http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/ps3-and-360-sales-equal-in-2008-$1264624.htm
Any of you guys seen this before?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/ps3-and-360-sales-equal-in-2008-$1264624.htm
Any of you guys seen this before?
wow i was going to post that just a second ago. this is not good new for MS for being the cheaper console for 2 year PS3 being more expensive and in 08 holidays having the recession work against sony and still not being able to outsell the PS3
http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/ps3-and-360-sales-equal-in-2008-$1264624.htm
wow i was going to post that just a second ago. this is not good new for MS for being the cheaper console for 2 year PS3 being more expensive and in 08 holidays having the recession work against sony and still not being able to outsell the PS3
http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/ps3-and-360-sales-equal-in-2008-$1264624.htm
Ragashahs
really?
So you think that a MS system selling as much as a Sony system is no good news for MS??? Im sure that the fact PS3 is not selling 3 times more than the 360 is really bad news for sony :P
And the 8 million deficit that MS claimed is actually more like 7.1 million 21.35-28.45mmirza23When Aaron Greenburg was talking about the 8 million lead, he must have got his information from VGChartz.
Did you ever see the movie Rocky? In the end, Rocky didn't win. What was his accomplishment? He went 10 rounds with the best. The movie wasn't celebrating mediocrity, it was celebrating excelling far beyond expectations. And now PS3, which had been deemed this generation's certain victor even before launch is in 3rd place, while the scrappy underdog has cemented a place in front of them. If PS3 was celebrating a small lead, it would be celebrating mediocrity. But for a player like MS, who had to split 30% marketshare with Nintendo last generation, it's a victory
ANONYMOUS
I just haD to post Divinity's sig again, since it's so full of WIN.
Every bit of it is true. :)
EDIT: GlitchSpot strikes again :?
Wait what??? Only on system wars could someone be able to twist this into a good thing for Sony.wow i was going to post that just a second ago. this is not good new for MS for being the cheaper console for 2 year PS3 being more expensive and in 08 holidays having the recession work against sony and still not being able to outsell the PS3
http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/ps3-and-360-sales-equal-in-2008-$1264624.htm
Ragashahs
First I doubt they have the true numbers cause kinda hard to have them. Lets say they do though.
1) Sony first year sold more then the 360 and now they sold slightly less.
2) PS2 sold over 100 million consoles more then the X-box and now not only is the PS3 still in last place but AGAIN sold slightly less.
Reason I keep saying slightly less is cause The PlayStation 3 shipped around 10.8 million (closer to 10.78) and the Xbox 360 also shipped 10.8 million:
Also this is in Kotaku
PS3 sales are down 9% for oct-dec so PS3 sales are not going foward but are going backwards. The thrill of the Playstation name is wearing off.
wow i was going to post that just a second ago. this is not good new for MS for being the cheaper console for 2 year PS3 being more expensive and in 08 holidays having the recession work against sony and still not being able to outsell the PS3
http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/ps3-and-360-sales-equal-in-2008-$1264624.htm
Wait what??? Only on system wars could someone be able to twist this into a good thing for Sony. First I doubt they have the true numbers cause kinda hard to have them. Lets say they do though. 1) Sony first year sold more then the 360 and now they sold slightly less. 2) PS2 sold over 100 million consoles more then the X-box and now not only is the PS3 still in last place but AGAIN sold slightly less. Reason I keep saying slightly less is cause The PlayStation 3 shipped around 10.8 million (closer to 10.78) and the Xbox 360 also shipped 10.8 million: Also this is in Kotaku PS3 sales are down 9% for oct-dec so PS3 sales are not going foward but are going backwards. The thrill of the Playstation name is wearing off. Right so the first 8 months when the PS3 outsold the 360 this year had nothing to do with the playstation brand, it was because the prices of both consoles were similar. As soon as xbox cut their prices in September, they caught up in the 4 busiest months of the year, simple as that. It's all about price.[QUOTE="rybe1025"][QUOTE="Ragashahs"]Wait what??? Only on system wars could someone be able to twist this into a good thing for Sony. First I doubt they have the true numbers cause kinda hard to have them. Lets say they do though. 1) Sony first year sold more then the 360 and now they sold slightly less. 2) PS2 sold over 100 million consoles more then the X-box and now not only is the PS3 still in last place but AGAIN sold slightly less. Reason I keep saying slightly less is cause The PlayStation 3 shipped around 10.8 million (closer to 10.78) and the Xbox 360 also shipped 10.8 million: Also this is in Kotaku PS3 sales are down 9% for oct-dec so PS3 sales are not going foward but are going backwards. The thrill of the Playstation name is wearing off. Right so the first 8 months when the PS3 outsold the 360 this year had nothing to do with the playstation brand, it was because the prices of both consoles were similar. As soon as xbox cut their prices in September, they caught up in the 4 busiest months of the year, simple as that. It's all about price.Spin however you want.wow i was going to post that just a second ago. this is not good new for MS for being the cheaper console for 2 year PS3 being more expensive and in 08 holidays having the recession work against sony and still not being able to outsell the PS3
http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/ps3-and-360-sales-equal-in-2008-$1264624.htm
mmirza23
Fact is Last year PS3 sold more this year it did not.
Oct-Dec PS3 sold 9% less. P
S3 still after over 2 years is still in last place.
The PS3 is going backwards in sales. Compared to the 360.
Fact is PS3 is sucking wind this gen
Haha, so true.I just have to post Divinity's sig again, since it's so full of WIN:
"Did you ever see the movie Rocky? In the end, Rocky didn't win. What was his accomplishment? He went 10 rounds with the best. The movie wasn't celebrating mediocrity, it was celebrating excelling far beyond expectations. And now PS3, which had been deemed this generation's certain victor even before launch is in 3rd place, while the scrappy underdog has cemented a place in front of them. If PS3 was celebrating a small lead, it would be celebrating mediocrity. But for a player like MS, who had to split 30% marketshare with Nintendo last generation, it's a victory"Every bit of it is true. :)
EDIT: GlitchSpot strikes again :?
LosDaddie
[QUOTE="mmirza23"]And the 8 million deficit that MS claimed is actually more like 7.1 million 21.35-28.45Floppy_JimWhen Aaron Greenburg was talking about the 8 million lead, he must have got his information from VGChartz. hahaha, he must provide the numbers to them, just like Hirai probably sends them market share information :lol:
[QUOTE="rybe1025"][QUOTE="Ragashahs"]Wait what??? Only on system wars could someone be able to twist this into a good thing for Sony. First I doubt they have the true numbers cause kinda hard to have them. Lets say they do though. 1) Sony first year sold more then the 360 and now they sold slightly less. 2) PS2 sold over 100 million consoles more then the X-box and now not only is the PS3 still in last place but AGAIN sold slightly less. Reason I keep saying slightly less is cause The PlayStation 3 shipped around 10.8 million (closer to 10.78) and the Xbox 360 also shipped 10.8 million: Also this is in Kotaku PS3 sales are down 9% for oct-dec so PS3 sales are not going foward but are going backwards. The thrill of the Playstation name is wearing off. Right so the first 8 months when the PS3 outsold the 360 this year had nothing to do with the playstation brand, it was because the prices of both consoles were similar. As soon as xbox cut their prices in September, they caught up in the 4 busiest months of the year, simple as that. It's all about price.wow i was going to post that just a second ago. this is not good new for MS for being the cheaper console for 2 year PS3 being more expensive and in 08 holidays having the recession work against sony and still not being able to outsell the PS3
http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/ps3-and-360-sales-equal-in-2008-$1264624.htm
mmirza23
Sorry but the Playstation brand is the biggest and the only sonys weapon this gen! Thats the only excuse i see for a console with an inferior lineup and superior price sell almost as much as the competitor.
[QUOTE="mmirza23"][QUOTE="rybe1025"]Wait what??? Only on system wars could someone be able to twist this into a good thing for Sony. First I doubt they have the true numbers cause kinda hard to have them. Lets say they do though. 1) Sony first year sold more then the 360 and now they sold slightly less. 2) PS2 sold over 100 million consoles more then the X-box and now not only is the PS3 still in last place but AGAIN sold slightly less. Reason I keep saying slightly less is cause The PlayStation 3 shipped around 10.8 million (closer to 10.78) and the Xbox 360 also shipped 10.8 million: Also this is in Kotaku PS3 sales are down 9% for oct-dec so PS3 sales are not going foward but are going backwards. The thrill of the Playstation name is wearing off.rybe1025Right so the first 8 months when the PS3 outsold the 360 this year had nothing to do with the playstation brand, it was because the prices of both consoles were similar. As soon as xbox cut their prices in September, they caught up in the 4 busiest months of the year, simple as that. It's all about price.Spin however you want.
Fact is Last year PS3 sold more this year it did not.
Oct-Dec PS3 sold 9% less. P
S3 still after over 2 years is still in last place.
The PS3 is going backwards in sales. Compared to the 360.
Fact is PS3 is sucking wind this gen
Where was the 360 going in sales before this falls price drop? Exactly. The PS3 dropped it's price right before the holidays last year hence the increase in hardware, like I've said it's all about price. You just use straight up numbers without factoring in why it happened, there is no "spin" involved.
Good news for both companies. Anyway, those guys who thought that PS3/360 gap were beeing smaller and smaller were completly wrong :DPAL360And so are the guys that said it widened. Year lead!
Not To Surprised To Here That Considering PS3 Beat The 360 in a lot of the early months. Then the 360 dominated the PS3 in the holiday season sales wise. All Sony needs is a price drop in early 09 and i think sales will rise, plus Microsoft cannot lower the price of the 360 much more.rmerri52That depends on who's able to cut production costs even further and which company can absorb the hit, right now I think MS can cut the price again before Sony can.
[QUOTE="rybe1025"][QUOTE="mmirza23"] Right so the first 8 months when the PS3 outsold the 360 this year had nothing to do with the playstation brand, it was because the prices of both consoles were similar. As soon as xbox cut their prices in September, they caught up in the 4 busiest months of the year, simple as that. It's all about price.mmirza23Spin however you want.
Fact is Last year PS3 sold more this year it did not.
Oct-Dec PS3 sold 9% less. P
S3 still after over 2 years is still in last place.
The PS3 is going backwards in sales. Compared to the 360.
Fact is PS3 is sucking wind this gen
Where was the 360 going in sales before this falls price drop? Exactly. The PS3 dropped it's price right before the holidays last year hence the increase in hardware, like I've said it's all about price. You just use straight up numbers without factoring in why it happened, there is no "spin" involved.
No it is spin to try to come up with excuses why the PS3 did worse. You can scream this could have happened or that could have happened till your blue in the face but the end result is the same.....You have no idea. All the what if guessing is just that GUESSING. What we do know is the PS3 did not sell more.Since you are such a PS3 fan you should be more worried that the PS3 is now selling less and not even the same. 9% is a rather large drop for 4th quarter.(again I do not put a ton of faith in this article anyways. I am just saying if this is all true.)
Not To Surprised To Here That Considering PS3 Beat The 360 in a lot of the early months. Then the 360 dominated the PS3 in the holiday season sales wise. All Sony needs is a price drop in early 09 and i think sales will rise, plus Microsoft cannot lower the price of the 360 much more.rmerri52
MS can still cut the Xbox360's price.
Not To Surprised To Here That Considering PS3 Beat The 360 in a lot of the early months. Then the 360 dominated the PS3 in the holiday season sales wise. All Sony needs is a price drop in early 09 and i think sales will rise, plus Microsoft cannot lower the price of the 360 much more.rmerri52
Sony are loosing money and MS as making money with their systems actual price. What make you think that Sony can do a price drop and MS cant. Looks more like the oposite to me.
[QUOTE="mmirza23"][QUOTE="rybe1025"]Wait what??? Only on system wars could someone be able to twist this into a good thing for Sony. First I doubt they have the true numbers cause kinda hard to have them. Lets say they do though. 1) Sony first year sold more then the 360 and now they sold slightly less. 2) PS2 sold over 100 million consoles more then the X-box and now not only is the PS3 still in last place but AGAIN sold slightly less. Reason I keep saying slightly less is cause The PlayStation 3 shipped around 10.8 million (closer to 10.78) and the Xbox 360 also shipped 10.8 million: Also this is in Kotaku PS3 sales are down 9% for oct-dec so PS3 sales are not going foward but are going backwards. The thrill of the Playstation name is wearing off.PAL360Right so the first 8 months when the PS3 outsold the 360 this year had nothing to do with the playstation brand, it was because the prices of both consoles were similar. As soon as xbox cut their prices in September, they caught up in the 4 busiest months of the year, simple as that. It's all about price.
Sorry but the Playstation brand is the biggest and the only sonys weapon this gen! Thats the only excuse i see for a console with an inferior lineup and superior price sell almost as much as the competitor.
Wow, just wow. You can say that the PS brand sold the system for the first year or so. But to say that now when it has so much to offer is false.I can't say you did for sure, Pal360, but you seem to be the type of poster here that made fun of the PS3 as merely being a blu-ray player. That the brand name meant nothing when it came to games. Now you tell us that its the brand that is selling it. Well which is it? If you can't see how weak it is with all of the marketing, all of the fanboy hype, all of this (supposed) dev support and the 360 can't do much but maintain the year lead they got when they were all along in this race. Its weak.
[QUOTE="LosDaddie"]Haha, so true.I just have to post Divinity's sig again, since it's so full of WIN:
"Did you ever see the movie Rocky? In the end, Rocky didn't win. What was his accomplishment? He went 10 rounds with the best. The movie wasn't celebrating mediocrity, it was celebrating excelling far beyond expectations. And now PS3, which had been deemed this generation's certain victor even before launch is in 3rd place, while the scrappy underdog has cemented a place in front of them. If PS3 was celebrating a small lead, it would be celebrating mediocrity. But for a player like MS, who had to split 30% marketshare with Nintendo last generation, it's a victory"Every bit of it is true. :)
EDIT: GlitchSpot strikes again :?
Master-Thief-09
And watch cows ignore it.
They won't address the issue of MARKETSHARE, but rather instead focus on the Xbox360's one year headstart. :lol:
[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="mmirza23"] Right so the first 8 months when the PS3 outsold the 360 this year had nothing to do with the playstation brand, it was because the prices of both consoles were similar. As soon as xbox cut their prices in September, they caught up in the 4 busiest months of the year, simple as that. It's all about price.PoppaGamer
Sorry but the Playstation brand is the biggest and the only sonys weapon this gen! Thats the only excuse i see for a console with an inferior lineup and superior price sell almost as much as the competitor.
Wow, just wow. You can say that the PS brand sold the system for the first year or so. But to say that now when it has so much to offer is false.I can't say you did for sure, Pal360, but you seem to be the type of poster here that made fun of the PS3 as merely being a blu-ray player. That the brand name meant nothing when it came to games. Now you tell us that its the brand that is selling it. Well which is it? If you can't see how weak it is with all of the marketing, all of the fanboy hype, all of this (supposed) dev support and the 360 can't do much but maintain the year lead they got when they were all along in this race. Its weak.
Sony dominated the console market during the last 2 gens (15 years more or less). Do you think it only affected the first year of the PS3? Lots of ppl at leat here on Portugal dont know what a xbox or a 360 is. They think console = playstation! Other guys like me who play games since 80s and like to read games magazines and consult gaming site, know that PS3 is far from a success. It has its great games like LBP and Heavy Rain (to name some games i really want on PS3)but not as many as its competitors...
I just have to post Divinity's sig again, since it's so full of WIN:
"Did you ever see the movie Rocky? In the end, Rocky didn't win. What was his accomplishment? He went 10 rounds with the best. The movie wasn't celebrating mediocrity, it was celebrating excelling far beyond expectations. And now PS3, which had been deemed this generation's certain victor even before launch is in 3rd place, while the scrappy underdog has cemented a place in front of them. If PS3 was celebrating a small lead, it would be celebrating mediocrity. But for a player like MS, who had to split 30% marketshare with Nintendo last generation, it's a victory"Every bit of it is true. :)
EDIT: GlitchSpot strikes again :?
Haha, so true.And watch cows ignore it.
They won't address the issue of MARKETSHARE, but rather instead focus on the Xbox360's one year headstart. :lol:
I owned this dude on his sig yesterday. You must have missed it. Rocky was the underdog. Rocky loses. Telling us that Sony is the underdog is humorous at best. While the fight is/will be a good one, the champ will be the voctor. And the end of the sig says it all about 360-fanboys. "Market share." That's great for MS and all but how does that benefit gaming? What has MS brought as a console maker they couldn't have done in conjunctiuon with Sony or Nintendo to make their systems better? You can't possibly tell me that a Sony/MS branded console wouldn't be insane. Sony would have the brain power on the hardware and MS would take the OS and software part of it. Instead we're all about "teh market share." Excited to see a company who f-ed up last gen and cut out early and rushed into this gen with faulty hardware. How sad gaming will be if this mind-set wins over.I just have to post Divinity's sig again, since it's so full of WIN:
"Did you ever see the movie Rocky? In the end, Rocky didn't win. What was his accomplishment? He went 10 rounds with the best. The movie wasn't celebrating mediocrity, it was celebrating excelling far beyond expectations. And now PS3, which had been deemed this generation's certain victor even before launch is in 3rd place, while the scrappy underdog has cemented a place in front of them. If PS3 was celebrating a small lead, it would be celebrating mediocrity. But for a player like MS, who had to split 30% marketshare with Nintendo last generation, it's a victory"Every bit of it is true. :)
EDIT: GlitchSpot strikes again :?
Haha, so true.And watch cows ignore it.
They won't address the issue of MARKETSHARE, but rather instead focus on the Xbox360's one year headstart. :lol:
I'll be the first to admit that if the PS3 doesnt come in first that it's indeed a failure. No way they ever come up with the same market share as the last 2 gens. However the 360 1 year head start did help take some market share from Sony but the majority of the market share has been taken by the Wii.[QUOTE="Master-Thief-09"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"]Haha, so true.I just have to post Divinity's sig again, since it's so full of WIN:
"Did you ever see the movie Rocky? In the end, Rocky didn't win. What was his accomplishment? He went 10 rounds with the best. The movie wasn't celebrating mediocrity, it was celebrating excelling far beyond expectations. And now PS3, which had been deemed this generation's certain victor even before launch is in 3rd place, while the scrappy underdog has cemented a place in front of them. If PS3 was celebrating a small lead, it would be celebrating mediocrity. But for a player like MS, who had to split 30% marketshare with Nintendo last generation, it's a victory"Every bit of it is true. :)
EDIT: GlitchSpot strikes again :?
LosDaddie
And watch cows ignore it.
They won't address the issue of MARKETSHARE, but rather instead focus on the Xbox360's one year headstart. :lol:
:lol: We need this quoted some more. Spin it all you like, make out like it's good all you like. Reality is you sony fans where so sure this gen was in the bag, so positive that you'd be having awesome games, sell tons, get all the best exclusives. What a kick in the teeth this gen must be. :lol: The mighty 120million+ giant that is the playstation crushed and reduced to matching a console that sold 25million last gen. :lol:[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="Master-Thief-09"] Haha, so true.CreepyBacon
And watch cows ignore it.
They won't address the issue of MARKETSHARE, but rather instead focus on the Xbox360's one year headstart. :lol:
:lol: We need this quoted some more. Spin it all you like, make out like it's good all you like. Reality is you sony fans where so sure this gen was in the bag, so positive that you'd be having awesome games, sell tons, get all the best exclusives. What a kick in the teeth this gen must be. :lol: The mighty 120million+ giant that is the playstation crushed and reduced to matching a console that sold 25million last gen. :lol:It's like going 18-0, then losing the superbowl haha plus it's more like 140 million now as of july 2008
[QUOTE="mmirza23"][QUOTE="rybe1025"]Wait what??? Only on system wars could someone be able to twist this into a good thing for Sony. First I doubt they have the true numbers cause kinda hard to have them. Lets say they do though. 1) Sony first year sold more then the 360 and now they sold slightly less. 2) PS2 sold over 100 million consoles more then the X-box and now not only is the PS3 still in last place but AGAIN sold slightly less. Reason I keep saying slightly less is cause The PlayStation 3 shipped around 10.8 million (closer to 10.78) and the Xbox 360 also shipped 10.8 million: Also this is in Kotaku PS3 sales are down 9% for oct-dec so PS3 sales are not going foward but are going backwards. The thrill of the Playstation name is wearing off.rybe1025Right so the first 8 months when the PS3 outsold the 360 this year had nothing to do with the playstation brand, it was because the prices of both consoles were similar. As soon as xbox cut their prices in September, they caught up in the 4 busiest months of the year, simple as that. It's all about price.Spin however you want.
Fact is Last year PS3 sold more this year it did not.
Oct-Dec PS3 sold 9% less. P
S3 still after over 2 years is still in last place.
The PS3 is going backwards in sales. Compared to the 360.
Fact is PS3 is sucking wind this gen
this is the dumbest thing ive read on this forum. if the ps3 is sucking wind the the 360 is too, i mean even with a price cut it managed to barely beat the ps3 in sales. the FACT of the matter is even in a recession & the price of the ps3 its still selling very well so when the price cut comes this year its trouble for microsoft.
[QUOTE="Ragashahs"]wow i was going to post that just a second ago. this is not good new for MS for being the cheaper console for 2 year PS3 being more expensive and in 08 holidays having the recession work against sony and still not being able to outsell the PS3
http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/ps3-and-360-sales-equal-in-2008-$1264624.htm
PAL360
really?
So you think that a MS system selling as much as a Sony system is no good news for MS??? Im sure that the fact PS3 is not selling 3 times more than the 360 is really bad news for sony :P
considering you can get a 360 for half the price of a ps3 ya its pretty good news for sony and bad for MS
[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="Master-Thief-09"] Haha, so true.PoppaGamer
And watch cows ignore it.
They won't address the issue of MARKETSHARE, but rather instead focus on the Xbox360's one year headstart. :lol:
I owned this dude on his sig yesterday. You must have missed it. Rocky was the underdog. Rocky loses. Telling us that Sony is the underdog is humorous at best. While the fight is/will be a good one, the champ will be the voctor. And the end of the sig says it all about 360-fanboys. "Market share." That's great for MS and all but how does that benefit gaming?I was in that thread and you didn't own anyone. :lol:
How does marketshare affect gaming on the Xbox360? GTA IV (on launch day), FFXIII, DMC4, VF5, Tekken6 and RE5 all say HELLO to you. Yes, marketshare is the sole reason why those games are now appearing on the Xbox Brand this gen.
Funny thing is; All of that would be obvious to if you didn't worship Sony :)
What has MS brought as a console maker they couldn't have done in conjunctiuon with Sony or Nintendo to make their systems better? You can't possibly tell me that a Sony/MS branded console wouldn't be insane. Sony would have the brain power on the hardware and MS would take the OS and software part of it. Instead we're all about "teh market share." Excited to see a company who f-ed up last gen and cut out early and rushed into this gen with faulty hardware. How sad gaming will be if this mind-set wins over.PoppaGamer
Since I own both consoles and play my Xbox360 far more than my PS3; I'd say MS has brought a lot to the console industry.
But yeah, a Sony&MS console would freakin' rock. But that's not reality.
[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="Master-Thief-09"] Haha, so true.mmirza23
And watch cows ignore it.
They won't address the issue of MARKETSHARE, but rather instead focus on the Xbox360's one year headstart. :lol:
I'll be the first to admit that if the PS3 doesnt come in first that it's indeed a failure. No way they ever come up with the same market share as the last 2 gens. However the 360 1 year head start did help take some market share from Sony but the majority of the market share has been taken by the Wii.To be fair, a dip in Sony's marketshare was expected this gen.
However, Sony/PS3 will be lucky to retain 50% of the marketshare the PS2 held last gen. That is too much of a dip.
[QUOTE="rybe1025"][QUOTE="mmirza23"] Right so the first 8 months when the PS3 outsold the 360 this year had nothing to do with the playstation brand, it was because the prices of both consoles were similar. As soon as xbox cut their prices in September, they caught up in the 4 busiest months of the year, simple as that. It's all about price.patrickjw333Spin however you want.
Fact is Last year PS3 sold more this year it did not.
Oct-Dec PS3 sold 9% less. P
S3 still after over 2 years is still in last place.
The PS3 is going backwards in sales. Compared to the 360.
Fact is PS3 is sucking wind this gen
this is the dumbest thing ive read on this forum. if the ps3 is sucking wind the the 360 is too, i mean even with a price cut it managed to barely beat the ps3 in sales. the FACT of the matter is even in a recession & the price of the ps3 its still selling very well so when the price cut comes this year its trouble for microsoft.
At first I was going to respond till I saw the last part. I can not even take the PS3 people serious anymore when they throw in the JUST WAIT and the 360 is in trouble anymore. Ya ya ya we heard it all before MANY times.I know when this happens..PS3 launches the 360 is done
when the European launch happens the 360 is done.
when Heavenly Sword and Uncharted come out the 360 is done.
when the new sku comes out the 360 is done.
when MGS4 comes out the 360 is done
when LBP comes out the 360 is done.
when home comes out the 360 is dead
and now some price cut that has not been confirmed and also you have no date for...the 360 is dead.
Heck I have see many PS3 fans even say firmware updates would kill the 360
How about this at least get a date or Sony confirming a price cut at least. Sound good? Considering Sony is the only one of the 3 consoles posting a money lose then I would not be so eager to jump on the price cut bandwagen.
So now lemmings are all saying that the PS3 only matching the 360 sucks?
Uhmmm....what happened to all those threads and MS PR spin about how MS is INCREASING THEIR LEAD? What happened to that? Lemmings were all over that MS spin, calling it fact and decrying the death of the PS3. I seem to recall one enlightened soul arguing that MS wasn't increasing their lead if you look at the actual numbers, but lemmings endlessly attacked that person despite his being unbelievably right.
Now who was that person again? Hmmmm. Might be time to bump that thread. Maybe one day lemmings will learn that MS is just as guily as spin as Sony and stop acting like every word Sony says is a lie while every word MS says is the word of God.
[QUOTE="rmerri52"]Not To Surprised To Here That Considering PS3 Beat The 360 in a lot of the early months. Then the 360 dominated the PS3 in the holiday season sales wise. All Sony needs is a price drop in early 09 and i think sales will rise, plus Microsoft cannot lower the price of the 360 much more.PAL360
Sony are loosing money and MS as making money with their systems actual price. What make you think that Sony can do a price drop and MS cant. Looks more like the oposite to me.
Well, to be perfectly honest, we know MS was making money BEFORE they dropped the price. There is no proof that they are making money on every 360 sold now that the price is dropped. They MAY be...but we don't know that just yet.
And watch cows ignore it.
They won't address the issue of MARKETSHARE, but rather instead focus on the Xbox360's one year headstart. :lol:
I'll be the first to admit that if the PS3 doesnt come in first that it's indeed a failure. No way they ever come up with the same market share as the last 2 gens. However the 360 1 year head start did help take some market share from Sony but the majority of the market share has been taken by the Wii.To be fair, a dip in Sony's marketshare was expected this gen.
However, Sony/PS3 will be lucky to retain 50% of the marketshare the PS2 held last gen. That is too much of a dip.
Agreed aka failure. I'll still enjoy the console as many others will but it will be a failure from a business perspective unless Sony's plan was a blu ray trojan and Blu Ray starts to dominate.[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="Master-Thief-09"] Haha, so true.CreepyBacon
And watch cows ignore it.
They won't address the issue of MARKETSHARE, but rather instead focus on the Xbox360's one year headstart. :lol:
:lol: We need this quoted some more. Spin it all you like, make out like it's good all you like. Reality is you sony fans where so sure this gen was in the bag, so positive that you'd be having awesome games, sell tons, get all the best exclusives. What a kick in the teeth this gen must be. :lol: The mighty 120million+ giant that is the playstation crushed and reduced to matching a console that sold 25million last gen. :lol:Yup, that quote is so FULL of WIN that we should probably save it.
It does need to quoted some more.
Not To Surprised To Here That Considering PS3 Beat The 360 in a lot of the early months. Then the 360 dominated the PS3 in the holiday season sales wise. All Sony needs is a price drop in early 09 and i think sales will rise, plus Microsoft cannot lower the price of the 360 much more.rmerri52So MS is making money on every console sold and Sony is losing money on every console sold but Sony are in a better place to cut the price? :? *scratches head* can you explain that to me exactly?
[QUOTE="patrickjw333"][QUOTE="rybe1025"]Spin however you want.Fact is Last year PS3 sold more this year it did not.
Oct-Dec PS3 sold 9% less. P
S3 still after over 2 years is still in last place.
The PS3 is going backwards in sales. Compared to the 360.
Fact is PS3 is sucking wind this gen
rybe1025
this is the dumbest thing ive read on this forum. if the ps3 is sucking wind the the 360 is too, i mean even with a price cut it managed to barely beat the ps3 in sales. the FACT of the matter is even in a recession & the price of the ps3 its still selling very well so when the price cut comes this year its trouble for microsoft.
At first I was going to respond till I saw the last part. I can not even take the PS3 people serious anymore when they throw in the JUST WAIT and the 360 is in trouble anymore. Ya ya ya we heard it all before MANY times.I know when this happens..PS3 launches the 360 is done
when the European launch happens the 360 is done.
when Heavenly Sword and Uncharted come out the 360 is done.
when the new sku comes out the 360 is done.
when MGS4 comes out the 360 is done
when LBP comes out the 360 is done.
when home comes out the 360 is dead
and now some price cut that has not been confirmed and also you have no date for...the 360 is dead.
Heck I have see many PS3 fans even say firmware updates would kill the 360
How about this at least get a date or Sony confirming a price cut at least. Sound good? Considering Sony is the only one of the 3 consoles posting a money lose then I would not be so eager to jump on the price cut bandwagen.
nooo...you are destroying the PS3 fanboys dream!
Anyway you are completly right. Im sure this gen of cows will be imortalised as the most contradicting gamers ever...
[QUOTE="PoppaGamer"] [QUOTE="LosDaddie"] I owned this dude on his sig yesterday. You must have missed it. Rocky was the underdog. Rocky loses. Telling us that Sony is the underdog is humorous at best. While the fight is/will be a good one, the champ will be the voctor. And the end of the sig says it all about 360-fanboys. "Market share." That's great for MS and all but how does that benefit gaming? LosDaddie
I was in that thread and you didn't own anyone. :lol:
How does marketshare affect gaming on the Xbox360? GTA IV (on launch day), FFXIII, DMC4, VF5, Tekken6 and RE5 all say HELLO to you. Yes, marketshare is the sole reason why those games are now appearing on the Xbox Brand this gen.
Funny thing is; All of that would be obvious to if you didn't worship Sony :)
What has MS brought as a console maker they couldn't have done in conjunctiuon with Sony or Nintendo to make their systems better? You can't possibly tell me that a Sony/MS branded console wouldn't be insane. Sony would have the brain power on the hardware and MS would take the OS and software part of it. Instead we're all about "teh market share." Excited to see a company who f-ed up last gen and cut out early and rushed into this gen with faulty hardware. How sad gaming will be if this mind-set wins over.PoppaGamer
Since I own both consoles and play my Xbox360 far more than my PS3; I'd say MS has brought a lot to the console industry.
But yeah, a Sony&MS console would freakin' rock. But that's not reality.
Again you point to software. a company thats good with software should stick to it. This has been obvious from last gen to this one. And I asked you how does it benefit gaming overall, not how does it benefit the 360. HUGE difference. And because so many games are now multiplat, you think that's a good thing? :lol: Yeah, i love how multiplats don't maximize any systems features. Tell me those same games wouldn't be better as exclusives. No, a Sony/MS system is not reality. But it would sure have benefitted us all as gamers a lot more than the split we have now. Sony and Nintendo have had such a large market share (PS2 and Wii) that it has grown/is growing the gaming community. How has MS done that? Al they've done is take a chunk. They haven't expanded it at all. But we should priase them, right. It all comes down to people being Sony haters. Not about what benefits us all as gamers the most.And what happenned to all the PS3 will catch the 360 by the end of 08 claims? :P If someone was being particularly pedantic they might point to the figures saying Sony shipped 10.78 and MS shipped 10.8 lol (the figures used in the link) and so it is actually a slight increase! It is certainly not the dramatic cut in the 360's lead over the PS3 that was being predicted in 07 and even up until November of last year by cows.So now lemmings are all saying that the PS3 only matching the 360 sucks?
Uhmmm....what happened to all those threads and MS PR spin about how MS is INCREASING THEIR LEAD? What happened to that? Lemmings were all over that MS spin, calling it fact and decrying the death of the PS3. I seem to recall one enlightened soul arguing that MS wasn't increasing their lead if you look at the actual numbers, but lemmings endlessly attacked that person despite his being unbelievably right.
Now who was that person again? Hmmmm. Might be time to bump that thread. Maybe one day lemmings will learn that MS is just as guily as spin as Sony and stop acting like every word Sony says is a lie while every word MS says is the word of God.
ZIMdoom
Is this true? Is the source credible? If so lemmings just got majorly owned. They had me convinced that the 360 had outsold the PS3 by like 8 million and now this comes in and they tied? Even with a 200/300$ price diference! LOL Sony will pass MS I'm sure of it.Eddie-VedderThats exactly why I say that PS3 is the cost for cost king. When in the same price range the ps3 was killing MS WW for like 6 or 7 months until the 360 price cut and when ps3 has another price cut down to 299 ps3 is gonna start selling again. and the only price cut you might see from 360 is from the elite model. they definitely aint dropping the arcade down again.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment