PS3 has no game (till the end of the year)

PS3 has no games but the 360 has more rehashed sequels and the Wii U has another Mario rehash, old multiplats and a couple decent launch titles. I don't see anything to brag about from console owners. It'll be funny when Lems especially go back to exclusives don't matter next year in 2013 when The Last Of US etc... come out. FlamesOfGrey

PS3 has no games but the 360 has more rehashed sequels and the Wii U has another Mario rehash, old multiplats and a couple decent launch titles. I don't see anything to brag about from console owners. It'll be funny when Lems especially go back to exclusives don't matter next year in 2013 when The Last Of US etc... come out. FlamesOfGrey

Someone's mad both Dance Central games and Gunstringer outscored PS3s top selling exclusive. I guess that confirms Kinect > PS3JohnnyCageMK

You're a dangerous kid. You could kill somebody from all the laughter until they run out of breath and die... Just stop it. :lol:

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Remind me where I said flop equaled a bad game? We all know what flop means. I'll write it in big caps. A FLOP IS A GAME THAT DID NOT MEET EXPECTATIONS.

Twisted Metal and Starhawk are flops. End of story. They are both sitting in the mid-70's on metacritic, which by gaming standards, its terribly average.

And I own all the systems. Keep thinking I don't own a PS3. Won't make it true.

RR360DD

You are using the term flop to try and deem PS3 games as being bad, you are misusing it on purpose, both you and Johnny. I don't care if a game flops in SW or not, I only care about my own personal enjoyment of a game. If it flops then so what? I don't care. And 70 is not average, it is good. 50 would be the average.

They are disappointing games. If you enjoy them, good for you. But they have been rated as mid-70s games, which in gaming journalism is most definitely average. Very few games journalists make full use of the 10 point scale.

70 is not a bad score regardless, like I said though I do not care. I only care about my own opinion for games, if you happen to disagree with them then go ahead. But you can't really make an opinion on them because you never played them before, nor will you ever be able to because you only have a 360.

When you are stuck with something that wasn't your choice, you try to convince yourself that you are happy with it, you try to make the best of what was given to you. That is just human nature, the more one spends with something, the more they try to justify it, especially when they regret it.

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

[QUOTE="charizard1605"] Resorting to personal insults is the best way to admit you lost an argument ;) It's okay, maybe Sony will do better next year. If the Wii U doesn't blow them out of the water, that is.clone01

Indeed it is, Drone.

Indeed it is...

You still trolling? Do you have any proof that Kuraimen doesn't own a PS3 yet? No? Thought not.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Bad thread is bad. PS3 has had more exclusives than any other system this year. Star Hawk, Twisted Metal, Journey, PS All Stars, LBP Karting. And it's getting the same multiplats too as 360/PC too.

JohnnyCageMK

Flop, Flop, Good but 4 hours long LOL, Not exclusive and certain flop, and finally meh, its a kart racing game.

But oh, whats this, a cow actually mentioning multiplats?! :lol: Now I know things are getting desparate.

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"]PS3 has no games but the 360 has more rehashed sequels and the Wii U has another Mario rehash, old multiplats and a couple decent launch titles. I don't see anything to brag about from console owners. It'll be funny when Lems especially go back to exclusives don't matter next year in 2013 when The Last Of US etc... come out. JohnnyCageMK

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

You are using the term flop to try and deem PS3 games as being bad, you are misusing it on purpose, both you and Johnny. I don't care if a game flops in SW or not, I only care about my own personal enjoyment of a game. If it flops then so what? I don't care. And 70 is not average, it is good. 50 would be the average.

ShadowMoses900

They are disappointing games. If you enjoy them, good for you. But they have been rated as mid-70s games, which in gaming journalism is most definitely average. Very few games journalists make full use of the 10 point scale.

70 is not a bad score regardless, like I said though I do not care. I only care about my own opinion for games, if you happen to disagree with them then go ahead. But you can't really make an opinion on them because you never played them before, nor will you ever be able to because you only have a 360.

When you are stuck with something that wasn't your choice, you try to convince yourself that you are happy with it, you try to make the best of what was given to you. That is just human nature, the more one spends with something, the more they try to justify it, especially when they regret it.

I don't disagree though, I AGREE with gaming journalists that the games are average :lol:

Its you who disagrees, which is cool. If you enjoy those 70 rated games, more power to you!

I think ill save my money for higher quality games though.

And Microsoft's is so much better...yet another Halo and Forza lol

[QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"]PS3 has no games but the 360 has more rehashed sequels and the Wii U has another Mario rehash, old multiplats and a couple decent launch titles. I don't see anything to brag about from console owners. It'll be funny when Lems especially go back to exclusives don't matter next year in 2013 when The Last Of US etc... come out. FlamesOfGrey

Gears of war is spring, and forza 5 platform has't been announced yet.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

They are disappointing games. If you enjoy them, good for you. But they have been rated as mid-70s games, which in gaming journalism is most definitely average. Very few games journalists make full use of the 10 point scale.

RR360DD

70 is not a bad score regardless, like I said though I do not care. I only care about my own opinion for games, if you happen to disagree with them then go ahead. But you can't really make an opinion on them because you never played them before, nor will you ever be able to because you only have a 360.

When you are stuck with something that wasn't your choice, you try to convince yourself that you are happy with it, you try to make the best of what was given to you. That is just human nature, the more one spends with something, the more they try to justify it, especially when they regret it.

I don't disagree though, I AGREE with gaming journalists that the games are average :lol:

Its you who disagrees, which is cool. If you enjoy those 70 rated games, more power to you!

I think ill save my money for higher quality games though.

It's kind of sad seeing all the cows getting slaughtered ITT by low level bottom feeder trolls. Just accept the ownage. This year has been bad for PS3. End of story.

Next year looks great though, so you'll get your retribution

[QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"]PS3 has no games but the 360 has more rehashed sequels and the Wii U has another Mario rehash, old multiplats and a couple decent launch titles. I don't see anything to brag about from console owners. It'll be funny when Lems especially go back to exclusives don't matter next year in 2013 when The Last Of US etc... come out. FlamesOfGrey

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"] Considering 720 comes out next year I don't think anyone will care about Last of Us which will be last gen by then.RR360DD

Gears of war is spring, and forza 5 platform has't been announced yet.

You still trolling? Do you have any proof that Kuraimen doesn't own a PS3 yet? No? Thought not.Obviously_Right

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

They are disappointing games. If you enjoy them, good for you. But they have been rated as mid-70s games, which in gaming journalism is most definitely average. Very few games journalists make full use of the 10 point scale.

RR360DD

70 is not a bad score regardless, like I said though I do not care. I only care about my own opinion for games, if you happen to disagree with them then go ahead. But you can't really make an opinion on them because you never played them before, nor will you ever be able to because you only have a 360.

When you are stuck with something that wasn't your choice, you try to convince yourself that you are happy with it, you try to make the best of what was given to you. That is just human nature, the more one spends with something, the more they try to justify it, especially when they regret it.

I don't disagree though, I AGREE with gaming journalists that the games are average :lol:

Its you who disagrees, which is cool. If you enjoy those 70 rated games, more power to you!

I think ill save my money for higher quality games though.

So you are saying that you let other people dictate what you like? Ok, hope you are not a registered voter.

I disagree with the Star Hawk review, it should have been lower. Twisted Metal I gave an 8.5, everything about it is great BUT the online has matchmaking issues. That and it's campaign is too short, but it's gameplay it's self is perfect.

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"] Considering 720 comes out next year I don't think anyone will care about Last of Us which will be last gen by then.JohnnyCageMK

When was this confirmed since you say it so definitively.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Xbox 720 coming out the same year that Forza 5 and Gears Of War Judgement will be releasing on 360? I don't see it. Wrong, I think it's safe to say The Last Of Us will be a Game Of The Year contender for 2013 so, millions of people and gaming journalists will care.FlamesOfGrey

Gears of war is spring, and forza 5 platform has't been announced yet.

You forgot the Wii TC.
Heres upcoming games for the Wii.

'Disney Princess: My fairytale adventure', 'Just Dance 4', 'We sing the 80's', 'Fit Music, Andrew Lloyd Webber Musicals: Sing and Dance', 'Everyone Sing', 'Country Dance Musical Specia'l, 'The Hip Hop Dance Experience'...and a few multiplatforms.

You forgot the Wii TC.
Heres upcoming games for the Wii.

'Disney Princess: My fairytale adventure', 'Just Dance 4', 'We sing the 80's', 'Fit Music, Andrew Lloyd Webber Musicals: Sing and Dance', 'Everyone Sing', 'Country Dance Musical Specia'l, 'The Hip Hop Dance Experience'...and a few multiplatforms.

g0ddyX

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

70 is not a bad score regardless, like I said though I do not care. I only care about my own opinion for games, if you happen to disagree with them then go ahead. But you can't really make an opinion on them because you never played them before, nor will you ever be able to because you only have a 360.

When you are stuck with something that wasn't your choice, you try to convince yourself that you are happy with it, you try to make the best of what was given to you. That is just human nature, the more one spends with something, the more they try to justify it, especially when they regret it.

ShadowMoses900

I don't disagree though, I AGREE with gaming journalists that the games are average :lol:

Its you who disagrees, which is cool. If you enjoy those 70 rated games, more power to you!

I think ill save my money for higher quality games though.

So you are saying that you let other people dictate what you like? Ok, hope you are not a registered voter.

I disagree with the Star Hawk review, it should have been lower. Twisted Metal I gave an 8.5, everything about it is great BUT the online has matchmaking issues. That and it's campaign is too short, but it's gameplay it's self is perfect.

I respect other peoples opinions. I own warhawk, which I found to be a mediocre shooter, there are far better multiplayer shooters for me to play so why waste my time with that? So I wasn't interested in starhawk at all. And with some fans saying its worse than warhawk? LOL no thanks. I don't need to play it to know I won't be interested.

Twisted metal, not interested in car combat games, not to mention Ive read loads of reports about the online just being broken. No thanks.

So no, I have my own opinions on these games. Still doesn't change the fact they received an average reception, and were considered flops here on system wars.

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]You still trolling? Do you have any proof that Kuraimen doesn't own a PS3 yet? No? Thought not.clone01

Still no proof?...what an idiot...even for a troll.

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

Sigh do people even do research anymore? i mean really?

PS3 has:

• Ratchet and Clank: Full Force
• LBP:Karting
• One Piece
• Mugen Souls
• Killzone Collection
• Okami HD
• PS AllStars

Thats a pretty good lineup since i shall be getting 4 out of the 7 i just listed.. TC if ur gonna troll at least do something good and not something that would make you look stupid no offense

Nanomage

Wait what? you want more? :lol:.. use ur head fanboy because if lems are satisfied with a yearly released shooter, a milked racing game and a bunch of multiplats im pretty sure cows also have the right to be satisfied with a new karting game, a new fighting game, new RPG's, HD collections and a bunch of multiplats too ;)

lord, if lems are all like this then no wonder MS cant and wont produce more than the usual 3 exclusives every year :lol:

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Gears of war is spring, and forza 5 platform has't been announced yet.

JohnnyCageMK

Xbox 360 was the first console to launch for this current generation so by default it'll have a huge following being first to show case "Next Generation". The Wii U while not really "True Next Generation" depending on your viewpoint has that position now. Both Sony and Microsoft will have to bring big launch titles out with their new consoles especially since I expect their console to be more powerful and expensive then the Wii U. Launching the Next Xbox in 2014 with say Halo 5 at launch is a MUCH better path to follow then launching with Forza 5 and some multiplats. That's just my opinion on it. We'll find out next year.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Xbox 720 coming out the same year that Forza 5 and Gears Of War Judgement will be releasing on 360? I don't see it. Wrong, I think it's safe to say The Last Of Us will be a Game Of The Year contender for 2013 so, millions of people and gaming journalists will care.FlamesOfGrey

Gears of war is spring, and forza 5 platform has't been announced yet.

Its the biggest that we know of so far, and has a spring launch window meaning nowhere near the christmas holiday when the new xbox will be launching. Forza 5 being a lunch title is a possibility, it doesn't need to carry the console launch.

[QUOTE="kyacat"][QUOTE="MrYaotubo"] First of all most of the PC/360 multiplats aren´t being released on the PS3 like The Witcher 2,Minecraft,Mark of the Ninja,etc,and as far as exclusives go it´s miles behind the PC,I mean between Shogun 2 Fall of the Samurai,Civ Gods and Kings,Diablo 3,Torchlight 2,Planetside 2,Hawken,WoW Mists of Pandaria,FTL,Legend of Grimrock,Orcs Must Die 2,Sins of a Solar Empire Rebbelion,Tribes Ascend,Wargame European Escalation,Crusader Kings 2 and so many more,all of them with scores of 8 and above both on GS and on meta,and you want to compare that pitiful list of the PS3 to the (incomplete)PC lineup? :lol:MrYaotubo

I do have proof, but the onus isn't on me to provide it, its on you, troll.

Still no proof?...what an idiot...even for a troll.

Obviously_Right

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]Halo isn't a yearly release, and no where near as milked as Ratchet and Clank (and yeah, Im a R&C fan)

Enjoy your collections and HD versions of last gen games we all beat years ago :lol:

RR360DD

By your logic, movies on DVD were released again on Blu-ray are milkage. Now don't be stupid...

It's because those games are classics and critically acclaimed, so people would like to play them in HD with 60fps again because they are great games. This is because PlayStation consoles had games and the Xbox didn't. You have no collections because Xbox didn't get any decent games. Deal with it.

I didn't say the HD versions or collections were milkage, I said the Ratchet and Clank series was. :lol: Learn to read

"It's because those games are classics and critically acclaimed, so people would like to play them in HD with 60fps again because they are great games"

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Killzone? Classic? Critically acclaimed?

:lol: :lol: lol: :lol: :lol:

Of course they are. What is wrong with you...?

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

By your logic, movies on DVD were released again on Blu-ray are milkage. Now don't be stupid...

It's because those games are classics and critically acclaimed, so people would like to play them in HD with 60fps again because they are great games. This is because PlayStation consoles had games and the Xbox didn't. You have no collections because Xbox didn't get any decent games. Deal with it.

GamerwillzPS

I didn't say the HD versions or collections were milkage, I said the Ratchet and Clank series was. :lol: Learn to read

"It's because those games are classics and critically acclaimed, so people would like to play them in HD with 60fps again because they are great games"

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Killzone? Classic? Critically acclaimed?

:lol: :lol: lol: :lol: :lol:

Of course they are. What is wrong with you...?

critical acclaim is 90 or higher....i dont think killzone and R&C are 90 or higher

PS3 haz no game hehe

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

By your logic, movies on DVD were released again on Blu-ray are milkage. Now don't be stupid...

It's because those games are classics and critically acclaimed, so people would like to play them in HD with 60fps again because they are great games. This is because PlayStation consoles had games and the Xbox didn't. You have no collections because Xbox didn't get any decent games. Deal with it.

GamerwillzPS

I didn't say the HD versions or collections were milkage, I said the Ratchet and Clank series was. :lol: Learn to read

"It's because those games are classics and critically acclaimed, so people would like to play them in HD with 60fps again because they are great games"

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Killzone? Classic? Critically acclaimed?

:lol: :lol: lol: :lol: :lol:

Of course they are. What is wrong with you...?

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

By your logic, movies on DVD were released again on Blu-ray are milkage. Now don't be stupid...

It's because those games are classics and critically acclaimed, so people would like to play them in HD with 60fps again because they are great games. This is because PlayStation consoles had games and the Xbox didn't. You have no collections because Xbox didn't get any decent games. Deal with it.

GamerwillzPS

I didn't say the HD versions or collections were milkage, I said the Ratchet and Clank series was. :lol: Learn to read

"It's because those games are classics and critically acclaimed, so people would like to play them in HD with 60fps again because they are great games"

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Killzone? Classic? Critically acclaimed?

:lol: :lol: lol: :lol: :lol:

Of course they are. What is wrong with you...?

That was more in reference to Killzone 1, which got completely dogged :lol: 70 on metacritic

Killzone 2 is the best of the bunch. Killzone 3 is 84 on metacritic.

So no, no where near being classics. Just a series that struck lucky with number 2.

I love the smell of burning cow in the morning

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

I didn't say the HD versions or collections were milkage, I said the Ratchet and Clank series was. :lol: Learn to read

"It's because those games are classics and critically acclaimed, so people would like to play them in HD with 60fps again because they are great games"

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Killzone? Classic? Critically acclaimed?

:lol: :lol: lol: :lol: :lol:

Mario1331

Of course they are. What is wrong with you...?

critical acclaim is 90 or higher....i dont think killzone and R&C are 90 or higher

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Of course they are. What is wrong with you...?

FlamesOfGrey

critical acclaim is 90 or higher....i dont think killzone and R&C are 90 or higher

Yeah they do have critical acclaim... but cIassics? :lol:

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Mario1331"]

critical acclaim is 90 or higher....i dont think killzone and R&C are 90 or higher

Wiimotefan

Yeah they do have critical acclaim... but cIassics? :lol:

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

I didn't say the HD versions or collections were milkage, I said the Ratchet and Clank series was. :lol: Learn to read

"It's because those games are classics and critically acclaimed, so people would like to play them in HD with 60fps again because they are great games"

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Killzone? Classic? Critically acclaimed?

:lol: :lol: lol: :lol: :lol:

RR360DD

Of course they are. What is wrong with you...?

That was more in reference to Killzone 1, which got completely dogged :lol: 70 on metacritic

Killzone 2 is the best of the bunch. Killzone 3 is 84 on metacritic.

So no, no where near being classics. Just a series that struck lucky with number 2.

What you are saying doesn't matter and is not true.

The series had huge sales and is critically acclaimed. That's why Sony is releasing Killzone Trilogy because they are classics that nobody will forget.

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Of course they are. What is wrong with you...?

FlamesOfGrey

critical acclaim is 90 or higher....i dont think killzone and R&C are 90 or higher

well i dont know what requirements is needed to be critically acclaimed for a series. to be fair i would say most games have to be 90 or higher. so to me they arent doesnt stop me from actually liking them though

^classic^

I love the smell of burning cow in the morning

spiderluck

I love the smell of burning lemming in the morning.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Of course they are. What is wrong with you...?

GamerwillzPS

That was more in reference to Killzone 1, which got completely dogged :lol: 70 on metacritic

Killzone 2 is the best of the bunch. Killzone 3 is 84 on metacritic.

So no, no where near being classics. Just a series that struck lucky with number 2.

What you are saying doesn't matter and is not true.

The series had huge sales and is critically acclaimed. That's why Sony is releasing Killzone Trilogy because they are classics that nobody will forget.

:lol:

The first Killzone didn't even break 1 million, and the sequals are around 2 million each. Huge sales? No :lol:

Sony is releasing them in a collection because that is what Sony does best. They should rename the console the collectionstation.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Of course they are. What is wrong with you...?

GamerwillzPS

That was more in reference to Killzone 1, which got completely dogged :lol: 70 on metacritic

Killzone 2 is the best of the bunch. Killzone 3 is 84 on metacritic.

So no, no where near being classics. Just a series that struck lucky with number 2.

What you are saying doesn't matter and is not true.

The series had huge sales and is critically acclaimed. That's why Sony is releasing Killzone Trilogy because they are classics that nobody will forget.

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"] I do have proof, but the onus isn't on me to provide it, its on you, troll.

Still no proof?...what an idiot...even for a troll.

clone01

lol he evidently feels that he doesn't have to prove anything to you, probably because he doesn't take the Internet as seriously as you do, troll.

I mean seriously, making queries? :lol: What are you doing with your life apart from trolling?

^classic^

laus_basic

:lol: brilliant