Piracy killing PC gaming? (Poll)

  • 146 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kris9031998
kris9031998

7554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#51 kris9031998
Member since 2008 • 7554 Posts
[QUOTE="theshadowhunter"]

DRM is killing PC gaming, DRM = more pirates, its how it is. If a game has too much DRM, more people will pirate it.

wis3boi
Yep, because the pirate copy ends up being the better one :D

Biggest case in point: From ****ing Dust. They even promised no DRM, then.....DRM. Plus the game was a terrible port, i mean the FPS cap was 30 and the only movement was by mouse.... The reason i will never buy a Ubisoft game ....ever.
Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

I'm going to refrain from the grossly erroneous notion of what ever it is that is "killing PC gaming". But what I do think that is most detrimental to that platform isn't so much the piracy, but rather the developer/publisher counter measures.

While I understand their need to protect their interests and their rights to see a profit from their product, every effort has never actually deterred the pirates, and in fact has just the opposite effect of penalizing the honest players out there. The ones who were actually paying for their game have an obstacle course to navigate through to get their legitmate copy to run. Meanwhile not only were the pirates in no way blocked off, with the DRM bypassed they even had an unhindered installation and are getting right into the game with no delay.

From stardock to that required online connection even for sp games, it seems like the honest players have the hardest time of it while the pirates are laughing in the face of the developers.

Now from this I am in no way advocating piracy to "fight back against DRM". Nothing like that at all. But what ever the devs and publishers are doing to protect their interests (which is well within their rights) must never come at the cost of the honest gamers entitlement to what they payed for, and certainly not at their inconvenience.

slvrraven9

with every post you remind me of why i am tracking you

Ah, that reminds me. I gotta upgrade my cloak, now with thermal masking too ;) :P

Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11898 Posts

[QUOTE="Moriarity_"]Nope, but drm sure is. Big name devs/publishers need to take notes from CD: Projekt. They released the Witcher 2 drm free and the game still sold very well. If you make a good game then people will buy it, the pirates are going to pirate the game either way.HaloinventedFPS

it was singleplayer only aswell, thats the best part, since people say PC gamers only buy multiplayer games

Oh let's not forget STALKER it had multiplayer but it was complete crap :lol: all them managed to sell over 2 million their first year.

Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11898 Posts

wow how can you say no? if piracy didnt exist, then such games would still be exclusive to PC (like battlefield 3) and there would be no "dumbed down ports" the results are shocking, i thought people on system wars know better.sethman410

DICE could of easily kept Battlefield 3 as a PC exclusive (which it was intended to be in the first place when they first started developing it) since all the battlefield titles on PC have done well. It was EA which owns DICE decided to make them go multiplat with the game as an attempt to cash in on the CoD sales. Plus games like Battlefield aren't affected by piracy.

Avatar image for SW__Troll
SW__Troll

1687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 SW__Troll
Member since 2011 • 1687 Posts

Piracy isn't actually causing any problems on the PC.

The real problem is the misconception that console games = PC games, and that PC gamers would be buying games like GTA, or Modern Warfare in the millions if it weren't for piracy.

Those games never will sell millions on the PC because they aren't what PC gamers want.


There's a reason the most successful PC titles are just that; PC titles. STALKER, The Witcher, Half Life, Starcraft, Minecraft, Football Manager, Battlefield, etc. These games do sell millions on the PC. Most console games don't even match the sales of these exclusives either. Only do the super-hyped, mega-blockbusters tend to sell more.

Avatar image for joel_c17
joel_c17

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 joel_c17
Member since 2005 • 3206 Posts
Nothing is killing pc gaming
Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#57 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts
Using the infallible Pachter logic, we can conclude that it is confirmed beyond a shadow of doubt that Piracy is not killing PC gaming.
Avatar image for emanc93
emanc93

216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 emanc93
Member since 2005 • 216 Posts

It's starting to affect the business model. Free-to-play, cash shops, etc. Giving PC players an investment in the game and paying for in-game content. It has worked really well for a lot of titles. I think we will see less and less big budget titles for PCs, and smaller more financially viable releases. I am actually doing a research paper on the issue of piracy in gaming and I really like Gabe Newell's thoughts on gaming. Something to the effect of giving a better service than pirates as opposed to restrictive measures on the content.

Avatar image for Mr_Cumberdale
Mr_Cumberdale

10189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#59 Mr_Cumberdale
Member since 2004 • 10189 Posts
Was there really any 'PC gaming' in the first place? If you look back at the PCs past, there has never been a blockbuster or a must-have game.
Avatar image for RandomWinner
RandomWinner

3751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 RandomWinner
Member since 2010 • 3751 Posts

Did Halo really invent FPS?

TecmoGirl

/thread

That was brilliant :lol:

Avatar image for slvrraven9
slvrraven9

9278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#61 slvrraven9
Member since 2004 • 9278 Posts
[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

[QUOTE="slvrraven9"][QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

I'm going to refrain from the grossly erroneous notion of what ever it is that is "killing PC gaming". But what I do think that is most detrimental to that platform isn't so much the piracy, but rather the developer/publisher counter measures.

While I understand their need to protect their interests and their rights to see a profit from their product, every effort has never actually deterred the pirates, and in fact has just the opposite effect of penalizing the honest players out there. The ones who were actually paying for their game have an obstacle course to navigate through to get their legitmate copy to run. Meanwhile not only were the pirates in no way blocked off, with the DRM bypassed they even had an unhindered installation and are getting right into the game with no delay.

From stardock to that required online connection even for sp games, it seems like the honest players have the hardest time of it while the pirates are laughing in the face of the developers.

Now from this I am in no way advocating piracy to "fight back against DRM". Nothing like that at all. But what ever the devs and publishers are doing to protect their interests (which is well within their rights) must never come at the cost of the honest gamers entitlement to what they payed for, and certainly not at their inconvenience.

with every post you remind me of why i am tracking you

Ah, that reminds me. I gotta upgrade my cloak, now with thermal masking too ;) :P

thats ok, i have a heartbeat sensor! lol, ill still find you!
Avatar image for slvrraven9
slvrraven9

9278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#62 slvrraven9
Member since 2004 • 9278 Posts
Was there really any 'PC gaming' in the first place? If you look back at the PCs past, there has never been a blockbuster or a must-have game.Mr_Cumberdale
joke post?? cause i.....i dont even........................!?????
Avatar image for hypoty
hypoty

2825

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 hypoty
Member since 2009 • 2825 Posts

Was there really any 'PC gaming' in the first place? If you look back at the PCs past, there has never been a blockbuster or a must-have game.Mr_Cumberdale

Really? Does having the most high scoring exclusives this generation not mean anything unless ads for those games are plastered on billboards and bus-stops?

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62044 Posts

Was there really any 'PC gaming' in the first place? If you look back at the PCs past, there has never been a blockbuster or a must-have game.Mr_Cumberdale

Ahhhh, once again, your posts enlighten us all. Thanks Cumberdale.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
Was there really any 'PC gaming' in the first place? If you look back at the PCs past, there has never been a blockbuster or a must-have game.Mr_Cumberdale
:| Not even going to bother
Avatar image for arto1223
arto1223

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#66 arto1223
Member since 2005 • 4412 Posts

To his defense, he was talking about retail PC gaming, which we all know is dieing. I thing that it's dieing because of digital PC gaming though, not piracy.

Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#67 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

You can't be so dense and defensive that you can't admit Piracy is damaging PC gaming. Whether or not you think its dying (and that depends on your definition I guess), piracy is a major roadblock for PC gaming.

Constant delays, lowered publisher support, etc. The PC is a haven for indie games nowadays, but the days of big budget exclusives are shrinking fast. When a company isn't putting a DRM to stop it (which only causes entitled pirates to pirate harder), they're sticking product codes and in the most drastic cases, just outright ignoring the PC (like with Rockstar). It doesn't help that companies that avoid DRM's and still give PC games at the same time and level of quality on consoles, just get it worse (MW series anyone?)

I don't think PC gaming is dying. I think in a sense its flourishing from the indie support and the DD, as well as consoles being at this point in their life span. But overall, with piracy combined with rising costs and no such thing as first party companies behind the face of PC exclusive gaming (like Microsoft once was before Xbox), then I don't see PC exclusive big budget games for longer.

Again, multiplats will still flourish as long as you have an audience and the PC retains its individual functions from consoles, but I think piracy (along with a host of other things) means your favorite exclusives like S.T.A.LK.E.R, Diablo, and Crysis are going to consoles so publishers can make more money, and appease more people.

