PC Owns all in 2009: Part 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#251 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

Most gameplay styles isn't even right. About the only one that you can really say belongs to FInal Fantasy............none do. Turn based JRPGs were around prior to FInal Fantasy. The formula had already been cast in the mold. Final Fantasy was merely made popular. Being popular doesn't make you original by any stretch of the imagination. The games are derivative because they keep following the same gameplay form the originals. Stories, characters and graphics are not gameplay. Even then, FF6 and 7 are pretty dang close in all those regards.Vandalvideo
Wait...so you think I play jRPGs for the gameplay? :|

:lol:

I never said anything about popularity. FF was released in 1987, what jRPG came before other than the Ys games?

Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#252 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

[QUOTE="IronBass"] And that's when subjectivity plays its role...Vandalvideo
Original is bringing something new. How can you be original without bringing something new? How can you downrank a game for being unorigina lwhen it brings more things new to the table than Final Fantasy?

Some people think SMG brought something new, some people didn't. Even originality is subjective.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#253 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Well, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.789shadow
Then don't claim it is somehow more original than the games that are bringing more things to the table. (Reviewers) Thats fine if you like how FInal Fantasy has been over the ages, but that doesn't change the fact that other games were being downranked for the same reason, despite being far more original.
Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#254 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

There is not one Final Fantasy game that can't be beat by a PC game. Fact!scoobiesnackarf

Vapid comment confirmed.:roll::P

Avatar image for -Traveller-
-Traveller-

2477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#255 -Traveller-
Member since 2009 • 2477 Posts

There is not one Final Fantasy game that can't be beat by a PC game. Fact!scoobiesnackarf

huh?

Ok, for example?

Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#256 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

[QUOTE="789shadow"]Well, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.Vandalvideo
Then don't claim it is somehow more original than the games that are bringing more things to the table. (Reviewers) Thats fine if you like how FInal Fantasy has been over the ages, but that doesn't change the fact that other games were being downranked for the same reason, despite being far more original.

This is getting ridiculous. For everyone who thinks that those RPGs were more original than FF, there will be people who disagree. You've been trying to prove opinions with more opinions.

Avatar image for The_AI
The_AI

4791

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#257 The_AI
Member since 2006 • 4791 Posts

I'm into RPGs, and I don't see Final Fantasy XIII or White Knight Chronicles on the PC, so no thanks.

vidplayer8

I'm going to get flamed for this. I just know it. Anybody have a spare flame shield? :(

I like Final Fantasy as much as the next guy, and Chrono Trigger is probably in my top 10 favoritegames EVER. However, I don't consider most JRPGs to be true RPGs. Well, the earlyFF gamesare, but they started to stray from that path at FFIV and then just totally forgot the path existed and created their own formula. Yes, the characters have stats and items, but you are given almost NO control over character growth. Also, you can't impact the story or the world around you at all (except in Chrono Trigger, the mother of all exceptions), there's very limited character interaction, and you are pretty much forced down a set path. That is why I tend to prefer WRPGs, since they're less linear, more interactive, and have tons more character customization.

This is why I like the PC. Yeah, the PS3 gets Dragon Age too, but knowing Bioware, the PC will most likely get the better version. ;)As for Alpha Protocol... I'm not sure. It will probably be equally good (or bad, since we have little information on it) over all platforms.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#258 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
]Wait...so you think I play jRPGs for the gameplay? :|I never said anything about popularity. FF was released in 1987, what jRPG came before other than the Ys games?Aljosa23
We're talking about gameplay though, which is primarily why these games have been getting downranked, when Final Fantasy isn't all that much better off. JRPGs have been around for a long time, and Final Fantasy was most certainly not the first.
Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#259 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]]Wait...so you think I play jRPGs for the gameplay? :|I never said anything about popularity. FF was released in 1987, what jRPG came before other than the Ys games?Vandalvideo
We're talking about gameplay though, which is primarily why these games have been getting downranked, when Final Fantasy isn't all that much better off. JRPGs have been around for a long time, and Final Fantasy was most certainly not the first.

Once again, opinion.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#260 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
This is getting ridiculous. For everyone who thinks that those RPGs were more original than FF, there will be people who disagree. You've been trying to prove opinions with more opinions.789shadow
They brought more new stuff. They were more original. That is factual.
Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#261 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

[QUOTE="789shadow"]This is getting ridiculous. For everyone who thinks that those RPGs were more original than FF, there will be people who disagree. You've been trying to prove opinions with more opinions.Vandalvideo
They brought more new stuff. They were more original. That is factual.

No, it isn't.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#262 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Once again, opinion.789shadow
No, these are using the standards that were unduly placed on other JRPG franchises. Using the standards that scored other games so low, they would be higher than Final Fantasy.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#263 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
No, it isn't.789shadow
Yes, it is. Since being original involves the bringing of new stuff, and they brought more new stuff, by virtue of linguistics they are more original.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#264 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

[QUOTE="789shadow"]Once again, opinion.Vandalvideo
No, these are using the standards that were unduly placed on other JRPG franchises. Using the standards that scored other games so low, they would be higher than Final Fantasy.

In your opinion.

Oh my god, see how that works? :shock:

Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#265 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

[QUOTE="789shadow"]Once again, opinion.Vandalvideo
No, these are using the standards that were unduly placed on other JRPG franchises. Using the standards that scored other games so low, they would be higher than Final Fantasy.

I'm just going to keep saying opinion, because that's all that anything anyone says comes down to. You have not dropped one fact. Not one.

Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#266 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

[QUOTE="789shadow"]No, it isn't.Vandalvideo
Yes, it is. Since being original involves the bringing of new stuff, and they brought more new stuff, by virtue of linguistics they are more original.

I can go out and find a person who disagrees, making it opinion.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#267 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
They brought more new stuff. They were more original. That is factual.Vandalvideo
Not really. You can always find a (or movie, book, story, etc) that did x-thing before one way or another. And even after that, you can argue how relevant that is in the first place. It's true, you've been trying to prove opinions with more opinions.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#268 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
I'm just going to keep saying opinion, because that's all that anything anyone says comes down to. You have not dropped one fact. Not one.789shadow
You can ignore it all you want, but this is fact. I'm using the EXACT standards that were placed on other games scoring lower, which were more original, so by virtue they should have scored more.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#269 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
I can go out and find a person who disagrees, making it opinion.789shadow
Just because someone disagrees doesn't mean it isn't a fact. There are plenty of scientific, established facts and other facts that people disagree with out of ignorance. Mere ignorance of fact does not mean that it is an opinion.
Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#270 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

[QUOTE="789shadow"]I can go out and find a person who disagrees, making it opinion.Vandalvideo
Just because someone disagrees doesn't mean it isn't a fact. There are plenty of scientific, established facts and other facts that people disagree with out of ignorance. Mere ignorance of fact does not mean that it is an opinion.

But we're talking about games, not gravity.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#271 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="IronBass"] Not really. You can always find a (or movie, book, story, etc) that did x-thing before one way or another. And even after that, you can argue how relevant that is in the first place. It's true, you've been trying to prove opinions with more opinions.

Yes really. If they bring more NEW stuff, they are more original. Alot of the games which have scored lower than Final Fantasy; Shadow Hearts, Suikoden, Wild Arms, Valkyrie Profile and others were using gameplay never seen before. It was original.
Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#272 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

[QUOTE="789shadow"]I'm just going to keep saying opinion, because that's all that anything anyone says comes down to. You have not dropped one fact. Not one.Vandalvideo
You can ignore it all you want, but this is fact. I'm using the EXACT standards that were placed on other games scoring lower, which were more original, so by virtue they should have scored more.

More original according to you.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#273 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

This discussion is getting nowhere...

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#274 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
But we're talking about games, not gravity789shadow
Doesn't matter. Just because someone disagrees with something doesn't mean it isn't a fact. It can still be a fact, the other person is just ignorant of the rammifications of their view.
Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#275 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

[QUOTE="IronBass"] Not really. You can always find a (or movie, book, story, etc) that did x-thing before one way or another. And even after that, you can argue how relevant that is in the first place. It's true, you've been trying to prove opinions with more opinions.Vandalvideo
Yes really. If they bring more NEW stuff, they are more original. Alot of the games which have scored lower than Final Fantasy; Shadow Hearts, Suikoden, Wild Arms, Valkyrie Profile and others were using gameplay never seen before. It was original.

Then perhaps that new gameplay wasn't as good as FF's, hmm?

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#276 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
More original according to you.789shadow
According to the english language. If it brought more new stuff; as the peremptory of originality, it is more original.
Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#277 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

This discussion is getting nowhere...

