PSN now = to Xlive

  • 109 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts

[QUOTE="Warzone876"]

LOL LEMMINGS

IF MULTIPLATFORMS WERE CREATED ON PS3 THEN THEY cant be ported on 360 because it is inferior.

They have to create it on 360 so it can run on both.

BTW PSN > live.

Why? because im not paying to play online lol

patriots7672

Exactly, if created on PS3 first then it wouldn't work on a 3 processor system after being created on a 7 processor system.

Are you guys for real!!???? LOL Holy Crap LOL!!!

Avatar image for Ultramarine777
Ultramarine777

1030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#52 Ultramarine777
Member since 2006 • 1030 Posts

lol poor lemmings. Paying $50 a month to play 16 player games with lagswitching and major lag bombs. I can play 60 player games with no lag and no cheating. :D

Avatar image for GeneralMLD
GeneralMLD

70

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 GeneralMLD
Member since 2009 • 70 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralMLD"][QUOTE="patriots7672"]

Buy a 360 and a PS3 put them side by side and put a dvd in the 360 and a bluray movie in the PS3. PS3 advantage.

Take a 360 game and a PS3 game and see how easily you can scratch a 360 disc and a PS3 disc. PS3 advantage gained.

Then try to hook up WiFI on 360 and PS3, try to web browse, upgrade each one's HDD as high as possible and compare the capacity and price. 500gb PS3 for $120 360 160 gb HDD $120, insert a disc into each and see which is better PS3 auto discdrive or 360 disctray, sign up 5 people on PSN and 5 on Xlive, PSN = $0 xlive = $250. Get the picture!!!

Warzone876

Yet PS3 is in last place by a growing margin. Go figure :P

Its called being expensive small ignorant child. ;)

irrelevant. Surely "teh value" should overcome it :)
Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#54 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

[QUOTE="Warzone876"]

LOL LEMMINGS

IF MULTIPLATFORMS WERE CREATED ON PS3 THEN THEY cant be ported on 360 because it is inferior.

They have to create it on 360 so it can run on both.

BTW PSN > live.

Why? because im not paying to play online lol

patriots7672

Exactly, if created on PS3 first then it wouldn't work on a 3 processor system after being created on a 7 processor system.

If I recall correctly, Burnout Paradise and a few other titles were developed on the PS3 and ported...funny how that works...sort of turns your theory on its head doesn't it?
Avatar image for teemany
teemany

278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 teemany
Member since 2009 • 278 Posts
No it isn't. >_> People dont pay for Xbox Live for no reason.Ninja-Hippo
People pay for LIVE because Microsoft used the same tactics from their Windows monopoly--they bundle LIVE's bells and whistles with muliplayer gaming--forcing Xbox 360 owners to pay for the bells and whistles even if they simply want to play online. It's amazing how many people in this forum are blind to Microsoft's shady tactics.
Avatar image for GeneralMLD
GeneralMLD

70

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 GeneralMLD
Member since 2009 • 70 Posts

lol poor lemmings. Paying $50 a month to play 16 player games with lagswitching and major lag bombs. I can play 60 player games with no lag and no cheating. :D

Ultramarine777
yet LIVE still > PSN. Go figure. and its 50 per year, not per month.
Avatar image for redskins2156
redskins2156

2553

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 redskins2156
Member since 2007 • 2553 Posts

Hey dude a 500gb hdd for the ps3 only costs $84.00 not $120.00. Plus read the reviews majority of the people have used it on a ps3, and they love it.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822152114

Buy a 360 and a PS3 put them side by side and put a dvd in the 360 and a bluray movie in the PS3. PS3 advantage.

Take a 360 game and a PS3 game and see how easily you can scratch a 360 disc and a PS3 disc. PS3 advantage gained.

Then try to hook up WiFI on 360 and PS3, try to web browse, upgrade each one's HDD as high as possible and compare the capacity and price. 500gb PS3 for $120 360 160 gb HDD $120, insert a disc into each and see which is better PS3 auto discdrive or 360 disctray, sign up 5 people on PSN and 5 on Xlive, PSN = $0 xlive = $250. Get the picture!!!

patriots7672

Avatar image for patriots7672
patriots7672

3249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 patriots7672
Member since 2008 • 3249 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralMLD"][QUOTE="teemany"] It's not a joke. You have to deal with the fact that LIVE is limited by Xbox 360's hardware, which is inferior to the PS3's. Those multiplats that look better than the PS3 versions, the differences are very, very small--most reviewers will tell you that you can't even see them until you look very, very closely. The very minor differences are only because developers use the 360 as the main platform and then port it to the PS3. If they start with the PS3, then it would be a different story. The thing is you are changing the subject...we are talking about LIVE vs. PSN. PSN is the place for best looking, best sounding, etc. contents. PSN is not only free, it's better.teemany
ur delusional. Live still surpasses PSN, despite what you may think. I think your just upset your bought a future proof console, yet it isnt #1 in online. Thats interesting..............Sony positions the PS3 as #1 in everything it does........yet it cant stack up with online services. And I bet that rocks you to your core as a fanboy.

Why am I delusional? To me, graphics, sounds, multiplayer size, less lag, the ability to create/share contents, web surfing, etc. make the PSNs advantages better than LIVE's. I mean, most people when they play, they don't talk or chat with firends playing different games anyways. But the sighs, sounds, number of players in the game, lag-free--all PSN's advantages are all there, all the time.

I've had both systems, xlive and PSN. PSN free and lag free is >>>>> than pay $50 yr per ID and lag at times. Unless you have no life and only play online and sit and spin all day on Xlive,PSN is great.

Avatar image for GeneralMLD
GeneralMLD

70

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 GeneralMLD
Member since 2009 • 70 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralMLD"][QUOTE="patriots7672"]

Buy a 360 and a PS3 put them side by side and put a dvd in the 360 and a bluray movie in the PS3. PS3 advantage.

Take a 360 game and a PS3 game and see how easily you can scratch a 360 disc and a PS3 disc. PS3 advantage gained.

Then try to hook up WiFI on 360 and PS3, try to web browse, upgrade each one's HDD as high as possible and compare the capacity and price. 500gb PS3 for $120 360 160 gb HDD $120, insert a disc into each and see which is better PS3 auto discdrive or 360 disctray, sign up 5 people on PSN and 5 on Xlive, PSN = $0 xlive = $250. Get the picture!!!

patriots7672

Yet PS3 is in last place by a growing margin. Go figure :P

I can't figure! The Wii is blowing them both out and it's way further behind the PS3 than the 360. Why is the Wii outselling both of them? Go figure?

your deflecting. 360 vs PS3 only.
Avatar image for ChrisSpartan117
ChrisSpartan117

4519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 ChrisSpartan117
Member since 2008 • 4519 Posts

[QUOTE="Ultramarine777"]

lol poor lemmings. Paying $50 a month to play 16 player games with lagswitching and major lag bombs. I can play 60 player games with no lag and no cheating. :D

GeneralMLD

yet LIVE still > PSN. Go figure. and its 50 per year, not per month.

And Steam is still better than XBL.

Avatar image for patriots7672
patriots7672

3249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 patriots7672
Member since 2008 • 3249 Posts

Hey dude a 500gb hdd for the ps3 only costs $84.00 not $120.00. Plus read the reviews majority of the people have used it on a ps3.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822152114

[QUOTE="patriots7672"]

Buy a 360 and a PS3 put them side by side and put a dvd in the 360 and a bluray movie in the PS3. PS3 advantage.

Take a 360 game and a PS3 game and see how easily you can scratch a 360 disc and a PS3 disc. PS3 advantage gained.

Then try to hook up WiFI on 360 and PS3, try to web browse, upgrade each one's HDD as high as possible and compare the capacity and price. 500gb PS3 for $120 360 160 gb HDD $120, insert a disc into each and see which is better PS3 auto discdrive or 360 disctray, sign up 5 people on PSN and 5 on Xlive, PSN = $0 xlive = $250. Get the picture!!!

redskins2156

EVen better, I stand corrected;)

Avatar image for ChrisSpartan117
ChrisSpartan117

4519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 ChrisSpartan117
Member since 2008 • 4519 Posts

[QUOTE="patriots7672"]

[QUOTE="Warzone876"]

LOL LEMMINGS

IF MULTIPLATFORMS WERE CREATED ON PS3 THEN THEY cant be ported on 360 because it is inferior.

They have to create it on 360 so it can run on both.

BTW PSN > live.

Why? because im not paying to play online lol

vaderhater

Exactly, if created on PS3 first then it wouldn't work on a 3 processor system after being created on a 7 processor system.

Are you guys for real!!???? LOL Holy Crap LOL!!!

I thought it was already established that the PS3's CPU is better, and that the 360's GPU is better.

Avatar image for Dr_Snood
Dr_Snood

2547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#63 Dr_Snood
Member since 2008 • 2547 Posts
So I am paying $50 a year for cross game chat? Honestly doesn't sound like a huge advantage to me. I am also shocked how laggy 360 online is compared to PSN.. if I didn't have a lot of friends on my 360 I wouldn't be paying the $50 a year for live.
Avatar image for Ultramarine777
Ultramarine777

1030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#64 Ultramarine777
Member since 2006 • 1030 Posts

[QUOTE="patriots7672"]

[QUOTE="Warzone876"]

LOL LEMMINGS

IF MULTIPLATFORMS WERE CREATED ON PS3 THEN THEY cant be ported on 360 because it is inferior.

They have to create it on 360 so it can run on both.

BTW PSN > live.

Why? because im not paying to play online lol

The_Game21x

Exactly, if created on PS3 first then it wouldn't work on a 3 processor system after being created on a 7 processor system.

If I recall correctly, Burnout Paradise and a few other titles were developed on the PS3 and ported...funny how that works...sort of turns your theory on its head doesn't it?

Yep, thats why Burnout Paradise plays better on PS3.

Avatar image for dethroned3
dethroned3

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 dethroned3
Member since 2007 • 1104 Posts

[QUOTE="patriots7672"] I don't see any advantages of Xlive now.

-DrRobotnik-

Good for you. XBL>PSN

good for you PSN>XBL

Avatar image for GeneralMLD
GeneralMLD

70

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 GeneralMLD
Member since 2009 • 70 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="patriots7672"]

Exactly, if created on PS3 first then it wouldn't work on a 3 processor system after being created on a 7 processor system.

Ultramarine777

If I recall correctly, Burnout Paradise and a few other titles were developed on the PS3 and ported...funny how that works...sort of turns your theory on its head doesn't it?

Yep, thats why Burnout Paradise plays better on PS3.

not by much. And its justified with your consoels hype as being "future proof". Yet with RE5 you guys make excuses when the truth is that multiplats today still favor the "aging" console.
Avatar image for GeneralMLD
GeneralMLD

70

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 GeneralMLD
Member since 2009 • 70 Posts

[QUOTE="-DrRobotnik-"]

[QUOTE="patriots7672"] I don't see any advantages of Xlive now.

dethroned3

Good for you. XBL>PSN

good for you PSN>XBL

except thats a lie and you know it.
Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralMLD"][QUOTE="Ultramarine777"]

lol poor lemmings. Paying $50 a month to play 16 player games with lagswitching and major lag bombs. I can play 60 player games with no lag and no cheating. :D

ChrisSpartan117

yet LIVE still > PSN. Go figure. and its 50 per year, not per month.

And Steam is still better than XBL.

Wow lots of guys trying to change the subject all the sudden huh?:roll:

Avatar image for II-FBIsniper-II
II-FBIsniper-II

18067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#69 II-FBIsniper-II
Member since 2005 • 18067 Posts

[QUOTE="Warzone876"]

LOL LEMMINGS

IF MULTIPLATFORMS WERE CREATED ON PS3 THEN THEY cant be ported on 360 because it is inferior.

They have to create it on 360 so it can run on both.

BTW PSN > live.

Why? because im not paying to play online lol

patriots7672

Exactly, if created on PS3 first then it wouldn't work on a 3 processor system after being created on a 7 processor system.

even though that has to be one of the most ridiculous things I've heard (and I hope it is a joke), I'll prove you wrong. Burnout Paradise
Avatar image for ChrisSpartan117
ChrisSpartan117

4519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 ChrisSpartan117
Member since 2008 • 4519 Posts

[QUOTE="ChrisSpartan117"]

[QUOTE="GeneralMLD"] yet LIVE still > PSN. Go figure. and its 50 per year, not per month. vaderhater

And Steam is still better than XBL.

Wow lots of guys trying to change the subject all the sudden huh?:roll:

Um....my username gives away on what I think on the "XBL vs. PSN" arguement. I'm just a little tired of the arguement suddenly now.

Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts

[QUOTE="vaderhater"]

[QUOTE="patriots7672"]

Exactly, if created on PS3 first then it wouldn't work on a 3 processor system after being created on a 7 processor system.

ChrisSpartan117

Are you guys for real!!???? LOL Holy Crap LOL!!!

I thought it was already established that the PS3's CPU is better, and that the 360's GPU is better.

NO REALLY...Oh and 7 (thats SEVEN PROCESSORS) comon cows if your gonna try to argue your points then learn some basic things about your hardware k? Come on :roll:

Avatar image for dethroned3
dethroned3

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 dethroned3
Member since 2007 • 1104 Posts

[QUOTE="dethroned3"]

[QUOTE="-DrRobotnik-"] Good for you. XBL>PSN

GeneralMLD

good for you PSN>XBL

except thats a lie and you know it.

no that's a personal preference.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45764 Posts

[QUOTE="ChrisSpartan117"]

[QUOTE="GeneralMLD"] yet LIVE still > PSN. Go figure. and its 50 per year, not per month. vaderhater

And Steam is still better than XBL.

Wow lots of guys trying to change the subject all the sudden huh?:roll:

Cows are known for Hiding behind the PC when it comes to the 360. :o

Avatar image for scarymovie5
scarymovie5

1691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#75 scarymovie5
Member since 2007 • 1691 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralMLD"][QUOTE="teemany"]

PSN is now better. Not equal. PSN has:

1) the best multiplayer graphics.

2) best multiplayer sounds.

3) best way to create and share user generated contents.

4) Most relaxing/soothing game.

5) Most fair multiplayer cometition--no host advantage as in LIVE.

6) largest multiplayer HD battles.

7) I can go on.

The point is the bells and whistles of LIVE don't equal the advantages of PSN. Remember LIVE is limited by Xbox 360's inferior hardware.

teemany

joke post confirmed. Live > PSN. 360 inferior hardware? It just happens to still get superior multiplats like RE5...........what does that say about ur future proof :roll: PS3?

It's not a joke. You have to deal with the fact that LIVE is limited by Xbox 360's hardware, which is inferior to the PS3's. Those multiplats that look better than the PS3 versions, the differences are very, very small--most reviewers will tell you that you can't even see them until you look very, very closely. The very minor differences are only because developers use the 360 as the main platform and then port it to the PS3. If they start with the PS3, then it would be a different story. The thing is you are changing the subject...we are talking about LIVE vs. PSN. PSN is the place for best looking, best sounding, etc. contents. PSN is not only free, it's better.

Ok then you can keep your slightly better hardware and I'll keep all the features I get use.

Avatar image for Ultramarine777
Ultramarine777

1030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#76 Ultramarine777
Member since 2006 • 1030 Posts

lol look mate, your arguement is flawed

First of all, RE5 sold way more on PS3 than 360.

Second of all ,when the PS3 price drops it will atleast make it to second place and even with possibility to pass the Wii.

More people know the Playstation brand than Nintendo and PS2 proved that by out selling every single game console made. And as we know "the past can be reflected by the future". PS3 has amazing games so that cant be argued anymore. The only thing holding it back is its price.

Multiplatform Games can not be made on PS3 because PS3 has superior hardware than the 360 so instead it created on the 360 so it can run on both. This is a fact. The few games made on PS3 like Burnout Paradise run better on the PS3. :D

Go ahead and rage now little lemmings. :lol:

Avatar image for ChrisSpartan117
ChrisSpartan117

4519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 ChrisSpartan117
Member since 2008 • 4519 Posts

[QUOTE="vaderhater"]

[QUOTE="ChrisSpartan117"]And Steam is still better than XBL.