Still, some indie games can be just as amazing as any big budget game (such as Amnesia), so that's not too bad. I don't see a return to the 90's era golden age of PC gaming, but its far from dead, its just changing paths.

Avatar image for BygByron3
BygByron3

5572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 BygByron3
Member since 2003 • 5572 Posts

Constant delays, lowered publisher support, etc. The PC is a haven for indie games nowadays, but the days of big budget exclusives are shrinking fast. When a company isn't putting a DRM to stop it (which only causes entitled pirates to pirate harder), they're sticking product codes and in the most drastic cases, just outright ignoring the PC (like with Rockstar). It doesn't help that companies that avoid DRM's and still give PC games at the same time and level of quality on consoles, just get it worse (MW series anyone?)SPYDER0416
The golden age of the 90s; maybe they should bring back shareware!

Avatar image for Grawse
Grawse

4342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 Grawse
Member since 2010 • 4342 Posts

[QUOTE="Mr_Cumberdale"]Was there really any 'PC gaming' in the first place? If you look back at the PCs past, there has never been a blockbuster or a must-have game.lundy86_4

Ahhhh, once again, your posts enlighten us all. Thanks Cumberdale.

Everytime he posts I always have this look on my face

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts
[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]Can you pirate Skyrim and MW3 on PC? no, can you on Xbox 360? yes. People are really uneducated about this subject.gamebreakerz__
I think to an extent you are uneducated. There is Piracy on Consoles, but by just taking a quick look at a torrent site I see over 15000 people seeding the top BF3 download on PC, with the 360 one having 600 and the PS3 having 400. While piracy is not killing PC gaming, saying the problem on consoles is just as bad is just plain ignorant.

Except you can't play online on the PC version. Therefore, the PC version is worthless.
Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#71 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

I don't see a return to the 90's era golden age of PC gaming

SPYDER0416

Actually, what we're seeing now is the return to 90s golden era, specicially to the first half of that decade. Just like then PC gaming is now dominated by small devs and more niche genres.

What we won't see is the return of 2000-2005, but that's good thing, because back then the rise of big budgeted exclusives killed pretty much everything else.

Now, there will always be big budgeted PC exclusives, if only because some games just don't work on consoles all that well. What we've lost are just big budgeted exclusive FPSes and RPGs (MMOs excluded), but I'm fine with that because this means ressurgence of other more niche genres. As it's been shown before...you can't have both.

Avatar image for DethSkematik
DethSkematik

3900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 117

User Lists: 0

#72 DethSkematik
Member since 2008 • 3900 Posts
I agree. Retail PC games are a thing of the past in this day and age (good or bad, it's really up to the individual) and even then, most of them are usually tied to some kind of digital service anyway. I usually buy a retail PC game if it's too freaking big for me to download (like Battlefield 3 and Rage). Anyway, I find it odd that computers are still in the limelight when it comes to piracy, yet so few acknowledge that even consoles share the same plague :?.
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

If PC gaming were to die. All of gaming would die

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#74 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

If PC gaming were to die. All of gaming would die

BPoole96

How would it kill handhelds and Nintendo/Sony?

Avatar image for zeta
zeta

1189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#75 zeta
Member since 2003 • 1189 Posts

[QUOTE="TecmoGirl"]

Did Halo really invent FPS?

HaloinventedFPS

sure it did

I need you to watch this video (and all his other videos while you're at it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aipGP5oAuWQ

In other words, NO, Halo did NOT invent FPS.

Just because my first fps was Wolfenstein 3D, doesn't mean that it invented the FPS genre.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#76 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

I think piracy is hurting PC gaming (Devs and Publishers), but its not killing it. Devs and Publishers just have to find better ways to combat piracy other than always on internet connection. There are more creative ways out therenavyguy21
I don't think that's true. I think sales are elevated because of piracy. More people who talk about games, who try out the games. And the consumer money is spend, it's not like consumers are good at saving.
People can't spend less than nothing on it, and if they like what they see they might buy it at a discount.
I also think pirates tend to be people who spend the most money on games. What if you want more games than your money can buy you? If you want games that badly that you spend a ton of money on them I think you'd be all the more likely to pirate the rest.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#77 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

If PC gaming were to die. All of gaming would die

Bigboi500

How would it kill handhelds and Nintendo/Sony?

I don't agree with him. It wouldn't kill gaming. It would however cripple it permemently. It would just be a sad shadow of it's former self.

Avatar image for DoomZaW
DoomZaW

6475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#78 DoomZaW
Member since 2007 • 6475 Posts

If there is anything that's killing pc gaming, then it's poor ports (rockstar AHEM!)

Avatar image for DoomZaW
DoomZaW

6475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#79 DoomZaW
Member since 2007 • 6475 Posts

Was there really any 'PC gaming' in the first place? If you look back at the PCs past, there has never been a blockbuster or a must-have game.Mr_Cumberdale

Diablo? Starcraft? Quake 3? Unreal tournament 2004? Battlefield 2? World of Warcraft? Witcher? Deus Ex?

Avatar image for telefanatic
telefanatic

3008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 telefanatic
Member since 2007 • 3008 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"] How is that relevant, it still shows that there is much more pirating on PC than consoles. Take MW3 for instance, it has 1700 seeders on the 360 right now and 3700 on the PC. Not only is it a console shooter, but the PC version is UNPLAYABLE. It has no crack and it is listed in the title as not working, yet there are still more people downloading it that the working 360 version!gamebreakerz__
And what is the install base of the 360. Like 50-60 million? It was estimated in 2008 that there was 263 million ONLINE PC gamers in the world. 1700/50,000,000 >>> 3700/260,000,000 (plus all the not-online gamers) It is all relative.

So? More people buy COD on 360 than PC, but more people pirate COD on PC than 360, that should be the real comparison. Plus MW3 shouldn't be used in this example since it is unplayable on PC so far, so take BF3 with 25x more pirates on PC than 360 and you get the picture.

No one is using torrents anymore, everyone uses links, which you extract and get the iso, so those numbers are irrelevant.

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#81 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

I voted yes for a complete laugh but in sheer honesty the only piracy we should bother about is that stuff in Somalia :P

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#82 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17983 Posts
I don't know, but I wonder-why is there DRM if piracy is not a threat? If it's not an issue, then what's the reason for it? It's certainly not for our health.
Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#83 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

I don't know, but I wonder-why is there DRM if piracy is not a threat? If it's not an issue, then what's the reason for it? It's certainly not for our health. MirkoS77
One reason might be that they think piracy is a threat and are wrong, or use it as a scapegoat. When you are employed you need to ensure you stay employed, and the best way to do that is to pass blame and look good while in actuality doing as little as humanly possible.
Another reason for DRM or anything alike DRM is to limit consumer freedom. They are pushing for a model in which every person has to buy a license to play for every bit, on every platform they want to play on. The reason for that is money. I don't even need their theories or ideas or excuses to know they are going after this. You can make someone pay 100 times 10 more easily than 800 in one go.
Look at the PS3 launch, a lot of comments about the price. And then 5 years later basically everyone who purchased a 360 at launch paid more than the PS3 launch price, because there were segmented and hidden costs. They want us to pay per player, per portion of a game, per platform. You can't take your games to friends, your game will always be incomplete and it is all locked to your account that you can be banned from.
That is at least on short terms the most profitable formula for a game publisher. In the long run all those nickle n dime and deceitful systems tend to fail but never fully disappear, because they never want to think of a new system but only to adjust the failing system, kind of like capitalism.

Avatar image for rastotm
rastotm

1380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 rastotm
Member since 2011 • 1380 Posts

It seems like half of the people in this board are convinced that they are superior to the big bosses behind most games.
The sad thing is, I believe that it is true. The gaming industry seems to be controlled by nitwits who have no feel for the game industry as they have no experience in it.

Overly blaming piracy, yet not taking decent measures to counter it.
Instead of rewarding people who bought the game with additinal content and extra's, they punish the people who buy the game. The worst thing yet, all these so called measures against piracy don't work, the crackers in the industry are superior to the coders of protective measures.

They are making exact the same mistake as the fight against music piracy, don't fight a battle you can't win, adopt and find the profit elsewhere. Annoying actual buyers with higher prices and frustrating software leads to nothing but the destruction of the franchise that you are trying to sell.

A little note,
Piracy isn't just done by unethical immoral thieves, piracy is done by dissatisfied costumers aswell!

Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

well Gabe Newell said piracy doesnt matter

ill take his word over anyone else in the industry, any sane person would aswell, but go ahead and trust greedy corps like microsoft, Activision and take two (rockstar) over Valves

Avatar image for PC360Wii
PC360Wii

4658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 PC360Wii
Member since 2007 • 4658 Posts
The big problem is you have console aimed developers, or even old pc centric devs trying to cater to consoles, in doing so they dont stop and think "hmmm, maybe my devided resources wont take advantage of what PC gamers love and what the system has to offer" ... instead its just piracy? right yea ok...
Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#87 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

well Gabe Newell said piracy doesnt matter

ill take his word over anyone else in the industry, any sane person would aswell, but go ahead and trust greedy corps like microsoft, Activision and take two (rockstar) over Valves

HaloinventedFPS

And valve isnt greedy either? all compannies are greedy they aint charities.

Everyone has diffrent views on the matters at hand and approaches to said matter.

Avatar image for PC360Wii
PC360Wii

4658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 PC360Wii
Member since 2007 • 4658 Posts

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

well Gabe Newell said piracy doesnt matter

ill take his word over anyone else in the industry, any sane person would aswell, but go ahead and trust greedy corps like microsoft, Activision and take two (rockstar) over Valves

razgriz_101

And valve isnt greedy either? all compannies are greedy they aint charities.

Everyone has diffrent views on the matters at hand and approaches to said matter.

I agree with this, many other PC gamers worship the ground Blizzard and Valve walk on despite both of them only being nice about piracy because they make pretty much online online games with decent SP's thrown on, Blizzard make an insane ammount from WoW to not even notice piracy. VALVE earn a giant chunk of revanue from PC Game sales and thier own games... both companies have greedy pay for DLC like pets, hats ect. I absolutely despise Blizz/VALVE fanboys.... they are some of the greediest companies out there now.
Avatar image for ZombieKiller7
ZombieKiller7

6463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#89 ZombieKiller7
Member since 2011 • 6463 Posts

Piracy hurts PC gaming a little bit, but DRM is standing over it with a crowbar beating it into a coma.

DRM is a reason I won't buy Driver SF on PC but I'll rent it for 360.

DRM is a reason I didn't get the new Starcraft.

DRM is the reason I won't be getting Diablo 3.

De-centralization is another reason I tend not to buy games for PC. I don't want to sign up for Origin. Why can't I just buy everything on Steam? Why should I have to type in the name of a Teamspeak server, why can't I just click "chat" and talk to my friend? Why can't all of my achievments, purchases and social interactions all be in the same place?

Why do I have to remember the password to 12 different services just to play a game online?

I power on my 360 - my friends are there, the achievements are there, the chat is there, my fat butt is on the couch, it's EASY to relax and have fun.

At one point Steam was the savior of PC gaming, by bringing all this under one roof.

And now crappy EA and probably MS want to shoehorn into on the action and fragment the community by turning 1 click into 12 clicks and a login prompt.

God forbid if my crappy internet goes down (have to reboot my router 2-3 times a night) then my game just stops?

And that doesn't seem a little...you know...anti-customer?

I'm done explaining it, video game companies are out to lunch without a sandwich, it's clear to me that none of these "gaming" execs are actually gamers or unerstand the habits of their customers, how people USE their products and what they expect.

Your morality finger-wagging about piracy sounds hollow.

When publishers and devs do crappy things to customers we say "it's just business."

But when players do bad things it's "oh please don't pirate our stuff, it's immoral."

Putting out half a game and selling the other half thru DLC is immoral too.

Xbox Live $60/year to use your own internet is immoral.

Online pass is immoral.

"Always on" is immoral.

You guys have some nerve saying "piracy is killing PC gaming."

It's YOU who is killing it. EA, Activision, Microsuck, YOU are killing PC gaming.

Avatar image for SW__Troll
SW__Troll

1687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 SW__Troll
Member since 2011 • 1687 Posts

[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

well Gabe Newell said piracy doesnt matter

ill take his word over anyone else in the industry, any sane person would aswell, but go ahead and trust greedy corps like microsoft, Activision and take two (rockstar) over Valves

PC360Wii

And valve isnt greedy either? all compannies are greedy they aint charities.

Everyone has diffrent views on the matters at hand and approaches to said matter.

