that first statement is not true at all I've build plenty of pcs from regular desktops to gaming pcs and its common sense you don't use gddr5 for CPU task because while its great at doing heavy tasks it has a problem doing to small things that needed for the CPU. EVERY APU that's being used right now and coming out this year none of them are using ps4 APU why? They are all using ddr3 for cpu task if the ps4 was so advanced and so great Im sure AMD, NIVIDIA, and VALVE would have followed, sony cut corners tried to save money, you can deny it and yes I know how much gddr5 cost but it would cost more to put 3 different memory in a console than just putting one kind of RAM. Im not talking about benchmarks for a cpu because that not PS4 whole system it don't shows how it pertain to the ps4 arch.
It is not so much common sense as impossible because you cannot buy GDDR5 as a consumer. Even if memory manufacturers were to make GDDR5 memory sticks like they do DDR3 memory sticks it would need to be on a different sized DIMM and that would require motherboard manufacturers to produce motherboards that support the GDDR5 DIMM standard and it would also require a CPU/APU manufacturer to produce a chip with a memory controller that can talk to GDDR5. AMD were going to do this with Kaveri but the market is too small for it to be profitable for motherboard and memory manufacturers and without them onboard it is a non starter.
If Sony wanted to cut corners to save money they would have stuck with 4GB of GDDR5 rather than up it to 8GB. They could have used a 12 CU GPU like the Xbox 1 which would have reduce the die size of the chips and lowered the cooling requirements. The PS4 has been designed with a specific sale price in mind and it appears the engineers have done an excellent job of optimising the hardware for that price point.
If you want whole system benchmarks then look a BF4, AC4 etc
AC4 - Eurogamer "It's a rock-solid 30fps on PlayStation 4 at 1080p, while the Xbox One maintains a similar performance level at its reduced 900p resolution, with just one or two little hiccups."
BF4 - Eurogamer "Hard evidence of the PS4's frame-rate lead for the retail release of Battlefield 4 - even with its 50 per cent increase in resolution it can typically command a 10fps+ advantage during our stress-tests. However, both versions do have their pitfalls."
I could go on but there is little point as you have no clue what you are talking about.
Log in to comment