it definitely has to do with the bandwidth or the ram architecture. im thinking 6 gigs for Ram for games 2 for O/S. 3 insiders now said they have heard nothing. and the FCC has approved specs
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="TheDidact"]I'm saving this post. You're gonna be really disappointed tomorrow. :lol:Desmoniche is just joking around,don't take it seriously.. Not only is this the Internet, it's also SW. Everything that can be taken seriously WILL be taken seriously for pwnage/ownage purposes lol :P You should already know that this is how it works here XD well true,some people gets under their skin the shit i said :lol:
[QUOTE="Zaibach"]
[QUOTE="XBOunity"]
if it was 4 gigs of Ram that would blow up systemwars. i might pay 2000 dollars and dance naked in my street if it meant that could happen :lol: you and other cows would cry real life teams
I kid but honestly would be funny.
XBOunity
wha? :?
if it was announced tomorrow that Sony only had 4 gigs instead of 8 gigs, the place would turn upside down, and you might cry real life tears. agree?
but it has already gone through the FCC what dont u get about that[QUOTE="XBOunity"][QUOTE="Zaibach"]
wha? :?
stereointegrity
if it was announced tomorrow that Sony only had 4 gigs instead of 8 gigs, the place would turn upside down, and you might cry real life tears. agree?
but it has already gone through the FCC what dont u get about that dev kits not the system[QUOTE="XBOunity"][QUOTE="Zaibach"]
wha? :?
stereointegrity
if it was announced tomorrow that Sony only had 4 gigs instead of 8 gigs, the place would turn upside down, and you might cry real life tears. agree?
but it has already gone through the FCC what dont u get about thatWell, what effect would halving the quantity of RAM within the machine have on it's safety, or another facet the FCC has an interest in, for this consumer electronics device?
Might have already been posted but here it is again
Â
https://twitter.com/kr3at0r/status/360573712937914370
Â
update from the same dude who did the first one
Â
translation:Â Calm down! It's just some info about how memory works and nothing more. Nothing serious!Â
yep... sorry lems.. hope you enoyed the high horse... now get the **** off
Un poco de calma! Es algo de info sobre cómo va la memoria y ya está. Nada grave ! :)
Josep Maria Sempere (@kr3at0r) July 26, 2013
Â
Lemming dreams squashed.
not one even said that was true..Might have already been posted but here it is again
Â
https://twitter.com/kr3at0r/status/360573712937914370
Â
update from the same dude who did the first one
Â
translation:Â Calm down! It's just some info about how memory works and nothing more. Nothing serious!Â
yep... sorry lems.. hope you enoyed the high horse... now get the **** off
RedentSC
[QUOTE="RedentSC"]not one even said that was true.. What? so what was the point in this entire thread and the lems jumping around like its christmas? doesn't matter if it was confirmed or not.... Lems ran with it... Cows put them right... AGAINMight have already been posted but here it is again
Â
https://twitter.com/kr3at0r/status/360573712937914370
Â
update from the same dude who did the first one
Â
translation:Â Calm down! It's just some info about how memory works and nothing more. Nothing serious!Â
yep... sorry lems.. hope you enoyed the high horse... now get the **** off
Tessellation
Look at cows worrying about getting a small downgrade. They should be more worried about the ONE's 5 billion transistor GPU with an 8.5 TF performance that puts the highest end PCs to shame. :lol:
Any post you make is automatically invalid .. just sayingLook at cows worrying about getting a small downgrade. They should be more worried about the ONE's 5 billion transistor GPU with an 8.5 TF performance that puts the highest end PCs to shame. :lol:
CallOfDutyRulez
[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="RedentSC"]not one even said that was true.. What? so what was the point in this entire thread and the lems jumping around like its christmas? doesn't matter if it was confirmed or not.... Lems ran with it... Cows put them right... AGAIN lol quit crying,you're on SW regardless of true or not any info to puck fun at others is welcome,you shouldn't be here if it bothers you..Might have already been posted but here it is again
Â
https://twitter.com/kr3at0r/status/360573712937914370
Â
update from the same dude who did the first one
Â
translation:Â Calm down! It's just some info about how memory works and nothing more. Nothing serious!Â
yep... sorry lems.. hope you enoyed the high horse... now get the **** off
RedentSC
[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="XBOunity"]but it has already gone through the FCC what dont u get about that dev kits not the system the system went through dumb dumbif it was announced tomorrow that Sony only had 4 gigs instead of 8 gigs, the place would turn upside down, and you might cry real life tears. agree?
Tessellation
[QUOTE="CallOfDutyRulez"]Any post you make is automatically invalid .. just sayingLook at cows worrying about getting a small downgrade. They should be more worried about the ONE's 5 billion transistor GPU with an 8.5 TF performance that puts the highest end PCs to shame. :lol:
RedentSC
http://misterxmedia.livejournal.com/
"on raw performance it is between 7970 and 2x7970
see it is same like parasite or misterx insider
it is about 4.8 TF RAW"
With 2x 7970, it's around 8.5 ~ 9.5 TF performance.
[QUOTE="CallOfDutyRulez"]Any post you make is automatically invalid .. just sayingLook at cows worrying about getting a small downgrade. They should be more worried about the ONE's 5 billion transistor GPU with an 8.5 TF performance that puts the highest end PCs to shame. :lol:
RedentSC
he is a very smart guy, just believes that article he read.  I call that bullshit too, but you can dream.
Any post you make is automatically invalid .. just saying[QUOTE="RedentSC"][QUOTE="CallOfDutyRulez"]
Look at cows worrying about getting a small downgrade. They should be more worried about the ONE's 5 billion transistor GPU with an 8.5 TF performance that puts the highest end PCs to shame. :lol:
CallOfDutyRulez
http://misterxmedia.livejournal.com/
"on raw performance it is between 7970 and 2x7970
see it is same like parasite or misterx insider
it is about 4.8 TF RAW"
With 2x 7970, it's around 8.5 ~ 9.5 TF performance.
just think about that dude, its bullshit
[QUOTE="CallOfDutyRulez"]
[QUOTE="RedentSC"] Any post you make is automatically invalid .. just sayingXBOunity
http://misterxmedia.livejournal.com/
"on raw performance it is between 7970 and 2x7970
see it is same like parasite or misterx insider
it is about 4.8 TF RAW"
With 2x 7970, it's around 8.5 ~ 9.5 TF performance.
just think about that dude, its bullshit
Are you really stupid enough to argue against mathematics?
2x7970 is a perfect 5 billion transistor chip. It matches exactly what Microsoft said and what insiders said: 5 billion transistors is for GPU ONLY.
[QUOTE="CallOfDutyRulez"]Any post you make is automatically invalid .. just saying He is the defenition of a fakeboy.Look at cows worrying about getting a small downgrade. They should be more worried about the ONE's 5 billion transistor GPU with an 8.5 TF performance that puts the highest end PCs to shame. :lol:
RedentSC
Any post you make is automatically invalid .. just saying[QUOTE="RedentSC"][QUOTE="CallOfDutyRulez"]
Look at cows worrying about getting a small downgrade. They should be more worried about the ONE's 5 billion transistor GPU with an 8.5 TF performance that puts the highest end PCs to shame. :lol:
XBOunity
he is a very smart guy, just believes that article he read.  I call that bullshit too, but you can dream.
Â
Sure hides it well.
[QUOTE="RedentSC"][QUOTE="CallOfDutyRulez"]Any post you make is automatically invalid .. just saying He is the defenition of a fakeboy.Look at cows worrying about getting a small downgrade. They should be more worried about the ONE's 5 billion transistor GPU with an 8.5 TF performance that puts the highest end PCs to shame. :lol:
deeliman
- Insiders confirm 5 billion transistor is for GPU ONLY.
2x AMD 7970 = 5 billion transistor.
>768 ALU for the GPU
Nvidia GTX 680 = 1536 ALU
AMD 7970 = 2048 ALU
Nvidia's architecture is more efficient, so its 1536 ALU can beat 7970's 2048 ALU
So to beat titan with 2880 ALU, AMD must provide a GCN 1.0 performance of 3840 ALUÂ or 1.3 times of ALU number for titan.
Since Nvidia Titan has 2880 ALU, the ONE's AMD GPU must be at least 3840 ALU on GCN 1.0.
AMD recently created GCN 2.0 GPU with 2880 ALU and claimed it would work more efficiently than NVIDIA's titan.
More specifically, GCN 2.0 will have 30-40% better efficient design, meaning that with GCN 2.0, the ONE's GPU would only need 2880 ALU.
9.6tflops fits so perfectly.
2-3x the power of PS4dev-kit. 3.2 x 3 = 9.6 exactly!! the reason for 2-3x and not just 3x is because 20-24scÂ
Also MS claimed at beginning of this gen that 360 was 1tflop total. Then MS at X1 HW reveal said almost 10x power of 360. 2.4tflop = 10 x 240gflops...little did we know 2.4tflop + GCN 2.0= 9.6tf reality.
He is the defenition of a fakeboy.[QUOTE="deeliman"][QUOTE="RedentSC"] Any post you make is automatically invalid .. just sayingCallOfDutyRulez
- Insiders confirm 5 billion transistor is for GPU ONLY.
2x AMD 7970 = 5 billion transistor.
>768 ALU for the GPU
Nvidia GTX 680 = 1536 ALU
AMD 7970 = 2048 ALU
Nvidia's architecture is more efficient, so its 1536 ALU can beat 7970's 2048 ALU
So to beat titan with 2880 ALU, AMD must provide a GCN 1.0 performance of 3840 ALUÂ or 1.3 times of ALU number for titan.
Since Nvidia Titan has 2880 ALU, the ONE's AMD GPU must be at least 3840 ALU on GCN 1.0.
AMD recently created GCN 2.0 GPU with 2880 ALU and claimed it would work more efficiently than NVIDIA's titan.
More specifically, GCN 2.0 will have 30-40% better efficient design, meaning that with GCN 2.0, the ONE's GPU would only need 2880 ALU.
i don't understand why sony needs to make an announcement regarding this shit if is not a big issue? this should matter to the developer environment and not costumers.
i don't understand why sony needs to make an announcement regarding this shit if is not a big issue? this should matter to the developer environment and not costumers.
Tessellation
the article is still going to be interesting.  its about how the ram works,     i dont know what that guys deal was, but he is reputable right?
IF eurogamer are writing an article about it, Sony know some people will freak out without fully understanding the technology. Taking "not as much raw power" to mean everything is totally **** and this is the end of the PS4... basically they might just want to set the record straight? .. i mean look what has happened here and nobody knows anything yeti don't understand why sony needs to make an announcement regarding this shit if is not a big issue? this should matter to the developer environment and not costumers.
Tessellation
[QUOTE="Tessellation"]
i don't understand why sony needs to make an announcement regarding this shit if is not a big issue? this should matter to the developer environment and not costumers.
XBOunity
the article is still going to be interesting.  its about how the ram works,     i dont know what that guys deal was, but he is reputable right?
Cerny already explained that :S (Onion,Garlic buses), to me the only statement Sony can make is how the RAM is allocated for system resources.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment