Bah, your opinion is biased against Sony/Microsoft/Nintendo. :P[QUOTE="789shadow"]
The only person who's opinion is fact is mine.:P
Aljosa23
My opinion rules all lololololol
I'm also biased against Sega!!!:P
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Sure you're not. I already know your views on FF, don't even try that...:roll:The fact that you think every review is biased and compares to FF is pure speculation. Or maybe reviewers just love FF more than other jRPGs, and I see. But than again...lets get out the tin hates shall we?Aljosa23But it is true. Think back to some of your favorite JRPGs of all time, and think about how much fun you had with them in comparison to Final Fantasy. Some of the greatest JRPGs of all time have been given 6s and 7s because of an unfair environment created since the inception of Final Fantasy. Games which break the mold are being called generic, and scoring downard (suikoden) while the most generic JRPG of all time; Final Fantasy, gets AAA games. I don't think anyone can deny that the JRPG industry is unfairly geared towards Final Fantasy fans.
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]Sure you're not. I already know your views on FF, don't even try that...:roll:The fact that you think every review is biased and compares to FF is pure speculation. Or maybe reviewers just love FF more than other jRPGs, and I see. But than again...lets get out the tin hates shall we?VandalvideoBut it is true. Think back to some of your favorite JRPGs of all time, and think about how much fun you had with them in comparison to Final Fantasy. Some of the greatest JRPGs of all time have been given 6s and 7s because of an unfair environment created since the inception of Final Fantasy. Games which break the mold are being called generic, and scoring downard (suikoden) while the most generic JRPG of all time; Final Fantasy, gets AAA games. I don't think anyone can deny that the JRPG industry is unfairly geared towards Final Fantasy fans.
There goes my-opinion-is-fact again.:roll:
There goes my-opinion-is-fact again.:roll:789shadowI'm not entirely sure what part of that post was opinion. When comparing the leaps and strides Final fantasy has made with the advances in other games, one clearly sees that it is one of the more generic JRPGs out there. That isn't necessarily bad, but at the same time some of the other great JRPGs like Suikoden are being downranking for being 'generic'. It is a double standard. The JRPG reviewers aren't all that great.
But it is true. Think back to some of your favorite JRPGs of all time, and think about how much fun you had with them in comparison to Final Fantasy. Some of the greatest JRPGs of all time have been given 6s and 7s because of an unfair environment created since the inception of Final Fantasy. Games which break the mold are being called generic, and scoring downard (suikoden) while the most generic JRPG of all time; Final Fantasy, gets AAA games. I don't think anyone can deny that the JRPG industry is unfairly geared towards Final Fantasy fans. VandalvideoFair enough. FF set a standard in JRPGs and you can't deny that. The fact that every JRPG gets compared to it must mean the games are great and deserve their praise. You can have an opinion sure, but don't start these conspiracy theories. Maybe the reviewers didn't like those games, and thus rated them accordingly.
And who are you to call FF "generic"? For god's sakes you thought Star Ocean: TLH was better than Tales of Vesperia. :|
[QUOTE="789shadow"]There goes my-opinion-is-fact again.:roll:VandalvideoI'm not entirely sure what part of that post was opinion. When comparing the leaps and strides Final fantasy has made with the advances in other games, one clearly sees that it is one of the more generic JRPGs out there. That isn't necessarily bad, but at the same time some of the other great JRPGs like Suikoden are being downranking for being 'generic'. It is a double standard. The JRPG reviewers aren't all that great.
Um, every part of that post was opinion.:|
]Fair enough. FF set a standard in JRPGs and you can't deny that. The fact that every JRPG gets compared to it must mean the games are great and deserve their praise. You can have an opinion sure, but don't start these conspiracy theories. Maybe the reviewers didn't like those games, and thus rated them accordingly.And who are you to call FF "generic"? For god's sakes you thought Star Ocean: TLH was better than Tales of Vesperia. :|Aljosa23I agree with your first line; Final Fantasy set a standard. It set a double standard. It is one of the few JRPGs that have been receiving high rankings across its life span. It only very recently, with Final Fantasy 10, started to begin the process of revamping its gameplay. Prior to that, in the playstation era, the games were largely generic. At the same time, games which aren't generic by any stretch of the imagination were getting 6s and 7s. Then Suikoden 3 came along, kowtowed to Final Fantasy pressure, and scorred AAA. IT removed the originality that made Suikoden great in the first place and became a poor Final Fantasy copy. Final Fantasy isn't soo god that it makes some of the best JRPGs of all time A in comparison.
