PS3 compared to PC

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]Not in game. MGS 4 has the best graphics of any game. PC fanboys are denying it. :lol: foxhound_fox

There is no current processor that can match the power of "Teh" Cell. Not even a lowly quad core.nVidiaGaMer

Thr almighty Cell in the PS3 is an "In Order Processor", making it about as techinally complex as a pentium 1, any PC processor fro the last 3 or 4 years is more powerful than the cell

MGS4 Isn't the best looking game but it's one of the best! Name a few game (exept Crysis) That have MGS 4 games ( AND I WANT THE 4-3 years old) !MKLOL

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]There is no current processor that can match the power of "Teh" Cell. Not even a lowly quad core.crispytheone88

Thr almighty Cell in the PS3 is an "In Order Processor", making it about as techinally complex as a pentium 1, any PC processor fro the last 3 or 4 years is more powerful than the cell

Define 'more powerful'?

[QUOTE="crispytheone88"]

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]There is no current processor that can match the power of "Teh" Cell. Not even a lowly quad core.Pro_wrestler

Thr almighty Cell in the PS3 is an "In Order Processor", making it about as techinally complex as a pentium 1, any PC processor fro the last 3 or 4 years is more powerful than the cell

Define 'more powerful'?

okay, im NOT a console fanboy but isnt the ps3 cpu supposed to be like 20ghz? i thought i heard this somewhere, dont eat me if im wrong!

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]Not in game. MGS 4 has the best graphics of any game. PC fanboys are denying it. :lol: MKLOL

From a purely technical point of view i think lots of PC games beat MGS4. Now, to fully apreciate just how good PC games can look you would of course need access to a high spec gaming pc.

The following, ran at high resolution (no laughable 720p and under), minimum of 8xAA, 16xAF and all ingame setting at maximum imho look better "technically" than MGS4. By technically i mean texture resolution, effects, lighting etc etc.

Company of Heroes..........scored 10/10 for graphics under the old review system here on GS.

World in Conflict............... Extremely detailed with loads of fancy lighting and effects going on.

Call of Duty 4 (PC)........... Until you have seen this at high resolution you can never know how good it looks

Bioshock (PC)................. The high levels of AF available on the PC combined with much higher resolutions make this game look awsome at times.

Gears of War (PC).........Same as above

I'm sure people could add more. The fact is the PS3 could never run any of these games, no matter how well optimized they were at maximum ingame graphical settings at 1080p.

ps3>ccomputer its used as a super computer for many companies, NASA and the WHITEHOUSE use them in all of their networks because its just that much faster then anything else out there.UIitimateFanboy

Weren't those April fool's jokes?

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]There is no current processor that can match the power of "Teh" Cell. Not even a lowly quad core.crispytheone88

Thr almighty Cell in the PS3 is an "In Order Processor", making it about as techinally complex as a pentium 1, any PC processor fro the last 3 or 4 years is more powerful than the cell

:lol: Its the most complex processor to program and each of the 6 free cores can be programmed to do different tasks (physics, sounds, explosions). A puny quad core can't touch teh cell.

[QUOTE="crispytheone88"]

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]There is no current processor that can match the power of "Teh" Cell. Not even a lowly quad core.nVidiaGaMer

Thr almighty Cell in the PS3 is an "In Order Processor", making it about as techinally complex as a pentium 1, any PC processor fro the last 3 or 4 years is more powerful than the cell

:lol: Its the most complex processor to program and each of the 6 free cores can be programmed to do different tasks (physics, sounds, explosions). A puny quad core can't touch teh cell.

Are you really this desperate for attention?

[QUOTE="MKLOL"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]Not in game. MGS 4 has the best graphics of any game. PC fanboys are denying it. :lol: Frozzik

From a purely technical point of view i think lots of PC games beat MGS4. Now, to fully apreciate just how good PC games can look you would of course need access to a high spec gaming pc.

The following, ran at high resolution (no laughable 720p and under), minimum of 8xAA, 16xAF and all ingame setting at maximum imho look better "technically" than MGS4. By technically i mean texture resolution, effects, lighting etc etc.

Company of Heroes..........scored 10/10 for graphics under the old review system here on GS.

