PC the pawn of the 360?

  • 121 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for tader-salad
tader-salad

842

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 tader-salad
Member since 2008 • 842 Posts
The point is, when you buy a game that has the "games for windows" logo on top of the box, Microsoft is making money off of that purchase. I love how hermits are pretending that Microsoft plays little or no role in PC gaming, it is truly pathetic.
Avatar image for LockeAteid
LockeAteid

1210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 LockeAteid
Member since 2005 • 1210 Posts

The point is, when you buy a game that has the "games for windows" logo on top of the box, Microsoft is making money off of that purchase. I love how hermits are pretending that Microsoft plays little or no role in PC gaming, it is truly pathetic.tader-salad

They lose money on such games, not make it (unless it's their own published game which are few and far between).

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#103 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

Microsoft doesn't own PC gaming.rimnet00

/thread... Xbox360 and PC are not related.. The only close relation now is the supposed Xbox live connection which has been released on a few subpar games for the pc that few bought..

And if anything the game for windows thing, microsoft is paying the companies to do that.. Why? So set standards can be made.. Even then not every game agrees with it.

Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#104 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

The point is, when you buy a game that has the "games for windows" logo on top of the box, Microsoft is making money off of that purchase. I love how hermits are pretending that Microsoft plays little or no role in PC gaming, it is truly pathetic.tader-salad

any GFW title purchase doesn't gives MS a cent unless it devloped or published by them

Avatar image for tader-salad
tader-salad

842

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 tader-salad
Member since 2008 • 842 Posts

[QUOTE="tader-salad"]The point is, when you buy a game that has the "games for windows" logo on top of the box, Microsoft is making money off of that purchase. I love how hermits are pretending that Microsoft plays little or no role in PC gaming, it is truly pathetic.naval

any GFW title purchase doesn't gives MS a cent unless it devloped or published by them

Then why put the "games for windows" logo on the game? To make it look pretty?
Avatar image for LockeAteid
LockeAteid

1210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 LockeAteid
Member since 2005 • 1210 Posts
[QUOTE="naval"]

[QUOTE="tader-salad"]The point is, when you buy a game that has the "games for windows" logo on top of the box, Microsoft is making money off of that purchase. I love how hermits are pretending that Microsoft plays little or no role in PC gaming, it is truly pathetic.tader-salad

any GFW title purchase doesn't gives MS a cent unless it devloped or published by them

Then why put the "games for windows" logo on the game? To make it look pretty?

Gives the illusion of ownership over something they have no control over.

Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#107 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts
[QUOTE="naval"]

[QUOTE="tader-salad"]The point is, when you buy a game that has the "games for windows" logo on top of the box, Microsoft is making money off of that purchase. I love how hermits are pretending that Microsoft plays little or no role in PC gaming, it is truly pathetic.tader-salad

any GFW title purchase doesn't gives MS a cent unless it devloped or published by them

Then why put the "games for windows" logo on the game? To make it look pretty?

advertising for which MS most probably pays the dev, same as the 'nvidia/ati' logos you see many times on starting a game

Avatar image for jangojay
jangojay

4044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#108 jangojay
Member since 2007 • 4044 Posts
[QUOTE="naval"]

[QUOTE="tader-salad"]The point is, when you buy a game that has the "games for windows" logo on top of the box, Microsoft is making money off of that purchase. I love how hermits are pretending that Microsoft plays little or no role in PC gaming, it is truly pathetic.tader-salad

any GFW title purchase doesn't gives MS a cent unless it devloped or published by them

Then why put the "games for windows" logo on the game? To make it look pretty?

Yes it is to look pretty as well as

The Games for Windows brand on games means four key things:

1)Quality. Games for Windows branded titles undergo extensive testing, and not just by the publisher. Microsoft also invests in quality checking each title to ensure they meet performance and reliability standards.

2)Compatibility. Games for Windows branded titles work on Windows XP and Windows Vista based PCs, including both 32 and 64 bit editions. Games for Windows titles that support controllers are also compatible with the Microsoft XBOX 360 controller for Windows, including the XBOX 360 Wireless Gaming Receiver for Windows. They even support widescreen resolutions and more.

3)Safety features. You can be confident that any title carrying the Games for Windows brand will support the new parental controls and family settings features in Windows Vista.

4)Easy to Play. Games for Windows branded titles are easy to install, find and remove, especially in Windows Vista. Every Games for Windows title appears in the new Windows Vista Games Explorer (no more hunting around the start menu for that game you just installed). And Games for Windows branded titles all offer some form of "easy install", putting you in the game more quickly.

See they don't make a dime off of anything with the logo, the logo is just saying those points above. No wonder crysis worked with my 360 controller so well.

http://www.gamesforwindows.com/en-US/AboutGFW/Pages/gamesforwindows.aspx

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#109 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts
The point is, when you buy a game that has the "games for windows" logo on top of the box, Microsoft is making money off of that purchase. I love how hermits are pretending that Microsoft plays little or no role in PC gaming, it is truly pathetic.tader-salad
Actualy it's MS that's paying publishers to put the logo on the box, not the other way around
Avatar image for tader-salad
tader-salad

842

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 tader-salad
Member since 2008 • 842 Posts
OK, let me ask this. What is the OS that you all are currently using?
Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

The point is, when you buy a game that has the "games for windows" logo on top of the box, Microsoft is making money off of that purchase. I love how hermits are pretending that Microsoft plays little or no role in PC gaming, it is truly pathetic.tader-salad

Its an open platform, you have no clue what that means.

You may as well claim that roads own all cars because cars drive on them.

Avatar image for rimnet00
rimnet00

11003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#112 rimnet00
Member since 2003 • 11003 Posts

OK, let me ask this. What is the OS that you all are currently using?tader-salad

At the moment I'm running multiple virtual machines of both windows and linux.

Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#113 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

OK, let me ask this. What is the OS that you all are currently using?tader-salad

i use xp , then again I use nvidia'a gpu, intel's cpu etc which i have bought specifically for gaming where as xp i would have bought regardless of the fact i game on my pc or not. so who makes money because i play games on my pc ?

Avatar image for LockeAteid
LockeAteid

1210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 LockeAteid
Member since 2005 • 1210 Posts

OK, let me ask this. What is the OS that you all are currently using?tader-salad

Running a Parallel right now, so have both Leopard and XP going right now.

Avatar image for t3hTwinky
t3hTwinky

3701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#115 t3hTwinky
Member since 2005 • 3701 Posts

OK, let me ask this. What is the OS that you all are currently using?tader-salad

Why does it matter? MS doesn't make money off games they don't publish, and they have no say over what developers put through Windows. If we weren't using Windows, we would be using something else. MS doesn't own PC gaming, and whenever I buy a game for PC thats also out for the 360, MS loses that sale.

Avatar image for blackdreamhunk
blackdreamhunk

3880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 blackdreamhunk
Member since 2007 • 3880 Posts

title is bound to attract a lot of attention. well hear me out.

1. MS wants more games for the 360 that arent on PS3. Makes sense if you want to be competitive.

2. To do that, why not leech off of upcoming PC releases and strike deals to make ONLY a 360 port?

So basically the PC is helping the 360 to compete against the PS3.

Has anybody thought of it like this?

-GhostMLD-
I would have to agree with you I think that sony is catching on sony is now starting to realse games for both pc and concole however Ms has the upper hand because of operating systems that alot pc use
Avatar image for the1stfandb
the1stfandb

2397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#117 the1stfandb
Member since 2007 • 2397 Posts

No system is a pawn to another, but 360 is a pawn of MS(duh) and pc is a pawn to any and everyone who contributes to it.

Avatar image for lettuceman44
lettuceman44

7971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#118 lettuceman44
Member since 2005 • 7971 Posts

[QUOTE="tader-salad"]The point is, when you buy a game that has the "games for windows" logo on top of the box, Microsoft is making money off of that purchase. I love how hermits are pretending that Microsoft plays little or no role in PC gaming, it is truly pathetic.tenaka2

Its an open platform, you have no clue what that means.

You may as well claim that roads own all cars because cars drive on them.

Games for Windows is just a campaign by MS. They make no money of it at all.....
Avatar image for xsubtownerx
xsubtownerx

10705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#119 xsubtownerx
Member since 2007 • 10705 Posts
[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"][QUOTE="rimnet00"]

The only claim you made is that the oil industry owns the car manafactuerers, which doesn't exactly relate to my signature. So it begs the question: what are you talking about?

rimnet00

Your sig proves your ignorance.

There's no cars without oil.

Thinking otherwise is ignorant.

Did that clear it up?

Please explain to me how the message being portrayed in my signature is ignorant. Claiming someone is ignorant, without backing it up with anything substantial just makes you look like a fool. Anyone can make accusations, even babbling 3 year olds. Quite clearly you are missing the humor behind the signature, which only goes to show that you are taking this message board way too seriously, and personally.

Full version of Mass Effect coming to PC? How is that NOT being ignorant? maybe even a little arrogant also. Even if it is a joke, it's in your sig which represents you and your personal beliefs on a certain brand or game. Joke or not.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

Full version of Mass Effect coming to PC? How is that NOT being ignorant? maybe even a little arrogant also. Even if it is a joke, it's in your sig which represents you and your personal beliefs on a certain brand or game. Joke or not.

xsubtownerx

Mass Effect is comming to PC................... With all the techincal and design issues fixed + extra content.

It was announced ages ago.

What are you rambling on about?

:|

Avatar image for aliblabla2007
aliblabla2007

16756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#121 aliblabla2007
Member since 2007 • 16756 Posts
[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"]

Full version of Mass Effect coming to PC? How is that NOT being ignorant? maybe even a little arrogant also. Even if it is a joke, it's in your sig which represents you and your personal beliefs on a certain brand or game. Joke or not.

skrat_01

Mass Effect is comming to PC................... With all the techincal and design issues fixed + extra content.

It was announced ages ago.

What are you rambling on about?

:|

Definitely a case of "who's the ignorant one here?" :lol:

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

Full version of Mass Effect coming to PC? How is that NOT being ignorant? maybe even a little arrogant also. Even if it is a joke, it's in your sig which represents you and your personal beliefs on a certain brand or game. Joke or not.

xsubtownerx

You have to admit its funny though :)