Pc = freedom and independence

  • 112 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for pitty8982
pitty8982

1072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 pitty8982
Member since 2008 • 1072 Posts

I don't know who said that, but to me it has a strong true meaning.

Consoles, wanting it or not, have lots of restrictions, they're a closed world, while Pc is a total open world.

It has one defect, though, but it's not "its" fault: devs focus on making games for consoles, maxing them out as much as they can. but it's not their fault either.

whose fault is it, then? The answer is already in the title of the topic.

Pc may not be the landmark in gaming, but it's the landmark in giving the people freedom and independence.

thoughts?

Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

how is the PC not a landmark in gaming ?-- best graphics, most highest rated game, exclusives or otherwise, most diverse, customizable etc etc

besides this I agree that freedom and independence is a good part of PC gaming

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

I don't know who said that, but to me it has a strong true meaning.

Consoles, wanting it or not, have lots of restrictions, they're a closed world, while Pc is a total open world.

It has one defect, though, but it's not "its" fault: devs focus on making games for consoles, maxing them out as much as they can. but it's not their fault either.

whose fault is it, then? The answer is already in the title of the topic.

Pc may not be the landmark in gaming, but it's the landmark in giving the people freedom and independence.

thoughts?

pitty8982
Because the PS3 is better. JK lol. While Windows itself is not open source, many *nix systems are. So you can do whatever you want with them. Also gamespot system wars users are stupid and just say things I don't have 1000$ I just sigh. So I don't go to system wars.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

It's pretty common knowledge for any long time PC gamer.

PC is an open platform because it has no owner, but as a result of having no owner it doesn't have anyone to champion the platform like consoles.

PC has to stand on its own two feet, everything it has is a result of the platforms own individual merits. Consoles by comparison owe the majority of their success to the activity of the 1st party, Playstation 3 in particular owes allot of its current position to Sony's activity.

Avatar image for FanaFall
FanaFall

275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 FanaFall
Member since 2009 • 275 Posts

starcraft

Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts

how is the PC not a landmark in gaming ?-- best graphics, most highest rated game, exclusives or otherwise, most diverse, customizable etc etc

besides this I agree that freedom and independence is a good part of PC gaming

naval

I totally agree.

Avatar image for bandicoot89
bandicoot89

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 bandicoot89
Member since 2009 • 437 Posts
thoughts : how is the PC not a landmark in gaming --- best graphics, most highest rated game, exclusives or otherwise, most diverse, customizable etc etcnaval
it's not the landmark in gaming, since its power is barely ever exploited. no wonder Nvidia is giving up, they even have to make their own demos to show the new video card's potential. consoles are the landmark in gaming, see Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, Geow, Forza Motorsport 3 etc.. Of course these devs can benefit from a lot of support by Ms or Sony.. meaning lots of investment. Crysis is just an exception, deal with it.
Avatar image for SLIisaownsystem
SLIisaownsystem

964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 SLIisaownsystem
Member since 2009 • 964 Posts

on pc every game has a own online client and youre still able to using something like hamashi or garena as an alternative, on consoles you have only psn and live which cost even something. And you can using any chatprogram you want like xfire, steam or from the game itself.

We dont have even a norm for our gamingboxes people still releasing games in normal cd boxes or this big cardboard box lol.

Avatar image for PublicNuisance
PublicNuisance

4582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#10 PublicNuisance
Member since 2009 • 4582 Posts

[QUOTE="naval"]thoughts : how is the PC not a landmark in gaming --- best graphics, most highest rated game, exclusives or otherwise, most diverse, customizable etc etcbandicoot89
it's not the landmark in gaming, since its power is barely ever exploited. no wonder Nvidia is giving up, they even have to make their own demos to show the new video card's potential. consoles are the landmark in gaming, see Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, Geow, Forza Motorsport 3 etc.. Of course these devs can benefit from a lot of support by Ms or Sony.. meaning lots of investment. Crysis is just an exception, deal with it.

So the landmark of gaming is mediocrity ?

Avatar image for Burning-Sludge
Burning-Sludge

4068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Burning-Sludge
Member since 2008 • 4068 Posts

I have to agree with you there TC and I will be right with you on playing PC games as soon as figure out how to use the command prompt.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

Another disadvantage of not having a representative of the platform. People are free to throw out any ignorant comments and misinformation they want; and there isn't an authority to respond to them.

