PS3 is superior than the 360

  • 115 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#51 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

Dont know if Im totally with the OP here...BUT I will say that I bought a 360 at launch. It died on me 8 months later and was thrown in the trash. I bought another one and its been in for repair 4x now.

I have since gave my 360 to my boys. I could care less about it. Dont care even if they delete my games, themes ect..Just dont care. MS about killed my love of gaming with their junk. And I have been gaming since 1981 at the age of 10.

I just purchased the PS3 and a few games/ and movies....I have to say SONY has reassured me that gaming is still alive, innovative and ready to move me ahead in the hobby I love so dearly. The second I plugged it in I was in heaven. From the dashboard to the free online to HOME..I dont see me being unhappy in the near future. Especially since buying a DreamGear controller that is identical to the 360 controller.

I was a MS supporter from day one standing in line "1st" in line...for the Xbox in 01...THen "1st" in line for the 360...BOTH times waiting for 9 hours. Buying tons of games, controllers, even LIVE when it was first introduced. NOW...I simply hope they die and someone else takes their place....ie..."apple,sega?"

Thank you SONY for giving me back my true love and passion for gaming...

LEGEND_C4A

Give me a break :|:roll:

NO give me a break. You read my story. I gave MS a chance for 9 years. The XBOX was a beast. I loved it. BUT the 360 has done nothing but disapoint me time and time again. Making me scared to even turn it on. And once it is on it sounds like a train rolling down the tracks. Yes the 360 has some good games. BUT its not enough to make me stay with them.

Avatar image for Bus-A-Bus
Bus-A-Bus

5089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Bus-A-Bus
Member since 2009 • 5089 Posts

The funny thing is that rsx is not clocked at 550 mhz,its 500 mhz,it was down clocked.Flops are not the way to compare systems abilities,its actually very wrong.Both consoles are different in architecture and 215GFLOPS from Cell(7*SPES and one ppu) and that is where theoretical and real life power deffer.That "math" is pretty much biased towards to ps,if you think otherwise you dont know anything about ps3 and 360.If you compare it then you can remove one spu(25 GFLOPS) because its reserved for OS and you can remove ppu(40 GFLOPS) because you dont use it the same way like 360,in 360 you actually use all ppu and program them for tasks you want in ps3 ppu shouldnt count as that because that ppu is reserved to give tasks for spus,because they dont have access to memory so you cant program them to do your tasks but rather program ppu to give them work.Emotion Engine(270mhz) had 2 times more FLOPS then Pentium 3 733mhz,and xbox used Celeron 733 mhz,look how it ended...

That leaves ps3 150GFLOPS vs 360s 115 GFLOPS but then you see that ps3 has to use some spus for helping rsx and thats why all educated people say they are equal.And yea about rsx vs xenos,there is no comparison,xenos overpowers rsx in EVERY situation,48 vs 24 pipelines(it was said that those unified pipelines may not be as good as those FIVE years ago,but now when every gfx card is unified we sure know)?same clockspeed,2 times more triangles,10 mg of EDRAM,memexport...list goes on.They are pretty much,and btw those specs are 5 yrs old...

Avatar image for MizFitAwesome
MizFitAwesome

2745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 MizFitAwesome
Member since 2009 • 2745 Posts

[QUOTE="LEGEND_C4A"]

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

Dont know if Im totally with the OP here...BUT I will say that I bought a 360 at launch. It died on me 8 months later and was thrown in the trash. I bought another one and its been in for repair 4x now.

I have since gave my 360 to my boys. I could care less about it. Dont care even if they delete my games, themes ect..Just dont care. MS about killed my love of gaming with their junk. And I have been gaming since 1981 at the age of 10.

I just purchased the PS3 and a few games/ and movies....I have to say SONY has reassured me that gaming is still alive, innovative and ready to move me ahead in the hobby I love so dearly. The second I plugged it in I was in heaven. From the dashboard to the free online to HOME..I dont see me being unhappy in the near future. Especially since buying a DreamGear controller that is identical to the 360 controller.

I was a MS supporter from day one standing in line "1st" in line...for the Xbox in 01...THen "1st" in line for the 360...BOTH times waiting for 9 hours. Buying tons of games, controllers, even LIVE when it was first introduced. NOW...I simply hope they die and someone else takes their place....ie..."apple,sega?"

Thank you SONY for giving me back my true love and passion for gaming...

VanDammFan

Give me a break :|:roll:

NO give me a break. You read my story. I gave MS a chance for 9 years. The XBOX was a beast. I loved it. BUT the 360 has done nothing but disapoint me time and time again. Making me scared to even turn it on. And once it is on it sounds like a train rolling down the tracks. Yes the 360 has some good games. BUT its not enough to make me stay with them.

Cool Story bro....../sarcasm bBTW, the original Xbox launched Nov 2001, the brand hasn't been around for 9 years...

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#54 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts
[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

Dont know if Im totally with the OP here...BUT I will say that I bought a 360 at launch. It died on me 8 months later and was thrown in the trash. I bought another one and its been in for repair 4x now.

I have since gave my 360 to my boys. I could care less about it. Dont care even if they delete my games, themes ect..Just dont care. MS about killed my love of gaming with their junk. And I have been gaming since 1981 at the age of 10.

I just purchased the PS3 and a few games/ and movies....I have to say SONY has reassured me that gaming is still alive, innovative and ready to move me ahead in the hobby I love so dearly. The second I plugged it in I was in heaven. From the dashboard to the free online to HOME..I dont see me being unhappy in the near future. Especially since buying a DreamGear controller that is identical to the 360 controller.

I was a MS supporter from day one standing in line "1st" in line...for the Xbox in 01...THen "1st" in line for the 360...BOTH times waiting for 9 hours. Buying tons of games, controllers, even LIVE when it was first introduced. NOW...I simply hope they die and someone else takes their place....ie..."apple,sega?"

Thank you SONY for giving me back my true love and passion for gaming...

Nyxathid_Horror
Here is the real thread winner.

So a weird melodramatic post about a videogame console having the power to kill one's love for gaming and being in "heaven" (maybe he was talking about some kind of erotic nirvana? it's perfectly possible in the context of his post) via electronic device "wins"? If this post is any standard of quality, maybe I should enter of my angsty melodramatic high school poetry into some serious contests.
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#55 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="LEGEND_C4A"]

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

Dont know if Im totally with the OP here...BUT I will say that I bought a 360 at launch. It died on me 8 months later and was thrown in the trash. I bought another one and its been in for repair 4x now.

I have since gave my 360 to my boys. I could care less about it. Dont care even if they delete my games, themes ect..Just dont care. MS about killed my love of gaming with their junk. And I have been gaming since 1981 at the age of 10.

I just purchased the PS3 and a few games/ and movies....I have to say SONY has reassured me that gaming is still alive, innovative and ready to move me ahead in the hobby I love so dearly. The second I plugged it in I was in heaven. From the dashboard to the free online to HOME..I dont see me being unhappy in the near future. Especially since buying a DreamGear controller that is identical to the 360 controller.

I was a MS supporter from day one standing in line "1st" in line...for the Xbox in 01...THen "1st" in line for the 360...BOTH times waiting for 9 hours. Buying tons of games, controllers, even LIVE when it was first introduced. NOW...I simply hope they die and someone else takes their place....ie..."apple,sega?"

Thank you SONY for giving me back my true love and passion for gaming...

VanDammFan

Give me a break :|:roll:

NO give me a break. You read my story. I gave MS a chance for 9 years. The XBOX was a beast. I loved it. BUT the 360 has done nothing but disapoint me time and time again. Making me scared to even turn it on. And once it is on it sounds like a train rolling down the tracks. Yes the 360 has some good games. BUT its not enough to make me stay with them.

Your post was too melodramatic to take seriously. Obvious hyberbole for e-rhetorical purposes fails.
Avatar image for MortalDecay
MortalDecay

4298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 MortalDecay
Member since 2005 • 4298 Posts
[QUOTE="-supercharged-"]

PS3>360

PS3= 550MHz graphics core clock speed

360= 500MHz graphics core clock speed

PS3>360

PS3= 256MB XDR dedicated system memory and 256MB GDDR3 dedicated video memory

360= 512MB UMA shared memory

PS3>360

PS3= 50GB Blu-Ray Disc

360= 7 GB DVD disc

PS3>360

PS3= 2TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

360= 1TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

PS3>360

PS3= 25.6 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

360= 22.4 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

PS3>360

PS3= Full 1080p HD video resolution

360= Not full HD 1080i video resolution

and for added pleasure...

PS3>360

PS3= Includes both Bluetooth and Wifi included

360= Does not included Bluetooth and Wifi adapter is available for extra cost

PS3>360

PS3= Swappable HDD 2TB max

360= removable and can only be replaced with 360 HDD's 250gb max for now

So there you have it.. No longer will you have to scratch your heads on why PS3 exclusives look better than 360 exclusives. The PS3 obviously is the clear winner overall.

PS3>360/thread

Ok...So, where's the games that prove the PS3 is, "superior"? So far, no one has seen anything that cannot be done on the 360. Sony saying their games can't be done on any other console doesn't count.
Avatar image for MizFitAwesome
MizFitAwesome

2745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 MizFitAwesome
Member since 2009 • 2745 Posts

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

[QUOTE="LEGEND_C4A"]

Give me a break :|:roll:

GreySeal9

NO give me a break. You read my story. I gave MS a chance for 9 years. The XBOX was a beast. I loved it. BUT the 360 has done nothing but disapoint me time and time again. Making me scared to even turn it on. And once it is on it sounds like a train rolling down the tracks. Yes the 360 has some good games. BUT its not enough to make me stay with them.

Your post was too melodramatic to take seriously. Obvious hyberbole for e-rhetorical purposes fails.

Or Sony isn't paying enough to get good shills.....

Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

[QUOTE="88mphSlayer"]

best part about this thread is that the average gaming PC DESTROYS any of those specs

Hahadouken

What's awesome though is how close a console can look with such low specs because of a unified architecture. Imagine if PC devs tweaked and tuned and optimized to the same extent to get the most out of all PC setups. It would be unreal.

they do optimize heavily since they have to have the games scalable for many different sets of hardware, that's their version of optimization and it's more complicated than what you see in exclusive console games

but what's great is that when you crank things up, you can take a game that could run on a pentium 4 and make it look 10x better than anything on consoles

and with hardware always getting better, the sky is the limit, no need to limit game design with tiny corridors because your budget is focused on graphics

Avatar image for Diametraphine
Diametraphine

1148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Diametraphine
Member since 2010 • 1148 Posts

Grammar Timothy , grammar.

Avatar image for T-Aldous
T-Aldous

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 T-Aldous
Member since 2006 • 1244 Posts

[QUOTE="LEGEND_C4A"]

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

Dont know if Im totally with the OP here...BUT I will say that I bought a 360 at launch. It died on me 8 months later and was thrown in the trash. I bought another one and its been in for repair 4x now.

I have since gave my 360 to my boys. I could care less about it. Dont care even if they delete my games, themes ect..Just dont care. MS about killed my love of gaming with their junk. And I have been gaming since 1981 at the age of 10.

I just purchased the PS3 and a few games/ and movies....I have to say SONY has reassured me that gaming is still alive, innovative and ready to move me ahead in the hobby I love so dearly. The second I plugged it in I was in heaven. From the dashboard to the free online to HOME..I dont see me being unhappy in the near future. Especially since buying a DreamGear controller that is identical to the 360 controller.

I was a MS supporter from day one standing in line "1st" in line...for the Xbox in 01...THen "1st" in line for the 360...BOTH times waiting for 9 hours. Buying tons of games, controllers, even LIVE when it was first introduced. NOW...I simply hope they die and someone else takes their place....ie..."apple,sega?"

Thank you SONY for giving me back my true love and passion for gaming...

VanDammFan

Give me a break :|:roll:

NO give me a break. You read my story. I gave MS a chance for 9 years. The XBOX was a beast. I loved it. BUT the 360 has done nothing but disapoint me time and time again. Making me scared to even turn it on. And once it is on it sounds like a train rolling down the tracks. Yes the 360 has some good games. BUT its not enough to make me stay with them.

How did Sony not kill your love for gaming with their junk? If you remember the PSX and the PS2 were junk, yet you still gave them another chance. But if MS makes 1 piece of junk console then they can die? Sounds like a BS story to me, sorry.
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#61 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

TC, those are nice numbers but they only make PS3 look bad since this would be the first time in history that the "most powerfull console" had the worst looking version of the majority of games.

Why not just accept that PS3 is nothing like Sony hyped it to be and move on? Its a great console with awesome capabilities just like the 360. Not better or worse.

Avatar image for antifanboyftw
antifanboyftw

2214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 antifanboyftw
Member since 2007 • 2214 Posts

PS3>360

PS3= 550MHz graphics core clock speed

360= 500MHz graphics core clock speed

PS3>360

PS3= 256MB XDR dedicated system memory and 256MB GDDR3 dedicated video memory

360= 512MB UMA shared memory

PS3>360

PS3= 50GB Blu-Ray Disc

360= 7 GB DVD disc

PS3>360

PS3= 2TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

360= 1TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

PS3>360

PS3= 25.6 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

360= 22.4 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

PS3>360

PS3= Full 1080p HD video resolution

360= Not full HD 1080i video resolution

and for added pleasure...

PS3>360

PS3= Includes both Bluetooth and Wifi included

360= Does not included Bluetooth and Wifi adapter is available for extra cost

PS3>360

PS3= Swappable HDD 2TB max

360= removable and can only be replaced with 360 HDD's 250gb max for now

So there you have it.. No longer will you have to scratch your heads on why PS3 exclusives look better than 360 exclusives. The PS3 obviously is the clear winner overall.

PS3>360/thread

-supercharged-

IRREFUTABLE FACTUAL EVIDENCE!!!

Avatar image for zarshack
zarshack

9936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 149

User Lists: 0

#63 zarshack
Member since 2009 • 9936 Posts

Well this is original.... :?

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#64 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

Hey there, you rememeber how the original xbox had the better hardware last gen? Remind me again, did that win last gens console war?

JONO51

No at all. But the diference is that it actually won the console graphics war :P

Avatar image for falldogout
falldogout

429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 falldogout
Member since 2009 • 429 Posts

It's nice to know that while little kids are dying from hunger.

here in america we argue about the better video game console:lol:

Avatar image for tbolt76
tbolt76

987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#66 tbolt76
Member since 2008 • 987 Posts

PS3>360

PS3= 550MHz graphics core clock speed

360= 500MHz graphics core clock speed

PS3>360

PS3= 256MB XDR dedicated system memory and 256MB GDDR3 dedicated video memory

360= 512MB UMA shared memory

PS3>360

PS3= 50GB Blu-Ray Disc

360= 7 GB DVD disc

PS3>360

PS3= 2TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

360= 1TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

PS3>360

PS3= 25.6 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

360= 22.4 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

PS3>360

PS3= Full 1080p HD video resolution

360= Not full HD 1080i video resolution

and for added pleasure...

PS3>360

PS3= Includes both Bluetooth and Wifi included

360= Does not included Bluetooth and Wifi adapter is available for extra cost

PS3>360

PS3= Swappable HDD 2TB max

360= removable and can only be replaced with 360 HDD's 250gb max for now

So there you have it.. No longer will you have to scratch your heads on why PS3 exclusives look better than 360 exclusives. The PS3 obviously is the clear winner overall.

PS3>360/thread

-supercharged-

I know that they are all upscaled, but more of my games play in 1080p on my 360 than on the PS3.

Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#67 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

[QUOTE="LEGEND_C4A"]

Give me a break :|:roll:

T-Aldous

NO give me a break. You read my story. I gave MS a chance for 9 years. The XBOX was a beast. I loved it. BUT the 360 has done nothing but disapoint me time and time again. Making me scared to even turn it on. And once it is on it sounds like a train rolling down the tracks. Yes the 360 has some good games. BUT its not enough to make me stay with them.

How did Sony not kill your love for gaming with their junk? If you remember the PSX and the PS2 were junk, yet you still gave them another chance. But if MS makes 1 piece of junk console then they can die? Sounds like a BS story to me, sorry.

Actually bro, my launch PS1 and PS2 are still working just fine. AS is my launch XBOX and many other consoles. 360 is the ONLY one to give me problems.

Avatar image for T-Aldous
T-Aldous

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 T-Aldous
Member since 2006 • 1244 Posts

[QUOTE="T-Aldous"][QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

NO give me a break. You read my story. I gave MS a chance for 9 years. The XBOX was a beast. I loved it. BUT the 360 has done nothing but disapoint me time and time again. Making me scared to even turn it on. And once it is on it sounds like a train rolling down the tracks. Yes the 360 has some good games. BUT its not enough to make me stay with them.

VanDammFan

How did Sony not kill your love for gaming with their junk? If you remember the PSX and the PS2 were junk, yet you still gave them another chance. But if MS makes 1 piece of junk console then they can die? Sounds like a BS story to me, sorry.

Actually bro, my launch PS1 and PS2 are still working just fine. AS is my launch XBOX and many other consoles. 360 is the ONLY one to give me problems.

Well you are in the extreme minority, I personally went through 2 PSX's and 3 PS2's as Sony wouldn't confess to their crap consoles. I guess the opposite thing for us both happened. MS restored my gaming fun because they were the only company that stepped up to the plate over their junk console.
Avatar image for z4twenny
z4twenny

4898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#69 z4twenny
Member since 2006 • 4898 Posts

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

[QUOTE="T-Aldous"]How did Sony not kill your love for gaming with their junk? If you remember the PSX and the PS2 were junk, yet you still gave them another chance. But if MS makes 1 piece of junk console then they can die? Sounds like a BS story to me, sorry.T-Aldous

Actually bro, my launch PS1 and PS2 are still working just fine. AS is my launch XBOX and many other consoles. 360 is the ONLY one to give me problems.

Well you are in the extreme minority, I personally went through 2 PSX's and 3 PS2's as Sony wouldn't confess to their crap consoles. I guess the opposite thing for us both happened. MS restored my gaming fun because they were the only company that stepped up to the plate over their junk console.

funny cuz my ps2 and ps1's never gave out. in fact my first ps1 was assembled from good pieces of other ps1's that were damaged in shipping.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

I don't think most people care about what's inside a console...Let alone it being the decisive factor whether a console is better than the other one.

Lto_thaG
i agree...if it plays the games i like to my satisfaction, i'm happy.
Avatar image for gugler990
gugler990

2009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 gugler990
Member since 2010 • 2009 Posts

I dont understand too much science and numbers my head hurts i thinking im gonna faint dahkgfsybibecxinfcslcm,ds uaeom BOOM

Avatar image for Shielder7
Shielder7

5191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#72 Shielder7
Member since 2006 • 5191 Posts
Both systems have there strengths and weaknesses. 360s GPU is better and Ps3 have better SPUs. When talking exclusives the Ps3 has more potential to make a bit better looking games but 360 is 3X easier to program for. All in all I like my Ps3 better because of the 1 disk system and the games that are coming out for it however the read speed of the 360 is better. With that said I have yet to see a game on either system that outshines or could not be put on another system even tho I prefer the Ps3 as of now.
Avatar image for Ribnarak
Ribnarak

2299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Ribnarak
Member since 2008 • 2299 Posts

ill end this:

what system has the best looking game (no PC):
PS3.

Since its gamest that we play on our system, it makes sense that we compare the technical side of the game.

Avatar image for T-Aldous
T-Aldous

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 T-Aldous
Member since 2006 • 1244 Posts

[QUOTE="T-Aldous"][QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

Actually bro, my launch PS1 and PS2 are still working just fine. AS is my launch XBOX and many other consoles. 360 is the ONLY one to give me problems.

z4twenny

Well you are in the extreme minority, I personally went through 2 PSX's and 3 PS2's as Sony wouldn't confess to their crap consoles. I guess the opposite thing for us both happened. MS restored my gaming fun because they were the only company that stepped up to the plate over their junk console.

funny cuz my ps2 and ps1's never gave out. in fact my first ps1 was assembled from good pieces of other ps1's that were damaged in shipping.

I find it amazing how all PS3 fans NEVER had a single problem with their PSX or PS2's, it was just everyone else in the world that had issues. I was a huge PS2 fan and so were most of my friends and between all of us we figured we went through about 17 to 20 PS2's. But none of the cows here ever had one break....weird.

Avatar image for furomaster_99
furomaster_99

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 furomaster_99
Member since 2009 • 737 Posts

[QUOTE="-supercharged-"]

PS3>360

PS3= 550MHz graphics core clock speed

360= 500MHz graphics core clock speed

PS3>360

PS3= 256MB XDR dedicated system memory and 256MB GDDR3 dedicated video memory

360= 512MB UMA shared memory

PS3>360

PS3= 50GB Blu-Ray Disc

360= 7 GB DVD disc

PS3>360

PS3= 2TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

360= 1TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

PS3>360

PS3= 25.6 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

360= 22.4 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

PS3>360

PS3= Full 1080p HD video resolution

360= Not full HD 1080i video resolution

and for added pleasure...

PS3>360

PS3= Includes both Bluetooth and Wifi included

360= Does not included Bluetooth and Wifi adapter is available for extra cost

PS3>360

PS3= Swappable HDD 2TB max

360= removable and can only be replaced with 360 HDD's 250gb max for now

So there you have it.. No longer will you have to scratch your heads on why PS3 exclusives look better than 360 exclusives. The PS3 obviously is the clear winner overall.

PS3>360/thread

MortalDecay

Ok...So, where's the games that prove the PS3 is, "superior"? So far, no one has seen anything that cannot be done on the 360. Sony saying their games can't be done on any other console doesn't count.

Where's the 360 games that prove it's not?

Avatar image for MadVybz
MadVybz

2797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#77 MadVybz
Member since 2009 • 2797 Posts

So....games?

Avatar image for zarshack
zarshack

9936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 149

User Lists: 0

#78 zarshack
Member since 2009 • 9936 Posts

PS3>Wii>360falldogout
Not quick enough with that delete button eh?

Avatar image for falldogout
falldogout

429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#79 falldogout
Member since 2009 • 429 Posts

[QUOTE="falldogout"]PS3>Wii>360zarshack

Not quick enough with that delete button eh?

Guess not :(
Avatar image for dovberg
dovberg

3348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#80 dovberg
Member since 2009 • 3348 Posts

This stuff too me is absurd, and it's always the song fanboy who wants to bring this stuff up. I had friend who wuld tell me FFX had the most amazing graphics he's ever seen and I burst out laughing and said "have you never seen anything on xbox?" The specs were better on the saturn and still PSone had better looking and better games. PS2 had mostly bad games and bad graphics but it was themost popular hands down. The wii has mostly bad games and bad graphics and it is winning, so who cares? The DS has mostly bad graphics ad good games, so who cares? The system wth the greatest stats has never been what has determined what is the best system. My 360 hasnever broken, it is perfect and it runs 1080P! My tv always says in a corner what it is running in on when I turn it on, usually it is 1080p on both systems. I have owned all 3 systems, I don't like the the exclusives on ps3, I liked little big planet but it is always over priced, infamous,mgs4 just plane suck. I could go on for hours on the medeocre performance of the AAA games of ps3, they just aren't held to the same standard. I can't find people to play me in sf4 like i can on the 360. PSN is virtually worthless if you have a 360 and no PSP. I do like having wireless built in, and a blue ray player. The old playstation controller design feels old and just doesn't work as well as the 360s, but it is nice not having to buy a seperate charger. Required instalations drive me nuts, when you are ready to play you don't want endless load times. At the end of the day I like having a 360 because I like Gears of War, Fable,Halo,Left 4 Dead and don't like waiting longer for games with a few add onsand a controller that isn't as comfortable.I don't like uncharted,infamous,mgs4,

in simple terms there are is no worthwhile online with the ps3, there is an old controller on the ps3, and mostly there are no good exclusives. I dowant GoW3 but it has always felt like a genericcopy of dmc to me, and I'd rather have a more functional bayonetta than GoW3.

Avatar image for Martin_G_N
Martin_G_N

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Martin_G_N
Member since 2006 • 2124 Posts

[QUOTE="-supercharged-"]

PS3>360

PS3= 550MHz graphics core clock speed

360= 500MHz graphics core clock speed

PS3>360

PS3= 256MB XDR dedicated system memory and 256MB GDDR3 dedicated video memory

360= 512MB UMA shared memory

PS3>360

PS3= 50GB Blu-Ray Disc

360= 7 GB DVD disc

PS3>360

PS3= 2TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

360= 1TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

PS3>360

PS3= 25.6 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

360= 22.4 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

PS3>360

PS3= Full 1080p HD video resolution

360= Not full HD 1080i video resolution

and for added pleasure...

PS3>360

PS3= Includes both Bluetooth and Wifi included

360= Does not included Bluetooth and Wifi adapter is available for extra cost

PS3>360

PS3= Swappable HDD 2TB max

360= removable and can only be replaced with 360 HDD's 250gb max for now

So there you have it.. No longer will you have to scratch your heads on why PS3 exclusives look better than 360 exclusives. The PS3 obviously is the clear winner overall.

PS3>360/thread

tbolt76

I know that they are all upscaled, but more of my games play in 1080p on my 360 than on the PS3.

I can play my PS1, PS2 and GC games in 1080p because my receiver upscales. It does not mean the image is any better. The fact is, almost none of the games this gen runs a higher native resolution than 720p, alot of them are even below that aswell. The 1080p native on the PS3 is usually 1280x1080p and it upscales the 1280 part. Like in GT5p. Anyways, the X360 is easier to develop on and to port games from the PC. While the PS3 can do some really awesome stuff when it's prioritized. But still, the PS3 is no where near the performance we were promised before it came out.
Avatar image for tirralirra
tirralirra

2261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 tirralirra
Member since 2009 • 2261 Posts
Dunno what people are chatting about. This thread is foolproof. Nothing he has said is false, mainly due to the use of the 'greater than' or > sign. You are all just debating what > means.
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#83 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="-supercharged-"]

PS3>360

PS3= 550MHz graphics core clock speed

360= 500MHz graphics core clock speed

PS3>360

PS3= 256MB XDR dedicated system memory and 256MB GDDR3 dedicated video memory

360= 512MB UMA shared memory

PS3>360

PS3= 50GB Blu-Ray Disc

360= 7 GB DVD disc

PS3>360

PS3= 2TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

360= 1TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

PS3>360

PS3= 25.6 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

360= 22.4 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

PS3>360

PS3= Full 1080p HD video resolution

360= Not full HD 1080i video resolution

and for added pleasure...

PS3>360

PS3= Includes both Bluetooth and Wifi included

360= Does not included Bluetooth and Wifi adapter is available for extra cost

PS3>360

PS3= Swappable HDD 2TB max

360= removable and can only be replaced with 360 HDD's 250gb max for now

So there you have it.. No longer will you have to scratch your heads on why PS3 exclusives look better than 360 exclusives. The PS3 obviously is the clear winner overall.

PS3>360/thread

iKINGBOBi

pixel fill rate PS3=250 million triangles/sec xbox 360 =500 million triangles/sec this means the 360 can render twice as many pixels as the PS3, anyone can do that with figures, does it equate to the real world? does the 360 have twice the texture detail in games? the answer is NO, you can spout specs all day long, but in the real world the 360 and the Ps3 are so identical in power it's not worth measuring the difference, the Ps3 can only slightly outperform the 360, and it takes a hell of a lot more work for that slight difference, it's the games that matter, i will keep my 360 with the slightly inferior graphics, because in my opinion it has the better library

says the guy that has nothing but multiplats in his gamertag sig:roll:

check out the PC/360 exclusives i have played on the 360, can't play mass effect 2 on the Ps3 can i, it has the better library because i CAN'T play those games on the Ps3
Avatar image for RogueShodown
RogueShodown

2818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 RogueShodown
Member since 2009 • 2818 Posts

[QUOTE="-supercharged-"]

PS3>360

PS3= 550MHz graphics core clock speed

360= 500MHz graphics core clock speed

PS3>360

PS3= 256MB XDR dedicated system memory and 256MB GDDR3 dedicated video memory

360= 512MB UMA shared memory

PS3>360

PS3= 50GB Blu-Ray Disc

360= 7 GB DVD disc

PS3>360

PS3= 2TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

360= 1TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

PS3>360

PS3= 25.6 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

360= 22.4 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

PS3>360

PS3= Full 1080p HD video resolution

360= Not full HD 1080i video resolution

and for added pleasure...