World in Conflict............... Extremely detailed with loads of fancy lighting and effects going on.

Call of Duty 4 (PC)........... Until you have seen this at high resolution you can never know how good it looks

Bioshock (PC)................. The high levels of AF available on the PC combined with much higher resolutions make this game look awsome at times.

Gears of War (PC).........Same as above

I'm sure people could add more. The fact is the PS3 could never run any of these games, no matter how well optimized they were at maximum ingame graphical settings at 1080p.

There is no vast difference between 720P or 1080P so it doesn't matter. On a small 720P the game looks just as good as on a giant 1080P screen.

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"][QUOTE="crispytheone88"]

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]There is no current processor that can match the power of "Teh" Cell. Not even a lowly quad core.agentfred

Thr almighty Cell in the PS3 is an "In Order Processor", making it about as techinally complex as a pentium 1, any PC processor fro the last 3 or 4 years is more powerful than the cell

:lol: Its the most complex processor to program and each of the 6 free cores can be programmed to do different tasks (physics, sounds, explosions). A puny quad core can't touch teh cell.

Are you really this desperate for attention?

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/147220/ibms_cellbased_roadrunner_supercomputer_is_worlds_fastest.html

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/147220/ibms_cellbased_roadrunner_supercomputer_is_worlds_fastest.html

nVidiaGaMer

You and I both know why that doesn't matter, not to mention it has been explained to you several times already. :|

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/147220/ibms_cellbased_roadrunner_supercomputer_is_worlds_fastest.html

nVidiaGaMer

"The machine pulls together the power of 12,240 Cell chips and 6,562 dual-core AMD Opteron processors in IBM QS22 blade servers"
PCWorld

I couldn't find a pic of MGS' environments to compare to the first Crysis shot. There's a gameplay shot of each though.

Do you still think MGS looks better than any PC game?

Do you still think MGS looks better than any PC game?

Saturos3091

Are you asking him to actually compare those pics without his milk-tainted goggles? :o

[QUOTE="Frozzik"]

[QUOTE="MKLOL"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]Not in game. MGS 4 has the best graphics of any game. PC fanboys are denying it. :lol: nVidiaGaMer

From a purely technical point of view i think lots of PC games beat MGS4. Now, to fully apreciate just how good PC games can look you would of course need access to a high spec gaming pc.

The following, ran at high resolution (no laughable 720p and under), minimum of 8xAA, 16xAF and all ingame setting at maximum imho look better "technically" than MGS4. By technically i mean texture resolution, effects, lighting etc etc.

Company of Heroes..........scored 10/10 for graphics under the old review system here on GS.

World in Conflict............... Extremely detailed with loads of fancy lighting and effects going on.

Call of Duty 4 (PC)........... Until you have seen this at high resolution you can never know how good it looks

Bioshock (PC)................. The high levels of AF available on the PC combined with much higher resolutions make this game look awsome at times.

Gears of War (PC).........Same as above

I'm sure people could add more. The fact is the PS3 could never run any of these games, no matter how well optimized they were at maximum ingame graphical settings at 1080p.

There is no vast difference between 720P or 1080P so it doesn't matter. On a small 720P the game looks just as good as on a giant 1080P screen.

actually there's a pretty big difference. look, though i haven't played it, MGS4 looks awesome. nobody is saying otherwise, but Crysis just beats it graphically. and yes, a high end PC is Waaaaaay more powerful than a PS3.

[QUOTE="Saturos3091"]

Do you still think MGS looks better than any PC game?

dgsag

Are you asking him to actually compare those pics without his milk-tainted goggles? :o

What will PC ever get to match MGS4?

Photoshop CS4 is its best bet : )

Vaan7

One word: Crysis

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/147220/ibms_cellbased_roadrunner_supercomputer_is_worlds_fastest.html

Saturos3091

"The machine pulls together the power of 12,240 Cell chips and 6,562 dual-core AMD Opteron processors in IBM QS22 blade servers"
PCWorld

I couldn't find a pic of MGS' environments to compare to the first Crysis shot. There's a gameplay shot of each though.

Do you still think MGS looks better than any PC game?

