Playstation Plus F**king ****

F**king seriously? European subscribers are getting Bulletstorm and RE5, and we get a bunch of sh**ty games no one cares about. SCEA is obviously run by a bunch of mentally ill chimpanzees.

megadeth1117

[QUOTE="megadeth1117"]

F**king seriously? European subscribers are getting Bulletstorm and RE5, and we get a bunch of sh**ty games no one cares about. SCEA is obviously run by a bunch of mentally ill chimpanzees.

jsmoke03

SCEA should be giving away full retail games, just like SCEE does. There's no excuse.

[QUOTE="jsmoke03"][QUOTE="megadeth1117"]

F**king seriously? European subscribers are getting Bulletstorm and RE5, and we get a bunch of sh**ty games no one cares about. SCEA is obviously run by a bunch of mentally ill chimpanzees.

megadeth1117

SCEA should be giving away full retail games, just like SCEE does. There's no excuse.

[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] There's LB2 and Infamous 2 in PSN+...JohnnyCageMK

of course PSN+ is king, after all... it's the best network in the world:cool:

Some NFL game, SCEA knows NA fans will be pleased by this. LOL!SaltyMeatballs

omfg who scored that goal in your sig?!?

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]Some NFL game, SCEA knows NA fans will be pleased by this. LOL!Obviously_Right

omfg who scored that goal in your sig?!?

[QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"][QUOTE="Bigboi500"]That was freaking months ago. When I first signed up for PS+ they offered great games every week, now we're lucky if we get one or two crap download games a month. Blazerdt47

yeah PS+ US has always been lamer then PS+jpn and europe.

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]Some NFL game, SCEA knows NA fans will be pleased by this. LOL!SaltyMeatballs

omfg who scored that goal in your sig?!?

Meh. I have found no reasons to pay for a PSN plus subscription because the "free" game selection hasn't been so great so I don't see the price being justified over the course of the subscription.

The_Game21x

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Meh. I have found no reasons to pay for a PSN plus subscription because the "free" game selection hasn't been so great so I don't see the price being justified over the course of the subscription.

kuraimen

:roll:

I find value in Live. I do not in PSN. Not a difficult concept to understand.

[QUOTE="megadeth1117"]

SCEA should be giving away full retail games, just like SCEE does. There's no excuse.

Slashkice

I'm confused...can you not see King of Fighters XIII in the top picture, or are you just ignoring it? It's a newer retail title than both Resident Evil 5 and Bulletstorm, and it's of a higher quality.

Now, that's funny.

I guess it comes down to the individual. I'm not a + member, but most of my PS3 gaming friends are most of them are beyond satisfied with the investment.

Its a completely optional service and if you enjoy even half of the content they offer then you're getting a great deal. This isnt like Live were you must pay if you want to enjoy a standard portion of the game you already purchased.

If you didnt research before making the jump then its your own fault.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Meh. I have found no reasons to pay for a PSN plus subscription because the "free" game selection hasn't been so great so I don't see the price being justified over the course of the subscription.

The_Game21x

:roll:

I find value in Live. I do not in PSN. Not a difficult concept to understand.

If you had to pay to play your PS3 games online I suppose you'd find value in PSN?

Not a troll post, just wondering.

F**king seriously? European subscribers are getting Bulletstorm and RE5, and we get a bunch of sh**ty games no one cares about. SCEA is obviously run by a bunch of mentally ill chimpanzees.megadeth1117

If you didnt research before making the jump then its your own fault.sandbox3d

Yeah, you're right. I should have just used my time machine to find out what games would've be offered, then decide if it was worth it. Unfortunately, I lent mine to Nic Cage, can I use yours?

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] So you rather pay extra and get no more games whatsoever like with Live? lolsandbox3d

:roll:

I find value in Live. I do not in PSN. Not a difficult concept to understand.

If you had to pay to play your PS3 games online I suppose you'd find value in PSN?

Not a troll post, just wondering.

Most of my friends game on the 360. I pay for Live to play with them. I rarely game online on my PS3 because most of my friends are multi console owners and choose to game on the 360 so no, I probably wouldn't pay for PSN Plus even if it was required for online play.

I have KOF XIII already but man seems like a ripoff don't know what SCEA was thinking.

[QUOTE="sandbox3d"]If you didnt research before making the jump then its your own fault.megadeth1117

Yeah, you're right. I should have just used my time machine to find out what games would've be offered, then decide if it was worth it. Unfortunately, I lent mine to Nic Cage, can I use yours?

So you just paid for a service up front without knowing if you'd get something worth while. Yep, that's your fault buddy.

Everyone I know that got Plus, got it because they already saw content that interested them. They already knew they were making a worth-wile investment initially.

Of course we cant tell what will be offered in the future, but if you didnt see something that justified your spending from the start then it would seem that you burned yourself.

alex kidd in miracle world rulz , i bouught it and im not ps+ member :D

I don't know why you're complaining. The Revenge of Shinobi curb stomps all the other games you mentioned.

Playstation Plus: The only concept where you pay to get free stuff.

RyanShazam

I find both services a bit silly, I get that companies need money, but I don't see the point in either Xbox Live or PS+.

XBL is basically on disk DLC, you pay for your internet, you pay Microsoft to use your internet with games.

PS+, is-- I don't know what it does honestly-- "free" games? Isn't that only this year, and only if you stay subscribed... you'll probably end up having less money than you would have if you just bought the games on their own, and they wouldn't be tied to a subscription or the internet.

PSN is getting Alex Kidd in Miracle World?! Hell ****ing yes! Please be on Vita. And please come to Europe.

[QUOTE="RyanShazam"]

Playstation Plus: The only concept where you pay to get free stuff.

TilxWLOC

PS+, is-- I don't know what it does honestly-- "free" games? Isn't that only this year, and only if you stay subscribed... you'll probably end up having less money than you would have if you just bought the games on their own, and they wouldn't be tied to a subscription or the internet.

PSN is getting Alex Kidd in Miracle World?! Hell ****ing yes! Please be on Vita. And please come to Europe.

burgeg

[QUOTE="megadeth1117"]

[QUOTE="sandbox3d"]If you didnt research before making the jump then its your own fault.sandbox3d

Yeah, you're right. I should have just used my time machine to find out what games would've be offered, then decide if it was worth it. Unfortunately, I lent mine to Nic Cage, can I use yours?

So you just paid for a service up front without knowing if you'd get something worth while. Yep, that's your fault buddy.

Everyone I know that got Plus, got it because they already saw content that interested them. They already knew they were making a worth-wile investment initially.

Of course we cant tell what will be offered in the future, but if you didnt see something that justified your spending from the start then it would seem that you burned yourself.

[QUOTE="burgeg"]

PSN is getting Alex Kidd in Miracle World?! Hell ****ing yes! Please be on Vita. And please come to Europe.

AmnesiaHaze

[QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"]

[QUOTE="burgeg"]

PSN is getting Alex Kidd in Miracle World?! Hell ****ing yes! Please be on Vita. And please come to Europe.

burgeg

I don't see the savings from this service, unless you buy loads of content it might be worth it, I'd spend less than the 60 there asking for every year

I'd rather just spend that 60 on the games I want

I'd rather just spend that 60 on the game I wantSupabul

foreigners are the biggest cows so its no surprise they're gonna get better gamesmems_1224

It still doesnt make up for how many times all the gaming companies in the world have screwed us EUs over. Stop whinning, we get it much much worse 90% of the time.

Even if PS+ is a joke... i don't see why getting "free" the best fighter this gen would be a bad thing :?

PS+ is cool . It allows you to rent games out for quite awhile, see if you like them, and uninstall them if you don't. You can complete trophy sets while doing so too, so that's good as well.

It could use a larger variety of games, but the ability to play LBP2 , RDR, Infamous 2 and etc. for more than an hour (heck, even a month) is a great deal.

I know I sound like a obnoxious advertisement, but it's in my nature.

I've been quite happy with the games that PS+ offers subscribers. Not all are great, but we just got Borderlands recently, so you can't say they're offering all mediocre titles.

KOFXIII is worth it.

So is Revenge of Shinobi.

I don't see the savings from this service, unless you buy loads of content it might be worth it, I'd spend less than the 60 there asking for every year

I'd rather just spend that 60 on the games I want

Supabul

The service gives you discounts on games and you get to play games for free for a week. So it works as a rental + discounts so it's pretty good if you like to play games it's pretty great. Though not everyone has the time to play everything so... oh well.

I need an urgent reply.

Is PSN+ already updated as of today? Or can I get in now and start downloading last month's stuff?

I've been looking for an opportune time to sign up to PS+ for "instant PS3 library."