PC Gaming is not impressive.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

I built a computer, and I must say, PC Gaming is not impressive at all. What was all the hooplah about? Even the graphics (Crysis) which are so highly touted are hardly better than consoles.

Avatar image for ninjakamster1
ninjakamster1

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 ninjakamster1
Member since 2009 • 68 Posts

That's funny, because I've never found console gaming impressive, just passable, "meh".

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
It all depends on whether developers are doing something with the hardware that you value enough to pay the marginal cost (time/money/etc.). I actually like the direction console games are going (an unending stream of high-action FPS), so for me, it's not. If you're into niche genres, cell streaming in sandboxes bothers you, or you can't stand 720p, then I can see where it would be. So, no, PC gaming isn't impressive, but for me, nothing is really impressive at the moment. That could just be me getting old and cranky, though.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#4 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
If console gaming is so damn impressive, then why would you build a PC? What kind of games do you like?
Avatar image for 100000
100000

549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 100000
Member since 2003 • 549 Posts
I think one of the huge factors that makes PC graphics look better is resolution. Most console games run on 720p and scale up to 1080p. They do not run on 1080p natively. PC gaming supports insanely high resolutions that gives a much crisper view. You can only appreciate this with a big monitor. Furthermore Crysis (which still looks bloody fantastic in my opinion) is from 2007, it's already 3 years old. The mere fact that people still consider it graphics king after nearly 3 years is an amazing accomplishment for the game, but it's no surprise it's not the flagship it used to be.
Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

That's funny, because I've never found console gaming impressive, just passable, "meh".

ninjakamster1

You must not have a flat screen over 50" and Surround Sound capable of Lossless Audio.

Console Gaming is much better.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

You got to love fanboy logic.

If one version is running at 600p instead of 720p; then it is epic ownage. But if someone shows the game running at 1080p with 16x AF and 4x AA, plus any PC specific enhancements, then it's not impressive.

Oh and by the way, PC is too expensive but paying more for a PS3 instead of a Blu-ray player is justified; because "you get what you pay for".

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62015 Posts

"hardly better than consoles" lolwut?

Better is purely opinion. Just because you don't prefer it doesn't mean other people don't. I personally like PC gaming more, however I still enjoy playing the consoles.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

"hardly better than consoles" lolwut?

Better is purely opinion. Just because you don't prefer it doesn't mean other people don't. I personally like PC gaming more, however I still enjoy playing the consoles.

lundy86_4

I meant the graphics, which is borderline between opinion and truth.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

I dunno, maybe I needed to build a better computer to notice these graphical differences.

Avatar image for 100000
100000

549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 100000
Member since 2003 • 549 Posts
http://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/index.html -- that should help ;-) The differences are not extremely significant. I mean both console and PC versions look fantastic, but the PC version is definitely on top.
Avatar image for Mazoch
Mazoch

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 Mazoch
Member since 2004 • 2473 Posts

I built a computer, and I must say, PC Gaming is not impressive at all. What was all the hooplah about? Even the graphics (Crysis) which are so highly touted are hardly better than consoles.

GioVela2010

IMHO, the graphics are not miles beyond that of the consoles. They tend to be a little sharper compared to the consoles due to higher resolution and some of the games have some eye candy that the consoles don't have, but for the most part you'd have to know to look for them to see them in the first place.

So, yeah the PC has better graphics, but it's not by a vast amount. Does that make the PC unimpressive? That's ultimately a personal opinion. The main draw of the PC for me is no the graphics but the diversity of games. There are far more genres and game types, far more surprising and different titles.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62015 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

"hardly better than consoles" lolwut?

Better is purely opinion. Just because you don't prefer it doesn't mean other people don't. I personally like PC gaming more, however I still enjoy playing the consoles.

GioVela2010

I meant the graphics, which is borderline between opinion and truth.

I know you meant graphics. One set of systems runs games at 720p, or 1080p with less to render, whereas one system runs at upwards of 720p and can include 2560x1600 with AA and AF turned up. Graphics are clearly better, however that does not detract from what the consoles are capable of. Consoles can output excellent graphics, whereas PC can output phenominal graphics.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

You must not have a flat screen over 50" and Surround Sound capable of Lossless Audio.

GioVela2010

30", 40", 50", 60" etc. it's all the same.

You are still staring at a 1280x720 resolution image, bigger screens just mean you can sit back further. I wouldn't want to sit up to one close, widely spaced pixels and image stretching cannot be pretty.

I'd rather have a screen the correct size for the number of pixels on screen, you get much better image clarity.

Avatar image for menes777
menes777

2643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 menes777
Member since 2003 • 2643 Posts

I built a computer, and I must say, PC Gaming is not impressive at all. What was all the hooplah about? Even the graphics (Crysis) which are so highly touted are hardly better than consoles.

GioVela2010

LOL you do realize that you can change the settings right?? I imagine you didn't know how to and left everything at Medium on a DX9 card and wondered why it was just meh.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

[QUOTE="GioVela2010"]

You must not have a flat screen over 50" and Surround Sound capable of Lossless Audio.

AnnoyedDragon

30", 40", 50", 60" etc. it's all the same.

You are still staring at a 1280x720 resolution image, bigger screens just mean you can sit back further. I wouldn't want to sit up to one close, widely spaced pixels and image stretching cannot be pretty.

I'd rather have a screen the correct size for the number of pixels on screen, you get much better image clarity.

It's all relative, sitting 2 feet away from a 1680x1050 screen makes each pixel appear the same size as the pixels from a 60" screen sitting 9 feet away from a 1080p screen.

Avatar image for shadow_hosi
shadow_hosi

9543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#17 shadow_hosi
Member since 2006 • 9543 Posts

[QUOTE="GioVela2010"]

You must not have a flat screen over 50" and Surround Sound capable of Lossless Audio.

AnnoyedDragon

30", 40", 50", 60" etc. it's all the same.

You are still staring at a 1280x720 resolution image, bigger screens just mean you can sit back further. I wouldn't want to sit up to one close, widely spaced pixels and image stretching cannot be pretty.

I'd rather have a screen the correct size for the number of pixels on screen, you get much better image clarity.

clearly you have never played console games, because they self correct for big screen TVs and look flawless in all resolutions :lol:

dang, i was so close with predicting what TC would say :/

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62015 Posts

TC, not looking to bash, just interested, but what are the specs of your computer?

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts

What's with all the random PC hate lately. Since I've been on this board PC is almost never mentioned except in graphics, and now suddenly there have been 6-7 topics in the past few days about how pc gaming sucks, has no exclusives, is too difficult, costs too much. None of which are true... I mean was there some console fan convention recently that I missed where everyone decided to gang up on PC?

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

[QUOTE="GioVela2010"]

I built a computer, and I must say, PC Gaming is not impressive at all. What was all the hooplah about? Even the graphics (Crysis) which are so highly touted are hardly better than consoles.

menes777

LOL you do realize that you can change the settings right?? I imagine you didn't know how to and left everything at Medium on a DX9 card and wondered why it was just meh.

I have a DX9 card? Is that bad? I dunno, I just turned up all the settings as high as I could and everything was running pretty smooth.

Avatar image for sayonara89
sayonara89

1985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 sayonara89
Member since 2009 • 1985 Posts
I'm gonna play some Gothic 3 right now ;)
Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

TC, not looking to bash, just interested, but what are the specs of your computer?

lundy86_4

i7 930

6GB RAM

HD 5870

23" 1080p LED Monitor

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

It's all relative, sitting 2 feet away from a 1680x1050 screen makes each pixel appear the same size as the pixels from a 60" screen sitting 9 feet away from a 1080p screen.

GioVela2010

clearly you have never played console games, because they self correct for big screen TVs and look flawless in all resolutions :lol:

dang, i was so close with predicting what TC would say :/

shadow_hosi

Stick your face up to a large HDTV and then do the same with a monitor, the pixels on a TV are much more widely spaced than on a PC monitor.

If you buy a 1080p TV it doesn't matter if it is 30" or 60", it still has 1920x1080 pixels on screen, they are just spaced further apart. Televisions are designed to be viewed at a distance, get too close the image quality is terrible.

With consoles you have a 720p image regardless of the size of the TV screen, bigger screens means the image is stretched more.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62015 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

TC, not looking to bash, just interested, but what are the specs of your computer?

GioVela2010

i7 930

6GB RAM

HD 5870

23" 1080p LED Monitor

All in all a very solid and capable computer. You should look at picking up games like Metro 2033, Stalker: CoP and Bad Company 2 which all use DX11 nicely.

They all look fantastic too.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

[QUOTE="GioVela2010"]

It's all relative, sitting 2 feet away from a 1680x1050 screen makes each pixel appear the same size as the pixels from a 60" screen sitting 9 feet away from a 1080p screen.

AnnoyedDragon

clearly you have never played console games, because they self correct for big screen TVs and look flawless in all resolutions :lol:

dang, i was so close with predicting what TC would say :/

shadow_hosi

Stick your face up to a large HDTV and then do the same with a monitor, the pixels on a TV are much more widely spaced than on a PC monitor.

If you buy a 1080p TV it doesn't matter if it is 30" or 60", it still has 1920x1080 pixels on screen, they are just spaced further apart. Televisions are designed to be viewed at a distance, get too close the image quality is terrible.

With consoles you have a 720p image regardless of the size of the TV screen, bigger screens means the image is stretched more.

That's nice and all, but the differences just aren't noticable IRL

Avatar image for menes777
menes777

2643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 menes777
Member since 2003 • 2643 Posts

[QUOTE="menes777"]

[QUOTE="GioVela2010"]

I built a computer, and I must say, PC Gaming is not impressive at all. What was all the hooplah about? Even the graphics (Crysis) which are so highly touted are hardly better than consoles.

GioVela2010

LOL you do realize that you can change the settings right?? I imagine you didn't know how to and left everything at Medium on a DX9 card and wondered why it was just meh.

I have a DX9 card? Is that bad? I dunno, I just turned up all the settings as high as I could and everything was running pretty smooth.

DX9 isn't bad, but to see Crysis at it's best you really need a DX10 card (and have Vista or above to even get DX10).

Also if you did turn up all the settings to the highest possible you would have brought a DX9 card to it's knees. Your story is starting to not add up now.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts

[QUOTE="GioVela2010"]

[QUOTE="menes777"]

LOL you do realize that you can change the settings right?? I imagine you didn't know how to and left everything at Medium on a DX9 card and wondered why it was just meh.

menes777

I have a DX9 card? Is that bad? I dunno, I just turned up all the settings as high as I could and everything was running pretty smooth.

DX9 isn't bad, but to see Crysis at it's best you really need a DX10 card (and have Vista or above to even get DX10).

Also if you did turn up all the settings to the highest possible you would have brought a DX9 card to it's knees. Your story is starting to not add up now.

He supposedly bought a 5870 which makes no sense because why would you buy a 5870 unless you were sure you wanted to play pc games?

Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#28 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

I agree, PC gaming is not impressive...now, relax, let me explain why i think that.

Sure, the graphics are above everything else, and i say, that is quite impressive...then again when it comes to the actual game is not impressive, now, i'm not saying is a bad gaming device, because is not, i'm a huge RTS fan and i love StarCraft with passion, but my point is, that unlike what some Hermits try to "prove" the PC is not the almighty device with games so good and out of this wrorld that an ordinary human mind can't understand, i say PC gaming is as good as the Console gaming.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

So the 5870 is a DX9 card? Is the GTX 470 a DX10 card? and the GTX 480 a DX11 card?

Should I have bought the GTX 480 to truly see the difference between console and PC gaming?

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

That's nice and all, but the differences just aren't noticable IRL

GioVela2010

I disagree, significantly. You cannot stretch a image several times its original size and only get minor impact on image quality. Maybe if you are sat across the room you won't notice.

Either way it is just a difference in opinion, I just don't see how yours can be honest.

Avatar image for sayonara89
sayonara89

1985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 sayonara89
Member since 2009 • 1985 Posts

[QUOTE="GioVela2010"]

[QUOTE="menes777"]

LOL you do realize that you can change the settings right?? I imagine you didn't know how to and left everything at Medium on a DX9 card and wondered why it was just meh.

menes777

I have a DX9 card? Is that bad? I dunno, I just turned up all the settings as high as I could and everything was running pretty smooth.

DX9 isn't bad, but to see Crysis at it's best you really need a DX10 card (and have Vista or above to even get DX10).

Also if you did turn up all the settings to the highest possible you would have brought a DX9 card to it's knees. Your story is starting to not add up now.

Nope, you can see all "dx10" effects in dx9 mode on dx9 card (with super poor performance of course), all you need to do is to open notepad and change some cfg files ;)
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62015 Posts

I agree, PC gaming is not impressive...now, relax, let me explain why i think that.

Sure, the graphics are above everything else, and i say, that is quite impressive...then again when it comes to the actual game is not impressive, now, i'm not saying is a bad gaming device, because is not, i'm a huge RTS fan and i love StarCraft with passion, but my point is, that unlike what some Hermits try to "prove" the PC is not the almighty device with games so good and out of this wrorld that an ordinary human mind can't understand, i say PC gaming is as good as the Console gaming.

madsnakehhh

Pretty much. The whole thing is just opinionated at the end of the day. There are things PC does better than consoles, obviously. However if a person isn't looking for thos features, and the games don't appeal, obviously it's not the system for them.

Avatar image for Mazoch
Mazoch

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#33 Mazoch
Member since 2004 • 2473 Posts

So the 5870 is a DX9 card? Is the GTX 470 a DX10 card? and the GTX 480 a DX11 card?

Should I have bought the GTX 480 to truly see the difference between console and PC gaming?

GioVela2010
Nope, the 5870 is a DX11 card. Or in other words, you got one of the best cards on the market, it's a solid card for gaming :)
Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#34 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts
You need to play sins of a solar empire. Build a fleet of 2000 ships and attack an enemy fleet over a planet and tell me that is no impressive You also need to play stalker with complete mod and see the thunder during a night storm and tell me that is not impressive Also you need to drop a nuclear bomb in world in conflict and tell that is not impressive and of course crysis with CCC mod
Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts

[QUOTE="menes777"]

[QUOTE="GioVela2010"]

I have a DX9 card? Is that bad? I dunno, I just turned up all the settings as high as I could and everything was running pretty smooth.

sayonara89

DX9 isn't bad, but to see Crysis at it's best you really need a DX10 card (and have Vista or above to even get DX10).

Also if you did turn up all the settings to the highest possible you would have brought a DX9 card to it's knees. Your story is starting to not add up now.

Nope, you can see all "dx10" effects in dx9 mode on dx9 card (with super poor performance of course), all you need to do is to open notepad and change some cfg files ;)

considering that TC doesn't even know what DX9-10-11 is I'm going to assume that is beyond his skill level.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

[QUOTE="sayonara89"][QUOTE="menes777"]

DX9 isn't bad, but to see Crysis at it's best you really need a DX10 card (and have Vista or above to even get DX10).

Also if you did turn up all the settings to the highest possible you would have brought a DX9 card to it's knees. Your story is starting to not add up now.

Vaasman

Nope, you can see all "dx10" effects in dx9 mode on dx9 card (with super poor performance of course), all you need to do is to open notepad and change some cfg files ;)

considering that TC doesn't even know what DX9-10-11 is I'm going to assume that is beyond his skill level.

Well apparently I have a DX11 card, so i don't need to do all taht.

Avatar image for menes777
menes777

2643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 menes777
Member since 2003 • 2643 Posts

[QUOTE="menes777"]

[QUOTE="GioVela2010"]

I have a DX9 card? Is that bad? I dunno, I just turned up all the settings as high as I could and everything was running pretty smooth.

sayonara89

DX9 isn't bad, but to see Crysis at it's best you really need a DX10 card (and have Vista or above to even get DX10).

