PS3 can only run Rage at 20-30fps

http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/games/r/rage/carmack-rage-faster-on-xbox-360-and-pc-$1315438.htm

"In the latest Edge magazine, programming wizard John Carmack states that the Xbox 360 version of RAGE just about matches the 60fps framerate of the PC version, while the PS3 only runs the game at around 20-30fps at this stage in development. "

Lol @ other poster on the other rage thread saying PS3 version will be light years ahead of 360 version.

Another multiplat is superior on 360....what a surprise

http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/games/r/rage/carmack-rage-faster-on-xbox-360-and-pc-$1315438.htm

"In the latest Edge magazine, programming wizard John Carmack states that the Xbox 360 version of RAGE just about matches the 60fps framerate of the PC version, while the PS3 only runs the game at around 20-30fps at this stage in development. "

markinthedark

It's not like the game comes out tomorrow. We've got plenty of time.

This article is from July 2009. Why are we bringing up old news. Lets get some current news where the versions stand.

Gettin' the PC version, so none of these frame-rate troubles bother me! 8)

[QUOTE="markinthedark"]

http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/games/r/rage/carmack-rage-faster-on-xbox-360-and-pc-$1315438.htm

"In the latest Edge magazine, programming wizard John Carmack states that the Xbox 360 version of RAGE just about matches the 60fps framerate of the PC version, while the PS3 only runs the game at around 20-30fps at this stage in development. "

felipebo

It's not like the game comes out tomorrow. We've got plenty of time.

*1 year ago*

FF13 to be on 3 discs.

It's not like the game comes out tomorrow. We've got plenty of time.

Cows will avoid this like the plague.

[QUOTE="felipebo"]

[QUOTE="markinthedark"]

http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/games/r/rage/carmack-rage-faster-on-xbox-360-and-pc-$1315438.htm

"In the latest Edge magazine, programming wizard John Carmack states that the Xbox 360 version of RAGE just about matches the 60fps framerate of the PC version, while the PS3 only runs the game at around 20-30fps at this stage in development. "

Modern_Unit

It's not like the game comes out tomorrow. We've got plenty of time.

*1 year ago*

FF13 to be on 3 discs.

It's not like the game comes out tomorrow. We've got plenty of time.

The article is from a year ago. :|

That was an article from last year..

Nice job posting an article from 2009, didn't Carmack say all versions were running at 60fps at E3?bleehum

"John Carmack of iD Software reveals that RAGE's framerate suffers considerably on the PlayStation 3.

Written directly above that: "Friday, 31 Jul 2009 09:38"

Yeah...I read this back when it was, you know, NEWS. You know, the way "new" implies that the information presented is NEW.

http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/games/r/rage/carmack-rage-faster-on-xbox-360-and-pc-$1315438.htm

"In the latest Edge magazine, programming wizard John Carmack states that the Xbox 360 version of RAGE just about matches the 60fps framerate of the PC version, while the PS3 only runs the game at around 20-30fps at this stage in development. "

markinthedark

[QUOTE="felipebo"]

[QUOTE="markinthedark"]

http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/games/r/rage/carmack-rage-faster-on-xbox-360-and-pc-$1315438.htm

"In the latest Edge magazine, programming wizard John Carmack states that the Xbox 360 version of RAGE just about matches the 60fps framerate of the PC version, while the PS3 only runs the game at around 20-30fps at this stage in development. "

Modern_Unit

It's not like the game comes out tomorrow. We've got plenty of time.

*1 year ago*

FF13 to be on 3 discs.

It's not like the game comes out tomorrow. We've got plenty of time.

Oh, didn't see the date. But I stand by what I said.

Nice job posting an article from 2009, didn't Carmack say all versions were running at 60fps at E3?bleehum

Correct. He also said that the PS3 version would have slightly sharper textures in some areas due to the storage capacity of Blu-Ray.

[QUOTE="markinthedark"]

http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/games/r/rage/carmack-rage-faster-on-xbox-360-and-pc-$1315438.htm

"In the latest Edge magazine, programming wizard John Carmack states that the Xbox 360 version of RAGE just about matches the 60fps framerate of the PC version, while the PS3 only runs the game at around 20-30fps at this stage in development. "

heretrix

Yeah, in July 2009 the 360 version was running better. Let's get back to the present.

[QUOTE="bleehum"] Nice job posting an article from 2009, didn't Carmack say all versions were running at 60fps at E3?Ryan_Som

Correct. He also said that the PS3 version would have slightly sharper textures in some areas due to the storage capacity of Blu-Ray.

Cows will avoid this like the plague.

SrgtSaggy101

This is probably why we didnt see a ps3 version at e3... regardless of the date.

This is probably why we didnt see a ps3 version at e3... regardless of the date.

markinthedark

http://kotaku.com/5031985/rage-and-ids-lovehate-relationship-with-the-ps3

PS3 version will look better confirmed!

"at this stage of development"

The engine was built for the PC first. ID will get it up to 60fps when they really start pounding out the PS3 version.

Like everyone said this is 1 year old. Also this explains why the 360 version was only shown since that version is proboly more done then the PS3 one.

[QUOTE="markinthedark"]

This is probably why we didnt see a ps3 version at e3... regardless of the date.

Espada12

http://kotaku.com/5031985/rage-and-ids-lovehate-relationship-with-the-ps3

PS3 version will look better confirmed!

that article is from 2008.... clearly carmack was wrong.

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="markinthedark"]

This is probably why we didnt see a ps3 version at e3... regardless of the date.

markinthedark

http://kotaku.com/5031985/rage-and-ids-lovehate-relationship-with-the-ps3

PS3 version will look better confirmed!

that article is from 2008.... clearly carmack was wrong.

So what changed from 08 to now? :lol:

Yea a year ago this was the case because ID is new to working on the PS3 platform...

at E3 though they said the PS3 version ran identicle to the 360 version in the RAGE interview.

[QUOTE="markinthedark"]

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

http://kotaku.com/5031985/rage-and-ids-lovehate-relationship-with-the-ps3

PS3 version will look better confirmed!

Espada12

that article is from 2008.... clearly carmack was wrong.

So what changed from 08 to now? :lol:

The article that i posted from 09 saying the ps3 version can only handle 20-30fps.

[QUOTE="SrgtSaggy101"]

Cows will avoid this like the plague.

heretrix

This is bad news, back then. I just watched the GS stage show and the creative director say it will run 60fps on all systems. I'm still getting it on the 360 because of the controllers.

This would be a funny ownage if true! :P

Let´s wait for the final version for the proper comparations.

This would be a funny ownage if true! :P

Let´s wait for the final version for the proper comparations.

PAL360

As of Jun 22, 2010, both version are running at 60 FPS according to Carmack:

http://www.beyond3d.com/content/news/751

http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/games/r/rage/carmack-rage-faster-on-xbox-360-and-pc-$1315438.htm

"In the latest Edge magazine, programming wizard John Carmack states that the Xbox 360 version of RAGE just about matches the 60fps framerate of the PC version, while the PS3 only runs the game at around 20-30fps at this stage in development. "

markinthedark

This is bad news, back then. I just watched the GS stage show and the creative director say it will run 60fps on all systems. I'm still getting it on the 360 because of the controllers.

gago-gago

guy deleted the article but it said "For Rage, we have to expend more effort on the PS3 to maintain 60 hz "

translation: they had to scale back the graphics for 60fps

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

This would be a funny ownage if true! :P

Let´s wait for the final version for the proper comparations.

Sollet

Thats why i said `if true` :P

It was already confirmed both versions will be equal :)

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="markinthedark"]

that article is from 2008.... clearly carmack was wrong.

markinthedark

So what changed from 08 to now? :lol:

The article that i posted from 09 saying the ps3 version can only handle 20-30fps.

And in 2010 we have carmack stating both are running at 60fps. So the PS3 version is going to look better and both run at 60FPS. PS3 superior confirmed.

.. Isn't this expected in early development? The PS3 is harder to design for seeing as it doesn't use the typical architecture for designing.. Clearly the Xbox360 would run better in the beginning, because it use a standard architecture.. This by no means that its going to run better at the final product.

BTW carmack confirmed the PS3 is more powerful.

Then, Carmack talked about developing for consoles for the first time with Rage. He feels that the PS3 has more processing power but that the 360 is easier to program for.

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6215286.html

BTW carmack confirmed the PS3 is more powerful.

Then, Carmack talked about developing for consoles for the first time with Rage. He feels that the PS3 has more processing power but that the 360 is easier to program for.

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6215286.html

Espada12

It better be seeing as how much more expensivethe PS3 has been over the years.

BTW carmack confirmed the PS3 is more powerful.

Then, Carmack talked about developing for consoles for the first time with Rage. He feels that the PS3 has more processing power but that the 360 is easier to program for.

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6215286.html

Espada12

As of Jun 22, 2010, both version are running at 60 FPS according to Carmack:

http://www.beyond3d.com/content/news/751

fun-da-mental

in that article it says...

"For Rage, we have to expend more effort on the PS3 to maintain 60 hz"

so while the good news is while they did manage to get 60fps... they probably had to scale back the graphics

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

BTW carmack confirmed the PS3 is more powerful.

Then, Carmack talked about developing for consoles for the first time with Rage. He feels that the PS3 has more processing power but that the 360 is easier to program for.

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6215286.html

KittenWishes

What changed between the consoles since then? :lol:

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="markinthedark"]

that article is from 2008.... clearly carmack was wrong.

markinthedark

So what changed from 08 to now? :lol:

The article that i posted from 09 saying the ps3 version can only handle 20-30fps.

I've read an article from 2004 with Carmack saying that Rage will be superior on the Gamecube,FACT.

Lets see if I can dig it up from somewhere......

This article you posted is from Friday, 31 Jul 2009 09:38

http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/games/r/rage/carmack-rage-faster-on-xbox-360-and-pc-$1315438.htm

This year, Id said that Rage is running better on the PS3

id demos Rage on 360, promises smooth gaming on PS3 - 9:40 AM on 05.04.2010

http://www.destructoid.com/id-demos-rage-on-360-promises-smooth-gaming-on-ps3-172760.phtml

At a Bethesda Softworks press event last month, id Software brought out the latest build of its upcoming first-person shooter, Rage. Previously shown only running on a PC, the developer pulled out its Xbox 360 kits to demonstrate the game.

But what of the PlayStation 3? id Software's Tim Willits says not to worry, that the engine that powers Rage, idTech 5, is "true cross-platform technology."

"We demoed on the 360 here today," he explained, "but our program director actually said 'Do you want to take the PS3? I think it's actually running better.'"

moti-123

hrmm, alright that quote is a little hard to refute....