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]]Fair enough. FF set a standard in JRPGs and you can't deny that. The fact that every JRPG gets compared to it must mean the games are great and deserve their praise. You can have an opinion sure, but don't start these conspiracy theories. Maybe the reviewers didn't like those games, and thus rated them accordingly.And who are you to call FF "generic"? For god's sakes you thought Star Ocean: TLH was better than Tales of Vesperia. :|VandalvideoI agree with your first line; Final Fantasy set a standard. It set a double standard. It is one of the few JRPGs that have been receiving high rankings across its life span. It only very recently, with Final Fantasy 10, started to begin the process of revamping its gameplay. Prior to that, in the playstation era, the games were largely generic. At the same time, games which aren't generic by any stretch of the imagination were getting 6s and 7s. Then Suikoden 3 came along, kowtowed to Final Fantasy pressure, and scorred AAA. IT removed the originality that made Suikoden great in the first place and became a poor Final Fantasy copy. Final Fantasy isn't soo god that it makes some of the best JRPGs of all time A in comparison.
So a game series that sets pretty much the ground rules for a genre is setting a double standard?
Um, every part of that post was opinion.:|789shadowBy mere virtue of its delineating gameplay, it was generic up until the end of FF10.
So a game series that sets pretty much the ground rules for a genre is setting a double standard?789shadowFinal Fantasy didn't set the ground rules. Final Fantasy wasn't the first JRPG. Final Fantasy was merely the most popular. Holding the other types of JRPGs; innumerable as they are, up to Final Fantasy's conventiona lstandards and calling them generic is unfair.
[QUOTE="789shadow"]So a game series that sets pretty much the ground rules for a genre is setting a double standard?VandalvideoFinal Fantasy didn't set the ground rules. Final Fantasy wasn't the first JRPG. Final Fantasy was merely the most popular. Holding the other types of JRPGs; innumerable as they are, up to Final Fantasy's conventiona lstandards and calling them generic is unfair.
And since FF was the most popular RPG, it became the standard because people set it up as what RPG's should be.
I agree with your first line; Final Fantasy set a standard. It set a double standard. It is one of the few JRPGs that have been receiving high rankings across its life span. It only very recently, with Final Fantasy 10, started to begin the process of revamping its gameplay. Prior to that, in the playstation era, the games were largely generic. At the same time, games which aren't generic by any stretch of the imagination were getting 6s and 7s. Then Suikoden 3 came along, kowtowed to Final Fantasy pressure, and scorred AAA. IT removed the originality that made Suikoden great in the first place and became a poor Final Fantasy copy. Final Fantasy isn't soo god that it makes some of the best JRPGs of all time A in comparison.VandalvideoThe only game I see that fits your "mold" is Legend of Dragoon and the Suikoden games deserved more, I agree.
BUT, the FF games aren't generic in anyway at all, though you can make a case for VII. It's almost as if you hate the series because it overshadowed the lesser JRPGs out there, and that bias doesn't bode well with your argument.
Opinion again. Prove it had delineating gameplay through facts.789shadowDelineating gameplay means drived through its predecessors. Whatever Final Fantasy game you're playing, there are a few trends which have been passed down through the games. Yes, they are turnbased, but they are much more than that. Character evolution based on item wearing, ambient levels through SP and other properties, and the different types of summons are all the factors which have landmarked Final Fantasy. There isn't anything in Final Fantasy, up until recently, that really sets itself apart from other games.
[QUOTE="IronBass"]Nope. DS owns all in 2009. Hell yeah 8) Don't like it? Get a DS. Hell yeah 8)scoobiesnackarfThe DS wishes it was a PC. PC has real manly and hardcore games, DS has cooking mama!The PC is my favourite platform by far but must you bash every other platform. You're making Hermits look like Elitists to the maximum. :|
[QUOTE="789shadow"]Opinion again. Prove it had delineating gameplay through facts.VandalvideoDelineating gameplay means drived through its predecessors. Whatever Final Fantasy game you're playing, there are a few trends which have been passed down through the games. Yes, they are turnbased, but they are much more than that. Character evolution based on item wearing, ambient levels through SP and other properties, and the different types of summons are all the factors which have landmarked Final Fantasy. There isn't anything in Final Fantasy, up until recently, that really sets itself apart from other games.
You do realize the only way to prove something is through numbers, right? You have failed again.
The DS wishes it was a PC. PC has real manly and hardcore games, DS has cooking mama!The PC is my favourite platform by far but must you bash every other platform. You're making Hermits look like Elitists to the maximum. :| I must defend the PC! Gamespot is trying to bring it down and all of us down! We must defend her to the core![QUOTE="scoobiesnackarf"][QUOTE="IronBass"]Nope. DS owns all in 2009. Hell yeah 8) Don't like it? Get a DS. Hell yeah 8)Aljosa23
The only game I see that fits your "mold" is Legend of Dragoon and the Suikoden games deserved more, I agree.BUT, the FF games aren't generic in anyway at all, though you can make a case for VII. It's almost as if you hate the series because it overshadowed the lesser JRPGs out there, and that bias doesn't bode well with your argument.Aljosa23Final Fantasy 1 through FInal Fantasy 9 all follow the basic layout of gameplay, with different names for the standard conventions of the games themselves. Whether you're dealing with materia, item inhancements, or other properties, Final Fantasy gameplay is pretty standard. If you played seven, you know what to expect from nine, eight, and six and so forth. Final Fantasy 10, 12, and 13 are beginning to change that, and it is a good change of pace. But prior to these gameplay changes FInal Fantasy has largely been the same game for quite some time with minoir changes. Final Fantasy made other games score lower, there are dozens of games which should have scored higher.
I must defend the PC! Gamespot is trying to bring it down and all of us down! We must defend her to the core!scoobiesnackarfDefending and bashing are two totally different things.
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]The only game I see that fits your "mold" is Legend of Dragoon and the Suikoden games deserved more, I agree.BUT, the FF games aren't generic in anyway at all, though you can make a case for VII. It's almost as if you hate the series because it overshadowed the lesser JRPGs out there, and that bias doesn't bode well with your argument.VandalvideoFinal Fantasy 1 through FInal Fantasy 9 all follow the basic layout of gameplay, with different names for the standard conventions of the games themselves. Whether you're dealing with materia, item inhancements, or other properties, Final Fantasy gameplay is pretty standard. If you played seven, you know what to expect from nine, eight, and six and so forth. Final Fantasy 10, 12, and 13 are beginning to change that, and it is a good change of pace. But prior to these gameplay changes FInal Fantasy has largely been the same game for quite some time with minoir changes. Final Fantasy made other games score lower, there are dozens of games which should have scored higher.
According to you.
You do realize the only way to prove something is through numbers, right? You have failed again.789shadowYou don't have to use numbers. This is the problem of identity. They all share these traits which delineated throughout the games. Therefore, they are derivative.
Defending and bashing are two totally different things. Judgment today is coming for the PC! Skynet will try to take it over with the console machines. We must be the resistance and I will be John Connor. Follow me to VICTORY![QUOTE="scoobiesnackarf"] I must defend the PC! Gamespot is trying to bring it down and all of us down! We must defend her to the core!Aljosa23
Final Fantasy 1 through FInal Fantasy 9 all follow the basic layout of gameplay, with different names for the standard conventions of the games themselves. Whether you're dealing with materia, item inhancements, or other properties, Final Fantasy gameplay is pretty standard. If you played seven, you know what to expect from nine, eight, and six and so forth. Final Fantasy 10, 12, and 13 are beginning to change that, and it is a good change of pace. But prior to these gameplay changes FInal Fantasy has largely been the same game for quite some time with minoir changes. Final Fantasy made other games score lower, there are dozens of games which should have scored higher. VandalvideoI fail to see how that makes the games "Generic".
A generic game is something that steals from other games and being derivative to the point of blatant copy. How can FF steal from itself considering it gave birth to almost all great gameplay styles in jRPGs.
I also fail to see how FF made those other games score less. That must mean they didn't live up to the FF standard. Or are we going to back that "Everything not FF is underrated" conspiracy again?
[QUOTE="789shadow"]You do realize the only way to prove something is through numbers, right? You have failed again.VandalvideoYou don't have to use numbers. This is the problem of identity. They all share these traits which delineated throughout the games. Therefore, they are derivative.
Numbers are the only truly un-subjective things out there. For every person who agrees with you, someone else will disagree. Therefore, nothing you say is fact.
I fail to see how that makes the games "Generic".A generic game is something that steals from other games and being derivative to the point of blatant copy. How can FF steal from itself considering it gave birth to almost all great gameplay styles in jRPGs.I also fail to see how FF made those other games score less. That must mean they didn't live up to the FF standard. Or are we going to back that "Everything not FF is underrated" conspiracy again?Aljosa23It is generic because the gameplay is derivative from Final Fantasy 1 through 9. The gameplay, as I highlighted rarely changed, and if it did it was miniscule at best. Final Fantasy, as being derivative, is fairly generic. It didn't change up the pace, and was largely unoriginal. Despite this, the game continually scored high. At the same time, other games were being scored low for being generic, when in all actuallity they were switching up gameplay far more often than Final Fantasy was. Final Fantasy did not give birth to all great game styles in JRPGs. Action and strategy JRPGs were already out prior to Final Fantasy 13 and Final Fantasy Tactics. Final Fantasy isn't some god among JRPGs above all the other games. Vandal Hearts is arguably better than Tactics.
Numbers are the only truly un-subjective things out there. For every person who agrees with you, someone else will disagree. Therefore, nothing you say is fact.789shadowThat isn't true. I'm using Leibniz's Law here. This is a highly ordered logical system. All the final fantasy games share traits which delineated from the first to the ninth. The games were derivative. The games were unoriginal.
It is generic because the gameplay is derivative from Final Fantasy 1 through 9.VandalvideoThat's maybe because... they are all part of the same series?
You don't have to use numbers. This is the problem of identity. They all share these traits which delineated throughout the games. Therefore, they are derivative.[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="789shadow"]You do realize the only way to prove something is through numbers, right? You have failed again.789shadow
Numbers are the only truly un-subjective things out there. For every person who agrees with you, someone else will disagree. Therefore, nothing you say is fact.
So everyone agrees that Tony Hawk 3 is a 10/10. Yes you are correct.....[QUOTE="789shadow"]Numbers are the only truly un-subjective things out there. For every person who agrees with you, someone else will disagree. Therefore, nothing you say is fact.VandalvideoThat isn't true. I'm using Leibniz's Law here. This is a highly ordered logical system. All the final fantasy games share traits which delineated from the first to the ninth. The games were derivative. The games were unoriginal.
A game is unoriginal if it takes everything from other games outside of it's series. If FF got all of it's ideas from it's own series, that's not being generic. Thats being part of a series.
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] It is generic because the gameplay is derivative from Final Fantasy 1 through 9.IronBassThat's maybe because... they are all part of the same series?It goes to show that the gameplay rarely changed up leading up to Final Fantasy 10, and it wasn't any more original than other games which were being scored low for being 'unoriginal'.
It is generic because the gameplay is derivative from Final Fantasy 1 through 9. The gameplay, as I highlighted rarely changed, and if it did it was miniscule at best. Final Fantasy, as being derivative, is fairly generic. It didn't change up the pace, and was largely unoriginal. Despite this, the game continually scored high. At the same time, other games were being scored low for being generic, when in all actuallity they were switching up gameplay far more often than Final Fantasy was. Final Fantasy did not give birth to all great game styles in JRPGs. Action and strategy JRPGs were already out prior to Final Fantasy 13 and Final Fantasy Tactics. Final Fantasy isn't some god among JRPGs above all the other games. Vandal Hearts is arguably better than Tactics. VandalvideoOh I never said it was some God of Gaming or whatever, I was only arguing these ridiculous "facts" that you are claiming. I enjoy quite a large number of jRPGs also, and can name quite a few that rank up with the best FF. And notice I said ALMOST all gameplay styles was copied from FF.
The games are not derivative, they always have a gameplay element that makes them quite different from the last game, and they have different stories, characters, graphics, the list goes on and on.
A game is unoriginal if it takes everything from other games outside of it's series. If FF got all of it's ideas from it's own series, that's not being generic. Thats being part of a series.789shadowNo, a game is unoriginal if it doesn't bring anything original to the table. The Final Fantasies through the years rarely brought anything new to the table until Final Fantasy 10. It is unfair to have other JRPGs being scored down for being 'unoriginla' when they were breaking more ground than Final Fantasy.
[QUOTE="789shadow"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] You don't have to use numbers. This is the problem of identity. They all share these traits which delineated throughout the games. Therefore, they are derivative.out0v0rder
Numbers are the only truly un-subjective things out there. For every person who agrees with you, someone else will disagree. Therefore, nothing you say is fact.
So everyone agrees that Tony Hawk 3 is a 10/10. Yes you are correct.....That is not a number, as you know full well. That score is a numeric representation of an opinion. If the sales numbers for Tony Hawk 3 are released, that's fact.
No, they don't really destroy anything on the console, because most console gamers could care less about those games. Only game I care about on that list is Starcraft 2. You forgot Dragon Age as well, which I might actually get for my PC. There's nothing really to prove. All those games will get pirated just like PC games before it. At least 1/2 those games will probably end up on game console anyways.Since the first one was locked due to lack of content, here you go:
1. Empire Total War
2. Dawn of War 2
3. Men of War
4. Starcraft 2- (atleast one part should be released)
5. Sims 3
6. Anno 1404
7. Demigod
8. Zeno Clash
These alone destroy everything on consoles. PC- System of every year! I dare you to prove me wrong.
scoobiesnackarf
[QUOTE="789shadow"]Numbers are the only truly un-subjective things out there. For every person who agrees with you, someone else will disagree. Therefore, nothing you say is fact.VandalvideoThat isn't true. I'm using Leibniz's Law here. This is a highly ordered logical system. All the final fantasy games share traits which delineated from the first to the ninth. The games were derivative. The games were unoriginal. i don't know why, but someone trying to apply liebniz's law, a metaphysical tool, in gaming - depresses the hell out of me and makes me lose a bit of faith in humanity. that is all.
and it wasn't any more original than other games which were being scored low for being 'unoriginal'.VandalvideoAnd that's when subjectivity plays its role...
[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] It is generic because the gameplay is derivative from Final Fantasy 1 through 9.VandalvideoThat's maybe because... they are all part of the same series?It goes to show that the gameplay rarely changed up leading up to Final Fantasy 10, and it wasn't any more original than other games which were being scored low for being 'unoriginal'.
Because they were copying FF. Why must everything be different in different games in a series?:roll:
Oh I never said it was some God of Gaming or whatever, I was only arguing these ridiculous "facts" that you are claiming. I enjoy quite a large number of jRPGs also, and can name quite a few that rank up with the best FF. And notice I said ALMOST all gameplay styles was copied from FF.The games are not derivative, they always have a gameplay element that makes them quite different from the last game, and they have different stories, characters, graphics, the list goes on and on.Aljosa23Most gameplay styles isn't even right. About the only one that you can really say belongs to FInal Fantasy............none do. Turn based JRPGs were around prior to FInal Fantasy. The formula had already been cast in the mold. Final Fantasy was merely made popular. Being popular doesn't make you original by any stretch of the imagination. The games are derivative because they keep following the same gameplay form the originals. Stories, characters and graphics are not gameplay. Even then, FF6 and 7 are pretty dang close in all those regards.
It's so ironic how Vandal is talking about Generic jRPGs when he LOVES the Survival Horror genre. :roll:
There's your double standard.
Because they were copying FF. Why must everything be different in different games in a series?:roll:789shadowThey weren't copying FInal Fantasy . Most of the other JRPGs out there like Wild ARms, SUikoden, Shadow Hearts, Valkyrie Profile, and Star Ocean have gameplay far different from anything remotely similar to FInal Fantasy. Final Fantasy never reacted to change in the market. THey just kept on with the same formula they have been using since the beginning.
[QUOTE="789shadow"]Because they were copying FF. Why must everything be different in different games in a series?:roll:VandalvideoThey weren't copying FInal Fantasy . Most of the other JRPGs out there like Wild ARms, SUikoden, Shadow Hearts, Valkyrie Profile, and Star Ocean have gameplay far different from anything remotely similar to FInal Fantasy. Final Fantasy never reacted to change in the market. THey just kept on with the same formula they have been using since the beginning.
Well, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
[QUOTE="IronBass"] And that's when subjectivity plays its role...VandalvideoOriginal is bringing something new. How can you be original without bringing something new? How can you downrank a game for being unorigina lwhen it brings more things new to the table than Final Fantasy? In a lot of ways. A lot.
I never said I don't like Final Fantasy, I merely said that it is being graded unfairly in respect to other JRPGs.It's so ironic how Vandal is talking about Generic jRPGs when he LOVES the Survival Horror genre. :roll:
There's your double standard.
Aljosa23
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment