dat gaemz gernilysm
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="LordOfPoms"][QUOTE="redskins26rocs"]GTA is the story of the underbelly of American life, so it's not supposed to be glamorous, but GTA certainly does objectify women and it's rare they're anything but hookers or sex objects for the male characters. That doesn't mean the game isn't right in showing that seedy side of life (after all, this isn't Grand Theft Church Goer), but my point is that in Dragon's Crown the Amazon is a strong character who you can play and has a particular art style associated to her on purpose to make her unique. In GTA, most of the women just ask if you want to get lucky and get in your car to have "sex" and give you life or their only role in the plot is to be a hooker or one of Anita's Damsels in Distress. Yet no reviewer will dare touch RockStar for this, but they teed off on Vanillaware. So what are you implying if Dragon Crown is not discrimating towards women because that is the style of the game therefore it should be forgiven or ignored, yet GTA is the style game where it kind of a thug life story with power, wealth, and sex kind of like some movies yet it should be deducted from its score I think we are kind of misunderstanding each other, do you think I am okay with Dragons Crown getting a poor score for such a stupid reason? I think we are misunderstanding each other, so I apologize. My thing is that Dragon's Crown got taken to the wood shed over an art style, but GTA would never get this sort of praise despite being even worse than DC is in terms or portrayal of women. I'm just pointing out the inconsistency, but we agree!
I agree since Dragons Crown does not have hookers, but in GTAIV which you are mostly referring to they dont really objectify women ( other than the hookers), even Romans girlfriend seemed to have standards and was not really a sex object, even Michelle was  [spoiler] an undercover cop which is kind of far from downplaying women since it is considered a respectful profession at least compared to any men main characters in the game. [/spoiler] ALso has GTA ever had a main character that has not been a criminal or back stabber ( like GTA SA for example). The series is kind of about the criminal life not giving money to charityredskins26rocs
I agree that objectification of women is bad and should end, but at the same time, if the game is actually good, give it a good score. Â The change should come from gamers not buying games that portray women as Dragon's Crown does, not from game companies giving the games low scores, manipulating consumers into believing the game is poorly made.
Good you can tell him the site he works for is the BIGGEST PILE OF DOG CRAP TO EVER GRACE THE INTERNET!!!Didn't know that me old mate Drasonak got a job there.Â
psymon100
Â
These poly fools where the hell did they come from? I didn't even know about this crap site since this year... I know the one guy there has a very strong bias slant and even admited it. We don't need people like this in game jounralism.
Â
AND STOP WITH THE BS "OBJECTIFYING WOMEN" crap... its fantasy art and rated mature. Let me guess this doush is ok with pron right? He should protesting that if it was the case, not games... so GTFO!
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]This is what happens when you let people like Anita live.BPoole96
Are you proposing that we no longer allow Anita Sarkesian to live?
That should be put into action immediately.Polygon is pretty shitty but so is this game. I don't care about the boobage (typical Japanese crap pandering to horny men) so I agree docking a game for something like that is dumb. Dragon's Crown isn't the only game to "objectify women;" it's pretty much industry standard. princeofshapeirHave you played it? No then gtfo! This game harkens back to the Advanced Dungeons and Dragons Arcade games only with way more RPG elements, longer levels and way more loot. This (outside of last of us and GTA5) has been my most wanted game this year!
This is why opinions vary. The reviewer has the right to speak her mind, but it shouldn't become personal. She sounds like she's a very insecure female who doesn't have any self esteem. If this was reviewed by a male gamer (who it's probably aimed at), I'm sure it would have gotten at least an 8 or better from Polygon. I've seem similar things like this happen on Gamespot as well. This is why I don't take their reviews seriously. The game is obviously very good and gamers should just judge it for themselves. blackaceIt depends... if it was a xbox exclusive, and reviewed by a male on their site, I am sure it would get great reviews....
HE mad its a playstation exclusive... only reason any fool would side with that crap site... and its mems.... hating on a PS game...business as usual.Im all for objectifying women but this just looks stupid :PÂ
All of the character models in that game just look flat out dumb from what I've seen.Â
Â
Â
A 6.5 isn't a bad score so Im not sure why you're complaining anyways. Its just one person's opinionÂ
mems_1224
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]This is what happens when you let people like Anita live.BPoole96
Are you proposing that we no longer allow Anita Sarkesian to live?
:lol:
I believe she currently has a flash game out that involves smashing her face in.
I'm looking forward to the Bayonetta 2 reads. Either because the excellent gameplay from the original will be overlooked(say whatever you want, but there are not that many games that play as well as Bayonetta does) for some nonsense about being politically correct in a game that doesn't take its own narrative seriously. Or...the part where the full on ignore it. Because...you can't slam one game, and then not bitch about it with another game that runs that line into shameless territory. jg4xchampAgreed. And their review of GTA V where they won't mention killing prostitutes. Very consistent Arthur.
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]This is what happens when you let people like Anita live.BPoole96
Are you proposing that we no longer allow Anita Sarkesian to live?
This aspect of this I don't like. It's not that I agree with, it's not that I don't think her arguments don't have their flaws, but it is not a bad thing for this industry to actually talk about the shit she brings up.[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]I'm looking forward to the Bayonetta 2 reads. Either because the excellent gameplay from the original will be overlooked(say whatever you want, but there are not that many games that play as well as Bayonetta does) for some nonsense about being politically correct in a game that doesn't take its own narrative seriously. Or...the part where the full on ignore it. Because...you can't slam one game, and then not bitch about it with another game that runs that line into shameless territory. DarkStraberryAgreed. And their review of GTA V where they won't mention killing prostitutes. Very consistent Arthur. If Vanillaware had the same kind of clout and $$$ that Rockstar has, the feminist reviewers would keep their mouths' shut and be good little worker ants and do as they were told.
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]I'm looking forward to the Bayonetta 2 reads. Either because the excellent gameplay from the original will be overlooked(say whatever you want, but there are not that many games that play as well as Bayonetta does) for some nonsense about being politically correct in a game that doesn't take its own narrative seriously. Or...the part where the full on ignore it. Because...you can't slam one game, and then not bitch about it with another game that runs that line into shameless territory. DarkStraberryAgreed. And their review of GTA V where they won't mention killing prostitutes. Very consistent Arthur. If Vanillaware had the same kind of clout and $$$ that Rockstar has, the feminist reviewers would keep their mouths' shut and be good little worker ants and do as they were told.
Actually, I think Polygon is biased against Sony and they took the opportunity to give a Sony (Vita and PS3) exclusive a bad score. Could be just me, but read Arthur Gies twitter account and you will understand...
where the f*ck are the women game designers? There is no way in 2013 we have had the audience expanded as much as we have, and the only women game design that I can think of off the top of my head is Amy Henning from naughty dog.jg4xchampJade Raymond
[QUOTE="BPoole96"]
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]This is what happens when you let people like Anita live.jg4xchamp
Are you proposing that we no longer allow Anita Sarkesian to live?
This aspect of this I don't like. It's not that I agree with, it's not that I don't think her arguments don't have their flaws, but it is not a bad thing for this industry to actually talk about the shit she brings up.This video pretty much sums up what you said
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] where the f*ck are the women game designers? There is no way in 2013 we have had the audience expanded as much as we have, and the only women game design that I can think of off the top of my head is Amy Henning from naughty dog.AcidSoldnerJade Raymond
[QUOTE="mems_1224"]HE mad its a playstation exclusive... only reason any fool would side with that crap site... and its mems.... hating on a PS game...business as usual. I didnt even know it was a PS3 exclusive. In fact, I didnt know shit about this game before today. Try harder stupid.Im all for objectifying women but this just looks stupid :PÂ
All of the character models in that game just look flat out dumb from what I've seen.Â
Â
Â
A 6.5 isn't a bad score so Im not sure why you're complaining anyways. Its just one person's opinionÂ
Midnightshade29
Jade Raymond[QUOTE="AcidSoldner"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] where the f*ck are the women game designers? There is no way in 2013 we have had the audience expanded as much as we have, and the only women game design that I can think of off the top of my head is Amy Henning from naughty dog.Bigboi500
[QUOTE="Midnightshade29"][QUOTE="mems_1224"]HE mad its a playstation exclusive... only reason any fool would side with that crap site... and its mems.... hating on a PS game...business as usual. I didnt even know it was a PS3 exclusive. In fact, I didnt know shit about this game before today. Try harder stupid. Y u so mad though?Im all for objectifying women but this just looks stupid :PÂ
All of the character models in that game just look flat out dumb from what I've seen.Â
Â
Â
A 6.5 isn't a bad score so Im not sure why you're complaining anyways. Its just one person's opinionÂ
mems_1224
Good you can tell him the site he works for is the BIGGEST PILE OF DOG CRAP TO EVER GRACE THE INTERNET!!![QUOTE="psymon100"]
Didn't know that me old mate Drasonak got a job there.Â
Midnightshade29
Â
These poly fools where the hell did they come from? I didn't even know about this crap site since this year... I know the one guy there has a very strong bias slant and even admited it. We don't need people like this in game jounralism.
Â
AND STOP WITH THE BS "OBJECTIFYING WOMEN" crap... its fantasy art and rated mature. Let me guess this doush is ok with pron right? He should protesting that if it was the case, not games... so GTFO!
Hello.Â
I'd just like to state that I don't share all of Drasonak's views, I actually wonder if he plays an exaggurated version of himself online. My views are those of equality, eg men and women could choose to view or not view porn, or be porn stars, or run for Mister/Ms Prime Minister etc.Â
Also, Drasonak didn't reply to an email I wrote him a while back. I guess this means he would like it if I died promptly. So I'm unable to pass on your kind words, my most sincere apologies old chummy mcfunny.Â
This aspect of this I don't like. It's not that I agree with, it's not that I don't think her arguments don't have their flaws, but it is not a bad thing for this industry to actually talk about the shit she brings up.[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]
[QUOTE="BPoole96"]
Are you proposing that we no longer allow Anita Sarkesian to live?
BPoole96
This video pretty much sums up what you said
I agree to an extent with him. I do not think however his excuse is justification for so many f*cking game developers having shitty protrayels of women. But then again al ot of them just suck dick as story tellers in general so it's not just women they f*ck up ;Pmost of them are hypocrite bigots. they feel their moral and preference are superior. they always feel like they are victims. the truth is they just discriminate other minorities whose preference is not of their taste. they discriminate sexy women who are proud of their bodies. they discriminate women who prefer being a reserved housewives and submissive. they discriminate women that are involve in adult industries. any reference to this group is a blatant insult to their sensibilities.Waiting for feminist game designers to make thier own games instead of demanding others to change.
EvanTheGamer
[QUOTE="EvanTheGamer"]Waiting for feminist game designers to make thier own games instead of demanding others to change.
strawhatlupi
most of them are hypocrite bigots.
they feel their moral and preference are superior. they always feel like they are victims.
the truth is they just discriminate other minorities whose preference is not of their taste.
they discriminate sexy women who are proud of their bodies.
they discriminate women who prefer being a reserved housewives and submissive.
they discriminate women that are involve in adult industries.
any reference to this group is a blatant insult to their sensibilities.
They are more filled with double standards than anything.
There was a debate video on Youtube with a gamer and a "Feminist lady" , the gamer was mad that Sexy women that weren't gamers were promoting games on you-tube but were all fakes and didn't know crap about it.
The woman went on to say that was ok, they can dress like that for views, and the gamer called them in relation to whores.. The feminist went on to say, "there not whores , they are sex workers" throughout the whole video, and even went on to say its a legitimate profession for females.... in the same sense as a doctor /facepalm.
"Its ok for a woman to flash and promote her body for money, but if a guy objectifies them online or in public it's wrong...."...so much wrong from some of them..
[QUOTE="BPoole96"]
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]This is what happens when you let people like Anita live.jg4xchamp
Are you proposing that we no longer allow Anita Sarkesian to live?
This aspect of this I don't like. It's not that I agree with, it's not that I don't think her arguments don't have their flaws, but it is not a bad thing for this industry to actually talk about the shit she brings up.This.
Though I can think of a few more female game designers than just Amy Henning. Still, the point stands. These sorts of things should be discussed, and not just when a game that offends everyone's sensibilities comes out.
I want a valid reason how objectifying a women could lead to problems.
Maybe if you are an insecure girl, but that's your problem!
You could say that this is the witch with Big Pecks ;)Oh this is the one with t!t witch. :lol:
Big_Pecks
Edit: Just found out it was a female reviewer
This is why we can't have nice things..... Sorry that video game characters get women jealous about them, she must have mental issues back in high school.
Is she an actual game designer, or just a PR person? Yeah with no real disrespect towards Raymond(if she's legit a designer, f*cking kudos to her) I always get the sense that she's more a PR face/Producer type than like a full on game director or something.[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]
[QUOTE="AcidSoldner"]Jade Raymond
jg4xchamp
Waiting for feminist game designers to make thier own games instead of demanding others to change.
EvanTheGamer
This. If you dont like there are games that pander to males why dont feminists make games that pander to a female audience.
In fact, unlike common belief, Japan actually makes games that pander to the sexual fetishes of both males and females (japanese games that pander to sexual fetishes of females are called fujoshi games) , the thing is that japanese games that pander to females are very niche even Japan which is the reason why they never get localized.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment