PS2 to Xbox360 GPU jump vs Xbox360 to PS4 GPU jump....

  • 99 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts

How big was the upgrade in graphics from PS2 to Xbox360? Does the upgrade from X360 to PS4 even compare?

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
Nope.
Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
Best of previous gen > new gen
Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts
Nope. clyde46
Wait so youre saying that Sony/MS are cheapskates now?
Avatar image for Eddie-Vedder
Eddie-Vedder

7810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Eddie-Vedder
Member since 2003 • 7810 Posts

Seems like the Xbone to the PS4 is pretty similar to the PS2 to the 360. Gonna be rough for lems. 

Avatar image for TheKingIAm
TheKingIAm

1531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 TheKingIAm
Member since 2013 • 1531 Posts
Hell no.
Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts
Where are my $700+ consoles sold at $400? http://www.joystiq.com/2005/12/28/xbox-360-costs-715-to-make/
Avatar image for Razor_defiace
Razor_defiace

1618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Razor_defiace
Member since 2004 • 1618 Posts

Why compare the jump from PS2 to 360? Why not xbox 1(lawl) to xbox 360? What if you compare the jump from DC to 360? 

Same for this gen. What if you compare the jump from Wii to PS4? lol 

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

Guys, this thread has nothing to do with the XBone.

Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts
The jump is small.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d78760d7d740
deactivated-5d78760d7d740

16386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 deactivated-5d78760d7d740
Member since 2009 • 16386 Posts

How do we know how big the graphics jump will be before the generation even started.

We need to actually see the devs get used to the hardware first.

Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts

Why compare the jump from PS2 to 360? Why not xbox 1(lawl) to xbox 360? What if you compare the jump from DC to 360? 

Same for this gen. What if you compare the jump from Wii to PS4? lol 

Razor_defiace
PS2 6th GEN of consoles ----->> 360 7th gen of consoles 360 7th gen of console--------->> PS4 8th gen of consoles
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="clyde46"]Nope. True_Gamer_
Wait so youre saying that Sony/MS are cheapskates now?

The tech has advanced past the consoles. The 360 launched with the worlds first unified shader GPU. There's nothing like that this time around.
Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts
[QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="clyde46"]Nope. clyde46
Wait so youre saying that Sony/MS are cheapskates now?

The tech has advanced past the consoles. The 360 launched with the worlds first unified shader GPU. There's nothing like that this time around.

So in order to be on scale with the 360 MS would have to put a 7970 in the Xbone?
Avatar image for Razor_defiace
Razor_defiace

1618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Razor_defiace
Member since 2004 • 1618 Posts

[QUOTE="Razor_defiace"]

Why compare the jump from PS2 to 360? Why not xbox 1(lawl) to xbox 360? What if you compare the jump from DC to 360? 

Same for this gen. What if you compare the jump from Wii to PS4? lol 

True_Gamer_

PS2 6th GEN of consoles ----->> 360 7th gen of consoles 360 7th gen of console--------->> PS4 8th gen of consoles

But wasn't the PS2 the weakest console of gen 6, thus making your comparison a bit strange?

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="True_Gamer_"] Wait so youre saying that Sony/MS are cheapskates now?

The tech has advanced past the consoles. The 360 launched with the worlds first unified shader GPU. There's nothing like that this time around.

So in order to be on scale with the 360 MS would have to put a 7970 in the Xbone?

That would be a stupid and costly mistake. AMD are releasing the 8000 series at the end of this year and they will trump the 7970.
Avatar image for PCgameruk
PCgameruk

2273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 PCgameruk
Member since 2012 • 2273 Posts

The jump is good its just you wont see it yet. 1080p and AA is a big jump imo because of us using 50" HDTV's. sub HD and no AA was a mess.

A few years we will see much better looking games and engines for the new hardware.

Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#18 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts
[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="clyde46"] The tech has advanced past the consoles. The 360 launched with the worlds first unified shader GPU. There's nothing like that this time around.

So in order to be on scale with the 360 MS would have to put a 7970 in the Xbone?

That would be a stupid and costly mistake. AMD are releasing the 8000 series at the end of this year and they will trump the 7970.

So the X1 should have launched with a 8970 inside in order to not fail the 360's tradition?
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="True_Gamer_"] So in order to be on scale with the 360 MS would have to put a 7970 in the Xbone?

That would be a stupid and costly mistake. AMD are releasing the 8000 series at the end of this year and they will trump the 7970.

So the X1 should have launched with a 8970 inside in order to not fail the 360's tradition?

I'm thinking you aren't understanding what I'm saying. When the 360 was being designed, 3D graphics processing was relatively primitive compared to today. The 360 came with the Unified Shader GPU which made doing graphical processing much easier. At that point in the time, the 360 was more advanced that most high end PC's. It was about 6 months before the release of the PS3 IIRC before PC users got a decent Unified Shader GPU in the form of the monster that was the 8800 series. This time, there isn't any tech that would provide consoles with some secret sauce. The 8th consoles are pretty much low cost PC's with closed OS's.
Avatar image for mastershake575
mastershake575

8574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 mastershake575
Member since 2007 • 8574 Posts

The 360 was running a $400-500 destop equivalent GPU that had unified shaders (which wasn't even out on the desktop market yet).

The ps4 is running a GPU similiar performance wise to a GTX 650ti boost SC which is valued around $155 in todays price...... (I think you get the picture).

To be honest I paid less than $200 for my 7870xt and my current overclock (without messing with the volts) puts it around 2x the performance as the ps4's GPU (this is something I paid less than $200 for).

Avatar image for Grey_Eyed_Elf
Grey_Eyed_Elf

7971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Grey_Eyed_Elf
Member since 2011 • 7971 Posts
No looks like both companies want to take as little of a finincial dent as possible for the initial console sales. Previous generations they made a loss due to the hardware being sold for less than it took to manufacture and now they are trying to either make a profit or break even from the get go with hardware sales. In turn making this jump in hardware smaller than the last.
Avatar image for DerekLoffin
DerekLoffin

9095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#22 DerekLoffin
Member since 2002 • 9095 Posts
[QUOTE="Razor_defiace"]

Why compare the jump from PS2 to 360? Why not xbox 1(lawl) to xbox 360? What if you compare the jump from DC to 360? 

Same for this gen. What if you compare the jump from Wii to PS4? lol 

True_Gamer_
PS2 6th GEN of consoles ----->> 360 7th gen of consoles 360 7th gen of console--------->> PS4 8th gen of consoles

That still doesn't make sense. GC, DC and XB were all part of 6th Gen as well, and all had different power levels. Why PS2 to 360. Likewise why 360 to PS4? If you're looking at the most popular in each gen, it would be PS2 -> Wii and since we don't know the popularity yet, should probably be comparing Wii to both X1 and PS4. PS2 wasn't the weakest, but if we ignore the DC, then we should still be comparing to Wii... yeah, this just doesn't make sense.
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

Since when does hardware power sell consoles? ;)

N64, first Xbox and PS3 were the strongest in their gens and none managed to get 1st place.

But if you want a picture:

PS2 to X360 - similar to Voodoo 5 (DX7) to Radeon X1800 (DX9) jump

X360 to PS4 - similar to Radeon X1800 (DX9) to Radeon HD 7850 (DX11) jump

 

It's not so small jump but it's also true X360 was released far sooner than the PS4. (& X1)

Avatar image for masterninja9
masterninja9

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 masterninja9
Member since 2013 • 203 Posts
Not in the slightest.
Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts
[QUOTE="clyde46"]Nope. True_Gamer_
Wait so youre saying that Sony/MS are cheapskates now?

No, you are. He simply said "nope". Do you really have that hard of a time grasping what you read?
Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#26 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17957 Posts

Seems like the Xbone to the PS4 is pretty similar to the PS2 to the 360. Gonna be rough for lems. 

Eddie-Vedder
Seems like you have no idea what you are talking about......
Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

It's a smaller jump than the last time. Xbox 360 was competitive with high-end PC graphics cards when it launched. PS4 and especially Xbox One will be nowhere near high-end PC graphics cards when they launch.

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

It's a smaller jump than the last time. Xbox 360 was competitive with high-end PC graphics cards when it launched. PS4 and especially Xbox One will be nowhere near high-end PC graphics cards when they launch.

Wickerman777

 

But putting things into perspective - X360 was only competitive for the first year or two while PS3 was "dated on release".

Namely the GeForce 8800 combined with Intel Q6600 and 2 GB RAM put both consoles in the "trash bin" when it came to graphics. (see Crysis 1)

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

Seems like the Xbone to the PS4 is pretty similar to the PS2 to the 360. Gonna be rough for lems. 

navyguy21

Seems like you have no idea what you are talking about......

I don't know if the graphics gap is that big but it is big. Bigger than what separates 360 and PS3.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

[QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

It's a smaller jump than the last time. Xbox 360 was competitive with high-end PC graphics cards when it launched. PS4 and especially Xbox One will be nowhere near high-end PC graphics cards when they launch.

nameless12345

 

But putting things into perspective - X360 was only competitive for the first year or two while PS3 was "dated on release".

Namely the GeForce 8800 combined with Intel Q6600 and 2 GB RAM put both consoles in the "trash bin" when it came to graphics. (see Crysis 1)

Of course the PC market surpassed it after a year or two because the PC market evolves constantly. Still the fact remains that when the 360 launched it had a damned good GPU in it for its time.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#31 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17957 Posts

[QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

Seems like the Xbone to the PS4 is pretty similar to the PS2 to the 360. Gonna be rough for lems. 

Wickerman777

Seems like you have no idea what you are talking about......

I don't know if the GPU gap is that big but it is big. Bigger than what separates 360 and PS3.

LOL, says cows? Do you actually understand what the tech in each is capable of or are you just going on internet information?
Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

[QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

[QUOTE="navyguy21"] Seems like you have no idea what you are talking about......navyguy21

I don't know if the GPU gap is that big but it is big. Bigger than what separates 360 and PS3.

LOL, says cows? Do you actually understand what the tech in each is capable of or are you just going on internet information?

Umm, unless you've been invited to some personal tour aren't we all going by internet information? Everyone knows that Xbox One has 12 compute units and PS4 has 18. That's a big difference.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

[QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

[QUOTE="navyguy21"] Seems like you have no idea what you are talking about......navyguy21

I don't know if the GPU gap is that big but it is big. Bigger than what separates 360 and PS3.

LOL, says cows? Do you actually understand what the tech in each is capable of or are you just going on internet information?

And btw, I'm not a cow at all. I haven't owned a Sony console since the original Playstation. I would prefer Xbox One to be more powerful, or heck, even as powerful as PS4 but it just isn't.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#34 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17957 Posts

[QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

I don't know if the GPU gap is that big but it is big. Bigger than what separates 360 and PS3.

Wickerman777

LOL, says cows? Do you actually understand what the tech in each is capable of or are you just going on internet information?

Umm, unless you've been invited to some personal tour aren't we all going by internet information? Everyone knows that Xbox One has 12 compute units and PS4 has 18. That's a big difference.

Not entirely true. 2 people can get the same information and get drastically different conclusions based on their education on the given information. For you to assume that 18>12 is a big difference would be pure speculation if you dont understand what compute units are or what they are capable of. For example, cows say that the power is a huge difference, yet when XBone's GPU was increased 53mhz, it was brushed off as minor. Do you know how each systems OS will be handled? If those extra compute units will be always dedicated to something else? You have no idea, so to speculate would be basically saying you are blinded by the internet info or either are a fanboy of either side already.
Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

[QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

[QUOTE="navyguy21"]LOL, says cows? Do you actually understand what the tech in each is capable of or are you just going on internet information?navyguy21

Umm, unless you've been invited to some personal tour aren't we all going by internet information? Everyone knows that Xbox One has 12 compute units and PS4 has 18. That's a big difference.

Not entirely true. 2 people can get the same information and get drastically different conclusions based on their education on the given information. For you to assume that 18>12 is a big difference would be pure speculation if you dont understand what compute units are or what they are capable of. For example, cows say that the power is a huge difference, yet when XBone's GPU was increased 53mhz, it was brushed off as minor. Do you know how each systems OS will be handled? If those extra compute units will be always dedicated to something else? You have no idea, so to speculate would be basically saying you are blinded by the internet info or either are a fanboy of either side already.

Lol, what's there to understand? It's 1.8 tflops vs 1.2 (Now 1.3). In other words it's roughly 7X the power of 360 vs 5X the power of 360. Everyone understands it just fine. You're going on about cows and bias but you're the only one showing it ... hell ... you're drowning in it. Does this mean PS4 will be more fun than Xbox One? Not necessarily. Heck, if ya ask me one big knock on PS4 is that god-awful controller. But to anyone without blinders on it's obvious that PS4 has a lot more graphics processing under its hood than Xbox One does.

Avatar image for genfactor
genfactor

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#36 genfactor
Member since 2004 • 1472 Posts
Jumps in graphics get smaller with every generation because of the law of diminishing returns.
Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#37 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17957 Posts

[QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

Umm, unless you've been invited to some personal tour aren't we all going by internet information? Everyone knows that Xbox One has 12 compute units and PS4 has 18. That's a big difference.

Wickerman777

Not entirely true. 2 people can get the same information and get drastically different conclusions based on their education on the given information. For you to assume that 18>12 is a big difference would be pure speculation if you dont understand what compute units are or what they are capable of. For example, cows say that the power is a huge difference, yet when XBone's GPU was increased 53mhz, it was brushed off as minor. Do you know how each systems OS will be handled? If those extra compute units will be always dedicated to something else? You have no idea, so to speculate would be basically saying you are blinded by the internet info or either are a fanboy of either side already.

Lol, what's there to understand? It's 1.8 tflops vs 1.2 (Now 1.3). In other words it's roughly 7X the power of 360 vs 5X the power of 360. Everyone understands it just fine. You're going on about cows and bias but you're the only one showing it ... hell ... you're drowning in it. Does this mean PS4 will be more fun than Xbox One? Not necessarily. Heck, if ya ask me one big knock on PS4 is that god-awful controller. But to anyone without blinders on it's obvious that PS4 has a lot more graphics processing under its hood than Xbox One does.

lol, how am i drowning in it? By asking questions and not blindly believing what i read? Or is it that i use my knowledge of computers and technology to help form my opinion?
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

I honestly think anyone who thinks that is gonna be in for a surprise. The next gen systems have pretty underwhelming hardware though. 

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

[QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

It's a smaller jump than the last time. Xbox 360 was competitive with high-end PC graphics cards when it launched. PS4 and especially Xbox One will be nowhere near high-end PC graphics cards when they launch.

Wickerman777

 

But putting things into perspective - X360 was only competitive for the first year or two while PS3 was "dated on release".

Namely the GeForce 8800 combined with Intel Q6600 and 2 GB RAM put both consoles in the "trash bin" when it came to graphics. (see Crysis 1)

Of course the PC market surpassed it after a year or two because the PC market evolves constantly. Still the fact remains that when the 360 launched it had a damned good GPU in it for its time.

 

X1 could have had a better GPU if they didn't invest into the next-gen Kinect so heavily.

It seems many console companies now think that just hardware alone is not enough to push consoles to wider audience. (see Wii U's "tablet" controller & Kinect)

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

[QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

[QUOTE="navyguy21"]Not entirely true. 2 people can get the same information and get drastically different conclusions based on their education on the given information. For you to assume that 18>12 is a big difference would be pure speculation if you dont understand what compute units are or what they are capable of. For example, cows say that the power is a huge difference, yet when XBone's GPU was increased 53mhz, it was brushed off as minor. Do you know how each systems OS will be handled? If those extra compute units will be always dedicated to something else? You have no idea, so to speculate would be basically saying you are blinded by the internet info or either are a fanboy of either side already.navyguy21

Lol, what's there to understand? It's 1.8 tflops vs 1.2 (Now 1.3). In other words it's roughly 7X the power of 360 vs 5X the power of 360. Everyone understands it just fine. You're going on about cows and bias but you're the only one showing it ... hell ... you're drowning in it. Does this mean PS4 will be more fun than Xbox One? Not necessarily. Heck, if ya ask me one big knock on PS4 is that god-awful controller. But to anyone without blinders on it's obvious that PS4 has a lot more graphics processing under its hood than Xbox One does.

lol, how am i drowning in it? By asking questions and not blindly believing what i read? Or is it that i use my knowledge of computers and technology to help form my opinion?

Well, if ya know about PC tech than you know that 18 AMD 7000 series compute units > 12 of them, lol.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#41 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17957 Posts

[QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

Lol, what's there to understand? It's 1.8 tflops vs 1.2 (Now 1.3). In other words it's roughly 7X the power of 360 vs 5X the power of 360. Everyone understands it just fine. You're going on about cows and bias but you're the only one showing it ... hell ... you're drowning in it. Does this mean PS4 will be more fun than Xbox One? Not necessarily. Heck, if ya ask me one big knock on PS4 is that god-awful controller. But to anyone without blinders on it's obvious that PS4 has a lot more graphics processing under its hood than Xbox One does.

Wickerman777

lol, how am i drowning in it? By asking questions and not blindly believing what i read? Or is it that i use my knowledge of computers and technology to help form my opinion?

Well, if ya know about PC tech than you know that 18 AMD compute units > 12 of them, lol.

But that isnt what our "debate" is about. A first grader would know 18>12. What it MEANS in real world processing is a different animal. As i said before, you keep talking as if a larger number = a large advantage, which isnt true at all, especially when there are so many other variables and moving parts. You ignore those, which is my point.
Avatar image for Tessellation
Tessellation

9297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Tessellation
Member since 2009 • 9297 Posts
lol,these next gen games on consoles look like current gen games at 1080p with few effects and better lighting.
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

Jumps in graphics get smaller with every generation because of the law of diminishing returns.genfactor

 

They are getting bigger but the difference is getting harder to spot.

The jumps in previous console gens seemed massive because of the big polygon-count, AA and resolution increases but now it's harder to see the difference between a 40k poly model with high-res normal maps & last gen, 20k poly model with lower-res normal maps.

The "graphics race" isn't so significant anymore as it once was, altho devs invest heavily into graphics, still.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

[QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

[QUOTE="navyguy21"] lol, how am i drowning in it? By asking questions and not blindly believing what i read? Or is it that i use my knowledge of computers and technology to help form my opinion?navyguy21

Well, if ya know about PC tech than you know that 18 AMD compute units > 12 of them, lol.

But that isnt what our "debate" is about. A first grader would know 18>12. What it MEANS in real world processing is a different animal. As i said before, you keep talking as if a larger number = a large advantage, which isnt true at all, especially when there are so many other variables and moving parts. You ignore those, which is my point.

There are articles EVERYWHERE that get into fine detail about why PS4 is more powerful. I'm not about to spend a freaking hour typing out all that stuff to you. If you're gonna be outside of the cave you've apparently been spending so much of your time in for a few more minutes check some of them out.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#45 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17957 Posts

[QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

Well, if ya know about PC tech than you know that 18 AMD compute units > 12 of them, lol.

Wickerman777

But that isnt what our "debate" is about. A first grader would know 18>12. What it MEANS in real world processing is a different animal. As i said before, you keep talking as if a larger number = a large advantage, which isnt true at all, especially when there are so many other variables and moving parts. You ignore those, which is my point.

There are articles EVERYWHERE that get into fine detail about why PS4 is more powerful. I'm not about to spend a freaking hour typing out all that stuff to you. If you're gonna be outside of the cave you've apparently been spending so much of your time in for a few more minutes check some of them out.

I have read them all, hell we have talked about them in presentations. Im just not blind. Again, im not saying the PS4 ISNT more powerful. You keep assuming that. The PS4 is clearly the more powerful system, and not just the GPU. What i thought we were debating is the disparity between the two. You said it was larger than PS3 vs 360. I NEVER said that PS4 was weaker or that the XB1 was as powerful. I have been defending the disparity this whole time. The difference in power isnt as large as you are trying to make it seem, bottom line. That was my whole point and it has remained the same. Your argument is all over the place.
Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

[QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

[QUOTE="navyguy21"]But that isnt what our "debate" is about. A first grader would know 18>12. What it MEANS in real world processing is a different animal. As i said before, you keep talking as if a larger number = a large advantage, which isnt true at all, especially when there are so many other variables and moving parts. You ignore those, which is my point.navyguy21

There are articles EVERYWHERE that get into fine detail about why PS4 is more powerful. I'm not about to spend a freaking hour typing out all that stuff to you. If you're gonna be outside of the cave you've apparently been spending so much of your time in for a few more minutes check some of them out.

I have read them all, hell we have talked about them in presentations. Im just not blind. Again, im not saying the PS4 ISNT more powerful. You keep assuming that. The PS4 is clearly the more powerful system, and not just the GPU. What i thought we were debating is the disparity between the two. You said it was larger than PS3 vs 360. I NEVER said that PS4 was weaker or that the XB1 was as powerful. I have been defending the disparity this whole time. The difference in power isnt as large as you are trying to make it seem, bottom line. That was my whole point and it has remained the same. Your argument is all over the place.

It's a 500-600 gflops difference, more than 2 360s' worth of power. In your world perhaps that's nothing, in mine it's a pretty big difference.

Avatar image for Netherscourge
Netherscourge

16364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#47 Netherscourge
Member since 2003 • 16364 Posts

How big was the upgrade in graphics from PS2 to Xbox360? Does the upgrade from X360 to PS4 even compare?

True_Gamer_

 

The Xbox 360 tops out at 0.25 TFLOPS

The Playstation 4 tops out at 1.84 TFLOPS

I'd call that a rather HUGE upgrade.

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#48 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts
Best of previous gen > new genMonsieurX
The PS3 > PS4? What!?!?! There was a huge jump from PS2 to XBox 360. PS2 wasn't even HD for one.
Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

[QUOTE="True_Gamer_"]

How big was the upgrade in graphics from PS2 to Xbox360? Does the upgrade from X360 to PS4 even compare?

Netherscourge

 

The Xbox 360 tops out at 0.25 TFLOPS

The Playstation 4 tops out at 1.84 TFLOPS

I'd call that a rather HUGE upgrade.

It's around a 7X jump. Xbox One is around 5X as powerful as 360. Considering that 360 came out in 2005 I expected a 10X jump. But oh well, guess we're not getting that.

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#50 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

[QUOTE="True_Gamer_"]

How big was the upgrade in graphics from PS2 to Xbox360? Does the upgrade from X360 to PS4 even compare?

Netherscourge

 

The Xbox 360 tops out at 0.25 TFLOPS

The Playstation 4 tops out at 1.84 TFLOPS

I'd call that a rather HUGE upgrade.

How many TFLOPS was the PS3 to the PS4?