You see....it's simple math.
If you pay $50 a year for a service....after so many games that you're not paying for....they start to be....free.
I know this concept is complicated....but -God- Nyadc...do try and keep up.
No, you're just paying an averaged out lower amount spread across the entire year, you're paying for it regardless of your rationalization.
Actually if you pay for a service and it gives you games......you'd be getting free games after you deduct the retail value. For instance if you pay $50 and download 5 games with a retail value of $10...any games after those 5 are actually free.
No it doesn't. It cost you money to be able to play those games.
ie. Not free.
You're not paying to play those games.
As I've said numerous times....ppl pay for PS+ or LIVE to play online....not the games.
The games are an extra incentive.
So, without PS+ you would have to pay for those games, by paying for PS+ you get those games.
There is a cost involved, therefore not free man. Incentive or not, the cost is what it is. Exactly the same as a 2 for 1 deal or discount on large volume trades. You are paying someone for the non-permanent privilege of being able to play games whilst your subscription is valid.
The games are an incentive, but one you are paying still for.
If it was free, then you wouldn't need to pay the subscription and could just grab it from a non-payed for Playstation Network.
Whatever.
It's just a good fucking deal.
So I don't care about these semantics.
Log in to comment