Crysis has a better jungle and MGS 4 creates a better war zone.

[QUOTE="Saturos3091"]

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/147220/ibms_cellbased_roadrunner_supercomputer_is_worlds_fastest.html

nVidiaGaMer

"The machine pulls together the power of 12,240 Cell chips and 6,562 dual-core AMD Opteron processors in IBM QS22 blade servers"
PCWorld

I couldn't find a pic of MGS' environments to compare to the first Crysis shot. There's a gameplay shot of each though.

Do you still think MGS looks better than any PC game?

Crysis has a better jungle and MGS 4 creates a better war zone.

What is that suppose to mean? The question was which one has better graphics. The obvious answer is Crysis. Technically they don't even come close. Not only are the levels in Crysis larger it still looks better.

[QUOTE="Frozzik"]Its all numbers to me when it comes to specs. All i can say is my PS3 looks good, compared to my gaming pc however games look kinda grainy and jaggies galore. PC is ultra sharp.nVidiaGaMer

MGS 4 looks better then any PC game ...

No, MGS4 looks like crap compared to any PC game. Ever played Crysis in directx 10 mode everything on very high at 1600x1200 with 4x aa? yeah didn't think so, it blows all consoles out of the water. Even ports look better on PC than the original console they came from. Don't fool yourself jsut because you cant afford current PC hardware.

[QUOTE="Frozzik"]

[QUOTE="MKLOL"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]You obviously have never played any PC games on a decent computer over the past couple years or you are just blind to the truth.nVidiaGaMer

From a purely technical point of view i think lots of PC games beat MGS4. Now, to fully apreciate just how good PC games can look you would of course need access to a high spec gaming pc.

The following, ran at high resolution (no laughable 720p and under), minimum of 8xAA, 16xAF and all ingame setting at maximum imho look better "technically" than MGS4. By technically i mean texture resolution, effects, lighting etc etc.

Company of Heroes..........scored 10/10 for graphics under the old review system here on GS.

World in Conflict............... Extremely detailed with loads of fancy lighting and effects going on.

Call of Duty 4 (PC)........... Until you have seen this at high resolution you can never know how good it looks

Bioshock (PC)................. The high levels of AF available on the PC combined with much higher resolutions make this game look awsome at times.

Gears of War (PC).........Same as above

I'm sure people could add more. The fact is the PS3 could never run any of these games, no matter how well optimized they were at maximum ingame graphical settings at 1080p.

There is no vast difference between 720P or 1080P so it doesn't matter. On a small 720P the game looks just as good as on a giant 1080P screen.

Add some image filtering buddy AAx8 or Dx10.

nVidiaGaMer just stop. I own both MGS4 and Crysis. Crysis EASILY Blows MGS4 out of the water. The texture resolution in MGS4 is horrible. Sure the Models in the game are fantastic, there's no denying that, but stop and take a look at a wall and it kills that whole feeling of graphical superiority. Really. MGS4 has great atmosphere and great character models, but in no way does it set a new standard for graphics. I whole-heartedly agree that if you have been gaming on a solid gaming computer for the past 3 yrs or so you can find plenty of games in that span on par with MGS4 graphically. O_Lineman17

NO there isn't. I max COD4 1280x1024 and MGS4 destroys it and COD4 was a contender for best graphics and won best graphics on gametrailers.

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

[QUOTE="Frozzik"]Its all numbers to me when it comes to specs. All i can say is my PS3 looks good, compared to my gaming pc however games look kinda grainy and jaggies galore. PC is ultra sharp.Phazevariance

MGS 4 looks better then any PC game ...

No, MGS4 looks like crap compared to any PC game. Ever played Crysis in directx 10 mode everything on very high at 1600x1200 with 4x aa? yeah didn't think so, it blows all consoles out of the water. Even ports look better on PC than the original console they came from. Don't fool yourself jsut because you cant afford current PC hardware.

My PC is good AMD 3800+ @ 2.7GHz, 2GB RAM, MSI OC 512MB 8800GTS and I played Crysis, COD 4, Unreal Tournament III, and more. And I must say MGS 4 is simply amazing.

I win:

*Crysis img*

Pro_wrestler