Aljosa23

I agree. Bottom line: everything related to games is subject to opinion. Except sales numbers. Now I have better things to do.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#278 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
Yes really. If they bring more NEW stuff, they are more original. Alot of the games which have scored lower than Final Fantasy; Shadow Hearts, Suikoden, Wild Arms, Valkyrie Profile and others were using gameplay never seen before. It was original.Vandalvideo
Nope. It may be new for you , but there's no way to prove as a fact that they did. You are giving your view about the matter, nothing more. Not facts.
Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#279 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

[QUOTE="789shadow"]More original according to you.Vandalvideo
According to the english language. If it brought more new stuff; as the peremptory of originality, it is more original.

It's your opinion that it's new, and if it is, new doesn't equal good.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#280 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Then perhaps that new gameplay wasn't as good as FF's, hmm?789shadow
Which may or may not be. But the reviews themselves largely quote originality as the guiding factor, somethign which Final Fantasy doesn't have a lot of over theyears.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#281 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
It's your opinion that it's new, and if it is, new doesn't equal good.789shadow
But 'new' was the standard that was used against other games, which ought to have been used against Final Fantasy too.
Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#282 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

[QUOTE="789shadow"]Then perhaps that new gameplay wasn't as good as FF's, hmm?Vandalvideo
Which may or may not be. But the reviews themselves largely quote originality as the guiding factor, somethign which Final Fantasy doesn't have a lot of over theyears.

*groan* I really don't want to have this discussion anymore....

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#283 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="IronBass"] Nope. It may be new for you , but there's no way to prove as a fact that they did. You are giving your view about the matter, nothing more. Not facts.

Yes, facts. There weren't any games prior to these games that instituted the gameplay designs that they used. In contrast, FInal Fantasy kept using the same old thing from the previous games. These games brought more new things to the table.
Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#284 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

[QUOTE="IronBass"] Nope. It may be new for you , but there's no way to prove as a fact that they did. You are giving your view about the matter, nothing more. Not facts.Vandalvideo
Yes, facts. There weren't any games prior to these games that instituted the gameplay designs that they used. In contrast, FInal Fantasy kept using the same old thing from the previous games. These games brought more new things to the table.

And they failed to execute those new designs as well as FF executed it's "generic" design.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#285 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
Yes, facts. There weren't any games prior to these games that instituted the gameplay designs that they used. In contrast, FInal Fantasy kept using the same old thing from the previous games. These games brought more new things to the table.Vandalvideo
Sometimes arguing with you can be kinda pointless.... >_> If you want to keep thinking they are facts, and ignore eveything we all have been saying, I can't do anything else.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#286 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
And they failed to execute those new designs as well as FF executed it's "generic" design.789shadow
Maybe or maybe not, but that wasn't quoted in the reviews. They merely called the games unoriginal. That was the standard for ranking them so low; unoriginality. By that standard, Final Fantasy should be sub 7s as well.
Avatar image for scoobiesnackarf
scoobiesnackarf

1559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#287 scoobiesnackarf
Member since 2005 • 1559 Posts

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

This discussion is getting nowhere...

789shadow

I agree. Bottom line: everything related to games is subject to opinion. Except sales numbers. Now I have better things to do.

Except Gamespot shows bias by not being consistent in their review policy. They have one standard for consoles and another for PC. As is being discussed, games like Final Fantasy get 9's across the board yet PC games are given the shaft for being "unoriginal" when every FF is the same.
Avatar image for Generalmojo
Generalmojo

3670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#288 Generalmojo
Member since 2008 • 3670 Posts

lol thats it? please only Empire total war is the best from their, everything else is meh

Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#289 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

[QUOTE="789shadow"]

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

This discussion is getting nowhere...

scoobiesnackarf

I agree. Bottom line: everything related to games is subject to opinion. Except sales numbers. Now I have better things to do.

Except Gamespot shows bias by not being consistent in their review policy. They have one standard for consoles and another for PC. As is being discussed, games like Final Fantasy get 9's across the board yet PC games are given the shaft for being "unoriginal" when every FF is the same.

According to you. The MVP statement of this discussion.

Avatar image for Puckhog04
Puckhog04

22814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#290 Puckhog04
Member since 2003 • 22814 Posts

PC owns. Considering that it has the most exclusives (yes, it does. Consistently every year, AAA and AA) and has the best multiplats. I could go into many more reasons such as KB/Mouse, more players online on PC, $600-$750 for a PC that is 3x as powerful as any console, etc etc. But i don't need to. Frankly, the platform speaks for itself. PC has and always will own. :)

Avatar image for scoobiesnackarf
scoobiesnackarf

1559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#291 scoobiesnackarf
Member since 2005 • 1559 Posts

PC owns. Considering that it has the most exclusives (yes, it does. Consistently every year, AAA and AA) and has the best multiplats. I could go into many more reasons such as KB/Mouse, more players online on PC, $600-$750 for a PC that is 3x as powerful as any console, etc etc. But i don't need to. Frankly, the platform speaks for itself. PC has and always will own. :)

Puckhog04
Bingo. All one has to do is visit the link in your sin from Adrian Werner. Unfortunately the console only owners refuse to look at proof.
Avatar image for xsubtownerx
xsubtownerx

10705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#292 xsubtownerx
Member since 2007 • 10705 Posts

[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"]Any exclusive JRPGs on the PC for 09? Oh wait..Bebi_vegeta

And then?

And then what? That alone makes the PC less appealing to RPG gamers. In fact, what top notch RPG is the PC getting this year?
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#293 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29845 Posts
[QUOTE="scoobiesnackarf"]I agree. The problem is that many console only folks don't want to take the time to learn. They also fall for the lie that it costs OMGZE $20,000!!! to build a PC. Oh well, they are missing out on the best library in the business.

not really. i've nothing against PC gaming, but aside from a few titles, it really just doesn't interest me all that much.
Avatar image for agentfred
agentfred

5666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#294 agentfred
Member since 2003 • 5666 Posts
And then what? That alone makes the PC less appealing to RPG gamers. In fact, what top notch RPG is the PC getting this year?xsubtownerx
King's Bounty: Armored Princess. I honestly believe Armored Princess will be the best RPG this year, on any of the four major systems.
Avatar image for scoobiesnackarf
scoobiesnackarf

1559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#295 scoobiesnackarf
Member since 2005 • 1559 Posts
[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"]And then what? That alone makes the PC less appealing to RPG gamers. In fact, what top notch RPG is the PC getting this year?agentfred
King's Bounty: Armored Princess. I honestly believe Armored Princess will be the best RPG this year, on any of the four major systems.

This. Console owners cannot name an RPG coming out in 09 that will touch Armored Princess.
Avatar image for death919
death919

4724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#296 death919
Member since 2004 • 4724 Posts
[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"]And then what? That alone makes the PC less appealing to RPG gamers. In fact, what top notch RPG is the PC getting this year?agentfred
King's Bounty: Armored Princess. I honestly believe Armored Princess will be the best RPG this year, on any of the four major systems.

PC has all these obscure games I've never heard of becuase they don't get alot of press coverage lol. *looks into this game via youtube and stuff*
Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#297 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

[QUOTE="scoobiesnackarf"]I agree. The problem is that many console only folks don't want to take the time to learn. They also fall for the lie that it costs OMGZE $20,000!!! to build a PC. Oh well, they are missing out on the best library in the business.clone01
not really. i've nothing against PC gaming, but aside from a few titles, it really just doesn't interest me all that much.

So why are more than half the games you own for the 360 on the PC first, mutliplat with PC, or the better version is on the PC?

Avatar image for death919
death919

4724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#298 death919
Member since 2004 • 4724 Posts
[QUOTE="agentfred"][QUOTE="xsubtownerx"]And then what? That alone makes the PC less appealing to RPG gamers. In fact, what top notch RPG is the PC getting this year?death919
King's Bounty: Armored Princess. I honestly believe Armored Princess will be the best RPG this year, on any of the four major systems.

PC has all these obscure games I've never heard of becuase they don't get alot of press coverage lol. *looks into this game via youtube and stuff*

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynejlse2MVo I LOVE IT!!!
Avatar image for Marka1700
Marka1700

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#299 Marka1700
Member since 2003 • 7500 Posts
Can't wait for SC2. Zeno clash looks interesting. That others don't really interest me.
Avatar image for scoobiesnackarf
scoobiesnackarf

1559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#300 scoobiesnackarf
Member since 2005 • 1559 Posts
300 posts and still no response from console only owners with their game list.