SecretPolice

Wow lots of guys trying to change the subject all the sudden huh?:roll:

Cows are known for Hiding behind the PC when it comes to the 360. :o

Shouldn't my username tell you that I'm a lemming? If you don't get the reference, Spartan117 is the army codename to Master Chief, the main character to Halo. And I do understand why some of you may not get the reference, because that's rarely mentioned in-game.

Avatar image for GeneralMLD
GeneralMLD

70

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 GeneralMLD
Member since 2009 • 70 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralMLD"][QUOTE="dethroned3"]

good for you PSN>XBL

dethroned3

except thats a lie and you know it.

no that's a personal preference.

thats your preference, but to everybody who isnt inlisted in the Sony training camps, LIVE > PSN.
Avatar image for ChrisSpartan117
ChrisSpartan117

4519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 ChrisSpartan117
Member since 2008 • 4519 Posts

[QUOTE="patriots7672"]

[QUOTE="Warzone876"]

LOL LEMMINGS

IF MULTIPLATFORMS WERE CREATED ON PS3 THEN THEY cant be ported on 360 because it is inferior.

They have to create it on 360 so it can run on both.

BTW PSN > live.

Why? because im not paying to play online lol

II-FBIsniper-II

Exactly, if created on PS3 first then it wouldn't work on a 3 processor system after being created on a 7 processor system.

even though that has to be one of the most ridiculous things I've heard (and I hope it is a joke), I'll prove you wrong. Burnout Paradise

The 360 version gets an advantage if only because you can use alternative soundtracks to stop that terrible soundtrack:x

Avatar image for GeneralMLD
GeneralMLD

70

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 GeneralMLD
Member since 2009 • 70 Posts

lol look mate, your arguement is flawed

First of all, RE5 sold way more on PS3 than 360.

Second of all ,when the PS3 price drops it will atleast make it to second place and even with possibility to pass the Wii.

More people know the Playstation brand than Nintendo and PS2 proved that by out selling every single game console made. And as we know "the past can be reflected by the future". PS3 has amazing games so that cant be argued anymore. The only thing holding it back is its price.

Multiplatform Games can not be made on PS3 because PS3 has superior hardware than the 360 so instead it created on the 360 so it can run on both. This is a fact. The few games made on PS3 like Burnout Paradise run better on the PS3. :D

Go ahead and rage now little lemmings. :lol:

Ultramarine777
PS3 RE5 sold what, 150 k more? thats not that much and will go down in time with NA sales. With the PS3 price drop......lol for not taking into account a 360 counter drop. And :lol: for still thinking PS3 can overtake the Wii. Since when does superior hardware dictate the winner? PS1 and PS2 werent the most powerful yet they won.........kinda spits in your arguments face.
Avatar image for ackr1TE
ackr1TE

636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 ackr1TE
Member since 2007 • 636 Posts

PC > XBL > PSN (from someone who owns all these) ;)

Avatar image for yoyo462001
yoyo462001

7535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#82 yoyo462001
Member since 2005 • 7535 Posts

lol look mate, your arguement is flawed

First of all, RE5 sold way more on PS3 than 360.

Second of all ,when the PS3 price drops it will atleast make it to second place and even with possibility to pass the Wii.

More people know the Playstation brand than Nintendo and PS2 proved that by out selling every single game console made. And as we know "the past can be reflected by the future". PS3 has amazing games so that cant be argued anymore. The only thing holding it back is its price.

Multiplatform Games can not be made on PS3 because PS3 has superior hardware than the 360 so instead it created on the 360 so it can run on both. This is a fact. The few games made on PS3 like Burnout Paradise run better on the PS3. :D

Go ahead and rage now little lemmings. :lol:

Ultramarine777
wow why do you keep lying to yourself, the PS3 wil end at 3rd its too far behind dont bring in the PS2 because its a totally different environment, where are these numbers for RE5 then? and i bet you couldnt name mor than 5 games that ran better on PS3. cows are so desperate these days that their making up silly arguments its quite annoying these days.
Avatar image for XanderZane
XanderZane

5174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#83 XanderZane
Member since 2006 • 5174 Posts

[QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="patriots7672"]

It pretty much is now with today's 2.7 update with in-game video/voice chat with 16 people and in-game text chat. I don't see any advantages of Xlive now.

patriots7672

There's cross game voice chat now? Uhhhh, I didn't see that in the update, just the text chat.

There's in-game video and voice chat, but it's not cross game.

What game does this. I'd like to see some proof. Where are the screen shots? lol!! XBox Live have had that feature since the 360 Cam was released. You still can't invite people in game from one game to another.
Avatar image for dethroned3
dethroned3

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 dethroned3
Member since 2007 • 1104 Posts

[QUOTE="dethroned3"]

[QUOTE="GeneralMLD"] except thats a lie and you know it. GeneralMLD

no that's a personal preference.

thats your preference, but to everybody who isnt inlisted in the Sony training camps, LIVE > PSN.



training camp?
that's just ignorant and stubborn of you to say that.
i'm sure there are people who prefer live to psn & psn to live.
simple psychology.

Avatar image for GeneralMLD
GeneralMLD

70

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 GeneralMLD
Member since 2009 • 70 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralMLD"][QUOTE="dethroned3"]

no that's a personal preference.

dethroned3

thats your preference, but to everybody who isnt inlisted in the Sony training camps, LIVE > PSN.



training camp?
that's just ignorant and stubborn of you to say that.
i'm sure there are people who prefer live to psn & psn to live.
simple psychology.

true, some may think Live > PSN. Doesnt make them right. Live is factually a better service then PSN. If you think otherwise, yoru wrong, its as simple as that.
Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#86 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

lol look mate, your arguement is flawed

First of all, RE5 sold way more on PS3 than 360.

Oooh...I can't wait to see the proof for this one! :D

Second of all ,when the PS3 price drops it will atleast make it to second place and even with possibility to pass the Wii.

Speculation is fun!

More people know the Playstation brand than Nintendo and PS2 proved that by out selling every single game console made. And as we know "the past can be reflected by the future". PS3 has amazing games so that cant be argued anymore. The only thing holding it back is its price.

Again, speculation is fun! If the Playstation brand was truly as powerful as you think it is, it should be in the lead right now, shouldn't it? Sony certianly thought so. And come on, with the insane market penetration and sales power the Wii has, I highly doubt the name Nintendo isn't more recognizable than Xbox and Playstation when looking at the global marketplace.

Multiplatform Games can not be made on PS3 because PS3 has superior hardware than the 360 so instead it created on the 360 so it can run on both. This is a fact.The few games made on PS3 like Burnout Paradise run better on the PS3. :D

I'd like to see some proof of that too!

No, Burnout Paradise runs better on the PS3, and even then, it's by one of those incredibly miniscule margins you guys claim there is whenever a multiplat is confirmed to run better on the 360.

Go ahead and rage now little lemmings. :lol:

Ultramarine777

Avatar image for dethroned3
dethroned3

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 dethroned3
Member since 2007 • 1104 Posts

[QUOTE="dethroned3"]

[QUOTE="GeneralMLD"] thats your preference, but to everybody who isnt inlisted in the Sony training camps, LIVE > PSN. GeneralMLD



training camp?
that's just ignorant and stubborn of you to say that.
i'm sure there are people who prefer live to psn & psn to live.
simple psychology.

true, some may think Live > PSN. Doesnt make them right. Live is factually a better service then PSN. If you think otherwise, yoru wrong, its as simple as that.

and again. igorant.

blue is better than red.

Avatar image for GeneralMLD
GeneralMLD

70

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 GeneralMLD
Member since 2009 • 70 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralMLD"][QUOTE="dethroned3"]

training camp?
that's just ignorant and stubborn of you to say that.
i'm sure there are people who prefer live to psn & psn to live.
simple psychology.

dethroned3

true, some may think Live > PSN. Doesnt make them right. Live is factually a better service then PSN. If you think otherwise, yoru wrong, its as simple as that.

and again. igorant.

blue is better than red.

except your analogy assumes both colors are the same, yet just look different. Live actually has the features to warrant being better then PSN. Im not ignorant, your just blind.
Avatar image for Eddie5vs1
Eddie5vs1

6085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#89 Eddie5vs1
Member since 2004 • 6085 Posts
[QUOTE="patriots7672"]

Buy a 360 and a PS3 put them side by side and put a dvd in the 360 and a bluray movie in the PS3. PS3 advantage.

Take a 360 game and a PS3 game and see how easily you can scratch a 360 disc and a PS3 disc. PS3 advantage gained.

Then try to hook up WiFI on 360 and PS3, try to web browse, upgrade each one's HDD as high as possible and compare the capacity and price. 500gb PS3 for $120 360 160 gb HDD $120, insert a disc into each and see which is better PS3 auto discdrive or 360 disctray, sign up 5 people on PSN and 5 on Xlive, PSN = $0 xlive = $250. Get the picture!!!

I have both, and the DVD/Blu ray movie point is well....pointless. I bought a game console, not a movie player (although I primarily use my ps3 as a blu ray player). I do agree that I like how BD are more scratch resistant. I do wish I could upgrade the HDD on my 360 for a cheaper price, but sadly for cows, if all I want to do is play a current gen game without all the "extras", I can still do so for $200 by buying a 360.
Avatar image for Eddie5vs1
Eddie5vs1

6085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#90 Eddie5vs1
Member since 2004 • 6085 Posts

lol poor lemmings. Paying $50 a month to play 16 player games with lagswitching and major lag bombs. I can play 60 player games with no lag and no cheating. :D

Ultramarine777
:lol: Sorry, but PSN is just as susceptible to lag switching and cheating as XBL, if not more so. Lagwise, I am impressed with PSN.
Avatar image for True-Legend86
True-Legend86

1268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 True-Legend86
Member since 2007 • 1268 Posts
[QUOTE="GeneralMLD"][QUOTE="teemany"]

PSN is now better. Not equal. PSN has:

1) the best multiplayer graphics.

2) best multiplayer sounds.

3) best way to create and share user generated contents.

4) Most relaxing/soothing game.

5) Most fair multiplayer cometition--no host advantage as in LIVE.

6) largest multiplayer HD battles.

7) I can go on.

The point is the bells and whistles of LIVE don't equal the advantages of PSN. Remember LIVE is limited by Xbox 360's inferior hardware.

joke post confirmed. Live > PSN. 360 inferior hardware? It just happens to still get superior multiplats like RE5...........what does that say about ur future proof :roll: PS3?

There's no point in disputing hardware...everyone knows the - PS3 has superior tech = fact PSN and Live are near identical now, except for cross game chat...wonder what the damage control will be once PSN get cross game chat
Avatar image for GeneralMLD
GeneralMLD

70

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 GeneralMLD
Member since 2009 • 70 Posts
[QUOTE="True-Legend86"][QUOTE="GeneralMLD"][QUOTE="teemany"]

PSN is now better. Not equal. PSN has:

1) the best multiplayer graphics.

2) best multiplayer sounds.

3) best way to create and share user generated contents.

4) Most relaxing/soothing game.

5) Most fair multiplayer cometition--no host advantage as in LIVE.

6) largest multiplayer HD battles.

7) I can go on.

The point is the bells and whistles of LIVE don't equal the advantages of PSN. Remember LIVE is limited by Xbox 360's inferior hardware.

joke post confirmed. Live > PSN. 360 inferior hardware? It just happens to still get superior multiplats like RE5...........what does that say about ur future proof :roll: PS3?

There's no point in disputing hardware...everyone knows the - PS3 has superior tech = fact PSN and Live are near identical now, except for cross game chat...wonder what the damage control will be once PSN get cross game chat

how about sayign it took PS3 years upon years to get what LIVE had since november 2005 :lol:
Avatar image for wartutheshid
wartutheshid

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 wartutheshid
Member since 2009 • 26 Posts

lol look mate, your arguement is flawed

First of all, RE5 sold way more on PS3 than 360.

Second of all ,when the PS3 price drops it will atleast make it to second place and even with possibility to pass the Wii.

More people know the Playstation brand than Nintendo and PS2 proved that by out selling every single game console made. And as we know "the past can be reflected by the future". PS3 has amazing games so that cant be argued anymore. The only thing holding it back is its price.

Multiplatform Games can not be made on PS3 because PS3 has superior hardware than the 360 so instead it created on the 360 so it can run on both. This is a fact. The few games made on PS3 like Burnout Paradise run better on the PS3. :D

Go ahead and rage now little lemmings. :lol:

Ultramarine777

rofll, resident evil selling more on ps3 is funny. 360 has been selling more on almost all multiplats. Plus I get my live for free, so i dont care about that. I get exclusive DLC, and cross game voice chat. I get awesome games like Left 4 dead, and Halo 3, Gears of War 2. You can keep killzone, i have that on my PSP.

Live ain't worth $50 a year, probably $30 though. But i dont care, its still has great features and i havent been let down.

Lol i can imagine if i has a PS3, while im playing a game, my friend cant voice chat to me while im playing with other friends, and he doesnt have the game too.

Lame.

Avatar image for Avian005
Avian005

4112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#94 Avian005
Member since 2009 • 4112 Posts

I would like to see PSN just as good as LIVE, but it's not. It's simple fact. LIVE offers much more than PSN.

Avatar image for SpinoRaptor24
SpinoRaptor24

10316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 143

User Lists: 0

#95 SpinoRaptor24
Member since 2008 • 10316 Posts

It's still not as good as XBL.

Text chat? Why are PS3 fanboys getting excited over a feature that XBL has had for years?

Sorry cows, XBL>>>PSN.

Avatar image for Gta3-fan334
Gta3-fan334

1499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 Gta3-fan334
Member since 2004 • 1499 Posts

lol look mate, your arguement is flawed

First of all, RE5 sold way more on PS3 than 360.

Second of all ,when the PS3 price drops it will atleast make it to second place and even with possibility to pass the Wii.

More people know the Playstation brand than Nintendo and PS2 proved that by out selling every single game console made. And as we know "the past can be reflected by the future". PS3 has amazing games so that cant be argued anymore. The only thing holding it back is its price.

Multiplatform Games can not be made on PS3 because PS3 has superior hardware than the 360 so instead it created on the 360 so it can run on both. This is a fact. The few games made on PS3 like Burnout Paradise run better on the PS3. :D

Go ahead and rage now little lemmings. :lol:

Ultramarine777

Bu, bu....sales don't matter. Silly cow.;)

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="Eddie5vs1"][QUOTE="patriots7672"]

It pretty much is now with today's 2.7 update with in-game video/voice chat with 16 people and in-game text chat. I don't see any advantages of Xlive now.

patriots7672

lol, PSN get's text messaging and now you think it's on par with XBL? Let me know when you have cross game invites, voice chat among 8 people, a more integrated online experience, standard online features across ALL games, updates that don't take several minutes, etc. Then, and only then, will PSN be more on par with XBL.

It has chat among 16 people now and in-game text chat. It's free for unlimited IDs, so all 5 people in a house can have their own trophies and auto game saves without paying each time.

It has video and voice chat OUT of game not in game, and 16 people? lol how useless, i doubt the video chat is 16 people at once.
Avatar image for GodofBigMacs
GodofBigMacs

6440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#98 GodofBigMacs
Member since 2008 • 6440 Posts
Actually, voice chat isn't in-game, I don't think... Also, PSN also needs Game Invites, but there's absolutely no way in hell that I would pay 50 dollars a year just for freakin' game invites and in-game voice chat...
Avatar image for hockeyruler12
hockeyruler12

8114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#99 hockeyruler12
Member since 2005 • 8114 Posts

PSN is now better. Not equal. PSN has:

1) the best multiplayer graphics.

2) best multiplayer sounds.

3) best way to create and share user generated contents.

4) Most relaxing/soothing game.

5) Most fair multiplayer cometition--no host advantage as in LIVE.

6) largest multiplayer HD battles.

7) I can go on.

The point is the bells and whistles of LIVE don't equal the advantages of PSN. Remember LIVE is limited by Xbox 360's inferior hardware.

teemany
1. How is this even a network issue? Graphics are part of the game, not the service 2. same as above 3. Halo 3? forge anybody? 4. this is an advantage? 5. many games have no host advantage on xbox live 6. if you need 64 player online matches, be my guest 7. your seventh point is "i can go on"? and inferior hardware? Is this why 90% of multiplats look and play better on 360?
Avatar image for usule
usule

1734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 usule
Member since 2003 • 1734 Posts

but... I thought April fools was yesterday...