PS3>360

PS3= Includes both Bluetooth and Wifi included

360= Does not included Bluetooth and Wifi adapter is available for extra cost

PS3>360

PS3= Swappable HDD 2TB max

360= removable and can only be replaced with 360 HDD's 250gb max for now

So there you have it.. No longer will you have to scratch your heads on why PS3 exclusives look better than 360 exclusives. The PS3 obviously is the clear winner overall.

PS3>360/thread

HuusAsking

Let's break down your points point by point.

  • First, GPU clock is useless to compare. One may simply be able to do more per clock cycle than the other (which the Xenos has demonstrated).
  • Second, having unified memory can be a boon. If you have a part of the game that's low on graphics but high on non-graphic memory (or vice-versa, an area heavy on graphics but low on non-graphics demands), how would you redistribute the workload on a PS3, whose memory limitations are fixed?
  • Few games today exceed 6-7GB, even on the PC (where capacities are less of an issue). Development costs tend to preclude much bigger games, and that's independent of disc size. Of the entire 360 lineup of hundreds of games, the number of multi-disc games are miniscule, and most are JRPGs where multiple discs are not so frowned upon due to their linear progression (remember FF7?).
  • Do those TFLOP calculations take the GPU into consideration, which are much more capable of floating-point operations? Besides, gaming involves a lot of integer and bit logic as well as floating-point computation.
  • A 10% difference in memory throughput. Doesn't seem like much to me. Plus, last I read the PS3 has a few bottlenecks that can hamper that rate.
  • The 360 can and has done 1080p60 games (VT3, NBA Street 2). It's just tricky for either console to do it while performing graphically-intensive scenes (Otherwise, why aren't GoW3 or GT5 being targeted at 1080p60 during gameplay anymore?).
  • Bluetooth is not necessary for the 360 since it has its own wireless comm system for controllers and headsets. As for WiFi, what if you have an 802.11n network? Now the PS3's in the same boat since n is multi-antenna and requires a hardware upgrade. Anyway, what if you don't need or don't trust WiFi? Then you'd be paying for something you don't want.
  • It's not like you need a hard drive to play 360 games. The number of ones that do can be counted with one hand. And installation is an option, unlike a number of PS3 games. Besides, if you want to play media on your 360 you can always attach a USB hard drive, connect over a home network, or employ Windows Media Center.

I don't know about the technical stuff, so I can't comment on that, but I disagree with your HDD statement. In most cases, you'll probably need a harddrive to play games. Want to play online? Get a HDD. Want to play Original XBOX games? Get an HDD. You still need an HDD if you pass the 256 mb limit of storage in an arcade, and there are games like Forza 3 that require installation to play all of the game. You can't really do anything on Xbox Live without an HDD, which is arguably the funnest part of owning a Xbox360. This was the biggest reason why I chose a PS3 over a 360. I wasn't planning on getting Live because I didn't want to pay the money that it costs($20 is ok, though, for people who get it when the deals are around).

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

no. just no.

but blu ray is nice and adds value to it

Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

Xbox 360 sales > PS3 sales

xbox 360 games sales > PS3 game sales

Xbox 360 more A/AA/AAA > PS3

Xbox Live > PSN

Xbox 360 controller > Dual Shock 3

Oh, lookie. I haven an opinion too.

Jamiemydearx3

The OP just got himself owned. The 360 is exactly the same as the PS3 in terms of power & graphics. People like the OP thinks that the PS3 is more powerful than the 360 because of games like Uncharted 2. Just give the developers the same money & time, & I guarantee you that the graphics would come out to be the same on the 360.

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#87 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12864 Posts
jeez ...... its not 2006 anymore, give it a rest.
Avatar image for 93soccer
93soccer

4602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#88 93soccer
Member since 2009 • 4602 Posts
LOL cows get more desperate everyday
Avatar image for MizFitAwesome
MizFitAwesome

2745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 MizFitAwesome
Member since 2009 • 2745 Posts

LOL cows get more desperate everyday93soccer

I guess they are still stung over ME2....

Avatar image for antoniopuerta16
antoniopuerta16

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#90 antoniopuerta16
Member since 2007 • 111 Posts

What the point of this thread seriously? Even is the PS3 is superior than the Xbox 360....What are you going to do about it? Its not like Sony and Microsoft your father companies.Dont support them to the extremes.Know you limits.Grow up!

Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#91 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

What the point of this thread seriously? Even is the PS3 is superior than the Xbox 360....What are you going to do about it? Its not like Sony and Microsoft your father companies.Dont support them to the extremes.Know you limits.Grow up!

antoniopuerta16

i agree wit this man

Avatar image for abmac713
abmac713

330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 abmac713
Member since 2007 • 330 Posts

What the point of this thread seriously? Even is the PS3 is superior than the Xbox 360....What are you going to do about it? Its not like Sony and Microsoft your father companies.Dont support them to the extremes.Know you limits.Grow up!

antoniopuerta16

Lol. Agreed.

Avatar image for karsa-orlong
karsa-orlong

536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 karsa-orlong
Member since 2009 • 536 Posts

um halo reach :P

ps3 still isnt as good as my pc

mirriorman

considering the hardware difference, i hope not. actually if you had a pc with similiar components to the ps3 i wonder which would look better.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#94 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

This stuff too me is absurd, and it's always the song fanboy who wants to bring this stuff up. I had friend who wuld tell me FFX had the most amazing graphics he's ever seen and I burst out laughing and said "have you never seen anything on xbox?"

dovberg
Ironically, I had someone tell me that FFX had batter graphics than DOOM 3 did the other day. It was hilarious. At the end of the day, the games are the only thing that matter. You can pull the "But X spec is better on Y console" but if Y console doesn't have good games, no one gives a flying fadoodle. Luckily, both the PS3 and the 360 have great games. You'd think this stuff would've dies down by now...
Avatar image for antoniopuerta16
antoniopuerta16

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#95 antoniopuerta16
Member since 2007 • 111 Posts

Surprise that some people agree with me.Thought I'm going to be bashed up by the fanboys....

Avatar image for 93soccer
93soccer

4602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#96 93soccer
Member since 2009 • 4602 Posts

[QUOTE="93soccer"]LOL cows get more desperate everydayMizFitAwesome

I guess they are still stung over ME2....

Yep. They are sad they still don't have a AAA title in 2010 and it's Feb. already
Avatar image for MortalDecay
MortalDecay

4298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 MortalDecay
Member since 2005 • 4298 Posts

[QUOTE="MortalDecay"][QUOTE="-supercharged-"]

PS3>360

PS3= 550MHz graphics core clock speed

360= 500MHz graphics core clock speed

PS3>360

PS3= 256MB XDR dedicated system memory and 256MB GDDR3 dedicated video memory

360= 512MB UMA shared memory

PS3>360

PS3= 50GB Blu-Ray Disc

360= 7 GB DVD disc

PS3>360

PS3= 2TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

360= 1TFLOP Overall System Floating-Point Performance

PS3>360

PS3= 25.6 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

360= 22.4 GB Main Memory Bandwidth

PS3>360

PS3= Full 1080p HD video resolution

360= Not full HD 1080i video resolution

and for added pleasure...

PS3>360

PS3= Includes both Bluetooth and Wifi included

360= Does not included Bluetooth and Wifi adapter is available for extra cost

PS3>360

PS3= Swappable HDD 2TB max

360= removable and can only be replaced with 360 HDD's 250gb max for now

So there you have it.. No longer will you have to scratch your heads on why PS3 exclusives look better than 360 exclusives. The PS3 obviously is the clear winner overall.

PS3>360/thread

furomaster_99

Ok...So, where's the games that prove the PS3 is, "superior"? So far, no one has seen anything that cannot be done on the 360. Sony saying their games can't be done on any other console doesn't count.

Where's the 360 games that prove it's not?

That makes no sense, at all. The burden of proof is on the PS3. The 360 has proven it can keep up with the PS3 very easily in the graphics department.

Avatar image for EndorphinMaster
EndorphinMaster

2118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 EndorphinMaster
Member since 2009 • 2118 Posts

[QUOTE="93soccer"]LOL cows get more desperate everydayMizFitAwesome

I guess they are still stung over ME2....

Being stuck with a embarrassingly inferior version of Bayonetta has made them quite bitter too.

Avatar image for Persistantthug
Persistantthug

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Persistantthug
Member since 2009 • 1420 Posts

The OP just got himself owned. The 360 is exactly the same as the PS3 in terms of power & graphics. People like the OP thinks that the PS3 is more powerful than the 360 because of games like Uncharted 2. Just give the developers the same money & time, & I guarantee you that the graphics would come out to be the same on the 360.

garland51

Why do people insist on trying to fool themselves?

No, the XBOX 360 is not the same as PS3 in power or graphics. Why? Because the The PS3 has the CELL PROCESSOR and the Cell processor does what no other Consumer CPU can do, including PC CPU's.....The Cell can graphics process and graphics render by ITSELF.

XBOX has some good games but XBOX 360 will never have the same graphical potential of PS3...period.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#100 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="garland51"]

The OP just got himself owned. The 360 is exactly the same as the PS3 in terms of power & graphics. People like the OP thinks that the PS3 is more powerful than the 360 because of games like Uncharted 2. Just give the developers the same money & time, & I guarantee you that the graphics would come out to be the same on the 360.

Persistantthug

Why do people insist on trying to fool themselves?

No, the XBOX 360 is not the same as PS3 in power or graphics. Why? Because the The PS3 has the CELL PROCESSOR and the Cell processor does what no other Consumer CPU can do, including PC CPU's.....The Cell can graphics process and graphics render by ITSELF.

XBOX 360 will never have the same graphical potential of PS3...period.

XBOX has some good games but XBOX 360 will never have the same graphical potential of PS3...period.

If the Cell is so ahead of CPU cores, explain why Crysis looks better than every PS3 game. Go ahead. I'll wait.