Quad with Core i7 Dual Core + IGP(use for saving power during battery mode)i.e. both Arrandale and Clarksfield uses socket 988.

Avatar image for taterfrickintot
taterfrickintot

2851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#99 taterfrickintot
Member since 2008 • 2851 Posts

[QUOTE="Brownesque"]

[QUOTE="fireballonfire"]

MACs are wonderful computers with advantages overwindows based PCs.

Video editing, photoshopping, design work in general is smoother on the MACs.

fireballonfire

Smoother how?

Allright you caught me. I've never done any serious work on a MAC (net browsing). I just thought it was the general consensus, or maybe it's just an old argument that MAC users fall back on.

Any experienced MAC and WIN user that can shed some light on the matter?

I have been taking College level MultiMedia Classes that maily revolve around video editing. our primary computers are brand new iMacs, and we have around 18 in our classroom. i sm in the minority that prefers PC, mainly because amost everyone in my media class is like super rich, and have their parents buy them stuff. almost none of them really have any experience or knoledge about hardware.

Although the OSx snow leopard is a very good OS, windows 7 is just as good IMO. it really just depends on user preference. our primary video editing software for mac is final cut pro, and that software is superior to any PC video editor IMO, but i think that is just because i am more experienced with it than any PC video editor. i am growing fond of sony vegas though. we also use a lot of photoshop, and photoshop between PC and mac is pretty much identical.

Mac users pretty much fall back on the "mas are smoother for multimedia editing" because mac has that reputation and most Mac and PC fanboys really dont have much experience in this feild.

also sinse this is a gaming forum, windows is obviously a better choice for gaming. and IMO, the PC is better for the money hardware-wise. macs apple isnt the m,ost reliable computer maufacturer according to consumer reports so don't buy into that. the only reason to buy a mac is for its wide array of mac exclusive multimedia editors and the OS itself. other than that, PC is the safer choice among the casuals. or gamers. IMO.

Avatar image for oldkingallant
oldkingallant

4958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 oldkingallant
Member since 2010 • 4958 Posts

[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

So you are essentially saying PC Vs PC? Because Macs are just a custom type of personal computer.

They share the same hardware with PCs today, the only real difference is proprietary Apple software and the odd design direction differences.

1Stark1

Thank you, you just emphasized my point. PC isn't a unique platform hardware wise, its just an embodiment of current computing chips, hence it shouldn't be compared to set machines like consoles. So can we all agree its stupid to compare graphics of consoles to computers.

No :|. Because while playing Mass Effect 2 on my 360 I know I could be playing a superior version on my gaming PC. As long as the PC can play games and continues to get new ones, it is a legitimate platform to compare consoles to.