Also if you did turn up all the settings to the highest possible you would have brought a DX9 card to it's knees. Your story is starting to not add up now.

Nope, you can see all "dx10" effects in dx9 mode on dx9 card (with super poor performance of course), all you need to do is to open notepad and change some cfg files ;)

Have you tried that personally? I read something similar to that, but also read that the person who wrote it was full of $hit. That in practice it was still doing DX9.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="ninjakamster1"]

That's funny, because I've never found console gaming impressive, just passable, "meh".

GioVela2010

You must not have a flat screen over 50" and Surround Sound capable of Lossless Audio.

Console Gaming is much better.

I do, and it's not very impressive when you can do the same with or better with a PC. What really turns me off about console is the lack of native 1080 resolution and imagine filtering, the sound is great, but between lossless audio and compressed, some games you just can't tell... unless you have a crappy PC sounds system.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]

[QUOTE="sayonara89"] Nope, you can see all "dx10" effects in dx9 mode on dx9 card (with super poor performance of course), all you need to do is to open notepad and change some cfg files ;)GioVela2010

considering that TC doesn't even know what DX9-10-11 is I'm going to assume that is beyond his skill level.

Well apparently I have a DX11 card, so i don't need to do all taht.

So just curious here, but why would you buy a gaming PC if you don't like PC gaming? How does that make any sense? A 5870? Really? who buys a 5870 just so they can play games they apparently don't find impressive.

Avatar image for metalisticpain
metalisticpain

3536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#40 metalisticpain
Member since 2005 • 3536 Posts

[QUOTE="ninjakamster1"]

That's funny, because I've never found console gaming impressive, just passable, "meh".

GioVela2010

You must not have a flat screen over 50" and Surround Sound capable of Lossless Audio.

Console Gaming is much better.

LOL, what is point of a sound system capable of running LOSSLESS audio when you are playing compressed sound files on a disc... trust me the audio on game discs is not lossless...
Avatar image for RichardStallman
RichardStallman

1233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 RichardStallman
Member since 2009 • 1233 Posts
Babie's first troll. *yawn*
Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts

I'm calling shenanigans, this is yet another failed attempt to bash pc gaming.

Avatar image for AFBrat77
AFBrat77

26848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#43 AFBrat77
Member since 2004 • 26848 Posts

[QUOTE="ninjakamster1"]

That's funny, because I've never found console gaming impressive, just passable, "meh".

GioVela2010

You must not have a flat screen over 50" and Surround Sound capable of Lossless Audio.

Console Gaming is much better.

not by a longshot.......the PC games library is far superior, especially those PC games made from 1997 - 2000, games that were made for PC first, and not dumbed-down for lesser consoles.

Then again, i guess those games won't satisfy a graphics-nut.

Avatar image for windsquid9000
windsquid9000

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 windsquid9000
Member since 2009 • 3206 Posts

Pics or it didn't happen.

Avatar image for -HalleR-
-HalleR-

612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 -HalleR-
Member since 2008 • 612 Posts

[QUOTE="ninjakamster1"]

That's funny, because I've never found console gaming impressive, just passable, "meh".

GioVela2010

You must not have a flat screen over 50" and Surround Sound capable of Lossless Audio.

Console Gaming is much better.

And, you can use all that fancy stuff for you PC to.
Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#47 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

not by a longshot.......the PC games library is far superior, especially those PC games made from 1997 - 2000, games that were made for PC first, and not dumbed-down for lesser consoles.

Then again, i guess those games won't satisfy a graphics-nut.

AFBrat77

Why it was superior?

Because in my humble opinion, no PC game from that time can surpass my dear old OoT, not even StarCraft or Half Life.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

Pics or it didn't happen.

windsquid9000












Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

I knew he made a topic just to show off... I he was waiting for someone to ask him, he does this in every topic...

But hopefully you have a good headset...

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#50 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts

[QUOTE="windsquid9000"]

Pics or it didn't happen.

GioVela2010

lol not even one timestamp? Gonna have to do better than that.