Yes I'm talking about some of the responses in this thread, stop failing so hard.

Avatar image for pitty8982
pitty8982

1072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 pitty8982
Member since 2008 • 1072 Posts

[QUOTE="bandicoot89"][QUOTE="naval"] [QUOTE="PublicNuisance"]

[QUOTE="bandicoot89"][QUOTE="naval"]thoughts : how is the PC not a landmark in gaming --- best graphics, most highest rated game, exclusives or otherwise, most diverse, customizable etc etcPublicNuisance

it's not the landmark in gaming, since its power is barely ever exploited. no wonder Nvidia is giving up, they even have to make their own demos to show the new video card's potential. consoles are the landmark in gaming, see Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, Geow, Forza Motorsport 3 etc.. Of course these devs can benefit from a lot of support by Ms or Sony.. meaning lots of investment. Crysis is just an exception, deal with it.

So the landmark of gaming is mediocrity ?

mediocrity? care to explain?

Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts
[QUOTE="naval"]thoughts : how is the PC not a landmark in gaming --- best graphics, most highest rated game, exclusives or otherwise, most diverse, customizable etc etcbandicoot89
it's not the landmark in gaming, since its power is barely ever exploited. no wonder Nvidia is giving up, they even have to make their own demos to show the new video card's potential. consoles are the landmark in gaming, see Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, Geow, Forza Motorsport 3 etc.. Of course these devs can benefit from a lot of support by Ms or Sony.. meaning lots of investment. Crysis is just an exception, deal with it.

Please don't try to pas all rumours as fact , as it's generally difficult to take things seriously after that. Nvidia is not giving up anytime soon. there are quite a few Pc games better looks than the ones you listed -- like Crysis, Stalker, Arma 2 etc and there are more games than that whic hmake full use of the capablity of PC like Empire total War, WiC, Anno etc --- deal with it. Also, if you think landmark in gaming is based on graphics then :lol: is all I have to say
Avatar image for Snagal123
Snagal123

3524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Snagal123
Member since 2006 • 3524 Posts

I always have and always will be a PC gamer, but the fact is PC gaming is not for everyone...but thats their loss :P

Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

Another disadvantage of not having a representative of the platform. People are free to throw out any ignorant comments and misinformation they want; and there isn't an authority to respond to them.

Yes I'm talking about some of the responses in this thread, stop failing so hard.

AnnoyedDragon
I would say more like there is no 1st party to start the hype train beyond which some people cannot see
Avatar image for GoldenAngel03
GoldenAngel03

83

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 GoldenAngel03
Member since 2009 • 83 Posts
IMO it sucks. i tryed to get into it but i cant. its a mess. and the best games are on consoles like the FF, god of war, uncharted and so on. and you need to keep upgrading and do all that ****, and thers a bunch of problems behind it, its a mess to play there. and i dont like to play on a monitor right in front of it, yeah i know dont say what your going to say. a console like ps3, costs 299$ and lasts you for around 6 years or so. no need to upgrade to worry with all the ammount of crap related with it. its great. just get home, one click on the dualshock, its on, choose a great game and your ready to go. just sit on the couuch, bed or whatever enjoying it.
Avatar image for SLIisaownsystem
SLIisaownsystem

964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 SLIisaownsystem
Member since 2009 • 964 Posts

a console like ps3, costs 299$ and lasts you for around 6 years or so. GoldenAngel03

no it dont. The ps3 give you no information on what settings the game runs. You can also do this and get a gt9500 and ignore all the settings and keep playing it for 5 years.

Avatar image for pitty8982
pitty8982

1072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 pitty8982
Member since 2008 • 1072 Posts
[QUOTE="GoldenAngel03"]IMO it sucks. i tryed to get into it but i cant. its a mess. and the best games are on consoles like the FF, god of war, uncharted and so on. and you need to keep upgrading and do all that ****, and thers a bunch of problems behind it, its a mess to play there. and i dont like to play on a monitor right in front of it, yeah i know dont say what your going to say. a console like ps3, costs 299$ and lasts you for around 6 years or so. no need to upgrade to worry with all the ammount of crap related with it. its great. just get home, one click on the dualshock, its on, choose a great game and your ready to go. just sit on the couuch, bed or whatever enjoying it.

