[QUOTE="OB-47"]
I don't think the legnth is too bad. While you're playing it's like the best time of you're life
Inconsistancy
It was kinda fun, but Rage is more fun in it's pure gameplay (just shooting, IGNORE ALL IT'S FLAWS, like story, buggies, textures, the terrible bosses, and AMD side driver issues). Fun story that makes me smile or giggle < great gunplay,which is damn rare.
Didn't like Wheatley... Portal1 was more fun because I liked GLaDOS, but still completely devoid of replay value and both are horrendously short.
Also, with it's gameplay and presentation, I have a very hard time imagining it being longer, or more varied in it's environment types, gameplay, or story style... it's just feels very limited. Maybe if they combined it with a semi-real world setting, with Mirror's Edge mechanics and looks somehow, with the portal gun!
Cut the BS that Valve made it so it get's a free pass. Maybe they, i don't know, make high quality games consistantly and have yet to dissapoint us? Some of you may not like the game but don't go around making little conspiracy theories because they have yet to make a low scoring game
OB-47
Who's 'us', Portal2 was actually a pretty big dissapointment, if you hate stupid characters (Wheatley{ai, as in: artificial idiot}), and were expecting a more 'full' game. Portal2, to me, didn't feel like it was much more of a fully developed game than Portal1 did...
Us are the people constantly impressed by Valve, gamers and reviewers alike. And Wheatly isn't a stupid character, many people found him funny in a dorky kind of way. His dialogue was better than most "serious" games dialogue. To me it felt like a much bigger game than Portal 1. It had more features in gameplay, huge levels, better graphics, better writing, co-op and a whole lot more content.
If you're dissapointed by Portal 2, than fine, I don't know what you were expecting, but there is no conspiracy that people gave Portal a free pass because it was Valve.
Log in to comment