I agree with this, many other PC gamers worship the ground Blizzard and Valve walk on despite both of them only being nice about piracy because they make pretty much online online games with decent SP's thrown on, Blizzard make an insane ammount from WoW to not even notice piracy. VALVE earn a giant chunk of revanue from PC Game sales and thier own games... both companies have greedy pay for DLC like pets, hats ect. I absolutely despise Blizz/VALVE fanboys.... they are some of the greediest companies out there now.

Well would you guys trust this guy, among others, on Youtube who state that piracy has actually increased the sales of their products because there was more awareness for them?

Gamespot never let's me link....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Qkyt1wXNlI

Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#91 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

3 important points;

  • Console games are pirated weeks before PC games
  • Console games don't need to be cracked
  • More people own Xbox360 (for example) than a PC capable of playing the latest PC titles (since said PCs cost £3000)
Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#92 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts
[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

well Gabe Newell said piracy doesnt matter

ill take his word over anyone else in the industry, any sane person would aswell, but go ahead and trust greedy corps like microsoft, Activision and take two (rockstar) over Valves

PC360Wii

And valve isnt greedy either? all compannies are greedy they aint charities.

Everyone has diffrent views on the matters at hand and approaches to said matter.

I agree with this, many other PC gamers worship the ground Blizzard and Valve walk on despite both of them only being nice about piracy because they make pretty much online online games with decent SP's thrown on, Blizzard make an insane ammount from WoW to not even notice piracy. VALVE earn a giant chunk of revanue from PC Game sales and thier own games... both companies have greedy pay for DLC like pets, hats ect. I absolutely despise Blizz/VALVE fanboys.... they are some of the greediest companies out there now.

Pets from WoW aren't DLC, they are completely optional trinkets (not actualy equippable trinkets) that do absolutely nothing other than an asthetic effect. The money also goes to charity. I don't think there's anything in WoW that's sold as DLC or is equippable/useable to gain any advantage or use in combat. Everything is for asthetics and charity afaik.
Avatar image for PC360Wii
PC360Wii

4658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 PC360Wii
Member since 2007 • 4658 Posts

[QUOTE="PC360Wii"][QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

And valve isnt greedy either? all compannies are greedy they aint charities.

Everyone has diffrent views on the matters at hand and approaches to said matter.

-Unreal-

I agree with this, many other PC gamers worship the ground Blizzard and Valve walk on despite both of them only being nice about piracy because they make pretty much online online games with decent SP's thrown on, Blizzard make an insane ammount from WoW to not even notice piracy. VALVE earn a giant chunk of revanue from PC Game sales and thier own games... both companies have greedy pay for DLC like pets, hats ect. I absolutely despise Blizz/VALVE fanboys.... they are some of the greediest companies out there now.

Pets from WoW aren't DLC, they are completely optional trinkets (not actualy equippable trinkets) that do absolutely nothing other than an asthetic effect. The money also goes to charity. I don't think there's anything in WoW that's sold as DLC or is equippable/useable to gain any advantage or use in combat. Everything is for asthetics and charity afaik.

DLC is DLC ... downloadable content, if you want to complete the collections you have to pay extortionate prices instead of just unlocking them through play. and now with the pokemon like feature coming in the next expansion? Point still stands, the only companies stating piracy si laughable is the rich few that have done thier fair share of shady market manipulations. ORIGIN forcing you to use it for BF3? CRIMINAL... Oh wait, steam did it from the start aswell :roll:

Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#94 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"][QUOTE="PC360Wii"] I agree with this, many other PC gamers worship the ground Blizzard and Valve walk on despite both of them only being nice about piracy because they make pretty much online online games with decent SP's thrown on, Blizzard make an insane ammount from WoW to not even notice piracy. VALVE earn a giant chunk of revanue from PC Game sales and thier own games... both companies have greedy pay for DLC like pets, hats ect. I absolutely despise Blizz/VALVE fanboys.... they are some of the greediest companies out there now. PC360Wii

Pets from WoW aren't DLC, they are completely optional trinkets (not actualy equippable trinkets) that do absolutely nothing other than an asthetic effect. The money also goes to charity. I don't think there's anything in WoW that's sold as DLC or is equippable/useable to gain any advantage or use in combat. Everything is for asthetics and charity afaik.

DLC is DLC ... downloadable content, if you want to complete the collections you have to pay extortionate prices instead of just unlocking them through play. and now with the pokemon like feature coming in the next expansion? Point still stands, the only companies stating piracy si laughable is the rich few that have done thier fair share of shady market manipulations. ORIGIN forcing you to use it for BF3? CRIMINAL... Oh wait, steam did it from the start aswell :roll:

You don't download anything, they are already in the game. They are charity items too. The money goes to charities. They have no effect on gameplay either. What I do disagree with are some prices for specific things they offer. However it's a grey area since if they were to lower those prices, they might not be able to handle the traffic without changing things.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Sure is 2006 in here. Anyway Pachter is an idiot, that's commonly known.
Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

well Gabe Newell said piracy doesnt matter

ill take his word over anyone else in the industry, any sane person would aswell, but go ahead and trust greedy corps like microsoft, Activision and take two (rockstar) over Valves

PC360Wii

And valve isnt greedy either? all compannies are greedy they aint charities.

Everyone has diffrent views on the matters at hand and approaches to said matter.

I agree with this, many other PC gamers worship the ground Blizzard and Valve walk on despite both of them only being nice about piracy because they make pretty much online online games with decent SP's thrown on, Blizzard make an insane ammount from WoW to not even notice piracy. VALVE earn a giant chunk of revanue from PC Game sales and thier own games... both companies have greedy pay for DLC like pets, hats ect. I absolutely despise Blizz/VALVE fanboys.... they are some of the greediest companies out there now.

i never said anything about Blizzard, but SC2 was pirated alot, Wow has many private servers (so will D3) and Blzzard dont care

and by the way, Valve said piracy didnt matter before Steam became a big hit, Valves 2 biggest games were singleplayer only (HL1/2)

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

DLC is DLC ... downloadable content, if you want to complete the collections you have to pay extortionate prices instead of just unlocking them through play. and now with the pokemon like feature coming in the next expansion? Point still stands, the only companies stating piracy si laughable is the rich few that have done thier fair share of shady market manipulations. ORIGIN forcing you to use it for BF3? CRIMINAL... Oh wait, steam did it from the start aswell :roll:

PC360Wii
They're cosmetic trinkets. There's no such thing as a 'complete collection' in WoW, you're applying horribly incorrect microtransaction logic, and ideas about e-commerce to the MMO.
Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"][QUOTE="PC360Wii"] I agree with this, many other PC gamers worship the ground Blizzard and Valve walk on despite both of them only being nice about piracy because they make pretty much online online games with decent SP's thrown on, Blizzard make an insane ammount from WoW to not even notice piracy. VALVE earn a giant chunk of revanue from PC Game sales and thier own games... both companies have greedy pay for DLC like pets, hats ect. I absolutely despise Blizz/VALVE fanboys.... they are some of the greediest companies out there now. PC360Wii

Pets from WoW aren't DLC, they are completely optional trinkets (not actualy equippable trinkets) that do absolutely nothing other than an asthetic effect. The money also goes to charity. I don't think there's anything in WoW that's sold as DLC or is equippable/useable to gain any advantage or use in combat. Everything is for asthetics and charity afaik.

DLC is DLC ... downloadable content, if you want to complete the collections you have to pay extortionate prices instead of just unlocking them through play. and now with the pokemon like feature coming in the next expansion? Point still stands, the only companies stating piracy si laughable is the rich few that have done thier fair share of shady market manipulations. ORIGIN forcing you to use it for BF3? CRIMINAL... Oh wait, steam did it from the start aswell :roll:

Origin is spyware, Steam isnt

Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

[QUOTE="PC360Wii"]

DLC is DLC ... downloadable content, if you want to complete the collections you have to pay extortionate prices instead of just unlocking them through play. and now with the pokemon like feature coming in the next expansion? Point still stands, the only companies stating piracy si laughable is the rich few that have done thier fair share of shady market manipulations. ORIGIN forcing you to use it for BF3? CRIMINAL... Oh wait, steam did it from the start aswell :roll:

skrat_01

They're cosmetic trinkets. There's no such thing as a 'complete collection' in WoW, you're applying horribly incorrect microtransaction logic, and ideas about e-commerce to the MMO.

you can buy the pets in game now with gold

Avatar image for jer_1
jer_1

7451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#100 jer_1
Member since 2003 • 7451 Posts

The main thing hurting PC's would be the consoles that are holding them back. Piracy definitely isn't doing it because every game worth actually owning is still being purchased in massive numbers, epecially when you consider all the multiplayer aspects of modern games. PC Gaming isn't dying at all from my perspective.