Paying $50 for 4 player laggy online

I'm talking about Gears of War. You pay money just so you can play a 4 player online game, that doesn't have dedicated servers, so the host server has the advantage if you lag. Many Gears players already complained about this alot.

When you can have 32 player dedicated online servers with War Hawk, and other PS3 games for free?

Where do all your money towards XboxLIve go?

Y must you continue :(Tjeremiah1988

Answer my question and I'll stop.

I'm talking about Gears of War. You pay money just so you can play a 4 player online game, that doesn't have dedicated servers, so the host server has the advantage if you lag. Many Gears players already complained about this alot.

When you can have 32 player dedicated online servers with War Hawk, and other PS3 games for free?

Where do all your money towards XboxLIve go?

Better_Day21

pretty sad post...so now all of a sudden gears is the only online game for x360?not everygame is perfect just look at R6V for PS3. but i mean you get more then online gamming with the 50 $....

Warhawk will flop , resistance had 40 players online and that game flopped go away troll.xjet039

It didn't flop by everyone but Gamespot. Gamepot underrated it, and they overrated Gears.

But that doesn't matter, explain to my where all your money you paid for Xboxlive go?

I raley have a lag game.

Warhawk will flop , resistance had 40 players online and that game flopped go away troll.xjet039

Where in your strange little fantasy world did this game flop?

Warhawk will flop , resistance had 40 players online and that game flopped go away troll.xjet039

resitance beats any online game on 360.

and warhack will be awesome and will only cost 40 dollars.

I'm talking about Gears of War. You pay money just so you can play a 4 player online game, that doesn't have dedicated servers, so the host server has the advantage if you lag. Many Gears players already complained about this alot.

When you can have 32 player dedicated online servers with War Hawk, and other PS3 games for free?

Where do all your money towards XboxLIve go?

Better_Day21

:lol: Wait a minute didnt you call yourself a hermit in your "Xbox live is a ripoff thread"

:lol: you make every cow besides Nobuo and assman look bad.

[QUOTE="xjet039"]Warhawk will flop , resistance had 40 players online and that game flopped go away troll.Better_Day21

It didn't flop by everyone but Gamespot. Gamepot underrated it, and they overrated Gears.

But that doesn't matter, explain to my where all your money you paid for Xboxlive go?

resistance 87% at gamerankings

http://gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/928399.asp?q=resistance

whydoes all good games have to be overated.

Warhawk will flop , resistance had 40 players online and that game flopped go away troll.xjet039

ok i was defending lemmings but you dont have to go fanboy side, i didnt and im a cow. you have no reason to think that warhawk will flop you just said it for some fanboyish reasons....

Pay more for a faster connection problem solved.

I pay absolutely nothing for XBL. I just create a new silver membership every month :PPalax

tahts a good idea but dont you care about achievements.

1: Gears of War is 8 player online not 4. It's not a run and gun game. It's a team based shooter. 4v4 lets the player feel like a part of the team and makes action much more tense and casualties devastating.

2: It's not laggy unless you have a crappy connection, or you join a game with crappy connection (that's why it has those bars on the far right...to tell you wether the game has good connection or bad connection). Host advantage is not a big deal if you are in a game with good connection.

3: Resistance did Flop. Sorry. check Gamerankings

4: Gears of War won many awards for a reason...and it is AAA at gamerankings so it is not overatted. You're just angry and jealous.

5: Your life as a fanboy must be sad.

[QUOTE="Palax"]I pay absolutely nothing for XBL. I just create a new silver membership every month :Pxjet039

tahts a good idea but dont you care about achievements.

Not that much apparently

I'm talking about Gears of War. You pay money just so you can play a 4 player online game, that doesn't have dedicated servers, so the host server has the advantage if you lag. Many Gears players already complained about this alot.

When you can have 32 player dedicated online servers with War Hawk, and other PS3 games for free?

Where do all your money towards XboxLIve go?

Better_Day21

[QUOTE="xjet039"]Warhawk will flop , resistance had 40 players online and that game flopped go away troll.ginglejangle

resitance beats any online game on 360.

and warhack will be awesome and will only cost 40 dollars.

Yeah, Gears is such an amazingly well designed game and it's fun...but the crappy online stability ruins is alot. I ask the same question. How can PSN be free and and lag-free, while XBL cost $50 and have issues like this. Maybe MS needs to make dedicated servers standard for all XBL games. I hope Gears 2 and Halo 3 has them :?.TREAL_Since

PSN has a very small user base so it going easy on the PSN servers. Sony would haveplanned the servers before the PS3 release soSony probably planned on selling alotmoreconsoles and for more people to use the PSN. Thats why i think people dont have lag yet.

No one knows how well the PSN would handle the same amount of users as the 360.

Yeah, Gears is such an amazingly well designed game and it's fun...but the crappy online stability ruins is alot. I ask the same question. How can PSN be free and and lag-free, while XBL cost $50 and have issues like this. Maybe MS needs to make dedicated servers standard for all XBL games. I hope Gears 2 and Halo 3 has them :?.TREAL_Since

Tell that to the grenade taggers and shotgun wh0rez.

You must mistake with PSN Lag. Thread FailsArt_424

[QUOTE="Better_Day21"]

[QUOTE="xjet039"]Warhawk will flop , resistance had 40 players online and that game flopped go away troll.xjet039

It didn't flop by everyone but Gamespot. Gamepot underrated it, and they overrated Gears.

But that doesn't matter, explain to my where all your money you paid for Xboxlive go?

resistance 87% at gamerankings

http://gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/928399.asp?q=resistance

whydoes all good games have to be overated.

why does the amount of fun YOU have with a game have to be confined to a score? 40 player Resistance sounds fun, not floppy.

I'm talking about Gears of War. You pay money just so you can play a 4 player online game, that doesn't have dedicated servers, so the host server has the advantage if you lag. Many Gears players already complained about this alot.

When you can have 32 player dedicated online servers with War Hawk, and other PS3 games for free?

Where do all your money towards XboxLIve go?

Better_Day21

Maybe it's because their download speed is bad?

i think im the xjet039 version of gears of war in sw. except i dont make threads.

i like how you said 4 player. proves you havent even played the game.

if you are going to complain about host advantage than host your own game. dont know why ppl are so afraid of fighting host. they do have slight advantage, but they can go down easily by playing smart. when i use to play a lot i got as many kills or more than the host even though the host was on the other team. i usually see ppl who arent good at gears whine and cry about the little things such as host advantage.

i seen ppl who had great connection played like they were the host. you should see the ppl who use fiber optic connection.

i find it funny how tc says he is a hermit just cause he has a icon of the longest journey and says he is. so obvious you are a cow. i hope you know that there are some ps3 games that uses p2p instead of servers.

its not 4, and having something like 32 players in a match of gears of war would be extremely stupid. PDZ has 32 players with no lag! omg!

Hey look 50 player online! http://www.gamespot.com/xbox/action/deltaforceblackhawkdown/index.html?tag=tabs;summary
and look how good that turned out to be.Super-Trooper

he he!

i think im the xjet039 version of gears of war in sw. except i dont make threads.

i like how you said 4 player. proves you havent even played the game.

if you are going to complain about host advantage than host your own game. dont know why ppl are so afraid of fighting host. they do have slight advantage, but they can go down easily by playing smart. when i use to play a lot i got as many kills or more than the host even though the host was on the other team. i usually see ppl who arent good at gears whine and cry about the little things such as host advantage.

i seen ppl who had great connection played like they were the host. you should see the ppl who use fiber optic connection.

i find it funny how tc says he is a hermit just cause he has a icon of the longest journey and says he is. so obvious you are a cow. i hope you know that there are some ps3 games that uses p2p instead of servers.

istreakforfood

I agree to the max.

Off topic: Can you give me the URL to that gif you use as your avatar?

LMAO.... its 8 player online btw. 4v4 is perfect for team based games.paranoiasurviva

In Gears of War's case, this is true. I couldn't imagine there being more than that for a game such as Gears.

I'm talking about Gears of War. You pay money just so you can play a 4 player online game, that doesn't have dedicated servers, so the host server has the advantage if you lag. Many Gears players already complained about this alot.

When you can have 32 player dedicated online servers with War Hawk, and other PS3 games for free?

Where do all your money towards XboxLIve go?

Better_Day21

YEs It would be damn stupid to buy xbox live just for gears of war.. I have it for the new demos(especially the online demos) andonline playand if my brother isnt downloading with bittorrent I never see a damn lag..

My online is good on XBL and my goes to MIcrosoftNo_Talent_Dev

What a deep, inspired post, complete with legible grammar.

[QUOTE="Tjeremiah1988"]Y must you continue :(Better_Day21

Answer my question and I'll stop.

GeOW has bad netcode, and is bug ridden.

While I hate XBL not having dedicated servers thats MSs problem, not Epics.

The game needs something other than just killing the other team, then winning as well as proper netcode that benefits the host, then gimps everyone else. Not to be glitch ridden and have more variety really.

If we're talking about content, the game feels really barren to me. *Shrug* But hey I haven't even got XBL at the moment and I probably won't for a while. Somebody hook me up with a free trial. ;D

[spoiler] I wish I was joking, is it can be free trials tiem now plz? [/spoiler]

MS will start to look reallystupid to charge for XBL once Home came out :wink: