This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Elite_Headshotz"]Guess what surpasses them all. An overclocked computer playing Crysis. Beat that.makaveli73
yea sorry i can't beat spending 3000$ to play a game at max settings...
but $500-$600 and low-med settings and crysis is still the best looking game...sorry cows
The PS3 and the CELL WILL get better. Just like the PS2 and the Emotion Engine.Rikusaki
gt3 is still one of the best looking ps2 games, so maybe a bit better but not much better, just all games will be looking like lair/uncharnted in a few years time
you do know that the makers of Uncharted said, their only using 30% power of the ps3 right?
http://gamejonezblog.blogspot.com/2007/11/uncharted-only-tapping-30-of-ps3s-spu.html
their are multiple sites reporting this.
SiKh22
maybe 30% procssing power and 100% ram so that leaves you with very little you can do
[QUOTE="SiKh22"]you do know that the makers of Uncharted said, their only using 30% power of the ps3 right?
http://gamejonezblog.blogspot.com/2007/11/uncharted-only-tapping-30-of-ps3s-spu.html
their are multiple sites reporting this.
imprezawrx500
maybe 30% procssing power and 100% ram so that leaves you with very little you can do
soo....which ps3 dev team do you work for?
[QUOTE="Elite_Headshotz"]Guess what surpasses them all. An overclocked computer playing Crysis. Beat that.makaveli73
yea sorry i can't beat spending 3000$ to play a game at max settings...
You obviously don't know anything about the price of a PC that can surpass ps3 graphically so just don't bother, and trust me, its not $3000.
:roll:
Wishful thinking on the part of an anti PS3 fanboy. Uncharted is far from using all the PS3's potential. It was estimated at only using about 1/3 of the console in fact.
Puckhog04
1/3 of the consoles overall power? or 1/3 of what the cell is capable of? A dev saying this game only uses 1/3 of the consoles power is stupid, I'm sure the cell has not being fully utilized and whether it will or not is something none of us know but games like lair and uncharted will be pushing the gpu hard, take lair for example, the ps3 simply cannot cannot render the game at a consistent framerate fully utilizing the cell isnt going to make a huge difference when it comes to that.
[QUOTE="makaveli73"][QUOTE="Elite_Headshotz"]Guess what surpasses them all. An overclocked computer playing Crysis. Beat that.imprezawrx500
yea sorry i can't beat spending 3000$ to play a game at max settings...
but $500-$600 and low-med settings and crysis is still the best looking game...sorry cows
Crysis at low-med settings isnt even close to being the best looking game thanks for proving you have never played a PS3 .
[QUOTE="imprezawrx500"][QUOTE="makaveli73"][QUOTE="Elite_Headshotz"]Guess what surpasses them all. An overclocked computer playing Crysis. Beat that.Polaris_choice
yea sorry i can't beat spending 3000$ to play a game at max settings...
but $500-$600 and low-med settings and crysis is still the best looking game...sorry cows
Crysis at low-med settings isnt even close to being the best looking game thanks for proving you have never played a PS3 .
You can tweak crysis to look very good on a mid ranged PC, far better than anything on ps3, thanks for proving you have never played a pc game...
PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power....xbox 360 has a ways to go because of the ease of developing, and pc games will continue to be superior because of the 200$ price tag a year to upgrademakaveli73
Whatever helps you sleep better at night.
Your assumptions that"PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power" is a joke though considering you know nothing of development on the PS3 nor do you even know what the Devs are doing in terms of the PS3. In other words, i respect your opinion but it's simply not true. No console has ever been maxed after 1 year and the fact that Uncharted looks better than 99% of the games out there and it's only the PS3's first year means that more is to come. Couple that with the fact that they estimated that Uncharted was using a bit less than 1/3 of the PS3 and, well, you have alot of room for improvement. ;)
[QUOTE="makaveli73"]PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power....xbox 360 has a ways to go because of the ease of developing, and pc games will continue to be superior because of the 200$ price tag a year to upgradePuckhog04
Whatever helps you sleep better at night.
Your assumptions that"PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power" is a joke though considering you know nothing of development on the PS3 nor do you even know what the Devs are doing in terms of the PS3. In other words, i respect your opinion but it's simply not true. No console has ever been maxed after 1 year and the fact that Uncharted looks better than 99% of the games out there and it's only the PS3's first year means that more is to come. Couple that with the fact that they estimated that Uncharted was using a bit less than 1/3 of the PS3 and, well, you have alot of room for improvement. ;)
yes, you are correct. This thread was obviously made by some 360 bot who was trying to defend his/her console. From what I see and from games like Uncharted (said to be the best looking console game and said to have only used up 1/3 of the ps's power by many sites), the ps3 has a long, long waay to go. Can't wait for 4-5 years from now. And from what I see for the xbox 360, the graphics for games have only been going downhill since gears of war. I mean for example, Ninja Gaiden 2 doesn't even look fully next-gen. I think the 360 is the console that is somewhere close to its maximum capacity.
I think so....uncharted look ok but i think it pushs the PS3 to it's limits. i mean the cell will NEVER be fully utilized. xboxs latest update really pushs it past anything PS3 will EVER achieve.makaveli73
BTW, that KOTOR mask itself shows that you are a liar.
[QUOTE="Puckhog04"][QUOTE="makaveli73"]PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power....xbox 360 has a ways to go because of the ease of developing, and pc games will continue to be superior because of the 200$ price tag a year to upgradepuneman1
Whatever helps you sleep better at night.
Your assumptions that"PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power" is a joke though considering you know nothing of development on the PS3 nor do you even know what the Devs are doing in terms of the PS3. In other words, i respect your opinion but it's simply not true. No console has ever been maxed after 1 year and the fact that Uncharted looks better than 99% of the games out there and it's only the PS3's first year means that more is to come. Couple that with the fact that they estimated that Uncharted was using a bit less than 1/3 of the PS3 and, well, you have alot of room for improvement. ;)
yes, you are correct. This thread was obviously made by some 360 bot who was trying to defend his/her console. From what I see and from games like Uncharted (said to be the best looking console game and said to have only used up 1/3 of the ps's power by many sites), the ps3 has a long, long waay to go. Can't wait for 4-5 years from now. And from what I see for the xbox 360, the graphics for games have only been going downhill since gears of war. I mean for example, Ninja Gaiden 2 doesn't even look fully next-gen. I think the 360 is the console that is somewhere close to its maximum capacity.
No, Listen. The reason Uncharted didn't look better and play better was becuase 30% is the MOST the DEVS can get out of the PS3. If after one year they are only capable of 30% than they are not going to get any farther....Uncharted COULD have looked better because of the Sleeping Giant, PS3. Unfortinately for Sony fanboy....that Giant is too hard to awaken for the Dev's.....
[QUOTE="puneman1"][QUOTE="Puckhog04"][QUOTE="makaveli73"]PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power....xbox 360 has a ways to go because of the ease of developing, and pc games will continue to be superior because of the 200$ price tag a year to upgrademakaveli73
Whatever helps you sleep better at night.
Your assumptions that"PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power" is a joke though considering you know nothing of development on the PS3 nor do you even know what the Devs are doing in terms of the PS3. In other words, i respect your opinion but it's simply not true. No console has ever been maxed after 1 year and the fact that Uncharted looks better than 99% of the games out there and it's only the PS3's first year means that more is to come. Couple that with the fact that they estimated that Uncharted was using a bit less than 1/3 of the PS3 and, well, you have alot of room for improvement. ;)
yes, you are correct. This thread was obviously made by some 360 bot who was trying to defend his/her console. From what I see and from games like Uncharted (said to be the best looking console game and said to have only used up 1/3 of the ps's power by many sites), the ps3 has a long, long waay to go. Can't wait for 4-5 years from now. And from what I see for the xbox 360, the graphics for games have only been going downhill since gears of war. I mean for example, Ninja Gaiden 2 doesn't even look fully next-gen. I think the 360 is the console that is somewhere close to its maximum capacity.
No, Listen. The reason Uncharted didn't look better and play better was becuase 30% is the MOST the DEVS can get out of the PS3. If after one year they are only capable of 30% than they are not going to get any farther....Uncharted COULD have looked better because of the Sleeping Giant, PS3. Unfortinately for Sony fanboy....that Giant is too hard to awaken for the Dev's.....
Dude, from your first post itself, I know that you are just nothing but a hard-core xboxist. I mean you said that "Uncharted was O;K; looking" WTF, everyone is saying its one of the best looking console games out there. And two or more years the ps3 will just hover over all the other consoles in terms of graphics. I mean look at the graphics for the ps2 in 2001 and in 2007. The cell processor is relatively new. Once, game developers discover the true power of it. BAMMMMMMMM
[QUOTE="puneman1"][QUOTE="Puckhog04"][QUOTE="makaveli73"]PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power....xbox 360 has a ways to go because of the ease of developing, and pc games will continue to be superior because of the 200$ price tag a year to upgrademakaveli73
Whatever helps you sleep better at night.
Your assumptions that"PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power" is a joke though considering you know nothing of development on the PS3 nor do you even know what the Devs are doing in terms of the PS3. In other words, i respect your opinion but it's simply not true. No console has ever been maxed after 1 year and the fact that Uncharted looks better than 99% of the games out there and it's only the PS3's first year means that more is to come. Couple that with the fact that they estimated that Uncharted was using a bit less than 1/3 of the PS3 and, well, you have alot of room for improvement. ;)
yes, you are correct. This thread was obviously made by some 360 bot who was trying to defend his/her console. From what I see and from games like Uncharted (said to be the best looking console game and said to have only used up 1/3 of the ps's power by many sites), the ps3 has a long, long waay to go. Can't wait for 4-5 years from now. And from what I see for the xbox 360, the graphics for games have only been going downhill since gears of war. I mean for example, Ninja Gaiden 2 doesn't even look fully next-gen. I think the 360 is the console that is somewhere close to its maximum capacity.
No, Listen. The reason Uncharted didn't look better and play better was becuase 30% is the MOST the DEVS can get out of the PS3. If after one year they are only capable of 30% than they are not going to get any farther....Uncharted COULD have looked better because of the Sleeping Giant, PS3. Unfortinately for Sony fanboy....that Giant is too hard to awaken for the Dev's.....
but you said the ps3 is maxed out.... dont change the story now. im sorry but the PS3 is proving that console games will be close to pc games real soon
[QUOTE="makaveli73"][QUOTE="puneman1"][QUOTE="Puckhog04"][QUOTE="makaveli73"]PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power....xbox 360 has a ways to go because of the ease of developing, and pc games will continue to be superior because of the 200$ price tag a year to upgradexboxps2cube
Whatever helps you sleep better at night.
Your assumptions that"PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power" is a joke though considering you know nothing of development on the PS3 nor do you even know what the Devs are doing in terms of the PS3. In other words, i respect your opinion but it's simply not true. No console has ever been maxed after 1 year and the fact that Uncharted looks better than 99% of the games out there and it's only the PS3's first year means that more is to come. Couple that with the fact that they estimated that Uncharted was using a bit less than 1/3 of the PS3 and, well, you have alot of room for improvement. ;)
yes, you are correct. This thread was obviously made by some 360 bot who was trying to defend his/her console. From what I see and from games like Uncharted (said to be the best looking console game and said to have only used up 1/3 of the ps's power by many sites), the ps3 has a long, long waay to go. Can't wait for 4-5 years from now. And from what I see for the xbox 360, the graphics for games have only been going downhill since gears of war. I mean for example, Ninja Gaiden 2 doesn't even look fully next-gen. I think the 360 is the console that is somewhere close to its maximum capacity.
No, Listen. The reason Uncharted didn't look better and play better was becuase 30% is the MOST the DEVS can get out of the PS3. If after one year they are only capable of 30% than they are not going to get any farther....Uncharted COULD have looked better because of the Sleeping Giant, PS3. Unfortinately for Sony fanboy....that Giant is too hard to awaken for the Dev's.....
but you said the ps3 is maxed out.... dont change the story now. im sorry but the PS3 is proving that console games will be close to pc games real soon
it's maxed out in terms that graphics will not improve
[QUOTE="Puckhog04"][QUOTE="makaveli73"]PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power....xbox 360 has a ways to go because of the ease of developing, and pc games will continue to be superior because of the 200$ price tag a year to upgradepuneman1
Whatever helps you sleep better at night.
Your assumptions that"PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power" is a joke though considering you know nothing of development on the PS3 nor do you even know what the Devs are doing in terms of the PS3. In other words, i respect your opinion but it's simply not true. No console has ever been maxed after 1 year and the fact that Uncharted looks better than 99% of the games out there and it's only the PS3's first year means that more is to come. Couple that with the fact that they estimated that Uncharted was using a bit less than 1/3 of the PS3 and, well, you have alot of room for improvement. ;)
yes, you are correct. This thread was obviously made by some 360 bot who was trying to defend his/her console. From what I see and from games like Uncharted (said to be the best looking console game and said to have only used up 1/3 of the ps's power by many sites), the ps3 has a long, long waay to go. Can't wait for 4-5 years from now. And from what I see for the xbox 360, the graphics for games have only been going downhill since gears of war. I mean for example, Ninja Gaiden 2 doesn't even look fully next-gen. I think the 360 is the console that is somewhere close to its maximum capacity.
the reason the 360 games are going downhill in terms of graphics because the dev's got everything laying in their lap they can be lazy and get away with just updating a few textures here and there, damn we wont talk about games like double agent that was the sloppiest uneven game i seen in a while, i rather have the whole game look ugly than some parts next gen some not. games are being built ground up for ps3 so we will see a change.... but everybody is right, i have not seen a better looking game than Gears on 360 yet and thats sad.
[QUOTE="makaveli73"][QUOTE="puneman1"][QUOTE="Puckhog04"][QUOTE="makaveli73"]PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power....xbox 360 has a ways to go because of the ease of developing, and pc games will continue to be superior because of the 200$ price tag a year to upgradexboxps2cube
Whatever helps you sleep better at night.
Your assumptions that"PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power" is a joke though considering you know nothing of development on the PS3 nor do you even know what the Devs are doing in terms of the PS3. In other words, i respect your opinion but it's simply not true. No console has ever been maxed after 1 year and the fact that Uncharted looks better than 99% of the games out there and it's only the PS3's first year means that more is to come. Couple that with the fact that they estimated that Uncharted was using a bit less than 1/3 of the PS3 and, well, you have alot of room for improvement. ;)
yes, you are correct. This thread was obviously made by some 360 bot who was trying to defend his/her console. From what I see and from games like Uncharted (said to be the best looking console game and said to have only used up 1/3 of the ps's power by many sites), the ps3 has a long, long waay to go. Can't wait for 4-5 years from now. And from what I see for the xbox 360, the graphics for games have only been going downhill since gears of war. I mean for example, Ninja Gaiden 2 doesn't even look fully next-gen. I think the 360 is the console that is somewhere close to its maximum capacity.
No, Listen. The reason Uncharted didn't look better and play better was becuase 30% is the MOST the DEVS can get out of the PS3. If after one year they are only capable of 30% than they are not going to get any farther....Uncharted COULD have looked better because of the Sleeping Giant, PS3. Unfortinately for Sony fanboy....that Giant is too hard to awaken for the Dev's.....
but you said the ps3 is maxed out.... dont change the story now. im sorry but the PS3 is proving that console games will be close to pc games real soon
Makaveli73... I think you kinda got burned. Don't try to change things now. tsch tsch tsch
[QUOTE="xboxps2cube"][QUOTE="makaveli73"][QUOTE="puneman1"][QUOTE="Puckhog04"][QUOTE="makaveli73"]PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power....xbox 360 has a ways to go because of the ease of developing, and pc games will continue to be superior because of the 200$ price tag a year to upgradepuneman1
Whatever helps you sleep better at night.
Your assumptions that"PS3's graphics should be maxed because of dev's not being able to harness the power" is a joke though considering you know nothing of development on the PS3 nor do you even know what the Devs are doing in terms of the PS3. In other words, i respect your opinion but it's simply not true. No console has ever been maxed after 1 year and the fact that Uncharted looks better than 99% of the games out there and it's only the PS3's first year means that more is to come. Couple that with the fact that they estimated that Uncharted was using a bit less than 1/3 of the PS3 and, well, you have alot of room for improvement. ;)
yes, you are correct. This thread was obviously made by some 360 bot who was trying to defend his/her console. From what I see and from games like Uncharted (said to be the best looking console game and said to have only used up 1/3 of the ps's power by many sites), the ps3 has a long, long waay to go. Can't wait for 4-5 years from now. And from what I see for the xbox 360, the graphics for games have only been going downhill since gears of war. I mean for example, Ninja Gaiden 2 doesn't even look fully next-gen. I think the 360 is the console that is somewhere close to its maximum capacity.
No, Listen. The reason Uncharted didn't look better and play better was becuase 30% is the MOST the DEVS can get out of the PS3. If after one year they are only capable of 30% than they are not going to get any farther....Uncharted COULD have looked better because of the Sleeping Giant, PS3. Unfortinately for Sony fanboy....that Giant is too hard to awaken for the Dev's.....
but you said the ps3 is maxed out.... dont change the story now. im sorry but the PS3 is proving that console games will be close to pc games real soon
Makaveli73... I think you kinda got burned. Don't try to change things now. tsch tsch tsch
No because it's TRUE. the PS3 is MAXED OUT. 30% is the most they will EVER get out of it.....1 year and they can only get 30%....thats sad.
No because it's TRUE. the PS3 is MAXED OUT. 30% is the most they will EVER get out of it.....1 year and they can only get 30%....thats sad.makaveli73
So by your logic, the 360 is maxed out since it can't produce better graphics than Gears of War and whenever it tries to have huge enviroments, it has to sacrifice resolution, graphics, or worse, framerate. :|
The PS3 isn't maxed out, nor is any other console/system. If anything, as an example, compare the PS2's launch and the year after that to the 2005 and 06 games. Huge difference there.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment