Man this is getting absurd.
People on this forum are claiming that an optionnal installation is a bad thing. None of you guys have played the game or any game on the ps3 I'll bet. You're here venting hot air and strutting your stuf like you're the worlds gift to the gaming community.
Get your facts straight first ok.
Lot's of ps3 games have an optionnal installation. Something made possible because every ps3 has a harddrive. Devs have also already complained about microsoft who doesn't allow installs, because they have a sku without harddrive on the market.
Certain reviewers even think of this as a possitive element in their reviews. As loadtimes are short to begin with, (except motorstorm, I'll grant you that one) but get even shorter after installation.
Many games load as fast on the ps3 as on the 360, even without installing a chunk of gamedata. Call of duty 4 is a good example, but so is Assassin's Creed en the darkness. The Blu-ray reader is indeed slower than a dvd drive, but still more than fast enough. The bottle neck here isn't the drive but your available memory. 500 megs isn't that much, be it unified or dedicated.
And concerning games like dmc4 and burnout paradise, ps3 was the platform it was developed on, so the game will always have an edge on that platform. If we can believe the many previews for both games, which state the ps3 version has the advantage for once, then how can you be so ignorant that when you can make the actual choice you'll choose the inferior version?
All of you who are now crying "Oooh this is the reason I won't buy it for the ps3", wouldn't have bought it anyway, because you don't own one.
Stop being so amazingly stupid, please...
I know none of you guys are going to read this, because it's way to long and argumented for you guys to wrap your little brains around it.
Log in to comment