provided that you have a HD tv.. because if you don't, you spend at least..say 1000 euros? 150$ and I get a video card for my pc and I'm done. I pay my games 20-30% less than you do. The truth is people are lazy, want easy things, so the big companies lucrate over console gaming. oh, right..I forgot to mention how expensive the accessorie for your beloved consoles are!
Avatar image for mo0ksi
mo0ksi

12337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#20 mo0ksi
Member since 2007 • 12337 Posts
Freedom and independence can be both a good and bad thing. Some gamers just like convenience and it's ultimately why they may prefer a console. PC is not for everyone, but personally I haven't been more occupied with one system since the good ol' SNES days. I think it's the ideal gaming system. I just wish there weren't so many misconceptions about it.
Avatar image for nmaharg
nmaharg

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 nmaharg
Member since 2004 • 3285 Posts

PC gaming once was something I defended and called great. As of late it's on a major decline. It's not worth the extra hassle anymore imo. I just wish more console games had true 1080p.

Avatar image for GoldenAngel03
GoldenAngel03

83

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 GoldenAngel03
Member since 2009 • 83 Posts

[QUOTE="GoldenAngel03"] a console like ps3, costs 299$ and lasts you for around 6 years or so. SLIisaownsystem

no it dont. The ps3 give you no information on what settings the game runs. You can also do this and get a gt9500 and ignore all the settings and keep playing it for 5 years.

who cares if it give no information. all i know it looks great and IMO better than anything on PC. no need for crysis pics iv seen enough, not impressed. who cares about what setting it runs. and who cares about getting a gt9500 or whatever it is, everything is easier with a ps3. and i doubt you can run crysis on max settings with a PC that only costed 299$. for 299$ you dont get better than a ps3 to play games. no need to buy extra stuff, like all of that crap, plus a gamepad if you dont like to play on keyboard and other craps. for me PC is for internet and work, consoles are for gaming. period.
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

PC gaming once was something I defended and called great. As of late it's on a major decline. It's not worth the extra hassle anymore imo. I just wish more console games had true 1080p.

nmaharg

Maybe PC not declined, but instead Console got better?

Avatar image for Valiant_Rebel
Valiant_Rebel

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Valiant_Rebel
Member since 2009 • 4197 Posts

IMO it sucks. i tryed to get into it but i cant. its a mess. and the best games are on consoles like the FF, god of war, uncharted and so on. and you need to keep upgrading and do all that ****, and thers a bunch of problems behind it, its a mess to play there. and i dont like to play on a monitor right in front of it, yeah i know dont say what your going to say. a console like ps3, costs 299$ and lasts you for around 6 years or so. no need to upgrade to worry with all the ammount of crap related with it. its great. just get home, one click on the dualshock, its on, choose a great game and your ready to go. just sit on the couuch, bed or whatever enjoying it.GoldenAngel03

You do realize you can hook a PC to a TV like a console, right? And by problems, what do you mean? You just say it's a mess like it's impossible. It's not that hard to ask for assistance when building a PC. There is great value to be found when getting your own rig, but to each his own, I guess.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="SLIisaownsystem"]

[QUOTE="GoldenAngel03"] a console like ps3, costs 299$ and lasts you for around 6 years or so. GoldenAngel03

no it dont. The ps3 give you no information on what settings the game runs. You can also do this and get a gt9500 and ignore all the settings and keep playing it for 5 years.

who cares if it give no information. all i know it looks great and IMO better than anything on PC. no need for crysis pics iv seen enough, not impressed. who cares about what setting it runs. and who cares about getting a gt9500 or whatever it is, everything is easier with a ps3. and i doubt you can run crysis on max settings with a PC that only costed 299$. for 299$ you dont get better than a ps3 to play games. no need to buy extra stuff, like all of that crap, plus a gamepad if you dont like to play on keyboard and other craps. for me PC is for internet and work, consoles are for gaming. period.

Your gamepad argument is the oldest and weakest in the book... since you can even plug a X360 controler.

Pc is worth it and i'll agree a PS3 has great value for it's price.

Avatar image for pitty8982
pitty8982

1072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 pitty8982
Member since 2008 • 1072 Posts

[QUOTE="nmaharg"]

PC gaming once was something I defended and called great. As of late it's on a major decline. It's not worth the extra hassle anymore imo. I just wish more console games had true 1080p.

Bebi_vegeta

Maybe PC not declined, but instead Console got better?

now THAT is a good question.
Avatar image for nmaharg
nmaharg

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 nmaharg
Member since 2004 • 3285 Posts

[QUOTE="nmaharg"]

PC gaming once was something I defended and called great. As of late it's on a major decline. It's not worth the extra hassle anymore imo. I just wish more console games had true 1080p.

Bebi_vegeta

Maybe PC not declined, but instead Console got better?

Could be that as well. Imo it seems over the last 2-3 years PC gaming hasn't taken a step forward. Maybe thats due to the failure of vista and DX10. Hopefully Win 7 and DX 11 changes that. I would love to get back into PC gaming, but until BF3 or SW TOR I don't see it happening.
Avatar image for GoldenAngel03
GoldenAngel03

83

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 GoldenAngel03
Member since 2009 • 83 Posts
[QUOTE="pitty8982"][QUOTE="GoldenAngel03"]IMO it sucks. i tryed to get into it but i cant. its a mess. and the best games are on consoles like the FF, god of war, uncharted and so on. and you need to keep upgrading and do all that ****, and thers a bunch of problems behind it, its a mess to play there. and i dont like to play on a monitor right in front of it, yeah i know dont say what your going to say. a console like ps3, costs 299$ and lasts you for around 6 years or so. no need to upgrade to worry with all the ammount of crap related with it. its great. just get home, one click on the dualshock, its on, choose a great game and your ready to go. just sit on the couuch, bed or whatever enjoying it.

provided that you have a HD tv.. because if you don't, you spend at least..say 1000 euros? 150$ and I get a video card for my pc and I'm done. I pay my games 20-30% less than you do. The truth is people are lazy, want easy things, so the big companies lucrate over console gaming. oh, right..I forgot to mention how expensive the accessorie for your beloved consoles are!

the games look great with no need for an HDTV. but of course its better on an HDTV, but what about pc monitors?? you need to pay a lot for a good monitor too dont you. i doubt you like to play in a small screen. and btw i always buy my games for 29$,,they arent that expensive as you can see. and yes they are brand new. anyway im not arguing with you, you like PC gaming fine. i prefer consoe gaming.
Avatar image for pitty8982
pitty8982

1072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 pitty8982
Member since 2008 • 1072 Posts

[QUOTE="pitty8982"][QUOTE="GoldenAngel03"] [QUOTE="GoldenAngel03"][QUOTE="pitty8982"][QUOTE="GoldenAngel03"]IMO it sucks. i tryed to get into it but i cant. its a mess. and the best games are on consoles like the FF, god of war, uncharted and so on. and you need to keep upgrading and do all that ****, and thers a bunch of problems behind it, its a mess to play there. and i dont like to play on a monitor right in front of it, yeah i know dont say what your going to say. a console like ps3, costs 299$ and lasts you for around 6 years or so. no need to upgrade to worry with all the ammount of crap related with it. its great. just get home, one click on the dualshock, its on, choose a great game and your ready to go. just sit on the couuch, bed or whatever enjoying it.GoldenAngel03
provided that you have a HD tv.. because if you don't, you spend at least..say 1000 euros? 150$ and I get a video card for my pc and I'm done. I pay my games 20-30% less than you do. The truth is people are lazy, want easy things, so the big companies lucrate over console gaming. oh, right..I forgot to mention how expensive the accessorie for your beloved consoles are!

the games look great with no need for an HDTV. but of course its better on an HDTV, but what about pc monitors?? you need to pay a lot for a good monitor too dont you. i doubt you like to play in a small screen. and btw i always buy my games for 29$,,they arent that expensive as you can see. and yes they are brand new. anyway im not arguing with you, you like PC gaming fine. i prefer consoe gaming.

okay, I see your point, but you'll agree with me that console's accessories and games cost a king's ransom, won't you? it's a shame..come on!

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

Maybe PC not declined, but instead Console got better?

Bebi_vegeta

I actually think all platforms declined, the difference between console and PC being that consoles have a 1st party to hide the impact.

All platforms lost a large quantity of exclusives this generation, the reason being rising content development costs. There are far less games that can afford to stay exclusive and take advantage of the individual merits of each platform, in PCs case its hardware advantage.

This wouldn't have made PC look bad because the exact same thing is happening to 360 and PS3. In fact it would have put PC in the advantage, the reason being all platforms would share the same cross platform games; all of which would look and run better on PC.

However games that by every right shouldn't exist started appearing, high budget exclusives that take full advantage of a platform. These games should be going cross platform to accommodate their high costs, however Microsoft and Sony are funding these games and keeping them exclusive. Pretty much every game a Cow would try to use in an argument against PC is a Sony funded title, Killzone 2 and Heavy Rain wouldn't exist exclusively in their current form without Sony's funding.

So that's the way I see it. We are all in the same boat, it is simply PC is on its own while consoles are getting support from their owners to hide their similar condition.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

Maybe PC not declined, but instead Console got better?

AnnoyedDragon

I actually think all platforms declined, the difference between console and PC being that consoles have a 1st party to hide the impact.

All platforms lost a large quantity of exclusives this generation, the reason being rising content development costs. There are far less games that can afford to stay exclusive and take advantage of the individual merits of each platform, in PCs case its hardware advantage.

This wouldn't have made PC look bad because the exact same thing is happening to 360 and PS3. In fact it would have put PC in the advantage, the reason being all platforms would share the same cross platform games; all of which would look and run better on PC.

However games that by every right shouldn't exist started appearing, high budget exclusives that take full advantage of a platform. These games should be going cross platform to accommodate their high costs, however Microsoft and Sony are funding these games and keeping them exclusive. Pretty much every game a Cow would try to use in an argument against PC is a Sony funded title, Killzone 2 and Heavy Rain wouldn't exist exclusively in their current form without Sony's funding.

So that's the way I see it. We are all in the same boat, it is simply PC is on its own while consoles are getting support from their owners to hide their similar condition.

The way I see it, console of today look more and more like PCs, they have better online community then previous consoles... which makes a world of difference.

Avatar image for bandicoot89
bandicoot89

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 bandicoot89
Member since 2009 • 437 Posts

[QUOTE="GoldenAngel03"][QUOTE="pitty8982"] provided that you have a HD tv.. because if you don't, you spend at least..say 1000 euros? 150$ and I get a video card for my pc and I'm done. I pay my games 20-30% less than you do. The truth is people are lazy, want easy things, so the big companies lucrate over console gaming. oh, right..I forgot to mention how expensive the accessorie for your beloved consoles are!pitty8982

the games look great with no need for an HDTV. but of course its better on an HDTV, but what about pc monitors?? you need to pay a lot for a good monitor too dont you. i doubt you like to play in a small screen. and btw i always buy my games for 29$,,they arent that expensive as you can see. and yes they are brand new. anyway im not arguing with you, you like PC gaming fine. i prefer consoe gaming.

okay, I see your point, but you'll agree with me that console's accessories and games cost a king's ransom, won't you? it's a shame..come on!

ps2+ god of war + god of war 2 + tekken 4 + tekken 5 + gran turismo 4 + dragon quest VIII + final fantasy X + ico + shadow of the colossus + gta st andreas + gta vice city + resident evil 4 + okami = 100 euros.
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#33 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
When you people say pc has declined, please say pc gaming... The Linux kernel has gotten so big and lovely, same for the freebsd kernel :D They just keep getting better, so good I stopped using Windows completely on my laptop and now use Freebsd or Debian on it :D
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#34 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
[QUOTE="pitty8982"]

[QUOTE="GoldenAngel03"] the games look great with no need for an HDTV. but of course its better on an HDTV, but what about pc monitors?? you need to pay a lot for a good monitor too dont you. i doubt you like to play in a small screen. and btw i always buy my games for 29$,,they arent that expensive as you can see. and yes they are brand new. anyway im not arguing with you, you like PC gaming fine. i prefer consoe gaming.bandicoot89

okay, I see your point, but you'll agree with me that console's accessories and games cost a king's ransom, won't you? it's a shame..come on!

ps2+ god of war + god of war 2 + tekken 4 + tekken 5 + gran turismo 4 + dragon quest VIII + final fantasy X + ico + shadow of the colossus + gta st andreas + gta vice city + resident evil 4 + okami = 100 euros.

Uh name one of those that are good: PC: The best raicng sims, iracing, gtr2, grand turismo is a joke compared to those. Fighters, yawn. Final fantasy? I am heterosexual I don't like rpgs I only like shooters, you have nothing.
Avatar image for kidcool189
kidcool189

4307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 kidcool189
Member since 2008 • 4307 Posts

[QUOTE="bandicoot89"][QUOTE="pitty8982"]

okay, I see your point, but you'll agree with me that console's accessories and games cost a king's ransom, won't you? it's a shame..come on!

JigglyWiggly_

ps2+ god of war + god of war 2 + tekken 4 + tekken 5 + gran turismo 4 + dragon quest VIII + final fantasy X + ico + shadow of the colossus + gta st andreas + gta vice city + resident evil 4 + okami = 100 euros.

Uh name one of those that are good: PC: The best raicng sims, iracing, gtr2, grand turismo is a joke compared to those. Fighters, yawn. Final fantasy? I am heterosexual I don't like rpgs I only like shooters, you have nothing.

whether u like them or not doesn't change the fact that they are objectively good/great games

Avatar image for HenriH-42
HenriH-42

2113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#36 HenriH-42
Member since 2007 • 2113 Posts

Agreed, PC is the only truly free platform, but it comes with some drawbacks. Without any big company to hype and market it, there are some serious misconseptions about it (for example, see any SW thread that has PC vs consoles). Also the fact that you can just buy a game for a console and you know it will work on your console is a serious advantage over the PC and its different hardware combinations.

Other than that, I have nothing to complain about. It's my favorite platform and by the looks of it, it will be the only one I'll ever need.

Avatar image for bandicoot89
bandicoot89

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 bandicoot89
Member since 2009 • 437 Posts

Agreed, PC is the only truly free platform, but it comes with some drawbacks. Without any big company to hype and market it, there are some serious misconseptions about it (for example, see any SW thread that has PC vs consoles). Also the fact that you can just buy a game for a console and you know it will work on your console is a serious advantage over the PC and its different hardware combinations.

Other than that, I have nothing to complain about. It's my favorite platform and by the looks of it, it will be the only one I'll ever need.

HenriH-42
agreed
Avatar image for dc337
dc337

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 dc337
Member since 2008 • 2603 Posts

[QUOTE="GoldenAngel03"]IMO it sucks. i tryed to get into it but i cant. its a mess. and the best games are on consoles like the FF, god of war, uncharted and so on. and you need to keep upgrading and do all that ****, and thers a bunch of problems behind it, its a mess to play there. and i dont like to play on a monitor right in front of it, yeah i know dont say what your going to say. a console like ps3, costs 299$ and lasts you for around 6 years or so. no need to upgrade to worry with all the ammount of crap related with it. its great. just get home, one click on the dualshock, its on, choose a great game and your ready to go. just sit on the couuch, bed or whatever enjoying it.Valiant_Rebel

You do realize you can hook a PC to a TV like a console, right? And by problems, what do you mean? You just say it's a mess like it's impossible. It's not that hard to ask for assistance when building a PC. There is great value to be found when getting your own rig, but to each his own, I guess.

It is a mess because it isn't designed to be integrated with your home entertainment system. What happens if you want to type a paper at a desk? Swap out the pc? Sounds like fun. With the ps3/360 you can turn on the console, buy games and movies all with the controller. With the pc you have to mess with serials, drivers, multiple online accounts, etc. It's just a smoother experience with the consoles. Besides the better pc exclusives aren't designed to be played with the controller. I'd rather play them at a desk where they are meant to be played.

Avatar image for dc337
dc337

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 dc337
Member since 2008 • 2603 Posts

When you people say pc has declined, please say pc gaming... The Linux kernel has gotten so big and lovely, same for the freebsd kernel :D They just keep getting better, so good I stopped using Windows completely on my laptop and now use Freebsd or Debian on it :DJigglyWiggly_
Compared to Linux on the desktop pc gaming is doing just fine.

But I do think that pc gaming has declined in some areas, like single player rpgs and shooters designed around pc hardware. Other areas are doing fine though like rts and mmorpgs.

It's pretty shocking to see the pc games selection at retail stores. The casuals have definitely taken over hard copy sales.

Avatar image for devious742
devious742

3924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 devious742
Member since 2003 • 3924 Posts

[QUOTE="Valiant_Rebel"]

[QUOTE="GoldenAngel03"]IMO it sucks. i tryed to get into it but i cant. its a mess. and the best games are on consoles like the FF, god of war, uncharted and so on. and you need to keep upgrading and do all that ****, and thers a bunch of problems behind it, its a mess to play there. and i dont like to play on a monitor right in front of it, yeah i know dont say what your going to say. a console like ps3, costs 299$ and lasts you for around 6 years or so. no need to upgrade to worry with all the ammount of crap related with it. its great. just get home, one click on the dualshock, its on, choose a great game and your ready to go. just sit on the couuch, bed or whatever enjoying it.dc337

You do realize you can hook a PC to a TV like a console, right? And by problems, what do you mean? You just say it's a mess like it's impossible. It's not that hard to ask for assistance when building a PC. There is great value to be found when getting your own rig, but to each his own, I guess.

It is a mess because it isn't designed to be integrated with your home entertainment system. What happens if you want to type a paper at a desk? Swap out the pc? Sounds like fun. With the ps3/360 you can turn on the console, buy games and movies all with the controller. With the pc you have to mess with serials, drivers, multiple online accounts, etc. It's just a smoother experience with the consoles. Besides the better pc exclusives aren't designed to be played with the controller. I'd rather play them at a desk where they are meant to be played.

i was going to respond but then i noticed it was dc337 :lol:

Avatar image for bandicoot89
bandicoot89

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 bandicoot89
Member since 2009 • 437 Posts

[QUOTE="Valiant_Rebel"]

[QUOTE="GoldenAngel03"]IMO it sucks. i tryed to get into it but i cant. its a mess. and the best games are on consoles like the FF, god of war, uncharted and so on. and you need to keep upgrading and do all that ****, and thers a bunch of problems behind it, its a mess to play there. and i dont like to play on a monitor right in front of it, yeah i know dont say what your going to say. a console like ps3, costs 299$ and lasts you for around 6 years or so. no need to upgrade to worry with all the ammount of crap related with it. its great. just get home, one click on the dualshock, its on, choose a great game and your ready to go. just sit on the couuch, bed or whatever enjoying it.dc337

You do realize you can hook a PC to a TV like a console, right? And by problems, what do you mean? You just say it's a mess like it's impossible. It's not that hard to ask for assistance when building a PC. There is great value to be found when getting your own rig, but to each his own, I guess.

It is a mess because it isn't designed to be integrated with your home entertainment system. What happens if you want to type a paper at a desk? Swap out the pc? Sounds like fun. With the ps3/360 you can turn on the console, buy games and movies all with the controller. With the pc you have to mess with serials, drivers, multiple online accounts, etc. It's just a smoother experience with the consoles. Besides the better pc exclusives aren't designed to be played with the controller. I'd rather play them at a desk where they are meant to be played.

true
Avatar image for badtaker
badtaker

3806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 badtaker
Member since 2009 • 3806 Posts

[QUOTE="GoldenAngel03"] a console like ps3, costs 299$ and lasts you for around 6 years or so. SLIisaownsystem

Do you Play PS3 On your butt. 299+Tv=400 or 500 or 600 ..... lol. Some people are idiots

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

And piracy is destroying the PC....good luck with that freedom and independence when no devs make enough money to make ends meet except the largest, and even they have huge problems.


Freedom isn't free, it requires rules, and laws and boundries to work, if freedom were truely free and you could do whatever you want then you'd get what the majority of the time is a cess pit of piracy like the PC is filled with....I.E people would murder and steal and do whatever they want if there truely were no boundries humans aren't like much for a moral compass.

Avatar image for badtaker
badtaker

3806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 badtaker
Member since 2009 • 3806 Posts

[QUOTE="pitty8982"]

[QUOTE="GoldenAngel03"] the games look great with no need for an HDTV. but of course its better on an HDTV, but what about pc monitors?? you need to pay a lot for a good monitor too dont you. i doubt you like to play in a small screen. and btw i always buy my games for 29$,,they arent that expensive as you can see. and yes they are brand new. anyway im not arguing with you, you like PC gaming fine. i prefer consoe gaming.bandicoot89

okay, I see your point, but you'll agree with me that console's accessories and games cost a king's ransom, won't you? it's a shame..come on!

ps2+ god of war + god of war 2 + tekken 4 + tekken 5 + gran turismo 4 + dragon quest VIII + final fantasy X + ico + shadow of the colossus + gta st andreas + gta vice city + resident evil 4 + okami = 100 euros.

One Word : PCSX2

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#45 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

And piracy is destroying the PC....good luck with that freedom and independence when no devs make enough money to make ends meet except the largest, and even they have huge problems.

WilliamRLBaker

Except it's not. Piracy has always been a problem and somehow it didn't destroy PCgaming. And you got it completely backwards. Freedom and independence makes it possible for small devs to survive and make enough money. While it's simply impossible on consoles. Piracy might be smaller on consoles, but currently it's virtually impossible for any smaller dev to survive on consoles, only the huge ones have any chance and even they are failing. It's simply becoming impossible for a developer to survive on their own in console market, they all either go bancrupt or get bought by some large company. Indepenent developers (not just indie, but generaly those who aren't owned by other entitity) are becoming extinct on consoles. There hardly are any of them left.


While on PC majority of devs are still independent and they are making enough money to make ends. Thus piracy is a huge problem, it's not a fatal one

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

[QUOTE="dc337"]

[QUOTE="Valiant_Rebel"]

You do realize you can hook a PC to a TV like a console, right? And by problems, what do you mean? You just say it's a mess like it's impossible. It's not that hard to ask for assistance when building a PC. There is great value to be found when getting your own rig, but to each his own, I guess.

devious742

It is a mess because it isn't designed to be integrated with your home entertainment system. What happens if you want to type a paper at a desk? Swap out the pc? Sounds like fun. With the ps3/360 you can turn on the console, buy games and movies all with the controller. With the pc you have to mess with serials, drivers, multiple online accounts, etc. It's just a smoother experience with the consoles. Besides the better pc exclusives aren't designed to be played with the controller. I'd rather play them at a desk where they are meant to be played.

i was going to respond but then i noticed it was dc337 :lol:

Do you actually have anything to say about his argument, or just a pure ad hominem dismissal? The things he's talking about are all true, and the worst part is that there's absolutely NO GOOD REASON why the PC can't do them. All of those things are easier on a console because it has a purpose-built interface, common hardware, and a single set of services across every title on the platform. But the PC doesn't have that, because that takes away the gamer's choices. You'd have to run a very limited subset of hardware, have a very limited selection of input devices, have settings chosen for performance on least-common-denominator hardware... a bunch of limitations on the experience that PC gamers simply aren't willing to accept. But console users are willing, because in exchange, there's almost zero effort in between us and getting into a game. You've decided which end of the tradeoff is best suited for you, and that's fine. Just don't forget that the other side of the argument is perfectly valid as well. (Oh, and fellow consolites: next time you feel the urge to say "have fun tweaking settings while we're playing games", remember that this statement applies to you too.)
Avatar image for dc337
dc337

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 dc337
Member since 2008 • 2603 Posts

fixed :lol: btw i dont think that about consoles.. im just acting like Dc337 :P

devious742

Yawn. I know I make pc elitism difficult by showing how silly it is but you don't have to develop a personal grudge.

Maybe you should go frap a delayed multiplat in 1900x1200 so you can convince yourself that pc gaming is just as good as ever.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts


But I do think that pc gaming has declined in some areas, like single player rpgs and shooters designed around pc hardware.

dc337

Tbh i'd disagree.

Its not any worse than last generation.

Especially with titles like Risen and ArmA II arriving of recent.

It's pretty shocking to see the pc games selection at retail stores. The casuals have definitely taken over hard copy sales.

dc337

Depends where you are.


Locally to me there is a store that only sells PC games, as well as PC games everywhere at retail game chains.

Avatar image for dc337
dc337

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 dc337
Member since 2008 • 2603 Posts

Its not any worse than last generation.

Especially with titles like Risen and ArmA II arriving of recent.

skrat_01

ARMA II while demanding is rather buggy and only looks good because of the high res textures. The character models aren't that great.

Risen is a multiplat and while decent doesn't have the best graphics.

Last gen I had a gaming pc and I sure don't remember waiting every quarter for a delayed ps2 port. I also remember games like Doom 3 being designed for the pc and only being ported to the xbox as an afterthought. The Doom 3 port was actually handled by a third party since iD at the time didn't want to mess with consoles. Remember Call of Duty? How about the Battlefield games that were designed for the pc? Remember how EA used to have sports games on the pc? So yes there has been some decline from last gen.